<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Leon Panetta</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/leon_panetta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:22:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Gov&#8217;t downsizes amid GOP demands for more cuts</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/22/govt_downsizes_amid_gop_demands_for_more_cuts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/22/govt_downsizes_amid_gop_demands_for_more_cuts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 15:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leon Panetta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/2013/02/22/govt_downsizes_amid_gop_demands_for_more_cuts/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spending on core governmental functions has been shrinking steadily since the recession]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — Republicans and other fiscal conservatives keep insisting on more federal austerity and a smaller government. Without much fanfare or acknowledgement, they've already gotten much of both.</p><p>Spending by federal, state and local governments on payrolls, equipment, buildings, teachers, emergency workers, defense programs and other core governmental functions has been shrinking steadily since the deep 2007-2009 recession and as the anemic recovery continues.</p><p>This recent shrinkage has largely been obscured by an increase in spending on benefit payments to individuals under "entitlement" programs, including Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and veterans benefits. Retiring baby boomers are driving much of this increase.</p><p>Another round of huge cuts — known in Washington parlance as the "sequester" — will hit beginning March 1, potentially meaning layoffs for hundreds of thousands of federal workers unless Congress and President Barack Obama can strike a deficit-reduction deal to avert them.</p><p>With the deadline only a week off, Obama and Republicans who control the House are far apart over how to resolve the deadlock. While last-minute budget deals are frequent in Washington, neither side is optimistic of reaching one this time.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/22/govt_downsizes_amid_gop_demands_for_more_cuts/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/22/govt_downsizes_amid_gop_demands_for_more_cuts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conflicting reports on Afghanistan troop withdrawal</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/22/conflicting_reports_on_afghanistan_troop_withdrawal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/22/conflicting_reports_on_afghanistan_troop_withdrawal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 15:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leon Panetta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[troop withdrawal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13208571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[German official says up to 10,000 U.S. troops will remain through 2014, when Obama had said all troops would leave]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BRUSSELS -- Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and his NATO counterparts are considering leaving 8,000 to 12,000 troops in Afghanistan after 2014, but a dispute arose Friday between the U.S. and German defense officials over whether that contingent would be an international force or an American one.</p><p>The conflicting accounts came as NATO defense ministers gathered here to discuss the endgame of the 11-year-old war in Afghanistan. President Barack Obama has said that the last combat troops will leave Afghanistan on Dec. 31, 2014, leaving the bulk of the country's security in the hands of the Afghans.</p><p>German Defense Minister Thomas de Maiziere told reporters Panetta had informed him at the Brussels meeting that the United States would leave between 8,000 and 10,000 troops in the war-torn country at the end of 2014.</p><p>But Panetta, speaking to reporters later, called de Maiziere's comments inaccurate.</p><p>Panetta, who will leave Obama's Cabinet when his successor is confirmed, told reporters that he and the NATO partners instead talked about ranges of options for the post-2014 troop force. And he said the figures reflected contributions that other nations would make, in addition to the United States.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/22/conflicting_reports_on_afghanistan_troop_withdrawal/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/22/conflicting_reports_on_afghanistan_troop_withdrawal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pentagon notifies Congress of likely furloughs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/20/pentagon_notifies_congress_of_likely_furloughs_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/20/pentagon_notifies_congress_of_likely_furloughs_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Secretary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leon Panetta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13206836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Department of Defense says it may have to shorten the workweek for 800,000 workers if the sequester kicks in]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — Defense Secretary Leon Panetta told Congress on Wednesday that if automatic government spending cuts kick in on March 1 he may have to shorten the workweek for the "vast majority" of the Defense Department's 800,000 civilian workers.</p><p>They would lose one day of work per week, or 20 percent of their pay, for up to 22 weeks, probably starting in late April.</p><p>To dispel the notion that this is mainly a problem for the nation's capital, the Pentagon's budget chief, Robert Hale, told reporters that the economic impact would be felt nationwide. The biggest potential losses, in term of total civilian payroll dollars, would be in Virginia, California, Maryland, Texas and Georgia, according to figures provided by the Pentagon.