<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Mark Sanford</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/mark_sanford/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 14:53:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The week in 10 pics</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/11/the_week_in_10_pics_12/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/11/the_week_in_10_pics_12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slideshow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The week in 10 pics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dhaka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bangladesh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleveland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Ramsey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jodi Arias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ariel Castro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Sanford]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13295407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chilling mug shots, wild press conferences and inspiring rescues: A look at the week's most lasting images]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Chilling mug shots, wild press conferences and inspiring rescues: A look at the week's most lasting images]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/11/the_week_in_10_pics_12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mark Sanford settles trespassing complaint</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/mark_sanford_settles_trespassing_complaint/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/mark_sanford_settles_trespassing_complaint/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 13:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Sanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jenny sanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Colbert-Busch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13293657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sanford's ex-wife had accused him of repeatedly violating the terms of their divorce agreement]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fresh off his win in the South Carolina special election, Mark Sanford has overcome another obstacle by settling a trespassing complaint made against him by his ex-wife, Jenny Sanford.</p><p>From the <a href="http://www.thestate.com/2013/05/08/2762398/new-congressman-sanford-ex-wife.html">Associated Press</a>:</p><blockquote><p>As part of Wednesday's deal, he admits he violated the agreement on Feb. 3 and on other occasions.</p> <p>Under the consent order signed by both parties, a family court judge will withhold sentencing as long as Sanford abides by the provisions of their 2010 divorce decree that says neither party may enter the other's home without permission.</p></blockquote><div></div><p>Sanford also agreed to pay $5000 to Jenny Sanford in legal fees.</p><p>Jenny Sanford had <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/mark_sanford_accused_of_trespassing_by_ex_wife/">filed</a> multiple complaints against her ex-husband, saying that he ”entered into a pattern of entering onto plaintiff’s property. Plaintiff has informed defendant on a number of occasions that this behavior is in violation of the court’s order and has demanded that it not occur again.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/mark_sanford_settles_trespassing_complaint/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/mark_sanford_settles_trespassing_complaint/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The truly worrying thing about Mark Sanford&#8217;s win</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/the_truly_worrying_thing_about_the_mark_sanford_win/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/the_truly_worrying_thing_about_the_mark_sanford_win/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 11:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Sanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Colbert-Busch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13292319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adultery is the least offensive thing about our newest member of Congress]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark Sanford, the former governor of South Carolina whose adulterous relationship was very strange and amusing, won a special election to the U.S. House of Representatives yesterday. And What Does It Mean? Not much. It means Mark Sanford is just palatable enough to win by 9 points in a district where, in 2012, Republican Tim Scott beat his Democratic opponent 62 percent to 36 percent. Mitt Romney won the district by 18 points. <a href="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/cspg/smartpolitics/2013/05/democrats_hit_the_wall_again_i.php">Democrats haven't picked up a Republican-held seat in South Carolina in 25 years.</a></p><p>The Washington Post's Chris Cillizza has it figured out:</p><p>[embedtweet id="331933173602738177"]</p><p>Yes, underperforming for a Republican in a heavily Republican district, in a special election, is definitely proof that Sanford was a superior candidate, and not merely that he had an R by his name. If anything, Sanford's victory proves that candidates matter only in terms of ideology, not biography. In a very conservative district, the Republican candidate will win, even if he's a weird creep with a humiliating past.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/the_truly_worrying_thing_about_the_mark_sanford_win/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/the_truly_worrying_thing_about_the_mark_sanford_win/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>70</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The futility of the Deep South Democrat</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/the_futility_of_the_deep_south_democrat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/the_futility_of_the_deep_south_democrat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Sanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Colbert-Busch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The South]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13292525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark Sanford was probably never beatable, and the reason dates back about 50 years]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a certain futility to Elizabeth Colbert Busch’s congressional campaign, one that had nothing to do with her and everything to do with the state and region she calls home.