<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Media Criticism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/media_criticism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 13:17:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Al Jazeera different than Fox?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/can_al_jazeera_win_over_american_news_junkies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/can_al_jazeera_win_over_american_news_junkies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Jazeera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9-11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osama Bin Laden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time warner cable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arab Spring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arabs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... or MSNBC? The Qatari network had a rough intro a decade ago and Time Warner -- and others -- won't forget ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Qatari network Al Jazeera’s purchase of Al Gore’s Current news channel, <a href="http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/02/al-jazeera-said-to-be-acquiring-current-tv/">revealed yesterday</a>, has already hit a snag: <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/02/time-warner-al-jazeera-current-tv_n_2399370.html">Time Warner Cable promptly dropped Current</a>, denying the forthcoming Al Jazeera America access to Time Warner subscribers.</p><p>Though the Time Warner decision had reportedly been threatened due to Current’s low ratings, there’s no denying that at least some segment of the U.S. viewing public has long harbored antipathy toward Al Jazeera. <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/01/03/liberal-al-gore-becomes-very-rich-hypocrite-with-sale-current-tv/">An editorial published today</a> by Fox News runs through the talking points about the network it calls “anti-American terror mouthpiece Al Jazeera.” Among them: “Al Jazeera, known as the network of the Arab Street, is also known for taking anti-American, anti-Israel and pro-terror positions.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/can_al_jazeera_win_over_american_news_junkies/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/can_al_jazeera_win_over_american_news_junkies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Downton Abbey&#8221;: Hard times hit the estate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/downton_abbey_hard_times_hit_the_estate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/downton_abbey_hard_times_hit_the_estate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 17:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Downton Abbey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The series, like Downton itself, once provided an abundance of riches. But nothing lasts forever]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few nights ago, I dreamed about “Downton Abbey.” Mr. Bates had taken Matthew Crawley hostage and was holding him at knife point in some soignée drawing room, a costume dream remake of “Misery.” Other people’s dreams — particularly the ones that do not contain the existence of you — are, as a rule, dull, so I won’t go on about the drapery patterns or the motive or Bates' strange expertise with knots. The basic outline makes my point: Over its first two genteel, delectable seasons “Downton Abbey” has sunk its well-manicured hooks in me, lodging so deep that my subconscious now spews out alternative story lines in which the pious Mr. Bates has been made over into a villain (which, not for nothing, would make him a whole lot more interesting).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/downton_abbey_hard_times_hit_the_estate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/downton_abbey_hard_times_hit_the_estate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time Warner drops Current after Al Jazeera deal</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/time_warner_drops_current_after_al_jazeera_deal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/time_warner_drops_current_after_al_jazeera_deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 15:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time warner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Jazeera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cable News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Al Jazeera's struggle to reach U.S. homes meets another setback after major deal to buy Gore's network goes through]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Al Jazeera this week purchased Al Gore's cable network Current TV in what the New York Times' <a href="http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/02/al-jazeera-said-to-be-acquiring-current-tv/?hp">Brian Stelter called </a>"a coming of age moment" for the Qatar-funded network in the United States. By buying Current, Al Jazeera seemed set to establish itself in the U.S. after struggling for years to gain purchase in unreceptive markets outside of New York and Washington.</p><p>However, hours after the estimated $500 million deal was made, Time Warner Cable announced that it would no longer carry the Current channel, and thus Al Jazeera's new channel Al Jazeera America would not be distributed by the cable provider. Although the Current deal will still bring Al Jazeera into around 40 million American homes, the Time Warner move constituted a considerable blow for the globally respected network -- Time Warner Cable reaches 12 million homes.