</p><p>Hale said the unpaid leaves for civilian workers would begin in late April and would save $4 billion to $5 billion if extended through the end of the budget year, Sept. 30. That is only a fraction of the $46 billion the Pentagon would have to cut this budget year unless a deficit-reduction deal is reached.</p><p>Panetta also said the across-the-board spending reductions would "put us on a path toward a hollow force," meaning a military incapable of fulfilling all of its missions.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/20/pentagon_notifies_congress_of_likely_furloughs_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/20/pentagon_notifies_congress_of_likely_furloughs_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drone pilots to receive medals</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/15/drone_pilots_to_receive_medals_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/15/drone_pilots_to_receive_medals_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 18:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leon Panetta]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13202765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. military will begin honoring the controllers behind the controversial targeted killing programs]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" /></a></p><p>Outgoing Defense Secretary Leon Panetta <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-11386_3-57569265-76/cyber-drone-operators-now-eligible-for-distinguished-warfare-medal/">announced this week</a> a new medal for desk-bound warriors who control killer robots responsible for the deaths of thousands in South Asia, North Africa and the Middle East.</p><p>The Distinguished Warfare Medal will recognize drone pilots for their “extraordinary achievements that directly impact on combat operations, but do not involve acts of valor or physical risks that combat entails.”</p><p>In other words, what Glenn Greenwald  <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/07/10/bravery_and_drone_pilots/" target="_blank">once described</a> as “sitting safely ensconced in a bunker on U.S. soil and launching bombs with a video joystick at human beings thousands of miles away” is now considered an “extraordinary achievement.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/15/drone_pilots_to_receive_medals_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/15/drone_pilots_to_receive_medals_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Women of the armed services put a face to military sexual trauma</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/women_of_the_armed_services_put_a_face_to_military_sexual_trauma/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/women_of_the_armed_services_put_a_face_to_military_sexual_trauma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 18:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women in combat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Armed Forces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leon Panetta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual assault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military sexual trauma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13199960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new viral campaign "I Am One" gets personal in the fight against rape and sexual assault in the military ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to military <a href="http://servicewomen.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/RSASH-Quick-Facts_April-2012-FINAL.pdf" target="_blank">statistics</a>, there were 3,191 reports of sexual trauma in 2011. But experts, <a href="http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/01/18/10184222-panetta-could-be-19000-military-sex-assaults-each-year?lite" target="_blank">including Defense Secretary Leon Panetta</a>, believe that because these assaults are grossly underreported, there were actually as many as 19,000 - 22,000 sex crimes in the military that year.</p><p>The women (and some men) who were raped or sexually assaulted by fellow service members are often faced with field commanders, as well as a Pentagon and Department of Veterans Affairs, who refuse to recognize their claims, provide treatment or prosecute the offenders.</p><p>But now survivors of sexual assault in the military are speaking out, putting a human face to a silent epidemic.</p><p>In addition to an Oscar nod for “The Invisible War,” a documentary on the pervasive culture of sexual abuse in the military, a viral campaign "<a href="http://onein19000.tumblr.com/" target="_blank">I Am One</a>" is documenting the personal experiences of women survivors.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/women_of_the_armed_services_put_a_face_to_military_sexual_trauma/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/women_of_the_armed_services_put_a_face_to_military_sexual_trauma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leon Panetta: We wanted to arm the Syrian resistance</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/08/pentagon_wanted_to_arm_the_syrian_resistance_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/08/pentagon_wanted_to_arm_the_syrian_resistance_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 19:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GlobalPost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leon Panetta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13195292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The defense secretary told Congress on Thursday that this was the plan before Obama nixed it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U.S. defense chiefs told Congress Thursday they backed the possibility of arming Syrian rebels.<br /> <a href="http://www.globalpost.com/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_globalPostInline.gif" alt="Global Post" /></a></p><p>Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and General Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told lawmakers they recommended arming Syria's rebels.</p><p>President Obama ultimately decided against the move, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/07/us-usa-syria-pentagon-idUSBRE91613A20130207">said Reuters</a>, instead providing non-lethal aid to rebels.