<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Marriage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/marriage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 03:16:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Pat Robertson: Husbands won&#8217;t cheat if the wife makes the home &#8220;wonderful&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/pat_robertson_husbands_wont_cheat_if_the_wife_makes_the_home_wonderful/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/pat_robertson_husbands_wont_cheat_if_the_wife_makes_the_home_wonderful/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 16:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Robertson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[700 club]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cheating]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13300452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["What you want to do is make a home so wonderful that he doesn’t want to wander," he said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat Robertson argued on a recent episode of "The 700 Club" that if a man cheats on his wife, she should focus on making the home as "wonderful" as possible so that he doesn't "want to wander."</p><p>Robertson began by saying the wife should focus on the good about her cheating husband: "Does he provide a home for you to live in? Does he provide food for you to eat? Does he provide clothes for you to wear? Is he nice to the children? ... Is he handsome?"</p><p>"Give him honor instead of trying to worry about it," he continued. "But recognize also, like it or not, males have a tendency to wander a little bit and what you want to do is make a home so wonderful that he doesn’t want to wander.”</p><p>Watch, via <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/robertson-tells-woman-whose-husband-cheated-remember-hes-man-and-be-grateful-she-lives-ameri">Right Wing Watch</a>:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/k_n-q_0qej4" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/pat_robertson_husbands_wont_cheat_if_the_wife_makes_the_home_wonderful/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/pat_robertson_husbands_wont_cheat_if_the_wife_makes_the_home_wonderful/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>110</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why are men still proposing?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/12/why_are_men_still_proposing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/12/why_are_men_still_proposing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proposals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13294253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marriage and gender roles are changing dramatically -- but we still expect guys to get down on one knee]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We didn't have much of an audience. There was a couple just out of earshot reverently staring at the horizon, and a lone crow hovering in place a couple of feet in front of us, its glossy black body effortlessly buoyed by the lift of the ocean wind. "Hey, you," I told the bird, nonchalantly. "We just got engaged."</p><p>Christopher and I had hiked four miles through the mossy Point Reyes forest to a dramatic cliff overlooking the ocean. We sat in the dirt, which was pockmarked with mouse holes and accented with ice plant in electric-pink bloom. Turquoise waves churned below and a seagull took stomach-turning dives as we read each other letters we had written moments before alongside a shady creek. These notes -- our individual expressions of why we wanted to make this commitment -- said the same things with different words. We cried, hugged and then took turns asking, "Will you marry me?" We both said yes and, hands shaking, slipped engagement rings on each other's fingers.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/12/why_are_men_still_proposing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/12/why_are_men_still_proposing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>64</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Of conscience and creativity</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/of_conscience_and_creativity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/of_conscience_and_creativity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Since You Asked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creativity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infidelity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workplace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workplace romance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monogamy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13292943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There's a man who fires my imagination ... but how far will it go before it threatens my marriage?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Cary, </strong></p><p><strong>I've followed you for what feels like 10 years, as I've traversed the quarter-life crisis and crises of creativity that speak powerfully to the blood that has always run through my veins. </strong></p><p><strong>So now I come to you with a more commonplace problem in some ways, but still so connected to the vein of creativity that you speak so well to. </strong></p><p><strong>There is a man. Isn't there always? An older man, and one I work with. So banal, I know. But we've been as you might call it, "good," or as good as one can be as two married people. We've admitted our attraction to each other, but agreed it would be reckless, careless and selfish to take it any further. I am not under any illusion that I love him, but I do enjoy his company. And that's my dilemma.  