</p><p>As HuffPo's Michael Calderone<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/02/time-warner-al-jazeera-current-tv_n_2399370.html"> reported:</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/time_warner_drops_current_after_al_jazeera_deal/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/time_warner_drops_current_after_al_jazeera_deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dying to take a celebrity photo</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/dying_to_take_a_celebrity_photo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/dying_to_take_a_celebrity_photo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 15:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paparazzi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Bieber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An amateur photographer is hit by a car snapping a photo of the singer's white Ferrari -- and he wasn't even in it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In what immediately qualifies as the worst way to die of the new year thus far, a Los Angeles paparazzo was killed Tuesday while trying to obtain photographs … of Justin Bieber's car.</p><p>Bieber was reportedly <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2013/01/01/justin-bieber-ferrari-paparazzo-killed/ ">not even in his white Ferrari</a> when it was pulled over by California Highway Patrol for speeding — a friend of the singer was behind the wheel while Bieber was elsewhere. But the car – and Bieber's vehicular comings and goings – are familiar to local lensmen. In November, Judge Thomas Rubinson dismissed a reckless driving charge against photographer Paul Raef, who in July was involved in a high-speed freeway chase in pursuit of Bieber. At the time, Raef's frantic driving, at speeds over 80 mph, prompted several 911 calls. But Robinson ruled that a 2010 law meant to curtail that kind of potentially dangerous behavior, "in pursuit of photos for commercial gain," could conflict with legitimate First Amendment-protected news gathering.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/dying_to_take_a_celebrity_photo/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/dying_to_take_a_celebrity_photo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Record reviews: Who needs them?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/record_reviews_who_needs_them/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/record_reviews_who_needs_them/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Christgau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foo Fighters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nirvana]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13156233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Music criticism is in a horrible state. It wouldn't have to be if we talked about albums like they really mattered]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could be wrong, but – adding together a decade of <a href="http://trouserpress.com/">Trouser Press</a> magazine, five Trouser Press Record Guides and a whole lot of freelance writing -- I may have reviewed as many albums as any American rock critic this side of <a href="http://www.robertchristgau.com/">Bob Christgau.</a> From adroit to inept, I’ve offered my full faith and credit to a small percentage of them, attacked some (with the fierce indignation generally reserved for orphan-robbers, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmEe7vHpKCg">World Series goats</a> and career criminals) and juggled the rest. I suppose I’ve shared a few valuable insights, but no doubt just as often I’ve come up empty, papering over ambivalence with utilitarian description.</p><p>How often was I right? Even if we can stipulate that there is a “right,” it’s hard to say, since the inconstancy of life synchs unreliably with value judgments that have been frozen in time. What was on the money in 1978 may seem horribly naïve in 1988 and condescending by 2008. Plus, a critic continues to hear and learn long after committing an appraisal to print, and that both alters the context and expands culture’s possibilities. When it comes to records that no longer live clearly in my memory, even going back for a refresher listen promises only a slim chance of summoning up enough sense of who I was and what I knew at the time to extrapolate what I was feeling when I wrote what I did.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/record_reviews_who_needs_them/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/record_reviews_who_needs_them/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do media vultures perpetuate mass shootings?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/29/do_media_vultures_perpetuate_mass_shootings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/29/do_media_vultures_perpetuate_mass_shootings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook Elementary Shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown school shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Columbine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dylan Klebold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Harris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Cullen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trenchcoat mafia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13152608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We remember the killers' names, but not the victims, mourns the daughter of a teacher at Columbine]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Outside Columbine High on the day of the attacks, a photographer standing near me flipped open a phone and cheered, excitement uncontained: "It's Pulitzer time!" This man knew I could hear him. He just didn't care. At the time — and in my shock — I registered disgust, but commercial journalism wasn’t yet my life’s loudest bully. Before the month was over, there would be a Japanese reporter camping out in a car outside my house. When someone from our shattered family came or went, he would scramble out of the car, seeking salable dirt on the shooters. They had been students in one of my mom's classes. My aunt taught English to several of their victims.</p><p>My aunt called the reporters “carrion birds.” My mom was too stunned to say much of anything about them. It fell to me to field their calls: “Columbine,” this thing that wounded 24 and killed 13 and almost took my mother, was an all-day, wall-to-wall media happening. A pair of journalists from the New York Times even used an enrolled student as a ruse. My mom arrived at a coffee shop to tutor a boy who’d been unable to return to school, and there they were, tagging along. Interrupting education. Seeking any small anecdote on murderers the 24-hour news cycle had already turned forever into figures of anti-heroic intrigue.