<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Michael Bloomberg</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/michael_bloomberg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Michael Bloomberg plays the endorsement game again</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/02/michael_bloomberg_plays_the_endorsement_game_again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/02/michael_bloomberg_plays_the_endorsement_game_again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 16:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12913471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The billionaire mayor meets with Mitt Romney as both campaigns practically beg him for his support]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitt Romney yesterday had <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/burns-haberman/2012/05/romney-and-bloomberg-meet-in-nyc-122151.html">a "private" (well-publicized) meeting</a> with New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg that was a pretty obvious attempt by Romney to win the for-some-reason "coveted" Bloomberg endorsement. Mayor Bloomberg is not actually the hugely popular and universally respected national figure that anti-partisanship zealot pundits think he is -- <a href="http://publicpolicypolling.blogspot.com/2010/11/americans-not-impressed-with-bloomberg.html">only around 20 percent of Americans viewed him favorably in 2010</a>, and a 2011 poll says he'd get <a href="http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2011/08/third-party-bids-would-help-obama.html">a mere 10 percent of the vote</a> in a three-way presidential race -- but those anti-partisanship zealots represent an important constituency of "rich people who run the media," so a Bloomberg endorsement would be a strong signal that Romney is moderate and wise and prudent and so on.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/02/michael_bloomberg_plays_the_endorsement_game_again/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/02/michael_bloomberg_plays_the_endorsement_game_again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thomas Friedman: America&#8217;s escalator is broken and only Mike Bloomberg can repair it</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/18/thomas_friedman_americas_escalator_is_broken_and_only_mike_bloomberg_can_repair_it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/18/thomas_friedman_americas_escalator_is_broken_and_only_mike_bloomberg_can_repair_it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America's Broken Escalator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Third Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Friedman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12883031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The dumbest columnist in the world calls for Mayor Mike to save America with third-party pixie dust]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas Friedman, globe-trotting superstar New York Times columnist and America's foremost Big Thinker, noticed recently that America is Broken, and by "America" he means an escalator, in a parking garage, at the train station in Washington. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/18/opinion/friedman-one-for-the-country.html?_r=2&amp;ref=opinion">There is only one man who can fix this escalator that represents America</a>: Famed escalator repairman and billionaire mogul Mike Bloomberg.</p><blockquote><p>I had to catch a train in Washington last week. The paved street in the traffic circle around Union Station was in such poor condition that I felt as though I was on a roller coaster. I traveled on the Amtrak Acela, our sorry excuse for a fast train, on which I had so many dropped calls on my cellphone that you’d have thought I was on a remote desert island, not traveling from Washington to New York City. When I got back to Union Station, the escalator in the parking garage was broken. Maybe you’ve gotten used to all this and have stopped noticing. I haven’t. Our country needs a renewal.</p>
<p>And that is why I still hope Michael Bloomberg will reconsider running for president as an independent candidate, if only to participate in the presidential debates and give our two-party system the shock it needs.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/18/thomas_friedman_americas_escalator_is_broken_and_only_mike_bloomberg_can_repair_it/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/18/thomas_friedman_americas_escalator_is_broken_and_only_mike_bloomberg_can_repair_it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>107</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mayor Bloomberg personally cheers up Goldman Sachs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/16/mayor_bloomberg_personally_cheers_up_goldman_sachs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/16/mayor_bloomberg_personally_cheers_up_goldman_sachs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12683361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mayor Mike Bloomberg visits the firm's HQ to tell bankers that they're wonderful people and everyone loves them]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Wednesday, accomplished table tennis player Greg Smith <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/14/opinion/why-i-am-leaving-goldman-sachs.html?_r=3&amp;pagewanted=all">announced in a New York Times Op-Ed</a> that he was quitting his job at investment firm Goldman Sachs, because the firm's "culture" has become, at some point in the last 12 years, "toxic." Goldman Sachs responded with a spirited P.R. campaign in which it claimed that Smith was not actually a very important person to the firm, and a leaked memo from Lloyd Blankfein in which he argued that Goldman could not possibly be evil because a recent internal survey proved that Goldman employees enjoy working at Goldman.