<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Libya</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/libya/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 01:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Benghazi email release fails to satisfy GOP</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/benghazi_email_release_fails_to_satisfy_gop_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/benghazi_email_release_fails_to_satisfy_gop_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 11:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Chaffetz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13300232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Congressional Republicans are demanding more information from the White House]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — The White House release of some 100 pages of emails and notes about the deadly attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, last year has failed to satisfy congressional Republicans, who are demanding more information.</p><p>"Why not release all of the unclassified documents?" said Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, a member of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. "The president has repeatedly said that when he gets new information, he'll release it to the public. Why not release — instead of the hand-picked ones — why not release all the unclassified documents?"</p><p>A spokesman for House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, said Wednesday Republicans hoped "this limited release of documents is a sign of more cooperation to come," while the chairman of the House Armed Services Committee pressed the Pentagon for more details about military orders around the time of the attack and what military aircraft were in the region.</p><p>Four Americans, including Ambassador Chris Stevens, were killed when militants struck the U.S. mission and CIA annex in twin nighttime attacks on Sept. 11, 2012.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/benghazi_email_release_fails_to_satisfy_gop_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/benghazi_email_release_fails_to_satisfy_gop_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White House releases trove of new Benghazi documents</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/white_house_releases_trove_of_new_benghazi_documents_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/white_house_releases_trove_of_new_benghazi_documents_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 21:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chris stevens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13299849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The documents include 100 pages of emails and notes detailing the administration's response to the attack]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — The White House is releasing 100 pages of e-mails and notes related to the Obama administration's response to the attack on a diplomatic facility in Benghazi, Libya, last September.</p><p>The White House had until now declined to make the documents public and had let congressional investigators review the documents without making copies.</p><p>The documents describe how the administration developed "talking points" to describe what the administration wanted to discuss publicly immediately after the Sept. 11, 2012, attack that killed U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/white_house_releases_trove_of_new_benghazi_documents_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/white_house_releases_trove_of_new_benghazi_documents_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll: Some voters outraged by Benghazi don&#8217;t know where Benghazi is</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/poll_some_voters_outraged_by_benghazi_dont_know_where_benghazi_is/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/poll_some_voters_outraged_by_benghazi_dont_know_where_benghazi_is/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 15:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Rice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13298053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new poll finds 39 percent who say Benghazi is "the biggest political scandal in American history" can't locate it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new poll from the Democratic-learning Public Policy Polling finds that among those who describe the Benghazi controversy as "the biggest political scandal in American history," 39 percent don't actually know where Benghazi is located.</p><p>From <a href="http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/PPP_Release_National_51313.pdf">PPP</a>:</p><blockquote><p>One interesting thing about the voters who think Benghazi is the biggest political scandal in American history is that 39% of them don't actually know where it is. 10% think it's in Egypt, 9% in Iran, 6% in Cuba, 5% in Syria, 4% in Iraq, and 1% each in North Korea and Liberia with 4% not willing to venture a guess.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/poll_some_voters_outraged_by_benghazi_dont_know_where_benghazi_is/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/poll_some_voters_outraged_by_benghazi_dont_know_where_benghazi_is/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP reprises &#8217;90s scandal playbook</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/gop_reprises_90s_scandal_playbook/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/gop_reprises_90s_scandal_playbook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 19:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1990s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Gates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Rice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Victoria Nuland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Petraeus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State DEpartment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13297366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With zero self-awareness, Beltway conservatives and journalists are salivating over a return to Clinton scandals]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First things first: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton never said “Who cares?” about how four Americans died in Benghazi. Sen. John McCain either misspoke or flat-out lied about that on ABC’s “This Week” on Sunday.</p><p>“Remember when she said, ‘well who cares how this happened,’ in a rather emotional way?” McCain asked guest host Martha Raddatz. “A lot of people care.” It’s too bad Raddatz didn’t tell the senator that no, she didn’t remember that – because Clinton never said it.