<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Labor Rights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/labor_rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 19:43:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How shoppers can help prevent Bangladesh-type disasters</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/how_shoppers_can_help_prevent_bangladesh_type_disasters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/how_shoppers_can_help_prevent_bangladesh_type_disasters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bangladesh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bangladesh Garment Factory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walmart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adidas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287918</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In wake of the garment factory tragedy, here's what ethical clothing consumers can do via the global supply chain]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While rescue workers continue to dig through the rubble of Rana Plaza, the collapsed Bangladeshi garment factory responsible for the deaths of 433 people (and counting), Americans are faced yet again with the stark reality of consumer culpability in these disasters.</p><p>Major clothing retailers like Wal-Mart, Joe Fresh, JCPenney and the Children's Place were each found to have <a href="http://business.time.com/2013/05/02/bangladesh-factory-collapse-is-there-blood-on-your-shirt/">subcontracted manufacturing</a> to the crumbling factory in Savar, where workers were making an average of $38 a month and coerced to report to work even after the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/bangladesh_building_collapse_toll_climbs_to_433_ap/singleton/">walls of the building were literally falling apart</a>. In November, fire ravaged another garment factory near the capital city of Dhaka, leaving 112 dead. Again, pieces of clothing from Sears, the Walt Disney Co. and other major retailers were found among the scorched remains.</p><p>In the aftermath of such tragic, and preventable, losses of life, many consumers are left asking themselves what role they can play in discouraging disasters like this from happening again. And, fortunately, there are answers. The collective power of workers is a real thing, and the collective power of consumers is, too.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/how_shoppers_can_help_prevent_bangladesh_type_disasters/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/how_shoppers_can_help_prevent_bangladesh_type_disasters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Safety inspections in U.S. supply chains a &#8220;facade&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/safety_inspections_in_u_s_supply_chains_a_facade/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/safety_inspections_in_u_s_supply_chains_a_facade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 14:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFL-CIO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[working conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supply chains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate responsibility]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13279537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A report from the AFL-CIO claims corporate-funded audits help keep wages low, working conditions poor abroad]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new 60-page report from the AFL-CIO condemns corporate-funded auditing programs, which are intended to assess working conditions along the supply chains of major American companies. According to the scathing review, auditors enable corporations to run factories in places like Pakistan, Indonesia, China and Latin America with poor, unsafe working conditions, while paying low wages. The audits, says the report, are a "facade" that provide "public relations cover for producers whose disregard for health and safety has cost hundreds of lives."</p><p>Via the report, titled "Responsibility Outsourced":</p><blockquote><p>The failure of governments to protect workers’ rights in the global economy has left a yawning gap of regulation and helped spawn an $80 billion industry in corporate social responsibility (CSR) and social auditing. yet the experience of the last two decades of “privatized regulation” of global supply chains has eerie parallels with the financial self-regulation that failed so spectacularly in 2007 and plunged the world into deep and lasting recession...</p> <p>Many of the best-established CSR brands, such as the Fair Labor Association and Social Accountability International, are funded by big corporations and sometimes even by government subsidy. This report shows how the overwhelming influence of the company bottom line has dominated the agendas of the FLA, SAI and similar groups, while the workers who are supposed to benefit from CSR have been marginalized or altogether ignored.</p> <p>The fact that a garment factory in Pakistan could get SAI certification based on some phone calls and some meetings outside Pakistan, and yet be so dangerous that a September 2012 fire killed nearly 300 workers, should have led to a complete overhaul of the CSR industry. But there is no sign the root and branch reform needed will actually happen. All the indications are that it is business as usual for CSR.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/safety_inspections_in_u_s_supply_chains_a_facade/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/safety_inspections_in_u_s_supply_chains_a_facade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ALEC makes public hundreds of &#8220;model&#8221; bills</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/alec_makes_public_hundreds_of_model_bills/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/alec_makes_public_hundreds_of_model_bills/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 21:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ALEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[model legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right-to-work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charter schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stand-Your-Ground]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transparency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13242734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The shady lobby group has published pre-written legislation under pressure from watchdog coalition]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's been public knowledge for a number of years that the American Legislative Exchange Council is responsible for writing model legislation for major industries and then pushing them, through Republican lawmakers, into statehouses nationwide. Until these model bills pop up on legislative agendas, however, little is known about the group's legislation penning.