</p><p>When a poll a few weeks ago put her ahead of former Gov. Mark Sanford by 9 points in South Carolina’s 1st District special election, Democrats perked up at the prospect of an unlikely victory in the heart of Dixie. But there was <a href="http://www.newrepublic.com/article/113134/mark-sanford-elizabeth-colbert-busch-special-election-toss">reason to be skeptical</a> of that poll, and when the votes were tallied Tuesday night reality asserted itself quickly, with Sanford posting a relatively easy <a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/files/elections/2013/by_county/SC_Page_0507.html?SITE=CSPANELN&amp;SECTION=POLITICS">54-45 percent win</a>.</p><p>In hindsight, no one should be surprised. There’s plenty of chatter this morning about <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/05/mark-sanford-win-91049.html?hp=t1_3">supposed turning</a> points in the race, dramatic moments when Sanford snatched the momentum from his Democratic opponent and won over reluctant swing voters. But who knows if Sanford was ever really trailing by that much in the first place. More likely, the SC-1 special election is simply the latest example of white voters in the South – and particularly the Deep South – doing what they almost always do these days: vote Republican.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/the_futility_of_the_deep_south_democrat/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/the_futility_of_the_deep_south_democrat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>126</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sanford wins special election in South Carolina</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/sanford_wins_special_election_in_south_carolina/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/sanford_wins_special_election_in_south_carolina/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 01:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Sanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Colbert-Busch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13292255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Former governor wins solidly Republican district in race viewed as competitive due to his past indiscretions]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a local race that drew national attention, former South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford defeated Democratic nominee Elizabeth Colbert-Busch Tuesday night in a special election for the state's first Congressional seat. The Associated Press called the race early in the evening with returns showing Sanford leading by a margin of 54 to 46 percent.</p><p>The Washington Post <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/05/07/mark-sanford-wins-south-carolina-special-election/?hpid=z1">reports</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Mitt Romney won this district by 18 points last fall, but Sanford’s personal history made the seat competitive. Democrats <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/05/07/elizabeth-colbert-buschs-big-time-financial-advantage-in-two-charts/">poured money into the race</a> while national Republicans abandoned their candidate, giving Colbert Busch a 5-to-1 advantage in outside spending.</p> <p>Those ads, and Colbert Busch herself, made an issue out of Sanford’s 2009 disappearance to be with his Argentinean mistress, which led to an ethics investigation into his travel.</p> <p>In spite of that cash and a <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/04/17/sanford-ex-wifes-trespassing-complaint-an-unfortunate-reality-of-divorce/">trespassing complaint</a> filed by Sanford’s ex-wife in the 48 hours before the election, he was <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/mark-sanford-might-actually-win-south-carolina-seat/2013/05/05/bfea35b6-b589-11e2-b94c-b684dda07add_story_1.html">gaining momentum</a>. Throughout the race he tied Colbert Busch to national Democrats and emphasized his own fiscal conservatism, an ultimately successful strategy.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/sanford_wins_special_election_in_south_carolina/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/sanford_wins_special_election_in_south_carolina/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DOJ to monitor South Carolina election</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/doj_to_monitor_south_carolina_elections/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/doj_to_monitor_south_carolina_elections/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 20:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Sanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Colbert-Busch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13291774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Justice Department will oversee Tuesday's race under the provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Justice Department announced that it will monitor Tuesday's special election in South Carolina between Mark Sanford and Elizabeth Colbert-Busch, under the provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.</p><p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/06/us-usa-politics-southcarolina-monitors-idUSBRE9450RO20130506">Reuters</a> reports:</p><blockquote><p>The Justice Department said in a statement it was monitoring the election under provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. The law bars election discrimination on the basis of race, color or membership in a minority language group.</p> <p>The department did not give a reason for the monitoring. Tuesday's vote will take place under South Carolina's new law mandating photo identification for voters, and Justice Department monitors observed primary elections.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/doj_to_monitor_south_carolina_elections/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/doj_to_monitor_south_carolina_elections/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How the creep Mark Sanford might actually win</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/can_mark_sanford_actually_win/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/can_mark_sanford_actually_win/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Sanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Colbert-Busch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adultery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13291262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adultery, abandoning his office, mock-hijacking a reporter's car. And yet: Not being a Democrat might trump it all]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that my opinion matters much in South Carolina’s first congressional district, but Mark Sanford strikes me as rather loopy, and somewhat creepy. Yet he may well win his race against Elizabeth Colbert-Busch on Tuesday. Local conservatives apparently despise Nancy Pelosi and Barack Obama more than the Republicans who flagrantly violate so-called family values.</p><p>National Republicans nominally abandoned Sanford after it became public that he was being sued by his ex-wife Jenny for violating a no-trespassing order at her home – to watch the Super Bowl with his son, he claimed – on top of that small matter of violating his oath of office as governor when he disappeared for five days to be with his Argentine mistress (now his fiancée) back in 2009, on the taxpayer’s dime.