<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > meet the press</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/meet_the_press/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 01:14:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why shouldn&#8217;t David Gregory be charged with a crime?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/why_shouldnt_david_gregory_be_charged_with_a_crime/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/why_shouldnt_david_gregory_be_charged_with_a_crime/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david gregory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meet the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Greenwald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perjury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Snowden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloomberg News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kill Lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero Dark Thirty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mark boal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Clapper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel Ellsberg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13334896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NBC host thinks Glenn Greenwald may be a criminal. Here are 10 items to ponder about this gross double standard]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two weeks into the hullabaloo surrounding whistle-blower Edward Snowden and Guardian reporter Glenn Greenwald, one thing is clear: They did not just reveal potentially serious crimes perpetrated by the government -- including possible <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/james_clapper_must_go/">perjury</a>, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/put_the_nsa_on_trial/">unlawful spying</a> and <a href="http://www.ibtimes.com/fisc-will-not-object-release-2011-court-opinion-confirmed-nsas-illegal-surveillance-1305023">unconstitutional surveillance</a>. They also laid bare in historic fashion the powerful double standards that now define most U.S. media coverage of the American government -- the kind that portray those who challenge power as criminals, and those who worship it as heroes deserving legal immunity. Indeed, after "Meet the Press" host David Gregory's instantly notorious performance yesterday, it is clear Snowden's revelations so brazenly exposed these double standards that it will be difficult for the Washington press corps to ever successfully hide them again.</p><p>The best way to see these double standards is to ponder 10 simple questions.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/why_shouldnt_david_gregory_be_charged_with_a_crime/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/why_shouldnt_david_gregory_be_charged_with_a_crime/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>254</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sunday shows: What you missed</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/23/sunday_shows_what_you_missed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/23/sunday_shows_what_you_missed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jun 2013 16:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meet the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[face the nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[This Week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbs news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political pundits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Stephanopoulos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Schieffer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david gregory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scandals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunday morning shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunday shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunday morning show roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Farm Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Snowden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whistleblower]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13333592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Punditry experts of "Meet the Press," "This Week" and "Face the Nation" prosecute Snowden and Greenwald]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week, on a Breaking News! edition of the Sunday shows: Where is Edward Snowden right now? <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/23/edward_snowden_departs_hong_kong_on_flight_to_moscow/singleton/" target="_blank">(He's on a plane to Moscow.)</a> Where will Edward Snowden be going next, then? He's fast, Edward Snowden. And the most important question of all: should Glenn Greenwald go to jail for having Edward Snowden as a source, and also for having an annoying tone sometimes? ABC's "This Week," NBC's "Meet the Press," and CBS' "Face the Nation" will solve these questions, and more.</p><p>First up, "This Week": Fast Eddie Snowden is hot on the move. How does he keep "bedeviling" US officials like this? It's a "cat-and-mouse game," and the U.S. "lost this round," says the breaking news correspondent.</p><p>Host George Stephanopoulos is now talking to Gen. Keith Alexander, director of the NSA. Mister General, Stephanopoulos asks, how did you let this guy out of Hawaii in the first place? Alexander is mentioning 9/11 and how Edward Snowden is making us vulnerable. "We are now putting in place systems" to track those with high-level security clearances. For example: "We've changed our passwords." Good luck, hackers.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/23/sunday_shows_what_you_missed/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/23/sunday_shows_what_you_missed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sunday shows solve Syria and government surveillance!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/sunday_shows_solve_syria_and_government_surveillance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/sunday_shows_solve_syria_and_government_surveillance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meet the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[face the nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[This Week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbs news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pundits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Stephanopoulos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Schieffer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david gregory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scandals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunday morning shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunday shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunday morning show roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13327174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The punditry experts of "Meet the Press," "This Week" and "Face the Nation" unlock geopolitical puzzles in minutes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today on the Sunday Shows: War in Syria. The U.S. arming "the rebels." The Surveillance State. A world of terror, danger, chaos and impending doom. And so ABC's "This Week," NBC's "Meet the Press" and CBS' "Face the Nation" will seek to answer the metaquestion: Are you proud of us, Daddy?