<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Michael Bloomberg</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/michael_bloomberg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 15:24:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>NYPD&#8217;s Ray Kelly: Blacks &#8220;understopped&#8221; by police</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/ny_police_commissioner_blacks_understopped_by_police/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/ny_police_commissioner_blacks_understopped_by_police/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 15:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray Kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In line with Mayor Bloomberg, Ray Kelly defends the NYPD's racially skewed, controversial stop-and-frisk practices]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Echoing what Joan Walsh called Mayor Bloomberg's <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/mike_bloombergs_ugly_stop_and_frisk_freakout/">"ugly" defense </a>of the NYPD's stop-and-frisk practice, police commissioner Ray Kelly asserted Wednesday night that African Americans are "understopped" by police. During an <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/video/nypds-stop-frisk-racial-profiling-proactive-policing-19088868">interview with ABC</a>, the commissioner and the policing tactic's greatest defender, said that "African Americans are being understopped in relation to people being described as perpetrators of violent crime."</p><p>While Mayor Bloomberg has been mayor, the NYPD has carried out over<a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/nypd_make_5_millionth_stop_and_frisk_under_bloomberg/"> 5 million stop-and-frisks.</a> Analysis by the ACLU of official police data found that over 86 percent of the stops were of black or Latino individuals. The analysis of police data also revealed that 88 percent of the stops did not result in an arrest or summons (and of course an even smaller proportion ever lead to a prosecution, or conviction). The number of innocent people stopped alone serves as ample riposte to Kelly's suggestion that any demographic is "understopped."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/ny_police_commissioner_blacks_understopped_by_police/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/ny_police_commissioner_blacks_understopped_by_police/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mike Bloomberg&#8217;s ugly &#8220;stop and frisk&#8221; freakout</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/mike_bloombergs_ugly_stop_and_frisk_freakout/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/mike_bloombergs_ugly_stop_and_frisk_freakout/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 18:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raymond Kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13285860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He equates the NYCLU with the NRA, race-baits the New York Times and lets the NYPD profile blacks and Muslims]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/08/03/mayor_bloomberg_on_mosque/">One of New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s finest moments</a>, at least until his recent all-out advocacy for gun control, was when he choked up during a moving speech defending the development of the so-called Ground Zero Mosque in 2010. Remember that? Republicans were making it a big campaign issue, even President Obama took his time before kinda-sorta defending it, but Bloomberg made a big speech in front of the Statue of Liberty and defended the fundamental American right of New York Muslims to build a community center where they wanted it.</p><blockquote><p>This nation was founded on the principle that the government must never choose between religions or favor one over another. The World Trade Center site will forever hold a special place in our city, in our hearts. But we would be untrue to the best part of ourselves and who we are as New Yorkers and Americans if we said no to a mosque in lower Manhattan.</p> <p>Let us not forget that Muslims were among those murdered on 9/11, and that our Muslim neighbors grieved with us as New Yorkers and as Americans. We would betray our values and play into our enemies’ hands if we were to treat Muslims differently than anyone else. In fact, to cave to popular sentiment would be to hand a victory to the terrorists, and we should not stand for that.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/mike_bloombergs_ugly_stop_and_frisk_freakout/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/mike_bloombergs_ugly_stop_and_frisk_freakout/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>98</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Times Square was bombing suspects&#8217; next target</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/times_square_was_bombing_suspects_next_target_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/times_square_was_bombing_suspects_next_target_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 18:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[times square]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Marathon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Bombing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13282029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New York Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly says the Tsarnaevs had multiple explosives they intended to detonate]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NEW YORK (AP) — New York City officials say the Boston Marathon bombing suspects intended to blow up their remaining explosives in Times Square.</p><p>Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly spoke at a briefing Thursday.</p><p>Kelly says the two suspects had a pressure cooker bomb and five pipe bombs they wanted to set off.</p><p>They said Dzhokhar Tsarnaev (joh-KHAHR' tsahr-NEYE'-ehv) told Boston investigators from his hospital bed that he and his brother had discussed going to New York to detonate their remaining explosives. They said they decided it spontaneously.