<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Labor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/labor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 21:50:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Today&#8217;s jobs report is a mixed bag</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/todays_jobs_report_is_a_mixed_bag/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/todays_jobs_report_is_a_mixed_bag/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 16:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On the Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austerity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The unemployment rate is holding steady at 7.8 percent, which suggests economic growth is a bit sluggish]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today’s employment report shows steady employment growth, fast enough to keep the jobless rate from rising, but not fast enough to knock it down much.</p><p>December’s payrolls were up 155,000 and the unemployment rate held steady at 7.8 percent.  Factories and construction sites added jobs — 25,000 and 30,000, respectively — an improvement over recent months.  On the other hand, the public sector shed another 13,000 jobs, driven exclusively by local governments, the continuation of a longer-term negative trend as localities struggle with budget constraints.</p><p>Hourly wages and average weekly hours got a bit of a bump up as well, so weekly earnings are up 2.4 percent over the past year.  Since inflation recently has been tracking at around 2 percent, that’s a slight gain in real pay (important, because starting this month, most workers will take a 2 percent hit to their paychecks due to the expiration of the payroll tax break, a casualty of the fiscal cliff deal).  There was also some evidence of more folks moving from part-time into full-time jobs.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/todays_jobs_report_is_a_mixed_bag/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/todays_jobs_report_is_a_mixed_bag/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NHL cancels games through Jan. 14</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/nhl_cancels_all_games_through_jan_14/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/nhl_cancels_all_games_through_jan_14/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 21:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hockey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/nhl_cancels_all_games_through_jan_14/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The lockout has reached day 96]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NEW YORK (AP) — The NHL has wiped out all games through Jan. 14, and if it needs to make any more cancellations, the entire season could be the next thing to go.</p><p>So far, 625 regular-season games have been canceled, including nearly 200 in the announcement made Thursday — the 96th day of the NHL's lockout. The league had previously scratched all games through Dec. 30. If a new collective bargaining agreement with the players' association isn't reached quickly, another full season might soon be lost.</p><p>NHL deputy commissioner Bill Daly said in a radio interview on Wednesday that mid-January is likely the latest the sides could go to make a deal to save the season. However, Daly says he expects the season to be played.</p><p>No drop-dead date has been publicly announced by the NHL, which is the only North American professional sports league to cancel a season due to a labor dispute. A lockout forced the 2004-05 to be lost.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/nhl_cancels_all_games_through_jan_14/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/nhl_cancels_all_games_through_jan_14/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michigan&#8217;s right-to-work bill cribs ALEC</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/michigans_right_to_work_bill_cribs_alec/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/michigans_right_to_work_bill_cribs_alec/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 23:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right-to-work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Snyder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ALEC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13122207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The bill passed today takes language verbatim from ALEC's model legislation]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Republican-backed <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/right_to_work_doesnt_work/">right-to-work bill</a> given final approval Tuesday in Michigan contains language cribbed verbatim from a model anti-union bill created by ALEC, according to a watchdog group.</p><p>The American Legislative Exchange Council, of course, is the corporate-backed, conservative-leaning organization that has become a bugaboo for liberals by pushing legislation to do everything from roll back environmental regulation to weaken gun control laws, as brought to the fore this year by the murder of Trayvon Martin. ALEC, like lots of groups that work in state capitols, creates “model legislation” that friendly lawmakers can introduce in whole or as a basis for their own bills.</p><p>Both Michigan’s <a href="http://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/2011-2012/billengrossed/House/htm/2011-HEBS-4003.htm">HB 4003</a>, which affects public sector unions, and <a href="http://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/2011-2012/billengrossed/House/htm/2011-HEBH-4054.htm">HB 4054</a>, which affects private sector unions, appears to pull language directly from <a href="http://alecexposed.org/w/images/c/c8/1R10-Right_to_Work_Act_Exposed.pdf">ALEC’s model right-to-work bill</a>. The Center for Media and Democracy, a liberal watchdog group which has been working for years to expose ALEC’s activities, created <a href="http://www.prwatch.org/files/Michigan_HB_4003_(public_sector)_side_by_side.pdf">these</a> <a href="http://www.prwatch.org/files/Michigan_HB_4054_side-by-side.pdf">chart</a> comparing the language:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/michigans_right_to_work_bill_cribs_alec/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/michigans_right_to_work_bill_cribs_alec/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Right-to-work doesn&#8217;t work</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/right_to_work_doesnt_work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/right_to_work_doesnt_work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organized labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Snyder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lansing MI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13121811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michigan passes an anti-union law and claims it's good for workers. Economists say sure -- if you own the company]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michigan lawmakers gave <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/thousands_to_rally_against_michigan_right_to_work/">final approval today</a> to a so-called right-to-work law, which bans unions from charging mandatory dues, arguing that it will be a boon for the state’s economy. “This is to move Michigan forward. It’s about more and better jobs, and it’s about worker choice,” Republican Gov. Rick Snyder told MSNBC this afternoon.