</p><p>Remarkably, I’ve seen no one follow up on McCain’s misstatement today either. (I’m sure someone will correct me if I’m wrong.) Instead, reporters are breathlessly parsing each new GOP charge on Benghazi (while also decrying the very real abuse of the IRS overscrutinizing the tax-exempt status of conservative groups.)  The National Journal’s Ron Fournier tweeted “<a href="   https://twitter.com/ron_fournier/status/333976318981062656">Welcome to the 90s,”</a> with no apparent irony or self-awareness about the role of the media in ginning up that decade of phony scandals that paralyzed our last popular second-term Democratic president, Bill Clinton.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/gop_reprises_90s_scandal_playbook/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/gop_reprises_90s_scandal_playbook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>121</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama blasts Benghazi talking points</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/obama_dismisses_benghazi_talking_points/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/obama_dismisses_benghazi_talking_points/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 18:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13297362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a news conference Monday, the president dismissed GOP criticism of his administration's handling of the attack]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>WASHINGTON</strong> — President Barack Obama on Monday dismissed Republican criticism of his administration’s handling of the attack on a U.S. diplomatic post in Libya, calling the criticism a political sideshow.</p><p>Obama was asked at a news conference Monday about recent disclosures that talking points on the attack produced by the intelligence community were later watered down to delete references to suspected ties between last September’s assault and Islamic militants.</p><p>His comments came after Republican Congressman Darrell Issa, chairman of the House of Representatives Oversight and Government Reform Committee, sought answers from the leaders of an independent investigation that absolved Hillary Rodham Clinton of wrongdoing in the much-criticized response to the attacks in Benghazi that killed a U.S. ambassador and three other Americans.</p><p>Obama, who spoke at the news conference with visiting British Prime Minister David Cameron, said it was not clear in the aftermath of the attack who was responsible and what their motives were. He again defended his administration’s actions.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/obama_dismisses_benghazi_talking_points/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/obama_dismisses_benghazi_talking_points/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama: Focus on Benghazi talking points is a &#8220;sideshow&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/obama_focus_on_benghazi_talking_points_is_a_sideshow/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/obama_focus_on_benghazi_talking_points_is_a_sideshow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 16:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Rice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13297225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president said the notion that there was some kind of coverup "defies logic"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Obama strongly condemned renewed questions about the Benghazi talking points given to Susan Rice, following <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/benghazi_emails_reveal_turf_war_over_talking_points/">reports</a> that they had been revised 12 times with input from the State Department. "The whole issue of talking points, frankly throughout this process, has been a sideshow," Obama said in a press conference on Monday. "What we have been very clear about throughout was that immediately after this event happened, we were not clear who exactly had carried it out, how it had occurred, what the motivations were.</p><p>"So the whole thing defies logic and the fact that this keeps on getting churned out, frankly has a lot to do with political motivations," he continued. "We've had folks who have challenged Hillary Clinton's integrity, Susan Rice's integrity," also noting that Republicans have used the attacks on Benghazi for fundraising.</p><p>"We dishonor them when we turn things like this into a political circus," Obama said.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/obama_focus_on_benghazi_talking_points_is_a_sideshow/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/obama_focus_on_benghazi_talking_points_is_a_sideshow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Benghazi depositions to examine Clinton&#8217;s role</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/benghazi_depositions_to_examine_clintons_role_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/benghazi_depositions_to_examine_clintons_role_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 12:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darrell Issa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joint Chiefs of Staff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13296999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The House oversight panel hopes to clarify whether she directed the response to the nighttime attacks in Libya]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p id="yui_3_8_1_24_1368448361064_217">WASHINGTON (AP) — The Republican chairman of the House oversight panel is asking a veteran diplomat and a former chairman of the Joints Chief of Staff for sworn testimony about their investigation into the deaths of four Americans at a diplomatic outpost in Benghazi, Libya.</p><p id="yui_3_8_1_24_1368448361064_204">Rep. Darrell Issa, chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, planned on Monday to seek depositions from retired Ambassador Thomas Pickering and retired Adm. Mike Mullen. Issa, who is leading Republicans' investigations into the attacks on a State Department consulate last September, said he wants to know with whom the pair spoke to reach their conclusion that then-Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton did not direct the response to the pair of nighttime attacks in Libya.</p><p id="yui_3_8_1_24_1368448361064_215">"This is a failure, it needs to be investigated. Our committee can investigate. Now, Ambassador Pickering, his people and he refused to come before our committee," Issa said Sunday.</p><p>Pickering, sitting next to Issa during an appearance on one Sunday show, disputed the chairman's account and said that he was willing to testify before the committee.