<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Liz Cheney</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/liz_cheney/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:30:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Dick Cheney interviewed by Liz Cheney at &#8220;Ideas Forum&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/07/dick_cheney_interviewed_by_liz_cheney_at_ideas_forum/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/07/dick_cheney_interviewed_by_liz_cheney_at_ideas_forum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 15:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liz Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atlantic Media Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry Kissinger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cheney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10105045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This week, the Atlantic Media Co. held its <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/special-report/washington-ideas-forum-2011/">"Washington Ideas Forum,"</a> one of many regular events held for Washington's political elite to gather and congratulate themselves for having so many ideas. The Atlantic -- which also publishes a monthly magazine, I'm told -- throws these pricey orgies of self-regard each year, in Washington and <a href="http://politics.salon.com/2011/06/29/nuke_aspen/singleton/">Aspen</a>. One of the big "ideas" presented at this year's forum was actually a pretty old one: that no matter how awful and criminal certain people's behavior is in office, they will never, ever be kicked out of the Washington elite.</p><p>That's why the forum <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2011/10/conclusion-of-the-washington-ideas-forum/246306/#slide1">hosted Henry Kissinger</a>, this big idea's mascot. And that's why the forum ended with an interview with former Vice President Dick Cheney, who has a memoir to promote. Cheney was joined onstage by his daughter and co-author, Liz Cheney, who is devoting herself to whitewashing her father's legacy of torture and death and shooting old men in the face.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/07/dick_cheney_interviewed_by_liz_cheney_at_ideas_forum/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/07/dick_cheney_interviewed_by_liz_cheney_at_ideas_forum/">http://www.salon.com/2011/10/07/dick_cheney_interviewed_by_liz_cheney_at_ideas_forum/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/07/dick_cheney_interviewed_by_liz_cheney_at_ideas_forum/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/07/dick_cheney_interviewed_by_liz_cheney_at_ideas_forum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meet the Ground Zero rogues</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/25/ground_zero_rogues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/25/ground_zero_rogues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Park51]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liz Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/07/25/ground_zero_rogues</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The project seems innocent enough: A progressive Muslim group wants to build Cordoba House, a community center modeled after the YMCA near the old World Trade Center site. New York's mayor, Michael Bloomberg, is all for it, and the local community board has signed off on it. But that means nothing to a fervent crew of right-wing Islamophobes -- including a gold-crazed televangelist birther, a businessman with a taste for racist and graphically sexual e-mails, and the New York Post -- have banded together to recast the project as the "Ground Zero mosque." In the following slide show, we introduce you to the rogues' gallery of "Ground Zero mosque" opponents.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/07/25/ground_zero_rogues/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The project seems innocent enough: A progressive Muslim group wants to build Cordoba House, a community center modeled after the YMCA near the old World Trade Center site. New York&#8217;s mayor, Michael Bloomberg, is all for it, and the local community board has signed off on it. But that means nothing to a fervent crew of right-wing Islamophobes &#8212; including a gold-crazed televangelist birther, a businessman with a taste for racist and graphically sexual e-mails, and the New York Post &#8212; have banded together to recast the project as the &#8220;Ground Zero mosque.&#8221; In the following slide show, we introduce you to the rogues&#8217; gallery of &#8220;Ground Zero mosque&#8221; opponents.</p><p><a href='/2010/07/25/ground_zero_rogues/slide_show/'>View the slide show</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/07/25/ground_zero_rogues/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/25/ground_zero_rogues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>200</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liz Cheney demands Obama reverse position that unnecessary death is &#8220;tragic&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/04/liz_cheney_tragic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/04/liz_cheney_tragic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 20:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel Flotilla Attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liz Cheney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/06/04/liz_cheney_tragic</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Liz Cheney desperately needed to find some excuse to fault Barack Obama for not being Cheney-ish enough in his response to the Israeli flotilla attack. There's only one problem: In American politics, Republicans <em>and</em> Democrats agree that Israel can and must shoot whomever it wants to -- even American citizens! -- to protect itself from the very real threat posed by the potential delivery of toys to desperately impoverished Palestinians.</p><p>So Obama's response has been tepid and "neutral" (read: pretty much toothless). So Liz is just grabbing onto whatever she can to convince Americans that the president is not willing to do what it takes to protect us from... some sort of nuclear slingshot aimed at America, from Gaza (or perhaps a "sharpened pole" long enough to <em>reach our shores</em>):</p><p>
