<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Mad Men</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/mad_men/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 01:14:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why is Twitter so awful on Sundays?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/why_is_twitter_so_awful_on_sundays/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/why_is_twitter_so_awful_on_sundays/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 14:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[True Blood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Game of Thrones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunday night TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13346886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweets about Sunday TV have taken on their own form of humor -- fun if you're watching, obnoxious if you're not]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blocking someone on Twitter, ensuring you’ll never see their tweets, is the nuclear option -- better reserved for trollish, harassing enemies online who won’t stop making fun of your avatar than for amiable-seeming supporting players on a TV sitcom. <span style="font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;">And yet recently I found myself blocking </span><a style="font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;" href="http://twitter.com/unforettable">Retta</a>, who exhorts her co-workers to “Treat yo’self!” on “Parks and Recreation” and whose observations on TV as it happens (or, sometimes, as she's catching up later) garner retweets from many people I follow.</p><p>It wasn’t her -- it was me. I’d grown tired of a new manner of speaking on Twitter of which Retta was merely a popular example. Particularly when talking about an episode of Sunday television, it seemed, everyone I followed on Twitter spoke in a language that I just couldn’t get into; a patois of oblique references (so as to prevent spoilers) and gleeful, headlong description of whatever was happening in front of them. If you weren’t watching live, as I generally was not, you were missing all the fun, not merely because you didn’t get the reference, but because the reference was the entire substance of a sort of half-joke.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/why_is_twitter_so_awful_on_sundays/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/why_is_twitter_so_awful_on_sundays/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What &#8220;Veep&#8221; got right about our government</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/what_veep_got_right_about_our_government/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/what_veep_got_right_about_our_government/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 16:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Veep]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breaking Bad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vice president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aaron Sorkin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the west wing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Ides of March]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julia Louis-Dreyfus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13338801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It obliterates mainstream myths by showing the government isn't full of geniuses -- and the public isn't all morons]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After two full seasons of "Veep," it should be clear that Armando Ianucci's HBO satire is the most accurately scripted show ever made about American politics -- full stop. There is no need to qualify or massage that statement; it's just flat-out true, even though I'm guessing many people who work in politics despise it.</p><p>The reason that's my guess is because unlike other movies and TV shows about politics, "Veep" -- whose season finale just aired -- portrays politicians, staffers, lobbyists and reporters not as the heroic idealists and brilliant Machiavellis that politicos desperately want to see looking back at them from the mirror. Instead, "Veep" shows Washington for what it is: not merely Hollywood for trolls, but a place where painfully average and often untalented drones follow their star-fucking ambitions only to be caught in a soul-sapping system that devours whatever last remaining shreds of humanity they still possessed.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/what_veep_got_right_about_our_government/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/what_veep_got_right_about_our_government/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>15 predictions for Mad Men&#8217;s final act</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/fifteen_predictions_for_mad_mens_final_act/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/fifteen_predictions_for_mad_mens_final_act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 15:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mad men season 6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mad men season 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[don draper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13336292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you're in withdrawal from season six, it's time to start thinking about how season seven will end (or should)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After all the speculation about "Mad Men," two deaths marked the end of season 6. The first was an example of pure Weinerian  irony: Pete’s mother fell (or was pushed) from the SS Sunset Princess into shark-infested waters. But Weiner also apparently knows his Aristotle — we begin in comedy and end in tragedy — and  we know that Weiner enjoys doubles: the main death here came in the second half of the show and was that of Don Draper's carefully constructed persona. Who is (or was) Don Draper? He’s Dick Whitman, and this season’s dark night of the soul ended in a most Jungian way with his confession and his journey to his childhood home, a house of prostitution.</p><p>Of course, each season finale has been like a little death for viewers, and discussions have already begun about the seventh season. Will Dick/Don redeem himself or least move on from the Inferno to Purgatorio? Will the company and show go bicoastal? Will Peggy ever make a wise dating choice? Here are some possibilities:</p><p>1. It’s 2014. A late-middle-aged Sally, played by Susan Sarandon, stands in the doorway of what is obviously a home office. The camera pans the room, ending with a manuscript on the desk. The cover says "Mad Men: A Memoir," by Sally Draper Bishop.