<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Lance Armstrong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/lance_armstrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:06:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>7 most loathsome commencement speeches</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/7_most_loathsome_commencement_speeches_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/7_most_loathsome_commencement_speeches_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lance Armstrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jamie Dimon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ivan Boesky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[berkeley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tufts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13313816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lance Armstrong's 2006 address at Tufts is aging about as poorly as you'd expect]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" /></a></p><p dir="ltr">It’s that time of year. The sun is shining, the flowers are in bloom and all across America, graduating students are forced to endure that dreaded rite of passage, the commencement speech. Often boring, typically clichéd and frequently self-aggrandizing, commencement speeches form their own subgenre of fatuous prose.</p><p>Get out the barf bag! Here are a few choice orations from some of America’s most illustrious jerks.</p><p><strong>1. Ivan Boesky at Berkeley, 1986</strong></p><p>Ivan Boesky was a big-time stock trader who hustled his way to riches betting on corporate takeovers. On May 18, 1986 at the University of California, Berkeley, he <a href="http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1986-12-15/features/8604030634_1_ivan-boeskys-greed-fund">shared</a> these lustrous pearls of wisdom with business school students:</p><blockquote><p>“Greed is all right, by the way. I want you to know that. I think greed is healthy. You can be greedy and still feel good about yourself.”</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/7_most_loathsome_commencement_speeches_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/7_most_loathsome_commencement_speeches_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Postal Service to Lance Armstrong: Pay up!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/postal_service_to_lance_armstrong_pay_up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/postal_service_to_lance_armstrong_pay_up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lance Armstrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tour de France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oprah Winfrey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nascar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POstal service]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13280716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The USPS claims disgraced cyclist "unjustly enriched" himself. But why did they sponsor him in the first place?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Lance Armstrong beatdown continues apace. The disgraced former cycling superstar, who recently capped several years of vehement, passionate denials of doping with a half-assed admission and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/18/lance_armstrongs_unmoving_confession/">a mea culpa to Oprah Winfre</a>y, has been trying to salvage his decimated public image. After withdrawing from his leadership role at his Livestrong charity and losing sponsors faster <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/is_jimmy_fallon_nbcs_last_best_hope/">than NBC can lose viewers</a>, he's made a few noises about returning to competition, but has largely receded from the public eye.</p><p>But Armstrong has not been forgotten – especially by the U.S. government. On Tuesday, the Justice Department filed a 28-page complaint against the man, detailing what USA Today plain-spokenly refers to as "several years of lying, cheating and manipulating" Uncle Sam during the six years he was sponsored by the Postal Service.</p><p>The suit claims "the USPS paid approximately $40 million to sponsor [Armstrong's] USPS cycling team from 1998 to 2004," a period Armstrong is charged with using "prohibited drugs" in violation of his contract. Under the False Claims Act, Armstrong could be held accountable for $100 million in damages. On the bright side, it looks like the government has come up with a plan to help the economy.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/postal_service_to_lance_armstrong_pay_up/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/postal_service_to_lance_armstrong_pay_up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lance Armstrong returns to competitive sports as swimmer</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/lance_armstrong_returns_to_competitive_sports_as_swimmer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/lance_armstrong_returns_to_competitive_sports_as_swimmer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swimming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lance Armstrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance enhancing drugs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13261331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The disgraced cyclist will compete in a US Masters event, which does not test for performance enhancing drugs]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disgraced cyclist Lance Armstrong, who in 2012 was <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/18/lance_armstrong_comes_clean/">stripped of his seven Tour de France titles</a> after it was discovered he was using performance enhancing drugs, is returning to competitive sports--as a swimmer. Armstrong, 41, is set to compete in three races this weekend at the Masters South Central Zone Swimming Championships at the University of Texas.