<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > legislation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/legislation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:22:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>GOP quits public policy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/gop_quits_public_policy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/gop_quits_public_policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 18:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13279870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Evidence reveals that today's conservatives have been historically bad at writing bills or developing an agenda]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are Republicans even trying? There's good evidence to suggest they are not.</p><p>While I’ve been saying that <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/06/the_republican_party_is_officially_broken/">the GOP is broken</a> and hopelessly dysfunctional, Rachel Maddow has come up with a new name for part of that dysfunction: Republicans are “<a href="http://maddowblog.msnbc.com/_news/2013/03/29/17517191-why-mike-kelly-got-distracted?lite">post-policy</a>.” To some extent, that’s because they’ll simply oppose whatever Barack Obama proposes, but there’s also an even more interesting aspect of it that they simply have given up on and lost the capacity for developing policy ideas.</p><p>And, no, it’s not just because they are conservatives and conservatives are inherently less likely to have policy ideas. A look at the evidence will demonstrate this.</p><p>Here’s the story: Over the last couple of decades, majority parties in the House of Representatives have taken to reserving the very first bill numbers for their party’s agenda. Normally, bills are just numbered in order, when they are introduced: H.R. 637 is usually the bill introduced just after H.R. 636 and just before H.R. 638. But that’s just custom, and at some point a new custom evolved to save H.R. 1 through H.R. 5, and then through H.R. 10, for important party agenda bills.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/gop_quits_public_policy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/gop_quits_public_policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>India toughens sex crime laws, but problems remain</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/04/india_toughens_sex_crime_laws_but_problems_remain/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/04/india_toughens_sex_crime_laws_but_problems_remain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 21:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delhi gang rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence Against Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual assault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13190646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Critics say that the changes are cosmetic, and will do little to reduce violence and discrimination against women]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>India introduced a new package of laws against sexual assault and human trafficking on Sunday, marking one of the most significant actions the government has taken to combat violence and sexual abuse against women. Prompted by the brutal gang rape and murder of a young woman on a moving bus in Delhi, the new measure was signed into law on Sunday by President Pranab Mukherjee.</p><p>The law make crimes such as voyeurism, stalking, acid attacks and the trafficking of women punishable under criminal law. But many women's groups have rejected the measure, arguing that it only selectively accepted the recommendations of the Justice JK Verma commission. The commission, named after its chair and former Supreme Court judge JS Verma, sought to make marital rape a criminal offense, and for members of India's <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/police_often_part_of_the_problem_for_rape_victims_in_india/" target="_blank">police and armed forces</a> to be tried in criminal courts for for sex crimes, rather than being prosecuted in army courts.</p><p>The new laws reject both recommendations.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/04/india_toughens_sex_crime_laws_but_problems_remain/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/04/india_toughens_sex_crime_laws_but_problems_remain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