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/fifteen_predictions_for_mad_mens_final_act/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/fifteen_predictions_for_mad_mens_final_act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Mad Men&#8217;s&#8221; only real man?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/mad_mens_only_real_man_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/mad_mens_only_real_man_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 20:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Weeklings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[don draper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sally Draper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pete campbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ken Cosgrove]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13335697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don Draper? Sad manchild. Roger Sterling? Clownish boy. Teenage Glen may be the lone male character above reproach ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.theweeklings.com"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/11/weeklings_new_small.png" alt="The Weeklings" /></a> WE’VE ALL BEEN THERE. Well, maybe not all. But if you’re a girl, or were a girl, you’ve been where Sally was at her overnight at Miss Porter’s. Left alone with some guy who you are willing to make small talk with…but then it soon becomes clear that it’s going to turn into his mouth on your mouth. And you give a signal– a polite signal – you lean away, attempt to make small talk – “What music do you like?” But he keeps going and you are going to have to get up and say no. And then you’re called a name: you’re a tease – “C’mon, you called us up here.”</p><p>We’ve all been where Sally was on “The Quality of Mercy,” last week’s episode of <em>Mad Men</em>, but not all of us have Glen. When she jumps up and yells for him to help her from the other room, where he’s gone with the pretty blonde, we’re thinking, or I was thinking, “He’s hooking up, he’s going to be pissed, he’s not going to come through.” Or: he’s going to want Sally – that’s what’s going to happen – she’s going to have to repay him. But what does Glen show us? That’s he’s the only virtuous man – the only non-man child – on the show. And possibly on the earth.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/mad_mens_only_real_man_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/mad_mens_only_real_man_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will the truth set Don Draper free?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/will_the_truth_set_don_draper_free/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/will_the_truth_set_don_draper_free/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 11:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mad men finale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[don draper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13335155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a season full of lies, the "Mad Men" finale reveals our cultural aversion to honesty]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Mad Men" is a parable of the constraints of modern life at the height of America's cultural supremacy. Over the course of six seasons, Don Draper and his associates have demonstrated how we, as a country, became better and better at selling a full-color fantasy of the good life to ourselves and to the rest of the world. But in the process, we slowly poisoned our own culture with skin-deep lies about what it takes to be happy. In the workplace and at home, we demanded that our stories look more and more like the idealized stories on TV and the pretty advertisements in our magazines, pumping up our expectations, and intensifying our disappointment in ourselves and those around us. Decades later, dissatisfaction is such an essential aspect of our cultural groundwater that pointing it out either feels hopelessly earnest or downright paranoid. We have become so good at telling pretty stories that we've brainwashed ourselves in the process. Our leaders are those who look the best on TV, who mouth the syrupy jingles that dovetail with the lies we're already telling ourselves, and who cover up their lies with more lies the most efficiently.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/will_the_truth_set_don_draper_free/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/will_the_truth_set_don_draper_free/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The suprisingly hopeful &#8220;Mad Men&#8221; finale</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/the_suprisingly_hopeful_mad_men_finale/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/the_suprisingly_hopeful_mad_men_finale/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 03:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mad men finale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13334945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After spending all season repeating himself, Don Draper finally makes a change]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This season of “Mad Men” made 1968 palpable. It filled viewers with a tremendous sense of uneasy mood, made us paranoid, encouraged us to expect the worst,<em></em> and, most of all, had us awaiting some climactic, horrifying event — that never arrived, or at least not in the form we expected. 1968 was a year of extraordinary upheaval, but sitting here, more than four decades removed, we know what the people living through it could not: The revolution did not arrive. The center held. The chaos was, ultimately, bound. Sally Draper will be 26 years old in 1980: she is more likely to be a yuppie than a radical — though maybe a feminist too. Change comes, fast and fierce, but not fast or fierce enough to wash everything away. Not fast or fierce enough to wash away a man's past. When the huge, show-changing event the season had been leading up to finally arrived, it was all psychological, not physical. It was not menacing, it was promising. The heavy weight hanging over this season was not 1968, it was Don Draper, and now he's free — or freer than we've ever seen him.