</p><p>Right-to-work laws are already in place in 22 states, so do they actually create more and better jobs? We asked some experts to find out and the answer is, well, complicated.</p><p>Lonnie Stevans, a professor at Hofstra University who used quantitative models to <a href="http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/rle.2009.5.1/rle.2009.5.1.1352/rle.2009.5.1.1352.xml?format=INT">study the issue</a>, is not bullish on the laws. “Although right-to-work states may be more attractive to business, this would not necessarily translate into enhanced economic verve in the right-to-work state if there is little ‘trickle-down’ from business owners to the non-unionized workers," he told Salon.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/right_to_work_doesnt_work/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/right_to_work_doesnt_work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michigan exposes America&#8217;s inequality &#8220;cliff&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/americas_forgotten_inequality_cliff/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/americas_forgotten_inequality_cliff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 15:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RobertReich.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13121300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While Washington wrings its hands over the budget deficit, a true crisis is playing out in the country's heartland]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Washington has a way of focusing the nation’s attention on tactical games over partisan maneuvers that are symptoms of a few really big problems. But we almost never get to debate or even discuss the big problems because the tactical games overwhelm everything else.</p><p>The debate over the fiscal cliff, for example, is really about tactical maneuvers preceding a negotiation about how best to reduce the federal budget deficit. This, in turn, is a fragment of a bigger debate over whether we should be embracing austerity economics and reducing the budget deficit in the next few years or, alternatively, using public spending and investing to grow the economy and increase the number of jobs.</p><p>Even this larger debate is just one part of what should be the central debate of our time — why median wages continue to drop and poverty to increase at the same time income and wealth are becoming ever more concentrated at the top, and what should be done to counter the trend.</p><p>With a shrinking share of total income and wealth, the middle class and poor simply don’t have the purchasing power to get the economy back on solid footing. (The wealthy don’t spend enough of their income or assets to make up for this shortfall, and they invest their savings wherever around the world they can get the highest return).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/americas_forgotten_inequality_cliff/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/americas_forgotten_inequality_cliff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dumb tweet of the day: On abortion and right-to-work</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/dumb_tweet_of_the_day_on_abortion_and_right_to_work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/dumb_tweet_of_the_day_on_abortion_and_right_to_work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 22:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro-choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dumb tweet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right-to-work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13120834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why should women seeking abortions get all the choice, one Twitter user wonders]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[embedtweet id="278209369588523008"]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/dumb_tweet_of_the_day_on_abortion_and_right_to_work/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/dumb_tweet_of_the_day_on_abortion_and_right_to_work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Right-to-work bill: Michigan just gives up</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/right_to_work_bill_michigan_just_gives_up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/right_to_work_bill_michigan_just_gives_up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 21:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right-to-work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13120677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An anti-union bill is the wrong response to a brain drain, and ensures the state will only create low-paying jobs]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to understand why Michigan is going to pass a right-to-work law this week, go to the <a href="www.grandriverbar.com">Grand River Bar &amp; Grill,</a> a tavern on the north side of Chicago. It’s one of a half-dozen Chicago bars designed to appeal to graduates of Michigan State University. Green and white flags hang on the walls, the MSU fight song blares during Spartan basketball games, and there’s even a euchre league, for fans of the countrified form of bridge played in Michigan college dorms.</p><p>Fifty percent of Michigan State students now leave the state immediately after graduation. That ratio doubled in the 2000s, which is known in Michigan as “The Lost Decade.” In those 10 years, Michigan dropped from 30th to 35th in the percentage of college graduates, and from 18th to 37th in per capita income. (Michigan was also the only state to lose population in the last census.) The university system’s main function is giving Michigan’s brightest students a credential to get the hell off that jobless peninsula.</p><p>Their No. 1 destination is Chicago, the drain where most of the brains in the Midwest end up. (Every Big Ten school is represented by at least one bar there.