<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Mad Men</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/mad_men/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 15:05:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Mad Men&#8217;s&#8221; indecent proposal</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/28/mad_mens_indecent_proposal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/28/mad_mens_indecent_proposal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 12:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12928395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an turbulent episode, the boys at SCDP make Joan a despicable offer -- and, in the process, lose their souls]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What shall it profit an ad agency if it gains a luxury car but loses its soul?</p><p>As Lane said about Don watching Megan singing <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/26/mad_mens_dance_sensation/">“Zou Bisou Bisou”</a> in the season premiere, I think I saw SCDP’s soul leave its body last night, not just once but twice: when all the partners except Don agreed that Joan should prostitute herself for the firm, and when Peggy left. Which seems like a smart move, given how women who work at the agency are now being sold off to the highest and most disgusting bidder.</p><p>Being underappreciated has been Peggy’s theme song for years, but not having experienced work – much less success -- anywhere else, she’s been afraid to leave. Now, as former boss and mentor Freddy Rumsen puts it, she’s reached the point where she has to decide whether she’s ambitious or just complaining. “If this was about work and not about feeling, you’d make a move,” he argues, bringing up the central conflict of the episode, in which people make moves based on work – and the success and money it brings -- rather than on good old human feeling, either for themselves or for each other.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/28/mad_mens_indecent_proposal/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/28/mad_mens_indecent_proposal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don Draper&#8217;s reckoning nears</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/21/don_drapers_reckoning_nears/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/21/don_drapers_reckoning_nears/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12923772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In last night's "Mad Men," SCDP staff acted like teenagers -- but they won't get away with it for much longer]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Hold fast to dreams/For if dreams die/Life is a broken-winged bird/That cannot fly.” African-American poet Langston Hughes <a href="http://www.poets.org/viewmedia.php/prmMID/16075" target="_blank">published these poignant words</a> in 1930, but they didn’t appear in countless yearbook inscriptions and on dorm room posters until the '60s and '70s, when pursuing one’s dreams became the cultural imperative. Following your personal dream meant different things to different people, but it commonly involved rebuking the unified “American dream” everyone had previously agreed upon: marriage, family, a home (one you owned, in post WWII America) and a car. And as Americans became more focused on their personal states, the ones they lived in became distinctly less united.</p><p>In “Christmas Waltz,” the latest episode of “Mad Men,” we find out that cars are part of the dream for ad agencies, too – a sign that they’ve arrived, just as owning a car was once a sign of achieving adulthood, something that the staff at SCDP also hasn’t done yet. Instead, like teenagers, they’re stealing money from their corporate parents’ wallets, driving other people’s cars too fast, napping when they should be working, drinking too much, throwing tantrums (and other things) and having sex with near-strangers. And just as it did in America as a whole, this behavior is taking its toll on their personal unions – or will do so before long.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/21/don_drapers_reckoning_nears/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/21/don_drapers_reckoning_nears/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>68</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Mad Men&#8217;s&#8221; evil twins</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/14/mad_mens_evil_twins/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/14/mad_mens_evil_twins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12920081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an episode filled with doubles, Don shows his brilliance -- and Betty returns with a nefarious plan]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“I don’t like going in with two ideas – it’s weak.”</p><p>A strange statement coming from a man with a dual identity and often hidden motives, but then “Dark Shadows,” the latest “Mad Men” episode, is rife with competitive doubles, if not actual evil twins. (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_Shadows" target="_blank">Just like in a soap opera</a>, wink wink.) Don and Ginsberg have dueling <a href="http://snowizard.com/history/" target="_blank">SnoBall</a> campaigns, Peggy reminds Roger she’s supposed to be his secret sharer rather than that <em>schlemiel</em> Ginsberg, Megan struggles to be friends with both Sally and Don, Henry’s torn between two candidates he’s worked for, and everyone seems to have at least two wives – even if Pete’s second one belongs to another man. Unlike the SnoBall fight with Ginsberg that he rigs, Don wins the wife competition fair and square by having three, even if one was in name only. As Betty tells Sally when she works on her family tree, “They only care about the names anyway.