</p><p>Kelly had said a day earlier that the Boston Marathon bombing suspects were targeting New York, but was later briefed by federal officials.</p><p>Tsarnaev traveled to New York at least once last fall. There is a photo of the suspect in Times Square.</p><p>Tsarnaev's older brother, Tamerlan (TA'-mehr-luhn), died in a shootout with police.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/times_square_was_bombing_suspects_next_target_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/times_square_was_bombing_suspects_next_target_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bloomberg PAC may target Dem who voted against background checks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/bloomberg_pac_may_target_dem_who_voted_against_background_checks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/bloomberg_pac_may_target_dem_who_voted_against_background_checks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mayors against illegal guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[background checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Pryor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkansas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13280792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mayors Against Illegal Guns is reportedly considering running an ad campaign against Sen. Mark Pryor ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Bloomberg's super PAC, Mayors Against Illegal Guns, is reportedly considering running an ad campaign against Sen. Mark Pryor of Arkansas, who was one of four Democrats to vote against the Senate's measure to tighten gun background check laws.</p><p>The <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/politics/mark-pryor-may-soon-have-a-bloomberg-problem-20130423">National Journal</a> cites an anonymous senior official in the group, who said senior members of the super PAC met to discuss possible responses to the failure of gun control legislation:</p><blockquote><p>The Bloomberg group is mulling a variety of messages and methods for Arkansas. One approach would be to target reliable Democratic voters, including African Americans, with advertising that calls out Pryor for “opposing the president’s agenda,” the official said. Another would be to expand the campaign to suburban women and other moderates. The campaign might not be limited to the issue of guns.</p> <p>“Money would not be an object,” the official said, adding that a decision on whether to target Pryor would come soon and that action against other Democrats is still possible.</p></blockquote><p>Pryor is one of the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/mark_pryor_i_still_oppose_gay_marriage/">more vulnerable</a> Democrats up for reelection in 2014.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/bloomberg_pac_may_target_dem_who_voted_against_background_checks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/bloomberg_pac_may_target_dem_who_voted_against_background_checks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Occupy&#8217;s legacy: The media finally covers social protest fairly</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/occupys_legacy_the_media_finally_covers_social_protest_fairly/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/occupys_legacy_the_media_finally_covers_social_protest_fairly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2013 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13266952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Occupy's message about income inequality took hold because the media, for once, took a grassroots protest seriously]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>None of us was prepared for what happened next in Zuccotti Park. It was surprising enough that the police did not immediately evict the occupiers. We expected the most likely scenario was for hundreds of riot cops, backed up by horses and copters, to be unleashed against us that very night. This would certainly be in keeping with the style of the NYPD, whose usual strategy is to overwhelm protesters with sheer force of numbers. Yet in this case, someone made the decision to hold back.</p><p>One reason was the ambiguity of the legal situation: While public parks close by 12 p.m., Zuccotti Park was a public-private hybrid, owned by an investment firm, Brookfield Office Properties. Technically such “privately owned public properties” are accessible to the public twenty-four hours a day. Still, by our experience, the mere existence of such a law would have been of little relevance if the authorities decided they wanted to evict us anyway, but it allowed something of a fig leaf. But why did they even want a fig leaf?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/occupys_legacy_the_media_finally_covers_social_protest_fairly/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/occupys_legacy_the_media_finally_covers_social_protest_fairly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michelle Obama&#8217;s underrated role in gun debate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/michelle_obamas_underrated_role_in_gun_debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/michelle_obamas_underrated_role_in_gun_debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 20:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne LaPierre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Violence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13268120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a gun debate dominated by men, one person finally transcended it by speaking directly to black mothers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much has been made of the prominence of men like President Obama, Michael Bloomberg and Wayne LaPierre in the nation's current debate on gun safety reform. But less attention has been placed on the singular and transformational role of Michelle Obama.