</p><p>Sanford fell 9 points behind Colbert-Busch in a PPP poll after the trespassing revelation (more on that possibly flawed poll later), but he’s a point ahead in the latest PPP survey, and could very well win.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/can_mark_sanford_actually_win/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/can_mark_sanford_actually_win/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>93</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anti-Colbert Busch push polls reported in South Carolina</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/anti_colbert_busch_push_polls_reported_in_south_carolina/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/anti_colbert_busch_push_polls_reported_in_south_carolina/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 16:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Colbert-Busch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Sanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Push polling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13286689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“What would you think of Elizabeth Colbert Busch if I told you she had had an abortion?” one call reportedly asked]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>South Carolina's special election just got a little bit dirtier, with a conservative group reportedly using push polls -- phone calls disguised as polls, but aimed at influencing voters -- to dissuade voters from supporting Democrat Elizabeth Colbert Busch.</p><p>According to ThinkProgress, multiple individuals in the state have reported receiving phone calls from the shady conservative group “SSI Polling," which claims to be polling on the race between Colbert Busch and Mark Sanford, but does not mention Sanford at all in the calls.</p><p>According to <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2013/05/01/1945751/south-carolina-push-poll/?mobile=nc">ThinkProgress</a>, some of the questions were:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/anti_colbert_busch_push_polls_reported_in_south_carolina/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/anti_colbert_busch_push_polls_reported_in_south_carolina/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Colbert Busch goes there in debate with Sanford</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/colbert_busch_goes_there_in_debate_with_sanford_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/colbert_busch_goes_there_in_debate_with_sanford_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 11:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Sanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Colbert-Busch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13285446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Democratic candidate reminded her Republican counterpart he used taxpayer funds to finance his affair]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CHARLESTON, S.C. (AP) -- Republican Mark Sanford and Democrat Elizabeth Colbert Busch planned to hit the campaign trail a day after a spirited debate in their race for a vacant congressional seat along the South Carolina coast.</p><p>"I rocked it," Colbert Busch said following Monday's 75-minute debate before an audience of about 500 at The Citadel, which was telecast on C-SPAN. Sanford, a former two-term governor trying to revive a political career damaged by an extramarital affair, said he would let the pundits decide who won.</p><p>With Election Day just a week away, both have separate appearances Tuesday, then appear before a Charleston Metro Chamber of Commerce group on the city's waterfront before attending a forum sponsored by the Goose Creek NAACP. During both appearances, the candidates will address attendees but won't debate.</p><p>They did debate Monday, before a lively audience where supporters frequently broke into shouts or applause.</p><p>Early on, Colbert Busch, the sister of political satirist Stephen Colbert, reminded Sanford that he once used taxpayer funds to "leave the country for a personal purpose" - referring to the extramarital affair with an Argentine woman he had while governor. In general, Colbert Busch has refused to bring up Sanford's personal past during the campaign.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/colbert_busch_goes_there_in_debate_with_sanford_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/colbert_busch_goes_there_in_debate_with_sanford_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll: Sanford trails Colbert-Busch by nine points</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/poll_sanford_trails_colbert_busch_by_nine_points/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/poll_sanford_trails_colbert_busch_by_nine_points/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 12:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Sanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Colbert-Busch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jenny sanford]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13279487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After revelations that Sanford's ex-wife filed a trespassing complaint against him, he's taken a hit in the polls]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new poll from the Democratic-leaning <a href="http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/PPP_Release_SC_422.pdf">Public Policy Polling</a> finds that Mark Sanford is now trailing his Democratic opponent Elizabeth Colbert-Busch by nine points, by a margin of 50-41 percent.</p><p>From the poll:</p><blockquote><p>Colbert Busch's lead is on the rise for several reasons. She has a 51/35 advantage with independents. She's winning over 19% of Republicans, while losing just 7% of Democrats. And it also seems that after last week's revelations about Sanford that a lot of GOP voters are planning to just stay at home- while the district supported Mitt Romney by 18 points last fall, those planning to turn out for the special election voted for him by only a 5 point spread.</p></blockquote><p>Last week's revelations involve the reportedly <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/more_problems_for_mark_sanford/">multiple complaints</a> filed by Jenny Sanford, Mark Sanford's ex-wife, accusing him of trespassing and violating the terms of their divorce.