</p><p>It is believed that anti-government rebels are being armed by Saudi Arabia and Qatar.</p><p>At a hearing in Congress Thursday, Republican Sen. John McCain asked Pentagon leaders: "How many more have to die before you recommend military action?"</p><p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/9856382/Leon-Panetta-supports-Hillary-Clinton-plan-to-arm-Syrian-rebels.html">The Telegraph reported</a> that McCain pressed the leaders on the issue asking: "Did you support the recommendation by then-Secretary of State Clinton and then-head of CIA General Petraeus that we supply weapons to the resistance in Syria?"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/08/pentagon_wanted_to_arm_the_syrian_resistance_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/08/pentagon_wanted_to_arm_the_syrian_resistance_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pentagon extends limited benefits to gay couples</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/06/pentagon_extends_limited_benefits_to_gay_couples/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/06/pentagon_extends_limited_benefits_to_gay_couples/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 14:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DoMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense of Marriage Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leon Panetta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military spouses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBTQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13192210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But while DOMA remains the law of the land, full health and housing benefits remain off limits to same-sex partners]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Outgoing Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta is preparing to announce yet another landmark change in military policy, senior officials say. Only weeks after lifting the ban on women in combat, the Pentagon is set to <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/06/us/politics/pentagon-to-extend-certain-benefits-to-same-sex-partners.html?ref=todayspaper" target="_blank">extend certain benefits</a> to the spouses of gay military personnel.</p><p>But the full medical, dental and housing allowances gay military couples have been fighting for will likely remain out of reach, at least for now.</p><p>Members of the military are federal employees, and extending equal benefits to gay personell would first require the repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), the 1996 law that defines marriage as a union between one man and one woman. That means that even gay couples who have legally recognized marriages in other states still fall under federal jurisdiction at the Pentagon -- and under the rules and restrictions of DOMA.</p><p>While the two-tiered system of benefits for gay and lesbian service members remains largely intact, experts believe the Pentagon's latest move toward fairness could help do away with DOMA, eventually:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/06/pentagon_extends_limited_benefits_to_gay_couples/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/06/pentagon_extends_limited_benefits_to_gay_couples/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AP sources: Pentagon extending benefits for gays</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/05/ap_sources_pentagon_extending_benefits_for_gays_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/05/ap_sources_pentagon_extending_benefits_for_gays_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 22:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don't Ask Don't Tell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leon Panetta]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13191777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Pentagon is likely to allow same-sex partners to have access to some health and welfare programs]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — The military is poised to extend some benefits to the same-sex partners of service members, U.S. officials said Tuesday, about 16 months after the Pentagon repealed its ban on openly gay service.</p><p>Defense Secretary Leon Panetta has not made a final decision on which benefits will be included, the officials said, but the Pentagon is likely to allow same-sex partners to have access to the on-base commissary and other military subsidized stores, as well as some health and welfare programs.</p><p>Panetta must walk a fine, legal line. While there has been increased pressure on the Pentagon to extend some benefits to same-sex partners, defense officials must be careful not to violate the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, or DOMA. The federal law forbids the federal government from recognizing any marriage other than those between a man and a woman.</p><p>An announcement is expected to come in the next several days. Officials discussed the plan on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to publicly discuss internal Pentagon deliberations.</p><p>Pentagon press secretary George Little declined to comment. Other officials made it clear that there are still last-minute legal discussions going on to determine the details.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/05/ap_sources_pentagon_extending_benefits_for_gays_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/05/ap_sources_pentagon_extending_benefits_for_gays_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Women in combat: The best worst reactions</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/women_in_combat_the_best_worst_reactions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/women_in_combat_the_best_worst_reactions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women in combat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leon Panetta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navy Seals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13180543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, the Pentagon announced it would lift a ban on women in combat. Today, conservatives lost their minds]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's been less than 24 hours since the Pentagon announced they would <a href="http://bigstory.ap.org/article/panetta-opens-combat-roles-women" target="_blank">remove the longstanding military ban on women</a> in combat, and our friends on the Right wasted no time in going off the rails crazy about it. Apparently, lifting the ban on women in combat is the worst thing that's ever happened to the military. (At least since the <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/dont_ask_dont_tell/" target="_blank">last worst thing</a> that's ever happened to the military.)