    <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plum-line/2010/06/liz_cheney_attacks_obama_for_s.html?wprss=plum-line">This is what she came up with:</a>
  </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/04/liz_cheney_tragic/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liz Cheney desperately needed to find some excuse to fault Barack Obama for not being Cheney-ish enough in his response to the Israeli flotilla attack. There&#8217;s only one problem: In American politics, Republicans <em>and</em> Democrats agree that Israel can and must shoot whomever it wants to &#8212; even American citizens! &#8212; to protect itself from the very real threat posed by the potential delivery of toys to desperately impoverished Palestinians.</p><p>So Obama&#8217;s response has been tepid and &#8220;neutral&#8221; (read: pretty much toothless). So Liz is just grabbing onto whatever she can to convince Americans that the president is not willing to do what it takes to protect us from&#8230; some sort of nuclear slingshot aimed at America, from Gaza (or perhaps a &#8220;sharpened pole&#8221; long enough to <em>reach our shores</em>):</p><p>
    <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plum-line/2010/06/liz_cheney_attacks_obama_for_s.html?wprss=plum-line">This is what she came up with:</a>
  </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/04/liz_cheney_tragic/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/04/liz_cheney_tragic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>132</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liz Cheney attacks Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/09/liz_cheney_attacks_obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/09/liz_cheney_attacks_obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liz Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/04/08/liz_cheney_attacks_obama</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Liz Cheney wasn't exactly shy about going after President Obama in her speech at the opening session of the Southern Republican Leadership Conference here.</p><p>"President Obama should stop apologizing for this great nation and start defending it," she said, in one of several lines in her 30 minute speech that won big ovations from the crowd. Other bits of Cheney wisdom that went over big:</p><ul>
<li>"Somebody needs to keep reminding this administration that foreign terrorists do not have constitutional rights."</li>
<li>"The media has played this up as a confrontation between Dick Cheney and Barack Obama.&#160;I prefer to think of it as a constructive dialog -- between a two-term vice president and a one-term president."</li>
<li>"Regardless of massive public disapproval of the healthcare plan, this president rammed it through on a partisan vote. President Obama's phony numbers are about to become our very real problem."</li>
<li>"One of the greatest thinkers of our time, in my opinion, is Charles Krauthammer."</li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/09/liz_cheney_attacks_obama/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/09/liz_cheney_attacks_obama/">http://www.salon.com/2010/04/09/liz_cheney_attacks_obama/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/09/liz_cheney_attacks_obama/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/09/liz_cheney_attacks_obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>172</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ken Starr vs. Liz Cheney</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/09/liz_cheney_vs_ken_starr/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/09/liz_cheney_vs_ken_starr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 02:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liz Cheney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh//politics/2010/03/08/liz_cheney_vs_ken_starr</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Right now I'm watching Kenneth Starr denounce Liz Cheney on MSNBC's "Countdown," and it's very disorienting. Starr was one of the villains of Clinton's impeachment, dragging his investigation far beyond the Whitewater questions that triggered it, leading the nation through a tale of stained blue dresses, sad Oval Office trysts and more than we ever needed to know about cigars. But he's delivering sense about our justice system tonight on MSNBC. Saying something nice about Ken Starr on Salon might cause our servers to meltdown &#8211; but I'm going to have to. Liz Cheney made it happen.</p><p>Even Starr is outraged by Cheney's despicable attack on Justice Department lawyers who've defended terror suspects in their past. She's labeled the group "the al Qaida seven," and suggested they should be ineligible for Justice Department work.</p><p>By contrast Starr called such work "in the finest traditions of the country." He noted that American founder and president John Adams "represented the British redcoats who were accused of the Boston Massacre &#8211; and he successfully defended seven of the British troops who were accused of these crimes." Starr worked in Atticus Finch from "To Kill a Mockingbird," remembering Finch told his kids "'I've got to do this as a matter of conscience,' and it was the conscience of a great profession&#8230; One needs to be courageous at times and stand up to power."