<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Marco Rubio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/marco_rubio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 18:34:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Peter King: &#8220;I wouldn&#8217;t want to be involving New York with Ted Cruz&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/peter_king_i_wouldnt_want_to_be_involving_new_york_with_ted_cruz/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/peter_king_i_wouldnt_want_to_be_involving_new_york_with_ted_cruz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 13:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Cruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricane Sandy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["It's a little early to forgive and forget," King said of Cruz's vote against Hurricane Sandy aid]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Peter King doesn't think the New York GOP should have invited Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, to host its fundraiser this month, in light of his vote against Hurricane Sandy relief aid. "I wouldn't want to be involving New York with Ted Cruz," King said.</p><p>"He went out of his way to attack New York on the bill,” King, R-N.Y., added, the <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dc/2013/05/ny-gop-welcomes-ted-cruz-pete-king-does-not">New York Daily News</a> reports. "It's a little early to forgive and forget."</p><p>“It’s life and death,” King continued. “There were really false and phony charges made against the Sandy aid, and if Ted Cruz had prevailed, my constituents would be homeless."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/peter_king_i_wouldnt_want_to_be_involving_new_york_with_ted_cruz/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/peter_king_i_wouldnt_want_to_be_involving_new_york_with_ted_cruz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ted Cruz will never be president</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/ted_cruz_will_never_be_president/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/ted_cruz_will_never_be_president/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 17:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Cruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Costa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13286745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Breathless staffers say he’s got 2016 plans, but the Tea Party bully will never win a national election. Bank on it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the 2012 election cycle I occasionally ran stories declaring that various Republicans being touted as White House material “will never be president.” <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/12/sarah_palin_president/">Sarah Palin </a>after her narcissistic Gabby Giffords meltdown; <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/16/newt_gingrich_will_never_be_president/">Newt Gingrich</a> early in his race-baiting campaign; <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/12/mitt_romney_will_never_be_president/">Mitt Romney</a> after his British Olympics screw-up.</p><p>I batted 1.000 for that cycle, but it was easy. In 2016, Republicans won’t be facing a Democratic incumbent, so somebody has a shot. I recently wrote that <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/why_chris_christie_wont_be_president/">New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie</a> will never be president, due to his out-of-control anger issues, but candidly, I think that’s my riskiest one yet.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/ted_cruz_will_never_be_president/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/ted_cruz_will_never_be_president/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>239</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Gang of Eight&#8221; freezes out gay immigrants in reform bill</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/gang_of_eight_freezes_out_gay_immigrants_in_reform_bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/gang_of_eight_freezes_out_gay_immigrants_in_reform_bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 13:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gang of eight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13286505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now Democrats must decide if they will offer an amendment to include gay immigrants in the reform package]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much has been said about the 844-page bipartisan immigration reform package introduced in April. Some Republicans have called it "amnesty," while many immigrant rights groups view it as unnecessarily punitive. But no one on either side of the debate has called it "gay friendly" -- because it isn't.</p><p>The measure excludes a provision to allow American citizens to sponsor their same-sex partners for legal permanent residency. To do so, Republicans among the "Gang of Eight" allege, would be legislative suicide.</p><p>“There’s a reason this language wasn’t included in the Gang of Eight’s bill: It’s a deal-breaker for most Republicans,” Senator Jeff Flake (R-AZ) <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/01/us/politics/push-to-include-gay-couples-in-immigration-bill.html?hp" target="_blank">told</a> the New York Times. “Finding consensus on immigration legislation is tough enough without opening the bill up to social issues.”</p><p>Flake's "social issues" refer, more directly, to the very existence of gay immigrants and their families, a reality that many Republicans and Democrats seem eager to overlook in the name of political expedience.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/gang_of_eight_freezes_out_gay_immigrants_in_reform_bill/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/gang_of_eight_freezes_out_gay_immigrants_in_reform_bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How sincere is Democrats&#8217; new commitment to gay rights?