After traveling with him for work this week, staying up just talking until the sun came up, I suddenly feel a wave of creativity rushing my every sense. It's like being a teenager again, but one who's actually read ee cummings, Whitman and Milton. I find myself scooping up old poetry books, reading Shakespeare and even writing down the colors of this strange, yet I imagine so universal, blend of emotions. It's addicting in the way that any other vice might be, but I'm still young (so they tell me, at 28), so still learning the ways of this strange and wonderful world. </strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/of_conscience_and_creativity/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/of_conscience_and_creativity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My virginity mistake</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/my_virginity_mistake/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/my_virginity_mistake/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abstinence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coupling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13289015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I took an abstinence pledge hoping it would ensure a strong marriage. Instead, it led to a quick divorce]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was 14 years old when I married Jesus. Not Jesus, the Panamanian who worked at Six Flags. I mean Jesus Christ, the Lord. My parents sent me off to Baptist youth camp in Panama City Beach for the week, and I came home with a tan and a purity ring. I sat with my legs crossed, cramped in a theater with 200 sweaty, sobbing teens as our pastor described the unwavering bonds of sex and why it should only be experienced within the confines of marriage.</p><p>The lyrics echoed in the background as he shouted about STDs and unplanned pregnancy from the pulpit. <em>Cause I am waiting for you, praying for you darling, wait for me too, wait for me as I wait for you.</em> One by one we each placed a ring on our fourth finger and made vows to an apparently bi-curious Jesus who took teenage husbands and wives by the dozen that night.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/my_virginity_mistake/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/my_virginity_mistake/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>172</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I&#8217;m successful but depressed</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/im_successful_but_depressed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/im_successful_but_depressed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Since You Asked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ocd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obsessive compulsive disorder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[therapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The one percent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13286911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I did everything right. I won all the cash and prizes. So why do I not feel life is worth living?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Cary, </strong></p><p><strong>You are an amazing voice of reason out there, so I am writing to you. In a nutshell, I am miserable. I am 39 going on 40. Anyone looking at my life from the outside would think (and they are correct) I have nothing to complain about. I have three great kids, wife of many years, am a successful professional who makes enough money to perhaps not be a 1-percenter, but certainly a 5-percenter. Heck, I was a college athlete and am still in good shape. So why do I feel so worthless? </strong></p><p><strong>I am OCD and depressive. I used to drink, and stopped cold-turkey several years ago because I figured out I was drinking myself into a stupor to turn off the feelings of hopelessness, and the next day, when I would be sick, was the lowest. And as my kids got older I did not want them to see me out of control like that. I was not "addicted" to alcohol, i.e., I was able to stop. It was simply my therapy of choice for these feelings of wanting to be dead. </strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/im_successful_but_depressed/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/im_successful_but_depressed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minnesota bill would institute universal civil unions, leave marriage to churches</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/minnesota_bill_would_institute_universal_civil_unions_leave_marriage_to_churches/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/minnesota_bill_would_institute_universal_civil_unions_leave_marriage_to_churches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 22:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13282276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the ongoing debate about equal rights for gay families, a Minnesota lawmaker takes a different approach ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Minnesota state lawmakers consider a measure to legalize gay marriage and an alternative civil unions bill for gay couples, Democratic state Rep. Kim Norton has signed on to a third option: universal civil unions.</p><p>The bill would offer civil unions to gay and straight couples, getting the state government out of the marriage business altogether and making "certain that every Minnesotan couple gets a civil union in the state of Minnesota," Norton <a href="http://www.kaaltv.com/article/stories/S3010713.shtml?cat=10217" target="_blank">told</a> ABC's KAALTV. The measure would leave marriage "to the churches that are offering them," she added. Norton did not address how the measure, which was introduced on Thursday, would secure federal benefits for Minnesota couples or out-of-state recognition of civil partnerships.</p><p>Norton had previously supported the Republican-backed measure for gay civil unions, but withdrew her support after calling the bill unfair and unequal. This, she says, is a better compromise.