</p><p>First, and solely because it starts a half-hour earlier than the other shows, we'll check out "This Week," where Jonathan Karl is substituting for George Stephanopoulos. "Is the U.S. going to get involved in another war in the Middle East?" Always, Jonathan Karl, always. Let's see what Marco Rubio has to say.</p><p>Rubio, a war-friendly Republican, says that President Obama blew it by waiting so long to get <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/obama_bolsters_military_aid_to_syrian_rebels_ap/" target="_blank">involved in Syria.</a> (Assuming <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/what_you_need_to_know_about_the_developing_syria_situation/" target="_blank">this really is</a> the broad change in strategy it's been billed as.) <em>Now</em> who are we giving arms to? Al-Qaida "elements." What would President Rubio have done? Karl asks. Well, Rubio <em>never</em> would have allowed it to get to this point, of course. If Rubio were president, Syria would be a sunny democratic Utopia already, because he would have managed it so perfectly, you just have no idea how perfectly President Rubio would have done things.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/sunday_shows_solve_syria_and_government_surveillance/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/sunday_shows_solve_syria_and_government_surveillance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sunday Shows meet Glenn Greenwald!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/09/sunday_shows_meet_glenn_greenwald/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/09/sunday_shows_meet_glenn_greenwald/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2013 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meet the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[This Week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[face the nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbs news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pundits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Stephanopoulos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david gregory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Schieffer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scandals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunday morning shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunday shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunday morning show roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Greenwald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Espionage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13320420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The punditry experts of "This Week" and "Face the Nation" try to process the Guardian writer's spying revelations]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to your recap of this week's "Sunday shows," where the hot topic is how <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/06/government_collects_millions_of_phone_records_daily/">the government has access</a> to everyone's phone and Facebook and video sex chats all the time, EVERYONE FREAK OUT, NOW. We'll be watching ABC's "This Week," NBC's "Meet the Press" and CBS' "Face the Nation," and yes, in that priority order.</p><p>"This Week" promises to be a grand old time, as some producer has let civil liberties reporter and commentator Glenn"zilla" Greenwald on national television again to scorch the earth. Greenwald, of course, has been the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/profile/glenn-greenwald">lead reporter</a> behind a number of top-secret <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/06/nsa-phone-records-verizon-court-order">leak</a> <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/06/us-tech-giants-nsa-data">reports</a> <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/07/obama-china-targets-cyber-overseas">this week.</a></p><p>"You are really on a roll," George Stephanopoulos congratulates Greenwald, of "the Guardian newspaper." (Full disclosure: I am a contributor to the Guardian U.S.) What are the key findings of your stories this week? Greenwald, talking super-fast to get it all in, has two. From the transcript:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/09/sunday_shows_meet_glenn_greenwald/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/09/sunday_shows_meet_glenn_greenwald/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>75</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Watching the Sunday shows so you don&#8217;t have to</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/02/watching_the_sunday_shows_so_you_dont_have_to_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/02/watching_the_sunday_shows_so_you_dont_have_to_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jun 2013 17:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunday morning show roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunday morning shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meet the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[face the nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[This Week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scandals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13315345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The experts of Meet the Press, Face the Nation and This Week solve the Syria, Holder and IRS crises in mere minutes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to this week's Funday Shows recap, a look at all the hot chatter on NBC's <em>Meet the Press</em>, CBS's <em>Face the Nation</em>, and ABC's <em>This Week. </em>The topics under discussion this week include: Is Eric Holder the worst human being in history? Has he killed off any remaining semblance of Freedom of the Press in this country? Why aren't we bombing Syria yet? Are IRS employees dancing too much, and are we not going out of our way to humiliate them enough?</p><p>"SUNDAY SHOWDOWN!" George Stephanopoulos greets us, to open <em>This Week</em>. It's a political consultant versus another political consultant! Whose talking points will win? "Let's get right to it" with David Plouffe versus Karl Rove, before you even have time to run to the bathroom. Arianna Huffington, Gwen Ifill and the WSJ editorial page's Paul Gigot watch from the other side of the table.