</p><p>From the <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/general/others/disgraced-cyclist-lance-armstrong-to-make-return-to-competitive-sport-as-swimmer-8559607.html">Independent</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/lance_armstrong_returns_to_competitive_sports_as_swimmer/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/lance_armstrong_returns_to_competitive_sports_as_swimmer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justice Dept. joining fraud suit against Lance Armstrong</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/22/justice_dept_joining_fraud_suit_against_lance_armstrong/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/22/justice_dept_joining_fraud_suit_against_lance_armstrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 18:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lance Armstrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance enhancing drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13208865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The lawsuit alleges that the disgraced cyclist defrauded the U.S. Postal Service, a long-time sponsor]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) -- Lawyers for Lance Armstrong say the Justice Department has joined a lawsuit against the cyclist. The lawsuit alleges the former Tour de France champion concealed his use of performance-enhancing drugs for over a decade and defrauded his long-time sponsor, the U.S. Postal Service.</p><p>The suit the Justice Department is joining was filed in 2010 by former teammate Floyd Landis, who was stripped of his 2006 Tour de France title for doping.</p><p>An Armstrong lawyer, Robert Luskin, said Friday that negotiations with the government failed because "we disagree about whether the postal service was damaged."</p><p>Said Luskin: "The postal service's own studies show that the service benefited tremendously from its sponsorship - benefits totaling more than $100 million."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/22/justice_dept_joining_fraud_suit_against_lance_armstrong/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/22/justice_dept_joining_fraud_suit_against_lance_armstrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We enabled Lance</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/21/how_we_enabled_lance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/21/how_we_enabled_lance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 20:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lance Armstrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Livestrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steroids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13177595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[His success fit a pernicious cancer narrative: That he "beat" it as if it were a test of character, not a disease]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During his confessional interview with Oprah Winfrey last week, the deposed cycling champion Lance Armstrong described telling his 13-year-old son Luke about having used performance-enhancing drugs. What made the belated admission “even sicker,” Armstrong acknowledged, is that during all the years of denial Luke had “trusted me.”</p><p>It is simple enough to understand why a child would reflexively believe a parent’s protests of being falsely accused. The better, tougher question is why the rest of us took Armstrong at his word, or just dodged the whole subject, as evidence of his cheating built over the course of a decade.</p><p>Yes, we know that Armstrong protected himself, his image, and his Livestrong charity in part by threatening and intimidating the journalists and former teammates who contended that he had doped in order to win his seven Tour de France titles. And, yes, we know that the tens of millions of dollars that Armstrong raised for cancer research granted him a wide cushion from scrutiny.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/21/how_we_enabled_lance/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/21/how_we_enabled_lance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why do we care if Lance apologizes?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/20/why_do_we_care_if_lance_apologizes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/20/why_do_we_care_if_lance_apologizes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lance Armstrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lance Armstrong doping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bicycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[christ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Confessionalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apol]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13176456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our deranged, pseudo-Christian pop culture demanded a performance of repentance Lance Armstrong couldn't deliver]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the right-wingers are correct after all about America being a Christian nation -- but not quite in the way they think. One conclusion I draw from the sordid tale of <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/lance_armstrong/">Lance Armstrong</a> and his failed attempt at public confession is that we still have the form and symbolism of public religious ritual in this country, even when we’re not aware of it. It’s like we still have the exoskeleton of Christianity around us, but the creature that once lived inside it died long ago and has been eaten by ants.</p><p>A century after <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber">Max Weber</a> identified the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0140439218/?tag=saloncom08-20">“Protestant ethic”</a> at our nation’s moral spine, America has become a smorgasbord of cultures and faiths, where organized religion is fading fast (although spiritual belief is still widespread). But our public life and our popular culture remain profoundly entangled with Christian ideas about redemption and salvation, however half-baked and bastardized they have become. Nowhere is this more obvious than in our national obsession with confession and forgiveness, which extends from reality TV to the 12-step meeting in the church basement down the street. Sit alone in a bar long enough, and somebody will start telling you about how he screwed up his marriage and that time in Florida with that girl and all that coke.