<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > LGBT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/lgbt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 22:50:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Chris Christie isn&#8217;t &#8220;post-partisan&#8221; on LGBT rights</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/chris_christies_anti_lgbt_crusade/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/chris_christies_anti_lgbt_crusade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 17:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Buono]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13349658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The N.J. governor may be trying to craft a "post-partisan" national image. But on marriage, he's in a bitter fight]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie may be lauded in the national press as being more concerned with results than politics, but right now he's locked in a highly divisive, partisan battle in his home state. While Christie has cultivated the image of being “post-partisan” through strategic embraces of President Obama, he draws the line on conservative social values, like opposition to abortion and gay marriage. And right now he's locked in a bitter debate in New Jersey on the latter issue, and it could have national implications.</p><p>Christie, of course, governs a state that, polls indicate, supports establishing same-sex marriage and protecting a woman’s reproductive rights. So how does he walk the fine line, governing effectively in a state whose constituents have progressive social values, without disqualifying himself from the 2016 Republican primaries in which conservative Tea Party activists are the gatekeepers to the nomination?</p><p>In 2003, New Jersey was one of the first states to pass “domestic partnerships,” but the state’s Supreme Court struck them down. In 2006, the New Jersey Legislature voted to permit “civil unions.” In 2009, Democratic Gov. Jon Corzine committed to sign a marriage equality bill if the Democratic Legislature sent one to his desk. They weren’t able to make it happen in the few remaining months of Corzine’s term.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/chris_christies_anti_lgbt_crusade/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/chris_christies_anti_lgbt_crusade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BET apologizes to blogger for asking him to tone down feminine look</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/bet_apologizes_to_blogger_for_asking_him_to_tone_down_feminine_look/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/bet_apologizes_to_blogger_for_asking_him_to_tone_down_feminine_look/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 13:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13349538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[B. Scott was reportedly asked to remove his makeup and heels during the network's pre-awards show]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BET has issued a formal apology to openly gay fashion blogger B. Scott for asking him to adjust his feminine appearance when interviewing celebrities at the BET pre-awards show, reports <a href="http://bigstory.ap.org/article/bet-apologies-fashion-blogger-over-attire-clash">the AP</a>.</p><p>On <a href="http://lovebscott.com/news/open-letter-what-really-happened-to-me-at-the-bet-awards/">his blog</a>, Scott wrote that "I was literally yanked backstage and told that my look from head to toe 'wasn’t acceptable'":</p><blockquote><p>It’s not just about the fact that BET forced me to pull my hair back, asked me to take off my makeup, made me changed my clothes and prevented me from wearing a heel. It’s more so that from the mentality and environment created by BET made me feel less than and that something was wrong with who I am as a person.</p></blockquote><p>In a statement released to the AP, BET has apologized:</p><blockquote><p>"BET Networks embraces global diversity in all its forms and seeks to maintain an inclusive workforce and a culture that values all perspectives and backgrounds," the statement read. "The incident with B. Scott was a singular one with a series of unfortunate miscommunications from both parties. We regret any unintentional offense to B. Scott and anyone within the LGBT community and we seek to continue embracing all gender expressions."</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/bet_apologizes_to_blogger_for_asking_him_to_tone_down_feminine_look/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/bet_apologizes_to_blogger_for_asking_him_to_tone_down_feminine_look/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gay marriage? Ca-ching!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/29/gay_marriage_ca_ching/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/29/gay_marriage_ca_ching/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2013 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-sex marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBTQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13340125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The wedding industry is beginning to court same-sex dollars -- with caution]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The very same day that the Supreme Court handed down rulings in favor of marriage equality, popular wedding site The Knot premiered its <a href="http://wedding.theknot.com/real-weddings/same-sex-weddings.aspx">digital magazine</a> for LGBT brides- and grooms-to-be. It was a powerful reminder: There's a lot of money to be made on gay marriage. Same-sex weddings will bring California businesses $492 million in the next three years, according to one <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/money/la-fi-mo-weddings-economy-20130626,0,1659205.story">recent estimate</a>. In 2004, Forbes <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2004/04/05/cx_al_0405gaymarriage.html">predicted</a> that if legalized in all states, same-sex weddings could generate $16.8 billion from LGBT couples who decided to get hitched. It’s already an estimated $55 to $70 billion industry. Major brands have begun to take note.