</p><p>Despite that very good spin, Goldman Sachs lost $2 billion worth of market value as its shares fell 3.4 in trading over the course of the day ("oh man, some guy says Goldman Sachs is evil? I HAD NO IDEA" -- the market). Thankfully, one hero stands ready to defend Goldman Sachs from public scorn: New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/16/mayor_bloomberg_personally_cheers_up_goldman_sachs/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/16/mayor_bloomberg_personally_cheers_up_goldman_sachs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NY press corps yuks it up with Bloomberg</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/08/ny_press_corps_yucks_it_up_with_bloomberg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/08/ny_press_corps_yucks_it_up_with_bloomberg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10302922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After the arrest of 26 journalists at Zuccotti Park, the mayor jokes about it with reporters]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>[UPDATED BELOW]</strong></p><p>On Tuesday, one lucky group of New York City journalists were treated to an evening of drinks, pizza squares, and funny gift exchanges at Mayor Michael Bloomberg's annual Holiday Party for local press.</p><p>In attendance this year were reporters from the New York Times, the New York Post, the New York Daily News, CBS, Fox, and other outlets. The journalists, no doubt straining to retain their “objectivity” throughout, were able to schmooze with dignitaries such as Bloomberg’s longtime partner Diana Taylor (who sits on the Board of Directors for Brookfield Properties, the retail firm that partially owns Zuccotti Park) and Paul Browne, spokesperson for the New York City Police Department.</p><p>Bloomberg made sure to crack a few jokes at the expense of Occupy Wall Street, whose encampment he ordered forcibly cleared on November 15, by way of a surprise paramilitary style raid. Reporters attempting to cover the police action were harassed, assaulted, and barred from viewing the area -- for their own protection, Bloomberg later <a href="http://www.capitalnewyork.com/article/culture/2011/11/4156011/bloomberg-reporters-were-blocked-zuccotti-park-their-own-safety">claimed</a>. (Congressman Jerrold Nadler, who represents the Financial District, has since <a href="http://nadler.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=1787&amp;Itemid=132">called on</a><a href="http://nadler.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=1787&amp;Itemid=132"> Attorney General Eric Holder to launch an investigation.)</a> All told, police arrested at least ten journalists.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/08/ny_press_corps_yucks_it_up_with_bloomberg/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/08/ny_press_corps_yucks_it_up_with_bloomberg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mayor Bloomberg&#8217;s army</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/01/mayor_bloombergs_army/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/01/mayor_bloombergs_army/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10276465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The mayor of New York and his police commissioner reveal just how comfortable they are with autocracy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Billionaire New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg <a href="http://www.politickerny.com/2011/11/30/mayor-bloomberg-i-have-my-own-army-11-30-11/">has his own army!</a> No, it's not a private security firm, like Blackwater. It's actually, according to the mayor, the New York City Police Department.</p><p>Bloomberg, again threatening vaguely to make that presidential run that the American people are decidedly not calling for, told MIT last night that he doesn't even <em>need</em> to be president, because all of his autocratic desires are fulfilled by running America's most populous city as his private fiefdom.</p><blockquote><p>“I have my own army in the NYPD, which is the seventh biggest army in the world. I have my own State Department, much to Foggy Bottom’s annoyance. We have the United Nations in New York, and so we have an entree into the diplomatic world that Washington does not have,” Mayor Bloomberg said.</p></blockquote><p>I'm not entirely sure what he means by having his own "State Department." The city's <a href="http://nymag.com/news/features/tourism/tourist-increase-2011-12/">independent nonprofit tourism agency, maybe?</a> But he didn't mention that his army also comes with its own international (and questionably legal) <a href="http://hosted.ap.org/interactives/2011/nypd-intel/index.html">intelligence-gathering apparatus</a>, just like the CIA and FBI, except without any sort of oversight, congressional or otherwise.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/01/mayor_bloombergs_army/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/01/mayor_bloombergs_army/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liberty Park can be anywhere</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/16/liberty_park_can_be_anywhere/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/16/liberty_park_can_be_anywhere/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zuccotti Park]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10228127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Occupy movement has much to gain from its symbolic eviction. But only if it evolves beyond Zuccotti]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forcibly dispersed in the wee, dark hours of Nov. 15, as pesky journalists were shoved away by the police, the occupants of Zuccotti Park -- aka Liberty Square -- were surely reminded that Michael Bloomberg was not only the mayor but, when all was said and done, possibly the best-known 1-percenter in Greater New York.