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/benghazi_depositions_to_examine_clintons_role_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/benghazi_depositions_to_examine_clintons_role_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The real reason not to intervene in Syria</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/the_real_reason_not_to_intervene_in_syria/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/the_real_reason_not_to_intervene_in_syria/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 17:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intervention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rwanda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anne-Marie Slaughter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State DEpartment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13288896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not only can outside interference in humanitarian emergencies not help -- it can actually make things worse]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Demands by politicians and pundits for intervention in Syria have become so strong that they now seem to be <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/01/world/middleeast/bomb-in-central-damascus.html?ref=middleeast">influencing U.S. policy</a>. But are they right? The most emotionally powerful arguments came from the State Department former policy planning head Anne-Marie Slaughter. The Obama administration is in danger of letting genocide akin to the one in Rwanda in the 1990s occur, she wrote, in the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/obama-should-remember-rwanda-as-he-weighs-action-in-syria/2013/04/26/08f77c20-ae8a-11e2-8bf6-e70cb6ae066e_story.html">Washington Post</a>. The case of Rwanda haunts Democrats. Former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright called not saving Rwandans her “greatest regret” from her time in office, “something that sits very heavy on all our souls.” U.N. ambassador Susan Rice has similarly expressed agony over U.S. failure to <a href="http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/11/29/rwandan_ghosts">intervene</a> in Rwanda.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/the_real_reason_not_to_intervene_in_syria/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/the_real_reason_not_to_intervene_in_syria/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The week in 10 pics</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/the_week_in_10_pics_10/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/the_week_in_10_pics_10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slideshow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The week in 10 pics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bangladesh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tripoli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ricin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13283426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Bangladesh to the banks of the Mississippi, a look at the images that defined the week]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[From Bangladesh to the banks of the Mississippi, a look at the images that defined the week]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/the_week_in_10_pics_10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sebastian Junger on Tim Hetherington: &#8220;He broadened the sense of what’s possible&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/sebastian_junger_on_tim_hetherington_he_broadened_the_sense_of_what%e2%80%99s_possible/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/sebastian_junger_on_tim_hetherington_he_broadened_the_sense_of_what%e2%80%99s_possible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 17:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sebastian junger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Hetherington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13273906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The journalist has made a film about the photographer killed in Libya. "I don't think it's made me more reluctant"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The photographer Tim Hetherington broke into the public consciousness with "Restrepo," a 2010 documentary that he co-directed with journalist Sebastian Junger depicting a platoon of American troops in Afghanistan. It was nearly universally hailed for an apolitical take on the struggle faced by soldiers in performing their arduous duties. Hetherington and Junger were nominated for the best documentary Oscar.</p><p>Now Junger has made a film without the co-directing aid of Hetherington; Junger's film, "Which Way Is the Front Line From Here," is a tribute to Hetherington, who died covering the Libyan civil war in 2011. The film, compiled of interviews and Hetherington's own footage, airs on HBO April 18.</p><p>Hetherington, who had been in Afghanistan on assignment for Vanity Fair, was not a war photographer in the traditional sense; as Junger's documentary conveys, he was far more interested in the fringes or consequences of war than in pictures of soldiers firing on their enemies, devoting his attention to children in Sri Lanka or to American soldiers sleeping after toilsome days.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/sebastian_junger_on_tim_hetherington_he_broadened_the_sense_of_what%e2%80%99s_possible/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/sebastian_junger_on_tim_hetherington_he_broadened_the_sense_of_what%e2%80%99s_possible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America&#8217;s imaginary homeland threats</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/americas_imaginary_homeland_threats_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/americas_imaginary_homeland_threats_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 12:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Marx]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13271000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[North Korea is the latest country to be slapped with the dubious enemy label, regardless of the danger it presents]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The communist enemy, with the “<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/31/world/asia/31korea.html" target="_blank">world’s fourth largest military</a>,” has been <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/north-korean-missile-launcher-moved-into-firing-position-as-g8-meet-to-discuss-crisis-8567998.html" target="_blank">trundling</a><strong> </strong>missiles around and threatening the United States with nuclear obliteration.  <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/27/world/asia/north-korea-calls-hawaii-and-us-mainland-targets.html" target="_blank">Guam, Hawaii</a>, <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/world/2013/03/07/north-korea-vows-nuclear-attack-on-us-ahead-un-sanctions-vote/" target="_blank">Washington</a>: all, it claims, are targetable.  The coverage in the media has been hair-raising.  The U.S. is <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/04/04/us-korea-north-idUSBRE93002620130404" target="_blank">rushing</a> an untested missile defense system to Guam, deploying missile-interceptor ships off the South Korean coast, <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/us-sends-nuclear-capable-b-2-bombers-skorea-112309292.html" target="_blank">sending</a> “nuclear capable” B-2 Stealth bombers thousands of miles on mock bombing runs, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/06/world/asia/us-sees-china-as-lever-to-press-north-korea.html" target="_blank">pressuring China</a>, and conducting large-scale <a href="http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2013/04/2013489110725477.html" target="_blank">war games</a> with its South Korean ally.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/americas_imaginary_homeland_threats_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/americas_imaginary_homeland_threats_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liz Cheney denounces political melodrama in melodramatic editorial</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/liz_cheney_denounces_political_melodrama_in_melodramatic_editorial/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/liz_cheney_denounces_political_melodrama_in_melodramatic_editorial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 18:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liz Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero Dark Thirty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13255839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cheney hates President Obama's sky-is-falling paranoia, but also wants you to know that the sky is falling ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is something that makes Liz Cheney really mad: the Obama White House and its brand of "sky-is-falling melodrama normally reserved for the lives of teenage girls."</p><p>Here is something else that makes the former vice president's eldest daughter really mad: that President Obama is "the most radical man ever to occupy the Oval Office" who has "launched a war on religious freedom" and has effectively told America's enemies that they can "attack us with impunity" and "suffer no consequences."</p><p>Want the short version? Obama is making THE SKY FALL.</p><p>Barring the possibility that Cheney's <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324105204578384692398126294.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEADTop" target="_blank">editorial in Friday's Wall Street Journal</a> is an exquisite piece of satire, it appears the former Bush State Department official lacks a certain self-awareness.</p><p>Let's consider Cheney's assessments of the Obama administration's record.</p><p>On foreign policy:</p><blockquote><p>The president has so effectively diminished American strength abroad that there is no longer a question of whether this was his intent.</p></blockquote><p>On Libya:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/liz_cheney_denounces_political_melodrama_in_melodramatic_editorial/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/liz_cheney_denounces_political_melodrama_in_melodramatic_editorial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drone efficiency is pure fantasy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/drone_warfare_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/drone_warfare_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 11:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apocalypse Now]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13250988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The deadly air strikes have proven neither cheap nor surgical -- nor especially triumphant]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today’s unmanned aerial vehicles, most famously Predator and Reaper drones, have been <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/02/world/awlaki-strike-shows-us-shift-to-drones-in-terror-fight.html" target="_blank">celebrated</a> as the culmination of the longtime dreams of airpower enthusiasts, offering the possibility of victory through quick, clean, and selective destruction.  Those drones, so the (very old) story goes, assure the U.S. military of command of the high ground, and so provide the royal road to a speedy and decisive triumph over helpless enemies below.</p><p>Fantasies about the certain success of air power in transforming, even ending, war as we know it arose with the plane itself.  But when it comes to killing people from the skies, <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/174887" target="_blank">again and again</a> air power has proven neither cheap nor surgical nor decisive nor in itself triumphant.  Seductive and tenacious as the dreams of air supremacy continue to be, much as they automatically attach themselves to the latest machine to take to the skies, air power has not fundamentally softened the brutal face of war, nor has it made war less dirty or chaotic.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/drone_warfare_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/drone_warfare_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What really goes on in the CIA&#8217;s &#8220;black-site&#8221; prisons?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/23/trial_of_alleged_al_qaeda_operative_raises_questions_about_cia_program_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/23/trial_of_alleged_al_qaeda_operative_raises_questions_about_cia_program_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ProPublica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[al qaeda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ibrahim suleiman adnan adam harun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13249425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The indictment of Ibrahim Suleiman Adnan Adam Harun could shed light on covert CIA counterterrorism measures ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Federal prosecutors in Brooklyn unsealed an <a href="http://www.propublica.org/documents/item/626007-harun-spin-ghul-indictment">indictment</a> Wednesday charging Ibrahim Suleiman Adnan Adam Harun with six terrorism-related counts.<br /> <a href="http://www.propublica.