</p><p>On Friday, following a two-year campaign by watchdog groups, ALEC published hundreds of its model bills online. The coalition of organizations pushing for greater transparency included the Center for Media and Democracy, ColorOfChange, Common Cause, Greenpeace, People for the American Way, Progress Now and a variety of labor organizations.</p><p>The full list of model bills is available<a href="http://www.alec.org/model-legislation/"> here</a>. It includes template bills pertaining to charter schools, climate (mis)education, union-busting right to work bills, workplace drug testing laws and more.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/alec_makes_public_hundreds_of_model_bills/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/alec_makes_public_hundreds_of_model_bills/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>At Apple&#8217;s request, Foxconn&#8217;s unions strengthened</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/04/at_apples_request_foxconns_unions_strengthened/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/04/at_apples_request_foxconns_unions_strengthened/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 19:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foxconn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13190608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Apple manufacturer came under heavy scrutiny after a spate of employee suicides]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TAIPEI, Taiwan (AP) — Taiwan-owned Foxconn Technology Group, a leading maker of Apple's iPhones and gadgets for other global brands, is widening the scope of union elections at its sprawling facilities in China.</p><p>The move, confirmed by the company Monday, follows a series of recommendations from an international panel hired by Apple to audit conditions for the 1.2 million workers in Foxconn's mainland factories.</p><p>Foxconn said it will deepen employees' involvement in union elections so the unions can more effectively represent their interests. It said it hopes this will impact labor standards throughout China.</p><p>Foxconn previously came under heavy scrutiny for labor policies that allegedly led a dozen workers to commit suicide. It has also faced increasing protests and strikes as Chinese workers become increasingly aware of labor rights.</p><p><script type='text/javascript' src='http://pshared.5min.com/Scripts/PlayerSeed.js?sid=1236&amp;width=420&amp;height=280&amp;shuffle=0&amp;playList=517617632'></script></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/04/at_apples_request_foxconns_unions_strengthened/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/04/at_apples_request_foxconns_unions_strengthened/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Target locks in graveyard shift workers at night</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/25/target_locks_in_graveyard_shift_workers_at_night/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/25/target_locks_in_graveyard_shift_workers_at_night/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 20:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Target]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wal-Mart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSHA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13182238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[25 janitors say they were regularly locked indoors while cleaning stores]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Labor writer Josh Eidelson <a href="http://www.thenation.com/blog/172426/ohsa-charges-workers-were-locked-inside-target-stores-overnight#">reported</a> for the Nation Friday that Target regularly locked late-night workers indoors while they cleaned stores in Minneapolis and St. Paul. Charges have been filed against the retail giant with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), a federal agency charged with the enforcement of safety and health legislation.</p><p>“At 11 at night, I would ring the doorbell to get let in, and then from there, we would be locked in the store all night, until 7 am when they opened the store,” Honorio Hernandez, who cleaned Target stores for three years, told Eidelson. Hernandez said that generally at night, only one manager oversees the premises, and "in an emergency, workers would have needed to get the manager to unlock a door and let them out of the building."</p><p>Via the Nation:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/25/target_locks_in_graveyard_shift_workers_at_night/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/25/target_locks_in_graveyard_shift_workers_at_night/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple audit finds child workers in China</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/25/apple_audit_finds_child_workers_in_china/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/25/apple_audit_finds_child_workers_in_china/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 17:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foxconn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13181897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The tech giant drops a manufacturer after dozens of underage workers discovered]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple has vowed to route out children from its vast workforce after an audit in China revealed one of the company's component makers employed over 70 underage workers. The tech giant increased its audits by 72 percent in 2012 following numerous scandals emerging over working conditions in its Chinese factories, including a spate of suicides in manufacturer Foxconn factories in 2010.