<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Labor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/labor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 18:22:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The conservative case for raising the minimum wage</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/18/the_conservative_case_for_raising_the_minimum_wage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/18/the_conservative_case_for_raising_the_minimum_wage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minimum wage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13302126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A leading conservative argues that immigration reform and a boost in wages need to go hand in hand]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congress is currently considering bipartisan legislation providing an amnesty for America's 11 million illegal immigrants, probably combined with extra visas for skilled workers and an agricultural guestworker program. But principled liberals and conservatives should both demand that any immigration reform proposal also include a sharp rise in the federal minimum wage.</p><p>The reason is simple. Any increase in the supply or job mobility of willing workers will tend to benefit Capital at the expense of Labor, stifling any growth in working-class wages, especially given our high unemployment rates. The last 40 years have seen a huge increase in immigration, and it is hardly coincidental that median American wages have been stagnant or declining throughout most of this same period. A large boost in the minimum wage, perhaps to $12 an hour or more, would be the best means of reversing our current economic race to the bottom.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/18/the_conservative_case_for_raising_the_minimum_wage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/18/the_conservative_case_for_raising_the_minimum_wage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Have we lost our minds?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/dont_shoot_organize_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/dont_shoot_organize_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 19:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Moyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13295460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Drop your weapons and celebrate that we live in a country where peaceful change is still possible]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We were struck this week by one response to our broadcast last week on gun violence and the Newtown school killings. A visitor to the website wrote, “It is interesting to me that Bill Moyers, who every week describes the massive levels of corruption in our government… [and] the advocates for gun control don’t understand that we who own guns in part own them to be sure that when our government becomes so corrupt we have guns to do something about it.”</p><p>About the same time that man’s post showed up on the web, we saw the <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/armed-revolution-44-republicans-article-1.1332621">startling survey</a> from Fairleigh Dickinson University’s PublicMind polling organization, the one finding that nearly three in ten registered voters agree with the statement: “In the next few years, an armed revolution might be necessary in order to protect our liberties.” Three out of ten! That includes 44 percent of Republicans, 27 percent of independents and 18 percent of Democrats.</p><p>That poll also noted that a quarter of Americans think that facts about the Newtown shootings “are being hidden,” and an additional 11 percent “are unsure.” As Sahil Kapur <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2013/05/armed-rebellion-poll.php">wrote at Talking Points Memo</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/dont_shoot_organize_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/dont_shoot_organize_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>104</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Surprise fast food strike planned in St. Louis</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/surprise_fast_food_strike_planned_in_st_louis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/surprise_fast_food_strike_planned_in_st_louis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fast food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fast food strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McDonalds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wendy's]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13292875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Breaking: Walkout to include workers from McDonald’s and Wendy’s. Follows similar actions in New York and Chicago]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the third time in five weeks, non-union fast food workers in a major American city are headed out on strike. Starting at 5 p.m. Central Time today, dozens of employees plan to walk off the job in St. Louis,  following similar strikes in Chicago April 24, and in New York City on Nov. 29 and April 4. Like their counterparts in New York and Chicago, the St. Louis workers are demanding a $15 an hour wage, and the chance to form a union without intimidation.</p><p>“I just feel that if we don’t stand up now, it’s never going to happen,” said Tomecka Wilson, a 32-year-old who works for the seafood chain Captain D’s. “They’re making billions off of us making little to nothing. So they can afford to share a little bit more.”</p><p>Organizers expect 50 to 70 St. Louis workers to strike over the next 24 hours, including workers from McDonald’s, Wendy’s, Hardee’s and Domino’s. The strike got an early start this morning, when a group of workers at a Jimmy John’s went out on strike in protest over alleged humiliation by management: They say their boss required them to wear signs stating that they worked too slowly. “It’s clearly getting national traction,” said Ed Ott, a lecturer in labor studies for the City University of New York, consultant for unions, and board member of New York Communities for Change, the group spearheading fast food organizing in the nation’s largest city. “This is potentially the largest organizing drive in decades.