<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > literature</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/literature_2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 15:51:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Contemporary literature&#8217;s obesity epidemic</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/contemporary_literatures_obesity_epidemic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/contemporary_literatures_obesity_epidemic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LA Review of Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obesity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Kimball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13157505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Novels like Michael Kimball's "Big Ray" reveal that corpulence has become a go-to metaphor for emotional unrest]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lareviewofbooks.org/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/LARB_LOGO_RED_LIGHT1.jpg" alt="Los Angeles Review of Books" align="left" /></a></p><p>AT OVER 500 POUNDS, the title character of Michael Kimball’s <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/1608198545/?tag=saloncom08-20">Big Ray</a></em> is too big to fit in most chairs so he usually sits on the floor. After he dies, his son remembers that the only way Big Ray could stand up was “in stages”:</p><blockquote><p>He needed to hold on to something he could push or pull — a door, a chair, or another piece of furniture. Then he would roll over onto his side and up onto his knees while pushing or pulling his upper body up. From his knees, he would get one foot flat on the ground and then the other foot. [...] Once his legs were under him, he could raise his upper body until he was standing upright.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/contemporary_literatures_obesity_epidemic/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/contemporary_literatures_obesity_epidemic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paul Thomas Anderson on upcoming Pynchon adaptation: Screenplay is &#8220;more secretarial&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/paul_thomas_anderson_on_upcoming_pynchon_adaptation_screenplay_is_more_secretarial/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/paul_thomas_anderson_on_upcoming_pynchon_adaptation_screenplay_is_more_secretarial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 20:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Thomas Anderson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inherent vice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Pynchon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Novels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film adaptations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13155963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The director says his next film will be a close adaptation of "Inherent Vice"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a profile issued online today by the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/30/movies/awardsseason/paul-thomas-anderson-on-preparing-for-and-following-up-the-master.html?pagewanted=1&amp;ref=movies">New York Times</a>, preeminent director Paul Thomas Anderson, who researched Scientology extensively to portray the relationship between the cult leader (Philip Seymour Hoffman) and a veteran (Joaquin Phoenix) in 2012's critically acclaimed "The Master," also elaborated on his upcoming project, an adaptation of Thomas Pynchon's 2009 novel "Inherent Vice." Although news of the project has been around for a while, Anderson revealed new details about its vision and hinted at a possible collaboration with the reclusive author:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/paul_thomas_anderson_on_upcoming_pynchon_adaptation_screenplay_is_more_secretarial/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/paul_thomas_anderson_on_upcoming_pynchon_adaptation_screenplay_is_more_secretarial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mr. Joan Didion</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/25/mr_joan_didion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/25/mr_joan_didion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2012 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joan Didion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Gregory Dunne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Play It As It Lays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13153736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exploring the works of John Gregory Dunne, it's all but impossible to discern where husband ends and wife begins]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://http://theamericanreader.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/12/Reader-Logo_new-e1356276691945.jpg" alt="The American Reader" align="left" /></a> <em>Joan Didion</em>. The name alone conjures up an ocean of descriptive phrases in which one could drown. Here is but a small helping: In <em>Salon</em>, Kyle Minor called her “the most consistently interesting and quotable essayist in the English language.” In<em>Intelligent Life</em> magazine, Robert Butler echoes that sentiment, labeling her first-person voice “cool” and “incisive.” “The writer who expressed most eloquently the eternal-girl impulse,” Caitlin Flanagan recently dubbed Didion in <em>The Atlantic</em>. A visit to the Amazon page of but one of her fourteen books yields “taut, clear-eyed,” “extraordinarily poignant,” “achingly beautiful,” and, about the book peddled at this particular URL, “a remarkably lucid and ennobling anatomy of grief.”</p><p>But goodbye to all that, for now.