<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Los Angeles Times</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/los_angeles_times/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 01:58:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Koch Brothers eyeing Tribune company</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/21/koch_brothers_interested_in_tribune_company/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/21/koch_brothers_interested_in_tribune_company/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2013 18:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago Tribune]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Koch Brothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13277866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tribune owns the Los Angeles Times, the Chicago Tribune and several large regional newspapers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Word has <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/koch_brothers_consider_purchasing_la_times/">circulated</a> since at least March that the libertarian leaning, <a href="http://nymag.com/news/features/67285/">Tea Party backing</a> Koch brothers wanted to buy the Tribune Company, the struggling newspaper outfit that owns the Los Angeles Times, the Chicago Tribune and several regional papers. The New York Times reports today that gaining influence in the media is part of the brothers "three-pronged, 10-year strategy to shift the country toward a smaller government with less regulation and taxes." The other two prongs are "educating grass-roots activists and influencing politics."</p><p>The Times reports:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/21/koch_brothers_interested_in_tribune_company/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/21/koch_brothers_interested_in_tribune_company/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Koch brothers consider purchasing L.A. Times</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/koch_brothers_consider_purchasing_la_times/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/koch_brothers_consider_purchasing_la_times/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Koch Brothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13226703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The conservative donors are reportedly eyeing one of the country's top newspaper companies]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to "multiple sources" <a href="http://blogs.laweekly.com/informer/2013/03/will_koch_brothers_buy_la_times.php">who spoke with L.A. Weekly</a>, the conservative billionaire Koch brothers are considering buying the Tribune Co., which owns the Los Angeles Times, the Chicago Trubine and the Baltimore Sun, among other publications:</p><blockquote><p>Now, these are unverified rumors that should be taken with a grain of salt if not a whole dollop. The Tribune Co. won't comment on any specific offers they've received, although a source there says, "We've gotten a ton of interest. That was one of the reasons for hiring the outside financial advisors, to sift through the unsolicited interest." [...]</p> <p>Another rumor, passed along by a member of the L.A. Times Editorial Board, no less, has the Koch Brothers helping to finance a bid by "Papa Doug" Manchester, himself a right-wing multimillionaire who in 2009 bought the San Diego Union Tribune and promptly turned it into a propaganda organ for San Diego development.</p></blockquote><p>Like many newspaper companies, Tribune Co. has faced hard times in recent years, complicated by the difficult reign of Sam Zell, who <a href="http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2013-01-13/business/ct-biz-trib-series-1-20130113_1_sam-zell-randy-michaels-big-gamble">took the company into bankruptcy</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/koch_brothers_consider_purchasing_la_times/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/koch_brothers_consider_purchasing_la_times/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Invest in readers, not MFAs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/invest_in_readers_not_mfas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/invest_in_readers_not_mfas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 20:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers and Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MFA programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philanthropy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sam Zell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tribune company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literary world]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13223185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A $50 million donation to creative writing programs is a misplaced effort to foster literary culture]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Supply and demand -- those are concepts you'd expect a mogul to understand almost instinctively, so what to make of the recent donation by the Zell Family Foundation (set up by financier Sam Zell and his wife, Helen) of $50 million to the creative writing program at the University of Michigan? Helen Zell told the Associated Press, "The ability of fiction to develop creativity, to analyze the human psyche, help you understand people — it's critical. It's as important as vitamins or anything else. To me, it's the core of the intellectual health of human beings."</p><p>Of course, creative writing programs are not a bad thing, but their role in our current culture can make even those who work within them uneasy. The programs provide promising young writers with the opportunity to concentrate on their work in an (ideally) supportive community of writers. But the programs have difficulty imparting to their students a central truth of most authors' lives: Nobody cares about your work. When it comes to books, the supply is much larger than the demand.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/invest_in_readers_not_mfas/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/invest_in_readers_not_mfas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. polluting water it may someday drink</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/28/u_s_polluting_water_it_may_someday_drink/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/28/u_s_polluting_water_it_may_someday_drink/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 21:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ProPublica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aquifer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denver]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13184367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regulators have long deemed deep aquifers too expensive to tap, but what happens if traditional reservoirs dry up?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.propublica.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/12/Logo-e1354323738840.jpg" alt="ProPublica" align="left" /></a> Mexico City plans to draw drinking water from a mile-deep aquifer, according to <a href="http://touch.latimes.com/#section/-1/article/p2p-74114584/">a report in the Los Angeles Times</a>. The Mexican effort challenges a key tenet of U.S. clean water policy: that water far underground can be intentionally polluted because it will never be used.</p><p>U.S. environmental regulators have long assumed that reservoirs located thousands of feet underground will be too expensive to tap. So even as population increases, temperatures rise, and traditional water supplies dry up, American scientists and policy-makers often exempt these deep aquifers from clean water protections and allow energy and mining companies to inject pollutants directly into them.