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/how_sincere_is_democrats_new_commitment_to_gay_rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/how_sincere_is_democrats_new_commitment_to_gay_rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 17:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gang of eight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Schumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrick J. Leahy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D-Vt.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay Carney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13278593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While the right cries amnesty over the immigration bill, the left should be protesting its exclusion of gay couples]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When President Barack Obama first introduced his <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/01/29/fact-sheet-fixing-our-broken-immigration-system-so-everyone-plays-rules">principles for immigration reform</a> a little over two months ago, one notable point of differentiation from the Senate’s framework was that he chose to include same-sex couples and their kids in his plan.</p><p>As Stephen Colbert noted <a href="http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/423503/february-04-2013/bipartisan-immigration-reform">on "The Colbert Report,"</a> the president’s plan said it would treat “same-sex families as families.”</p><p>“What’s next, Mr. President,” Colbert jested, “treating gay people as <em>people</em>?”</p><p>But now that the Senate’s Gang of Eight has introduced its immigration bill and it notably excludes the provision that would allow U.S. citizens to sponsor their same-sex partners for residency, the White House appears to be wavering.</p><p>When asked last week whether the president was willing to “let that provision go” at a White House briefing, press secretary Jay Carney responded, “It is certainly the case, as the president said in his statement, that not everything in the bill reflects how he would write it, but it broadly is consistent with his principles.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/how_sincere_is_democrats_new_commitment_to_gay_rights/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/how_sincere_is_democrats_new_commitment_to_gay_rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What pet projects are tacked onto immigration reform?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/what_pet_projects_are_tacked_onto_immigration_reform/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/what_pet_projects_are_tacked_onto_immigration_reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 13:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bennet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Schumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsey Graham]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13278266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Members of the Gang of Eight slipped in extra provisions to benefit foreign workers their states [UPDATED]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like many bills in Congress, the Gang of Eight's immigration reform bill includes funding for a number of pet projects, designed to protect foreign workers in certain state-centric industries:</p><p>From the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323551004578437030673785150.html?mod=WSJ_WSJ_US_News_5">Wall Street Journal</a>:</p><blockquote><p>South Carolina Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham wants more visas for the meat industry, a major employer in his state. Sen. Charles Schumer (D., N.Y.) pushed for special treatment for Irish workers; his state is home to a large population with Irish ancestry.</p> <p>Republican Sen. Marco Rubio sought help for the cruise-ship industry, a big business in his home state of Florida. And Democratic Sen. Michael Bennet of Colorado wove in a boost for ski areas.</p></blockquote><p><strong>UPDATE: </strong>This post has been updated to clarify that the provisions included in the bill are meant to benefit foreign workers in each state.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/what_pet_projects_are_tacked_onto_immigration_reform/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/what_pet_projects_are_tacked_onto_immigration_reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House GOPer: Grassley&#8217;s immigration comments &#8220;not appropriate&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/house_goper_grassleys_immigration_comments_not_appropriate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/house_goper_grassleys_immigration_comments_not_appropriate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 18:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Grassley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mario Diaz-Balart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Bombings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13276480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sen. Grassley had tied immigration reform to the Boston bombing suspects]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart, a Republican from Florida who is leading the House's drafting of immigration reform, said that he thought it was "not appropriate" for Sen. Chuck Grassley to tie immigration to the manhunt for the Boston bombing suspects at this point.</p><p>"Linking something like that to other legislation I think is probably not appropriate at this time," Diaz-Balart told <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/immigration/2013/04/19/1896261/mario-diaz-balart-immigration-reform-boston/">ThinkProgress</a>. "In the first place, we don’t have the facts. What I will tell you is, what is indisputable, is that we have an immigration system that is broken."