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/poll_sanford_trails_colbert_busch_by_nine_points/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/poll_sanford_trails_colbert_busch_by_nine_points/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>National Dems attack Sanford with &#8220;Appalachian Trail&#8221; ad</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/national_dems_attack_sanford_with_appalachian_trail_ad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/national_dems_attack_sanford_with_appalachian_trail_ad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 20:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Sanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DCCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Colbert-Busch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appalachian Trail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13275447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The DCCC launched an ad in South Carolina that focuses on Mark Sanford's affair]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>National Democrats have waded into Mark Sanford's congressional race, launching an attack ad that references the "Appalachian Trail" and Sanford's affair during his time as governor of South Carolina.</p><p>The ad, called "A Walk," shows someone hiking through the woods, meant to signify "hiking the Appalachian Trail," or what Sanford staffers said he was doing when he disappeared from the state in 2009 and went to Argentina for an affair. Sanford "walked out on us, violated our trust, secretly used thousands of taxpayer dollars flying to Argentina and then lied about it," the ad says.</p><p>"Sanford paid the largest ethics fine in state history. Now he wants our trust again? Maybe Mark Sanford should just keep walking," it continues.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/national_dems_attack_sanford_with_appalachian_trail_ad/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/national_dems_attack_sanford_with_appalachian_trail_ad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More problems for Mark Sanford</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/more_problems_for_mark_sanford/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/more_problems_for_mark_sanford/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 13:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Sanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jenny sanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Colbert-Busch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Concerned Women for America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRCC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13274989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jenny Sanford has filed multiple complaints against her ex-husband, claiming he violated the terms of the divorce]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark Sanford's congressional campaign has taken a number of hits this week, beginning with revelations that his ex-wife <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/mark_sanford_accused_of_trespassing_by_ex_wife/">filed</a> a trespassing complaint against him. Now comes the news that Jenny Sanford has filed three others against him as well.</p><p>According to documents obtained by <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/04/17/mark-sanfords-ex-wife-has-filed-multiple-complaints-against-him/">The Washington Post</a>:</p><blockquote><p>According to documents obtained by the Washington Post, Jenny Sanford filed a complaint against Mark Sanford in March 2012 for violating the terms of having their sons on the Sanford family’s Coosaw plantation. The terms state that “no airplanes will be flown at the children.”</p> <p>She has also accused him of failing to properly insure the property and of missing a child support payment. Jenny Sanford told AP the latter situation has been resolved.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/more_problems_for_mark_sanford/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/more_problems_for_mark_sanford/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NRCC drops Mark Sanford</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/nrcc_drops_mark_sanford/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/nrcc_drops_mark_sanford/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 18:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Sanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jenny sanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13273885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The decision is reportedly due to revelations that Sanford's ex-wife filed a trespassing complaint against him]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NRCC is backing away from the congressional campaign of former South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford, reportedly after revelations that Sanford's ex-wife filed a trespassing complaint against him.</p><p><a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/04/mark-sanford-nrcc-90217.html">Politico</a> reports:</p><blockquote><p>Blindsided by news that Sanford’s ex-wife has accused him of trespassing and concluding he has no plausible path to victory, the National Republican Congressional Committee has decided not to spend more money on Sanford’s behalf ahead of the May 7 special election.</p> <p id="continue">“Mark Sanford has proven he knows what it takes to win elections. At this time, the NRCC will not be engaged in this special election,” said Andrea Bozek, an NRCC spokeswoman.</p> </blockquote><p>The decision by the NRCC comes the same day the Associated Press reported that Jenny Sanford, Mark Sanford's ex-wife, filed a trespassing complaint that <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/mark_sanford_accused_of_trespassing_by_ex_wife/">accused</a> him of ”enter[ing] into a pattern of entering onto plaintiff’s property. Plaintiff has informed defendant on a number of occasions that this behavior is in violation of the court’s order and has demanded that it not occur again.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/nrcc_drops_mark_sanford/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/nrcc_drops_mark_sanford/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mark Sanford&#8217;s ex-wife accuses him of trespassing</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/mark_sanford_accused_of_trespassing_by_ex_wife/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/mark_sanford_accused_of_trespassing_by_ex_wife/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 13:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Sanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jenny sanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Colbert-Busch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13273580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jenny Sanford filed a complaint against Sanford, who must now appear in court right after the election]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former governor Mark Sanford will appear in court for two days after his ex-wife accused him of trespassing, according to a complaint obtained by the <a href="http://bigstory.ap.org/article/ap-ex-wife-says-former-sc-gov-sanford-trespassed">Associated Press</a>.