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/25/mr_joan_didion/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/25/mr_joan_didion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lydia Millet&#8217;s &#8220;Magnificence&#8221; offers anything but</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/25/lydia_millets_magnificence_offers_anything_but/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/25/lydia_millets_magnificence_offers_anything_but/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LA Review of Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lydia Millet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13152743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The writer's latest novel is brimming with potential, but ultimately falls flat]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fifty pages into Lydia Millet’s novel <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0393081702/?tag=saloncom08-20">"Magnificence,"</a> her heroine Susan Lindley, a recently widowed secretary, inherits an enormous mansion from an uncle she barely knew. The mansion, located in an upscale neighborhood of Pasadena, is filled with a small museum’s worth of stuffed wild animals: gazelles, a full-grown lion, eagles and owls, a pink flamingo, and an entire room full of bears.</p><p>The novel, which until this point has been flatlining through page after page of perfunctory-seeming scenes of Susan being angry at herself for not mourning her late husband enough, suddenly perks up as the reader thinks: What a great place to set a novel. Then, for another hundred pages or so, it becomes clear that this weird old house full of dead animals isn’t so much the setting for Millet’s novel as a distressingly accurate metaphor for the experience of reading it.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/25/lydia_millets_magnificence_offers_anything_but/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/25/lydia_millets_magnificence_offers_anything_but/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Red science vs. blue science</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/red_science_vs_blue_science/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/red_science_vs_blue_science/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13152714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two 2012 titles offer two very different explanations for the war on science. Both are disturbing and discouraging]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> Times of intense ideological polarization are always dreary for reasonable people. Consider the Marquis de Condorcet, a brilliant scientist, mathematician, and political philosopher who was forced into hiding during the French Revolution after running afoul of the radical followers of Robespierre. During his months as a fugitive, Condorcet penned a treatise—now considered a major text of the Enlightenment—that envisioned a society founded on the principles of free inquiry, critical thinking, and science. But the nobleman was caught, and his vision for France died with him in a revolutionary prison cell.</p><p>Condorcet’s story opens "The Republican Brain," the science writer Chris Mooney’s lament about today’s polarized intellectual climate. Mooney mourns the death of Condorcet’s enlightened vision, and I suspect Alex Berezow and Hank Campbell would as well. Like Mooney’s, their new book, "Science Left Behind," describes a 21st-century American society that is the exact opposite of what Condorcet wanted and predicted. Both books condemn the magical thinking and distorted passions that shape our modern intellectual enterprise and diminish our lives.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/red_science_vs_blue_science/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/red_science_vs_blue_science/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>110</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can children&#8217;s literature teach us about autism?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/can_childrens_literature_teach_us_about_autism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/can_childrens_literature_teach_us_about_autism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Autism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brothers Grimm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carl Zimmer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13135536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Autism and Talent" author Uta Frith explains why the disorder continues to fascinate her]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://thebrowser.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://thebrowser.com/sites/all/themes/brw/logo.png" alt="The Browser" width="150" align="left" /></a> <strong>Tell me about your first book, <em>Fairy Tales</em> by the Brothers Grimm.</strong></p><p>I think that almost all of us have been influenced by <em>Fairy Tales</em>. And that is particularly true in my case. There weren’t that many children’s books when I grew up and they were read to me again and again. Later on when I could first read I had a wonderfully illustrated book of <em>Grimm’s Fairy Tales</em>, which I treasured.</p><p>I think they are the stories that give you a lasting sense of wonder. They let you experience unexpected events and often terrifying ones. And, fortunately, everything comes out right in the end. They are stark tales and written in very basic language. There are wonderful images to nourish your imagination for life, for example Snow White in the glass case. I see this as an image that chimes in with ideas that were current when we were just becoming aware of autism in the middle of the 20th century: the idea of a beautiful but unreachable child. What might be going on inside her mind? How can she be woken up? In the tale there was a simple cause, a poisoned apple, and a simple and totally accidental cure. The apple was only stuck in the throat and came out again. It is a completely false image, but a very striking one. Sadly, the causes of autism remain unknown and there is no cure.