<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Michael Bloomberg</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/michael_bloomberg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How do you like my money now, liberals?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/mayor_bloomberg_decides_to_spend_some_money_to_save_stop_and_frisk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/mayor_bloomberg_decides_to_spend_some_money_to_save_stop_and_frisk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 12:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political campaigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13347109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mayor Bloomberg now plans to spend big bucks to defeat lawmakers trying to rein in stop-and-frisk and the NYPD]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is one important thing you have to remember about Michael Bloomberg: He is an asshole. It is easy to forget this if you don't live in New York, or if you live in New York and you are a well-off white person who is never harassed by his NYPD, but it is a fact. Thus far, the billionaire mayor has been using his fortune for nice things that everyone likes, like funding ads in support of gay marriage and <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/02/nyregion/bloombergs-push-for-tighter-gun-laws-shifts-to-other-states.html?pagewanted=all&amp;_r=0">gun control.</a> But he has enough money to also spend some on capricious meddling in areas Good Liberals are less likely to approve of. According to the New York Post (and admittedly it is often wrong about all sorts of things but you can generally trust its City Hall reporting), Mayor Bloomberg is <a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/mike_eye_one_pol_to_salvage_stop_WW0pFVWWNAsY9Vy2v0KWvK">now planning to spend some money</a> to defeat City Council opponents of stop-and-frisk. Or, if not defeat them, at least scare them into changing their minds.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/mayor_bloomberg_decides_to_spend_some_money_to_save_stop_and_frisk/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/mayor_bloomberg_decides_to_spend_some_money_to_save_stop_and_frisk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>53</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bloomberg on stop-and-frisk: &#8220;Nobody racially profiles&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/bloomberg_on_stop_and_frisk_nobody_racially_profiles/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/bloomberg_on_stop_and_frisk_nobody_racially_profiles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racial profiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raymond Kelly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13340062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He also argued that, if anything, the NYPD "disproportionately" stops "minorities too little"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg contends that racial profiling is not a problem in the NYPD's stop-and-frisk program, and, if anything, "we disproportionately stop whites too much and minorities too little."</p><p>Bloomberg appeared on John Gambling's WOR-NY radio show, <a href="http://www.capitalnewyork.com/article/politics/2013/06/8531366/nobody-racially-profiles-bloomberg-councils-two-bad-nypd-bills">Capital New York</a> reports, to discuss two bills <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/new_york_city_council_passes_two_nypd_oversight_bills/">passed</a> by the New York City Council -- one that would create an inspector general to oversee the NYPD, and another to allow people to sue over racial profiling by the police. "The racial profiling bill is just so unworkable," Bloomberg said. "Nobody racially profiles."</p><p>From Capital New York:</p><blockquote><p>The mayor went on to cite the city's murder rate, which has fallen dramatically during his tenure, and argue that now is not the time to conduct a "social experiment."</p> <p>"There is this business, there's one newspaper and one news service, they just keep saying, 'Oh it's a disproportionate percentage of a particular ethnic group,'" he went on. "That may be, but it's not a disproportionate percentage of those who witnesses and victims describe as committing the murder. In that case, incidentally, I think we disproportionately stop whites too much and minorities too little."</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/bloomberg_on_stop_and_frisk_nobody_racially_profiles/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/bloomberg_on_stop_and_frisk_nobody_racially_profiles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York City Council passes two NYPD oversight bills</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/new_york_city_council_passes_two_nypd_oversight_bills/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/new_york_city_council_passes_two_nypd_oversight_bills/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 13:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raymond Kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13338662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amid opposition from Mayor Bloomberg, the Council approved bills to curb the use of stop-and-frisk by the NYPD]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New York City Council approved two bills to establish more oversight of the NYPD's use of stop-and-frisk, amid opposition from Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Police Chief Raymond Kelly.</p><p>The <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dailypolitics/2013/06/city-council-passes-inspector-general-and-racial-profiling-bills-with-veto-pro">New York Daily News</a> reports:</p><blockquote><p>The Council voted with veto-proof majorities for bills creating an inspector general's office to oversee the NYPD and allowing people to sue over racial profiling by police.</p> <p>The IG bill passed 40-11. The profiling bill passed 34-17 -- exactly the number of votes needed to withstand Bloomberg’s expected veto.</p></blockquote><p>Bloomberg's counsel Michael Best objected to the bills in a letter to the Council, arguing that they “would seriously impede the ability of the Police Department and the City to protect 8.4 million New Yorkers” and cause an “avalanche of new lawsuits against police action.”</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/new_york_city_council_passes_two_nypd_oversight_bills/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/new_york_city_council_passes_two_nypd_oversight_bills/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bloomberg&#8217;s Siri joke slights female engineers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/bloombergs_siri_comment_slights_female_engineers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/bloombergs_siri_comment_slights_female_engineers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 18:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Siri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13328906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[His comment that Stanford grads should come to New York to date girls leaves a lot of women out]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Bloomberg has gotten a lot of <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2013/06/16/bloomberg-stanford-graduation/">attention</a> for his commencement speech Sunday at Stanford University, in which he urged grads to come to New York to pursue tech careers. In New York, he told the crowd, "There’s more to do on a Friday night than go to the Pizza Hut in Sunnyvale. And you may even be able to find a date with a girl whose name is not Siri."