</p><p>Stephanopoulos shows poll numbers that indicate the public doesn't especially care about any of The Scandals, today's hot lead. <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/05/30/poll-americans-want-special-prosecutor-for-irs-scandal/" target="_blank">Forty-four percent</a> find the IRS targeting scandal the most important, however. And Karl Rove says if you look "inside the numbers," the public is still very unhappy with the economy. And the IRS collects taxes from the <em>economy</em>, so there you go: biggest scandal ever, searingly pertinent to all.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/02/watching_the_sunday_shows_so_you_dont_have_to_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/02/watching_the_sunday_shows_so_you_dont_have_to_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Schumer predicts immigration reform will pass by July 4</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/02/schumer_predicts_immigration_reform_will_pass_by_july_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/02/schumer_predicts_immigration_reform_will_pass_by_july_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jun 2013 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration overhaul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizenship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigrants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Schumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gang of 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meet the press]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13315318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Schumer is optimistic about immigration reform passing, but a majority of Americans do not share his rosy view ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A confident Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) told David Gregory on "Meet the Press" on Sunday that he is optimistic Congress, though dysfunctional as ever and bitterly divided over <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/28/alex_pareene_on_the_gops_scandal_fetish/" target="_blank">not-so-scandalous</a> scandals, will still pull together to pass immigration reform.</p><p>“We’re going to put immigration on the [Senate] floor starting on June 10. I predict it will pass the Senate by July 4. We are hoping to get 70 votes, up to 70 votes, which means a lot of Republicans. And we’re willing to entertain amendments that don’t damage the core principles of the bill, but improve the bill – just as we did in [the Judiciary] committee.”</p><p>“These so-called scandals have not diverted us one iota” from immigration reform, he added.</p><p>Despite Schumer's rosy view of his colleague's ability to work together, a majority of voters do not believe Congress will pass the measure, even though 54 percent of Americans support immigration overhaul, as NBC News <a href="http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/05/31/18655943-poll-majority-of-voters-say-immigration-bill-wont-pass?lite" target="_blank">reports</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/02/schumer_predicts_immigration_reform_will_pass_by_july_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/02/schumer_predicts_immigration_reform_will_pass_by_july_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three scandals, Beltway style</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/beltway_plays_scandal_grills_dan_pfeiffer_on_the_word_irrelevant/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/beltway_plays_scandal_grills_dan_pfeiffer_on_the_word_irrelevant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunday shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Pfeiffer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[This Week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meet the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Schieffer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Woodward]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13303037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, AP phone logs. In DC's game of scandal, you lose to the IRS and Benghazi!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan Pfeiffer, a Senior Adviser to the president for strategy and communications, <a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2013/05/dan-pfeiffer-explains-irs-scandal/65379/">did all the Sunday shows last week</a>, in an effort to address the troika of scandals that Washington is currently fixated on. It was probably the best thing the White House could've done, on a morning when those shows were inevitably going to be full of gleeful piling on. It was also just adding fuel to the fire. The political press is in scandal coverage mode and as long as Congress plays along nothing can shut the machine off until each scandal runs its course.</p><p>Let's recap the scandals, in case you have been too busy having message board debates about Star Trek or deciphering new Kanye lyrics to pay attention:</p><p>1. Benghazi. Republicans insist the White House did something evil and incomprehensible involving talking points following the September 11, 2012 attack on the American consulate in the Lybian city. Recently, the White House released an email chain showing the process of drafting and revising the talking points.<br /> 2. The IRS. The IRS reportedly targeted conservative nonprofits for extra scrutiny of their tax-exempt status.<br /> 3. The Associated Press. The Justice Department sought access to, and received, a massive trove of phone data of AP journalists, as part of its investigation into a leak.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/beltway_plays_scandal_grills_dan_pfeiffer_on_the_word_irrelevant/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/beltway_plays_scandal_grills_dan_pfeiffer_on_the_word_irrelevant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Peggy Noonan hears a dog whistle</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/obamas_shocking_reverse_dog_whistle_politics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/obamas_shocking_reverse_dog_whistle_politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peggy Noonan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandalgate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meet the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Gregpry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizens United]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lee Atwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Karl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Woodward]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13302993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How desperate is GOP? It now fantasizes that Obama’s campaign was a coded order to the IRS to target the Tea Party]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here’s the best evidence the GOP knows the IRS scandal doesn’t reach into the White House: Now they’re saying they don’t need to find evidence that President Obama directed or even knew about the investigation of Tea Party groups’ non-profit status; his actively campaigning for reelection represented a “dog whistle” to tell the agency to target his political enemies.