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/09/liz_cheney_vs_ken_starr/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/09/liz_cheney_vs_ken_starr/">http://www.salon.com/2010/03/09/liz_cheney_vs_ken_starr/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/09/liz_cheney_vs_ken_starr/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/09/liz_cheney_vs_ken_starr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>98</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liz Cheney wants to save torture&#8217;s good name (and her dad&#8217;s)</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/08/rehabilitating_cheney/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/08/rehabilitating_cheney/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 12:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liz Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/03/08/rehabilitating_cheney</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Toward the end of their term in office, President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney were fond of saying that they weren&#8217;t worried about their dreadful approval ratings. History would vindicate them, and that's what matters.</p><p>The trouble with waiting for history to vindicate you, though, is that it takes so damn long -- as in centuries after the fact, which is a little too late for gloating.&#160; So it&#8217;s not hard to understand why a group of Cheney-philes is trying to speed up the process a bit.</p><p>But there's a catch:&#160;The effort to rehabilitate and revive Cheney-style politics doesn't revolve around the man himself. Instead, his daughter Liz has taken up the mantle. Running a now-infamous group called <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2009/10/13/america_safe">Keep America Safe</a>, she's vaulted herself&#160; to prominence.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/08/rehabilitating_cheney/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/08/rehabilitating_cheney/">http://www.salon.com/2010/03/08/rehabilitating_cheney/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/08/rehabilitating_cheney/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/08/rehabilitating_cheney/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tearing up the social contract, piece by piece</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/05/keep_america_safe_open2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/05/keep_america_safe_open2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 13:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liz Cheney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2010/03/05/keep_america_safe_open2010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The other day <a href="http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2010/03/teabag-poster-boys-by-digby-mother.html">I wrote</a> about having that sick feeling in my stomach over the latest attack on the social contract with respect to the unemployment benefits extension. I think we always find these attacks startling and somewhat paralyzing when they happen because they go against our instinctive belief in a certain national moral consensus. They are radical propositions that seem so outrageous that we can't believe we have to argue the point until it's too late.</p><p>I used the issue of torture as a previous assault on the social contract and I think it's been born out that as a nation we no longer believe in an absolute prohibition on torture. You'll recall that at one time President Bush very scrupulously insisted "the United States doesn't torture," an odd turn of phrase which was later adopted by President Obama as well. Aside from the legal exposure, I think it was the old tribute vice pays to virtue in that they at least paid lip service to the idea that torture was wrong (even if they winked and nodded to the bloodthirsty sadists while they did it.) Today what we hear are full-throated defenses of torture. They've successfully defined this deviancy down.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/05/keep_america_safe_open2010/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other day <a href="http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2010/03/teabag-poster-boys-by-digby-mother.html">I wrote</a> about having that sick feeling in my stomach over the latest attack on the social contract with respect to the unemployment benefits extension. I think we always find these attacks startling and somewhat paralyzing when they happen because they go against our instinctive belief in a certain national moral consensus. They are radical propositions that seem so outrageous that we can&#8217;t believe we have to argue the point until it&#8217;s too late.</p><p>I used the issue of torture as a previous assault on the social contract and I think it&#8217;s been born out that as a nation we no longer believe in an absolute prohibition on torture. You&#8217;ll recall that at one time President Bush very scrupulously insisted &#8220;the United States doesn&#8217;t torture,&#8221; an odd turn of phrase which was later adopted by President Obama as well. Aside from the legal exposure, I think it was the old tribute vice pays to virtue in that they at least paid lip service to the idea that torture was wrong (even if they winked and nodded to the bloodthirsty sadists while they did it.) Today what we hear are full-throated defenses of torture. They&#8217;ve successfully defined this deviancy down.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/05/keep_america_safe_open2010/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/05/keep_america_safe_open2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Salon Radio:  The lawyers smeared by Liz Cheney</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/03/hafetz_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/03/hafetz_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 14:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liz Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington, D.C.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald//radio/2010/03/03/hafetz</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>
    <strong>(updated below - Update&#160;II)</strong>