</p><p>He continued that, "If somebody is here today in the United States and commits a crime, it is under the current immigration system," so "what does that lead me to believe? That we have to fix the current immigration system, if in fact there is any connection between immigration at all."</p><p>Grassley kicked off the Senate's Friday hearing on immigration reform by saying: “We also appreciate the opportunity to talk about immigration. Particularly in light of all that’s happening in Massachusetts right now and over the last week."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/house_goper_grassleys_immigration_comments_not_appropriate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/house_goper_grassleys_immigration_comments_not_appropriate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston manhunt used for point-scoring on immigration, gun control</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/boston_manhunt_used_for_point_scoring_on_immigration_gun_control/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/boston_manhunt_used_for_point_scoring_on_immigration_gun_control/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 15:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Grassley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ann Coulter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bryan Fischer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13276271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As information continues to pour in, the politicizations begin]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As law enforcement officials work to capture the second bombing suspect in the Boston attacks, pundits are already using the unfolding events to score political points on immigration reform and gun control.</p><p>The first lawmaker to bring Boston into the immigration debate, which is <a href="http://www.rollcall.com/news/grassley_links_boston_bombing_suspects_to_immigration_debate-224166-1.html?pos=hftxt">currently</a> going on in a Senate hearing, was Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa."We appreciate the ability to talk about immigration, particularly in light of the events in Boston," he said.</p><p>Sen. Marco Rubio's office put out a statement urging people to avoid politicizing Boston. "Boston is still developing and it's too soon to jump to conclusions, let alone use the tragedy to make political points."</p><p>But that didn't stop Twitter:</p><p>[embedtweet id="325196470716334080"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="325273944896729088"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="325239645925425152"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="325235433783046144"]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/boston_manhunt_used_for_point_scoring_on_immigration_gun_control/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/boston_manhunt_used_for_point_scoring_on_immigration_gun_control/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coulter attacks Rubio over Boston suspect&#8217;s immigration status</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/coulter_tweets_about_bombing_suspects_immigration_status/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/coulter_tweets_about_bombing_suspects_immigration_status/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 13:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ann Coulter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tamerlan Tsarnaev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Bombings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13276154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["It's too bad Suspect No. 1 won't be able to be legalized by Marco Rubio, now," she said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As law enforcement continues the manhunt for the second suspect in the Boston bombings, Ann Coulter took the opportunity to tweet about Tamerlan Tsarnaev, the suspect who was killed by officials early this morning, who became a legal permanent resident in 2007.</p><p>[embedtweet id="325196470716334080"]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/coulter_tweets_about_bombing_suspects_immigration_status/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/coulter_tweets_about_bombing_suspects_immigration_status/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Immigration: The latest watered-down compromise GOP hates anyway</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/will_immigration_bill_be_a_replay_of_guns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/will_immigration_bill_be_a_replay_of_guns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 15:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gang of eight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Undocumented immigrants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13275151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New proposal will do little to fix our broken system, and passing it will cost Obama real capital. Sound familiar?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The road to citizenship isn’t exactly shovel ready. In fact, even calling it a road might be a stretch. It’s more like a long on-ramp. With a tollbooth. And potholes. And a guard station. And a giant electrified fence.</p><p>In their desire to find a compromise acceptable to the chronically short-sighted and self-destructive Republican Party, Democrats have crafted an immigration bill that is for the most part as unobjectionable as it is uninspired. The bill cobbles together a series of pragmatic concessions that, while perhaps sufficient to overcome conservative objections, will likely prove wholly insufficient at actually addressing the problem it was designed to solve — that is, fixing our broken immigration system. The tangle of hurdles and exclusions, loopholes for businesses and pitfalls for immigrants, is precisely the mess we should be cleaning up, not making worse.