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/the_suprisingly_hopeful_mad_men_finale/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/the_suprisingly_hopeful_mad_men_finale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On &#8220;Mad Men,&#8221; Don Draper assumes the fetal position</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/on_mad_men_don_draper_assumes_the_fetal_position/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/on_mad_men_don_draper_assumes_the_fetal_position/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 14:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[don draper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13328667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The season's penultimate episode finds him lying to everyone, and curling up like a baby]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the second-to-last episode of the season, it looks like we've finally landed in the eighth circle of hell, Fraud. Don starts the episode curled up in the fetal position on Sally's bed, clearly undone by Sally's discovery of his affair with Sylvia Rosen ("You make me sick!" Sally says), and ends the episode in the fetal position after Peggy confronts him ("You're a monster!" Peggy says). In between, every action Don takes is fraudulent: He pours booze into his orange juice and hides the bottle from Megan, he lies to Betty about drinking and about missing Sally (when he's visibly relieved that she's not coming for the weekend), he lies to Megan about not being interested in Peggy and Ted's relationship, he calls Harry back and presumably reverses his edict on Sunkist (thereby double-crossing Ted), he lies to Jim and Ted and agrees there'll be "no more surprises," and then he surprises Ted by lying to St. Joseph's about their ad being Frank Gleason's idea. Finally, when Peggy confronts him, he lies and tells her he's just looking out for the agency.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/on_mad_men_don_draper_assumes_the_fetal_position/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/on_mad_men_don_draper_assumes_the_fetal_position/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Mad Men&#8221; recap: Steamy relationships, real and imagined</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/mad_men_recap_steamy_relationships_real_and_imagined/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/mad_men_recap_steamy_relationships_real_and_imagined/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 13:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mad men recap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[don draper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bob benson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peggy olson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vincent kartheiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pete campbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13321792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pete steals the show, a character is craftily outed, and finally -- finally! -- we feel a little sympathy for Don]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every time this season of "Mad Men" starts to feel like a disappointment, we get another fantastic episode that reminds us why this show is incomparably smart and engrossing. "Favors" offered up one satisfying scene after another – which is particularly impressive because the episode mostly concerned imaginary relationships: Between Pete's mom and Manolo, Sally and Mitchell, Ted and Peggy, Ted and Don, Don and Arnold, Sylvia and Don, Bob Benson and Pete (Whoa! Who saw that coming? Not me!).</p><p>The favors (literal and figurative) were flying, of course, with too many satisfying scenes to count: Three-way flirting between Peggy, Pete and Ted? Mrs. Campbell telling Peggy about her sex life? Don actually sticking his neck out for someone other than himself? Of course, whenever Don starts looking heroic, you know there's real trouble ahead. Still, any episode in which Peggy, Pete, Ted and Don all show us their vulnerable sides is a rare and beautiful thing indeed.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/mad_men_recap_steamy_relationships_real_and_imagined/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/mad_men_recap_steamy_relationships_real_and_imagined/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Mad Men&#8221; recap: Why don&#8217;t we care more about Don Draper?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/03/mad_men_recap_why_dont_we_care_more_about_don_draper/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/03/mad_men_recap_why_dont_we_care_more_about_don_draper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 13:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[don draper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roger sterling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joan holloway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sharon tate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[megan draper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13315703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[His stumbles approach "Sunset Boulevard" proportions -- but he's so enigmatic, he's becoming  less compelling]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We had a lot of fun with Don Draper in the old days. Remember? Remember how we could go to a hip bash and hit on hot chicks without worrying about hallucinating dead soldiers and winding up face down in the pool, "Sunset Boulevard"-style?</p><p>"The poor dope. He always wanted a pool." Those opening lines of "Sunset Boulevard" fit the spirit of the sixth season of "Mad Men" to a T. Delusions and vanities have been laid bare; shallow desires and hungry egos have taken a back seat to existential reckoning; the triumph of paternalism and capitalist grandiosity have been supplanted by an angry uprising.</p><p>But near-drowning aside, Don is less struggling screenwriter Joe Gillis than aging starlet Norma Desmond, gracelessly discovering that his best years have passed him by. First he watches the Democratic National Convention riots on TV, but only manages to demonstrate on the phone to Megan that he identifies with The Man more than with the hippies on the street. Like Peggy's comments about Avon's ad campaign, he is "unintentionally old-fashioned." "Can you imagine a policeman cracking your skull?" Megan asks, making it clear where her sympathies lie. "It would change your whole life." Why does that sound like foreshadowing? And speaking of which, the next thing she says to Don is, "Go for a swim. It always makes you feel better." Not always, Megan. Don, though, just tells Megan to go to sleep, see also: Power down that pretty little head of yours, just like I have, and you'll be less tormented by these awful times.