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/can_childrens_literature_teach_us_about_autism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/can_childrens_literature_teach_us_about_autism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do playwrights make good novelists?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/do_playwrights_make_good_novelists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/do_playwrights_make_good_novelists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LA Review of Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deborah Levy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swimming Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maggie Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judy Dench]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13129162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the riveting new "Swimming Home," author Deborah Levy makes a compelling case]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DEBORAH LEVY’S NEW BOOK <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/162040169X/?tag=saloncom08-20">"Swimming Home"</a> is constructed like a play — with a central stage and a cast of characters, and it unfolds like a drama in hot short vignettes — but it reads like a novel, and Levy jumps in and out of her character’s heads with such ferocious abandon that the story becomes a sun-splashed psychotic episode, an exploration of desire turned masochistic and lives propelled by the arrhythmic pulse of insanity.</p><p>That there is an inherent theatricality to the presentation shouldn’t be surprising. Levy is a noted playwright, the author of <em>Macbeth — False Memories </em>and <em>Honey Baby Middle England, </em>among others. The swimming pool serves as the main stage — a platform for arrivals and departures, bee stings, skinny dipping, misunderstandings, and menstruations — and there is a French country house attached to the pool where more intimate moments unravel.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/do_playwrights_make_good_novelists/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/do_playwrights_make_good_novelists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Rise of Ransom City&#8221;: Steampunk Western</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/16/the_rise_of_ransom_city_steampunk_western/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/16/the_rise_of_ransom_city_steampunk_western/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2012 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Rise of Ransom City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Half-Made World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Felix Gilman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steampunk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Fiction and Fantasy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fantasy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Westerns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What to Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13146238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Felix Gilman's fantasy of a roving frontier inventor captures the dangerous delusions of the American Dream]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Compared to British fantasists, American writers have often felt the lack of a deeply rooted national mythos. In place of ancient folklore handed down from generation to generation, we have a shallow, polyglot history imposed over a native culture that was demonized and in many cases eradicated by European settlers. American writers ranging from Stephen King to Michael Chabon have tried to fill this archetype gap, but it isn't always easy to create imagery and ideas that resonate, which is one reason why so much fantasy falls back on Anglo-Saxon and Celtic motifs.</p><p>Felix Gilman's two vaguely steampunkish novels, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/B005DI8998/?tag=saloncom08-20">"The Half-Made World"</a> and the just-published <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0765329409/?tag=saloncom08-20">"The Rise of Ransom City,"</a> come closer than many previous efforts to nailing America's conflicted collective unconscious. The setting is not, of course, called America (any more than Middle-earth is called England). Nevertheless, it's instantly recognizable as a version of the Wild West, a frontier land with towns named Clementine, Gibson or Jasper City, sandwiched between the distant, civilized East and, to the West, a region known only as the Rim. Way out West, as Harry Ransom, the narrator of "The Rise of Ransom City," explains it, are "territories where the future was still open, where laws were still unsettled -- I mean not least what they call <em>the laws of nature,</em> which as everyone knows are different on the Rim."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/16/the_rise_of_ransom_city_steampunk_western/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/16/the_rise_of_ransom_city_steampunk_western/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Christopher Hitchens proved that nothing is sacred</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/how_christopher_hitchens_proved_that_nothing_is_sacred/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/how_christopher_hitchens_proved_that_nothing_is_sacred/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 15:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Listener]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audiobooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks: Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Hitchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mother Teresa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13120716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The late author's now-classic "The Missionary Position," a takedown of Mother Teresa, resonates even louder today]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the foreword to "The Missionary Position: Mother Teresa in Theory and Practice," Christopher Hitchens imagined the question he invited by writing the book: “Who would be so base as to pick on her, a wizened, shriveled old lady, well stricken in years, who has consecrated her entire life to the needy and the destitute?”