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/29/do_media_vultures_perpetuate_mass_shootings/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/29/do_media_vultures_perpetuate_mass_shootings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Defending Judd Apatow&#8217;s midlife crisis</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/defending_judd_apatows_midlife_crisis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/defending_judd_apatows_midlife_crisis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 16:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judd apatow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Rudd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[this is 40]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[midlife crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leslie mann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louis CK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tig Notaro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mike birbiglia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cinema]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13156402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["This Is 40" is being dismissed as a self-indulgent, cringeworthy mess. But that's what makes it so brilliant]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the first week of its release on Dec. 21, "This Is 40” has been met with <a href="http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/moviesnow/la-et-mn-this-is-40-judd-apatow-leslie-mann-reviews-20121227,0,5477103.story">poor box-office sales</a> and middling reviews, with many critics branding Judd Apatow's latest as <a href="http://movies.nytimes.com/2012/12/21/movies/this-is-40-from-judd-apatow-and-starring-paul-rudd.html">sloppy</a>, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/gog/movies/this-is-40,1234220/critic-review.html">overlong,</a> <a href="http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20121221/ENT02/212210323">self-indulgent</a> claptrap. Both receptions are a shame, since "40” marks not only a continuation of the filmmaker’s creative evolution but also a culmination of what has been most compelling in comedy over the past couple of years. With its unflinching honesty, ruthless candor, and fascination with uneasy truth over pat payoffs, Apatow’s latest feels less like his previous work and more like a 132-minute episode of "Louie." Sure, the aesthetic is markedly different — "This Is 40” has the gloss of slick studio product — but the spirit and sensibility are the same: It's a stark autobiography and uncomfortable confession, where laughter is the casual byproduct of situation and personality (rather than the other way around) and dramatic beats ring painfully true.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/defending_judd_apatows_midlife_crisis/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/defending_judd_apatows_midlife_crisis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Limbaugh: NRA&#8217;s LaPierre the adult in gun control debate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/limbaugh_nras_lapierre_the_adult_in_gun_control_debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/limbaugh_nras_lapierre_the_adult_in_gun_control_debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 19:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne LaPierre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13152453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a radio rant as wild as the NRA chief's press conference, Rush blames the liberal media for, well, everything]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wayne LaPierre finally has someone who will defend him.</p><p><a href="http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2012/12/21/don_t_blame_me_for_plan_b_debacle">Surprise, it's Rush Limbaugh.</a></p><p>On his radio show this afternoon, Limbaugh called the NRA leader "an adult looking for real solutions," and said he was "disrespected" by Code Pink protesters who, he claimed, would never interrupt a hearing on Benghazi.</p><p>"No matter what he said, Wayne LaPierre sounded like an adult looking for real solutions, but that's not what this country's interested in right now. Sorry. The adults are not running this show," said Limbaugh.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/limbaugh_nras_lapierre_the_adult_in_gun_control_debate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/limbaugh_nras_lapierre_the_adult_in_gun_control_debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Has Fox News silenced pro-gun advocate?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/has_fox_news_silenced_pro_gun_advocate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/has_fox_news_silenced_pro_gun_advocate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 19:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Lott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown shooting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13151139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reports: A "more guns, less crime" thinker -- absent from Fox since Newtown -- has a column killed by FoxNews.com]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Lott">John Lott </a>is one of the most prominent advocates of the "more guns, less crime" theory. Indeed, that's the title of his book: "More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws." The economist has taught at Yale, the University of Chicago and Penn's Wharton School. He's co-authored a book with Grover Norquist. And he's a Fox News contributor with a frequent column on FoxNews.com.</p><p>But as <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/wp/2012/12/19/newtown-why-is-gun-advocate-john-lott-doing-his-best-work-on-cnn/">Erik Wemple points out in the Washington Post today,</a> Lott has not appeared on Fox News or its web site since the Newtown massacre -- but he has been a regular on CNN, on various panels and in much-talked-about arguments with Soledad O'Brien and Piers Morgan.