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/03/mad_men_recap_why_dont_we_care_more_about_don_draper/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/03/mad_men_recap_why_dont_we_care_more_about_don_draper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Call me Don Draper: &#8220;Madman begets &#8216;Mad Men&#8217;&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/call_me_don_draper_madman_begets_mad_men/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/call_me_don_draper_madman_begets_mad_men/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 23:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[matthew weiner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moby dick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Ginsberg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13312942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Mad Men" is really a modern-day "Moby-Dick" -- you'll be amazed by the direct comparisons and allusions]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p dir="LTR">In a brief 2012 interview, "Mad Men" creator Matthew Weiner referred to incessant attempts by viewers and critics alike to pin down the main motifs of his successful series, as well as get a handle on its enigmatic main man, Don Draper. It would be best, Weiner suggested, if the viewing public abandon the struggle to find an outright interpretation of his work and focus instead on the kind of experience "Mad Men" provides -- the type of story it tells.</p><p dir="LTR">As an example of what that may mean, Weiner goes on to describe a scene in one of the opening chapters of Herman Melville's monumental "Moby-Dick," in which its narrator, Ishmael, stands facing an obscure painting hanging on the wall of the Spouter Inn, on his way to join the Pequod.</p><p dir="LTR">Following several failed attempts to make sense of the seemingly disparate parts of the painting – which, among others, includes what appears to be a stormy beach, mastheads and a whale – Ishmael settles. Arriving at what he calls "a final theory of my own," one "partly based upon the aggregated opinions of many aged persons with whom I conversed upon the subject," Melville's narrator describes the painting as representing</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/call_me_don_draper_madman_begets_mad_men/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/call_me_don_draper_madman_begets_mad_men/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Megan Draper suffer the same fate as Sharon Tate?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/will_megan_draper_suffer_the_same_fate_as_sharon_tate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/will_megan_draper_suffer_the_same_fate_as_sharon_tate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[megan draper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sharon tate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charles manson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13312240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An homage to the actress who was murdered by Charles Manson's followers prompts viewers to examine a possible link]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Internet is <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/madmen/comments/1f7e18/theory_megansharon_tate/">buzzing with rumors</a> that "Mad Men" character Megan Draper may be a symbol for "Valley of the Dolls" actress Sharon Tate, the late wife of director Roman Polanski who was brutally murdered by Charles Manson's followers when she was 8.5 months pregnant.</p><p>In Sunday's episode, Draper appeared wearing a white T-shirt with a red star and white panties while ominous sirens blared in the background. The look was identical to what Tate wore in a 1967 Esquire magazine photo shoot, above. A Twitter user claiming to be the daughter of the photographer shared the photo with "Mad Men" costume designer Janie Bryant, who <a href="https://twitter.com/JanieBryant/status/339055029753368576">confirmed</a> that Tate "inspired" the look.</p><p>Since then, theories tying Tate and Draper -- who, though not 8.5 months pregnant, has suffered a miscarriage -- have been popping up on <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/madmen/comments/1f7e18/theory_megansharon_tate/">Reddit</a> and elsewhere, speculating that the scene foreshadows Draper's death.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/will_megan_draper_suffer_the_same_fate_as_sharon_tate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/will_megan_draper_suffer_the_same_fate_as_sharon_tate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get rid of your cable TV package now!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/get_rid_of_your_cable_tv_package_now/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/get_rid_of_your_cable_tv_package_now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 19:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[msnbc_neg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cable News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cable television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Trade Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disaster Porn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13311978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was afraid, too. Then I cut the cord, saved a ton and can still watch whatever I want. Here's how to do it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those of you sick of paying <a href="http://mobile.nytimes.com/2013/05/02/business/media/comcast-posts-17-rise-in-net-income-despite-a-dip-in-revenue-at-nbcuniversal.html">ever-higher cable bills</a>, two huge pieces of news in the last week should encourage you to take action.</p><p>First came <a href="http://www.deadline.com/2013/05/tbs-tnt-to-offer-live-streaming-247/">news</a> that two previously cable-only channels, TBS and TNT, "are about to become the first national entertainment networks in the industry to stream on-air content live across multiple platforms," likely positioning the stations to eventually (though not yet) sell their content direct to consumers on an à la carte online basis, rather than only through traditional cable TV packages. Then yesterday came word that <a href="http://cnnpressroom.blogs.cnn.com/2013/05/28/buzzfeed-to-aggressively-expand-video-operation-in-partnership-with-youtube/">CNN and BuzzFeed</a> are partnering to create a YouTube channel, allowing anyone with an Internet connection -- but not necessarily a costly cable subscription -- to view the new content.