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/surprise_fast_food_strike_planned_in_st_louis/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/surprise_fast_food_strike_planned_in_st_louis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP pushes bogus workplace bill from 1996</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/gop_pushes_bogus_workplace_bill_from_1996/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/gop_pushes_bogus_workplace_bill_from_1996/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 18:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Cantor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle Class]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workplace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Families]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13290892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republicans' new plan to help working families is neither new, nor helpful to working families. Oops]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week, House Republicans are rolling out a plan they hope will <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/gop_seeks_alternative_to_overtime_pay/singleton/">boost the party's appeal among working families</a>, by giving private sector workers the option of converting overtime pay to paid time off. Pushing the bill, which is expected to get a vote this week, is House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, who made it a key item in his <a href="http://majorityleader.gov/newsroom/2013/02/excerpts-of-leader-cantors-major-policy-speech-makinglifework.html">big February speech</a> pitching the GOP to working families. The speech was meant to kick off the GOP's <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/02/05/cantor-republicans-speech-message/1892513/">new, softer agenda, but if the party is looking for fresh ideas after their defeat in the 2012 election, this isn't one.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/gop_pushes_bogus_workplace_bill_from_1996/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/gop_pushes_bogus_workplace_bill_from_1996/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can global brands create just supply chains?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/04/whos_responsible_for_promoting_global_labor_standards_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/04/whos_responsible_for_promoting_global_labor_standards_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[factories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Labor and Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13288717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To do so, the public will need to hold companies like Apple and Nike accountable for fair labor standards]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.bostonreview.net/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/12/title-e1356145289357.jpeg" alt="Boston Review" align="left" /></a>When Jia Jingchuan, a 27-year-old electronics worker in Suzhou, China, sought compensation for the chemical poisoning he suffered at work, he appealed neither to his employer nor to his government. Instead, he addressed the global brand that purchased the product he was working on. “We hope Apple will heed to its corporate social responsibility.”</p><p>In the past, his appeal would probably have fallen on deaf ears. But today, throughout the world, buyers in many industries have acknowledged a degree of responsibility for workplace conditions in supplier factories and pledged to ensure that the goods they eventually market are not made under abusive, dangerous, environmentally degrading, or otherwise unethical conditions. These businesses have committed to using private, voluntary regulation to address labor issues traditionally regulated by government or unions. And for the most part, the companies have acted on these commitments.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/04/whos_responsible_for_promoting_global_labor_standards_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/04/whos_responsible_for_promoting_global_labor_standards_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How shoppers can help prevent Bangladesh-type disasters</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/how_shoppers_can_help_prevent_bangladesh_type_disasters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/how_shoppers_can_help_prevent_bangladesh_type_disasters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bangladesh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bangladesh Garment Factory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walmart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adidas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287918</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In wake of the garment factory tragedy, here's what ethical clothing consumers can do via the global supply chain]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While rescue workers continue to dig through the rubble of Rana Plaza, the collapsed Bangladeshi garment factory responsible for the deaths of 433 people (and counting), Americans are faced yet again with the stark reality of consumer culpability in these disasters.</p><p>Major clothing retailers like Wal-Mart, Joe Fresh, JCPenney and the Children's Place were each found to have <a href="http://business.time.com/2013/05/02/bangladesh-factory-collapse-is-there-blood-on-your-shirt/">subcontracted manufacturing</a> to the crumbling factory in Savar, where workers were making an average of $38 a month and coerced to report to work even after the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/bangladesh_building_collapse_toll_climbs_to_433_ap/singleton/">walls of the building were literally falling apart</a>. In November, fire ravaged another garment factory near the capital city of Dhaka, leaving 112 dead. Again, pieces of clothing from Sears, the Walt Disney Co. and other major retailers were found among the scorched remains.</p><p>In the aftermath of such tragic, and preventable, losses of life, many consumers are left asking themselves what role they can play in discouraging disasters like this from happening again. And, fortunately, there are answers. The collective power of workers is a real thing, and the collective power of consumers is, too.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/how_shoppers_can_help_prevent_bangladesh_type_disasters/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/how_shoppers_can_help_prevent_bangladesh_type_disasters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beanie Baby manufacturer&#8217;s corrupt labor practices</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/beanie_babies_manufacturer_accused_of_shady_labor_practices_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/beanie_babies_manufacturer_accused_of_shady_labor_practices_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 21:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ProPublica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ty inc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beanie babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigrants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13285911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ty Inc. relies on illicit labor brokers, or raiteros, to recruit immigrant workers who earn well below minimum wage]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.propublica.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/12/Logo-e1354323738840.jpg" alt="ProPublica" /></a>CHICAGO — Ty Inc. became one of the world's largest manufacturers of stuffed animals thanks to the Beanie Babies craze in the 1990s.