</p><p>"While child labor reflected a small percentage of the workforce, Apple is investigating its smaller suppliers – which typically supply parts to larger suppliers and hence face less scrutiny – to bring them into compliance," Reuters reported. Apple's senior vice-president of operations, Jeff Williams, said that the company was increasing efforts to look "deep in the supply chain" to check for child workers. "When we do find it, we ensure that the underage workers are taken care of, the suppliers are dealt with," he said.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;<script type='text/javascript' src='http://pshared.5min.com/Scripts/PlayerSeed.js?sid=1236&amp;width=420&amp;height=280&amp;shuffle=0&amp;playList=517246821'></script></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/25/apple_audit_finds_child_workers_in_china/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/25/apple_audit_finds_child_workers_in_china/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Union membership continues long decline</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/union_membership_continues_long_decline/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/union_membership_continues_long_decline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 20:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right-to-work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13179880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Political assaults and huge public sector membership drops make for the lowest union density since the 1930s]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New numbers from the Bureau of Labor Statistics show that union membership continued to decline in 2012, reaching its lowest point since 1933. Losses in both public and private sector unions saw the total percentage of union density fall from 11.8 percent to 11.3 percent last year. More than half the loss, the AP <a href="http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_22432193/unions-suffer-steep-decline-membership">noted,</a> "came from government workers including teachers, firefighters and public administrators," which accounted for a membership drop of 234,000.</p><p>The Koch-backed political assault against unions by both public and private sector has also gained ground in recent years, with state legislatures in Wisconsin, Michigan and Indiana voting through measures that weaken unions. AFL-CIO president Richard Trumka released a <a href="http://www.aflcio.org/Press-Room/Press-Releases/Statement-by-AFL-CIO-President-Richard-Trumka-On-Bureau-of-Labor-Statistics-2012-Union-Membership-Numbers">statement</a> in response to the new statistics, lamenting, "Working women and men urgently need a voice on the job today, but the sad truth is that it has become more difficult for them to have one, as today’s figures on union membership demonstrate.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/union_membership_continues_long_decline/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/union_membership_continues_long_decline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tweeting workers of the world, unite!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/22/twittering_workers_of_the_world_unite/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/22/twittering_workers_of_the_world_unite/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 19:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nlrb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workers' Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13178744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Employers can't fire workers for collectively criticizing their workplace online]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Until recently in the private sector, management has had total discretion as to whether employees can be fired for what they post on Facebook or Twitter about their company. Indeed, companies regularly have social media policies that discourage public online criticism by employees on personal social media platforms.</p><p>But, as the New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/22/technology/employers-social-media-policies-come-under-regulatory-scrutiny.html?pagewanted=2&amp;_r=0&amp;hp">reported </a>Tuesday, "in a series of recent rulings and advisories, labor regulators have declared many such blanket restrictions illegal. The National Labor Relations Board says workers have a right to discuss work conditions freely and without fear of retribution, whether the discussion takes place at the office or on Facebook."</p><p>The Times noted that the NLRB will enforce an end to restrictive online speech policies and will ensure companies rehire workers fired for social media comments. However, as Josh Eidelson <a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2012/07/getting_fired_for_what_you_post_on_facebook.html">noted last year</a> for Slate when a number of cases brought the issue of social media comments to the NLRB's attention, the issue is not over whether an individual worker can be fired for critical comments on social media, but whether a group of workers collectively discussing their company can be protected from retribution:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/22/twittering_workers_of_the_world_unite/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/22/twittering_workers_of_the_world_unite/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vets will have &#8220;a place to go,&#8221; but it&#8217;s Wal-Mart</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/15/vets_will_have_a_place_to_go_but_its_wal_mart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/15/vets_will_have_a_place_to_go_but_its_wal_mart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 15:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wal-Mart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strikes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[veterans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13171602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The retail giant, facing growing dissent over poor pay and conditions, will hire more than 100,000 veterans]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the next five years, every veteran who has recently left the armed forces can get a job with Wal-Mart. The new initiative, announced by Wal-Mart CEO, and former Marine, William Simon promises to hire more than 100,000 vets in the largest hiring commitment for former service members in history.