  </p><p>As I&#160;noted yesterday, the group run by Liz Cheney and&#160;Bill&#160;Kristol released what is certainly one of the more <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZIxg7LmlEQg&amp;feature=player_embedded">repugnant political ads of the last decade</a>, if not the most repugnant.&#160; It's the type of McCarthyite act which would, if we had any minimal standards in our political culture, result in the shunning of Cheney and Kristol by all decent people&#160;(instead, it will likely land the&#160;Vice&#160;President's daughter on multiple Sunday talk shows where she can pose as an expert on national security).&#160;&#160;The ad brands Eric&#160;Holder's DOJ&#160;the "Department of Jihad"&#160;because it employs 9 lawyers who previously represented Guantanamo detainees&#160;(including Deputy Solicitor General Neal Katyal, who successfully represented the Guantanamo-plaintiffs in the 2006 <em>Hamdan</em> case before the U.S. Supreme Court).&#160; The ad darkly asks of these lawyers: "whose values do they share?," and labels 7 of those unidentified DOJ&#160;lawyers "The Al Qaeda 7." &#160;The premise of the ad is as clear as it insidious:&#160; any lawyers representing <strong>accused</strong> Terrorists are of suspect loyalties and allegiances, are devoted to "jihad,"&#160;and are sympathetic to, if not part of, Al Qaeda&#160;(this profoundly ugly smear campaign began with the <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/11/23/courts/index.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+salon%2Fgreenwald+%28Glenn+Greenwald%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader">always-unhinged</a> Andrew McCarthy in <em>National Review</em>, <a href="http://article.nationalreview.com/print/?q=MzU5NGI4MzNkZTg3MzY5MWQ0ZGQ0ZWJjNGExZDhjOGM=">who branded</a> such lawyers "terrorist sympathizers").</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/03/hafetz_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
    <strong>(updated below &#8211; Update&#160;II)</strong>
  </p><p>As I&#160;noted yesterday, the group run by Liz Cheney and&#160;Bill&#160;Kristol released what is certainly one of the more <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZIxg7LmlEQg&amp;feature=player_embedded">repugnant political ads of the last decade</a>, if not the most repugnant.&#160; It&#8217;s the type of McCarthyite act which would, if we had any minimal standards in our political culture, result in the shunning of Cheney and Kristol by all decent people&#160;(instead, it will likely land the&#160;Vice&#160;President&#8217;s daughter on multiple Sunday talk shows where she can pose as an expert on national security).&#160;&#160;The ad brands Eric&#160;Holder&#8217;s DOJ&#160;the &#8220;Department of Jihad&#8221;&#160;because it employs 9 lawyers who previously represented Guantanamo detainees&#160;(including Deputy Solicitor General Neal Katyal, who successfully represented the Guantanamo-plaintiffs in the 2006 <em>Hamdan</em> case before the U.S. Supreme Court).&#160; The ad darkly asks of these lawyers: &#8220;whose values do they share?,&#8221; and labels 7 of those unidentified DOJ&#160;lawyers &#8220;The Al Qaeda 7.&#8221; &#160;The premise of the ad is as clear as it insidious:&#160; any lawyers representing <strong>accused</strong> Terrorists are of suspect loyalties and allegiances, are devoted to &#8220;jihad,&#8221;&#160;and are sympathetic to, if not part of, Al Qaeda&#160;(this profoundly ugly smear campaign began with the <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/11/23/courts/index.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+salon%2Fgreenwald+%28Glenn+Greenwald%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader">always-unhinged</a> Andrew McCarthy in <em>National Review</em>, <a href="http://article.nationalreview.com/print/?q=MzU5NGI4MzNkZTg3MzY5MWQ0ZGQ0ZWJjNGExZDhjOGM=">who branded</a> such lawyers &#8220;terrorist sympathizers&#8221;).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/03/hafetz_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/03/hafetz_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>296</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.salon.com/2010/03/Hafetz_normalized.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A new low for the Cheneys and their friends</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/16/cheney_attacks_again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/16/cheney_attacks_again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 04:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liz Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh//politics/2010/02/15/cheney_attacks_again</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>An extraordinary array of Republicans have been bashing the administration for "Mirandizing" Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab over the last few days -- including Lindsey Graham, Kit Bond, Rudy Giuliani, Mitch McConnell and Michele Bachmann, to name a few -- even as the media admirably did its job reporting that the Bush administration had Mirandized every single terror suspect caught on its watch as well. Despite those facts, <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/ThisWeek/week-transcript-vice-president-dick-cheney/story?id=9818034">former Vice President Dick Cheney stepped up the attack</a> on Obama Sunday on ABC's "This Week" -- and also admitted he's a war criminal (but more on that later.)</p><p>Meanwhile, U.S. forces captured the most powerful Taliban leader they've grabbed since the war began in 2001, and intelligence sources tell Newsweek they've broken up a big al-Qaida plot in Yemen and Pakistan as well. More on that later too.