</p><p>The action this (and other similar news in the television world) should prompt, of course, is cutting your cable TV cord -- or at least considering it.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/get_rid_of_your_cable_tv_package_now/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/get_rid_of_your_cable_tv_package_now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>128</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Mad Men&#8221; recap: Don and Betty, the dance continues</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/27/mad_men_recap_don_and_betty_together_again_sort_of/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/27/mad_men_recap_don_and_betty_together_again_sort_of/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 13:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mad men recap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[don draper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peggy olson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13310269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Two conventional beauty queens who never understood all the fuss about ideals and moral high ground"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, who saw that coming? One minute Don is weeping into his hands over Sylvia Rosen, the next minute he's following his ex-wife Betty into her hotel room for a little nostalgic sheet-twisting. All Betty had to do was drop the extra weight and go back to blonde, and Don was all over her like cold bologna on white bread. And he wasn't the only one: Stu, Henry, Mike the gas station attendant: They're all in awe of Betty in this episode, aptly titled "The Better Half." (And you just know January Jones breathed a giant sigh of relief when she finally got a script that didn't require the fat suit.)</p><p>It's funny how Don and Betty's interaction goes from faintly intriguing to faintly repellent in a matter of seconds. "You'll get eaten alive out here," Don tells her, sounding extra sleazy. "You know mosquitoes ignore me," Betty answers, possibly referring to his tendency to ignore her. "In those shorts?" he asks, and then it's on. Don's pouring Betty booze, reminding us that these two go together like a pair of lying, cheating, remorseless drunks, a moment of mirroring that's echoed throughout the episode. When Don talks about teenagers in revolt, it's clearer than ever that Don and Betty are united in their old-school ways, two conventional mainstream beauty queens who never understood all the fuss about ideals and moral high ground.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/27/mad_men_recap_don_and_betty_together_again_sort_of/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/27/mad_men_recap_don_and_betty_together_again_sort_of/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Mad Men&#8221; recap: Love, acid and whores. Lots of whores</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/mad_men_recap_love_acid_and_whores_lots_of_whores/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/mad_men_recap_love_acid_and_whores_lots_of_whores/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[don draper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mad men recap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chevy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13303266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don fails an electric Kool-Aid acid test, as his mommy issues climb through every open doorway]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If last week's "Mad Men" was packed with satisfying scenes – Ted getting advice from his dying friend, Peggy scolding Don, Don sweating and shaking in Ted's plane while Ted plays the hero, Sylvia leaving Don – then this week's episode was all agitation and mania with much less payoff. "The Crash" began with recklessness, progressed to madness, and closed with remorse. Along the way, there were strange and colorful moments: Ken crashed, then tap-danced. Stan arm wrestled, then got stabbed in the arm, then mourned his cousin, then made a pass. Sally scolded her brother, then sassed her mother, then told her father she hardly knows him. Peggy rolled her eyes at Don, comforted Ted, and turned down Stan's advance. And good lord, have we ever seen Peggy turn down an advance before? Pete, Duck, Abe, Ted ... Peggy has always been the girl who says yes to halfhearted passes. Maybe this means she's finally an adult.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/mad_men_recap_love_acid_and_whores_lots_of_whores/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/mad_men_recap_love_acid_and_whores_lots_of_whores/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stop comparing everything to &#8220;Girls&#8221;!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/stop_comparing_everything_to_girls/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/stop_comparing_everything_to_girls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 22:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Girls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lena Dunham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frances Ha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noah Baumbach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greta Gerwig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[30 Rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tina Fey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vampire Weekend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portlandia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mindy Kaling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13300684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vampire Weekend, "30 Rock," Sheryl Sandberg, "Spring Breakers" -- everything is just like "Girls." Except it isn't]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Frances Ha," a film co-written by Noah Baumbach and the actress Greta Gerwig, is about a woman in her late 20s who is thwarted in her desire to become an artist by a lack of resources.