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/14/mad_mens_evil_twins/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/14/mad_mens_evil_twins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>74</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Mad Men&#8217;s&#8221; generation gap</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/07/mad_mens_generation_gap_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/07/mad_mens_generation_gap_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 12:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12915977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Megan makes a surprising choice, Don is confronted with changing '60s culture -- and Pete's spiral continues]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something strange occurred somewhere in the middle of the 1960s. People began doing what they felt like doing, rather than what was expected of them.</p><p>Of course, rebels and freethinkers had always done this, but they were rare and often paid a price for their actions, even losing their lives. Now ordinary people began adopting the mantra, “If it feels good, do it.” Personal satisfaction, rather than duty, increasingly became the driver behind people’s choices. And they didn’t pay a price, unless you count the anger and jealousy evoked in those who weren’t courageous enough to do the same. Nearly 200 years after America was founded on a right to the “pursuit of happiness,” Americans began to claim that right. And they’ve never looked back.</p><p>“There are no second acts in American life,” F. Scott Fitzgerald famously declared, without living long enough to see the constant self-reinvention of our age. In “Lady Lazarus,” the latest episode of “Mad Men,” Megan chooses to re-make her life, simply because her career isn’t making her happy. Even with her recent success, and the discovery that she’s able to “do everything,” (as Don declared in a tone of awe), she finds advertising so boring that leaving it is akin to raising herself from the dead.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/07/mad_mens_generation_gap_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/07/mad_mens_generation_gap_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>82</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TV&#8217;s gift to bad actors</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/30/tvs_gift_to_bad_actors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/30/tvs_gift_to_bad_actors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12912067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From "Mad Men's" January Jones to "Castle's" Stana Katic, the medium is weirdly suited to inexpressive mediocrity]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Mad Men” and ABC’s romantic-detective procedural “Castle” don’t seem to have much in common: One is the best show on television, and the other is a perfectly serviceable will-they-won’t-they series on ABC. But both “Mad Men” and “Castle” (which airs its second-to-last episode of the season tonight) contain frosty, unlikable, not-very-good actresses in pivotal roles — January Jones as Betty Draper and Stana Katic as Detective Kate Beckett, the romantic lead playing across from the antic Nathan Fillion — and it hardly matters to the series’ well-being at all.</p><p>Betty is a very interesting character, but having seen Jones on “Saturday Night Live" and in “X-Men: First Class,” in which she could barely play an actual Ice Queen, I have no lingering doubts about her skill set. Meanwhile, the consistently rated “Castle” has gained quite a following, despite the fact that Katic makes the main character on “Bones,” who is supposed to fall somewhere on the autism spectrum, seem emotionally intuitive and empathic. My point here is not to rag on Jones and Katic, so much as marvel at how little their failings have mattered to the shows they work on. Television is very kind to bad actors.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/30/tvs_gift_to_bad_actors/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/30/tvs_gift_to_bad_actors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>84</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don Draper loses his touch</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/30/don_draper_loses_his_touch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/30/don_draper_loses_his_touch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12912027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At an awards ceremony celebrating his accomplishments, he learns that some things are not what they seem ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last night “<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zpqt3zgdYUw" target="_blank">At the Codfish Ball</a>,” our mad men and women learned that life isn’t a party just because you’ve dressed yourself up, and losing can sometimes appear disguised behind a mask of winning. Fortunately, to borrow Cosgrove’s term, there’s also the possibility of a “double secret reverse,” in which you get what makes you happy even if it’s not what you expected – or what others think is right.</p><p>In this fish tale, the genders are moving up and down like parallel elevators in the Time-Life building, the workplace that consumes so much of their lives they barely can escape it for a meal that doesn’t involve business – and in this episode, not even for that. But this show is about time and life – the time in these characters’ lives, and the times they’re living in. Unfortunately for them, few seem to be having the time of their lives.</p><p>After her failure to impersonate Don, Peggy’s off the Heinz account, but seems in good spirits when Stan and Ginsberg treat her like one of the boys. She rolls with the sexual banter about how she’s got a way with the equipment on the Playtex account, as well as Ginsberg’s criticism that she’s a “traditionalist in the bosom arena” (something that will be challenged in this episode), defending her opinion about selling youthful, sexy bras to older women.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/30/don_draper_loses_his_touch/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/30/don_draper_loses_his_touch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>94</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where are the heroes?