</p><p>But it has stayed on top partly by using an underworld of labor brokers known as <em>raiteros</em>, who pick up workers from Chicago's street corners and shuttle them to Ty's warehouse on behalf of one of the nation's largest temp agencies.</p><div> <div> <aside> <div> <div> <div> <p><span style="font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;">The system provides just-in-time labor at the lowest possible cost to large companies — but also effectively pushes workers' pay far below the minimum wage.</span></p> </div> </div> </div> </aside> </div> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/beanie_babies_manufacturer_accused_of_shady_labor_practices_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/beanie_babies_manufacturer_accused_of_shady_labor_practices_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How will the Boston shutdown affect workers?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/21/how_the_boston_shutdown_quietly_affected_the_working_poor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/21/how_the_boston_shutdown_quietly_affected_the_working_poor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2013 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First responders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[working class]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13277016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Labor leaders worry hourly workers will lose wages or vacation time for not making it to work during the shutdown ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Boston became a ghost town Friday, most of the city's residents stayed home from work and got a unexpected day off. Most, but not all. While Starbucks and Subways shuttered, select Dunkin’ Donuts stayed open at the requests of law enforcement, earning deserved <a href="https://twitter.com/MichelleFields/status/325381755647430656">praise</a> for the Boston-based chain. But while the chain was "encouraging our guests to stay home today," somebody had to come in to make the Dunkaccinos for the police officers, namely the low-wage workers who staff the stores.</p><p>And while they may have been happy to do come in despite the potential danger, eager to play whatever small part they could in the manhunt for someone who terrorized Boston, labor leaders say the case highlights how the bombing and its aftermath has affected workers in the Boston area this week.</p><p>"Most low wage workers can't afford to lose a day's pay, and there's no doubt this lockdown will adversely impact the city's working poor," said Jessica Kutch, a labor activist who co-founded the organizing site <a href="http://www.coworker.org/about_us">coworker.org</a>, in an email to Salon. "I'd really like to see employers state on the record that their hourly workers will be paid for the time they were scheduled to work today -- but I suspect that most employers will place the burden of this shutdown squarely on the backs of people who can least afford it."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/21/how_the_boston_shutdown_quietly_affected_the_working_poor/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/21/how_the_boston_shutdown_quietly_affected_the_working_poor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fixing Obama&#8217;s &#8220;fix it first&#8221; infrastructure plan</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/fix_it_fair_how_we_can_repair_our_infrastructure_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/fix_it_fair_how_we_can_repair_our_infrastructure_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 21:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13265990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the U.S. wants to create more jobs and compete with emerging markets, it can't focus on existing roads alone]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.bostonreview.net/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/12/title-e1356145289357.jpeg" alt="Boston Review" align="left" /></a>Seventy thousand bridges in America are structurally deficient. Fixing this and other critical problems with our national infrastructure is a policy no-brainer.</p><p>In this year’s State of the Union address, President Obama unveiled his “fix it first” plan, a $50 billion program for repairing the nation’s roads, highways, bridges and transit systems. Although this is a step in the right direction, the plan should also meet the concerns of the newly emerging transportation-justice movement, about which we have heard nothing from the president so far.</p><p>The Obama administration last directed major funds toward infrastructure as a part of the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). The government spent more than $31 billion, with a focus on “shovel-ready” projects.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/fix_it_fair_how_we_can_repair_our_infrastructure_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/fix_it_fair_how_we_can_repair_our_infrastructure_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>`Target the underemployed, not just the unemployed</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/bernstein_target_the_underemployed_not_just_unemployed_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/bernstein_target_the_underemployed_not_just_unemployed_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On the Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[underemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13265839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To reinvigorate the labor market, we have to help underutilized and part-time workers as well as those without jobs]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we wanted to target the persistent slack in the labor market, though I can’t see any signs that we do, we shouldn’t just target the unemployment rate; we should also go after the <em>under</em>employment rate.  Since it captures the important dimension of not just do you have a job, but are you getting the hours of work you want, it’s a more comprehensive measure of the extent to which workers are underutilized – i.e., slack – in the labor market.</p><p>The difference is pretty well known by now: the underemployment rate includes various groups of underutilized workers or job seekers who are left out of the official rate.  The largest difference is the inclusion of part-time workers who would rather have full-time jobs.  Most recently, there were about 8 million such folks, elevating this measure of underutilization to around 14 percent compared to about 8 percent for unemployment (2013Q1).  Other components of this rate include discouraged workers who’ve recently looked for work but given up, and some other smaller groups that are neither working nor looking for work but remain marginally attached to the job market.