</p><p>The mayor held a press conference later to say:  “The First Amendment protects speech.  It doesn’t protect the use of tents and sleeping bags to take over a public space.”  Previously, the mayor had declared:  “New York City is the city where you can come and express yourself.  What was happening in Zuccotti Park was not that.”  The protesters, he went on, had taken over the park, “making it unavailable to anyone else.”  I suppose it could be said that any demonstration makes a given space “unavailable to anyone else.”  And as for “expressing yourself,” well, that’s not what the First Amendment says, either.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/16/liberty_park_can_be_anywhere/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/16/liberty_park_can_be_anywhere/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Daily News cheers Occupy Wall Street raid, until Daily News reporter is arrested</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/15/daily_news_cheers_occupy_wall_street_raid_until_daily_news_reporter_is_arrested/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/15/daily_news_cheers_occupy_wall_street_raid_until_daily_news_reporter_is_arrested/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 18:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10222530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Bravo" says New York newspaper to NYPD eviction, just before the NYPD jails one of their own]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the NYPD, on Mayor Michael Bloomberg's orders, raided and evicted Occupy Wall Street from Zuccotti Park last night, the editors of the New York Daily News, the city's ostensibly liberal tabloid newspaper, cheered.</p><p><a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/bravo-bloomberg-s-occupy-wall-street-eviction-zuccotti-park-finally-reclaiming-public-space-unsanitary-shantytown-article-1.977734">"Bravo to Bloomberg's Occupy Wall Street eviction,"</a> goes the headline on its editorial published this morning.</p><p>The fact that the eviction was done in violation of a court order doesn't bother them:</p><blockquote><p>The amorphous agglomeration known as Occupy Wall Street had transformed a space intended for open community access into a round-the-clock shantytown — and they claimed that the First Amendment guaranteed their right to do as they pleased.</p>
<p>This is not constitutional wisdom. This is self-important, self-indulgent bilge. And a Manhattan Supreme Court justice who ordered a halt to the eviction pending a hearing needs to emphatically so state.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/15/daily_news_cheers_occupy_wall_street_raid_until_daily_news_reporter_is_arrested/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/15/daily_news_cheers_occupy_wall_street_raid_until_daily_news_reporter_is_arrested/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The autocratic response to OWS</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/21/ows_bloomberg_hickenlooper/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/21/ows_bloomberg_hickenlooper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10131034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mayor Bloomberg, Gov. Hickenlooper and others scramble to find ways to discourage these peaceful protests]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hear ye, hear ye! Let it be known that in this 10th month of the first year of His Majesty King John Hickenlooper's reign, the sovereign governor of the Kingdom of Colorado handed down an edict closing the grounds of the Capitol palace to the public and ordering his praetorian guard to arrest the peaceful Occupy Denver protesters assembled at the castle gates.</p><p>This royal order, which made big headlines last week, was all about intimidating imagery. Just as King John had hoped, the iconic photograph to emerge from the sweep was a front-page Denver Post photo of a heavily armed police officer menacingly guarding the Capitol -- a deliberate visual message telling the despot's subjects to retreat or face consequences. He later told a reporter that he was aiming to preemptively crush "something that could easily catch on."</p><p>Back on the East Coast, it was much the same, as His Majesty King Michael Bloomberg issued a decree stating that as a benevolent despot, he would "allow" his Manhattan subjects to occupy Wall Street (as if the mayor has the power to grant -- or withhold -- democratic rights). But then King Mike quickly sent his police force in for mass arrests, standing down only after a wave of outrage from the larger serfdom watching on television.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/21/ows_bloomberg_hickenlooper/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/21/ows_bloomberg_hickenlooper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bloomberg sets up confrontation with occupiers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/13/bloomberg_sets_up_confrontation_with_occupiers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/13/bloomberg_sets_up_confrontation_with_occupiers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 13:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10110339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mayor's plan to have the NYPD clear protesters from Zuccotti Park for cleaning on Friday is met with skepticism]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like Friday is going to be an interesting day at Zuccotti Park. Just two days after <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/metropolis/2011/10/10/bloomberg-occupy-wall-street-can-stay-indefinitely/">declaring</a> that the occupiers of Wall Street could stay in the park indefinitely, New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg announced last night that protesters will have to leave at least temporarily for a cleaning of the park on Friday. And there are hints that the company that owns the park wants the NYPD to evict the protesters permanently.