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/will_immigration_bill_be_a_replay_of_guns/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/will_immigration_bill_be_a_replay_of_guns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marco Rubio is giving away free phones too?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/marco_rubio_is_giving_away_free_phones_too/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/marco_rubio_is_giving_away_free_phones_too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 20:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laura Ingraham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative echo chamber]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13274145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservatives launch an attack on the Florida senator after fatally misreading a new immigration bill]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, at least wacky conservative rumor-mongers are fair, in their own peculiar way. They seem just as willing to fire their brain-dead artillery at members of their own party as they are at Obama.</p><p>Remember the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/why_is_the_right_so_worked_up_about_obama_phones/">"Obama phone"</a> -- the completely ridiculous right-wing obsession on the idea that the Obama administration was handing out free phones to welfare recipients? Which turned out actually to be a Reagan-era program that provided discounts to low-income phone users?</p><p>Well, now there's a <a href="http://shark-tank.net/2013/04/17/move-over-obama-phone-say-hola-to-the-marco-rubio-immigration-phone/">"Marco phone"</a> -- as in Sen. Marco Rubio, proponent of a new immigration bill filed this week.</p><p>The Florida politics website <a href=" http://shark-tank.net/2013/04/17/move-over-obama-phone-say-hola-to-the-marco-rubio-immigration-phone/">the Shark Tank</a> "reports":</p><blockquote><p>According to the newly filed bill, immigrants who are allowed to enter the United States under a work visa, will be "granted" a taxpayer funded cellular phone. Move over “Obama phone,” we present the new ‘Hola, Como Estas?!’ MarcoPhone.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/marco_rubio_is_giving_away_free_phones_too/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/marco_rubio_is_giving_away_free_phones_too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bipartisan immigration bill to be unveiled</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/bipartisan_immigration_bill_to_be_unveiled_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/bipartisan_immigration_bill_to_be_unveiled_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 12:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13272280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The legislation would put new focus on prospective immigrants' employment potential ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. immigration system would undergo dramatic changes under a bipartisan Senate bill that puts a new focus on prospective immigrants' merit and employment potential, while seeking to end illegal immigration once and for all by creating legal avenues for workers to come here.</p><p>The bill would put the 11 million immigrants in the country illegally on a 13-year path to U.S. citizenship that would cost each $2,000 in fines plus additional fees, and would begin only after steps have been taken to secure the border, according to an outline of the measure.</p><p>The sweeping legislation also would remake the nation's inefficient legal immigration system, creating new immigration opportunities for tens of thousands of high- and low-skilled workers, as well as a new "merit visa" aimed at bringing people with talents to the U.S. Senators had planned to formally introduce the bill Tuesday, but after Monday's bombing at the Boston Marathon a planned press event was delayed until later in the week.</p><p>Employers would face tough new requirements to check the legal status of all workers. Billions of dollars would be poured into border security, and millions of people who've been waiting overseas for years, sometimes decades, in legal immigration backlogs would see their cases speeded up.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/bipartisan_immigration_bill_to_be_unveiled_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/bipartisan_immigration_bill_to_be_unveiled_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sunday show roundup: Marco Rubio goes &#8220;full Ginsburg,&#8221; talks tough on immigration</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/14/sunday_show_roundup_marco_rubio_goes_full_ginsburg_talks_tough_on_immigration/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/14/sunday_show_roundup_marco_rubio_goes_full_ginsburg_talks_tough_on_immigration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2013 16:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gang of eight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13270458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rubio made the rounds on a record seven morning network shows to talk immigration while remaining fully hydrated]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) joined the ranks of <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/george_w_bushs_art_teacher_says_hell_go_down_in_the_history_books_as_a_great_artist/" target="_blank">famous artist</a> George W. Bush, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/michele_bachmann_runs_away_from_reporter/" target="_blank">marathon sprinter</a> Michelle Bachmann and others by going "full Ginsburg" on Sunday to promote the Gang of Eight immigration reform proposal. ("Full Ginsburg" is a reference to Monica Lewinsky lawyer William Ginsburg, who was the first to appear on all five of the major network shows on the same day.)