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/bernstein_target_the_underemployed_not_just_unemployed_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/bernstein_target_the_underemployed_not_just_unemployed_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liberals should fear Chris Christie</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/liberals_should_be_scared_of_chris_christie_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/liberals_should_be_scared_of_chris_christie_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 17:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Walker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13265861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The GOP all-star is far from a moderate -- he's a social progressive's worst nightmare]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two years ago, Gov. Scott Walker of Wisconsin introduced his falsely named "budget repair bill." In doing so, he transformed himself from an obscure Midwestern governor to the personification of a nationally orchestrated, well-funded right-wing movement that was more – much more -- than just an attempt to balance the budget on the backs of public service workers. His plan, concocted in quite public collaboration with the Koch brothers, was to gut public sector collective bargaining rights altogether.<br /> <a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a></p><p dir="ltr">The right had a new champion. Having weakened and nearly destroyed the private sector union movement in America over the last 30 years, it was time to home in on a new target: public sector unions and, in fact, the very idea that a fair society requires a robust public sphere. (Hint: This is true for the non-wealthy, less so for people who can buy their way into private schools, private beaches, private jets and so on.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/liberals_should_be_scared_of_chris_christie_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/liberals_should_be_scared_of_chris_christie_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NCAA tournament highlights America&#8217;s inequities</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/ncaa_no_tournament_of_champions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/ncaa_no_tournament_of_champions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ncaa basketball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCAA Tournament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Basketball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College basketball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13264309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[College sports is not a distraction from society's struggles -- it's a business that embodies them]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big-time sports are mirrors -- we blast our hopes, dreams, aspirations and fears at them knowing that part of their appeal is in how they metaphorically reflect back dramatized versions of real life. The Olympics becomes a proxy battle between our nation and the international boogeymen of the day. Professional leagues provide a safe forum for cities to express their all-too-real resentments against one another. The underdog players competing against better-equipped rivals embody our culture's populist David-versus-Goliath mythology.</p><p>This latter metaphor, with its impossible-to-predict outcomes and upsets, is supposed to define the NCAA's March basketball tournament. So obsessed are we by the "madness" of possible upsets and Cinderella stories that bracketology is now a national gambling ritual conducted in most workplaces, from the White House on down.</p><p>But what if March Madness is celebrating something that shouldn't be celebrated? What if the rags-to-riches, up-from-the-bootstraps metaphor that makes the tournament so appealing is the wrong one? What if, instead, the NCAA tournament is really a metaphor for something darker, more sinister and more disturbing about our society?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/ncaa_no_tournament_of_champions/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/ncaa_no_tournament_of_champions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fast food workers plan surprise strike</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/fast_food_workers_plan_surprise_strike/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/fast_food_workers_plan_surprise_strike/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fast food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fast food strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McDonalds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burger King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13260737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATED: Workers in some 70 restaurants expected to walk off job, potentially shutting down several eateries today]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Updated, 12:11 p.m.</strong>: The Fast Food Forward campaign says hundreds of workers are now out on strike, and that they are on track to have 400 strikers, from about 70 stores, by the end of the day. At least one store was unable to open for lack of employees this morning. Local politicians, including at least three mayoral candidates - City Council Speaker Christine Quinn, Comptroller John Liu, and Public Advocate Bill de Blasio - are expected to rally with the fast food workers. Striking workers are currently converging at a Wendy's in Midtown Manhattan, a Wendy's in Brooklyn, and a Burger King in Harlem. At 5:30 PM, strikers and supporters will gather in Harlem's Marcus Garvey Park and march to a McDonald's store for the day's largest event.</p><p>Asked for comment on the strike, spokespeople for McDonald's and the National Restaurant Association referred Salon to their statements from yesterday. In an e-mailed statement, de Blasio said, "Fast Food Forward is fighting for solutions for working people right here and now, and it deserves the support of all New Yorkers."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/fast_food_workers_plan_surprise_strike/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/fast_food_workers_plan_surprise_strike/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can immigration reform save the American workforce?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/can_immigration_reform_save_the_american_workforce_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/can_immigration_reform_save_the_american_workforce_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RobertReich.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFL-CIO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13259350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Legalizing undocumented workers would prevent employers from undercutting the country's largest unions]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their agreement on is very preliminary and hasn’t yet even been blessed by the so-called Gang of Eight Senators working on immigration reform, but the mere fact that AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka and Chamber of Commerce President Thomas J. Donohue agreed on anything is remarkable.