</p><p>There is little chance that the protesters will comply with a temporary removal request -- and zero chance that they will willingly leave for good.</p><p>Bloomberg briefly visited the park last night, and his office later released a <a href="http://gothamist.com/2011/10/12/this_just_in_mayor_bloomberg_shows.php">statement</a> declaring, "As the protest has continued, Brookfield has expressed concern about its inability to clean the park and maintain it in a condition fit for public use. Brookfield conveyed these concerns in a letter they sent to the City."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/13/bloomberg_sets_up_confrontation_with_occupiers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/13/bloomberg_sets_up_confrontation_with_occupiers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bloomberg orders OWS to leave Zuccotti Park Friday</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/13/bloomberg_order_ows_to_leave_zuccotti_park_friday/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/13/bloomberg_order_ows_to_leave_zuccotti_park_friday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 13:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10110319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York mayor has ordered the park emptied for cleaning and maintenance, but the move may not be temporary]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg made an unexpected visit to Occupy Wall Street's base camp in Zuccotti Park last night to deliver a message: It's time to get out. Bloomberg told protesters that the Park had become unsanitary and potentially unsafe over the course of the four week occupation, and needed to undergo cleaning and maintenance immediately. As  such, police will assist the Park's landlord, Brookfield Office Properties, in removing all protesters by Friday morning. The news comes just two days after the mayor told protesters they could remain in the park <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/metropolis/2011/10/10/bloomberg-occupy-wall-street-can-stay-indefinitely/?mod=e2tw">"indefinitely,"</a> so long as they abided by the law.</p><p>Deputy Mayor for Operations Cas Holloway explained the decision in a <a href="http://www.docstoc.com/docs/99102132/Deputy-Mayor-Holloways-Statement-about-Mayor-Bloomberg-and-Zuccotti-Park">statement</a> last night:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/13/bloomberg_order_ows_to_leave_zuccotti_park_friday/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/13/bloomberg_order_ows_to_leave_zuccotti_park_friday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OWS doesn&#8217;t need Bloomberg&#8217;s permission</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/11/bloomberg_ows_protests/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/11/bloomberg_ows_protests/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 12:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10107518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The billionaire mayor will "allow" peaceful protesters to remain. What right did he have to remove them?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite fawning media coverage of a mayor from whom many elite reporters hope to get a <a href="http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/27/james-rubin-abruptly-departs-bloomberg/">$500,000-a-year job</a>, there remains a simple reason why <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/17/nyregion/in-poll-lowest-marks-for-bloomberg-in-6-years.html ">polls</a> show that a large number of rank-and-file New Yorkers haven't fallen for the propaganda: It's because he behaves like he believes he's a king.</p><p>This is a billionaire despot who <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/26/nyregion/26bermuda.html?pagewanted=all">weekends in Bermuda</a> and doesn't come home for municipal emergencies; deliberately lands himself recession-blind headlines describing him as <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/20/nyregion/a-glimpse-at-bloombergs-lavish-tastes-at-home.html">"baronial"</a>; makes sure public workers <a href="http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/2010/12/everyones_mad_a.php">plow</a> his street while the Big Apple's citizens <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/2010/12/29/2010-12-29_help_arrives_too_late_to_save_baby.html">die</a>; and now, most recently, declares that he has the extra-constitutional power to decide who is "allowed" in New York City and who is not. As the <a href="http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/10/10/bloomberg-says-protesters-can-stay-on-if-they-obey-laws/?smid=tw-nytmetro&amp;seid=auto">New York Times</a> reports (emphasis added):</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/11/bloomberg_ows_protests/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/11/bloomberg_ows_protests/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Politico holds contest to nominate best representative of Politico&#8217;s warped worldview for president</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/10/politico_awful_centirst_primary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/10/politico_awful_centirst_primary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 18:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit hawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim VandeHei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Labels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Third Parties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10106814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Beltway