</p><p>The short version of Hitchens’s answer: Me.</p><p>His longer version: The implied question “Is nothing sacred?” must always be answered “with a stoical ‘No.’”</p><p>This fierce stance was central to Hitchens’s work, and now that he has been dead for a year, and Mother Teresa has been dead for 15 years, the reissue of "The Missionary Position" as an audiobook is less an opportunity to revisit the history of their disagreement (his explicit, hers implicit) than it is an opportunity to remember the value of Hitchens’s great pugnacious willingness to examine, in cold detail, the things the culture has enshrined, and to “scorn to use the fear of death to coerce and flatter the poor.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/how_christopher_hitchens_proved_that_nothing_is_sacred/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/how_christopher_hitchens_proved_that_nothing_is_sacred/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stop giving war-veteran novelists a free pass</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/stop_giving_war_veteran_novelists_a_free_pass/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/stop_giving_war_veteran_novelists_a_free_pass/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Powers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[veterans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tobias Wolff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cormac McCarthy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13120971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["The Yellow Birds" is considered one of this year's best books. Are reviewers too scared to pan our servicemen?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the most feted books of the season is a debut novel about the Iraq war, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/031621936/?tag=saloncom08-20">Kevin Powers' “The Yellow Birds.”</a> It has garnered gushing blurbs from famous authors, the cover of <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/07/books/review/the-yellow-birds-by-kevin-powers.html?pagewanted=all">the New York Times Book Review</a>, a National Book Award nomination, TV appearances, the Guardian First Book Award, and laudatory reviews from nearly every corner of the literary establishment. And this past weekend it added a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/09/books/review/10-best-books-of-2012.html?ref=review">New York Times Best Book of 2012</a> to the list. By general consensus, “The Yellow Birds” is a classic of war literature.</p><p>There’s just one little problem: The novel doesn’t measure up to the praise.</p><p>Indeed, the book is beset by so many deficiencies you’re tempted to wonder what the critics have been smoking. The answer, in the words of one veteran friend, is <em>Martialuana</em>. Let me define the term I've coined: It's a stimulant, known to effect in its user a long-lasting, sometimes undeserved, high about American armed service members and veterans. Prevalent in establishment circles. Often used to assuage guilt for the burden veterans have borne over the last decade.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/stop_giving_war_veteran_novelists_a_free_pass/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/stop_giving_war_veteran_novelists_a_free_pass/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lena Dunham gets snippy with Gawker</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/lena_dunham_gets_snippy_with_gawker/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/lena_dunham_gets_snippy_with_gawker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lena Dunham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13121232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The "Girls" star is not pleased that the media outlet shared part of her $3.7 million book proposal]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last Friday, Gawker <a href="http://gawker.com/5966563/here-is-lena-dunhams-37-million-book-proposal">published</a> "Girls" creator Lena Dunham's proposal for her $3.7 million book deal. The book, "Not That Kind of Girl," is pitched as a funny lady-advice book about life and relationships. The assumption is that whatever Dunham might lack in experience she makes up for in wit.</p><p>But last week Gawker got ahold of the proposal, publishing it and annotating 12 choice lines (one of which mentions that her "vegan dinner party" was featured in the New York Times) with a dose of snark. Dunham's lawyer asked Gawker to take the proposal down (and it did). But now Deadline reports that Dunham wants the 12 lines to be taken down, too.</p><p>Deadline notes that "<a href="http://www.deadline.com/2012/12/lena-dunham-touchy-touchy-touchy-about-her-3-5m-book-proposal/">this is hardball</a>":</p><blockquote><p>This is hardball: Harder represented himself to Gawker’s attorney as “litigation  counsel for author and actress Lena Dunham [and] Lena Dunham has retained an attorney to demand that Gawker remove 12 quotes from her book propsal from our site,” an insider tells me.  (I hear Random House isn’t bitching to Gawker, only Dunham.)