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/12/Logo-e1354323738840.jpg" alt="ProPublica" /></a></p><p>The announcement that Harun is in U.S. custody in New York may also shed light on a small part of one of the most secretive aspects of U.S. counterterrorism operations during the Bush administration: What became of terror suspects held by the CIA in its network of <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/01/AR2005110101644.html">“black-site” prisons</a> around the world? Or disappeared into <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2013/02/05/a-staggering-map-of-the-54-countries-that-reportedly-participated-in-the-cias-rendition-program/">foreign cells</a> in extraordinary renditions?<br /> With their indictment of Harun, prosecutors <a href="http://www.fbi.gov/newyork/press-releases/2013/alleged-al-qaeda-operative-charged-in-new-york-for-terrorism-offenses-against-americans-overseas">offered</a> a basic account of how the 43-year-old Nigerian – described as “a prototype al-Qaida Operative” – spent the last decade. He fought U.S. forces in Afghanistan, prosecutors said, before leaving for Africa, where he allegedly conspired to bomb U.S. diplomatic facilities. Harun, also known by his alias Spin Ghul, eventually wound up in Libyan prison for six years before he was released amid the turmoil of the uprising against Muammar Qaddafi.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/23/trial_of_alleged_al_qaeda_operative_raises_questions_about_cia_program_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/23/trial_of_alleged_al_qaeda_operative_raises_questions_about_cia_program_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hacker &#8220;Guccifer&#8221; distributes Hillary Clinton&#8217;s Libya memos</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/hacker_guccifer_distributes_hillary_clintons_libya_memos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/hacker_guccifer_distributes_hillary_clintons_libya_memos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guccifer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sidney blumenthal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13245481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The hacker obtained confidential emails from former WH aide Sidney Blumenthal's email account [UPDATED]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Update – March 19, 11:33 a.m.:</strong> This post is updated to reflect the fact that Sidney Blumenthal was formerly a Washington bureau chief for Salon.</p><p><strong>From earlier:</strong></p><p>Last week it was reported that a hacker going by "Guccifer" had gained access to the personal email account of former Clinton White House aide (and confidant to Hillary) Sidney Blumenthal. On Tuesday, <a href="http://www.thesmokinggun.com/buster/sidney-blumenthal/hacker-distributes-memos-784091">according to The Smoking Gun</a>, Guccifer began sharing contents found in Blumenthal AOL account (yes, Sidney Blumenthal still uses AOL mail).</p><p>In playful emails, the hacker disseminated four recent memos on Libya sent by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to a "wide array of congressional aides, political figures, and journalists worldwide." The Smoking Gun reported that, "most of the e-mail recipients were sent four separate memos that were e-mailed to Clinton by Blumenthal during the past five months. Each memo dealt with assorted developments in Libya, including the September 11, 2012 attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi. One memo marked “Confidential” was sent to Clinton on September 12."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/hacker_guccifer_distributes_hillary_clintons_libya_memos/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/hacker_guccifer_distributes_hillary_clintons_libya_memos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clinton to face Congress on Libya assault</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/clinton_to_face_congress_on_libya_assault/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/clinton_to_face_congress_on_libya_assault/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 13:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secretary of State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Stevens]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13179455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Secretary of State will answer questions about the attacks on the U.S. consulate in September]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton faces tough questions in her long-awaited congressional testimony concerning the assault on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans.</p><p>Clinton is the sole witness Wednesday at back-to-back hearings before the Senate and House foreign policy panels on the September raid, an independent panel's review that harshly criticized the State Department and the steps the Obama administration is taking to beef up security at U.S. facilities worldwide.</p><p>Clinton had been scheduled to testify before Congress last month, but an illness, a concussion and a blood clot near her brain forced her to postpone her appearance.</p><p>Her marathon day on Capitol Hill will probably be her last in Congress before she steps down as secretary of state. President Barack Obama has nominated Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., to succeed her, and his swift Senate confirmation is widely expected. Kerry's confirmation hearing is scheduled for Thursday.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/clinton_to_face_congress_on_libya_assault/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/clinton_to_face_congress_on_libya_assault/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clinton to testify on Libya assault Jan. 22</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/08/clinton_to_testify_on_libya_assault_jan_22_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/08/clinton_to_testify_on_libya_assault_jan_22_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 19:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya embassy attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State DEpartment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13164788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Secretary of State will testify about the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — The top Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee says Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton will testify on the deadly Sept. 11 assault in Libya on Jan. 22.</p><p>That's the day after President Barack Obama's inauguration and the first day the Senate returns to Washington after a two-week break. Sen. Bob Corker of Tennessee disclosed the date in an interview on MSNBC. There was no official word from the committee.</p><p>Clinton had been scheduled to testify last month but fell during an illness and suffered a concussion. She was recently hospitalized for a blood clot.