elite opinion organ chooses its dream third-party ticket of deficit hawks and centrists]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Politico has finally revealed itself to be a devilishly deadpan satire of idiotic Beltway thought <a href="http://www.politico.com/politicoprimary/">with its "POLITICO PRIMARY,"</a> an exercise in selecting a third-party "independent" candidate for president based on the only criteria that matter: fealty to the shibboleths of the political elite. I choose to believe it's a wicked parody, because the alternative -- that Politico's Internet contest to pick America's Next Top Centrist reflects the sincere beliefs of Politico's editors -- basically means that the Washington "grown-up" political class is completely divorced from reality, not just deaf to the concerns and needs of actual non-"Morning Joe"-watching Americans but wholly ignorant of the existence of a country outside their bubble.</p><p>Jim VandeHei and famous email newsletter author Mike Allen are spearheading the campaign (which has already been unfavorably reviewed <a href="http://www.cjr.org/campaign_desk/politico_primary_down_the_rabb.php?page=all">by CJR</a>). Here, they explain why America was crying out for Politico Primary:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/10/politico_awful_centirst_primary/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/10/politico_awful_centirst_primary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wild card in Wall Street endgame: Bloomberg&#8217;s girlfriend</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/06/wild_card_in_wall_street_endgame_bloombergs_girlfriend/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/06/wild_card_in_wall_street_endgame_bloombergs_girlfriend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 22:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10104852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The mayor's longtime partner sits on the board of the company that owns the park where occupiers are camped out]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mayor Michael Bloomberg's longtime girlfriend sits on the board of the company that owns the park where Occupy Wall Street protesters are camped out, and the NYPD is on the record saying that it's the company's call how long the protesters get to stay.</p><p>In other words, Bloomberg himself not only controls the NYPD, but also has a hand on the levers of power at Brookfield Properties, the huge real estate firm that owns Zuccoti Park (aka Liberty Square).</p><p>Bloomberg's girlfriend is Diana Taylor, a former state banking official who is now an executive at the investment firm Wolfensohn &amp; Co. She has for years been the unofficial first lady of New York. She is also on the <a href="http://www.brookfieldofficeproperties.com/content/corporate_governance/board_of_directors-16350.html?Page=2">board</a> of Brookfield.</p><p>The connection was first <a href="http://blog.littlesis.org/2011/10/05/the-public-private-partnership-behind-zuccotti-park/">reported</a> by the blog LittleSis.</p><p>I've asked the mayor's press office whether Bloomberg has discussed the protesters and the park with Taylor; I will update this post if I hear back.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/06/wild_card_in_wall_street_endgame_bloombergs_girlfriend/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/06/wild_card_in_wall_street_endgame_bloombergs_girlfriend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Questions fuel the growing Wall Street occupation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/06/questions_fuel_the_growing_wall_street_occupation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/06/questions_fuel_the_growing_wall_street_occupation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10104560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As labor embraces a leaderless movement, utopian goals draw bigger crowds and more cops]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I spent Wednesday at Occupy Wall Street, where thousands of union members joined the core protesters for what was easily the biggest march yet of the burgeoning movement. A crowd of as many as 15,000 people marched from Foley Square just north of City Hall to Liberty Square, the capital of Occupy Wall Street. It was diverse in age, race and aesthetic sensibility -- hardly a pack of hippies.</p><p>The mood during the afternoon march was elation and a sense that something is happening. Nurses, teamsters, service workers, teachers and bus drivers were all well represented. It remains difficult to impose a simple narrative on Occupy Wall Street, so here are a few thoughts and observations, in no particular order:</p><p><strong>The goals question:</strong> The union folks at the rally Wednesday were far more demand-oriented than the hardcore occupiers who have been sleeping in lower Manhattan since Sept. 17. The most common theme in the union signs and speechs at the rally outside City Hall was to simply tax the rich. One of the chants I heard was representative: "How do we cut the deficit? End the wars! Tax the rich!"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/06/questions_fuel_the_growing_wall_street_occupation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/06/questions_fuel_the_growing_wall_street_occupation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>67</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mayor Bloomberg, partner diagnose what&#039;s wrong with America: You</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/30/bloombergs_annoying/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/30/bloombergs_annoying/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Bailouts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New York's elite ask that regular folk please be more respectful of their betters (and stop protesting them)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.orionmagazine.org/index.php/articles/article/6470">90,000 New Yorkers who control 99% of the city's wealth</a> are completely segregated, geographically and intellectually, from everyone else in the city and the nation at large, so its no surprise that they tend to be tone-deaf and blind to the inequities and frustrations and resentments of Regular Folk, but billionaire Mayor Michael Bloomberg and his charming and powerful partner Diana Taylor are really out-doing themselves in terms of blinkered elite thickheadedness these days.