</p><p>A round up featuring the very best of the very worst.</p><p><strong>Heather Mac Donald of the National Review</strong></p><p>The Pentagon must think we are done fighting "real wars." Why else would they <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/338613/wrong-women-warriors-heather-mac-donald#" target="_blank">let women play army</a>?</p><blockquote><p>We have apparently arrived at the Golden Age, free from strife and the threat of foreign enemies. Little else can explain so gratuitous a decision as to place women in combat units.</p></blockquote><p>And there will be so much military sex happening! (As we know, things are uncomfortable enough with the <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/dont_ask_dont_tell/" target="_blank">gays hanging around</a>.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/women_in_combat_the_best_worst_reactions/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/women_in_combat_the_best_worst_reactions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>95</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Military lifts combat ban on women</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/military_lifts_ban_on_women_in_combat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/military_lifts_ban_on_women_in_combat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 21:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leon Panetta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13179968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Outgoing Defense Secretary Leon Panetta ushers in a new era of a "fully inclusive" military]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Outgoing Defense Secretary Leon Panetta has officially <a href="http://bigstory.ap.org/article/panetta-opens-combat-roles-women" target="_blank">removed the longstanding military ban on women</a> in combat.</p><p>Along with the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, Panetta is expected to formally announce the change on Thursday, Pentagon officials said. The military has been debating whether to let women fight on the front lines for years, though many women already serve in these positions, including piloting warplanes and serving on ships in combat areas. Almost 290,000 women have served in Afghanistan and Iraq since the beginning of both wars.</p><p>Panetta quietly opened 14,500 combat positions to women last year, and had vowed to lift the remaining exclusions from a 1994 ban on women in combat before his tenure with the Pentagon ended.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/military_lifts_ban_on_women_in_combat/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/military_lifts_ban_on_women_in_combat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Panetta defends Obama&#8217;s gun control package</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/17/panetta_defends_obamas_gun_control_package/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/17/panetta_defends_obamas_gun_control_package/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leon Panetta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Secretary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://http://www.salon.com/2013/01/17/panetta_defends_obamas_gun_control_package/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Who the hell needs armor-piercing bullets except you guys in battle?" The Defense Secretary said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VICENZA, Italy (AP) — Defense Secretary Leon Panetta fired off a strong defense of gun control legislation Thursday, in front of a decidedly skeptical audience.</p><p>Speaking to about 150 members of the 173rd Airborne Brigade Combat Team, Panetta said steps can be taken to protect kids in school without undermining the Second Amendment.</p><p>"Who the hell needs armor-piercing bullets except you guys in battle?" Panetta told the soldiers at the U.S. Army Garrison Vicenza in northern Italy. "For the life of me, I don't know why the hell people have to have assault weapons."</p><p>Panetta, who said he believes in the Second Amendment and has been a longtime duck hunter, was asked about the issue by a soldier who wanted to know what steps the Obama administration was going to take to deal with attacks in schools that "don't have to do with tearing apart our Second Amendment."</p><p>Known for his often blunt and colorful language, Panetta added that things can be done to protect children "so that the nuts that are out there won't use these kinds of weapons to wipe them out."</p><p>President Barack Obama's sweeping gun control package includes calls for a ban on assault weapons and a universal requirement for background checks on gun purchases.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/17/panetta_defends_obamas_gun_control_package/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/17/panetta_defends_obamas_gun_control_package/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama to nominate Chuck Hagel as defense secretary</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/06/obama_to_nominate_chuck_hagel_as_defense_secretary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/06/obama_to_nominate_chuck_hagel_as_defense_secretary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 15:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leon Panetta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Secretary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13163033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The announcement is expected to come tomorrow]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After vetting began five weeks ago, Politico reports that Barack Obama has picked former Republican senator and Vietnam vet Chuck Hagel to succeed current Defense Secretary Leon Panetta at the Pentagon. A Democratic aide defended the nomination, telling <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/01/chuck-hagel-picked-for-defense-secretary-85800.html?hp=t1">Politico</a>:</p><blockquote><p>“Chuck Hagel is a decorated war hero who would be the first enlisted soldier and Vietnam veteran to go on to serve as Secretary of Defense. He had the courage to break with his party during the Iraq War, and would help bring the war in Afghanistan to an end while building the military we need for the future.