</p><p>As the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/15/us/wal-mart-to-announce-extensive-plan-to-hire-veterans.html">New York Times noted</a>, "the unemployment rate for veterans of the recent wars has remained stubbornly above that for nonveterans, though it has been falling steadily, dropping to just below 10 percent for all of 2012. That was down from 12.1 percent the year before. The year-end unemployment rate for nonveterans was 7.9 percent in 2012." On any given night roughly 68,000 vets are homeless in the United States, and studies have found that vets on average stay homeless longer than nonvets. Clearly, for many thousands of young men and women returning from the America's protracted Middle East battles, finding security and stability is a struggle.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/15/vets_will_have_a_place_to_go_but_its_wal_mart/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/15/vets_will_have_a_place_to_go_but_its_wal_mart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NYC school bus drivers strike for job security</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/15/nyc_school_bus_drivers_strike_for_job_security/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/15/nyc_school_bus_drivers_strike_for_job_security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 14:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[school bus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[school bus strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13171529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yellow buses will stay off the streets Wednesday in a dispute that distills austerity city budgeting ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Wednesday the school bus drivers of New York City are going on strike. The strike, threatened for weeks, comes as a result of disputes over certain job protections absent from new bus company contracts.</p><p>Local 1181 of the Amalgamated Transit Union expects more than 8,000 bus drivers and matrons to strike, affected over 150,000 school children. As was the case during the week-long Chicago teachers strike last, city officials are framing the strike in terms of harm done to children and parents.</p><p>"With its regrettable decision to strike, the union is abandoning 152,000 students and their families who rely on school bus service each day," Mayor Michael Bloomberg said in a statement. The city is providing free Metro cards Wednesday to students and parents affected by the strike and reimbursed private transport for special needs children.</p><p>The walkout was precipitated by the city's push to privatize their yellow buses. In an attempt to cut spending on transportation, the city has put bus contracts with private bus companies up for bid. The drivers union has vociferously opposed the move, arguing that drivers will be thrown into precarity if new bus companies win city contracts and don't hire them. Mayor Bloomberg has stressed that job protection clauses to allay these concerns cannot legally be written in to private contracts.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/15/nyc_school_bus_drivers_strike_for_job_security/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/15/nyc_school_bus_drivers_strike_for_job_security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Labor mural removed by Maine gov. back on display</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/labor_mural_removed_by_maine_gov_back_on_display_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/labor_mural_removed_by_maine_gov_back_on_display_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 20:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13170935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The mural that gov. Paul LePage claimed "presented a one-sided view that bowed to organized labor" was restored]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AUGUSTA, Maine (AP) — A mural depicting scenes from Maine's labor history returned to public display Monday, 22 months after the governor set off a political firestorm and spawned a federal lawsuit by ordering it removed.</p><p>Gov. Paul LePage caused an uproar in March 2011 when he ordered the mural removed from the Labor Department lobby, claiming it presented a one-sided view that bowed to organized labor and overlooked the contributions of job-creating entrepreneurs.</p><p>Beginning Monday, the mural was back on public view in an atrium that serves as the entryway to the Maine State Museum, Maine State Library and Maine State Archives. The space is open to the public six days a week.</p><p>Richard Bamforth, of Augusta, was angry when LePage first ordered the mural removed, calling it silly and petty. But he acknowledged the new venue seemed to be more appropriate than a hidden-away state office building.</p><p>"This is a much more visually appealing setting, I think," he said as he, his wife and their 19-year-old granddaughter examined the mural in the spacious, well-lit atrium.</p><p>The 11-panel mural had been bolted to the walls in the Labor Department building since 2008, when Democratic Gov. John Baldacci was in office. It was created by artist Judy Taylor, of Tremont, using a $60,000 grant from the U.S. Department of Labor.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/labor_mural_removed_by_maine_gov_back_on_display_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/labor_mural_removed_by_maine_gov_back_on_display_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Domestic workers worldwide lack legal protections</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/09/domestic_workers_worldwide_lack_legal_protections/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/09/domestic_workers_worldwide_lack_legal_protections/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 17:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domestic work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Domestic Workers Alliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ILO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13166004</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new report by a U.N. labor agency finds poor working conditions and insufficient protections plague domestic work]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Domestic work accounts for 7.5 percent of women's waged employment worldwide, but is regularly characterized by poor working conditions and insufficient legal protection, according to a <a href="http://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/newsroom/news/WCMS_200937/lang--en/index.htm">new report </a>from the U.N.'s International Labor Organization (ILO) released Wednesday.