</p><p>The question is whether it’s a good deal for American workers. It is, and I’ll explain why in a moment.</p><p>Under the agreement (arrived at last weekend) a limited number of temporary visas would be issued to foreign workers in low-skilled occupations, who could thereafter petition to become American citizens.</p><p>The agreement is an important step toward a comprehensive immigration reform package to be introduced in the Senate later this month. Disagreement over allowing in low-skilled workers helped derail immigration reform in 2007.</p><p>The unions don’t want foreign workers to take jobs away from Americans or depress American wages, while business groups obviously want the lowest-priced workers they can get their hands on.</p><p>So they’ve compromised on a maximum (no more than 20,000 visas in the first year, gradually increasing to no more than 200,000 in the fifth and subsequent years), with the actual number in any year depending on labor market conditions, as determined by the government. Priority would be given to occupations where American workers were in short supply.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/can_immigration_reform_save_the_american_workforce_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/can_immigration_reform_save_the_american_workforce_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paid sick leave: The next liberal litmus test?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/paid_sick_leave_the_next_liberal_litmus_test/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/paid_sick_leave_the_next_liberal_litmus_test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 16:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Working Ahead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philadelphia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Nutter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workers' Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ALEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13254794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Providing paid sick leave for workers is rapidly becoming a national Democratic priority. Oppose it at your peril]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There's a new must-support issue for ambitious Democrats across the nation: paid sick leave. And if you want to see how important it has become, just look to the current race for New York City mayor.</p><p>Before Thursday, City Council speaker Christine Quinn (generally an ally of Mayor Michael Bloomberg) <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/not-so-mighty-quinn-article-1.1215844">hemmed and hawed</a> for three years over whether to put forth a paid sick leave bill, despite the fact that eight in 10 New Yorkers support it. The issue placed her in an uncomfortable bind, trapped between Bloomberg and the business community (all of whom oppose it) -- and workers and unions on the other side.</p><p>But after previously using her power to block the bill (despite the majority of the City Council supporting it), Quinn realized her situation had become <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/27/nyregion/quinn-agrees-to-negotiate-on-paid-sick-leave.html?_r=0" target="_blank"> politically untenable</a>. And on Thursday, a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/29/nyregion/deal-reached-on-paid-sick-leave-in-new-york-city.html?hp&amp;_r=1&amp;">compromise was reached</a> that requires companies with 15 or more workers to offer employees at least five paid sick days. As the New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/29/nyregion/deal-reached-on-paid-sick-leave-in-new-york-city.html?hp&amp;_r=1&amp;">noted</a>, the deal represents a "raw display of political muscle by a coalition of labor unions and liberal activists.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/paid_sick_leave_the_next_liberal_litmus_test/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/paid_sick_leave_the_next_liberal_litmus_test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The art of labor</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/the_art_of_labor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/the_art_of_labor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFL-CIO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Working Ahead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Mondie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Symphony Orchestra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13251140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["There's no way I could be half the artist I am without the support of the union"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The video is brought to you by the AFL-CIO. To read the other stories in this series, click <a href="http://www.salon.com/category/working_ahead/">here.</a></em></p><p>Despite the common stereotype that unions only serve workers in manufacturing, construction and service industries, organized labor has a long history protecting the livelihoods of artists and performers. Jennifer Mondie, a veteran violist with the National Symphony Orchestra, puts it succintly: "There's no way I could be half the artist I am without the support of the union."</p><p>In the video above, Mondie explains how being a member of the American Federation of Musicians allows her to excel at her craft -- and she shares some beautiful music, as well.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/the_art_of_labor/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/the_art_of_labor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Defeating useless rich people</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/defeating_useless_rich_people/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/defeating_useless_rich_people/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Makers vs. Takers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[makers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real estate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13249268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Taming wealthy, unproductive "moochers" will require a populist campaign to stop them. Here's how we can do it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In two <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/private_sector_parasites/">previous</a> <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/how_rich_moochers_ruin_america/">columns</a>, I argued that left and right alike are confused by a failure to distinguish productive businesses that sell innovative goods and services from “rentier” interests — landlords, lenders, copyright holders and others — which use their natural or artificial monopoly power to extract excessive tolls, fees and other recurrent payments from the rest of society, including productive businesses. The fees or rents extracted by these interests constitute a kind of “private taxation” which — rather than public taxation — is the greatest threat facing America’s productive economy.