</p><p>From the AP:</p><blockquote><p>The complaint says Jenny Sanford confronted Sanford leaving her Sullivans Island home on Feb. 3 by a rear door, using his cell phone for a flashlight. Her attorney filed the complaint the next day and Jenny Sanford confirmed Tuesday the documents are authentic.</p> <p>The couple's 2010 divorce settlement says neither may enter the other's home without permission. Mark Sanford lives about a 20-minute drive away in downtown Charleston.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/mark_sanford_accused_of_trespassing_by_ex_wife/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/mark_sanford_accused_of_trespassing_by_ex_wife/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ex-wife of Mark Sanford claims he trespassed</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/ex_wife_of_mark_sanford_claims_he_trespassed_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/ex_wife_of_mark_sanford_claims_he_trespassed_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 11:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Sanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jenny sanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charleston]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13273544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former South Carolina governor must appear in court to answer the complaint]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CHARLESTON, S.C. (AP) — Former South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford must appear in court two days after running for a vacant congressional seat to answer a complaint that he trespassed at his ex-wife's home, according to court documents acquired by The Associated Press on Tuesday.</p><p>The complaint says Jenny Sanford confronted Sanford leaving her Sullivans Island home on Feb. 3 by a rear door, using his cell phone for a flashlight. Her attorney filed the complaint the next day and Jenny Sanford confirmed Tuesday the documents are authentic.</p><p>The couple's 2010 divorce settlement says neither may enter the other's home without permission. Mark Sanford lives about a 20-minute drive away in downtown Charleston.</p><p>Republican Mark Sanford is trying to revive his political career that was derailed by an extramarital affair that ended the couple's marriage. He faces Democrat Elizabeth Colbert Busch on May 7 as he tries to regain the 1st District congressional seat he held for three terms in the 1990s.</p><p>Spokesman Joel Sawyer said the Sanford campaign had no immediate comment on the court documents.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/ex_wife_of_mark_sanford_claims_he_trespassed_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/ex_wife_of_mark_sanford_claims_he_trespassed_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP’s backward sexual politics</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/gop%e2%80%99s_backward_sexual_politics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/gop%e2%80%99s_backward_sexual_politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Vitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eliot spitzer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Weiner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Sanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adultery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13265320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The party’s “war on women” continues, but now it’s being fought with antiquated weapons]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Long before Gov. Eliot Spitzer and Sen. David Vitter, Abraham Lincoln paid prostitutes. And he contracted syphilis. Long before -- and here you can supply whichever name comes to mind first -- James A. Garfield was a great womanizer, who told his wife (repeatedly) that it would never happen again. The two presidents did not have to face the press and answer questions about their private conduct –- and it’s not because they were assassinated first. Nineteenth-century voters did not know national politicians in the intimate way we’re getting to know the private predilections of ours. So while it’s true that the media of that time didn’t stalk candidates in the ravenous manner it’s done today, in most other respects, the moral definitions of the 19th century are still very much with us, and we seem oblivious. It’s not just the 1950s the Republicans wish to return to -- they’re actually stuck in the 19th century.</p><p>Sexual politics are changing, but we don’t see it happening. Gay marriage acceptance is one -– right now, very noticeable -– part of it. We are at a turning point, with or without a Hillary Clinton presidency. In her new, attention-grabbing book, "Lean In," Sheryl Sandberg points out how backward our country remains insofar as women are still being evaluated by more rigorous standards, and men are still given to commit acts that would not be tolerated from women occupying the same position.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/gop%e2%80%99s_backward_sexual_politics/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/gop%e2%80%99s_backward_sexual_politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>64</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mark Sanford: Stephen Colbert&#8217;s not on the ticket</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/mark_sanford_stephen_colberts_not_on_the_ticket/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/mark_sanford_stephen_colberts_not_on_the_ticket/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 13:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Sanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Colbert Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Colbert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Colbert-Busch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13259843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sanford said Elizabeth Colbert-Busch's success in the polls right now is based on "name and ID"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After winning a runoff race for the Republican nomination for Congress in South Carolina, former Gov. Mark Sanford said he's not worried that his Democratic opponent, Elizabeth Colbert-Busch, has the backing of her famous brother.</p><p>"Well, you know, at the end of the day, Stephen Colbert's a very popular, you know, well-regarded comedian, but at the end of the day he's not on the ticket," Sanford said on MSNBC on Wednesday, according to <a href="http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/mark-sanford-stephen-colbert-isnt-on-ticket">TPM</a>.