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/02/16/cheney_attacks_again/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/02/16/cheney_attacks_again/">http://www.salon.com/2010/02/16/cheney_attacks_again/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/02/16/cheney_attacks_again/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/16/cheney_attacks_again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>124</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cheney family values</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/11/liz_cheney_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/11/liz_cheney_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liz Cheney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joe_conason//2010/01/11/liz_cheney</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>On paper at least, Liz Cheney is more than just the privileged daughter of a former vice-president, bristling with hostile remarks about the Obama administration, the president&#8217;s <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200909300001">patriotism</a>, and all the terrible perils we face because her father is no longer in control of our national defenses. She <a href="http://www.keepamericasafe.com/?page_id=215">advertises herself</a> as a &#8220;specialist in Mideast policy,&#8221; a term that implies some vague expertise in counterterrorism. What she usually delivers are crude, propagandistic pronouncements like <a href="http://www.keepamericasafe.com/">this cheesy attack ad</a>, titled "100 Hours."&#160;Reinforced by lurid music and graphics, its chief message is that President Obama played a few rounds of golf over the Christmas holiday -- and spent a few days finding out what happened with Flight 253 before commenting publicly on the incident.</p><p>Serving as a board member of Keep America Safe, the neoconservative propaganda organ responsible for that ad, Cheney is also a Fox News commentator and a regular guest on many other outlets. In those roles she has usually escaped tough questions, but there are some signs of weariness with her vacuous bluster.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/11/liz_cheney_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/11/liz_cheney_2/">http://www.salon.com/2010/01/11/liz_cheney_2/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/11/liz_cheney_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/11/liz_cheney_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Cheney administration in exile</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/13/america_safe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/13/america_safe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liz Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neoconservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture Investigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/10/13/america_safe</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>After an administration ends and the other party takes over, key members often find an institutional home from which to continue their arguments. In 2003, for example, veterans of the Clinton administration <a href="http://www.thenation.com/doc/20040301/dreyfuss">founded</a> the Center for American Progress, to provide research and talking-points for center-left policies.</p><p>Following this basic model, Liz Cheney -- daughter of the former vice president and a former State Department official herself -- has <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1009/28212.html">gathered</a> a group of conservatives of a particular ilk into a group she&#8217;s calling &#8220;Keep America Safe.&#8221; However, it&#8217;s not exactly a Bush administration in exile. Considering some of the people involved -- Weekly Standard editor Bill Kristol, blogger Michael Goldfarb and Cheney herself -- it might be more appropriate to call it a Cheney administration in exile.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/10/13/america_safe/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/10/13/america_safe/">http://www.salon.com/2009/10/13/america_safe/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/10/13/america_safe/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/13/america_safe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liz Cheney: U.S. needs commander, not community organizer</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/03/cheney_32/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/03/cheney_32/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 17:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liz Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/08/03/cheney</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Red State, a big conservative blog on the model of Daily Kos, had its first big bloggers' gathering this past weekend. They even had some fairly big names in the world of Republican politics come speak -- Texas Gov. Rick Perry, Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., and Rep. Roy Blunt, R-Mo., among others -- but they needed a headliner, someone whose name alone would be a draw.</p><p>So while Liz Cheney might not be her famous father, she does share a last name with the former vice-president, and that was apparently enough to make her the surprise guest at the event. That, and perhaps the political benefits for her? She's suggested in the past that she might run for elected office one day soon, and as Politico's Jonathan Martin <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0809/L_Cheney_goes_after_Obama_on_foreign_policy.html">observes</a>, while there, she certainly sounded like a candidate, at least in her attacks on President Obama's foreign policy.</p><p>Obama has a desire "to placate, to appease, not to cause offense," <a href="http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/08/03/liz-cheney-takes-on-barack-obamas-foreign-policy/">Cheney said.</a> "And it&#8217;s this desire that drives the president to plead with our enemies to talk at all costs. It puts America in a position of weakness, one that will not and cannot secure American interests.