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/28/u_s_polluting_water_it_may_someday_drink/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/28/u_s_polluting_water_it_may_someday_drink/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s endless fundraising</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/19/obamas_endless_fundraising/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/19/obamas_endless_fundraising/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 00:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BillMoyers.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inauguration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Golden Globes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13176296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The election may be over, but the glad-handing continues. So much for the president's pledge to keep donors at bay]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you’re one of those who equate the worlds of Washington and Hollywood — the standard joke: “Politics is show business for ugly people” — then a presidential inauguration is the Oscars, Golden Globes and Emmy Awards combined, right down to the parties, balls, extravagant wardrobes and goody bags stuffed with swag. Just check out the online “<a href="https://store.2013pic.org/">57th Presidential Inauguration Store</a>," which is peddling more tchotchkes than the vendors outside a Justin Bieber concert — from shot glasses, T-shirts and tube socks to an Obama portrait by the artist Chuck Close and a $7,500 set of official medallions.</p><p>The company behind this marketing behemoth — as it was during the 2012 campaign, when at times it appeared the Obama team was running a big-box store rather than a presidential race — is Financial Innovations, Inc., which also happens to be one of a handful of corporations donating money to underwrite this year’s inaugural celebration. Its owner, Democratic fundraiser Mark Weiner, was an Obama bundler, raising as much as half a million dollars for the president’s reelection. <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-inaugural-committee-donor-20130108,0,5621307.story">According to Matea Gold</a> at the Los Angeles Times, analyzing data from the Federal Election Commission, Financial Innovations “was paid more than $15.7 million by two Obama campaign committees to produce and mail campaign merchandise.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/19/obamas_endless_fundraising/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/19/obamas_endless_fundraising/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Latino gang member convicted for role in racist terror campaign</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/latino_gang_member_convicted_for_role_in_racist_terror_campaign/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/latino_gang_member_convicted_for_role_in_racist_terror_campaign/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 19:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern Poverty Law Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latino Gangs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gang violence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13173182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Santiago "Chico" Rios and his son, Louie "Lil Chico" Rios, targeted African Americans across Los Angeles County]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.splcenter.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/splc_180.jpeg" alt="The Southern Poverty Law Center" align="left" /></a> A Latino street gang leader and his son were sentenced in federal court Monday to lengthy prison terms for their role in a years-long campaign of racist terror and ethnic cleansing targeting African Americans in and around Los Angeles.</p><p>Since at least the mid-1990s, Latino street gangs across Los Angeles County have been targeting, beating and sometimes killing blacks in an attempt to drive them out of the region.</p><p>Just before Christmas 2006, <a href="http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-report/browse-all-issues/2007/spring/race-based-gangs">Cheryl Green, 14, playing on her skateboard</a> with a group of friends just south of 206<sup>th</sup> Street in Los Angeles, was shot dead in broad daylight by two men who approached the group and opened fire without saying a word. Two members of the 204<sup>th</sup> Street gang were later arrested in the killing.</p><p>Green’s death shook the city.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/latino_gang_member_convicted_for_role_in_racist_terror_campaign/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/latino_gang_member_convicted_for_role_in_racist_terror_campaign/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An FCC Christmas gift for Rupert Murdoch?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/an_fcc_christmas_gift_for_rupert_murdoch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/an_fcc_christmas_gift_for_rupert_murdoch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 21:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BillMoyers.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago Tribune]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13116225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New rules could pave the way for the News Corp. mogul to purchase the Chicago Tribune and the Los Angeles Times]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Until now, this hasn’t been the best year for media mogul Rupert Murdoch. For one, none of the Republicans who had been on the payroll of his Fox News Channel – not Newt Gingrich or Rick Santorum or Mike Huckabee or Sarah Palin – became this year’s GOP nominee for president.</p><p>Oh sure, when Mitt Romney got the nod instead, Murdoch’s TV and newspaper empire backed him big time, but on election night, Fox pundits like Dick Morris and Karl Rove – the top GOP strategist and fundraiser -- had to eat crow as Barack Obama won a second term in the White House, despite their predictions of a Republican landslide. (When the network called Ohio and the election for Obama, a desperate Rove tried to keep Fox statisticians from doing their job until the facts couldn’t be ignored or denied. New York magazine reports that Fox News programming chief Bill Shine now “has sent out orders mandating that producers must get permission before booking Rove or Morris.”)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/an_fcc_christmas_gift_for_rupert_murdoch/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/an_fcc_christmas_gift_for_rupert_murdoch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dark money obscures Congress</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/dark_money_obscures_congress/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/dark_money_obscures_congress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 19:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Next New Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super PACs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13104024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forget the national elections. Two thirds of winning House incumbents outspent their opponents by a factor of nine]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nextnewdeal.net/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/05/next-new-deal-logo.png" alt="Next New Deal" align="left" /></a> It's been tempting to treat the 2012 election as proof that money in politics doesn't matter as much as commonly believed, or that <a href="http://www.nextnewdeal.net/citizens-united-0"><em>Citizens United </em></a>and the emergence of <a href="http://www.nextnewdeal.net/super-pac">Super PACs</a> and political non-profits didn't change things as much as predicted. “Effect of 'super PACs' proved to be less than expected,” the <em>Los Angeles Times</em> <a href="http://articles.latimes.com/2012/nov/08/nation/la-na-outside-money-20121108">declared</a> in a post-election headline.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/dark_money_obscures_congress/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/dark_money_obscures_congress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