</p><p>Let's start with Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who is at the moment clearly struggling with his natural impulse to throw every protester in jail without charges for the crime in interrupting the business of the city's truly important people. <a href="http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/2011/09/mayor_bloomberg_28.php">His impassioned plea</a> to the people currently participating in the Occupy Wall Street protest: The banks are our friends!</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/30/bloombergs_annoying/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/30/bloombergs_annoying/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The &#8220;Bloomberg View&#8221; is that Michael Bloomberg shouldn&#8217;t pay more taxes</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/20/bloomberg_view_taxes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/20/bloomberg_view_taxes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/09/20/bloomberg_view_taxes</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Billionaire media mogul's opinion arm opposes raising payments by billionaire media moguls]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg is also a billionaire media mogul. His financial information company recently unveiled an opinion section, promising only <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/12/21/bloomberg_opinions/index.html">"ideology-free, empirically-based editorial positions."</a> Bloomberg installed his ideology-free opinion-writers <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/01/13/bloomberg_conflict_of_interest">at the office of his foundation</a> where the mayor can have direct, personal involvement in their work. All of this adds up to a mess of potential conflicts of interest. Today, the "Bloomberg View" is that very rich people -- like Michael Bloomberg, say -- <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-09-19/-buffett-rule-is-wrong-way-to-spread-the-budget-burden-view.html">should not pay more taxes.</a></p><p>Of course, the unsigned editorial is very reasonable. It's a Bloomberg View editorial, and the Bloomberg brand is all post-partisan reasonableness. But the bottom line is that billionaire mayor and hypothetical third-party presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg opposes the Democratic president's plan to raise taxes on billionaires. Why? Out of greed or self-interest? No, of course not! <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-09-20/republicans-vow-revolution-blame-obama-for-uncertainty-view.html">Because it's "silly."</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/20/bloomberg_view_taxes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/20/bloomberg_view_taxes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The ridiculous third party rallying cry</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/27/third_party_circus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/27/third_party_circus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/david_sirota/2011/07/27/third_party_circus</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bloomberg and Friedman pretend partisan fighting is ruining our country. The real problem is too much consensus]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given that we're a little more than a year away from another election circus, it's no surprise that the now-traditional festivities of the modern electoral grotesquerie have begun in earnest. It always unfolds this way: Toward the middle of an odd-numbered year, you start feeling that rumble of the distant train creaking into town. Soon after, the familiar bustle returns: the professional polling prognosticators doing their best fortune teller impressions; the carnies in the political operative class busily setting up their tent-pole campaign headquarters; the drooling campaign reporters hollering at the boisterous pack of freakshow-caliber candidates; and the wing-tipped emcees in the White House beckoning passersby with bold-but-patently-absurd promises of great things yet to come (all for the price of a campaign contribution, of course).</p><p>Here we have the modern political bazaar, and it wouldn't be complete without the most reliably ridiculous troupe of all: the Third-Party Fetishists. Out of all the other sideshows, they are the ones most aggressively <a href="http://www.cjr.org/campaign_desk/tom_friedmans_radical_wrongnes.php">ramping up their 2012 act at the moment</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/27/third_party_circus/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/27/third_party_circus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If gay marriage fails in New York, Mayor Bloomberg&#8217;s money is partly to blame</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/24/bloomberg_gay_marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/24/bloomberg_gay_marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/06/24/bloomberg_gay_marriage</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The billionaire mayor supports equality with words, but he helped the GOP retake the state Senate]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg has forcefully urged the New York state Legislature to pass gay marriage. He's <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304520804576347762363512474.html">spoken on it in public</a> and lobbied for it in private. He clearly sees the equality fight as an important part of his legacy, and he's urged Albany politicians to do the same:</p><blockquote>