</p><p>Wemple writes:</p><blockquote><p>While Lott has been given ample opportunity on CNN to air his views on the Newtown massacre, he hasn’t yet spoken up on the matter on FoxNews.com. His last column surfaced Dec. 6, a <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/12/06/bob-costas-cant-shoot-straight-when-it-comes-to-guns/">second critique of Costas’ call for a new look at guns</a>. He has written a column on the implications of Newtown — for <a href="http://www.usnews.com/debate-club/did-the-sandy-hook-shooting-prove-the-need-for-more-gun-control/gun-restrictions-leave-people-vulnerable-and-helpless">U.S. News &amp; World Report</a>.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/has_fox_news_silenced_pro_gun_advocate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/has_fox_news_silenced_pro_gun_advocate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Limbaugh: Maybe the Mayan apocalypse made Adam Lanza do it</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/limbaugh_maybe_the_mayan_apocalypse_made_adam_lanza_do_it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/limbaugh_maybe_the_mayan_apocalypse_made_adam_lanza_do_it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 15:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Lanza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mayan apocalypse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13150812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rush "bounces off" the silliest Newtown theory yet: Blame it on the looming end of the world]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rush Limbaugh advanced <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/how_feminism_caused_sandy_hook_according_to_the_right/">another</a> wacky Adam Lanza theory Thursday: the end of the world made him do it.</p><p>As Rush <a href="http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2012/12/19/quick_hits_page">details</a> on his web site, Lanza -- whose mother, Nancy, was reportedly a doomsday "prepper" -- either couldn't deal with the possibility of the Mayan apocalypse on Friday or wanted to "save people" from it.</p><p>As he <a href="http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2012/12/19/quick_hits_page">pushed this theory,</a> Limbaugh had it both ways. "I'm not espousing it, I just want to bounce off of it." Here's how he bounced:</p><blockquote><p>The theory that Adam Lanza somehow had been convinced the world was gonna end Friday and he was discombobulated by it. His mother was a prepper and a survivalist and showed him guns and he went in there and did what he did to either deal with the pressure of it or maybe save people from the end, who knows what.  It happened in China, is the point.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/limbaugh_maybe_the_mayan_apocalypse_made_adam_lanza_do_it/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/limbaugh_maybe_the_mayan_apocalypse_made_adam_lanza_do_it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I am Facebook friends with Ryan Lanza</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/i_am_facebook_friends_with_ryan_lanza/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/i_am_facebook_friends_with_ryan_lanza/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 12:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan Lanza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Lanza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown shootings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13146981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And that gave me a front row seat as everyone rushed to ugly judgment about him -- and me]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I woke up late Friday morning and posted my latest comic before realizing no one would be talking about it or any other issue that day except the latest massacre unfolding before our eyes – this time involving children. Not “this time.” I mean “again.” As I had done not one week earlier when there was a mass shooting a few miles from my home in Portland, I watched the real time updates, trying to wrap my mind around being a part of the human race.</p><p>CNN <a href="https://twitter.com/CNN/status/279666440385220608">named</a> Ryan Lanza as the suspect before noon based on a police source. Within minutes, journalists at several outlets were not only reporting the name, but passing around a link to Ryan’s Facebook account. And people I knew were suddenly telling me, <em>Dude, you are Facebook friends with the suspect.</em></p><p>His wall was set to private so I was one of the only people seeing Ryan post “Fuck you CNN it wasn’t me” and “IT WASN’T ME I WAS AT WORK IT WASN’T ME.” Networks were broadcasting photos pulled from the account on national television. Buzzfeed and Gawker, in a race to snatch traffic, ran headlines speculating if this was the shooter. (Headlines with question marks now being a thing that media does.) I posted a <a href="https://twitter.com/MattBors/status/279672597837402112">screen shot</a> to Twitter and Facebook to let everyone know that<em> this</em> Ryan Lanza, at least, was not dead at the scene of the crime. That’s when things got crazy for me.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/i_am_facebook_friends_with_ryan_lanza/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/i_am_facebook_friends_with_ryan_lanza/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ABC producer earns Internet&#8217;s hate for tweeting at Newtown relatives</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/15/abc_producer_earns_internets_hate_for_tweeting_at_newtown_relatives/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/15/abc_producer_earns_internets_hate_for_tweeting_at_newtown_relatives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2012 22:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nadineatabc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13146256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The account is now gone, but the Twitterverse remains outraged]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An ABC News producer earned the wrath of Twitter for her repeated tweets at anyone she thought might be a parent or relative of a Sandy Hook Elementary School student.