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/20/why_do_we_care_if_lance_apologizes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/20/why_do_we_care_if_lance_apologizes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>94</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Salon limerick contest</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/20/salon_limerick_contest_17/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/20/salon_limerick_contest_17/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 14:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salon Limerick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lance Armstrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oprah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers and Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poetry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13176726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Salon readers write the news in doggerel]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this week's contest, the NRA, quantum physics, and Lance Armstrong.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><em>The NRA is claiming huge membership increases as well as spike in the sale of assault rifles.</em></p><p>Did we have an assault weapons binge?</p><p>Just the thought should make all of us cringe.</p><p>Can we trust NRA,</p><p>to be honest when they,</p><p>Are the voice of a lunatic fringe?</p><p>Stephen Whitred<br /> Barriere, B.C., Canada</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Teachers with guns? – No thank you.</p><p>It’s an idea we need to eschew.</p><p>For let’s not forget,</p><p>There’d be a new threat;</p><p>Teachers can go psycho too.</p><p>Mark Tendas<br /> Los Angeles<br /> Quarterbacks come and quarterbacks go.</p><p>It ain't rocket science- it's just a big show.</p><p>So why shed a tear,</p><p>For the life and career,</p><p>Of the prayerful Timothy Tebow?</p><p>David Lloyd Maron<br /> New York City</p><div><a href="http://www.nature.com/news/experts-still-split-about-what-quantum-theory-means-1.12198" target="_blank">Experts still split on what quantum theory means</a></div><div><strong>Experiencing quantum reality</strong></div><div>Nick's achieved the impossible feat --</div><div>Weaned himself from the classical teat.</div><div>Now he knows where it's at,</div><div>With Schrödinger's Cat,</div><div>But needs help in crossing the street.</div><div data-tooltip="Hide expanded content"><img src="https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/images/cleardot.gif" alt="" /></div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/20/salon_limerick_contest_17/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/20/salon_limerick_contest_17/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;SNL&#8221; recap: Dry as a winter&#8217;s bone</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/20/snl_recap_dry_as_a_winters_bone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/20/snl_recap_dry_as_a_winters_bone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 13:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SNL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saturday Night Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Lawrence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kate mckinnon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taran killam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Piers Morgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lance Armstrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manti Te'o]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jodie foster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hobbit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13176907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oscar nominee Jennifer Lawrence hosts the first "SNL" of 2013 — arguably one of the worst episodes of the season]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"SNL" returned last night after taking a monthlong break, which seemed to have no restorative effect whatsoever on the show's writers.  With the exception of a few chuckles (and I know that commenters will say that this is true of every episode. I've tuned in since the eighties, believe me I know. But I still hold out hope), this was a big yawn of an episode. Part of the problem is that the writers didn't quite know what to do with Golden Globe-winner, J.Law, who proved in such sketches as "Danielle: A Free European Woman" and "Richard and the Buffalo" that she is game to let her freak flag fly. Mostly, they saddled the best-leading actress Oscar nominee with pouty, dour supporting roles. And, predictably, they made her trot out old Katniss Everdeen.</p><p>Here is the Hunger Games champ at this<strong> post-Hunger Games press conference</strong>. One reporter wants to know: Did she take performance-enhancing drugs? What no one wants to know: Anything about the only other winner, Peeta. Poor chump.</p><p><iframe id="nbc-video-widget" src="http://www.nbc.com/assets/video/widget/widget.html?vid=1429002" frameborder="0" width="560" height="315"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/20/snl_recap_dry_as_a_winters_bone/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/20/snl_recap_dry_as_a_winters_bone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>J.J. Abrams&#8217; Bad Robot to produce Lance Armstrong biopic</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/18/lance_armstrong_biopi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/18/lance_armstrong_biopi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lance Armstrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biopic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jj abrams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tour de France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance enhancing drugs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13175801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The production company has purchased the screen rights to "Cycle of Lies: The Fall of Lance Armstrong"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hot on the heels of the disgraced cyclist's confession, Paramount Pictures and Bad Robot, the production company co-owned by legendary director J.J. Abrams and producer Bryan Burk, have acquired the screen rights to the story about the fall of American hero Lance Armstrong, <a href="http://www.deadline.com/2013/01/lance-armstrong-movie-jj-abrams-paramount-deal/">reports Deadline</a>.