</p><p>But Rubio did Ginsburg one better during his immigration reform-themed media blitz. Two better, actually.</p><p>In addition to appearances on NBC's "Meet the Press," CBS' "Face the Nation," ABC's "This Week," CNN's "State of the Union" and "Fox News Sunday," Rubio stopped by Univision and Telemundo to promote a bipartisan package and swear up and down that he was really, really not offering amnesty to more than 11 million undocumented immigrants.</p><p>A roundup of Rubio's tough talk on immigration.</p><p><strong>Rubio boasts to "This Week" that his reform package still makes it pretty hard to be an undocumented immigrant in America </strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/14/sunday_show_roundup_marco_rubio_goes_full_ginsburg_talks_tough_on_immigration/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/14/sunday_show_roundup_marco_rubio_goes_full_ginsburg_talks_tough_on_immigration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Immigration bill could exclude hundreds of thousands</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/immigration_bill_could_exclude_hundreds_of_thousands_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/immigration_bill_could_exclude_hundreds_of_thousands_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 11:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13268883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Legislation to be unveiled next week would bar newly arrived immigrants from applying for legal status]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — Bipartisan immigration legislation emerging in the Senate could prevent hundreds of thousands of immigrants in the U.S. illegally from ever becoming citizens, according to a Senate aide with knowledge of the proposals.</p><p>The bill expected to be unveiled next week would bar anyone who arrived in the U.S. after Dec. 31, 2011, from applying for legal status and ultimately citizenship, according to the aide, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the proposals had not been announced.</p><p>It also would require applicants to document that they were in the country before Dec. 31, 2011, have a clean criminal record, and show enough employment or financial stability that they're likely to stay off welfare.</p><p>Those requirements could end up excluding hundreds of thousands of the 11 million immigrants in the U.S. illegally from the path to citizenship envisioned by the bill, the aide said.</p><p>Although illegal immigration to the U.S. has been dropping, many tens of thousands still arrive each year, so the cutoff date alone could exclude a large number of people. That may come as a disappointment to immigrant rights groups that had been hoping that anyone here as of the date of enactment of the bill could be able to become eligible for citizenship.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/immigration_bill_could_exclude_hundreds_of_thousands_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/immigration_bill_could_exclude_hundreds_of_thousands_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate&#8217;s &#8220;Gang of Eight&#8221; reportedly reaches immigration deal</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/senates_gang_of_eight_reportedly_reaches_immigration_deal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/senates_gang_of_eight_reportedly_reaches_immigration_deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 13:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Undocumented immigrants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Schumer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13266712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The bipartisan group of senators will announce the deal within a week]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Senate's "Gang of Eight," which has been working toward a deal on immigration reform, has reportedly reached a deal and will announce it within a week.</p><p><a href="Aides said the legislative proposal could be released as soon as Thursday, but is more likely to be ready early next week. The schedule outlined by the aides is meant to satisfy Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), who has said repeatedly that he wants a full debate and amendment process, to maximize the chances that the final vote is an overwhelming majority.  Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/04/senates-gang-of-eight-immigration-deal-89832.html#ixzz2Q4BKMuT5">Politico</a> reports:</p><blockquote><p>Aides said the legislative proposal could be released as soon as Thursday, but is more likely to be ready early next week. The schedule outlined by the aides is meant to satisfy Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), who has said repeatedly that he wants a full debate and amendment process, to maximize the chances that the final vote is an overwhelming majority.