</p><p>Addressing an internal <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/colbert_to_hold_two_fundraisers_for_his_sisters_campaign/">poll</a> from Colbert-Busch's campaign that shows her with a slight lead, Sanford said: "[W]e're going to have a debate about ideas, and I think that when people really begin to digest those ideas, some real strong contrasts in terms of where she would be vs. where I would be, I think that will substantially change a poll that I think now simply defines name and ID as people know it, not issue ID. And I think ultimately debates in campaigns are decided on issues."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/mark_sanford_stephen_colberts_not_on_the_ticket/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/mark_sanford_stephen_colberts_not_on_the_ticket/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s on: Sanford to face Colbert Busch for South Carolina House seat</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/its_on_sanford_to_face_colbert_busch_for_south_carolina_house_seat_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/its_on_sanford_to_face_colbert_busch_for_south_carolina_house_seat_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 11:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Sanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Colbert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Colbert-Busch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13259804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sanford defeated former Charleston County Councilman Curtis Bostic in the GOP primary runoff Tuesday]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MOUNT PLEASANT, S.C. (AP) — The race for a vacant South Carolina congressional seat has turned into the big-name contest that political junkies were hoping for.</p><p>Former South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford, a Republican trying to make a comeback after his political career was derailed by his admission of an extramarital affair, faces Democrat Elizabeth Colbert Busch, the sister of political satirist Stephen Colbert, in a May 7 special election.</p><p>Sanford defeated former Charleston County Councilman Curtis Bostic in the GOP primary runoff Tuesday, clearing another hurdle in his quest for political redemption. He finished first last month in a 16-candidate field in the primary in the state's 1st Congressional District, which runs northeast along the coast from Hilton Head Island through Charleston and to the Georgetown County line.</p><p>Colbert Busch — who once worked in Washington as an intern for then-U.S. Senator Ernest "Fritz" Hollings, D-S.C. — has had a lifelong dream of running for public office. The businesswoman has said jobs is a top priority for her campaign. Colbert Busch has worked in the shipping industry for years and is now on a leave of absence from her position as the director of business development for Clemson University's Wind Turbine Drive Testing Facility.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/its_on_sanford_to_face_colbert_busch_for_south_carolina_house_seat_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/its_on_sanford_to_face_colbert_busch_for_south_carolina_house_seat_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Colbert to hold two fundraisers for his sister&#8217;s campaign</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/colbert_to_hold_two_fundraisers_for_his_sisters_campaign/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/colbert_to_hold_two_fundraisers_for_his_sisters_campaign/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 13:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Colbert Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Colbert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Colbert-Busch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Sanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13258660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Polls show Elizabeth Colbert Busch is in a tight race with Mark Sanford]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen Colbert will hold two fundraisers to raise money for his sister's campaign for Congress in South Carolina, in which she will likely face former Gov. Mark Sanford.</p><p><a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/04/stephen-colbert-hosting-fundraisers-for-his-sister-89524.html?hp=f2">Politico</a> reports:</p><blockquote> <p id="continue">An event in Washington featuring the Comedy Central host is scheduled for April 15, while Colbert and former investment banker Sallie Krawcheck will host a New York City event April 23; that event will be at Krawcheck’s home.</p> <p>For the D.C. event, a minimum donation of $2,600 is required to attend the private reception, while general admission tickets to the fundraiser cost $500.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/colbert_to_hold_two_fundraisers_for_his_sisters_campaign/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/colbert_to_hold_two_fundraisers_for_his_sisters_campaign/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why is Sanford&#8217;s comeback easier than others&#8217;?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/why_was_sanfords_comeback_easier_than_others/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/why_was_sanfords_comeback_easier_than_others/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 20:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Sanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Weiner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eliot spitzer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Scandal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13246787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scandal-plagued pols like Weiner and Spitzer are struggling for a comeback, but Sanford's been favored all along]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disgraced former Gov. Mark Sanford came out ahead in the South Carolina primary Tuesday night, and is the favorite to win the run-off for the nomination and the special election for the seat. But just a few years ago, Sanford was at a low point, giving a tearful press conference and addressing his hike on the "Appalachian Trail," which turned out to be a cover for an affair.</p><p>So what is it about Sanford that made him so forgivable, while politicians like <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/metropolis/2013/03/15/anthony-weiner-spends-campaign-funds-on-polling/">Anthony Weiner</a> and <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/dinapoli-weakness-spitzer-gain-article-1.1260280">Eliot Spitzer</a> have not been?</p><p>One theory is that in New York, the tabloid culture is so pervasive and persistent that it made it much harder for Spitzer and Weiner to survive after their scandals broke, and to rehabilitate themselves for a potential comeback.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/why_was_sanfords_comeback_easier_than_others/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/why_was_sanfords_comeback_easier_than_others/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