</p> <p>“He has been a champion for troops, veterans and military families through his service at the VA and USO, and his leadership on behalf of the post-9/11 G.I. Bill. The President knows him well, has traveled with him to Iraq and Afghanistan, trusts him, and believes he represents the proud tradition of a strong, bipartisan foreign policy in the United States.”</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/06/obama_to_nominate_chuck_hagel_as_defense_secretary/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/06/obama_to_nominate_chuck_hagel_as_defense_secretary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hagel opposed &#8220;openly aggressively gay&#8221; nominee</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/hagel_opposed_openly_aggressively_gay_nominee/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/hagel_opposed_openly_aggressively_gay_nominee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 05:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leon Panetta]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13151751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 1998, the potential defense secretary suggested an ambassador could be unfit to serve because of his sexuality]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chuck Hagel's path to the Pentagon may have hit a speedbump.</p><p>The former Nebraska senator, widely considered a finalist to succeed Leon Panetta as secretary of defense, opposed James Hormel's nomination as U.S. ambassador to Luxembourg in the late 1990s because Hormel was "openly, aggressively gay."</p><p><a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/zekejmiller/chuck-hagel-once-opposed-nominee-because-he-was-o">Buzzfeed </a>and the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/21/us/chuck-hagel-is-criticized-over-gay-rights-record.html?_r=0">New York Times</a> reported Thursday evening that in 1998, when Hormel's nomination was before the Senate, Hagel told a Nebraska newspaper that he had concerns about Hormel representing his country because of his sexuality.</p><p>“Ambassadorial posts are sensitive," Hagel told the Omaha World-Herald. "They are representing America," he said. "They are representing our lifestyle, our values, our standards. And I think it is an inhibiting factor to be gay — openly aggressively gay like Mr. Hormel — to do an effective job."</p><p>Conservatives in the Senate blocked a vote on Hormel's nomination; then-President Bill Clinton used a recess appointment to place him in the post.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/hagel_opposed_openly_aggressively_gay_nominee/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/hagel_opposed_openly_aggressively_gay_nominee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pentagon to send missiles, troops to Turkey</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/pentagon_to_send_missiles_400_troops_to_turkey/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/pentagon_to_send_missiles_400_troops_to_turkey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 09:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leon Panetta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conflict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/pentagon_to_send_missiles_400_troops_to_turkey/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They'll be fending off Scuds with Patriot missiles. Sound familiar?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>INCIRLIK AIR BASE, Turkey (AP) — The Pentagon says it will send Patriot air defense missiles and 400 troops to Turkey as part of a NATO force meant to protect Turkish territory from potential Syrian missile attack.</p><p>Pentagon press secretary George Little said Defense Secretary Leon Panetta signed a deployment order Friday en route to Turkey from Afghanistan.</p><p>The order calls for 400 US soldiers to operate two batteries of Patriots at undisclosed locations in Turkey, Little told reporters flying with Panetta.</p><p>Turkey is a founding member of NATO and requested that the alliance provide Patriots. They will be sent by NATO members Germany and the Netherlands as well as the U.S. for an undetermined period.</p><p><script type='text/javascript' src='http://pshared.5min.com/Scripts/PlayerSeed.js?sid=1236&amp;width=420&amp;height=280&amp;shuffle=0&amp;playList=517590379'></script></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/pentagon_to_send_missiles_400_troops_to_turkey/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/pentagon_to_send_missiles_400_troops_to_turkey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Has Syria crossed the chemical weapon &#8220;red line&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/has_syria_crossed_the_chemical_weapon_red_line/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/has_syria_crossed_the_chemical_weapon_red_line/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 19:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemical weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nerve gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leon Panetta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bashar al-Assad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Syrian Army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red line]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13117228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reports of Assad's nerve gas bombs have U.S. officials "concerned," but why the focus on chemical warfare?