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/right_to_work_bill_michigan_just_gives_up/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/right_to_work_bill_michigan_just_gives_up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democrats: Fiscal cliff deal must have jobless benefits</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/democrats_fiscal_cliff_deal_must_have_jobless_benefits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/democrats_fiscal_cliff_deal_must_have_jobless_benefits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 23:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13119447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Benefits could run out for millions four days after Christmas]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hovering in the background of the "fiscal cliff" debate is the prospect of 2 million people losing their unemployment benefits four days after Christmas.</p><p>"This is the real cliff," said Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I. He's been leading the effort to include another extension of benefits for the long-term unemployed in any deal to avert looming tax increases and massive spending cuts in January.</p><p>"Many of these people are struggling to pay mortgages, to provide education for their children," Reed said this past week as President Barack Obama and House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, rejected each other's opening offers for a deficit deal.</p><p>Emergency jobless benefits for about 2.1 million people out of work more than six months will cease Dec. 29, and 1 million more will lose them over the next three months if Congress doesn't extend the assistance again.</p><p>Since the collapse of the economy in 2008, the government has poured $520 billion - an amount equal to about half its annual deficit in recent years - into unemployment benefit extensions.</p><p>White House officials have assured Democrats that Obama is committed to extending them another year, at a cost of about $30 billion, as part of an agreement for sidestepping the fiscal cliff and reducing the size of annual increases in the federal debt.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/democrats_fiscal_cliff_deal_must_have_jobless_benefits/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/democrats_fiscal_cliff_deal_must_have_jobless_benefits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bringing the Apple jobs back home</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/bringing_the_apple_jobs_back_home/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/bringing_the_apple_jobs_back_home/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Cook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offshoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reverse globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foxconn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organized labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13117486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reverse globalization is suddenly in the headlines. Here's why American workers shouldn't be jumping for joy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim Cook may not be Steve Jobs, but the new Apple CEO proved this week that he is just as good as the old Apple CEO at getting the media to snap to attention. One carefully calibrated bomb dropped toward the end of a humongous Bloomberg BusinessWeek interview -- that <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-12-06/tim-cooks-freshman-year-the-apple-ceo-speaks#p9">Apple plans to spend $100 million</a> to bring some Mac manufacturing back to the United States in 2013 -- rocketed around the world, from Twitter to the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/07/technology/apple-to-resume-us-manufacturing.html?hp ">New York Times,</a> in less time than it takes to run down the battery on your iPhone. Who needs Steve Jobs? Real <em>jobs</em> are coming back to America!</p><p>The timing was perfect for a growing cohort of economy-watchers eager to make the argument that globalization's malign impact on the American worker has hit high tide and is finally beginning to ebb. Just a week ago, the Atlantic presciently published <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2012/12/the-insourcing-boom/309166/">"The Insourcing Boom,"</a> a fascinating in-depth story by Charles Fishman investigating General Electric's decision to start up new appliance assembly lines in the U.S. And "GE is not alone," writes Fishman,  arguing that an increasing number of American corporations are discovering it makes economic sense to bring the factories back home. Apple's news was the exclamation point at the end of the Atlantic's sentence.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/bringing_the_apple_jobs_back_home/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/bringing_the_apple_jobs_back_home/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fast-food striker fired &#8212; but not for long</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/01/fast_food_striker_fired_but_not_for_long/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/01/fast_food_striker_fired_but_not_for_long/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2012 14:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fast food strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McDonalds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wendy's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McDonald's strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13112343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Wendy's worker is fired -- then reinstated -- and the surprise strike by NYC workers sparks little backlash]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Friday, 200-some New York City fast food workers returned to work after pulling off an <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/in_rare_strike_nyc_fast_food_workers_walk_out/" target="_blank">unprecedented strike</a> against one of the country’s largest and lowest-paying industries. They didn’t return alone – the strikers were escorted back into their stores by squads of supporters designed to discourage managers from retaliating. And organizers say the fast food companies so far haven’t tried to punish strikers, with one dramatic exception: A Wendy’s store that told a woman she was fired, then backed down after the store was occupied and picketed by activists, community leaders, and a member of the City Council.</p><p>According to Councilmember Jumanne Williams, 10 out of 11 strikers were allowed to resume work when they arrived at Brooklyn’s 425 Fulton Street Wendy’s, but management told the eleventh that she was being fired for absenteeism. Williams said that workers provided management with written notice that they were striking Thursday, but a manager claimed not to have received it. “We tried to speak with the general manager that was there, and he wasn’t forthcoming in talking to me,” said Williams. “So I decided to ask all of the customers that were there if they would leave in support of the worker that was fired. That did happen – they left. We began to protest in the store.