Love and Sex
Star 69
Many Unhappy Returns
i’m noticing a disturbing trend in the mating and dating life. It’s this new service available from your local telephone company called Call Return, or as it’s more commonly known, Star 69.
It’s simple. If you miss a call, and your machine isn’t on or you don’t have a machine, you just press *69, and the phone rings right back to the person who last called you. Whether they have left a message or not.
This service has disturbing implications. Say you just called Belle, a person with whom you are mildly, very mildly entranced. Say you got her machine, and you just weren’t yet committed to taking the plunge by leaving a message. Or your roommate walked into the room, just as her “Hi, This is Belle and I’m not here –” began. You hang up. Suddenly the phone rings before you’ve even let go of the handset. “Hi, who’s this?” Belle asks. “You just called me. Why did you call me?”
This little invention was clearly intended for one purpose only: to wreak emotional havoc on the furtive, to out the chickens. Unless you are a cave person, of course you have a machine or voice mail. So it’s rather disingenuous of the phone company to pretend this is a service for the technologically impaired.
Not surprisingly, Star 69 has now entered the lexicon of relationships, attaining the much-sought-after status of a verb. “I was Star Sixty-Nined once,” said Isobel. “I’d gotten the wrong number, and just hung up. Then there’s this woman saying in my ear, ‘why are you calling and hanging up on my machine?’ “
Some of my friends have confessed to a Star 69 addiction. They come home, see the steady light of their answering machine, and dial Star 69 to see which chump didn’t leave a message. There’s always the possibility that they in turn will get a machine, in which case they must mull over the next step: do they leave a message asking why a message wasn’t left, or do they hang up and open up the possibility of getting Star 69′ed themselves? Conceivably, this could be a very time-consuming addiction.
For some, however, Star 69 may serve as a valuable screening mechanism. Consider Dave’s story. Cousin Cheryl from out of town is sleeping on the sofa. The phone rings one early Sunday morning. She answers from a deep sleep, and the caller hangs up. Dave Star 69′s the offender, and gets a woman whom he’d dated a few times. “Did you just call me?” Dave asks politely. “I’m just trying out this new service from the phone company.” The woman nervously says no, then retracts her lie. They have an embarrassed conversation, in which she apologizes for hanging up and for lying.
“Thank God for Star 69,” says Dave. “Now I don’t have to waste my time and money with the kind of woman who would lie and hang up on my cousin. The best 75 cents I’ve ever spent.”
I was curious how the phone company came up with such a, well, appropriate number for their service. “It was just the next number in the series,” said Barbara, a Pacific Bell service representative. “You know, we have Star 70, Star 68… all of them are dialing codes for our customers. The Call Return just happened to fall on 69. It wasn’t intentional.”
I’m not sure I buy that. Any company capable of thinking up something as diabolical as Star 69 is certainly capable of giving it a name that sounds like a bad porno movie.
The Filler Problem
How can you tell when a relationship is filler?
Isobel went to Max’s house early one evening. They’d met each other a month ago, a fix-up conspired by Isobel’s hair colorist and Max’s roommate. After each date, I’d get a thorough report from her, and I could see from the outset that her heart just wasn’t in it. It was clear to me that Max was what we call in the dating world, filler.
Isobel, a sous chef, was between relationships, just like the way people can be between jobs. You take that job selling hot dogs at a corner cart because you can’t land a catering gig. It’s still in your field — hot dogs, making hors d’oeuvres, it’s all food, right? You’re bored, you’re anxious, and you need to pay the rent. Max was Isobel’s hot dog.
Continue Reading CloseSleeping With The Enemy
Are disparate political views anathema to a relationship?
he was a great guy. Smart, funny, witty. Tall. Well-educated. He was also cynical, which should have been a tip-off, but Sarah was starry-eyed.
They’d met at a bookstore on the Upper West Side, attending a reading of one of those Clinton exposé books. “I can’t remember which one it was,” said Sarah, who works for the Sierra Club. “It wasn’t ‘Bloodsport.’ I think it was a Hillary-bashing book.” She was annoyed when she saw a man’s arm shoot up just seconds after the author had finished reading, but his question was admittedly pointed, and, well, interesting.
Continue Reading CloseI might like you better if we slept together. But then again…
What can destroy a friendship faster than anything else? Sex. What can bring two friends closer than anything else? Sex.
what can destroy a friendship faster than anything else? Sex.
What can bring two friends closer than anything else? Sex.
At some point in your friendship, the two of you must have gone over this ground. It was probably at the beginning, the sniffing stage, when somehow one or both of you came to the implicit conclusion that friendship — and not coupledom — was the way to go. Perhaps there were other, more pressing commitments: a spouse, a lover, a demanding job, a vow of celibacy.
Continue Reading CloseSex And The City
Christine Muhlke reviews Candace Bushnell's book "Sex And The City".
The media celebrities! The heartbreak! The strappy sandals! This bumptious collection of Candace Bushnell’s “Sex and the City” columns from The New York Observer provides a prime banquette seat to witness the intense and rather frightening mating rituals of the attractive, successful, over-35-and-still-unmarried set.
Those who follow Bushnell’s column will be familiar with much of the material here; indeed, a fair portion of the chapters have run in The Observer in the last six months. Placed between hard covers, however, this so-called sex column takes on a different tone — it becomes a kind of serial novel that works as both a comedy of manners and a class study of the current Age of Non-Innocence.
Continue Reading CloseChristine Muhlke is the managing editor of Paper magazine. More Christine Muhlke.
Russian Roulette
Do you always practice safe sex? Or has the fear of AIDS --among other STDs -- diminished?
wind was whipping up the street, and Isobel shivered in her leather jacket. We were sitting at our outside table in the Russian Hill cafe, surrounded by the usual suspects: no-visible-source-of-income bohemes with a light sprinkling of yuppies for good measure.
“I love San Francisco summers,” Isobel said cheerfully, peeling off a sheet of newspaper that had blown up and attached itself to her leg. “The furnace broke down last night, and I was so cold that I called Mel and he stayed over.”
Continue Reading ClosePage 1166 of 1169 in Love and Sex