</p></blockquote><p>The <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323820304578413063272797112.html?mod=WSJ_hps_LEFTTopStories">Wall Street Journal</a> has some possible details on the framework, which, according to unnamed sources, would require strict border security measures to be enforced before undocumented immigrants can begin receiving green cards:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/senates_gang_of_eight_reportedly_reaches_immigration_deal/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/senates_gang_of_eight_reportedly_reaches_immigration_deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beyoncé and Jay-Z trip to Cuba reportedly licensed by U.S. Treasury</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/beyonce_and_jay_z_trip_to_cuba_reportedly_licensed_by_u_s_treasury/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/beyonce_and_jay_z_trip_to_cuba_reportedly_licensed_by_u_s_treasury/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beyonce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay-Z]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[us treasury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13265650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The GOP continues its inquiry into the stars' vacation to an island where U.S. tourism is prohibited]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The GOP continues to question how celebrity couple Beyoncé and Jay-Z were allowed to visit Cuba, a country that the US has restricted tourism to for over 50 years. Although Obama loosened American travel restrictions to allow educational and cultural visits in recent years, media reports indicate that the celebrity couple went on vacation to celebrate their fifth wedding anniversary.</p><p>Prompted by <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/gop_congressmen_challenge_beyonce_and_jay_zs_visit_to_cuba/">inquiries</a> into the trip from Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen and Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart, sources have come forward to say that the US Treasury sanctioned the visit. From <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2013/apr/09/beyonce-jay-z-cuba-us-treasury">the Guardian</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/beyonce_and_jay_z_trip_to_cuba_reportedly_licensed_by_u_s_treasury/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/beyonce_and_jay_z_trip_to_cuba_reportedly_licensed_by_u_s_treasury/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rubio isn&#8217;t immigration reform&#8217;s only potential saboteur</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/rubio_isnt_immigration_reforms_only_potential_saboteur/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/rubio_isnt_immigration_reforms_only_potential_saboteur/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 11:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Schumer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13258417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before Chuck Schumer pops the champagne, he's got to deal with senator's delay tactics and a Republican House]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NBC News' <a href="http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/04/01/17552059-first-thoughts-aprils-shower-of-activity-on-capitol-hill?lite">"First Read" yesterday</a> crowed about an "April's shower of activity on Capitol Hill," as Congress defied its recent history of gridlock and ... made gradual, grudging process on negotiations on various initiatives that might eventually turn into bills that might eventually pass. The brightest spot of news was on immigration reform. Over the weekend, we heard that "labor and business" (that is, the AFL-CIO and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce) had reached a mutually agreeable compromise on guest workers. On Sunday, "Gang of Eight" member Chuck Schumer all but promised that reform would happen, and happen soon. Then, Sen. Marco Rubio, a member of that gang, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/what_is_marco_rubio_up_to/">publicly announced his intention to slow everything down.</a></p><p>Rubio <a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2013/04/01/_real_hearings_the_search_for_another_scapegoat_if_conservatives_want_to.html">sent a letter to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Pat Leahy</a> in which he demanded more hearings. So, so many hearings. (Rubio's letter contained the word "hearings" six times.) And open amendments, which is basically asking permission for anti-reform senators to attempt to make a series of potentially toxic votes if they want their precious reform.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/rubio_isnt_immigration_reforms_only_potential_saboteur/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/rubio_isnt_immigration_reforms_only_potential_saboteur/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is Marco Rubio up to?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/what_is_marco_rubio_up_to/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/what_is_marco_rubio_up_to/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 19:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latinos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Schumer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13258102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He wants credit with Latinos for brokering an immigration reform deal, and with the Tea Party for slowing it down]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was the mystery left in the wake of the Sunday shows: Just before Sen. Chuck Schumer was set to tell “Meet the Press” that the so-called Gang of Eight is on the verge of a deal on immigration reform, Sen. Marco Rubio sent out a statement headlined,  <a href=" http://www.politico.com/story/2013/03/marco-rubio-reports-of-immigration-deal-premature-89493.html#ixzz2PEf2qFxp">“Rubio: No Final Agreement on Immigration Legislation Yet.”</a> It read, in part, “Reports that the bipartisan group of eight senators have agreed on a legislative proposal are premature."</p><p>Schumer went ahead and kvelled about being close to a deal, anyway. “With the agreement between business and labor, every major policy issue has been resolved on the ‘Gang of Eight,’” he told NBC’s Chuck Todd. A GOP Gang member, Sen. Jeff Flake of Arizona, sounded more cautiously optimistic. "We're much closer with labor and business agreeing on this guest-worker plan," Flake told Todd. "But that doesn't mean we've crossed every 'I' or dotted every 'T' or vice versa." They were referring to a deal on the status of low-skilled immigrant workers brokered Friday night by AFL-CIO president Richard Trumka and U.S. Chamber of Commerce head Tom Donohue.