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/29/gay_marriage_ca_ching/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/29/gay_marriage_ca_ching/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lady Gaga returns to public eye to celebrate gay pride</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/29/lady_gaga_returns_to_public_eye_with_speech_for_lgbt_rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/29/lady_gaga_returns_to_public_eye_with_speech_for_lgbt_rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2013 14:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lady Gaga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DoMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCOTUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13346163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The singer spoke at a gay pride rally in New York on Friday night]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stepping into the public eye for the first time in months after her hip surgery, on Friday night pop star Lady Gaga delivered a speech at New York's Gay Pride kick-off rally. Gaga, a longtime LGBT icon and activist, paid tribute to the LGBT community celebrating the Supreme Court's <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/supreme_court_strikes_down_doma/">historic ruling</a> in favor of marriage equality earlier this week.</p><p>"As my LGBT fans and friends always said to me, 'I knew Laday Gaga when,'" Gaga said. "Well, look who the star is now. Now I get to say that I knew you when. Now I get to say that I knew you when you suffered, when you felt unequal, when you felt there was nothing to look forward to."</p><p>Waving a rainbow flag, Gaga then sand the national anthem:</p><p><iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/Kdd6JzJgJGY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/29/lady_gaga_returns_to_public_eye_with_speech_for_lgbt_rights/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/29/lady_gaga_returns_to_public_eye_with_speech_for_lgbt_rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breaking: Not all gays are alike!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/breaking_not_all_gays_are_alike/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/breaking_not_all_gays_are_alike/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 14:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DoMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense of Marriage Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prop *]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13339807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[USA Today uncovers the shocking news that not all gay people will get married]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every now and then, a news headline is so bottomlessly dumb -- and <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/27/kendall-jenner-photo-shoot_n_3509483.html?utm_hp_ref=mostpopular">not even from HuffPo</a> -- it makes us wonder if there's an editorial directive out there to State the Obvious. In the aftermath of <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/best_of_the_worst_right_wing_responses_to_the_court/">a historic week</a> for LGBT rights, we bring you this recent gem: A USA Today story that reveals <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/06/27/same-sex-marriage-research/2465023/">"Not all gays and lesbians want to marry, research shows."</a> You don't say!</p><p>USA Today isn't exactly a bastion of profound insight – it's best known as the newspaper you find outside your hotel room door in the morning. But it still deserves a very special shout-out for condescending, heterosplaining crap anyway. In the story, Sharon Jayson says that "Just because same-sex couples can legally marry doesn't mean they will" and that "marriage isn't for everyone." Whoa whoa whoa SLOW DOWN, USA Today. The Supreme Court didn't just make marriage mandatory for every homosexual in America? Jayson goes on to quote a University of Minnesota researcher who observes, "Some gays and lesbians clearly want to get married, but others are unsure or reject marriage for themselves." I feel a <a href="http://www.themoreyouknow.com/">"The more you know"</a> rainbow coming on here.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/breaking_not_all_gays_are_alike/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/breaking_not_all_gays_are_alike/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Modern Family&#8221; considers gay marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/modern_family_considers_gay_marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/modern_family_considers_gay_marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 13:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modern Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DoMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13338716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now that DOMA has been struck down, Cam and Mitch might get married]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court's ruling against the Defense of Marriage Act on Wednesday might influence the storyline for "Modern Family," according to show co-creator Christopher Lloyd. </p><p>While the ACLU previously pushed for a marriage between the show's gay couple, Cam (Eric Stonestreet) and Mitchell’s (Jesse Tyler Ferguson), who together have adopted a girl named Lily, the show didn't want to cave into "political pressure," Lloyd told <a href="http://insidetv.ew.com/2013/06/26/doma-reaction-modern-family-considering-gay-marriage/">EW</a>.</p><p>Now, however, “It’s certainly something we are contemplating on the show in ways we wouldn’t have in prior seasons," said Lloyd.</p><p>Lloyd told EW, “As you can imagine in Cam [Eric Stonestreet] and Mitchell’s [Jesse Tyler Ferguson] life, they would be feeling that a door has opened that was closed to them. Wouldn’t it be pretty tempting to think about walking through it? We imagine a lot of gay couples today are deciding whether to get married now that it’s open to them. From our standpoint, that’s something to explore.”</p><p>“It’s a funny thing, sitting around and celebrating for your characters on a day like this,” said Lloyd. “We were happy for Mitch and Cam today!”