</p><p>Over 52 million people -- predominantly women --  worldwide are employed as domestic workers, an increase of over 19 million workers since the mid-1990s, according to the report, which notes that its figures are likely considerable underestimations as the domestic workforce is hard to accurately survey. Of these millions of workers, ILO found, "only 10 percent of all domestic workers (or 5.3 million) are covered by general labor legislation to the same extent as other workers. By contrast, more than one-quarter – 29.9 percent, or some 15.7 million domestic workers – are completely excluded from the scope of national labor legislation."</p><p>The report highlighted "working time" as one of the biggest problems for the domestic workforce: "More than half of all domestic workers have no limitation on their weekly normal hours under national law, and approximately 45 percent have no entitlement to weekly rest periods."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/09/domestic_workers_worldwide_lack_legal_protections/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/09/domestic_workers_worldwide_lack_legal_protections/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The myth of conflict-free diamonds</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/07/the_myth_of_conflict_free_diamonds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/07/the_myth_of_conflict_free_diamonds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 18:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diamonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conflict diamonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blood diamonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13163664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new report reveals how a lack of regulation has made separating clean from dirty gems nearly impossible]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a recent <a href="http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2013/01/02/rough_cut?page=0,0&amp;wp_login_redirect=0" target="_blank">piece</a> in Foreign Policy, the odds are a staggering 1 in 4 that a diamond on the market today is a conflict stone. What's even more troubling: It's become nearly impossible to tell the difference between the clean and dirty gems.</p><p>After being shipped in from Africa, Central Asia, and other mining hot spots, thousands of diamonds end up in Surat everyday, a growing metropolis in the Indian state of Gujarat. Once there, stones of different origins -- both legal and illegal -- are mixed together to get<strong> </strong>cut and polished inside the city's many microfactories. As Foreign Policy's Jason Miklian <a href="http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2013/01/02/rough_cut?page=0,0&amp;wp_login_redirect=0" target="_blank">writes</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/07/the_myth_of_conflict_free_diamonds/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/07/the_myth_of_conflict_free_diamonds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wal-Mart to bring questionable oversight to U.S. warehouses</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/walmart_to_bring_questionable_oversight_to_us_warehouses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/walmart_to_bring_questionable_oversight_to_us_warehouses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walmart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bangladesh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Factory fire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strikes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The retailer will audit labor conditions, using system similar to one that that oversaw Bangladeshi fire factory]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Following an unprecedented wave of strikes throughout its U.S. supply chain at the end of last year, Wal-Mart has introduced a new plan for audits of labor conditions in its U.S. distribution centers. As Josh Eidelson <a href="http://www.thenation.com/blog/172018/labor-groups-pan-walmart-plan-bring-oversight-approach-used-bangladesh-us#">highlighted </a>Thursday for the Nation, the plans, which are similar to audits in place for Wal-Mart's distribution centers overseas, have been widely panned by labor groups.</p><p>Reportedly poor, unsafe working conditions in the retail giant's U.S. warehouses led last year to repeated strikes and threats of legal action by subcontracted workers. According to Eidelson, however, labor groups are unimpressed by Wal-Mart's response -- namely that Wal-Mart would employ the system it uses to monitor international distribution warehouses to monitor U.S. ones. The move seems particularly striking in the wake of a deadly fire in one of Wal-Mart's Bangladeshi distribution centers in which 112 workers died. Via the Nation:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/walmart_to_bring_questionable_oversight_to_us_warehouses/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/walmart_to_bring_questionable_oversight_to_us_warehouses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>JFK workers threaten strike next week</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/jfk_workers_threaten_strike_next_week/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/jfk_workers_threaten_strike_next_week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 15:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JFK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Airport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security guards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13124990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Non-unionized security guards threaten holiday walkout, demanding training and equipment concerns be addressed]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div> <p>NEW YORK –  Some security guards at John F. Kennedy International Airport have voted to go on strike next week if their employer doesn't respond to their concerns over issues including training and equipment.