</p><p>Today America’s powerful rentier interests, particularly those in the FIRE (finance, insurance and real estate) sector, are mobilizing campaign contributions and paid propaganda to promote what I called the Rentier Agenda: low taxes on those whose income is derived from capital gains; the privatization of public infrastructure and the deregulation of regulated private utilities, to generate windfall profits for investors in privatized or deregulated agencies; and a macroeconomic policy that serves the interests of creditors, at the expense of slow growth and mass unemployment, rather than productive businesses and workers. Similar observations have been made by many on the left and some mavericks on the right.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/defeating_useless_rich_people/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/defeating_useless_rich_people/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>101</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple kills a sweatshop app</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/apple_kills_a_sweatshop_app/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/apple_kills_a_sweatshop_app/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 18:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sweatshop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13249250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hypocrisy alert: Child labor and blocked fire escapes are somehow too offensive to be allowed on an iPad]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine you are the modern equivalent of Upton Sinclair, shopping your great muckracking novel about the working conditions of immigrants in a Chicago slaughterhouse, "The Jungle," around to publishers.</p><p>Except that unlike 1906, when there were multiple publishing houses, there's only one or two left in the entire world. And the biggest, most prestigious, most popular publisher in the world happens to have an editorial policy against "offensive" content. You can't get much more yucky than the turn-of-the-century Chicago meatpacking industry, so, Upton Sinclair,  you are out of luck. Try writing a romance novel, next time.</p><p>Crazy, huh? But that scenario came immediately to mind when I read about Apple's decision to reject a sweatshop game from its App Store, on the grounds of similar "offensiveness."</p><p>Pocket Gamer's Mark Brown <a href="http://www.pocketgamer.co.uk/r/iPad/Sweatshop+HD/news.asp?c=49468&amp;">has the story</a> (which I found out about via <a href="http://apple.slashdot.org/story/13/03/21/1516204/apple-yanks-sweatshop-themed-game-from-app-store?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Slashdot</a>).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/apple_kills_a_sweatshop_app/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/apple_kills_a_sweatshop_app/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s worker paradise</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/googles_worker_paradise/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/googles_worker_paradise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 21:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee perks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toni Morrison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Bieber]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13242677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In house visits from Justin Bieber? Free Pilates? How would Karl Marx explain this madness?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/10/30/google_brain/">I have been to Google's headquarters in California,</a> so the notion that the New York offices boast incredible employee perks does not surprise me.</p><p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/16/business/at-google-a-place-to-work-and-play.html?pagewanted=2&amp;_r=0&amp;hp">But <em>still</em>:</a></p><blockquote><p>And the perks, she added, are “amazing.” In the course of our brief conversation, she mentioned subsidized massages (with massage rooms on nearly every floor); free once-a-week eyebrow shaping; free yoga and Pilates classes; a course she took called “Unwind: the art and science of stress management”; a course in advanced negotiation taught by a Wharton professor; a health consultation and follow-up with a personal health counselor; an author series and an appearance by the novelist Toni Morrison; and a live interview of Justin Bieber by Jimmy Fallon in the Google office.</p></blockquote><p>In what universe do Toni Morrison and Justin Bieber get name-checked in the same sentence? And is that really a perk? What happens when you try to concentrate on "Beloved" but the lyrics of Bieber's "Baby" keep running through your head? Seems to me productivity would fall, directly.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/googles_worker_paradise/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/googles_worker_paradise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leaning in won&#8217;t help your career</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/leaning_in_wont_help_your_career_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/leaning_in_wont_help_your_career_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 12:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheryl Sandberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marissa Mayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13230022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you want a better job, unionize]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, Facebook executive Sheryl Sandberg didn’t say “join a union.” But that’s the message the vast majority of working women should be considering this Women’s History Month. The best way for the most women to improve their working lives is through a union.</p><p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" /></a>The new PBS documentary <a href="http://www.makers.com/"><em>Makers: Women Who Make America</em></a> shows how the women's movement changed the workplace for women, men and families. Two of the young <em>Makers</em> highlighted in the film, Sheryl Sandberg at Facebook and Marissa Mayer at Yahoo, now dominate the news. Here's what neither of them tell you: union women earn more than non-union women and have better benefits and working conditions.</p><p>Women at Facebook and Yahoo should consider spending their time organizing to have a say in their workplace.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/leaning_in_wont_help_your_career_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/leaning_in_wont_help_your_career_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