</p><p>The first lady elevated the conversation Wednesday, during a rare return to her hometown of Chicago. In a city ravaged by violence, with more than <a href="http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2013-01-01/news/ct-met-chicago-500th-homicide-20121229_1_homicide-rate-gang-violence-illegal-guns">500 gun-related homicides</a> last year alone, she spoke eloquently -- and apolitically -- transcending the partisan politics that seem to subvert her husband's efforts for reasonable gun control legislation.</p><p>But what was most unique was <em>for</em> whom, and <em>to</em> whom, Michelle spoke. Her words gave voice to an oft ignored (but disproportionately affected) victim of America's gun violence: the black mother.</p><p>The first lady spoke of Hadiya Pendleton, the slain 15-year-old student, gunned down just blocks from the Obama's Chicago home -- and only days after Pendleton had attended the president's second inauguration. With tears in her eyes, Michelle said, "Hadiya Pendleton was me and I was her." The first lady went on to add that Pendleton's family is "<a href="http://m.cnsnews.com/news/article/michelle-obama-hadiya-pendleton-was-me-and-i-was-her">just like</a>" her own.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/michelle_obamas_underrated_role_in_gun_debate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/michelle_obamas_underrated_role_in_gun_debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Would Weiner even be a good mayor?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/will_anthony_wiener_ride_again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/will_anthony_wiener_ride_again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Weiner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mayor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Scandal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13267350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's the key question overlooked amid the "Will he run?" chatter and sexting mea culpas]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Long before Anthony Weiner was an unfortunately named joke, he was a national TV presence, high-profile member of Congress and a leading candidate for mayor of New York City. For national progressive activists frustrated with their incrementalist in the White House, and fearing an ascendant and unhinged right, Weiner’s bombastic liberalism was a salve and a rallying point -- and he relished the role of movement leader.</p><p>But now that the former congressman is hinting at a comeback, with an <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/14/magazine/anthony-weiner-and-huma-abedins-post-scandal-playbook.html?pagewanted=all">emotional tell-all interview</a> in the New York Times Magazine and open talk that he's eyeing a run for mayor of New York City, can he recapture that glory on the left? And critically, was he even a good congressman to begin with? Good enough to run the nation's largest city?</p><p>Even among his Democratic compatriots, Weiner was always a bit of a divisive figure: a great communicator and powerful leader, but one who didn’t play well with others. “He operated as a lone ranger, giving a voice to the progressive movement, but not operating as a partner with a larger set of House members or progressives on the outside,” one senior strategist for an outside progressive group said, contrasting him with Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who works closely with partners to advance her agenda.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/will_anthony_wiener_ride_again/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/will_anthony_wiener_ride_again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christine Quinn tries to get Time Warner to pull attack ad</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/christine_quinn_tries_to_get_time_warner_to_pull_attack_ad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/christine_quinn_tries_to_get_time_warner_to_pull_attack_ad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 13:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Mayor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13265646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["You're not allowed to just put up false ads that have incorrect information," Quinn said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New York City Mayoral candidate Christine Quinn is trying to get Cablevision and Time Warner Cable to stop airing an ad that attacks Quinn's "political ambition" and ties to the one percent, saying that there is "incorrect information" in the ad.</p><p>The ad, which <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/christine_quinn_gets_attacked_from_the_left/">began airing</a> on Monday, was paid for by a group of left-leaning labor groups and other Democratic activists, which call themselves NYC Is Not for Sale 2013. The ad shows Quinn's picture amid a cloud of smoke, and says that “Virtually all of Christine Quinn’s decisions were made in rooms just like this, with her friends in the 1%.”</p><p><a href="http://www.ny1.com/content/top_stories/180047/ny1-exclusive--quinn-pressures-ny1-to-stop-airing-attack-ad-on-term-limits--living-wage-bill">NY1</a> reports:</p><blockquote><p>The ad also faults her for changing term limits, saying "She is always on the wrong side. On living wage."</p> <p>Quinn's lawyer says she passed the measure, so she can't be on the wrong side. However, she delayed the vote and passed a watered-down version.