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/modern_family_considers_gay_marriage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/modern_family_considers_gay_marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Kennedy beat Scalia</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/how_kennedy_beat_scalia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/how_kennedy_beat_scalia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antonin Scalia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense of Marriage Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DoMA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13338348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[His opinion was a mess -- but the liberal justices weren't about to point that out and risk losing his vote]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading the Supreme Court’s opinions in the same-sex marriage cases felt like watching a couple of crazy old uncles bicker. I’m a law professor, and I’ve been reading Supreme Court opinions for years. Justice Anthony Kennedy, who wrote the majority opinion striking down the Defense of Marriage Act, was his typical self: bloviating, self-important, irritating even when he’s right about everything just because he’s so damn pleased with himself. Antonin Scalia, who dissented, also did not disappoint: a snarling, grumpy old man, full of viciously funny one-liners.</p><p>Don’t misunderstand me: This was a great day. Same-sex marriage came to California, and DOMA, a stupid, nasty law, is history. The Court acted well. But the judges’ opinions leaven the heroic tale with some comic relief.</p><p>DOMA declares, in pertinent part, that the word "marriage," wherever it appears in the U.S. Code, "means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife." The rule applies indiscriminately across all federal laws, producing some weird results. Federal ethics rules bar officials from participating in matters in which their spouses have a financial interest — but not if they're same-sex spouses. It is a federal crime to assault, kidnap or kill a member of the immediate family of a federal official in order to influence or retaliate against that official — but not if you do that to a same-sex spouse. Ditto Social Security, federal pensions, taxation of inheritances (which was the issue in today's case), and over a thousand other provisions.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/how_kennedy_beat_scalia/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/how_kennedy_beat_scalia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>75</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to be a straight ally in post-DOMA America</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/how_to_be_a_straight_ally_in_post_doma_america/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/how_to_be_a_straight_ally_in_post_doma_america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBTQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage equality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13338045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to SCOTUS, actress Kristen Bell has ended her equality-minded marriage protest. Do such protests matter?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Wednesday morning, actress Kristen Bell <a href="http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/kristen-bell-proposes-to-dax-shepard-after-doma-overturned-2013266">proposed</a> to Dax Shepard, the father of her 3-month-old daughter, via tweet. She wrote to him, "will you marry me? Xo #marriageequality #loveislove." You see, as the "Veronica Mars" star told Larry King last year, "The reason we're not rushing to get married is because I don't feel appropriate taking advantage of a right that's denied to my [gay and lesbian] friends.”</p><p>But then the Supreme Court ruled the Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutional and dismissed a Proposition 8 appeal, clearing the way for same-sex marriage in California.</p><p>Bell is far from the first straight person to boycott the institution in the name of marriage equality. Back in 2003, the Village Voice ran <a href="http://www.villagevoice.com/2003-12-09/news/standing-on-ceremony/2/">a piece</a> about the trend of doing just that among progressive heterosexual couples. <a href="http://www.nationalmarriageboycott.com">The National Marriage Boycott</a> has gotten more than 15,000 signatures from gays and straights alike who have pledged to wait to marry until "full federal marriage equality" is achieved. Shortly after Bell's announcement, a straight couple that had "always said we wouldn't marry while our queer friends couldn't" <a href="http://ask.metafilter.com/243623/Should-we-get-straightmarried-in-California-this-week">took to MetaFilter</a> to ask whether they should marry now, given the SCOTUS news.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/how_to_be_a_straight_ally_in_post_doma_america/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/how_to_be_a_straight_ally_in_post_doma_america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;I&#8217;m So Excited!&#8221;: An air disaster, made fabulous</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/im_so_excited_an_air_disaster_made_fabulous/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/im_so_excited_an_air_disaster_made_fabulous/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 19:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks: Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pedro Almodovar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[penelope cruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I'm So Excited!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13338023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Celebrate gay pride with Pedro Almodóvar -- and an outrageous sex, drugs and death party on board a doomed plane]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There’s close to zero explicit political content in Pedro Almodóvar’s <a href="http://www.sonyclassics.com/imsoexcited/" target="_blank">“I’m So Excited!”</a>, but in its own way the veteran Spanish filmmaker’s latest work is the perfect way to celebrate a landmark week for the cause of freedom and equality. A romantic and erotic fantasy largely set among the passengers and crew of a possibly doomed airplane (the Spanish title is simply “Los amantes pasajeros”), “I’m So Excited!” deliberately recalls the exuberant and outrageous cinema that first put Almodóvar, and the hedonistic cultural scene of post-Franco Spain, on the global map in the early ‘80s.