<p>In his speech, Mr. Bloomberg said state lawmakers have a clear choice: "Do you want to be remembered as a leader on civil rights? Or an obstructionist?"</p>
<p>"On matters of freedom and equality, history has not remembered obstructionists kindly," the mayor said. "Not on abolition. Not on abortion. Not on women's suffrage. Not on workers' rights. Not on civil rights. And it will be no different on marriage rights."</p>
</blockquote><p>Here's the situation in Albany right now: Marriage equality has passed the Democratic-led state Assembly, as it has multiple times in the past. It's stalled in the Senate, which, as always, is deadlocked. Tempers <a href="http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/06/24/frustration-rising-in-albany-with-no-vote-on-marriage/">are flaring.</a> Equality advocates now accuse Republicans of deliberately delaying in order to kill the issue without a vote.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/24/bloomberg_gay_marriage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/24/bloomberg_gay_marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Battle for Brooklyn&#8221;: In breaking news, Goliath beats David</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/17/battle_for_brooklyn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/17/battle_for_brooklyn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quick Takes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/andrew_ohehir/2011/06/17/battle_for_brooklyn</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Battle for Brooklyn" follows a bitter, racially tinged urban development fight -- but it's also a love story]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the movies, when David fights Goliath, we generally know who's going to win. In real life, of course, it tends to be the other way around, as the compact and fascinating documentary <a href="http://battleforbrooklyn.com">"Battle for Brooklyn"</a> demonstrates. Compressing a seven-year civic struggle over a massive redevelopment project in the center of Brooklyn, N.Y., into 93 minutes, Michael Galinsky and Suki Hawley's film spins a compelling tale about the value of individual and collective resistance, even as it makes clear where power in our society really resides. Along the way, "Battle for Brooklyn" tells the story of a love affair and a new family, and reminds us that even billionaires are not omnipotent.</p><p>No doubt "Battle for Brooklyn" will be of most interest to New Yorkers, and particularly to people who live or work in the city's most populous borough. But the film's basic situation -- local residents and community activists vs. the development schemes of major politicians and big business -- is an archetypal element of urban life, one that can be found in almost any city, large or small, from Maine to California. What distinguished kazillionaire developer Bruce Ratner's plan to remake the center of "America's fourth-largest city" (to borrow the boosterish phrase of Brooklyn Borough President Marty Markowitz) was primarily its size and audacity, along with the fact that the ensuing battle turned very ugly and inevitably attracted the attention of the national media, much of which is headquartered a few miles away across the East River.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/17/battle_for_brooklyn/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/17/battle_for_brooklyn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Alec Baldwin finally run for mayor of New York?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/08/alec_baldwin_interest_mayor_new_york/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/08/alec_baldwin_interest_mayor_new_york/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 21:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Weiner, D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/06/08/alec_baldwin_interest_mayor_new_york</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After decades of expressing interest in the Democratic ticket, has the star found a way in through Weinergate?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New York Mayor Alec Baldwin. Well, that certainly has an interesting ring to it. And according to some whisperings around town, there is a strong possibility that <a href="http://www.thedaily.com/page/2011/06/08/060811-news-alec-baldwin-1-2/">Baldwin has expressed some interest in running on the Democratic ticket</a>.</p><p>But is he actually considering running? So far, all we have in the way of evidence is a report from a friend that Alec thinks Weinergate may give him a chance to slip in among the candidates. The actual quote given from the source/friend of Alec's?</p><blockquote>
<p>"Alec said, 'Hey, maybe this changes the race. The dynamics have shifted."</p>
</blockquote><p>Which doesn't mean Baldwin is going to run for anything. He's just like, commenting on the political atmosphere, man. Who isn't right now? It's just pure speculation, until he actually comes out and says something to the press. And even then, it might not mean anything, since he mentions something about running for office <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/06/alec-baldwin-interested-in-congressional-run/">every six months or so</a>.</p><p>That being said:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/08/alec_baldwin_interest_mayor_new_york/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/08/alec_baldwin_interest_mayor_new_york/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