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/minnesota_bill_would_institute_universal_civil_unions_leave_marriage_to_churches/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/minnesota_bill_would_institute_universal_civil_unions_leave_marriage_to_churches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>61</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sonic Youth&#8217;s Kim Gordon opens up about split with Thurston Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/sonic_youths_kim_gordon_opens_up_about_divorce_from_thurston_moore/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/sonic_youths_kim_gordon_opens_up_about_divorce_from_thurston_moore/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 20:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sonic youth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kim gordon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thurston moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affairs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13278879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The indie rock power couple separated in 2011 after Gordon discovered Moore's affair]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For 27 years, Kim Gordon and Thurston Moore were one of rock's most enviable couples, successfully pioneering a path for the indie rock scene with band Sonic Youth. But in 2011, the band dismantled and Moore and Gordon filed for divorce -- a split that <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/18/how_could_kim_gordon_and_thurston_moore_divorce/">rattled indie fans to the core</a>.</p><p>In this month's <a href="http://www.elle.com/pop-culture/celebrities/kim-gordon-sonic-youth-profile?src=soc_fcbks">Elle Magazine</a>, Gordon opens up about what happened:</p><blockquote><p>Some years ago, a woman Gordon declines to name became a part of the Sonic Youth world, first as the girlfriend of an erstwhile band member and later as a partner on a literary project with Moore. Eventually, Gordon discovered a text message and confronted him about having an affair. They went to counseling, but he kept seeing the other woman. "We never got to the point where we could just get rid of her so I could decide what I wanted to do," Gordon says. "Thurston was carrying on this whole double life with her. He was really like a lost soul." Moore moved out. Gordon stayed home and listened to a lot of hip-hop. "Rap music is really good when you’re traumatized," she says.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/sonic_youths_kim_gordon_opens_up_about_divorce_from_thurston_moore/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/sonic_youths_kim_gordon_opens_up_about_divorce_from_thurston_moore/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On bisexuality: An apology</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/on_bisexuality_an_apology/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/on_bisexuality_an_apology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Since You Asked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feelings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verbal Abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fathers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psychotherapy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13275024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Plus: I can't get close to him. We've been dating for two months and he still seems distant]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Reader,</p><p>Regarding my last two columns, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/21_and_bi_should_i_marry/" target="_blank">this one</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/more_thinking_on_bisexuality/" target="_blank">this one,</a> I seem to have made an error that was offensive to many people who identify as bisexual, and I apologize. I do. I really do. I can really fall in love with my own nonsense sometimes. And to those who have written agreeing with me, I appreciate it, but I think I was wrong.</p><p>Here is the flaw in my thinking, courtesy of a kindly scholar of argument:</p><p>"Logically, your position relies on a fallacy of amphiboly that confuses two different uses of the term 'two.'  Being attracted to 'two' sexes is not the same thing as wanting 'two' partners. Could a bisexual person be polyamorous?  Sure. But so could a heterosexual person. You say that being lesbian means one wants to be partners with women (etc).  Does that mean that being a lesbian means that one wants to be partners with ALL women?  More than one woman? By extension, does being heterosexual (man wants to be partners with women) mean that a man wants to be partners with ALL women? More than one? Besides, being bisexual doesn't mean that one has 'two' attractions.  It means that one’s preferences don’t necessarily depend on sex.  It’s not that you want to have sex with 'both' men and women.  It’s just as easily that you want to have sex with either a man or a woman."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/on_bisexuality_an_apology/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/on_bisexuality_an_apology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More thinking on bisexuality</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/more_thinking_on_bisexuality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/more_thinking_on_bisexuality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Since You Asked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bisexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-sex marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open marriages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plural marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBTQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBTQ Righgts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lgbt equality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13273657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My suggestion that the "B" in LGBTQ implies legalizing plural marriage got angry replies]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Reader,</p><p>In response to a recent column about <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/21_and_bi_should_i_marry/" target="_blank">a bisexual woman who was wondering</a> if she should marry, some people wrote angrily to say that one does not have to want to be in a plural marriage to be bisexual. That makes sense. They said that they were bisexual but happy in a committed monogamous relationship. That too sounds reasonable. Some claimed to have been hurt or insulted by my recent words about bisexuality. So I reexamined what I wrote.