</p><p>Unlike Bad Robots' typically sci-fi cache, the Armstrong pic probably <a href="https://twitter.com/_ChristopherM/status/292352371747606528">won't include aliens or time travel</a>. Instead, the movie will be based on the proposal for "Cycle of Lies: The Fall of Lance Armstrong," a HarperCollins book to be written by New York Times sports reporter <a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/topics/reference/timestopics/people/m/juliet_macur/index.html">Juliet Macur</a>, who has covered Armstrong's career throughout his tragic downfall.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/18/lance_armstrong_biopi/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/18/lance_armstrong_biopi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Armstrong and Te&#8217;o&#039;s apologies could use some performance enhancement</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/18/armstrong_and_teos_apologies_could_use_some_performance_enhancement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/18/armstrong_and_teos_apologies_could_use_some_performance_enhancement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lance Armstrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oprah Winfrey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manti Te'o]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blood Doping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tour de France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notre Dame]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13175584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two athletes admit their wrongs, but still can't bring themselves to say "I'm sorry"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week, two very different athletes came under intense, worldwide scrutiny for their elaborate deceptions. And in light of a deluge of unassailable evidence, Lance Armstrong and Manti Te’o faced different media firestorms and had to hold themselves accountable. Your mom said it best: Are they sorry they did it, or are they just sorry they got caught? But neither Armstrong nor Te'o seems sorry at all.</p><p>At first glance, Armstrong and Te'o would appear to have little in common beyond professional athleticism and a penchant for elaborate ruses. In an interview with our national confessor in chief Oprah Winfrey, the 41-year-old Armstrong acknowledged that he'd been doping up a storm throughout his professional cycling career, including his seven winning Tour de France races. Meanwhile, after <a href="http://deadspin.com/5976517/manti-teos-dead-girlfriend-the-most-heartbreaking-and-inspirational-story-of-the-college-football-season-is-a-hoax">a sensational exposé in Deadspin</a>, Notre Dame linebacker Te'o admitted that his girlfriend Lennay Kekua, who'd tragically died of leukemia in September, had never existed at all. And it's in the way that both men have handled their deceptions that another commonality has emerged – neither one will ever win a prize for World's Greatest Apologizer.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/18/armstrong_and_teos_apologies_could_use_some_performance_enhancement/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/18/armstrong_and_teos_apologies_could_use_some_performance_enhancement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lance Armstrong&#8217;s unmoving confession</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/18/lance_armstrongs_unmoving_confession/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/18/lance_armstrongs_unmoving_confession/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lance Armstrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oprah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oprah Winfrey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OWN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance enhancing drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bicycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tour de France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cheating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Livestrong]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13175471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The cyclist admits to doping in a controlled interview with Oprah — and offers the lamest of apologies]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lance Armstrong appeared with Oprah last night, the first part of a two-part confession special, to publicly admit to taking the performance enhancing drugs he has not just denied using, but vehemently, ruthlessly denied using, denigrating and bullying and seeking to destroy the far less powerful people who have told nothing but the truth about his habits. Armstrong picked Oprah to conduct this interview — as opposed to some sports journalist, or Barbara Walters, or Brian Williams or any of the other possible choices — because she alone confers on public screw-ups the sense that just by speaking to her they are beginning the long road back to acceptability. Oprah is a journalist, as she ably demonstrated last night, but she also occupies a particular space, that of celebrity confessor in chief, our national moral proxy, the woman empowered to find her subjects wanting or sufficiently remorseful, the person who accepts tears but not excuses, holds her subjects to the facts and, more important, the feelings. Unfortunately for Lance Armstrong, he does not appear to have enough of those.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/18/lance_armstrongs_unmoving_confession/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/18/lance_armstrongs_unmoving_confession/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lance Armstrong comes clean</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/18/lance_armstrong_comes_clean/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/18/lance_armstrong_comes_clean/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 13:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lance Armstrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oprah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance enhancing drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tour de France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cycling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13175415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The cyclist admitted to doping during competition