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/what_is_marco_rubio_up_to/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/what_is_marco_rubio_up_to/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rand Paul wins the first day of right-wing confab</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/rand_paul_wins_the_first_day_of_cpac/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/rand_paul_wins_the_first_day_of_cpac/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 18:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpac 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Filibuster]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13229264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After his speech extolling limited government, the libertarian senator is blowing Marco Rubio out of the water]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rand Paul’s 13-hour filibuster on the drone program has turned him into a superstar here at CPAC, where red and black “Stand With Rand” stickers and T-shirts -- <a href="http://washingtonexaminer.com/stand-with-rand-volunteers-promoting-sen.-rand-paul-at-cpac/article/2524310">distributed by</a> an organization founded by his father -- can be spotted on one of every six or seven people milling around outside the main ballroom, especially on the younger folks.</p><p>“That filibuster was the best move by a politician I’ve ever seen,” a high school senior from Virginia with a swept bowl-cut (who has seen a lot of moves in his time) exclaimed when asked about his sticker.</p><p>When Paul himself took the stage inside, the audience roared in approbation and many stood for the duration of the speech to physically show their support. Paul played the hits right off the back, opening with a joke about his now iconic filibuster. “I was told I get 10 measly minutes, but I came prepared with 13 hours' worth of material!” he said while holding up a stack of black binders. “Don’t drone me, bro!” a young man yelled approvingly from the crowd.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/rand_paul_wins_the_first_day_of_cpac/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/rand_paul_wins_the_first_day_of_cpac/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rubio at CPAC: Liberals are &#8220;freeloaders&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/rubio_at_cpac_science_has_proven_that_life_begins_at_conception/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/rubio_at_cpac_science_has_proven_that_life_begins_at_conception/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 17:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13229126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a rousing CPAC speech, Rubio mocks climate change, says life begins at conception, and declares he's not a bigot]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., offered up a serving of red meat to the audience at CPAC, reiterating his support for "traditional marriage," calling liberals "freeloaders," and stating his opposition to tax increases and abortion. "Science has proven that life begins at conception," he told the cheering crowd.</p><p>"Just because I want to define marriage in a traditional way does not make me a bigot," Rubio said, adding: "Just because I believe that life, all life, at all stages of development, deserves to be protected," does not make him closed-minded.</p><p>"The people who are closed-minded in our society are the ones who love to preach about climate science" but ignore that "science has proven that life begins at conception."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/rubio_at_cpac_science_has_proven_that_life_begins_at_conception/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/rubio_at_cpac_science_has_proven_that_life_begins_at_conception/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>109</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rubio and Paul&#8217;s CPAC showdown</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/rubio_and_pauls_cpac_showdown/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/rubio_and_pauls_cpac_showdown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 13:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13227575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Get ready for more 2016 speculation]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sens. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., and Rand Paul, R-Ky., will give back-to-back speeches at the Conservative Political Action Conference on Thursday, which will no doubt fuel the speculation about a potential showdown over the White House in 2016.</p><p>From <a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/287785-cpac-showdown-rubio-and-paul-to-give-dueling-speeches">The Hill</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) will speak to the annual Conservative Political Action Conference at 1:15 p.m. on the event’s opening day. Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) will follow 15 minutes later.</p> <p>The conference double-header gives the CPAC audience its first chance to directly compare and contrast two ambitious lawmakers who have found early-career success as favorites of Tea Party Republicans.</p></blockquote><p>Each senator is fresh off giving another high-profile speech that set them up as a potential Republican candidate in the next presidential race: Rubio with his rebuttal to the President's State of the Union, and Paul with his filibuster of John Brennan's nomination to CIA chief.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/rubio_and_pauls_cpac_showdown/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/rubio_and_pauls_cpac_showdown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>