</p><p>I want to be kind and I want to be fair and want to admit that I can make mistakes. I hurt some people and I am sorry. I erred in not speaking to enough bisexual people to understand the sensitivity of the issue. I got swept away in the pure logic of it. For that I am sorry.</p><p>But let me state affirmatively what underlies my thinking. People need to make choices based on who they really are. In order to do that they must have legal choices that suit who they are.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/more_thinking_on_bisexuality/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/more_thinking_on_bisexuality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You don&#8217;t know anything about the Osbournes marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/you_dont_know_anything_about_the_osbournes_marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/you_dont_know_anything_about_the_osbournes_marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ozzy Osbourne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sharon Osbourne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[will smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jada Pinkett Smith]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13273654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reality TV has skewed celeb marriage. If the Osbournes or Will and Jada Smith make the unconventional work, great]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Divorce rates <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/02/us/more-americans-rejecting-marriage-in-50s-and-beyond.html">may be on the rise for baby boomers</a>, but 64-year-old Ozzy Osbourne says he and wife Sharon aren’t jumping on the bandwagon. The Black Sabbath frontman <a href="https://www.facebook.com/ozzyosbourne/posts/10151607133627318">took to his Facebook page</a> this week to clear up the gossip on why Sharon moved out of the home they shared and traveled alone to Mexico, prompting <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2013/04/15/sharon-ozzy-osbourne-split/">speculation on the demise of their 31-year-old marriage</a>:</p><blockquote><p>For the last year and a half I have been drinking and taking drugs. I was in a very dark place and was an asshole to the people I love most, my family. However, I am happy to say that I am now 44 days sober.</p> <p>Just to set the record straight, Sharon and I are not divorcing. I’m just trying to be a better person.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/you_dont_know_anything_about_the_osbournes_marriage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/you_dont_know_anything_about_the_osbournes_marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My gay green card marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/my_gay_green_card_marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/my_gay_green_card_marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13269133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For five years I was the husband to a lovely Brazilian woman -- despite the fact that neither of us is straight]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p dir="ltr">We met up on a recent rainy weeknight at an unremarkable legal office in the outer boroughs. Inside, a warm but appropriately solemn woman sat me down, explained the basics, and told me to sign here, here and here. On the way out the attorney warned Flavia and me that it’d take at least a few months yet for the paperwork to weave itself through the courts. We exchanged resigned glances, sighed semi-dramatically, thanked her for her time, then ducked into a boisterous Greek restaurant a few blocks away for dinner.</p><p dir="ltr">When the waiter brought us our bottle of wine we filled our glasses to the brim, mused about the end of an era, and raised a toast: “To divorce!”</p><p dir="ltr">After a Mediterranean feast we headed over to her apartment nearby so I could finish up some work emails, and over some more wine flipped through our old wedding album, giggling at some of the cheesy photos from the reception. Conspicuously absent from our little album, which a federal bureaucrat had paged through some years back while scrutinizing us closely, were pictures from our honeymoon, a wild Saturday night spent at the Cubbyhole, a popular lesbian bar in the West Village where, incidentally, we also first decided to get married.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/my_gay_green_card_marriage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/my_gay_green_card_marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>21 and bi: Should I marry?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/21_and_bi_should_i_marry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/21_and_bi_should_i_marry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Since You Asked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bisexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polyamory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13268036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I want to travel and have other partners. But I'm engaged to the man I love]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Hi Cary,</strong></p><p><strong>I'm a 21-year-old woman, and I've been engaged since 18. (We're not really religious or anything, so that's not a factor.) When we decided to get married, for me it was kind of on a whim. I was young and didn't really get what it means to make a lifetime commitment. So now we live together and plan to get married later this year. I love him more than anything. He's my best friend and knows me better than anyone else. We get along great and rarely fight. He would make an incredible husband. But at the same time, I don't feel ready to make a lifetime commitment. </strong></p><p><strong>I feel I haven't had enough time to experience life independently and develop myself. I know that he doesn't feel the same way. He's very