for the first time ever during an interview with Oprah]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lance Armstrong, who last year lost the titles to his seven Tour de France wins over charges related to taking performance enhancing drugs, finally came clean to Oprah in a no-holds-barred interview after years of denial. Watch some of the highlights from the first part of the interview, below:</p><p>Armstrong reveals the range of banned substances for 13 years. He says was not possible to win the Tour de France seven times without the drugs:</p><p><iframe width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" src="http://www.oprah.com/common/omplayer_embed.html?article_id=41507"></iframe></p><p>When Oprah asks, "Why now admit it?" Armstrong responds, "I don't know that I have a great answer," adding, "this is too late." He explains that having "the perfect story" compelled him to maintain the lie:</p><p><iframe width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" src="http://www.oprah.com/common/omplayer_embed.html?article_id=41518"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/18/lance_armstrong_comes_clean/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/18/lance_armstrong_comes_clean/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why do we keep getting suckered by stories like Manti Te&#8217;o?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/17/lance_armstrong_and_manti_teo_too_feel_good_to_be_true/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/17/lance_armstrong_and_manti_teo_too_feel_good_to_be_true/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 19:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lance Armstrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manti Te'o]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notre Dame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oprah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lying]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13174375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Updated: On the heels of the Notre Dame scandal, guidelines for journalists reporting on inspirational stories]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When lawyers try cases, they have to deal with burdens of persuasion and standards of proof.  For example, when the prosecution attempts to convict someone of a crime, it has the burden of persuasion -- before hearing any evidence the jury is supposed to presume the defendant is innocent -- and the jury is not supposed to convict the defendant unless the prosecution demonstrates the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.</p><p>I would like to propose the following rule for journalists: When presented with a feel-good story on a sports-related subject, you should presume the story is fabricated, unless persuaded by clear and convincing evidence to the contrary.</p><p>This is just one of the many lessons to be extracted from the increasingly bizarre story of Manti Te’o, the star football player whose heart-rending narrative about the simultaneous death of his grandmother and his girlfriend turned out to have been invented out of whole cyber-cloth.</p><p>(Another lesson is that administrators at Notre Dame are far more likely to weep over the imaginary death of a nonexistent girl than they are to shed tears for a <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/17/notre_dames_double_standard/">real girl who actually committed suicide</a>, after allegedly being sexually assaulted by one of Teo’s teammates.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/17/lance_armstrong_and_manti_teo_too_feel_good_to_be_true/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/17/lance_armstrong_and_manti_teo_too_feel_good_to_be_true/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Must-see morning clip</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/must_see_morning_clip_90/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/must_see_morning_clip_90/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 14:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must see morning clip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lance Armstrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daily show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Livestrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13172838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jon Stewart is furious with Lance Armstrong for lying about doping]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"What entity is more powerful than lady justice?" asks Jon Stewart, about the omnipotent force that got cyclist Lance Armstrong to confess about taking performance enhancement drugs. "Oprah," he reveals. Stewart then expressed mock outrage over the confession, saying, "Armstong was doping, it seems so obvious in hindsight," likening the realization to finding out the tooth fairy isn't real for the first time:</p><div style="background-color: #000000; width: 410px;"> <div style="padding: 4px;"> <p><iframe src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/embed/mgid:cms:video:thedailyshow.com:422879" frameborder="0" width="400" height="228"></iframe></p> <p style="text-align: left; background-color: #ffffff; padding: 4px; margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 0px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/tue-january-15-2013/mr--fibb">The Daily Show with Jon Stewart</a></strong><br /> Get More: <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/">Daily Show Full Episodes</a>,<a href="http://www.indecisionforever.com/">Political Humor &amp; Satire Blog</a>,<a href="http://www.facebook.com/thedailyshow">The Daily Show on Facebook</a></p> </div> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/must_see_morning_clip_90/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/must_see_morning_clip_90/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oprah on Armstrong: &#8220;He did not come clean in the manner I had expected&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/15/oprah_on_armstrong_he_did_not_come_clean_in_the_manner_i_had_expected/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/15/oprah_on_armstrong_he_did_not_come_clean_in_the_manner_i_had_expected/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 15:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lance Armstrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance enhancing drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oprah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13171514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many remain angry and skeptical even after the disgraced cyclist comes clean]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cyclist Lance Armstrong, who in October 2012 was stripped of his 7 Tour de France titles after the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency charged him for taking performance enhancing drugs, has continued to deny doping--until yesterday. Armstrong opened up about the issue for the first time ever, <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2013/01/15/169399481/reports-lance-armstrong-admits-doping">admitting to Oprah</a> in a 2.5 hour interview that he did, in fact, use performance enhancing drugs while competing.