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/christine_quinn_tries_to_get_time_warner_to_pull_attack_ad/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/christine_quinn_tries_to_get_time_warner_to_pull_attack_ad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bloomberg gun group to grade lawmakers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/bloomberg_gun_group_to_grade_lawmakers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/bloomberg_gun_group_to_grade_lawmakers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 13:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13265649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mayors Against Illegal Guns will use the NRA's tactic of giving lawmakers letter grades on gun control]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Bloomberg's pro-gun control nonprofit, Mayors Against Illegal Guns, is borrowing the NRA's system of handing out letter-grades to lawmakers, except it will rank them on how strong they are on gun control.</p><p>“For decades, the NRA has done an admirable job of tracking to minute detail how members of Congress stand on gun bills. We’ve simply decided to do the same,” said the group's director, Mark Glaze.</p><p>The <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/michael-bloomberg-groups-gun-control-scorecard-will-give-lawmakers-letter-grades/2013/04/08/a1ab3c0c-a09f-11e2-82bc-511538ae90a4_story.html?hpid=z1">Washington Post</a> reports:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/bloomberg_gun_group_to_grade_lawmakers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/bloomberg_gun_group_to_grade_lawmakers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christine Quinn gets attacked from the left</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/christine_quinn_gets_attacked_from_the_left/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/christine_quinn_gets_attacked_from_the_left/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 16:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Mayor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13264732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new ad, put out by a coalition of labor unions and liberal activists, hits at Quinn's ties to the 1 percent]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A coalition of left-leaning groups has launched a new ad campaign against New York City mayoral candidate Christine Quinn, attacking her ties to the 1 percent and her "political ambition."</p><p>The 30-second ad is part of a $250,000 buy by labor groups and one animal rights group, and will run for three weeks. From the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/08/nyregion/outside-group-starts-spending-to-block-quinn.html?ref=nyregion&amp;_r=1&amp;">New York Times</a>:</p><blockquote><p>The coalition opposing Ms. Quinn is called NYC Is Not for Sale 2013 and appears to be a successor to a group that actively opposed Mr. Bloomberg’s 2009 re-election bid. It also includes an animal-rights group, NYClass, that has long fought with Ms. Quinn over horse-drawn carriages and other issues. But the coalition also includes Democrats who had previously been major donors to Ms. Quinn.</p></blockquote><p>The ad, which shows a picture of Quinn surrounded by smoke, says that “Virtually all of Christine Quinn’s decisions were made in rooms just like this, with her friends in the 1%. She wants you to think that she’s a progressive, but on the issues New Yorkers care most about, she is always on the wrong side."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/christine_quinn_gets_attacked_from_the_left/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/christine_quinn_gets_attacked_from_the_left/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to talk about a woman&#8217;s looks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/how_to_talk_about_a_womans_looks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/how_to_talk_about_a_womans_looks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kamala harris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual harrassment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorney General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Attorney General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13262203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president of the United States fails the test -- again]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There were, perhaps, stupider things <a href="https://twitter.com/DylanByers/status/319906842794942464">said</a> recently than “How did it become so difficult to call a woman good-looking in public?” but I didn't happen to hear them. So congratulations, Dylan Byers of Politico. Your commentary on the president calling California Attorney General Kamala Harris “by far, the best looking attorney general" made my brain hurt.</p><p>It is not "difficult to call a woman good-looking in public," not in a world where women's looks are considered public property, to be commented on, uninvited, whether it's on the street, in a job interview, or in the press. Many people find it quite easy to do, many of them men, and many people who should know better, like Barack Obama.</p><p>This is hardly the first time Obama has been smarmily sexist under the guise of paying a compliment. In the same New York magazine story on Christine Quinn in which Mayor Michael Bloomberg was notoriously quoted saying, "Look at the ass on her," Obama got a pass for a more politely phrased brand of creepiness. According to the piece, Obama <a href="http://nymag.com/news/features/christine-quinn-2013-2/">said</a> to a Republican legislator, 32-year-old Nicole Malliotakis, that she didn't look a day over 23. Quinn promptly joked that Malliotakis should become a Democrat, and the president chimed in, “Come on, honey! I said you’re pretty! I said you look 23!”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/how_to_talk_about_a_womans_looks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/how_to_talk_about_a_womans_looks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>237</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Allen West gets grossed out by male underwear models</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/allen_west_gets_grossed_out_by_male_underwear_models/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/allen_west_gets_grossed_out_by_male_underwear_models/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 15:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allen West]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13261504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["I was like ewww, you know?" he said of seeing a Calvin Klein model]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former Rep. Allen West is enjoying his new role as a talk show host who can say whatever he wants, which includes trashing everyone from Michael Bloomberg to Touré. "I finally get to be a regular guy," West says. "It's great."