serious about getting married and seems to have no second thoughts. We're the same age. To make things more complicated, he recently lost a parent and lost his job, and he's going through a hard time, and I love him and want to support him, not make things worse. I don't know what to do. </strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/21_and_bi_should_i_marry/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/21_and_bi_should_i_marry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newlywed discovers she is allergic to her husband&#8217;s sperm</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/newlywed_discovers_she_is_allergic_to_her_husbands_sperm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/newlywed_discovers_she_is_allergic_to_her_husbands_sperm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 18:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abstinence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sperm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13268200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In which premarital chastity wins a newlywed couple a trip to the immunologist]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clara and Jeff (names changed by ABC News) waited until marriage to have sex. But instead of being rewarded for their chastity with mind-bending copulation, as is <a href="http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2011/november/making-chastity-sexy-interview.html" target="_blank">so often promised</a> in religious circles, the couple faced a medical emergency.</p><p>"I had this bizarre reaction," Clara <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Health/allergy-sperm-game-changer-marriage/story?id=18916973#.UWb3myvBKtV" target="_blank">told</a> ABC. "I had burning and swelling and redness, which was very unusual. I thought I had contracted an STD."</p><p>After a series of visits to the gynecologist, Clara discovered the hard truth: She was allergic to her new husband's sperm.</p><p>"It was a real problem," Jeff <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Health/allergy-sperm-game-changer-marriage/story?id=18916973#.UWb3myvBKtV" target="_blank">said</a>. "Because everything else was great. We were madly in love, but it was a real game-changer for a while. It pretty much dramatically reduced our libido. We really haven't had much sex at all for the last 10 months. The intimacy level drops dramatically -- all of a sudden, instead of living with your new wife or husband, you are more like roommates."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/newlywed_discovers_she_is_allergic_to_her_husbands_sperm/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/newlywed_discovers_she_is_allergic_to_her_husbands_sperm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I used to love the bride</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/i_used_to_love_the_bride/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/i_used_to_love_the_bride/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 23:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weddings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coupling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13263021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People think I'm crazy for being in Ellie's wedding party. Four years ago, I thought she was going to marry me]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ellie looked stunning in her white strapless dress, yellow sash hugging her waist, which was her small rebellion against the traditional wedding gown. “Dance with me,” she said, her face radiating a hue that can only be described as pure joy. As she held me in the silky glow of the lodge where she’d recently said, “I do,” all I could think was: <em>This was supposed to be our wedding</em>.</p><p>I’d proposed to Ellie in 2009 in the town where Sappho was born. At sunset, we climbed a hill overlooking the ocean and in a very ineloquent fashion, I asked her to spend the rest of her life with me. Despite the grand romantic gesture of a proposal, when we got home from Greece, we hardly told a soul about our engagement. Partially it was because we were in a new city and nobody knew us. Partially it was because gay marriage isn’t legal in California, so announcing our engagement felt a little like playing pretend. We wanted legitimacy, and not in the form of Facebook comments. But we couldn’t have it, so we accepted our new life as betrotheds without fuss or fanfare.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/i_used_to_love_the_bride/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/i_used_to_love_the_bride/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;How to Create the Perfect Wife&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/how_to_create_the_perfect_wife/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/how_to_create_the_perfect_wife/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What to Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonfiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must-Do]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13263752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The true story of man who raised an orphan to be his ideal woman -- and got more than he bargained for]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"The Dying Negro" -- the first major anti-slavery poem in English -- was the talk of London in the summer of 1773. Although the bestselling pamphlet was published anonymously, a wealthy young political progressive named Thomas Day let it be known that he was the author. Over the next decade and a half, Day would become a familiar and fiery public voice on behalf of abolition and the independence of the American colonies, as well as an early campaigner against cruelty toward animals. He would also write a hugely popular children's novel, "The History of Sandford and Merton." But, as Wendy Moore observes in her transfixing new book on Day, in the year "The Dying Negro" was published, few readers "would have suspected that its chief author secretly maintained a teenage girl who was completely subordinate to his commands and whims."