</p><p>The dog whistle quote came via NBC's “Meet the Press” Sunday from Peggy Noonan, who can no longer be taken seriously as a writer or pundit. When host David Gregory pressed her on the lack of evidence for her claims that the IRS scandal was worse than Watergate, Noonan insisted that the president “was giving a dog whistle to people who could launch this thing." The former Reagan-Bush speechwriter vividly summed up, in her thousand points of crazy style, where the IRS “scandal” went over the last few days: Obama didn’t need to order the tax agency to harass Tea Party groups (and his critics don’t need proof that he did so): his criticizing the group during the 2012 campaign, as well as blasting the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision, represented an implicit order to do so.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/obamas_shocking_reverse_dog_whistle_politics/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/obamas_shocking_reverse_dog_whistle_politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>117</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>David Gregory irate about soda, meh on civil rights</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/does_tv_news_care_more_about_soda_than_civil_rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/does_tv_news_care_more_about_soda_than_civil_rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 13:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jake Tapper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meet the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Letterman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Late Show With David Letterman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13250760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In national interviews, Mayor Bloomberg gets grilled about beverage sizes. His stop-and-frisk policy? Not so much]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In New York City, Mayor Michael Bloomberg's NYPD is stopping large numbers of innocent people walking down the street each day -- questioning them as to their whereabouts and invasively frisking their bodies in a hunt for weapons and drugs. The stops are almost entirely (<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/23/nyregion/fighting-stop-and-frisk-tactic-but-hitting-racial-divide.html?_r=0">nearly nine in 10</a>) targeting young black and Latino men. The overwhelming majority of those stopped are doing nothing wrong (just <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/09/opinion/stop-and-frisk-in-new-york-city.html">6 percent of stops lead to arrests</a>, and a small fraction of those <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/26/nyregion/in-the-bronx-resistance-to-prosecuting-stop-and-frisk-arrests.html?pagewanted=all">are ever prosecuted</a>). And it's having a deleterious effect on the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/video/2012/06/12/opinion/100000001601732/the-scars-of-stop-and-frisk.html">psyche of the targets</a> (as well as <a href="http://colorlines.com/archives/2013/03/heres_why_new_york_citys_stop-and-frisk_trial_is_really_important.html">community relations with police)</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/does_tv_news_care_more_about_soda_than_civil_rights/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/does_tv_news_care_more_about_soda_than_civil_rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Sunday Shows take on guns and gays</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/the_sunday_shows_take_on_guns_and_gays/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/the_sunday_shows_take_on_guns_and_gays/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2013 20:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Sunday Shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Brooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david gregory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meet the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[face the nation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13250580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today. more Iraq War salesmen hype the Iran threat and David Gregory stands up for the right to drink soda]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One interesting thing I've noted since I started watching the mostly wretched Sunday shows is that for the most part there is not much debate, between the liberal and conservative panel mainstays, on gay marriage. Everyone is in favor of it or not inclined to strongly oppose it. So in order to have a proper right-vs-left Sunday Show Debate on the matter, two of the shows today were forced to bring in outspoken bigots. National embarrassments Tony Perkins and Ralph Reed both gamely answered the call, and defended "traditional marriage" from the inevitable march of widespread acceptance of gays and lesbians.</p><p>First, though, ABC's "This Week," the only one of the big three shows this morning to have another idiotic debate about budgets, began with George Stephanopoulos actually bragging -- bragging! -- that he had both Jim Messina <em>and</em> Karl Rove. Oh boy, two campaign strategists! When I am looking for well-considered and thoughtful commentary on national issues, I always turn to people who are good at managing political campaigns.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/the_sunday_shows_take_on_guns_and_gays/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/the_sunday_shows_take_on_guns_and_gays/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jeb Bush: Political reporters are like &#8220;crack addicts&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/jeb_bush_political_reporters_are_like_crack_addicts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/jeb_bush_political_reporters_are_like_crack_addicts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 11:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeb Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meet the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13225001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former Florida governor reflects on the rampant speculation over the 2016 elections]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush on Sunday likened political reporters to "crack addicts" and "heroin addicts" during a tour of morning talk shows that drew repeated questions about the still-distant 2016 presidential election.