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U.S. officials reported that Syria's government is preparing nerve gas bombs and would use chemical weapons against its own people. According to an<a href="http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/12/05/15706380-syria-loads-chemical-weapons-into-bombs-military-awaits-assads-order?lite"> NBC report,</a> "The [Syrian] military has loaded the precursor chemicals for sarin, a deadly nerve gas, into aerial bombs that could be dropped onto the Syrian people from dozens of fighter-bombers, the officials said."</p><p>Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta <a href="http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/12/06/15727284-defense-chief-intel-raises-serious-concerns-about-syria-chemical-weapons?lite">followed up</a> the reports Thursday, noting "we are very concerned that as the opposition advances particularly on Damascus that the regime might very well consider the use of chemical weapons."</p><p>Chemical weapons have for the U.S. been an expressed "red line" in regards to Syria. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton stated previously that should Assad deploy chemical weapons against his people, "suffice to say we are certainly planning to take action.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/has_syria_crossed_the_chemical_weapon_red_line/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/has_syria_crossed_the_chemical_weapon_red_line/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pentagon begins planning for massive budget cuts</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/pentagon_begins_planning_for_massive_budget_cuts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/pentagon_begins_planning_for_massive_budget_cuts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 22:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leon Panetta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Showdown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/pentagon_begins_planning_for_massive_budget_cuts/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Defense Department is preparing for the $500 billion in cuts that will take place without a budget deal]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — The Defense Department has begun planning for the roughly $500 billion in personnel and program cuts over a decade that will be needed if Congress and the White House fail to reach a deal that would avoid the double hit of tax hikes and automatic spending reductions dubbed the "fiscal cliff."</p><p>Department spokesman George Little said the cuts would be "devastating to our national defense."</p><p>As the White House and members of Congress continue to wrangle over how best to find as much as $1.2 trillion in savings over the next 10 years to avert the fiscal cliff, Little said the Pentagon started more detailed discussions this week on how to slash 9.4 percent of its budget across the board.</p><p>He said cuts that deep could force the department to throw out its new military strategy, and cut weapons and technology programs, and it could hamper the department's ability to provide for its troops and their families.</p><p>He added that the department also is beginning to figure out how it will prepare and inform about 3 million military, civilian and contract workers about the cuts, if they occur.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/pentagon_begins_planning_for_massive_budget_cuts/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/pentagon_begins_planning_for_massive_budget_cuts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Panetta: Admin deciding on post-2014 troop levels</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/panetta_admin_deciding_on_post_2014_troop_levels/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/panetta_admin_deciding_on_post_2014_troop_levels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leon Panetta]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/panetta_admin_deciding_on_post_2014_troop_levels/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Defense Secretary says Obama is close to a decision on troop levels in Afghanistan]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ABOARD A U.S. MILITARY AIRCRAFT OVER THE PACIFIC (AP) — Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said Monday the Obama administration is nearing a decision in the next few weeks on how many U.S. troops would remain in Afghanistan — and for what purposes — after the U.S.-led combat mission ends in 2014.</p><p>Panetta told reporters aboard his plane en route from Hawaii to Australia that Gen. John Allen, the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan, has developed several options on a post-2014 presence.</p><p>Panetta also was asked about his future at the Pentagon. While he declined to reveal his plans, he suggested he still had work to do on the job he took in July 2011.</p><p>"It's no secret that at some point I'd like to get back to California," he said. Panetta is from Monterey, Calif.</p><p>He added that there are a number of important defense issues awaiting resolution, including a budget impasse and the future of U.S. involvement in Afghanistan — suggesting that he would not leave immediately.</p><p>"Right now, my goal is to basically meet my responsibilities with regard to dealing with those issues," Panetta said.</p><p>Pressed to say whether he would rule out staying for all four years of a second Obama term, he replied, "Who the hell knows?"