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/im_so_excited_an_air_disaster_made_fabulous/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/im_so_excited_an_air_disaster_made_fabulous/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UPDATED: Salon&#8217;s marriage equality &#8220;courage-meter&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/updated_salons_marriage_equality_courage_meter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/updated_salons_marriage_equality_courage_meter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 18:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lgbt right]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage equality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13337941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Which public officials have shown guts -- or expediency -- in the fight for equality. Now includes Justice Kennedy!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Supreme Court arguments were heard in March on Proposition 8 and the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), political leaders exhibiting varying degrees of courage lined up to announce their support of marriage equality. Some just came <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/03/jon-tester-gay-marriage-89347.html">off of reelection</a>, meaning they wouldn't face voters for six years. One was a Republican prompted to change his position <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/03/will-portman-rob-portman-gay-marriage-89276.html">by his gay son</a>. And still another was a former secretary of state abstaining from the political fray until recently, and suddenly finding herself following the party she <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/01/20/clinton.announcement/index.html?_s=PM:POLITICS">once sought to lead</a>.</p><p>In response -- with a tip of the hat to New York magazine's "approval matrix" -- we presented our gay marriage "courage-meter." On the x-axis is timing -- who was ahead of the curve, and who came to the party late. The y-axis represents who showed guts and risked political capital for their support.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/updated_salons_marriage_equality_courage_meter/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/updated_salons_marriage_equality_courage_meter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anthony Kennedy: &#8220;The first gay justice&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/anthony_kennedy_the_first_gay_justice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/anthony_kennedy_the_first_gay_justice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 17:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DoMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13337542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A look at the often inscrutable jurist who cast the key vote against DOMA -- and cemented a legacy of LGBT rights]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justice Anthony Kennedy has long relished his role as the swing vote on the Supreme Court -- and perhaps no more so than today, when, with his decision to make a 5-4 majority to strike down the Defense of Marriage Act, he single-handedy helped extend legal and economic benefits to millions of Americans, change the course of American history and crystallize his legacy in the pantheon of civil rights agents.</p><p>“If Bill Clinton was ‘the first black president,’ Anthony Kennedy has now firmly secured his place in history as ‘the first gay justice,'" said former Kennedy clerk Michael Dorf, who now teaches law at Cornell.</p><p>Kennedy has often confounded liberals and conservatives alike with his unpredictable decision-making. "On most cases of great moment, the intellectual battlefield of the Supreme Court has shrunk to the space between this one man's ears," Time magazine's Massimo Calabresi and David Von Drehle wrote in their <a href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2116699,00.html">2010 profile</a> of the justice.</p><p>But on gay rights, Kennedy is atypically consistent. "As the author of Romer v. Evans, Lawrence v. Texas and now United States v. Windsor, Justice Kennedy makes clear that he not only accepts, but welcomes the task of writing majestic opinions affirming the dignity of gay persons and couples," Dorf added.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/anthony_kennedy_the_first_gay_justice/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/anthony_kennedy_the_first_gay_justice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Late June has a deep pro-LGBT history</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/the_supreme_courts_auspicious_timing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/the_supreme_courts_auspicious_timing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stonewall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13337453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today's rulings coincide with other important dates in the fight for equality: Stonewall and Lawrence v. Texas ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With two landmark Supreme Court rulings, today's date will undoubtedly be added to the canonical dates of the struggle for LGBT equality, made all the more meaningful by its close proximity to the anniversary of the Stonewall riots, which gave birth to the gay rights movement in America almost exactly 44 years ago, and the Supreme Court's first major pro-equality decision 10 years ago today.</p><p>Shortly after midnight on June 28, 1969, police in New York <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stonewall_riots">raided</a> the Stonewall Inn in Greenwich Village, arresting and harassing the gay clientele. It was like countless previous police raids on gay clubs until a series of escalating events led to open rebellion in the Village, and sparked the beginning of the gay equality movement. A year later, June 28 marked the first Gay Pride protests in a handful of major cities. To this day, most Pride rallies, including those in other countries, are still held at the end of June in honor of Stonewall, and this weekend's festivities in San Francisco, New York and other cities promise to be all the more buoyant, given the Supreme Court's rulings.