</p><p>The title of Moore's book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0465065740/?tag=saloncom08-20">"How to Create the Perfect Wife,"</a> explains what Day was up to. From an early age -- sniffing at the revelry in that 18th-century party school, Oxford -- Day knew exactly how he intended to live. He planned to commit himself to "the unremitting practice of the severest virtue." He would adopt an austere existence in the country, thinking, reading, writing and doing good works, while receiving few visitors. The one thing he required to achieve this nirvana was a mate, and for that, too, he had something very particular in mind.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/how_to_create_the_perfect_wife/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/how_to_create_the_perfect_wife/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not getting married is the new getting married</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/not_getting_married_is_the_new_getting_married/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/not_getting_married_is_the_new_getting_married/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 16:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cohabitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cohabiting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13261623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A federal study on unmarried partners shows cohabiting relationships are increasing -- and lasting longer than ever]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a report from the National Center for Health Statistics, unmarried couples who live together are staying together longer and having more babies than at any other time in the past. (Cue moral panic about: the Gays; the rise of feminism; the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/fox_news_host_firing_abusive_rutgers_coach_is_wussification_of_america/" target="_blank">"wussification" of American men</a>; other conservative garbage et cetera ad nauseam.)</p><p>As <a href="http://www.ksdk.com/news/article/373401/28/Cohabitation-first-is-new-norm-for-unmarried-couples-with-kids-" target="_blank">reported</a> by USA Today, for almost half of the nearly 13,000 women researchers interviewed, their "first union" was living with an unmarried partner -- not marriage. The survey also found that marriage was the "first union" for less than 25 percent of women, down from 39 percent in 1995.</p><p>Other findings include:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/not_getting_married_is_the_new_getting_married/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/not_getting_married_is_the_new_getting_married/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will gays save marriage?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/30/will_gays_save_marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/30/will_gays_save_marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense of Marriage Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13254985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Same-sex marriage is but one of many historical changes to the institution. An expert considers what's next]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many conservatives would have you believe that same-sex unions turn the institution of marriage upside-down -- but it's actually rather fitting with tradition. That is, if you consider the historical trajectory of marriage: It's changed tremendously over the decades, from a financial transaction to the romantic one that we know today. It would be naive to think that major changes won't continue in the decades to come.</p><p>Given this, and the Supreme Court hearings this week on the Defense of Marriage Act, I started thinking about what the future of marriage might look like. I wondered -- out of liberal glee, rather than conservative terror, mind you -- whether same-sex unions could open up the institution to even bigger changes. Might we someday extend marriage's 1,000-plus legal benefits and protections to people regardless of relationship status? Would we ever institutionally separate monogamy from marriage? What about allowing for polygamy or group parenthood?</p><p>I called up Barbara Risman, a senior scholar at the Council on Contemporary Families and sociology professor at University of Illinois at Chicago, to get her predictions. We talked about everything from monogamy to polygamy, utilitarian marriages to romance. One thing became clear: Marriage isn't going anywhere.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/30/will_gays_save_marriage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/30/will_gays_save_marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>North Carolina lawmaker wants to impose a two-year waiting period for divorce</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/north_carolina_lawmaker_wants_to_impose_a_two_year_waiting_period_for_divorce/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/north_carolina_lawmaker_wants_to_impose_a_two_year_waiting_period_for_divorce/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 15:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13255624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republican state. Sen. Austin Allran's bill also mandates marriage counseling and a class on divorce and children]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republican state Sen. Austin Allran wants to impose a <a href="http://www.ncleg.net/Sessions/2013/Bills/Senate/HTML/S518v0.html" target="_blank">two-year waiting period and mandatory marriage counseling</a> for couples seeking a divorce in North Carolina. The “Healthy Marriage Act” would also force couples to attend a four-hour course on the impact of divorce on children.</p><p>The new requirements, according to the <a href="http://www.ncleg.net/Sessions/2013/Bills/Senate/HTML/S518v0.html" target="_blank">bill</a> introduced on Thursday (emphasis Allran's):</p><blockquote><p> 50‑6.  Divorce after <s>separation of one year</s><span style="text-decoration: underline;">two‑year waiting period</span> on application of either party.