</p><p>The producer, Nadine Shubailat, either removed her account or Twitter suspended it. It's now gone. But screen shots of her tweets made her the public face of outrage against the media for invading the privacy of parents in the midst of unbelievable tragedy.</p><p>One person, who tweets at @artayd2, became the hero of Twitter for telling Nadine, succinctly (and <a href="http://www.vulture.com/2010/04/ice_t_teaches_aimee_mann_an_im.html">evoking memories</a> of a Twitter feud between Aimee Mann and Ice-T) to "eat a dick."</p><p>Some of our favorite responses are below:</p><p>[embedtweet id="280015552376872962"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="279732310503469056"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="280043803031793664"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="279998557245808640"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="279728966888202240"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="279748596067364864"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="279998557245808640"]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/15/abc_producer_earns_internets_hate_for_tweeting_at_newtown_relatives/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/15/abc_producer_earns_internets_hate_for_tweeting_at_newtown_relatives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No, really. Stop comparing everything to &#8220;Portlandia&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/no_really_stop_comparing_everything_to_portlandia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/no_really_stop_comparing_everything_to_portlandia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portlandia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carrie Brownstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fred armisen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13121370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We know: Every farm-to-table restaurant is like "Portlandia." So is every band. And city. And tech company. Enough!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trendspotters, take note: We asked you in February to <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/23/stop_comparing_everything_to_portlandia/">please stop comparing everything with a quirky bent to "Portlandia." </a></p><p>And for a while there, the fact that every magazine writer and blogger used the Fred Armisen and Carrie Brownstein comedy show as their go-to metaphor made it a little uncool. Only now "Portlandia" metaphor creep is back. (In a retro and nostalgic way!) Next month, the show returns for Season 3 on IFC, and that means January will bring a wearying new onslaught of references.</p><p>But as you'll see, there's almost nothing left to compare to "Portlandia." A street fight has been compared to "Portlandia." The Republican National Convention. Rock bands <em>and</em> classical groups. Restaurants in every city. Waiters. Diners. Authors. Laura Linney. (And, yes, we know! That could be a "Portlandia" sketch itself!)</p><p>So before you make the same simile as everyone else, consider this list of recent comparisons fair warning:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/no_really_stop_comparing_everything_to_portlandia/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/no_really_stop_comparing_everything_to_portlandia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How a feminist franchise becomes a trilogy of terror</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/how_a_feminist_franchise_becomes_a_trilogy_of_terror/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/how_a_feminist_franchise_becomes_a_trilogy_of_terror/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 00:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shonda rhimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kerry washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grey's Anatomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13060494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before "Girls," "Grey's Anatomy" and its offshoots exalted the complex, brash antiheroine. Then things got grisly]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one died in last week’s episode of "Grey’s Anatomy." Though the institution of marriage was certainly on the chopping block: Sandra Oh’s union was dealt a fatal blow, lapsed virgin Sarah Drew gleefully fled a shotgun wedding, and any remaining sexual chemistry between Ellen Pompeo and Patrick Dempsey was killed by baby-making issues. Chandra Wilson spent the hour dreading her impending nuptials until Oh persuaded her to accept the rite as a necessary evil: just strap on the dress and think of England.</p><p>Watching the show’s alternately unconvincing, saccharine, tart and touching plot threads wend toward their conclusion, I steeled myself for the inevitable jolt of violence I’d learned to expect from "Grey’s" and its OB-GYN spinoff, "Private Practice."</p><p>To my surprise, the episode ended benignly. Letting down my guard, I settled in to enjoy the twisty political adult soap "Scandal," grateful writer-producer Shonda Rhimes (the force behind "Grey’s" and "Practice") didn’t feel the need to deploy visceral bloody shocks to heighten suspense on her youngest series.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/how_a_feminist_franchise_becomes_a_trilogy_of_terror/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/how_a_feminist_franchise_becomes_a_trilogy_of_terror/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NYT public editor calls out paper over Manning</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/nyt_public_editor_calls_out_paper_over_manning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/nyt_public_editor_calls_out_paper_over_manning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 22:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bradley Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fort Meade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pretrial hearing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13117518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["The Times should be there" at the pretrial hearings, argues Margaret Sullivan]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New York Times public editor Margaret Sullivan <a href="http://publiceditor.