</p><p>Coincidentally, today also marks the 10-year anniversary of the day the Supreme Court handed down its landmark ruling in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_v._Texas">Lawrence v. Texas</a>, which struck down anti-sodomy laws. It was an early victory in a string of legal advances for LGBT equality, leading to today's.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/the_supreme_courts_auspicious_timing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/the_supreme_courts_auspicious_timing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Military recruiters set up shop at San Francisco Pride</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/military_recruiters_set_up_shop_at_san_francisco_gay_pride_parade/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/military_recruiters_set_up_shop_at_san_francisco_gay_pride_parade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 13:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don't Ask Don't Tell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gays in the military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bradley Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay pride]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13336213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This weekend will mark the first time the U.S. military has officially participated in the city's gay pride event]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the first time since the 2011 repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell, military recruiters will be stationed among the revelers (and copious <a href="http://sfpride.org/sponsors/sponsors.html" target="_blank">corporate sponsors</a>) at San Francisco's gay pride parade, <a href="https://www.google.com/search?q=military+to+recruit+at+gay+pride&amp;oq=military+to+recruit+at+gay+pride&amp;aqs=chrome.0.57j62.3437j0&amp;sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8#q=military+to+recruit+at+gay+pride&amp;source=lnms&amp;tbm=nws&amp;sa=X&amp;ei=uo7JUcXZK9Sz4AOjr4GoDw&amp;ved=0CA0Q_AUoAQ&amp;fp=c193dce588cc382f&amp;biw=1422&amp;bih=780&amp;bav=on.2,or.r_qf.&amp;cad=b&amp;sei=75nJUeXPF9S50QG8goHADA" target="_blank">according to organizers</a>.</p><p>The California National Guard will have two booths at this weekend's event, tabled by gay soldiers who have volunteered to answer questions about military life for out service members.</p><p>The military has loomed large over the city's 2013 pride, as organizers recently stripped Pfc. Bradley Manning of an honorary role as Grand Marshal following backlash among conservation and military-affiliated LGBT individuals and groups. The event board released a <a href="http://lgbtweekly.com/2013/04/26/sf-pridebradley-manning-will-not-be-a-grand-marshal/" target="_blank">statement</a> this spring rescinding Manning's honorary title, and reaffirmed their position earlier this month:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/military_recruiters_set_up_shop_at_san_francisco_gay_pride_parade/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/military_recruiters_set_up_shop_at_san_francisco_gay_pride_parade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The future of the &#8220;ex-gay&#8221; movement</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/the_future_of_the_ex_gay_movement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/the_future_of_the_ex_gay_movement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 17:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alan chambers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ex-gay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exodus international]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-sex marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13332964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Former Exodus International head Alan Chambers talked to Salon about shuttering the organization, and what's next]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan Chambers stunned evangelical Christians and gay rights advocates last week with the news that Exodus International, the "ex-gay" ministry that he led for the last 12 of its 37-year existence, would be <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/ex_gay_christian_group_shuts_down_following_bombshell_apology/" target="_blank">closing its doors</a> for good. In a statement released just before the announcement that Exodus was no more, Chambers apologized to LGBT people for "years of undue suffering and judgment at the hands of the organization,” and said that his next venture would focus on "hosting thoughtful and safe conversations about gender and sexuality, while partnering with others to reduce fear, inspire hope, and cultivate human flourishing."</p><p>The announcement came as a shock to some, but the end of Exodus had been a long time coming, as Chambers told Salon. "In my gut I knew that would actually come to fruition at some point during my leadership," he said of the decision. "We've modified as much as we can modify; this organization still holds a lot of negative connotations and a lot of bad memories for people, and we needed to just simply close the doors."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/the_future_of_the_ex_gay_movement/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/the_future_of_the_ex_gay_movement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eric Fanning becomes highest-ranking openly gay person in Defense Dept.</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/22/eric_fanning_becomes_highest_ranking_openly_gay_person_in_defense_dept/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/22/eric_fanning_becomes_highest_ranking_openly_gay_person_in_defense_dept/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jun 2013 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eric fanning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DADT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13334462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fanning became civilian head of the Air Force after former Air Force Secretary Michael Donley retired on Friday]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric Fanning, who became the civilian head of the Air Force after Air Force Secretary Michael Donley retired on Friday, is now the highest-ranking openly gay member in the Defense Department. Fanning was confirmed as undersecretary in April and will serve as Acting Secretary until a candidate has been nominated and confirmed by President Obama and the Senate.