</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/lena_dunham_gets_snippy_with_gawker/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/lena_dunham_gets_snippy_with_gawker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Must-see morning clip</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/must_see_morning_clip_75/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/must_see_morning_clip_75/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elie wiesel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must see morning clip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oprah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13120221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nobel winner Elie Wiesel talks about death and what happens to the soul with Oprah]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eighty-four year old "Night" author Elie Wiesel tells Oprah Winfrey that when he won the Nobel Prize, he saw his deceased father in the hall. Though he wanted to join his father on "the other side," Wiesel explains that he had "more things to do," and hasn't "even begun."</p><p><iframe width="400" height="225" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/cgWJrLn2SGk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/must_see_morning_clip_75/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/must_see_morning_clip_75/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to live well: A handy reading list</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/how_to_live_well_a_handy_reading_list/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/how_to_live_well_a_handy_reading_list/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Orwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry David Thoreau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Down and Out in Paris and London]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13119338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Philosopher Roman Krznaric discusses the five books that have helped shape his work, from Orwell to Thoreau]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://thebrowser.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://thebrowser.com/sites/all/themes/brw/logo.png" alt="The Browser" width="150" align="left" /></a> <strong>Over the New Year, people will be looking at themselves, making resolutions, starting afresh. Do you think that this introspection is a good thing, or are we too full of anxiety when we re-evaluate our lives?</strong></p><p>It’s important to keep asking yourself the question, what am I doing with my life? Shall I go in new directions? Throughout history there have always been people who have been interested in this question. Tolstoy, for example, was always asking himself whether he was doing the right thing with his life.</p><p>Of course, the New Year is a great peg to hang these questions. The real issue, though, is how we go about making changes in our lives. I like to make a distinction between introspection and outrospection. In the 20th century we were obsessed with introspection – the idea that the way to find meaning in our lives is to look inside us, at our drives, motivations and priorities. That introspective approach really comes out of psychoanalysis and the self-help industry.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/how_to_live_well_a_handy_reading_list/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/how_to_live_well_a_handy_reading_list/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bilbo Baggins says, &#8220;Buy this!&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/bilbo_baggins_says_buy_this/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/bilbo_baggins_says_buy_this/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.R.R. Tolkien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hobbit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lord of the Rings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13110760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Behold the onslaught of Hobbit action figures. Hobbit Legos. Hobbit meals. If only they did this to "Anna Karenina"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After Peter Jackson’s “The Lord of the Rings” ruled the megaplexes for most of the early years of this century, it was inevitable that “The Hobbit” would follow. What was perhaps also inevitable — given the way the film industry and popular culture, in general, operates these days — is that after turning J.R.R. Tolkien’s massive three-book fantasy trilogy into a massive three-film fantasy trilogy, Warner Brothers and New Line Cinema would turn the slender folk-tale prequel into … another massive three-film fantasy trilogy.</p><p>That Hollywood is driven more by market forces than by artistic ones is a cliché so old it’s almost become axiomatic. Blame the collapse of the studio system in the 1960s. Hollywood did just fine when all the major studios were in the business of creating, as well as financing, the films bearing their logos; they even went so far as to seek out new talent, nurture it, and develop it over the course of years. Today, studios are just the money men, and projects are developed by independent production companies — every actor and director has his or her own — and then brought to MGM or Fox or Disney in supplication with the hope of a big, fat bankroll.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/bilbo_baggins_says_buy_this/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/bilbo_baggins_says_buy_this/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dungeons and Dragons: My dorky literary muse</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/dungeons_and_dragons_my_dorky_literary_muse/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/dungeons_and_dragons_my_dorky_literary_muse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Weeklings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dungeons and Dragons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MFA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13119081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As an MFA student, my fiction was derivative. Then I reconnected with my inner Dungeon Master and found my voice]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Writing is all about character.”