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/23/where_are_the_heroes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/23/where_are_the_heroes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12907850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dislikable antiheroes have taken over the TV landscape. It would be nice to have someone to root for again]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week, a strange thing happened on “Mad Men," stranger than Fat Betty, Roger’s marriage-ending acid trip, or even Don’s <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/thumbnail_570x321/2012/04/jon_hamm_plaid_coat.jpg">blindingly plaid dinner jacket</a>: Don Draper lectured Pete on the sanctity of marriage. In the cab ride home from a business-slash-pleasure trip to a brothel, Don condescended to Pete, “Look, I am just trying to tell you because I am who I am and I’ve been where I’ve been that you don’t get another chance at what you have … If I’d met [Megan] first I’d have known not to throw it away.” Up to that point in the season, king cad Don Draper has been transformed into an adoring, puppyish married man, one who had nightmares about committing infidelity and swaggered while fixing busted sinks, not pleasuring other people’s wives. Before last night’s episode, and his wild display of bossy childishness, workplace dysfunction, and enforced sherbet eating, Don Draper was no longer quite an antihero. Of course it couldn’t last.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/23/where_are_the_heroes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/23/where_are_the_heroes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>56</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Mad Men&#8221; on drugs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/23/mad_men_on_drugs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/23/mad_men_on_drugs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 09:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12907868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Roger takes the leap into LSD, while Peggy and Don dramatically discover their own dependencies]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as we’re being totally real with each other, I have a confession to make: I’ve never taken LSD. But I did work at a Hojo’s for three summers in high school, and the particular shades of orange and turquoise the company used for its décor and uniforms is forever burned into my brain. I’ve been seeing those colors all season on “Mad Men” and feeling a bad acid flashback to the long hot days I spent in a polyester uniform serving up “tendersweet fried clams” and sticky bowls of ice cream. But I kept shaking off the feeling that those colors represented anything significant. Like others who’ve picked up on subtle symbols and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/30/pete_campbell_1934_1966/" target="_blank">made predictions about the show</a>, I should have realized that this was a sign something big was going to happen in a Hojo’s.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/23/mad_men_on_drugs/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/23/mad_men_on_drugs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>60</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Mad Men&#8221; loses its cool</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/16/mad_men_loses_its_cool/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/16/mad_men_loses_its_cool/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12871261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For a show known for its subtlety, this season has been filled with obvious, stagey moments]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the run-up to “Mad Men’s” fifth season, series creator Matt Weiner said <a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/03/07/the-mad-men-season-that-almost-wasnt-an-interview-with-matthew-weiner-part-1/">over and</a> <a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;rct=j&amp;q=&amp;esrc=s&amp;source=web&amp;cd=1&amp;ved=0CDsQFjAA&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.salon.com%2F2012%2F03%2F18%2Fmatt_weiner_mad_men_is_about_today%2F&amp;ei=OxiMT7HKDKLk0QHm74DTCQ&amp;usg=AFQjCNFrmoCRzRjWYz2MA8pAvPCJhKJOKg">over again</a> that one of the year’s big themes would be "When does everything get back to normal?” -- the idea that epic, necessary changes don’t always feel real, not to mention welcome, to the people they’re happening to. Four episodes into the new season, I’m wondering a similar thing: When will “Mad Men” get back to normal?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/16/mad_men_loses_its_cool/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/16/mad_men_loses_its_cool/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Mad Men&#8221;: Pete&#8217;s spiral of doom</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/16/mad_men_petes_spiral_of_doom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/16/mad_men_petes_spiral_of_doom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 12:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12871141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Mad Man becomes even more insufferable, dejected and delusional. Are we being prepared for his death?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Roger, you’re not the only one who wanted to see it.</p><p>Many “Mad Men” fans were no doubt just as eager as the staff of SCDP to see someone finally smack Pete’s smug little face. Rarely a sympathetic figure, Pete’s been made increasingly insufferable this season, whining about getting no love from his colleagues while doing everything possible to make them despise him.</p><p>In the latest episode, “Signal 30,” he childishly belittles Lane for landing a new client, Jaguar, and initially refuses to help him close the deal even after Don points out that adding automobiles to planes will raise the struggling agency’s stature.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/16/mad_men_petes_spiral_of_doom/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/16/mad_men_petes_spiral_of_doom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>89</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A most disturbing &#8220;Mad Men&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/09/a_most_disturbing_mad_men/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/09/a_most_disturbing_mad_men/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 12:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12831771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recap: In a nightmarish episode, a woman from Don's past returns -- and Joan discovers a big secret]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I once read about a research study that surveyed men’s and women’s worst fears about the opposite gender. What the majority of men feared most was that a woman would laugh at or humiliate them. What women feared most was that a man would kill them.