</p><p>In a recent interview with <a href="http://www.washingtonblade.com/2013/05/30/eric-fanning/">The Washington Blade</a>, the 44 year-old LGBT advocate spoke about his vision for an a more LGBT-friendly Air Force:</p><blockquote><p>“My view about government is you should always use those resources that are available to you first before you move up to the next level, so I think there are a number of things we can do inside this building for the Department of Defense,” Fanning said. “If the president wanted to do that for the government at large, that’s a different issue, but we have the ability within the Department of Defense to codify this without having the president issue an executive order.”</p> <p>Fanning also said he backs the idea of openly transgender service in the military. Currently, openly transgender people are unable to serve in the armed forces and face a medical discharge if their gender identity becomes known.</p> <p>“I think that the military is stronger, institutions are stronger, and society is stronger the more inclusive that we are,” Fanning said. “So, wherever we can root out discrimination, I think it’s a positive thing.”</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/22/eric_fanning_becomes_highest_ranking_openly_gay_person_in_defense_dept/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/22/eric_fanning_becomes_highest_ranking_openly_gay_person_in_defense_dept/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The gay rights movement&#8217;s key advantage</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/gay_rights_has_an_edge_over_reproductive_rights_movement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/gay_rights_has_an_edge_over_reproductive_rights_movement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 19:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antiabortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense of Marriage Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposition 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roe v. Wade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage equality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13333318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gay causes feature public, familiar faces because so many have come out. Abortion groups don't yet have that luxury]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the cascade of comparisons made recently between abortion and same-sex marriage -- and the specter of a political backlash arising from a Supreme Court ruling advancing gay marriage -- one glaring distinction between the two issues has been largely overlooked by prognosticators: the power of coming out.</p><p>Sixty percent of Americans now <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/06/06/cnn-poll-americans-attitudes-toward-gay-community-changing/">say they have a close friend or family member</a> who is gay, an 11 percent jump from 2010. In the 1990s, most Americans said exactly the opposite.</p><p>Essentially, a progressive societal shift has taken place — what was once considered taboo has now become polite dinner table conversation in a good number of American households. And while civil rights advancements almost always provoke some societal tension, this trend toward a humanization of the subject may largely insulate the LGBT equality movement from the setbacks that have sometimes befallen the reproductive rights movement.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/gay_rights_has_an_edge_over_reproductive_rights_movement/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/gay_rights_has_an_edge_over_reproductive_rights_movement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cindy McCain says husband John is &#8220;coming around&#8221; on gay marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/cindy_mccain_says_husband_john_is_coming_around_on_gay_marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/cindy_mccain_says_husband_john_is_coming_around_on_gay_marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 18:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cindy mccain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13332132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[McCain discusses her recent gay rights activism and if her husband's views are evolving in a new podcast]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cindy McCain talked about her recent turn as a gay rights advocate and her husband's (potentially) evolving views on equal marriage as a guest on the Bender podcast on Thursday.</p><p>McCain credits her daughter Megan with opening her eyes and "challenging" her to do more to support gay rights -- and that may not be the only case of familial influence going on in the McCain household.</p><p>When asked about her husband Sen. John McCain -- who is currently <a href="http://www.policymic.com/articles/24522/immigration-reform-2013-john-mccain-makes-bizarre-comparison-between-gay-couples-and-abortion" target="_blank">working</a> pretty hard to keep protections for LGBT individuals out of immigration reform -- McCain said a change of heart (and policy persuasion?) may be on the horizon: "I think he's coming around," she said. "My husband and I have differed on many issues over the years … I think down the line we'll see our country changing … on this issue I know he believes what's right."