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/01/fast_food_striker_fired_but_not_for_long/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/01/fast_food_striker_fired_but_not_for_long/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wal-Mart&#8217;s not the only one responsible for the Bangladesh fires</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/wal_marts_not_the_only_one_responsible_for_the_bangladeshi_fires/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/wal_marts_not_the_only_one_responsible_for_the_bangladeshi_fires/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 17:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bangladesh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wal-Mart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian Science Monitor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13110131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apparel factories have grown impossibly hostile to organized labor -- and major retailers are turning a blind eye]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> A day after Walmart workers and their allies staged <a href="http://www.alternet.org/labor/walmart-walkouts-are-just-start">protests and rallies</a> outside the company’s stores across the U.S., a fire erupted in a factory across the globe in Bangladesh, killing 112 workers who were trapped inside, where they sewed jeans and other apparel for the retail giant’s Faded Glory brand. Another 200 were injured in the fire. On Monday, the streets of Dhaka, the capital city, were <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/27/world/asia/garment-workers-stage-protest-in-bangladesh-after-deadly-fire.html">filled with thousands</a> of garment workers, who demanded justice.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/wal_marts_not_the_only_one_responsible_for_the_bangladeshi_fires/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/wal_marts_not_the_only_one_responsible_for_the_bangladeshi_fires/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fighting our new nanny economy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/fighting_our_new_nanny_economy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/fighting_our_new_nanny_economy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 13:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caregivers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Domestic Workers Alliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housekeepers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nannies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carework]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13109515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part-time work, low pay, no retirement benefits -- domestic workers are the next front for the labor movement]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Job seekers, take note: Massive opportunities in a growing sector of the economy! Perks include low pay -- often below the state minimum wage -- no retirement or pension benefits, often no health insurance, a pretty significant likelihood of stress injuries, and lack of legal protections against harm in the workplace. As a bonus, you'll be told you're "part of the family" -- though what that actually means really depends on your employer's individual generosity.</p><p>Just take your pick from being a nanny, housekeeper or elder caregiver, the jobs included in a groundbreaking new study on domestic labor released this week, which surveyed over 2,000 domestic workers from around the country (and in nine different languages). Such jobs grew almost 10 percent between 2004 and 2010, according to census data, which didn't include related categories like cooks and chauffeurs. Ninety-five percent of such workers are female; they are overwhelmingly women of color and immigrants. (An actual, grim bonus: You can't be outsourced.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/fighting_our_new_nanny_economy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/fighting_our_new_nanny_economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In rare strike, NYC fast-food workers walk out</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/in_rare_strike_nyc_fast_food_workers_walk_out/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/in_rare_strike_nyc_fast_food_workers_walk_out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 11:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fast food strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McDonald's strike]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13109740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a Black Friday action at Wal-Mart, NYC fast-food workers walk out, challenging a nearly union-free industry]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At 6:30 this morning, New York City fast food workers walked off the job, launching a rare strike against a nearly union-free industry. Organizers expect workers at dozens of stores to join the one-day strike, a bold challenge to an industry whose low wages, limited hours and precarious employment typify a growing portion of the U.S. economy.</p><p>New York City workers are organizing at McDonald's, Burger King, Domino’s, KFC, Taco Bell, Wendy’s and Papa John’s. Organizers expect today’s strike to include workers from almost all of those chains, with the largest group coming from McDonald's; the company did not respond to a request for comment.</p><p>But employees were clear about their reasons for walking out. “They’re not paying us enough to survive,” McDonald's worker Raymond Lopez told Salon in a pre-strike interview. Lopez said he decided to join today’s strike because “This company has enough money to pay us a reasonable amount for all that we do … they’re just not going to give it to us as long as they can get away with it. I think we need to be heard.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/in_rare_strike_nyc_fast_food_workers_walk_out/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/in_rare_strike_nyc_fast_food_workers_walk_out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>107</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Must-see morning clip</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/must_see_morning_clip_71/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/must_see_morning_clip_71/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twinkie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hostess]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must see morning clip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[junk food]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13109053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jon Stewart examines the death of the American Twinkie]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"What could have destroyed this beloved American diabetes dispensary?" asks Jon Stewart, regarding the shuttering of Twinkie maker Hostess. Was it the unions? American moms? CEOs? Newt Gingrich? Jon Stewart takes a hard look at the death of the Twinkie and how America's future generations will "get by" without it.