</p><p>That’s what they tell you, right?</p><p>By they, of course, I mean the majority of professors in MFA programs in Writing the country over–MFA programs, it might be said, that have propagated in recent years like churches of a new religion, departments filled with spectacled prophets at the pulpit, elating the instantly talented, while leaving the unlucky, or underdeveloped, to recoil from the successes of their peers.</p><p>Brooding around classroom tables, graduate writing students are set up to test their might. Their mentors, published authors of various degrees of repute, discuss prose and structure, poetics and politics, honesty and art. Character, however, they tell you–especially in fiction–is the key to a good story. And they tell you this essentially because they are correct. There are many things that novelists have to learn in order to actually turn their scribbles into marketable merchandise, and those things don’t necessarily need to be learned by dishing out the equivalent of a down-payment on a home. But if I walked away with anything from my MFA, it is that character is what makes a book readable. For someone, anyone, to pay tens of dollars to read what someone other than them has decided is worthwhile, they should be able to do so knowing that the imaginary people they’ll be spending the next 20 hours of their life with are at least a little complex (unless superficial husks are your <em>shtick</em>).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/dungeons_and_dragons_my_dorky_literary_muse/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/dungeons_and_dragons_my_dorky_literary_muse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Getting extremely loud, incredibly close with Hunter Thompson</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/getting_extremely_loud_incredibly_close_with_hunter_thompson/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/getting_extremely_loud_incredibly_close_with_hunter_thompson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Listener]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hunter S. Thompson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audio Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13117334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hunter S. Thompson's wild ride of a book, "Screwjack," offers a blueprint to the writer's entire career]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is an oft-repeated maxim that the best literary books don’t always make for pleasurable listening when they become audiobooks, and that books that sometimes seemed thin in print can be redeemed by the ear. Perhaps this is because the audiobook, as a form, is better suited to entertainment than to weightiness, to brevity than to length, to raucous event than to expansive reflection.</p><p>So it is with Hunter S. Thompson’s “Screwjack,” a brief, loud, sometimes incoherent miscellany in print, which becomes, in the audio edition, a pleasurable way to fritter away an hour.</p><p>The audiobook benefits from a strong performance by Scott Sowers, a prolific narrator notable for his ability to change his delivery, and even the quality of his voice, from book to book. In mainstream novels of sensation, such as John Grisham’s “The Confession” or Douglas Preston’s “Impact,” Sowers modulates his cadences up and down to fit the rises and falls of the action, veering from restraint to urgency. In Thomas Wolfe’s “Look Homeward Angel,” his delivery turns stately, to match Wolfe’s elegiac tone.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/getting_extremely_loud_incredibly_close_with_hunter_thompson/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/getting_extremely_loud_incredibly_close_with_hunter_thompson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mo Yan says censorship is necessary</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/nobel_literature_winner_says_censorship_necessary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/nobel_literature_winner_says_censorship_necessary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mo Yan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nobel Prize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/nobel_literature_winner_says_censorship_necessary/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Nobel literature winner has been oft-criticized for his relationship with China's Communist Party]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>STOCKHOLM (AP) — Nobel Prize laureate Mo Yan, who has been criticized for his cozy relationship with China's Communist Party, has compared censorship to security checks at airports, suggesting it is unpleasant but necessary.</p><p>Mo says he does not believe censorship should stand in the way of truth, but that it can be used, or is sometimes even necessary, to stop rumors and defamation.</p><p>China's first writer to win the Nobel Prize for Literature is in Stockholm, where he is set to receive the prestigious prize next week.</p><p>Mo dodged questions about fellow writer and compatriot Liu Xiaobo, who won the Peace Prize in 2010 but remains in prison. Mo has previously said that he hopes Liu will be free soon, but he refused to elaborate Thursday while meeting with journalists in Stockholm.