</p><p>Bush, capping a media-heavy week that sparked chatter about a presidential campaign for a third member of his family, tried to keep the conversation focused on his book "Immigration Wars." But as Bush wrapped up a conversation with NBC's David Gregory," he likened journalists and their questions about the 2016 campaign to drug addicts.</p><p>"Who's the hottest Florida politician right now? Is it you or Marco Rubio?" Gregory asked, referring to Rubio, a senator who is also a potential GOP contender. "Who are we more likely to see in the White House?"</p><p>"Man, you guys are crack addicts. You really are obsessed with all this politics," Bush replied.</p><p>The "Meet the Press" host interrupted, saying he'd been called a lot of things, but never a crack addict.</p><p>"OK, heroin addict. Is that better?" shot back Bush, the son of former President George H.W. Bush and brother of former President George W. Bush.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/jeb_bush_political_reporters_are_like_crack_addicts/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/jeb_bush_political_reporters_are_like_crack_addicts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Watching the Sunday shows so you don&#8217;t have to</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/24/watching_the_sunday_shows_so_you_dont_have_to/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/24/watching_the_sunday_shows_so_you_dont_have_to/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2013 19:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunday shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david gregory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meet the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peggy Noonan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[george will]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harold Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13210528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, some centrist pundits and legislators solved the sequester by demanding "balance" and "leadership"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here's what I learned this morning on "the Sunday shows," the three network news panel programs that define the parameters of the national debate for elite Washington: No one wants the sequester to happen, if the sequester happens it will be because Barack Obama failed to show leadership, what we need is a "balanced approach" to deficit reduction, the sequester should happen but in a smarter way, video games may not cause violence but they are gross, and "Zero Dark Thirty" is the best film of the year in part because John McCain disliked it.</p><p>I don't watch the Sunday shows. Basically ever. I watch clips if something particularly stupid happened, but for the most part, you can get everything you need to know about what happens on these shows by reading <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/24/sunday-morning-liveblog_n_2753278.html?utm_hp_ref=eat-the-press">the brilliant liveblog by the Huffington Post's Jason Linkins</a>, America's foremost Sunday show interpreter. While no one <em>should</em> pay attention to these shows, as long as <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_4_the_sunday_shows/">millions of Americans watch them under the mistaken impression that they're seeing serious discussions of our most pressing issues with our wisest media observers and most influential political leaders</a>, they should probably be monitored.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/24/watching_the_sunday_shows_so_you_dont_have_to/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/24/watching_the_sunday_shows_so_you_dont_have_to/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sunday best: Gun control, ZDT and Paul Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/27/sunday_best_gun_control_zdt_and_paul_ryan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/27/sunday_best_gun_control_zdt_and_paul_ryan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 20:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero Dark Thirty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dianne Feinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meet the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mark boal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[face the nation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13183424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A series of opaque interviews on today's Sunday shows]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This morning's political shows featured unrepentant talk on gun control, "Zero Dark Thirty" and the return of Rep. Paul Ryan (R.-Wis.):</p><p>CBS:</p><p>“<a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/face-the-nation/">Face the Nation</a>” highlighted a series of views on gun control. New York City police commissioner Ray Kelly, whose job involves fighting crime, said universal background checks on gun sales could have a measurable impact. “About 6 million weapons estimated were sold last year without a background check. So that’s a significant, that’s the loophole that they talk about. I think the background check will also be helpful in identifying store purchases, making them more aware of the fact that their now on record and you can record purchases that they make.”</p><p>Universal background checks aren’t the bills in play right now. (Or at least <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2013/01/24/real-movement-joe-manchin-nra-darling-comes-out-for-universal-background-checks/">not yet</a>.) Instead, Senator Dianne Feinstein (D.-Calif.) defended the prospects of the assault weapons ban that she is sponsoring "because the American people are very much for it, " even though she acknowledged that it confronts an “uphill battle” to become law.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/27/sunday_best_gun_control_zdt_and_paul_ryan/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/27/sunday_best_gun_control_zdt_and_paul_ryan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sunday show roundup</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/20/sunday_show_roundup_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/20/sunday_show_roundup_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 18:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunday show roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News Sunday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meet the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david plouffe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Axelrod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State of the Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[face the nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roy blunt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13177020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Second term priorities, gun control and the Hagel nomination]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While both the president and VP were sworn in for their second term in intimate ceremonies ahead of the public extravaganza Monday, the debates du jour continued on the Sunday talk shows.