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/panetta_admin_deciding_on_post_2014_troop_levels/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/panetta_admin_deciding_on_post_2014_troop_levels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China is biggest cyberthreat says congressional report</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/china_is_biggest_cyberthreat_says_congressional_report/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/china_is_biggest_cyberthreat_says_congressional_report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 19:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leon Panetta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyberattack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13066396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chinese hackers regularly disrupt U.S. intelligence and communications satellites and weapons targeting systems]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A U.S. Commission has called China "the most threatening actor in cyberspace" in a forthcoming report, a draft of which was obtained by <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-11-05/china-most-threatening-cyberspace-force-u-s-panel-says.html">Bloomberg News</a>. Bloomberg reported that a "U.S. intelligence official, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss classified matters, described as 'relentless' China’s efforts to blind or disrupt U.S. intelligence and communications satellites, weapons targeting systems, and navigation computers."</p><p>As Salon <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/12/panetta_warns_of_cyber_pearl_harbor/">reported</a>, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta foregrounded the report's sentiments in an October speech in which he warned of a possible "cyber Pear Harbor," in which cyber-attacks could dismantle major aspects of U.S. infrastructure. Panetta specifically named China as a concern -- one echoed in the commission's report, which does, however, stress that most Chinese intrusions against U.S. government and military systems appear intended to collect intelligence or technology rather than launch attacks. Bloomberg reprinted passages of the report draft, illustrating that the commission sees China's ability to manage sophisticated computer systems as limited but growing, bolstered by a doggedness:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/china_is_biggest_cyberthreat_says_congressional_report/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/china_is_biggest_cyberthreat_says_congressional_report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will the next 9/11 happen online?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/will_the_next_911_happen_online/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/will_the_next_911_happen_online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 13:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leon Panetta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber-attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secretary of Defense]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13048258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The secretary of defense claims cyber war is imminent. Its real threat may be to our constitutional liberties]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First the financial system collapses and it's impossible to access one’s money. Then the power and water systems stop functioning.  Within days, society has begun to break down.  In the cities, mothers and fathers roam the streets, foraging for food. The country finds itself fractured and fragmented -- hardly recognizable.</p><p>It may sound like a scene from a zombie apocalypse movie or the first episode of NBC’s popular new show “Revolution,” but it could be your life -- a nationwide cyber-version of Ground Zero.<br /> <a name="more"></a><br /> Think of it as 9/11/2015.  It’s Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta's vision of the future -- and if he’s right (or maybe even if he isn’t), you better wonder what the future holds for erstwhile American civil liberties, privacy, and constitutional protections.</p><p>Last week, Panetta <a href="http://www.lawfareblog.com/2012/10/secdef-panetta-speech-on-cybersecurity/" target="_blank">addressed</a> the Business Executives for National Security, an organization devoted to creating a robust public-private partnership in matters of national security. Standing inside the <em>Intrepid</em>, New York’s retired aircraft-carrier-cum-military-museum, he offered a hair-raising warning about an imminent and devastating cyber strike at the sinews of American life and wellbeing.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/will_the_next_911_happen_online/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/will_the_next_911_happen_online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Panetta warns of &#8220;cyber-Pearl Harbor&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/12/panetta_warns_of_cyber_pearl_harbor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/12/panetta_warns_of_cyber_pearl_harbor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Secretary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber-defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber-attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leon Panetta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber-security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13038416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. could be vulnerable to hackers dismantling major infrastructure]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. could possibly face a "cyber-Pearl Harbor," according to Defense Secretary Leon Panetta. Speaking at the Intrepid Sea, Air and Space Museum in New York on Thursday, Panetta warned that the country was vulnerable to serious cyber-attacks, which could dismantle major aspects of U.S. infrastructure.</p><p>Panetta said (via <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/12/world/panetta-warns-of-dire-threat-of-cyberattack.html?_r=1&amp;pagewanted=2">The New York Times</a>):</p><blockquote><p>An aggressor nation or extremist group could use these kinds of cyber tools to gain control of critical switches. They could derail passenger trains, or even more dangerous, derail passenger trains loaded with lethal chemicals. They could contaminate the water supply in major cities, or shut down the power grid across large parts of the country.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/12/panetta_warns_of_cyber_pearl_harbor/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/12/panetta_warns_of_cyber_pearl_harbor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