</p><p>So naturally it must be just like "Girls"! Except it isn't. At all.</p><p>Hannah Horvath, the hero of "Girls," is younger than Frances and far more confident in her art. Although Hannah's family won't help her pay the bills, she seems to, as of late, magically have enough money to pay the bills every month. Frances, with a few more years of disillusionment under her belt, faces down far more serious challenges than does Hannah -- which isn't a criticism of "Girls."</p><p>But none of those differences have stopped the easy comparisons. Turns out there really is a more pernicious and lazy cultural reference than comparing anything in the 1960s to Don Draper's life, or equating anything quirky and indie with <a href="www.salon.com/2012/02/23/stop_comparing_everything_to_portlandia/">"Portlandia."</a> Please, let's come to an understanding: Culture writers of America, we will believe you know about "Girls" even if you don't compare everything about young people in cities to Lena Dunham.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/stop_comparing_everything_to_girls/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/stop_comparing_everything_to_girls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From &#8220;Mad Women&#8221; to Stephen Colbert: 5 creative protests that got people talking</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/from_mad_women_to_stephen_colbert_5_creative_protests_that_got_people_talking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/from_mad_women_to_stephen_colbert_5_creative_protests_that_got_people_talking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 20:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creative activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[west bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Westboro Baptist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saudi Arabia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13299659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A roundup of protests that show how, sometimes, a little razzle dazzle can deliver a big message ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Wednesday, a group of North Carolina women dressed up in 60s era "Mad Men" garb to protest a bill that would allow employers to refuse to cover contraception for "moral" or religious reasons.</p><p>The theatrical protest, organized by Planned Parenthood of Central North Carolina, wasn't the first time activists have employed a bit of razzle dazzle to draw attention to an issue and get people talking.</p><p>Below, a roundup of five protests that show how, sometimes, a little flare can make a big difference.</p><p><strong>Mad, Mad Women</strong></p><p>As noted above, the North Carolina group made a splash on Tuesday, wearing dapper vintage outfits to make their point that access to birth control is basic health care. The Republican-controlled judicial committee went on to approve the measure, which now heads for a full vote in the General Assembly, but the Mad Women caused a social media stir and brought national attention to a bill that may have otherwise flown under the radar, as Laura Basset <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/15/north-carolina-birth-control_n_3280295.html?utm_hp_ref=tw" target="_blank">reported</a> for the Huffington Post:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/from_mad_women_to_stephen_colbert_5_creative_protests_that_got_people_talking/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/from_mad_women_to_stephen_colbert_5_creative_protests_that_got_people_talking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Mad Men&#8221; recap: Take everything off for me</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/mad_men_recap_take_everything_off_for_me/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/mad_men_recap_take_everything_off_for_me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 12:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mad men recap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[don draper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mohawk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joan holloway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peggy olson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13297018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Masculinity in crisis! Don and Ted face off, but it's Sylvia who lands the biggest blow to Don's ego]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just when "Mad Men" was starting to sag under the weight of its own hefty ambitions, we get two truly satisfying episodes in a row that remind us all of the reasons why we love this crazy show in the first place.</p><p>First, there's the dialogue. As longtime viewers, it's easy to get bogged down by the symbolic significance of every scene, and get distracted by Don's downward spiral into damnation, so much so that we can't see the trees for the forest. Maybe we tend to take the crackling, unpredictable dialogue of "Mad Men" for granted; this episode it was too good to ignore.</p><p>Second, there are the satisfying scenes. The best TV writers figure out ways to serve up some really tasty payoffs for viewers. On "The Wire," even against a dystopian backdrop, you had these great moments of connection between McNulty and Bunk, or Omar and his boyfriend, among others. On "Six Feet Under," Claire and Nate and Rachel may have been struggling or sinking into a funk, but they'd always have ways of gaining leverage on the people bringing them down. For all of its gloom and doom, "Mad Men" still offers some of the most satisfying payoffs of any drama on television.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/mad_men_recap_take_everything_off_for_me/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/mad_men_recap_take_everything_off_for_me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Mad Men&#8221; recap: &#8220;Power plus design equals adventure!&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/mad_men_recap_power_plus_design_equals_adventure/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/mad_men_recap_power_plus_design_equals_adventure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 13:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mad men recap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[don draper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peggy olson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pete campbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roger sterling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chevy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13290653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a rip-roaring episode, Don goes to Detroit to save the day. But are his heroics beginning to wear thin? ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After last week's Very Special (and very tone-deaf) "Mad Men" episode on MLK Jr's assassination, "For Immediate Release" was exactly the sort of release we were craving. So much action, so much madness, so many dramatic changes afoot! Instead of impotently crouched over their radios, TV screens and telephones, waiting for the latest word on how the world is crumbling around them, Roger, Don, Peggy and Joan are conquering new horizons – or at the very least, taking on dangerous new challenges.</p><p>We begin with Bert and Pete scheming with Joan to take the company public, and Pete even has the gall to hit on Joan. (She says no, loud and clear, and then tells him, "I hope Clara reminded you tomorrow's Mother's Day." I love how she has become the moral center of the office – or at least the center of restraint and discretion.) Meanwhile, Roger ditches his inherited shoeshine kit (which signals his reckoning with death) to rush off to the airport to romance not his stewardess lover, but an executive from Chevy. Instead of mourning his eventual demise, Roger is thinking about his legacy – which we can see from the fact that he takes three copies of his autobiography out of his travel bag, but leaves the last one in. This idea of making your mark before you die is scattered throughout the episode, along with lots of talk of death (Roger says, of Jaguar, "This could be fatal"; Ted finds out his art director is dying of pancreatic cancer; Rosen says he has a heart and a kid who needs a heart and both are dead.) Everyone in this episode is looking for salvation, redemption, delivery from history's dustbin – but are they kidding themselves? Is their bravery in the face of absurd obstacles just another way of running away from the specter of death? Is their passion for work meaningful, or is it just a distraction that keeps them from facing the truth about themselves?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/mad_men_recap_power_plus_design_equals_adventure/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/mad_men_recap_power_plus_design_equals_adventure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Mad Men&#8221; recapped via Facebook updates</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/mad_men_recapped_via_facebook_updates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/mad_men_recapped_via_facebook_updates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 21:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recaps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If all of your favorite characters were friends on your News Feed]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are behind on the current season of "Mad Men," you could read <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/mad_men_recap_the_prestige_that_comes_with_ketchup/">Heather Havrilesky's recaps</a> to understand how the ad execs at Sterling Cooper Draper Pryce are faring in 1968.</p><p>But if you're <em>really</em> short on time, you should check out these amusing Facebook recaps, via <a href="http://www.happyplace.com/23552/mad-men-facebook-recap-season-6-episode-5">HappyPlace.com</a>.</p><p>Here are a few from season 6:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/mad_men_recapped_via_facebook_updates/screen_shot_2013_05_01_at_5_10_46_pm/" rel="attachment wp-att-13287160"><img src="http://media.salon.com/2013/05/Screen-Shot-2013-05-01-at-5.10.46-PM.png" alt="" title="Screen Shot 2013-05-01 at 5.10.46 PM" class="size-full wp-image-13287160" height="293" width="462" /></a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/mad_men_recapped_via_facebook_updates/screen_shot_2013_05_01_at_4_47_43_pm_2/" rel="attachment wp-att-13287153"><img src="http://media.salon.com/2013/05/Screen-Shot-2013-05-01-at-4.47.43-PM1.png" alt="" title="Screen Shot 2013-05-01 at 4.47.43 PM" class="size-full wp-image-13287153" height="482" width="542" /></a></p><p>Head over to <a href="http://www.happyplace.com/23552/mad-men-facebook-recap-season-6-episode-5">HappyPlace.com</a> for more.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/mad_men_recapped_via_facebook_updates/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/mad_men_recapped_via_facebook_updates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Must-see morning clip: Jon Hamm announces marriage to Aasif Mandvi</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/must_see_morning_clip_jon_hamm_announces_marriage_to_aasif_mandvi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/must_see_morning_clip_jon_hamm_announces_marriage_to_aasif_mandvi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freaks and geeks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must see morning clip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily Show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Stewart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13285524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The "Mad Men" actor talks season six,  "Freaks and Geeks," and why he's going to India]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Mad Men" actor Jon Hamm talked season six on last night's "Daily Show," in which "Freaks and Geeks" star Linda Cardellini guest-stars as his new love interest. Cardellini's, aka Lindsay Weir's, presence on set was kept under wraps to prevent the <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/linda-cardellini-mad-men-don-434695">Internet from exploding</a> before the episode aired. "I remember her as a junior, senior in high school," said Jon Stewart. "Because of DVR I remember from, like, 6 months ago. And then you turn it on and you're like, 'Did she travel to space? How did she age ten years?' " </p><p>Hamm also plugged his upcoming movie with "Daily Show" correspondent Aasif Mandvi, "Million Dollar Arm," set in India, which serves as a convenient backdrop for their upcoming marriage.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/must_see_morning_clip_jon_hamm_announces_marriage_to_aasif_mandvi/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/must_see_morning_clip_jon_hamm_announces_marriage_to_aasif_mandvi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>