</p><p><strong>Gun control:</strong></p><p>The head of the National Rifle Association David Keene, in an interview on CNN's "State of the Union," was confident that efforts to ban assault rifles and high-capacity ammunition weapons would fail.</p><p>"I'm willing to say that guns in this country have as much influence as they always have, and perhaps more," he told host Candy Crawley.</p><p>Appearing on CBS' "Face the Nation," Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.V.) -- a Congressman with strong NRA support -- urged an approach to curtailing gun violence that does not focus just on guns. "If you're just going to say it's all about guns, and we need gun changes and bans, then you're wrong," he said, noting that he and Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) would be sponsoring a bill to launch a commission on "mass violence," which would look at cultural depictions of violence, mental health care as well as gun control.</p><p>Obama's senior adviser David Plouffe, who made the talk show rounds Sunday, told "State of the Union" that he believed there to be "consensus on Capitol Hill" over gun control.  "We think we can get 60 votes in the Senate and 218 [votes in the House],” Plouffe said.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/20/sunday_show_roundup_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/20/sunday_show_roundup_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>David Gregory won&#8217;t be charged for displaying ammunition clip</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/13/david_gregory_wont_be_charged_for_displaying_ammunition_clip/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/13/david_gregory_wont_be_charged_for_displaying_ammunition_clip/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 18:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Gregpry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meet the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun magazine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13169680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The D.C. attorney general says charging the "Meet the Press" host "would not promote public safety" ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NBC's David Gregory will not face charges for exhibiting a 30-round magazine for an assault rifle on "Meet The Press" last month in violation of D.C. law, according to the D.C. attorney general.</p><p>In a letter to NBC, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/crime/nbcs-gregory-wont-be-charged-for-displaying-ammunition-clip-on-tv/2013/01/11/984a7bda-5c1d-11e2-beee-6e38f5215402_story.html">obtained</a> by the Washington Post, Attorney General Irvin B. Nathan said he decided to use “prosecutorial discretion” and not bring charges against Gregory, because “Prosecution would not promote public safety in the District of Columbia, nor serve the best interests of the people."</p><p>But, Nathan warned:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/13/david_gregory_wont_be_charged_for_displaying_ammunition_clip/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/13/david_gregory_wont_be_charged_for_displaying_ammunition_clip/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sunday show roundup: Obama braces for impact</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/sunday_show_roundup_obama_braces_for_impact/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/sunday_show_roundup_obama_braces_for_impact/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunday shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunday show roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunday morning shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meet the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13157812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On "Meet the Press," Obama finally lays responsibility for the fiscal cliff mess on Republicans]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In clearest sign yet that President Obama has abandoned hope of averting the so-called fiscal cliff in the next 48 hours, he used a rare-Sunday show appearance to come out swinging at Republicans, something he’s so far avoided doing so as to not poison relations with his negotiating partners.</p><p>On “Meet the Press” today, all pretense was gone and diplomacy jettisoned as Obama placed the blame for a potential cliff dive squarely on Republican intransigence. “The only thing I would caution against, David, is I think this notion of, ‘Well, both sides are just kind of unwilling to cooperate.’ And that's just not true,” Obama told host David Gregory.</p><p>“I mean if you look at the facts, what you have is a situation here where the Democratic Party, warts and all, and certainly me, warts and all, have consistently done our best to try to put country first,” he added, paraphrasing John McCain’s 2008 presidential campaign slogan. The clear implication: Republicans have <em>not</em> put country first, prioritizing ideology instead.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/sunday_show_roundup_obama_braces_for_impact/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/sunday_show_roundup_obama_braces_for_impact/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>83</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama vows to support gun legislation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/obama_vows_to_support_gun_legislation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/obama_vows_to_support_gun_legislation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 15:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown school shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meet the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david gregory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13157751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president also pointed finger at Republicans over fiscal cliff stalemate during "Meet the Press" appearance]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During his Sunday appearance on NBC's "Meet the Press," President Obama vowed to support legislative efforts to curtail gun violence in the wake of the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre.</p><p>"I think there are a vast majority of responsible gun owners out there who recognize that we can't have a situation in which somebody with severe psychological problems is able to get the kind of high capacity weapons that this individual in Newtown obtained and gun down our kids. And, yes, it's going to be hard," Obama told host David Gregory, recalling the day he heard of the murder of 20 children in Connecticut as the worst day of his presidency.</p><p>Obama also discussed fiscal cliff negotiations. He repeatedly placed the blame on Republicans for failure to reach a compromise, noting the GOP "had trouble saying yes to a number of repeated offers." In contrast, the president defended his own record of spending cuts, telling Gregory:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/obama_vows_to_support_gun_legislation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/obama_vows_to_support_gun_legislation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The real lesson in David Gregory&#8217;s gun incident</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/the_real_lesson_in_david_gregorys_gun_incident/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/the_real_lesson_in_david_gregorys_gun_incident/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 14:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meet the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david gregory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13156385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gun laws are so easy to break -- and such a state-by-state mess -- that it's hard for any jurisdiction to get tough]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Meet the Press" host David Gregory is in hot water after brandishing a 30-round magazine for an assault rifle on national TV last Sunday while interviewing NRA head Wayne LaPierre, apparently unaware that the District of Columbia, where he filmed the segment, bans such equipment. Other journalists have <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2012/12/disdain-for-the-david-gregory-story-152840.html">scoffed</a> at the controversy, and even the NRA has dismissed it as “<a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2012/12/nra-head-gregorys-silly-felony-85531.html?hp=r14">silly</a>,” but D.C. police are apparently taking the matter seriously, saying they are <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/12/25/washington-d-c-police-investigating-whether-nbc-moderator-violated-law/">investigating</a> the incident.</p><p>“I really think what David Gregory did while he was inadvertently flouting the law was illustrating in a very graphic, perhaps not intentionally, but in a graphic way <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2012/12/nra-head-gregorys-silly-felony-85531.html#ixzz2GLYc92gg">just how silly some of these laws are</a>,” NRA President David Keene said yesterday. We don’t often say this, but the NRA is absolutely right.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/the_real_lesson_in_david_gregorys_gun_incident/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/the_real_lesson_in_david_gregorys_gun_incident/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did David Gregory break gun-control law on &#8220;Meet the Press&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/did_david_gregory_break_gun_control_law_on_meet_the_press/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/did_david_gregory_break_gun_control_law_on_meet_the_press/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 14:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Gregpry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meet the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13154725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATE: D.C. police warned NBC not to show the magazine clip on air; host could face year in prison]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When "Meet the Press" host David Gregory showed National Rifle Association chief Wayne LaPierre what looked like a 30-round gun magazine during their contentious interview Sunday morning, the NBC journalist may have broken the law.</p><p>Gregory was aggressively questioning LaPierre about whether he would support any new gun control laws when he may have run afoul of some which already exist in the District of Columbia.</p><p>And now, <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2012/12/cops-probe-nbc-gregory-on-gun-clip-85481.html?hp=r5">according to a report in Politico, </a>Washington, D.C., police are investigating.</p><p>“The Metropolitan Police Department is investigating this matter,” said police officer and spokesman Araz Alali in an interview Tuesday. “There are D.C. code violations, D.C. code restrictions on guns, ammunition. We are investigating this matter. Beyond the scope of that, I can’t comment any further,” he said.</p><p><a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2012/12/cops-probe-nbc-gregory-on-gun-clip-85481.html?hp=r5">As Politico notes,</a> D.C. has a restrictive gun control law -- and it's possible that whoever purchased or possessed the magazine could have crossed the line.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/did_david_gregory_break_gun_control_law_on_meet_the_press/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/did_david_gregory_break_gun_control_law_on_meet_the_press/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LaPierre: Foaming at the mouth</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/lapierre_foaming_at_the_mouth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/lapierre_foaming_at_the_mouth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 19:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wayne lapierre foaming at the mouth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meet the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13153877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With his spittle-y turn on "Meet The Press," NRA's big dog hands critics a dream metaphor]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[embedtweet id="282867364159160320"]<br /> [embedtweet id="282875264197853185"]<br /> [embedtweet id="282875432297185280"]<br /> [embedtweet id="282875191292465154"]<br /> [embedtweet id="282874956012982273"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="282892596647452672"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="282873543581134849"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="282853132592099328"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="282911792492052482"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="282874745949679616"]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/lapierre_foaming_at_the_mouth/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/lapierre_foaming_at_the_mouth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>99</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>