</p><p>Research into abusers and killers suggests a strong link between those two fears, with violence often triggered by feelings of humiliation and powerlessness. Both genders see the power to destroy as resting in the other’s hands – those hands that you may want to hold, or hands that may want to hold you, either lovingly or violently.</p><p>All of these fears are portrayed in “Mystery Date,” which may rank as the most disturbing episode ever of “Mad Men.” The dark side of the fairy tale of American life and of American marriage has been a constant theme of the series, and in this spooky house of an episode, various characters play Sleeping Beauty, only to wake up safely back in the brighter world (at least we hope that Sally will, once that Seconal wears off).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/09/a_most_disturbing_mad_men/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/09/a_most_disturbing_mad_men/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>74</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Mad Men&#8217;s&#8221; generation gap</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/02/mad_mens_generation_gap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/02/mad_mens_generation_gap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12779651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recap: In an episode obsessed with youth and death, even Don Draper can't always get what he wants]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill Murray's brilliant existentialist comedy “Groundhog Day” proposed that life consists of the same day lived over and over again with only minor variations, but that the key to happiness is finding a way to make the most out of the mundane. “Tea Leaves,” the third episode (the second to air, but the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/26/mad_mens_eventful_return/singleton/">two-hour premiere</a> was labeled as two episodes) of “Mad Men’s” new season, suggests something grimmer: Life is like waiting all night in a crowded concrete hallway thinking you’re about to meet the Rolling Stones, only to find out that you’ve signed a deal with the Trade Winds instead.</p><p>All youthful dreams die, and adult life is the long, slow accommodation to the way things actually are versus the way we not only hoped but <em>believed</em> they’d be. (As Henry puts it later in a more hopeful context, “This is what it could be, but it’s not gonna be.”) “Tea Leaves” draws a bright line between those who are still young and optimistic enough to have dreams – like sunny, yellow-outfitted Megan, back-to-connivingly-striving Pete, our plucky career gal Peggy, and even the new gaffe-a-minute copywriter Michael Ginsberg. On the other side, the middle-aged realists who are in the process of giving their dreams up, including the superannuated Roger, the always-doubtful Don, and the model-turned-matron Betty.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/02/mad_mens_generation_gap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/02/mad_mens_generation_gap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>75</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pete Campbell (1934-1966)</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/30/pete_campbell_1934_1966/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/30/pete_campbell_1934_1966/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entertainment.origin.railrode.net/?p=12762561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since last week's episode, I've become convinced the Mad Man is about to tumble out a window. Here's why]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something inexplicable and crazy happened to me back in 2000. I was in L.A., talking on the phone with my friend Gadi in New York. It was June 30 for me, July 1 for him. Out of nowhere I blurted, “Oh my God! Walter Matthau <a href="http://www.hollywood.com/news/Actor_Walter_Matthau_Dead/312596">just died</a>.” It was bizarre and creepy, but kinda funny too, because I couldn’t possibly be right. I had no connection to Matthau other than being a huge fan. Gadi bet me $25 I was wrong. The memo line of his pay-up check read “1:42 a.m., July 1 2000,” and he included a simple note: “HERE’S YOUR STINKIN’ BLOOD MONEY!” My friend Ali sums it up best: “The most pointless use of supernatural powers ever.”</p><p>Nothing like that ever happened to me before or since, that is, until Sunday night. The flash: Pete Campbell will take a header out a Time &amp; Life Building window, probably around Thanksgiving on the show. (I’m iffy on the when but feeling solid on the who, what and where.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/30/pete_campbell_1934_1966/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/30/pete_campbell_1934_1966/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>71</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Redefining &#8220;wife material&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/26/redefining_wife_material/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/26/redefining_wife_material/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12737361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Mad Men" reminds us that the idea of the "marriageable woman" has evolved dramatically -- and continues to, today]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During a long train ride with an acquaintance, my female friend was recently paid the ultimate compliment. Comparing her to a woman he’s casually seeing, he looked deep into her eyes and said without irony, “but you, you’re <em>wife material.</em>”</p><p>I thought this antiquated expression had gone the way of “arm candy” and “trading up” as part of the second-wave agreement that likening your lady to something you consume or drive is just not cool anymore.  