</p><p>Chris Moody from <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/allen-west-uncut-finally-regular-guy-093029108--politics.html">Yahoo! News</a> reports that West is hosting an online talk show for Pajamas Media, and in recent episodes has called NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg a "gnome," MSNBC Host Touré a "coward," and made fun of Fox News' Brit Hume for wearing a pink shirt. From Yahoo:</p><blockquote><p>"Not a fan of salmon?" [co-host John] Phillips asked him after a brief rant about Hume’s clothing.</p> <p>"<em>Eating</em> salmon," West replied. "Not watching, you know, a guy <em>dressed</em> in salmon."</p></blockquote><p>West also described his reaction to seeing a Calvin Klein ad with a male model wearing only underwear. "I was like ewww, you know?" he said.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/allen_west_gets_grossed_out_by_male_underwear_models/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/allen_west_gets_grossed_out_by_male_underwear_models/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Suddenly, NYPD doesn&#8217;t love surveillance anymore</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/big_brother_is_a_big_hypocrite/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/big_brother_is_a_big_hypocrite/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray Kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inspector general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13258140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Law enforcement agencies monitor our most basic acts. But try assigning them a watchdog and they resist with fury]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Big Brother theory of surveillance goes something like this: pervasive snooping and monitoring shouldn't frighten innocent people, it should only make lawbreakers nervous because they are the only ones with something to hide. Those who subscribe to this theory additionally argue that the widespread awareness of such surveillance creates a permanent preemptive deterrent to such lawbreaking ever happening in the first place.</p><p>I don't personally agree that this logic is a convincing justification for the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/12/what_does_a_police_state_look_like/">American Police State</a>, and when I hear such arguments, I inevitably find myself confused by the contradiction of police-state proponents proposing to curtail freedom in order to protect it. But whether or not you subscribe to the police-state tautology, you have to admit there is more than a bit of hypocrisy at work when those who forward the Big Brother logic simultaneously insist such logic shouldn't apply to them or the governmental agencies they oversee.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/big_brother_is_a_big_hypocrite/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/big_brother_is_a_big_hypocrite/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Forget Bloomberg&#8217;s nanny state</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/forget_bloombergs_nanny_state/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/forget_bloombergs_nanny_state/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Police Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray Kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police commissioner ray kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13253675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's his approach to public safety that's the bigger danger to our freedoms]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have seen it with my own eyes, and heard the stories of cousins, brothers and friends. Innocent of crime, guilty of no infraction, they are harassed, placed against walls, handcuffed, sometimes released, sometimes incited -- but never respected. For many African-American citizens of New York City, there is an axiomatic truth that the New York Police Department neither <em>serves</em> nor <em>protects</em> them.</p><p>This month, NYPD's controversial stop-and-frisk policy -- which entails officers regularly stopping predominantly black and Latino men and frisking them for weapons and drugs -- went on trial in federal Court. The class-action lawsuit, Floyd v. City of New York, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/23/opinion/walking-while-black-in-new-york.html">challenges the NYPD policy</a> on the basis that it violates the Constitution's Equal Protection Clause, and the Fourth Amendment's prohibition against unreasonable search and seizure. According to the Center for Constitutional Rights, the NYPD's own data show hundreds of thousands of unconstitutional stops in the past three years alone, and expert <a href="http://dailykos.com/story/2013/03/24/1196149/-Stop-and-frisk-on-trial">analysis of their data</a> -- controlling for crime, neighborhood and patterns of police deployment -- has found that the mitigating factor in NYPD stops is race.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/forget_bloombergs_nanny_state/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/forget_bloombergs_nanny_state/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fracking: The next bubble?