<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > mark burnett</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/mark_burnett/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 12:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Barack Obama doppelganger plays Satan in &#8220;Bible&#8221; miniseries: Conservatives react</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/barack_obama_doppelganger_plays_satan_in_bible_miniseries_conservatives_react/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/barack_obama_doppelganger_plays_satan_in_bible_miniseries_conservatives_react/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history channel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mark burnett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roma downey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13244546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The high-rated miniseries "The Bible" features an Obama look-alike as Beelzebub; the right sees the resemblance!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The History Channel has had a smash hit with "The Bible," a miniseries dramatizing the Good Book -- the premiere episode garnered 13.10 million viewers. That audience, last night, got their first peek at the Devil -- played by Mohamen Mehdi Ouazanni, an actor with a strong resemblance to President Barack Obama.</p><p>Glenn Beck was among the first to pick up the resemblance:</p><p>[embedtweet id="313120671297306624"]</p><p>The hashtag #ObamaSatan has taken off among conservative Twitter users:</p><p>[embedtweet id="313673168348930048"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="313676128210522112"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="313672814911684608"]</p><p>The idea of the president -- any president -- being a biblical force for evil is not a new one: <a href="http://www.wnd.com/2001/02/8270/">WorldNetDaily</a> called Bill Clinton "the Antichrist" in 2001, urging readers: "Reject him. Reject the mark of the beast." It's part and parcel of the swirling conspiracy theories that surround anyone in a position of power.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/barack_obama_doppelganger_plays_satan_in_bible_miniseries_conservatives_react/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/barack_obama_doppelganger_plays_satan_in_bible_miniseries_conservatives_react/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>84</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is &#8220;The Bible&#8221; comfort TV?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/06/the_bible_terrible_tv_for_evangelicals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/06/the_bible_terrible_tv_for_evangelicals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 19:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the history channel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mark burnett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Survivor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jesus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evangelicals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13220699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Survivor" producer Mark Burnett's retelling of the Bible is a ratings smash. Too bad it stinks to high heaven]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first part of the History Channel’s miniseries “The Bible” was watched by <a href="http://www.vulture.com/2013/03/ye-gods-vikings-are-massive-hits.html">13.1 million people on Sunday night</a>. This is a huge number, another shiv in the guts of network television. As the New York Times noted, it is double the number of viewers who <a href="http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/03/04/the-bible-on-history-reaches-13-1-million-viewers/">watched anything on NBC last month</a>, and even more people than watch “The Walking Dead,” another cable show that makes network TV executives drool.</p><p>The success of “The Bible” is and is not surprising. That’s a huge audience, and a huge audience for a bad series — plodding, stiff, dull, God-is-a-white-guy-with-sandy-blond-hair kind of bad. But it has been demonstrated before that there is a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Passion_of_the_Christ">huge market</a> for religious-based, <a href="http://www.vulture.com/2011/10/your_box_office_explained_10.html">evangelical-leaning</a> entertainments, of which “The Bible” is clearly one. (Mark Burnett, the producer of “Survivor” and a very canny finder of eyeballs, is one of the series’ producers.) Part of the reason the series is so middling is that it is explicitly constructed not to offend this demographic: It isn’t even serious about all of the crises of faith chronicled in the actual Bible, because that would require elucidating ... crises of faith.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/06/the_bible_terrible_tv_for_evangelicals/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/06/the_bible_terrible_tv_for_evangelicals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>175</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