</p> <p>Security worker Prince Jackson said about 100 employees of Air Serv Corporation voted Thursday to authorize a strike for Dec. 20. The employees are not unionized.</p> <p>Another group of workers, for Global Elite Group, is scheduled to hold a vote on Friday.</p> <p>Air Serv said it plans to speak to its employees about their concerns in the coming days and weeks. Global Elite said its management is in constant dialogue with its staff.</p> <p>The workers handle security issues for the facilities, such as directing traffic in front of the terminals and making sure non-passenger areas like the tarmacs are secure.</p> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/jfk_workers_threaten_strike_next_week/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/jfk_workers_threaten_strike_next_week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unions and conservatives eye the next labor battleground</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/unions_and_conservatives_eye_the_next_labor_battleground/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/unions_and_conservatives_eye_the_next_labor_battleground/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 17:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right-to-work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Koch Brothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[union busting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13123903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whether right-to-work legislation is pushed next in Ohio or elsewhere, the battle will be fierce]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The passing in Michigan of right-to-work legislation delivered a severe blow this week to the labor movement. Now as union activists and their supporters strategize on how to push back against the national, Koch-backed onslaught against labor rights, right-to-work advocates seek their next battleground.</p><p>According to a<a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2012/12/labors-plan-to-fight-back-84948_Page3.html"> report by </a>Alexander Burns and Maggie Haberman at Politico, the union counteroffensive is setting its sights on fighting conservative state leaders in next year's gubernatorial elections, particularly in the Midwest. Via Politico:</p><blockquote><p>The AFL-CIO has already built up sizable campaign operations in Pennsylvania, Florida, Nevada and Wisconsin – the site of a titanic 2012 gubernatorial recall fight – in addition to Ohio and Michigan, union officials said. The labor giant deployed new staff to those states about a year ago as part of what AFL-CIO chief Richard Trumka has called the “permanent infrastructure” of national unions.</p> <p>... Labor leaders have vowed to make Snyder regret signing the “right to work” law he approved this week. Beyond Michigan, Ohio Gov. John Kasich and Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Corbett have appeared vulnerable in polling.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/unions_and_conservatives_eye_the_next_labor_battleground/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/unions_and_conservatives_eye_the_next_labor_battleground/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thousands to rally against Michigan right-to-work</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/thousands_to_rally_against_michigan_right_to_work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/thousands_to_rally_against_michigan_right_to_work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right-to-work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Koch Brothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[union busting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13121216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATED: The Republican-majority House passes both union-busting bills and Gov. Snyder defends his support]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>UPDATE 2.30 p.m. (EST):</strong> Gov. Rick Snyder spoke to MSNBC following the House votes and reiterated his vow to sigh right-to-work bills into law. Host Andrea Mitchell pushed the Republican governor on the fact that right-to-work had not been a campaign issue. He responded that his decision to back the union-busting legislation followed a failed attempt by labor leaders in the state to extend collective bargaining rights through a bill called Proposal 2. Snyder told Mitchell:</p><blockquote><p>Well, the voters spoke in November and dramatically voted down Proposal 2, but then this right to work discussion just continued to escalate and was becoming very divisive. So the way I viewed it is, it's on the table. It's a hot issue. Let's show some leadership. So I stepped up to say when I review it, I think it's a good thing. It's about being pro-worker. It’s about giving freedom of choice to workers.</p></blockquote><p>Watch a clip of the interview via MSNBC below.</p><p><strong>UPDATE 1.50 p.m. (EST):</strong> The Michigan House has approved both right-to-work bills, pertaining to both public and private sector workers, and the legislation will now be sent to Gov. Rick Snyder, who vowed he would sing the bills into law.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/thousands_to_rally_against_michigan_right_to_work/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/thousands_to_rally_against_michigan_right_to_work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Labor rights in Michigan blindsided by GOP</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/labor_rights_in_michigan_blindsided_by_gop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/labor_rights_in_michigan_blindsided_by_gop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 17:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right-to-work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Snyder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[union busting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13118152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Thursday night, GOP lawmakers backed by Koch brothers voted through a Right-to-Work bill announced that morning]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last night Republican legislators backed by the Koch brothers delivered a harsh blow to the union heartland of Michigan. Right-to-work legislation was pushed through both the state House and Senate by Republican majorities, while powerless and furious protesters looked on.