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/fracking_the_next_bubble_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/fracking_the_next_bubble_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 15:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13257774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research shows that our reliance on cheap, domestic natural gas may not be sustainable]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" /></a> This article was published in partnership with <a href="http://globalpossibilities.org/">GlobalPossibilities.org</a>.</p><p>Coal and nuclear power industries in the United States have seen better days. The main culprit, energy industry analysts say, is the low cost of domestic natural gas, coupled with carbon-reducing regulations imposed by the Environmental Protection Agency and the efforts of environmental groups.</p><p>Instead of paying the high costs to <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052748703579804575441683910246338.html">upgrade</a> coal-fired plants and <a href="http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/geoffreylean/100206841/is-shale-gas-killing-nuclear-power/">repair</a> aged nuclear facilities to meet environmental regulations, power companies across the country have been making the switch to natural gas.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/fracking_the_next_bubble_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/fracking_the_next_bubble_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama: &#8220;Shame on us&#8221; if we forget Newtown</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/28/obama_shame_on_us_if_forget_newtown_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/28/obama_shame_on_us_if_forget_newtown_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 17:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13254811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president urged lawmakers Thursday not to "get squishy" in the face of gun rights advocates]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama urged lawmakers Thursday to remember the children gunned down in America and not "get squishy" in the face of powerful forces against gun control legislation, as supporters struggle to win over moderate Democrats before a Senate vote expected next month.</p><p>Obama, flanked by grim-faced mothers who have lost their children to guns, said Washington must do something after the tragic mass shooting in Newtown, Conn., three months ago. He called out to the families of four children killed at Sandy Hook Elementary School sitting in his audience.</p><p>"Shame on us if we've forgotten," Obama said. "I haven't forgotten those kids."</p><p>Obama's event comes as gun control legislation faces an uncertain future, even though more than 80 percent of people say in polling they support expanded background checks. Backed by a $12 million TV advertising campaign financed by New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, gun control groups scheduled rallies around the country Thursday aimed at pressuring senators to back the effort.</p><p>Obama said the upcoming vote is the best chance in more than a decade to reduce gun violence. He encouraged Americans, especially gun owners, to press lawmakers home from a congressional spring break to "turn that heartbreak into something real."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/28/obama_shame_on_us_if_forget_newtown_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/28/obama_shame_on_us_if_forget_newtown_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>David Gregory irate about soda, meh on civil rights</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/does_tv_news_care_more_about_soda_than_civil_rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/does_tv_news_care_more_about_soda_than_civil_rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 13:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jake Tapper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meet the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Letterman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Late Show With David Letterman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13250760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In national interviews, Mayor Bloomberg gets grilled about beverage sizes. His stop-and-frisk policy? Not so much]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In New York City, Mayor Michael Bloomberg's NYPD is stopping large numbers of innocent people walking down the street each day -- questioning them as to their whereabouts and invasively frisking their bodies in a hunt for weapons and drugs. The stops are almost entirely (<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/23/nyregion/fighting-stop-and-frisk-tactic-but-hitting-racial-divide.html?_r=0">nearly nine in 10</a>) targeting young black and Latino men. The overwhelming majority of those stopped are doing nothing wrong (just <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/09/opinion/stop-and-frisk-in-new-york-city.html">6 percent of stops lead to arrests</a>, and a small fraction of those <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/26/nyregion/in-the-bronx-resistance-to-prosecuting-stop-and-frisk-arrests.html?pagewanted=all">are ever prosecuted</a>). And it's having a deleterious effect on the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/video/2012/06/12/opinion/100000001601732/the-scars-of-stop-and-frisk.html">psyche of the targets</a> (as well as <a href="http://colorlines.com/archives/2013/03/heres_why_new_york_citys_stop-and-frisk_trial_is_really_important.html">community relations with police)</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/does_tv_news_care_more_about_soda_than_civil_rights/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/does_tv_news_care_more_about_soda_than_civil_rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Sunday Shows take on guns and gays</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/the_sunday_shows_take_on_guns_and_gays/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/the_sunday_shows_take_on_guns_and_gays/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2013 20:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Sunday Shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Brooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david gregory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meet the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[face the nation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13250580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today. more Iraq War salesmen hype the Iran threat and David Gregory stands up for the right to drink soda]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One interesting thing I've noted since I started watching the mostly wretched Sunday shows is that for the most part there is not much debate, between the liberal and conservative panel mainstays, on gay marriage. Everyone is in favor of it or not inclined to strongly oppose it. So in order to have a proper right-vs-left Sunday Show Debate on the matter, two of the shows today were forced to bring in outspoken bigots. National embarrassments Tony Perkins and Ralph Reed both gamely answered the call, and defended "traditional marriage" from the inevitable march of widespread acceptance of gays and lesbians.</p><p>First, though, ABC's "This Week," the only one of the big three shows this morning to have another idiotic debate about budgets, began with George Stephanopoulos actually bragging -- bragging! -- that he had both Jim Messina <em>and</em> Karl Rove. Oh boy, two campaign strategists! When I am looking for well-considered and thoughtful commentary on national issues, I always turn to people who are good at managing political campaigns.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/the_sunday_shows_take_on_guns_and_gays/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/the_sunday_shows_take_on_guns_and_gays/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sunday Show round-up: Bloomberg vs. LaPierre</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/sunday_show_round_up_bloomberg_vs_lapierre/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/sunday_show_round_up_bloomberg_vs_lapierre/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2013 16:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DoMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunday shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne LaPierre]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13250429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bloomberg says "insane" things about guns, argued Wayne LaPierre; and more from the Sunday shows]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week's Sunday shows put New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Wayne LaPierre, the CEO of the National Rife Association, on opposite sides of the gun control debate. Here are the highlights:</p><p>On gun control:</p><p>Michael Bloomberg, who <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/bloomberg_bankrolls_national_ad_blitz_on_gun_control/">launched</a> a $12 million ad blitz to push for gun control, promised that Congress would have a vote on an assault weapons ban. “We've been fighting since 2007 to get a vote. We are going to have a vote for sure on assault weapons and we're going to have a vote on background checks,” he said on "Meet the Press." Bloomberg added: “If we were to get background checks only, it wouldn't be as good as if we got both, but look, we demanded a plan and then we demanded a vote. We've got the plan, we're going to get the vote."</p><p>Wayne LaPierre later slammed Bloomberg's effort. "He can't spend enough of of his $27 billion to try to impose his will on the American public," LaPierre said on "Meet the Press." He added that Bloomberg is "so reckless in terms of his comments on this whole gun issue."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/sunday_show_round_up_bloomberg_vs_lapierre/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/sunday_show_round_up_bloomberg_vs_lapierre/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bloomberg bankrolls national ad blitz on gun control</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/bloomberg_bankrolls_national_ad_blitz_on_gun_control/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/bloomberg_bankrolls_national_ad_blitz_on_gun_control/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal background checks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13250394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A $12 million campaign will target lawmakers who might be convinced to support gun control legislation]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg is funding a $12 million national ad blitz to target members of Congress who could potentially support Congress' gun control package. The ads will run in 13 states during the Easter recess, shortly before Congress takes up the legislation in April.</p><p>The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/24/nyregion/bloombergs-tv-blitz-on-guns-puts-swing-state-senators-on-the-spot.html?hp&amp;_r=2&amp;">New York Times</a> reports:</p><blockquote><p>In a telling sign of how much the white-hot demands for gun control have been tempered by political reality, Mr. Bloomberg’s commercials make no mention of an assault weapons ban once sought by the White House and its allies, instead focusing on the more achievable goal of universal background checks.</p></blockquote><p>“You don’t want to lose everything in the interest of getting the perfect,” Bloomberg told the Times. He added: “The N.R.A. has just had this field to itself," but "It’s time for another voice.”</p><p>Some of the senators targeted  by the ads are Democrats slated for tough reelection battles in 2014, like Kay Hagan N.C., Mary Landrieu, La., and Mark Pryor, Ark, or Republicans in swing states, like Pat Toomey, Pa., and Rob Portman, Wis.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/bloomberg_bankrolls_national_ad_blitz_on_gun_control/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/bloomberg_bankrolls_national_ad_blitz_on_gun_control/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>