But perhaps even in 2012, our “Mad Men”-fueled nostalgia-fest is making us long for an era of clear-cut sexist distinction, when wives were wives and mistresses, mistresses. The AMC show's fifth season premiere explored this dichotomy, as Don Draper’s secretary-turned-wife Megan bridged the divide separating working women from their marriageable counterparts.</p><p>These days, concerns like Megan's seem absurdly anachronistic, but they also raise a bigger question: In an age of increasing divorce rates and single ladies celebration, what does this <em>wife material </em>“compliment” really mean?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/26/redefining_wife_material/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/26/redefining_wife_material/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Mad Men&#8217;s&#8221; dance sensation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/26/mad_mens_dance_sensation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/26/mad_mens_dance_sensation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 14:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12735311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The most talked-about moment from last night's premiere was a sexy performance -- that left me curled up in anxiety]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The breakout moment of last night’s “Mad Men,” as if you needed telling, occurred a little before the halfway point, when Don Draper’s new, young wife, Megan, not at all just the guileless, gorgeous secretary she seemed to be at the end of Season 4, serenaded him with a rendition of the suddenly famous <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnatBlYTq1c">“Zou Bisou Bisou.”</a> (The title translates to something like, “Oh! Little Kiss.”) Confidently shimmying and shaking around on the couple’s new white carpet in front of the crowded surprise party she orchestrated, Megan sang in French to Don while his colleagues watched and adjusted their belts. You can read about the song, its history, lyrics, and who’s performed it before <a href="http://www.vulture.com/2012/03/zoo-be-zoo-be-zoo-mad-men.html">here</a> and<a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/03/26/mad-men-premiere-a-history-of-zou-bisou-bisou-megan-s-sultry-song-to-don.html"> here</a> and <a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/browbeat/2012/03/25/mad_men_season_5_premiere_why_did_don_s_wife_megan_sing_that_french_song_.html">here</a> and <a href="http://www.gq.com/entertainment/tv/blogs/the-stream/2012/03/so-what-was-that-song-megan-draper-was-singing-on-mad-men.html">here</a>, but I want to talk about how it felt to watch Megan sing it. Because I am still recovering.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/26/mad_mens_dance_sensation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/26/mad_mens_dance_sensation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Mad Men&#8217;s&#8221; eventful return</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/26/mad_mens_eventful_return/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/26/mad_mens_eventful_return/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12728761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recap: The fifth season of "Mad Men" begins, revealing a changed Don -- and a country in the midst of upheaval]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fifth season premiere of “Mad Men” plunges us into June 1966, a mere seven months time-lapse since the previous season, but a gap that’s been filled with dramatic changes in America as well as Sterling Cooper Draper Pryce. From the bright neon colors of the women’s clothes to the increasingly mod set design to the now-frequent protests and riots, we know we’re entering “that” 1960s, a time of turbulence, experimentation and sweeping change. As power struggles rise, groups use language rather than violence to achieve their aims, a shift from might to persuasion that catches some professional persuaders unprepared.</p><p>Several “Mad Men” characters will learn just how dangerous words can be to their status in the world, while others will find themselves losing their place no matter what they say. As in the country as a whole, some characters who’ve always had power are losing it, while others find it within their grasp at last, even if no one will recognize their ascendance. And one notable control freak, a certain Don Draper, lets someone else take over for the first time in his life -- a miracle that requires just a little French kiss.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/26/mad_mens_eventful_return/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/26/mad_mens_eventful_return/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>88</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Mad Men&#8217;s&#8221; year of change</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/23/mad_mens_year_of_change/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/23/mad_mens_year_of_change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12705781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If real life is a guide, this season's time period means big shifts are in store for Don, Joan and Peggy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the last week, it's become <a href="http://flavorwire.com/271368/everything-we-know-about-mad-men-season-5">increasingly clear</a> that the long-delayed fifth season of <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/mad_men/">“Mad Men”</a> will open somewhere in 1966, a turning point year that saw protests against a war and for civil rights, the formation of both the Black Panther Party and the National Organization for Women, and the cultural bookends of the Doors’ first album and the Beatles’ last live concert, as the mop-tops made way for the hippies.</p><p>Creator Matthew Weiner has said in recent interviews that momentous historical changes are often “blips” to people busy with their own life dramas, yet the essence of “Mad Men” has always been its portrayal of the subtle ways that societal events affect even the most self-absorbed individuals. So where did we leave the show’s characters and what might be coming to pierce their Madison Avenue bubble?