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/12/05/the-times-should-have-a-reporter-at-the-bradley-manning-hearing/">Wednesday joined</a> a chorus of voices criticizing her paper for failing to send reporters to Pfc. Bradley Manning's pretrial hearings.</p><p>While the Times' Washington Bureau chief David Leonhardt defended the decision to simply republish an AP wire on the proceedings, Sullivan took the Grey Lady to task. "The testimony is dramatic and the overarching issues are important," she wrote.</p><p>Leonhardt told the public editor via email:</p><blockquote><p>As with any other legal case, we won’t cover every single proceeding. In this case, doing so would have involved multiple days of a reporter’s time, for a relatively straightforward story. The A.P. article recounting the main points of Mr. Manning’s testimony about his conditions of confinement that ran on page A3 of The Times conveyed fundamentally the same material as a staff story would have.</p></blockquote><p>However, as Times reader David Morf noted in a reprinted letter, using AP wire copy "let the story bury itself." Following Sullivan's piece, a number of commentators have taken issue with Leonhardt's reference to "any other legal case," since for many Manning's treatment by the U.S. military and his role as a whistle-blower make  his case exceptional.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/nyt_public_editor_calls_out_paper_over_manning/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/nyt_public_editor_calls_out_paper_over_manning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The New York Post defends its indefensible photo</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/the_new_york_post_defends_its_indefensible_photo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/the_new_york_post_defends_its_indefensible_photo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 16:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ki Suk Han]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R. Umar Abbasi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13115826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The photographer who captured a "doomed" subway rider, and did nothing to stop it, tries to paint himself as a hero]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Monday, 58-year-old Ki Suk Han was pushed off the platform at the 49thStreet subway station, and <a href="http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/12/03/man-pushed-in-front-of-midtown-subway-train-witnesses-say/?smid=tw-share">struck and killed</a> by a southbound Q train. Don't you feel just terrible for the photographer who was there to turn the grisly crime into a cover story for the New York Post? This whole thing has been really harrowing. <em>For him.</em></p><p>On Tuesday, the eternally tasteless Murdoch tabloid plumbed a new depth by running a cover image of Ki Suk Han helplessly clutching the edge of the platform from the tracks, his head turned in the direction of the oncoming car, with the headline, "DOOMED: Pushed on the Subway Track, This Man Is About to Die." Since then, both the image and the ethics of running it have been debated widely in other news outlets and on Twitter. In the New York Times, David Carr aptly condemned the horror of the image of "someone who is doomed, but still among us," saying the Post "milked the death of someone for maximum commercial effect … <a href="http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/12/05/train-wreck-the-new-york-posts-subway-cover/?smid=tw-share ">He ended up run over twice."</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/the_new_york_post_defends_its_indefensible_photo/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/the_new_york_post_defends_its_indefensible_photo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why can Limbaugh speak, but not Costas?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/why_can_limbaugh_speak_but_not_costas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/why_can_limbaugh_speak_but_not_costas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 18:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Costas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kanye West]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13114385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservatives get outraged when a celebrity talks politics, as long as it's not one of their "expert" entertainers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One way to understand Bob Costas' <a href="http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/tv/showtracker/la-et-st-bob-costas-gun-control-jovan-belcher-20121203,0,4037011.story">comments</a> about gun violence during halftime of NBC's Sunday evening football game is to interpret them as yet another example of media self-absorption. And in fact, by turning a horrific story of domestic violence and suicide into a cheap story about the overwrought reaction to a professional commentator, the national press did proudly fulfill the timeless jeremiad of "Broadcast News" to "never forget (that) we're the real story, not them."</p><p>But as repulsive and predictable as that narcissism is, it did inadvertently spotlight a significant problem plaguing our civic discourse. Call it Shut Up and Sing Syndrome.