</p><p>Descriptions of the interview itself give the impression that Armstrong surrendered during an intense, emotional session with Oprah, who said on "CBS This Morning" that Armstrong "did not come clean in the manner I had expected":</p><p>[embedtweet id="291169313019289600"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="291178520288305152"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="291177477747916801"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="291171351719473153"]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/15/oprah_on_armstrong_he_did_not_come_clean_in_the_manner_i_had_expected/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/15/oprah_on_armstrong_he_did_not_come_clean_in_the_manner_i_had_expected/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AP source: Armstrong tells Oprah Winfrey he doped</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/15/ap_source_armstrong_tells_oprah_winfrey_he_doped/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/15/ap_source_armstrong_tells_oprah_winfrey_he_doped/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 03:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lance Armstrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oprah Winfrey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cycling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://http://www.salon.com/2013/01/15/ap_source_armstrong_tells_oprah_winfrey_he_doped/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For years the cyclist had denied using performance enhancing drugs]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — Lance Armstrong ended a decade of denial by confessing to Oprah Winfrey that he used performance-enhancing drugs to win the Tour de France, a person familiar with the situation told The Associated Press.</p><p>The admission Monday came hours after an emotional apology by Armstrong to the Livestrong charity that he founded and turned into a global institution on the strength of his celebrity as a cancer survivor.</p><p>The person spoke on condition of anonymity because the interview is to be broadcast Thursday on Winfrey's network. She tweeted afterward, "Just wrapped with (at)lancearmstrong More than 2 1/2 hours. He came READY!" She was scheduled to appear on "CBS This Morning" on Tuesday to discuss the interview.</p><p>The confession was a stunning reversal for Armstrong after years of public statements, interviews and court battles in which he denied doping and zealously protected his reputation.</p><p>Even before the taping session with Winfrey began around 2 p.m., EST, Armstrong's apology suggested he would carry through on promises over the weekend to answer her questions "directly, honestly and candidly."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/15/ap_source_armstrong_tells_oprah_winfrey_he_doped/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/15/ap_source_armstrong_tells_oprah_winfrey_he_doped/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lance Armstrong says &#8220;sorry&#8221; to Livestrong staff</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/lance_armstrong_sorry_to_livestrong_staff/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/lance_armstrong_sorry_to_livestrong_staff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 21:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lance Armstrong doping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lance Armstrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oprah Winfrey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steroids]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13171050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a source, Armstrong apologized to the cancer foundation's staff before heading to his Oprah interview]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — Lance Armstrong apologized to the staff at his Livestrong cancer foundation before heading to an interview with Oprah Winfrey, a person with direct knowledge of the meeting told The Associated Press.</p><p>The person spoke on condition of anonymity because the discussion was private.</p><p>Stripped last year of his seven Tour de France titles because of doping charges, Armstrong addressed the staff Monday and said, "I'm sorry." The person said the disgraced cyclist choked up and several employees cried during the session.</p><p>The person also said Armstrong apologized for letting the staff down and putting Livestrong at risk but he did not make a direct confession to the group about using banned drugs. He said he would try to restore the foundation's reputation, and urged the group to continue fighting for the charity's mission of helping cancer patients and their families.</p><p>After the meeting, Armstrong, his legal team and close advisers gathered at a downtown Austin hotel for the interview.</p><p>The cyclist will make a limited confession to Winfrey about his role as the head of a long-running scheme to dominate the Tour with the aid of performance-enhancing drugs, a person with knowledge of the situation has told the AP.