</p><p><script type='text/javascript' src='http://pshared.5min.com/Scripts/PlayerSeed.js?sid=1236&amp;width=420&amp;height=280&amp;shuffle=0&amp;playList=517505707'></script></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/nobel_literature_winner_says_censorship_necessary/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/nobel_literature_winner_says_censorship_necessary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My dinner with Philip Roth</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/my_dinner_with_philip_roth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/my_dinner_with_philip_roth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 20:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Jewish Daily Forward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philip Roth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Plot Against America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychoanalysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Satire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13116082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[His retirement announcement several weeks ago came as no surprise. He told me himself that he was "kaput"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As word came over the transom last week (an actual transom, since I don’t have a working computer) that Philip Roth was retiring, I dismissed it as old, dull news. I’d read the report in the original French, and translated it myself into Turkish and then into Swiss-German just for fun. Then, along with the rest of the literate world, I’d read about it in the Times, which described Roth as a mentally healthy gentleman, happy with his lot.</p><p>I knew he was putting on an act, because I’d already heard the opposite from the horse’s mouth. “The Horse” is what I’d called Roth when he and I shared an office space in the late 60s while he was working on Portnoy’s Complaint and I was working on a similar but superior work, Feldman’s Penis. Roth had earned his nickname because he ate a lot of apples and oats, and also because he loved to saddle up with the shiksas. No one knows a writer as well as his contemporaries. Roth and I are as contemporary as they get.</p><p>One morning a few months ago, as I sat in my third-floor study in my chateau near the summit of Mount Winchester, my rotary phone rang downstairs. My beleaguered manservant Roger answered it, and came knocking at my door a minute later.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/my_dinner_with_philip_roth/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/my_dinner_with_philip_roth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Winfrey picks Ayana Mathis’ debut novel for book club</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/winfrey_picks_mathis%e2%80%99_debut_novel_for_book_club/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/winfrey_picks_mathis%e2%80%99_debut_novel_for_book_club/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 16:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oprah Winfrey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ayana Mathis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oprah's Book Club]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oprah’s Book Club 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13115863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The celebrated talk show host recommends the debut novel "The Twelve Tribes of Hattie"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NEW YORK (AP) — Add another book for possible holiday gifts: Oprah Winfrey’s latest “2.0″ selection.</p><p>Winfrey announced Wednesday that she has chosen a debut novel for her book club, “The Twelve Tribes of Hattie,” by Ayana Mathis. An author interview will be aired Feb. 3 on Winfrey’s OWN network. In a statement, Winfrey likened Mathis’ book to the fiction of Toni Morrison. Published this week by Alfred A. Knopf, “Twelve Tribes” tells of a teenager’s journey from Mississippi to Philadelphia in the 1920s and the large family she ends up raising.</p><p>Winfrey revived her club, now called Oprah’s Book Club 2.0, earlier this year with Cheryl Strayed’s memoir “Wild.” Dozens of books over the past 20 years have become bestsellers thanks to the talk show host’s endorsements.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/winfrey_picks_mathis%e2%80%99_debut_novel_for_book_club/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/winfrey_picks_mathis%e2%80%99_debut_novel_for_book_club/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>E.L. James named publishing person of the year</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/e_l_james_named_publishing_person_of_the_year/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/e_l_james_named_publishing_person_of_the_year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 20:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fifty Shades of Grey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Charles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers and Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13114604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Critic Ron Charles is appalled]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Publishers Weekly has pronounced "<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Fifty-Shades-Grey-Book-Trilogy/dp/0345803485/saloncom08-20">Fifty Shades of Grey</a>" novelist E.L. James the publishing person of the year, a decision about as shocking as her books' brand of light bondage. Still, it wouldn't be publishing if there wasn't a bit of righteous indignation. Fortunately the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/arts-post/post/el-james-publishing-person-of-the-year/2012/12/03/8dae8adc-3d86-11e2-ae43-cf491b837f7b_blog.html">Washington Post</a>'s "totally hip book reviewer"  Ron Charles wears his lightly. Still, if he had a grave he'd be spinning in it.</p><p>Watch:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Hqy8zAdfNEU?list=UUJAn03-_nxsWRIjMVvn-pBQ&amp;hl=en_US" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/e_l_james_named_publishing_person_of_the_year/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/e_l_james_named_publishing_person_of_the_year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>