</p><p>For Stanford's straight male engineering grads, the latter might be attractive. But for those female engineering majors who date men, the availability of hot non-Siri girls in New York may not be much of a draw.</p><p>Women made up 30 percent of the undergraduate class at <a href="http://engineering.stanford.edu/about/facts">Stanford's engineering school</a> in 2010-11. That's not an insignificant number -- certainly enough that any commencement speaker should presume some female audience (leaving aside for the moment the share of male grads who might prefer to date dudes). Stanford has also turned out a number of high-profile female engineers, from Marissa Mayer to <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/07/jobs/hearsay-socials-chief-on-thinking-big-at-a-young-age.html">Clara Shih;</a> anyone who thinks the face of Stanford engineering (or engineering, period) is uniformly male isn't paying attention.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/bloombergs_siri_comment_slights_female_engineers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/bloombergs_siri_comment_slights_female_engineers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bloomberg asks donors to cut off Dems who opposed background checks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/bloomberg_asks_donors_to_cut_off_dems_who_opposed_background_checks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/bloomberg_asks_donors_to_cut_off_dems_who_opposed_background_checks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 13:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[background checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Begich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heidi Heitkamp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Max Baucus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Pryor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13324047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Mayor is pushing New York Democratic donors to punish the Senators who voted against the measure]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg is pushing Democratic donors in New York City to cut off donations to the four Democrats who voted against background checks when the measure came up in the Senate.</p><p>The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/12/nyregion/bloomberg-urges-no-gifts-to-democrats-who-blocked-gun-bill.html">New York Times</a> reports that Bloomberg is planning to send a letter on Wednesday to top donors, urging them against supporting the four senators - Mark Pryor, of Arkansas, Max Baucus of Montana, Mark Begich of Alaska and Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota - who have collectively raised over $2.2 million from New York.</p><p>From the Times:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/bloomberg_asks_donors_to_cut_off_dems_who_opposed_background_checks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/bloomberg_asks_donors_to_cut_off_dems_who_opposed_background_checks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York City pitches $20 billion plan to prep for climate change</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/new_york_city_pitches_20_billion_plan_to_prep_for_climate_change/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/new_york_city_pitches_20_billion_plan_to_prep_for_climate_change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 20:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricane Sandy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13323158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The plan would include flood walls, among other things]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A proposal in New York City would set aside $20 billion to prepare the city for the effects of climate change, including building floodwalls and other storm barriers to protect the city.</p><p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/06/11/us-climate-newyork-plan-idUSBRE95A10120130611?feedType=RSS&amp;feedName=domesticNews">Reuters</a> reports:</p><blockquote><p>The sweeping plan includes 250 recommendations, ranging from installing floodwalls and storm barriers to <a href="http://www.reuters.com/finance/markets/upgrades?lc=int_mb_1001">upgrades</a> of power and telecommunications infrastructures.</p> <p>With the Big <a href="http://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/overview?symbol=AAPL&amp;lc=int_mb_1001">Apple</a> facing significant impacts from climate change in the decades to come -- including becoming as hot as Birmingham, Alabama, by 2050 -- the plan aims to make sure that New York City's extensive subway, transit, sewer and water, energy and <a href="http://www.reuters.com/sectors/industries/overview?industryCode=124&amp;lc=int_mb_1001">food distribution</a> systems will still be able to serve the more than 8 million people who live there.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/new_york_city_pitches_20_billion_plan_to_prep_for_climate_change/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/new_york_city_pitches_20_billion_plan_to_prep_for_climate_change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New data shows school &#8220;reformers&#8221; are full of it</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/03/instead_of_a_war_on_teachers_how_about_one_on_poverty/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/03/instead_of_a_war_on_teachers_how_about_one_on_poverty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle Rhee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teachers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poverty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teachers Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rahm Emanuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charter schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic inequality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13315871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Poor schools underperform largely because of economic forces, not because teachers have it too easy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the great American debate over education, the education and technology corporations, bankrolled politicians and activist-profiteers who collectively comprise the so-called "reform" movement base their arguments on one central premise: that America should expect public schools to produce world-class academic achievement regardless of the negative forces bearing down on a school's particular students. In recent days, though, the faults in that premise are being exposed by unavoidable reality.</p><p>Before getting to the big news, let's review the dominant fairy tale: As embodied by New York City's major education <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/02/nyregion/new-evaluation-system-for-new-york-teachers.html?_r=0">announcement</a> this weekend, the "reform" fantasy pretends that a lack of teacher "accountability" is the major education problem and somehow wholly writes family economics out of the story (amazingly, this fantasy persists even in a place like the Big Apple where economic inequality is <a href="http://strongforall.org/new-yorks-worst-in-the-nation-income-inequality-getting-even-worse/">particularly crushing</a>). That key -- and deliberate -- omission serves myriad political interests.