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/why_can_limbaugh_speak_but_not_costas/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/why_can_limbaugh_speak_but_not_costas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>73</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meet this season&#8217;s 10 TV scene-stealers and scene-killers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/02/meet_this_seasons_10_tv_scene_stealers_and_scene_killers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/02/meet_this_seasons_10_tv_scene_stealers_and_scene_killers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2012 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sitcoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dramas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slideshow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13112331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They can steal the spotlight, or leave the lead to do the heavy lifting. Meet TV's best and worst supporting actors]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every TV show has a lead actor or actress — but then there's everyone else. Supporting characters may not sell the show, but they're integral to what makes a series good or bad, funny — or so, so not funny. Herewith, a slideshow of the five best and five worst supporting actors on relatively new TV shows (or, as in the case of Bobby Cannavale, in new parts on longer-running TV shows) from Danny Castellano to Sgt. Brody's son. (And yes, basically every one on "2 Broke Girls" could have made this list, but that seemed too easy.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/02/meet_this_seasons_10_tv_scene_stealers_and_scene_killers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/02/meet_this_seasons_10_tv_scene_stealers_and_scene_killers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Local news can&#8217;t handle the ugly truth</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/local_news_cant_handle_the_ugly_truth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/local_news_cant_handle_the_ugly_truth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 20:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UCLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hate Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misogyny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asian American]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13111562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UCLA's been battling a growing problem with hate speech on campus. Why won't local media divulge the dirty details?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is plenty that's horrible about a racist, sexist act of vandalism at the University of California, Los Angeles. But along with the crime itself, there's yet another depressing aspect to the story: the way it's been reported.</p><p>On Wednesday, students discovered a handwritten sign on a bathroom stall door in the school's Powell Library that read, "Asian Women are White-Boy Worshipping Sluts." It was the second such incident in as many days. On Tuesday, a sign saying "asian women R Honkie white-boy worshipping Whores" was tacked to a Vietnamese Student Union sign on the campus's Kerckhoff Hall.</p><p>It's not the first time UCLA has battled racism, either. Last year, shortly after the Tohoku earthquake and tsunami, then-student <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/US/uclas-alexandra-wallace-apologizes-campus-asian-culture/story?id=13174245">Alexandra Wallace gained YouTube infamy</a> after posting a three-minute diatribe about the "hordes" of Asians in the school library, "going through their whole families just checking on everybody from the tsunami thing," adding, "I'll be typing away furiously, blah blah blah, and then all of the sudden, when I'm about to, like, reach an epiphany, over here from somewhere, 'OHH Ching chong ling long ting tong? OHH.'" (Wallace left the school soon after the clip went viral, saying she'd received death threats.) And last winter, a nearby apartment complex that houses students was <a href="http://blogs.laweekly.com/informer/2012/02/ucla_graffiti_mexican_racist_s.php">defaced with graffiti</a> against "you rude ignorant spic cunts" and "dirty Meximelt bitches."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/local_news_cant_handle_the_ugly_truth/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/local_news_cant_handle_the_ugly_truth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ariel Sharon&#8217;s son says &#8220;flatten all of Gaza&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/ariel_sharons_son_says_flatten_all_of_gaza/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/ariel_sharons_son_says_flatten_all_of_gaza/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 19:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gilad Sharon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ariel Sharon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operation Pillar of Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hamas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel-Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerusalem Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13102902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Former Israeli P.M.'s son draws ire for incendiary JPost op-ed, which would see Gaza go the way of Hiroshima]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In one of the most incendiary op-eds on the current Gaza crisis, Gilad Sharon, son of former Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, <a href="http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Op-EdContributors/Article.aspx?ID=292466&amp;R=R1&amp;utm_">wrote in the Jerusalem Post </a>that Israel should "Flatten all of Gaza."</p><p>Sharon, whose father ordered a withdrawal from Gaza in 2005, called for the blockaded Palestinian region to be annihilated or re-occupied by Israeli troops.</p><p>"There should be no electricity in Gaza, no gasoline or moving vehicles, nothing. Then they'd really call for a ceasefire," he wrote. "We need to flatten entire neighborhoods in Gaza. Flatten all of Gaza. The Americans didn’t stop with Hiroshima – the Japanese weren’t surrendering fast enough, so they hit Nagasaki, too."</p><p>Placing all blame for the current conflict on the people of Gaza, Sharon -- a columnist for Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth and a major in the IDF reserves  -- suggests that Palestinians in the region chose and deserve a painful fate, essentially endorsing civilian deaths:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/ariel_sharons_son_says_flatten_all_of_gaza/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/ariel_sharons_son_says_flatten_all_of_gaza/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>