<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > local</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/local/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:22:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Local food isn&#8217;t bad</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/08/local_food_isnt_bad_salpart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/08/local_food_isnt_bad_salpart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2012 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12952489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A critique proves that models used in neoliberal economics do not accurately apply to food and agriculture]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A physicist, a chemist and an economist are stranded on an island, with nothing to eat. A can of soup washes ashore. The physicist says, “Let's smash the can open with a rock.” The chemist says, “Let's build a fire and heat the can first.” The economist says, “Let's assume that we have a can-opener...”</p><p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a></p><p>Economists all know this joke, which “comes from the stereotype that many economic models require unrealistic or absurd assumptions in order to obtain results.” And yet, how many heed its warning?</p><p>A new book, "The Locavore's Dilemma: In Praise of the 10,000 Mile Diet" by Pierre Desroches and Hiroku Shimizu, uses arguments from neoliberal economics to explain why those who advocate eating local food are wrong. Often, their arguments require assumptions as silly as the one in the joke. For example, in making the case that the world moved from a diet of local food to a global food system for a good reason (and therefore we should not return to eating local), they assume that modern locavores will face the same technological limitations as our ancestors, who were also locavores. But aside from the numerous strawman arguments found throughout the book, there are several points where economics are properly applied to food and agriculture and – the authors charge – prove that local food is a bad idea.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/07/08/local_food_isnt_bad_salpart/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/08/local_food_isnt_bad_salpart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Web for the neighborhood</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/04/making_the_internet_real_salpart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/04/making_the_internet_real_salpart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 14:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Next American City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urbanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12950144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new tool is a sounding board for building better communities]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Candy Chang moved to New Orleans in 2010. A small, intense woman, her background was in architecture and design. She had been living in Finland, but like scores of idealistic twentysomethings, she found herself drawn to the Crescent City. She was lured by the notion of becoming part of the burgeoning recovery that was changing whole neighborhoods in ways nobody ever predicted before Hurricane Katrina turned reality on its head. As an artist, she saw a canvas.</p><p><a href="http://www.americancity.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/NAC.jpg" alt="Next American City" align="left" /></a>New Orleans was changing fast in 2010. The city was still reeling from the storm — many citizens had either decided they were never going to return, or realized they would never be able to. Those that had made their way back, or coming for the first time, were carving away rot as quickly as they could. Others were settling comfortably into it. The Marigny and adjacent Bywater neighborhood — about two miles downriver from the already-restored French Quarter — radiated emptiness and energy in the span of a single block. It was a shell, and the future was up for grabs.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/07/04/making_the_internet_real_salpart/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/04/making_the_internet_real_salpart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