</p><p>You can listen to the full podcast <a href="http://benderlounge.com/episode-24-cindy-mccain/" target="_blank">here</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/cindy_mccain_says_husband_john_is_coming_around_on_gay_marriage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/cindy_mccain_says_husband_john_is_coming_around_on_gay_marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Archbishop: &#8220;May a lesbian marry a gay man? My answer is &#8216;yes&#8217;&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/archbishop_may_a_lesbian_marry_a_gay_man_my_answer_is_yes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/archbishop_may_a_lesbian_marry_a_gay_man_my_answer_is_yes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholic Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Archbishop Oscar Cruz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13330651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A cleric says gay people can totally marry -- as long as they marry someone of the opposite sex]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there's one thing the Catholic Church is good at, it's finding loopholes in its own convoluted dogma. These are the people who invented Limbo, after all. So leave it to an enterprising archbishop to find a workaround on marriage equality. If gay men and women want to get hitched, no problem, says Archbishop Oscar Cruz of the Philippines. "I ask this question to myself and I have thought about it for a long time and the answer is 'yes,'" he declared earlier this week at the Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines-National Appellate Matrimonial Tribunal. There's just one catch.</p><p>"May a lesbian marry a gay man?" he told the crowd. <a href=" http://gaynewsnetwork.com.au/news/world/11220-philippine-archbishop-says-it-s-okay-for-a-gay-man-and-a-lesbian-to-marry.html">"My answer is 'yes,' because in that instance the capacity to consummate the union is there.</a> The anatomy is there. The possibility of conception is there." Apparently in Cruz's mind, "consummation" is limited strictly to those activities which can result in conception, and conception is good enough to call it a marriage. Cruz went on to to discuss marriage equality, saying, "For the Church, even if you turn it upside down and call it by another name, it would still not be marriage. For the Church, even if a hundred [judges] bless a same-sex wedding, it would still not be effective." Who needs love or even a like-minded orientation to get the Church's blessing anyway, when you've got straight up anatomy?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/archbishop_may_a_lesbian_marry_a_gay_man_my_answer_is_yes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/archbishop_may_a_lesbian_marry_a_gay_man_my_answer_is_yes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ENDA lands support from another Democrat</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/enda_lands_support_from_another_democrat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/enda_lands_support_from_another_democrat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 20:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Carper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13328997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The legislation now has 51 co-sponsors, but not yet enough to break a likely Republican filibuster]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Tom Carper, D-Del., became the 51st co-sponsor of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, meaning that legislation to protect LGBT people in the workplace now has majority support in the Senate. Of course, to break a probable Republican filibuster, the bill still needs to reach the 60-vote mark.</p><p>"Senator Carper believes it is important for federal law to explicitly prohibit workplace discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation -- in the same way that current law addresses race, sex or religion -- in order to ensure that all Americans are protected equally under the law," Ian Sams, a spokesman for Carper, told the <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/17/tom-carper-enda_n_3454733.html">Huffington Post</a>.</p><p>Last week, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid became the 50th co-sponsor -- including Republican Sens. Mark Kirk of Illinois and Susan Collins of Maine -- and has said the Senate will take up the legislation "soon." Only five Democrats -- Sens. Tim Johnson of South Dakota, Bill Nelson of Florida, Mark Pryor of Arkansas, Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia -- have not yet signed on as co-sponsors.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/enda_lands_support_from_another_democrat/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/enda_lands_support_from_another_democrat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is this the end of HIV-criminalization in the military?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/military_cant_criminalize_soldiers_for_having_hiv_anymore_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/military_cant_criminalize_soldiers_for_having_hiv_anymore_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Independent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Repeal HIV Discrimination Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13326583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Infected service members can be tried under a variety of charges. A new bipartisan amendment aims to change that]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.americanindependent.com"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/TheAmericanIndependent.jpg" alt="The American Independent" align="left" /></a></p><p>A bipartisan amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act would require the Department of Defense to conduct an internal review of policies and prosecutions related to military members living with HIV.</p><p>Currently the military can try service-members with HIV under a variety of charges, including failing to obey an order for having unprotected sex, not disclosing an HIV-positive status, or for aggravated assault, wherein HIV is the factor for the more serious charge.</p><p>The amendment would be the first time Congress has voted on HIV-criminalization matters since the passage of the 1990 Ryan White CARE Act, which required states to certify they had a process to prosecute deliberate transmission of HIV.</p><p>Reps. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) and Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.) are expected to introduce the <a href="http://lee.house.gov/sites/lee.house.gov/files/LeeHIVNDAA.pdf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">amendment</a> Thursday evening, Lee’s spokeswoman, Carrie Adams, said in a phone interview.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/military_cant_criminalize_soldiers_for_having_hiv_anymore_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/military_cant_criminalize_soldiers_for_having_hiv_anymore_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>