</p> <p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">(a)</span>        Marriages may be dissolved and the parties thereto divorced from the bonds of matrimony on the application of either <s>party, if and when the </s><span style="text-decoration: underline;">party upon satisfying the following requirements before filing for divorce under this section:</span></p> <p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">(1)</span>        <span style="text-decoration: underline;">The </span>husband and wife have <s>lived separate and apart for one year,and the</s><span style="text-decoration: underline;">met a two‑year waiting period. The spouse seeking the divorce shall give a written notice of intent to file for divorce to the other spouse at the beginning of the two‑year waiting period. The notice of intent shall be properly acknowledged in accordance with Chapter 10B of the General Statutes. During the two‑year waiting period, there is no requirement that the husband and wife live separate and apart.</span></p> <p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">(2)</span>        <span style="text-decoration: underline;">During the two‑year waiting period, the husband and wife have each completed courses on (i) improving communication skills and (ii) conflict resolution. Courses required by this subdivision do not have to be completed together as a couple.</span></p> <p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">(3)</span>        <span style="text-decoration: underline;">If a couple has a child, the husband and wife have each completed a course of at least four hours on the impact of divorce on children.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p></blockquote><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/north_carolina_lawmaker_wants_to_impose_a_two_year_waiting_period_for_divorce/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/north_carolina_lawmaker_wants_to_impose_a_two_year_waiting_period_for_divorce/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>113</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The last, worst argument against gay marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/the_last_worst_argument_against_gay_marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/the_last_worst_argument_against_gay_marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 21:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-sex marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13252665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When you lose arguments based on bigotry, you're left with one based on an idea of marriage we rejected already]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most popular opposition to same sex marriage is driven by simple homophobia. I'm sure opponents would disagree, but it seems like the rapid shift in public opinion on the question is evidence that the once-prevalent attitude that gays are weird and/or gross is dissipating as straight Americans get to know more and more out LGBT Americans.</p><p>"Gays are weird and/or gross," though, is not a great <em>legal</em> argument, and right now the Supreme Court is deciding whether or not there is a good reason for the state to ban same-sex marriages while allowing opposite-sex marriages. So far the best that opponents of equality could come up with was "opposite marriage is just the way marriage has always been." That falls apart when you compare the modern American institution of marriage to marriages as they've been practiced throughout human history, as anyone who has read a book called "the Bible" could tell you. So the opponents moved on to their current argument -- the last, best argument for banning gay marriage -- which is, basically, "for the children."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/the_last_worst_argument_against_gay_marriage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/the_last_worst_argument_against_gay_marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>133</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arguing with anti-gay bigots</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/how_to_stop_anti_gay_bigots/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/how_to_stop_anti_gay_bigots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EQUAL RIGHTS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lgbt equality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13250131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's not complicated: Opposing gay marriage means treating LGBT people less equally. And that's unconstitutional]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Almost six decades ago, the Supreme Court <a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&amp;vol=347&amp;invol=483">ruled</a> in no uncertain terms that "the doctrine of 'separate but equal' has no place" in American law. The ruling solidified the notion that separate is inherently unequal, and that it is also unconstitutional in a country whose 14th Amendment declares unequivocally that "no state shall ... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the <em>equal</em> protection of the laws."</p><p>As discredited as "separate but equal" is, however, the Republican Party is now latching onto it when it comes to the rights of LGBT Americans. Indeed, with <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/03/18/gay-marriage-support-hits-new-high-in-post-abc-poll/">polls</a> showing the GOP's staunch anti-gay-marriage position now at odds with American public opinion, Republican voices have resorted to arguing that keeping same-sex marriage illegal somehow doesn't mean that LGBT people are being treated as less equal than everyone else. They are additionally arguing that their opposition to legalizing same sex marriage doesn't mean they are bigots against LGBT people.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/how_to_stop_anti_gay_bigots/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/how_to_stop_anti_gay_bigots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>64</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