</p><div style="background-color: #000000; width: 410px;"> <div style="padding: 4px;"><iframe src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/embed/mgid:cms:video:thedailyshow.com:421545" frameborder="0" width="400" height="228"></iframe></p> <p style="text-align: left; background-color: #ffffff; padding: 4px; margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 0px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/tue-november-27-2012/the-employees-strike-back---twinkie-s-end">The Daily Show with Jon Stewart</a></strong><br /> Get More: <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/">Daily Show Full Episodes</a>,<a href="http://www.indecisionforever.com/">Political Humor &amp; Satire Blog</a>,<a href="http://www.facebook.com/thedailyshow">The Daily Show on Facebook</a></p> </div> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/must_see_morning_clip_71/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/must_see_morning_clip_71/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A judge searches for free labor</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/a_judge_searches_for_free_labor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/a_judge_searches_for_free_labor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[william martinez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal judicial clerkship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13104279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brand-new (and possibly illegal) low: U.S. judge wants a clerk who will "morally commit" for a year -- without pay]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a story of what’s happening to the best and the brightest of the echo boomer generation -- the children of the baby boomers, many of whom, to echo Bob Dylan, have finished 20 years of schooling, only to find they can’t get put on the day shift.</p><p>Traditionally, the most prestigious job a law school graduate can get straight out of school is a federal judicial clerkship. Holders of these one-year positions are usually much sought-after by big law firms and other desirable employers, and the competition among law students for federal clerkships is ferocious.</p><p>Even at elite law schools, only students at or near the top of class have a reasonable shot at a federal clerkship. In addition, now many young lawyers with sterling resumes have begun applying for clerkships. The result is that any federal judge will be deluged with hundreds of highly qualified candidates for an open position.</p><p>In response, the government has created an online application site for judicial clerks, featuring strict rules about when candidates can apply and when clerkship offers can be made. William Martinez, a federal judge in Denver, is currently using the site to solicit applications for a standard year-long clerkship in his chambers.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/a_judge_searches_for_free_labor/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/a_judge_searches_for_free_labor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>75</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unions flexed muscles in state campaigns</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/unions_flexed_muscles_in_state_campaigns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/unions_flexed_muscles_in_state_campaigns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 14:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFL-CIO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/unions_flexed_muscles_in_state_campaigns/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Labor pushed to elect Democratic governors and defeat anti-union ballot initiatives ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — From California to Maine, unions used their political muscle in the recent elections to help install Democratic governors, build labor-friendly majorities in state legislatures and defeat ballot initiatives against them.</p><p>The combination of union money and member mobilization helped Democrats take control of state legislatures in Maine and Minnesota.</p><p>In Michigan, voters repealed a law that allowed cities in financial distress to suspend collective bargaining contracts. But unions lost there on an effort to make collective bargaining rights a part of the state constitution.</p><p>In New Hampshire, unions helped Maggie Hassan win the governor's race. Unions spent millions backing Hassan with television ads and an extensive get-out-the-vote operation because she opposes a right-to-work bill to ban labor-management contracts that require affected workers to be union members or pay union fees.</p><p>In perhaps their most important victory, unions defeated a California ballot measure that would have prohibited them from collecting money for political purposes through payroll deductions.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/unions_flexed_muscles_in_state_campaigns/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/unions_flexed_muscles_in_state_campaigns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Denny&#8217;s to offset Obamacare costs by cutting worker hours</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/dennys_to_offset_obamacare_costs_by_cutting_worker_hours/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/dennys_to_offset_obamacare_costs_by_cutting_worker_hours/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 21:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fast food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denny's]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13100040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Florida franchise of the restaurant is among a number of chains cutting labor costs]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In order to offset the costs of the Affordable Care Act, a chain of Denny's restaurants plans<span> reduce employees' hours. The Mail Online<a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2233221/Dennys-charge-5-Obamacare-surcharge-cut-employee-hours-deal-cost-legislation.html?fb_action_ids=855459056233&amp;fb_action_types=og.likes&amp;fb_source=other_multiline&amp;action_object_map={%22855459056233%22:266583473464386}&amp;action_type_map={%22855459056233%22:%22og.likes%22}&amp;action_ref_map=[]"> reported </a>Thursday <span>that Florida-based restaurant owner John Metz, who runs approximately 40 Denny's and owns the Hurricane Grill &amp; Wings franchise, will cut workers' hours in advance of Obamacare's full implementation in January 2014.