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/lance_armstrong_sorry_to_livestrong_staff/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/lance_armstrong_sorry_to_livestrong_staff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AP: Lance Armstrong confesses to Oprah</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/12/ap_lance_armstrong_confesses_to_oprah/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/12/ap_lance_armstrong_confesses_to_oprah/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 18:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lance Armstrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oprah Winfrey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13169242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Informed sources say the once-celebrated cyclist admits to some doping charges in an interview with Winfrey]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lance Armstrong will make a limited confession to doping during his televised interview with Oprah Winfrey next week, according to a person with knowledge of the situation.</p><p>Armstrong, who has long denied doping, will also offer an apology during the interview scheduled to be taped Monday at his home in Austin, according to the person who spoke on condition of anonymity because there was no authorization to speak publicly on the matter.</p><p>While not directly saying he would confess or apologize, Armstrong sent a text message to The Associated Press early Saturday that said: "I told her (Winfrey) to go wherever she wants and I'll answer the questions directly, honestly and candidly. That's all I can say."</p><p>The 41-year-old Armstrong, who vehemently denied doping for years, has not spoken publicly about the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency report last year that cast him as the leader of a sophisticated and brazen doping program on his U.S. Postal Service teams that included use of steroids, blood boosters and illegal blood transfusions.</p><p>The USADA report led to Armstrong being stripped of his seven Tour de France titles and given a lifetime ban from the sport.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/12/ap_lance_armstrong_confesses_to_oprah/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/12/ap_lance_armstrong_confesses_to_oprah/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Armstrong come clean?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/09/armstrong_comes_clean_for_oprah/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/09/armstrong_comes_clean_for_oprah/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 16:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lance Armstrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Livestrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oprah Winfrey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tour de France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Frey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13165922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The disgraced cyclist plans to sit down with Oprah — and hints that he may reveal more about the doping allegations]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, this is going to be good. Lance Armstrong, America's favorite cyclist/cancer survivor/alleged epic doper has revealed he is going to speak the most openly – and at length – he has since being stripped of his seven Tour de France wins and banned from competition last August. If you're watching, you might want to stock up on Gatorade because this is an endurance event – his first interview is going to be 90-minute sit-down with (arm flourish) <em>Opraaaaaaaah Winfreeeeeeeeeey</em>.</p><p>On her site, Winfrey and company promise the interview, airing next week, will be <a href="http://www.oprah.com/pressroom/Lance-Armstrong-on-Oprahs-Next-Chapter">"no-holds-barred"</a> — and that "Armstrong will address the alleged doping scandal, years of accusations of cheating, and charges of lying about the use of performance-enhancing drugs throughout his storied cycling career." Last week, the New York Times laid the groundwork for what he might reveal, with the news that <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/05/sports/cycling/lance-armstrong-said-to-weigh-admission-of-doping.html?_r=0">"he is considering publicly admitting that he used banned performance-enhancing drugs and blood transfusions during his cycling career."</a> The Times says rumor has it Armstrong is mulling an admission in the hopes of an eventual reinstatement for competition – a career move that the 41-year-old realistically doesn't have a whole lot of time left to make.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/09/armstrong_comes_clean_for_oprah/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/09/armstrong_comes_clean_for_oprah/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lance Armstrong to confess to Oprah?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/09/lance_armstrong_to_confess_to_oprah/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/09/lance_armstrong_to_confess_to_oprah/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 02:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lance Armstrong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oprah Winfrey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13165588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Winfrey announces an exclusive interview with the controversial cyclist next week. He will address doping scandal]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lance Armstrong may be about to come clean -- to Oprah Winfrey.</p><p>The controversial cyclist will give his first interview since he was stripped of his seven Tour de France titles to Winfrey, she <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/08/lance-armstrong-oprah-interview_n_2435616.html">announced </a>today, and it will air Thursday, Jan. 17 on her cable network, OWN.</p><p>The announcement of the audience with Oprah comes just days after the New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/05/sports/cycling/lance-armstrong-said-to-weigh-admission-of-doping.html?_r=0" target="_blank">reported</a> that Armstrong has been talking with advisers and friends about possibly admitting to doping.</p><p>Winfrey said that Armstrong will address "the alleged doping scandal and charges of lying about the use of performance-enhancing drugs throughout his cycling career."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/09/lance_armstrong_to_confess_to_oprah/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/09/lance_armstrong_to_confess_to_oprah/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