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/23/mad_mens_year_of_change/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/23/mad_mens_year_of_change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TV&#8217;s greatest luxury good</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/22/tvs_greatest_luxury_good/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/22/tvs_greatest_luxury_good/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12721001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Mad Men" has a tiny audience, and yet our culture is obsessed -- because it makes us feel both smart and stylish]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a mystery to AMC’s “Mad Men,” which returns for its fifth season on Sunday night. This mystery has nothing to do with the year the forthcoming season is set, Don Draper and his fiancé Megan’s relationship, or the litany of other mini-spoilers a Matt Weiner-driven Omerta has forced journalists to hush up about. It is as follows: Why has “Mad Men,” a show watched by less than <a href="http://news-briefs.ew.com/2010/07/26/mad-men-premiere-ratings/">3 million people</a> in which oblique conversations over tumblers of whiskey count as major plot developments, been the "it show" of the last five years?</p><p>“Mad Men’s” greatness — and it is great — is not enough to explain its cultural ubiquity.  “Breaking Bad” attracts both as many viewers and critical hosannas as “Mad Men,” but it has not secured the covers of Rolling Stone, Newsweek, and Entertainment Weekly. Other zeitgeist-inhabiting shows — from “Twin Peaks” and “Survivor” to “Lost” and “The Sopranos” —  have had tens of millions more viewers, and even recent flavor of the month “Downton Abbey” attracted 5 million.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/22/tvs_greatest_luxury_good/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/22/tvs_greatest_luxury_good/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>64</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Matt Weiner: &#8220;Mad Men&#8221; is about today</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/18/matt_weiner_mad_men_is_about_today/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/18/matt_weiner_mad_men_is_about_today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[matt weiner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12684391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matt Weiner discusses the new season, the 9/11 ad controversy -- and what the show says about America, now]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last new episode of <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/mad_men/">"Mad Men"</a> aired on Oct. 17, 2010. Next Sunday -- a year and and five months later -- we'll finally get another glimpse of Don Draper, Peggy Olson, the other employees of Sterling, Cooper, Draper, Pryce and all their chic outfits, when "Mad Men" begins its long-awaited fifth season.</p><p>Matt Weiner, the show's creator, spoke with us about the new season, or, more accurately, spoke with us on the <em>occasion</em> of the new season. Weiner, as you'll see, is a strict constructionist when it comes to spoilers, and in addition to specifically requesting that the press reveal nothing to the audience — not the year in which the new season is set or basic plot developments — he makes sure to answer questions with as few hints as possible. But, even avoiding major plot revelations, Weiner had a lot to say about this year's big themes, all those TV shows aping "Mad Men's" style, the recent controversy about the "Mad Men" ad campaign, and when, if ever, American society is going to get back to normal.</p><p><strong>I found it very touching to see these characters again after so long. Did you find that you had missed them?</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/18/matt_weiner_mad_men_is_about_today/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/18/matt_weiner_mad_men_is_about_today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When I sold out to advertising</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/16/when_i_sold_out_to_advertising/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/16/when_i_sold_out_to_advertising/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers and Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12683631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like any proper writer and academic, I always shunned the profession. Then I realized I was the delusional one]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best cautionary story I ever heard came from a distinguished man in a snug, hillside coffee shop on a thundery Seattle afternoon.</p><p>I was new to the area, trailing a high-tech spouse who worked 14-hour days. The gloom had settled in. It was good weather for writing but after several hours, scenes from “The Shining” would be running through my head. I was slogging away at a second novel (my first was a tiny seller, now remaindered). I’d been a visiting professor in Providence and Minneapolis, but for the first time I couldn’t even find an adjunct job.</p><p>So this man offered to show me the city, grab a cup of coffee and talk for a while. He listened and gave me good advice. Then as dusk overtook the storm, he told me his tale.</p><p>At 30, he’d been a promising history scholar, on faculty at a major university and traveling the world. But after five years, he was denied tenure. And suddenly, everything in his life — teaching, research, sabbaticals — simply disappeared.</p><p>He fell apart briefly, then rallied and decided to write a book. It would be successful and he’d reclaim his rightful place. A few years into the project, he won a prestigious grant. And with that, he became obsessed. His marriage fell apart; he lived on next to nothing. When he finished the novel and his agent couldn't sell it, the man hired a series of editors to help him revise.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/16/when_i_sold_out_to_advertising/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/16/when_i_sold_out_to_advertising/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>100</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