</p><p>Clinton returned to work on Monday. She had promised to appear before the Senate and House foreign affairs panels before stepping down from her job. Obama has nominated Sen. John Kerry to replace her.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/08/clinton_to_testify_on_libya_assault_jan_22_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/08/clinton_to_testify_on_libya_assault_jan_22_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State Department faulted over Benghazi attacks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/state_department_faulted_over_benghazi_attacks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/state_department_faulted_over_benghazi_attacks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 14:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GlobalPost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State DEpartment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13149580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will the findings of the Accountability Review Board taint Hillary Clinton's 4-year tenure as Secretary of State?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.globalpost.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_globalPostInline.gif" alt="Global Post" align="left" /></a> The State Department has come up for harsh criticism in an official report that cites "grossly inadequate" security at America's mission in Benghazi during the Sept. 11 attacks that killed US Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens and three others.</p><p>The leaders of an independent panel issued the scathing assessment in a review that, <a href="http://www.jpost.com/International/Article.aspx?id=296533" target="_blank">according to Reuters</a>, found "leadership and management" deficiencies in the department and "real confusion" in Washington and in the field over who could — and should — have made decisions involving security.</p><p>The findings of the Accountability Review Board, some of which are classified and will only be heard behind closed doors before the House and Senate foreign affairs committees, may taint the four-year tenure of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Reuters wrote.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/state_department_faulted_over_benghazi_attacks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/state_department_faulted_over_benghazi_attacks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Benghazi review finds &#8220;systematic&#8221; security faults</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/benghazi_review_finds_systematic_security_faults/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/benghazi_review_finds_systematic_security_faults/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 13:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State DEpartment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13149491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Bureau of Diplomatic Security and the Bureau of Near East Affairs were singled out for criticism]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — An independent panel charged with investigating the deadly Sept. 11 attack in Libya that killed a U.S. ambassador and three other Americans has concluded that systematic management and leadership failures at the State Department led to "grossly" inadequate security at the mission in Benghazi.</p><p>"Systematic failures and leadership and management deficiencies at senior levels within two bureaus of the State Department resulted in a Special Mission security posture that was inadequate for Benghazi and grossly inadequate to deal with the attack that took place," the panel said.</p><p>The report singled out the Bureau of Diplomatic Security and the Bureau of Near East Affairs for criticism, saying there appeared to be a lack of cooperation and confusion over protection at the mission in Benghazi, a city in Eastern Libya that was relatively lawless after the revolution that toppled Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi.</p><p>Despite those failures, the Accountability Review Board determined that no individual officials ignored or violated their duties and recommended no disciplinary action now. But it also said poor performance by senior managers should be grounds for disciplinary recommendations in the future.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/benghazi_review_finds_systematic_security_faults/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/benghazi_review_finds_systematic_security_faults/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Susan Rice withdraws candidacy for secretary of state</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/susan_rice_withdraws_nomination_for_secretary_of_state/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/susan_rice_withdraws_nomination_for_secretary_of_state/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 21:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Rice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secretary of State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13124235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After repeated GOP attacks, she says the nomination process for secretary of state would be "disruptive and costly"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amid John McCain's continued threats to block her nomination, U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice announced that she will withdraw her candidacy for secretary of state.</p><p>"If nominated, I am now convinced that the confirmation process would be lengthy, disruptive and costly -- to you and to our most pressing national and international priorities," Rice wrote in a <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/r/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2012/12/13/National-Politics/Graphics/SER-letter.pdf">letter</a> to President Obama, NBC News first reported. "That trade-off is simply not worth it to our country ... Therefore, I respectfully request that you no longer consider my candidacy at this time."</p><p>"The position of Secretary of State should never be politicized," Rice continued. "As someone who grew up in an era of comparative bipartisanship and as a sitting U.S. national security official who has served in two U.S. Administrations, I am saddened that we have reached this point, even before you have decided whom to nominate. We cannot afford such an irresponsible distraction from the most pressing issues facing the American people."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/susan_rice_withdraws_nomination_for_secretary_of_state/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/susan_rice_withdraws_nomination_for_secretary_of_state/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