</p><p>It was a sneak move -- GOP lawmakers only announced Thursday morning that they intended to enact the so-called right-to-work bill (aptly described by its opponents as the "no-rights-at-work" bill). Right-to-work laws ban requirements to pay dues or fees to a union as a condition of employment --  studies have consistently shown that states with right-to-work laws have lower wages for union and non-union workers.</p><p>As a study by <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/2012/12/06/wall-street-journal-pushes-myths-about-wage-low/191720">Elise Gould and Heidi Shierholz of the Economic Policy Institute found</a>:</p><blockquote><p>[O]ur findings -- that "right-to-work" laws are associated with significantly lower wages and reduced chances of receiving employer-sponsored health insurance and pensions -- are based on the most rigorous statistical analysis currently possible. These findings should discourage right-to-work policy initiatives. The fact is, while RTW legislation misleadingly sounds like a positive change in this weak economy, in reality the opportunity it gives workers is only that to work for lower wages and fewer benefits.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/labor_rights_in_michigan_blindsided_by_gop/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/labor_rights_in_michigan_blindsided_by_gop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wal-Mart wouldn&#8217;t pay for Bangladeshi factory safety improvements</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/wal_mart_wouldnt_pay_for_bangladeshi_factory_safety_improvements/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/wal_mart_wouldnt_pay_for_bangladeshi_factory_safety_improvements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 18:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wal-Mart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bangladesh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Factory fire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Garment workers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloomberg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13117122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before a factory fire that killed 112, the retailer had decided supplier fire safety was too expensive to cover]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At a meeting in April 2011, more than a dozen retailers including Wal-Mart, Gap, Target and JC Penney met in Dhaka to discuss safety at their supplier Bangladeshi garment factories. Bloomberg News <a href="http://mobile.bloomberg.com/news/2012-12-05/wal-mart-nixed-paying-bangladesh-suppliers-to-fight-fire.html">revealed </a>minutes from this meeting Wednesday, which show that Wal-Mart nixed a plan that would require retailers to pay their suppliers enough to cover safety improvements.</p><p>Last month, a fire in a factory <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/26/wal_marts_connection_to_firetrap_bangladesh_factory_is_unclear/">used by</a> Wal-Mart killed 112 workers. There were no fire exits. Despite the fact that more than 700 Bangladeshi garment workers have died since 2005, Wal-Mart and Gap refused last year to pay higher costs for safety. Bloomberg cited comments from a document produced by Wal-mart’s director of ethical sourcing and a Gap official for the Dhaka meeting. It stated:</p><p>"Specifically to the issue of any corrections on electrical and fire safety, we are talking about 4,500 factories, and in most cases very extensive and costly modifications would need to be undertaken to some factories. It is not financially feasible for the brands to make such investments.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/wal_mart_wouldnt_pay_for_bangladeshi_factory_safety_improvements/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/wal_mart_wouldnt_pay_for_bangladeshi_factory_safety_improvements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LA, Long Beach Ports strike ends</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/la_long_beach_ports_strike_ends/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/la_long_beach_ports_strike_ends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 13:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Long Beach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ILWU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shipping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles and Long Beach Ports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13115206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The strike, which crippled America's largest shipping hub, aimed to end outsourcing of union jobs]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clerical workers at the twin ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach will return to work Wednesday after an eight day strike which crippled America's largest shipping port. Federal mediators from Washington were called in earlier this week to aid negotiations between striking International Longshore and Warehouse Union Local 63 members and terminal operators. The deal, details of which are not yet public, awaits ratification by the union.</p><p>As the Los Angeles Times <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-1205-ports-talks-20121205,0,7425017.story">reported</a>:</p><blockquote><p>It ends a grueling battle between both sides that threatened to damage the fragile U.S. economy. Since the strike began, 20 ships diverted to rival ports in Oakland, Ensenada and Panama, while other freighters docked offshore waiting for a resolution... The strike began Nov. 27 as the clerical workers' union voiced frustration about shipping line employers outsourcing jobs, an accusation the Harbor Employers Assn. has denied.</p> <p>Though the union is small, it was backed by the 10,000 regional members of the ILWU, which honored the picket line and refused to work. By the end, the strike shut down 10 of the 14 cargo container terminals at the nation's busiest seaport complex.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/la_long_beach_ports_strike_ends/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/la_long_beach_ports_strike_ends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>