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/08/03/cheney_32/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/08/03/cheney_32/">http://www.salon.com/2009/08/03/cheney_32/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/08/03/cheney_32/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/03/cheney_32/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liz Cheney: &#8220;My dad would rather be fishing in Wyoming&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/12/liz_cheney/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/12/liz_cheney/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 15:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liz Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/05/12/liz_cheney</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Liz Cheney, the daughter of the former vice president and a Bush administration official herself, was on MSNBC's "Morning Joe"&#160;Tuesday morning for what turned into an interesting discussion on her father's recent foray into the spotlight and on torture.</p><p>In a debate with the Washington Post's Eugene Robinson, who in his most recent column suggested that her father is a "crazy old coot," Cheney said she thinks her father would "probably rather be fishing in Wyoming, given his druthers"&#160; but, throughout her appearance, said that he's speaking out because he genuinely believes the Obama administration's policies have put the country at increased risk.</p><p>She did take Robinson's criticism in good humor, however. Though she said there wasn't a moment when she was a teenager when she agreed with Robinson's description of her father, she did tell stories of the times she crashed his car growing up, which allowed for a little levity in what was otherwise a pretty serious debate.</p><p><div>
    <iframe frameborder="0" height="339" scrolling="no" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/30698227#30698227" width="425"></iframe>
  </div></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/05/12/liz_cheney/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/05/12/liz_cheney/">http://www.salon.com/2009/05/12/liz_cheney/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/05/12/liz_cheney/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/12/liz_cheney/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The press&#8217;s warped priorities</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/02/16/perry_security/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/02/16/perry_security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liz Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joe_conason//2007/02/16/perry_security</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Did you hear that Dick Cheney's lesbian daughter is having a baby? Of course you did -- and so did everyone else -- because over the past two months, the <a target="new" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/06/AR2006120600221.html">controversial pregnancy</a> of <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/mary_cheney/index.html">Mary Cheney</a> has been noted and debated on every almost every significant news outlet in America. </p><p>When Wolf Blitzer opened up that touchy topic during an interview on <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/cnn/index.html">CNN,</a> the <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/dick_cheney/index.html">vice president</a> responded with his trademark snarl. Mary Cheney seems to resent questions about her personal life, too, except when she is <a target="new" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/07/AR2006050700998.html">promoting her book</a> or marketing Coors beer. </p><p>Embarrassing as the contradictions between his gay daughter and his <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/homophobia/index.html">homophobic</a> party may be, however, the vice president should be grateful that the mainstream media hasn't turned the spotlight on his son-in-law. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/02/16/perry_security/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/02/16/perry_security/">http://www.salon.com/2007/02/16/perry_security/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/02/16/perry_security/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/02/16/perry_security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Emerald City exposed</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/09/14/iraq_184/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/09/14/iraq_184/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liz Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osama Bin Laden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bernard Kerik]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//blumenthal/2006/09/14/iraq</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>On the fifth anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks, President Bush delivered the culmination of yet another series of speeches on Iraq and the war on terror. For more than a year, he has periodically given speeches on military bases and before specially invited audiences who applauded his carefully crafted phrases, slightly altered on each occasion, as though these scenes represented widespread public support for his policies. But this Sept. 11 was different from the other anniversaries, partly because of the passage of half a decade but mostly because of what Bush has done with the years. </p><p>Bush hoped with his <a href="/opinion/feature/2006/09/12/bush_speech/index.html">latest speech</a> to reanimate his early iconic stature in the week after the terrorist attacks, when the whole country and world were unified in sympathy. Even "evil" Syria and Iran offered assistance in tracking down al-Qaida. Bush prompted us that "the wounds of that morning are still fresh." His evocation of emotion was an attempt to filter memory. We were guided to remember the trauma as the primal experience for sustaining Bush's politics. By touching the source of pain he tried to redirect it into an affirmation of every twist and turn he has taken since the fateful day. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/09/14/iraq_184/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/09/14/iraq_184/">http://www.salon.com/2006/09/14/iraq_184/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/09/14/iraq_184/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/09/14/iraq_184/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