<br /> </span></span></p><p><span>"It's going to force my employees to go out and get a second job," Metz admitted to the Mail, saying he felt he had no choice.</span></p><p>Metz has also considered adding a 5 percent surcharge to customer bills, but has no plans to implement this idea.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/dennys_to_offset_obamacare_costs_by_cutting_worker_hours/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/dennys_to_offset_obamacare_costs_by_cutting_worker_hours/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Progressives get ready to push the president</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/progressives_get_ready_to_push_obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/progressives_get_ready_to_push_obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 21:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["grand bargain"]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13071683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They'd rather fight for Obama, but if the White House wobbles on entitlements, expect "a huge backlash"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fears that liberal disaffection would hurt Obama at the polls proved groundless last week when the Democratic base came out in force. But Obama's honeymoon with the left may not last long.</p><p>The top priority for Congress as it reconvenes this week is to deal with the so-called fiscal cliff, and progressives are worried that Obama and congressional Democrats may agree to a “grand bargain” that includes cuts to social safety net programs, especially Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, or gives a tax break to the wealthy.</p><p>Progressive activists are now preparing to turn the firepower they marshaled to reelect the president against him if he looks like he's backing down on his mandate, as they see it, to preserve the social safety net and raise taxes on the wealthy.</p><p>“Our members are really really fired up to fight alongside of him and fight Republicans who are holding the economy hostage,” Ilya Sheyman of MoveOn.org told Salon. “But at the same time, it is also true that we have a very clear bright line from our members on Social Security and Medicare. That’s the top priority for our membership and we’re staying fully mobilized.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/progressives_get_ready_to_push_obama/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/progressives_get_ready_to_push_obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Labor chief Richard Trumka: &#8220;We won&#8217;t be taken for granted&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/labor_chief_richard_trumka_we_wont_be_taken_for_granted/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/labor_chief_richard_trumka_we_wont_be_taken_for_granted/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFL-CIO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Trumka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organized labor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13066194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The AFL-CIO president talks Obama's win, the struggles ahead, and the movement's evolving political role]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unions had a good night last Tuesday. “I think we were the margin in states like Ohio, Wisconsin and Nevada, and probably three or four other ones,” AFL-CIO president Richard Trumka told Salon in a Wednesday interview. In Ohio, said Trumka, AFL-CIO members are 83 percent white. 40 percent are evangelicals, and 53 percent own guns. “And they voted 70 percent for Barack Obama.”</p><p>Building on last year’s successful referendum campaign to overturn collective bargaining attacks in Ohio, the AFL-CIO racked up 80,000 volunteer shifts and 2 million voter contacts in the state. An all-out labor effort also helped deliver victory for labor stalwarts like Elizabeth Warren and Tammy Baldwin. While unions’ effort to write collective bargaining rights into Michigan’s constitution fell flat, they beat back well-funded anti-union measures in Michigan and California that their enemies would love to take national.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/labor_chief_richard_trumka_we_wont_be_taken_for_granted/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/labor_chief_richard_trumka_we_wont_be_taken_for_granted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Randi Weingarten answers &#8220;anything&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/26/randi_weingarten_answers_anything/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/26/randi_weingarten_answers_anything/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 22:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ask Me Anything]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teachers Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teachers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reddit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Randi Weingarten]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13054063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The American Federation of Teachers president defended her union on Reddit]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers, t<a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/124dur/i_am_the_president_of_the_american_federation_of/">ook to Reddit</a> to discuss the federation, her salary and public sector unions. Reddit's Ask Me Anything ("AMA,") is a popular feature where anonymous users can pose questions to notable people.</p><p>Weingarten was writing from the back of a tour bus between stops in Florida, where she is campaigning for President Obama. Here are a few highlights:</p><p><strong>bobman15: I hear a lot of people slamming teachers unions because of how easy it is to get tenure and how hard it is to fire bad teachers. Are they correct or not and why?</strong></p><p>Teacher unions represent teachers. And it’s management (e.g. principals, school boards, superintendents) who hire and evaluate teachers and grant tenure – not teachers unions...Tenure should be about fairness and not an excuse for managers not to manage or an inadvertent cloak of incompetence.</p><p><strong>fejorama: FDR warnd against allowing government employees to unionize, because of the large potential for a conflict of interest. Why do you believe he was incorrect?</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/26/randi_weingarten_answers_anything/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/26/randi_weingarten_answers_anything/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>