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/03/instead_of_a_war_on_teachers_how_about_one_on_poverty/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/03/instead_of_a_war_on_teachers_how_about_one_on_poverty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>301</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>After defeat in Congress, Bloomberg brings gun control fight to the states</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/02/after_defeat_in_congress_bloomberg_brings_gun_control_fight_to_the_states/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/02/after_defeat_in_congress_bloomberg_brings_gun_control_fight_to_the_states/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jun 2013 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13315250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bloomberg's group, Mayors Against Illegal Guns, has shifted strategy to local politicians and piecemeal reform ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Undeterred by Congress' defeat of gun control in April, Michael Bloomberg has taken his campaign for stricter gun regulations to state capitals across the country. Bloomberg's reform group, Mayors Against Illegal Guns, has dispatched its advocates to canvas the country in a grassroots effort to build mainstream support for reform and pressure local politicians to act.</p><p>One tip the group's representatives are given as they meet with state representatives from Oregon to Nevada: maybe don't mention Bloomberg's name once you're there, as the New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/02/nyregion/bloombergs-push-for-tighter-gun-laws-shifts-to-other-states.html?pagewanted=2&amp;ref=todayspaper&amp;_r=0" target="_blank">reports</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/02/after_defeat_in_congress_bloomberg_brings_gun_control_fight_to_the_states/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/02/after_defeat_in_congress_bloomberg_brings_gun_control_fight_to_the_states/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Anyone who comes for my guns will be shot in the face&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/anyone_who_comes_for_my_guns_will_be_shot_in_the_face_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/anyone_who_comes_for_my_guns_will_be_shot_in_the_face_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 11:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ricin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13313709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ricin-laced letters sent to Obama and Bloomberg also contained a menacing threat]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — A suspicious letter mailed to the White House and intercepted this week was similar to two threatening, poison-laced letters on the gun law debate sent to New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, one of the nation's most potent gun-control advocates, officials said Thursday.</p><p>Yet another letter became known publicly on Thursday, one tainted with the poison ricin and mailed to President Barack Obama from Spokane, Wash., the FBI said. Authorities have arrested a man in Spokane in connection with that letter, which was intercepted May 22.</p><p>The Secret Service said the White House-bound letter similar to the ones Bloomberg was sent was intercepted by a White House mail screening facility. Two similar letters postmarked in Louisiana and sent to Bloomberg in New York and his gun control group in Washington contained traces of the deadly poison ricin.</p><p>It wasn't immediately clear whether the letter sent to Obama contained ricin. It was turned over to the FBI's Joint Terrorism Task Force for testing and investigation.</p><p>The two Bloomberg letters, opened Friday in New York and Sunday in Washington, contained an oily pinkish-orange substance.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/anyone_who_comes_for_my_guns_will_be_shot_in_the_face_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/anyone_who_comes_for_my_guns_will_be_shot_in_the_face_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Has school disciplining gone too far?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/has_school_disciplining_gone_too_far_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/has_school_disciplining_gone_too_far_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 14:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Civil Liberties Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13300399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In institutions across the U.S., normal children's behavior is being treated as evidence of a psychiatric disorder]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" /></a> Brianna Pena, a 5-year-old, was told she could not return to her kindergarten classroom at her Bronx, NY, charter school until she was “psychiatrically cleared” to return by a medical professional.  It was her first day at a new school.  She didn’t know anyone and repeatedly cried, “Nobody cares about me!” School officials insist that Brianna kept “yelling and throwing chairs” during the incident.  Administrators placed her on a list of so-called <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/charter-schools-boot-2-troubled-kindergartners-article-1.1070199" target="_blank">“psychiatric suspensions.”</a></p><p>In Bartow, FL, Kiera Wilmot, a 16-year-old student was expelled from Bartow High School and arrested for conducting an unapproved chemistry experiment.  She combined some household chemicals in an 8-ounce water bottle and the top popped off, giving off a small explosion.  According to the school principal, Ron Pritchard, "she made a bad choice. ... She wanted to see what would happen [when the chemicals mixed] and was shocked by what it did.”  She was charged with possession of and discharging a weapon on <a href="http://reason.com/blog/2013/05/01/zero-tolerance-watch-teen-faces-felony-c" target="_blank">school property.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/has_school_disciplining_gone_too_far_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/has_school_disciplining_gone_too_far_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York City Council considers letting non-citizens vote</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/new_york_city_council_considers_letting_non_citizens_vote/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/new_york_city_council_considers_letting_non_citizens_vote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 13:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigrants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City Council]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13293656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Council is scheduled to hold a hearing on allowing non-citizen residents to vote in municipal elections]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New York City Council will hold a hearing on Thursday to again consider allowing non-citizen residents to vote in municipal elections, a measure that appears to have a veto-proof majority in the Council, after a similar measure failed to pass in 2004.</p><p>The <a href="http://legistar.council.nyc.gov/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=803591&amp;GUID=3652CB45-9436-4D4F-ADE3-E17CE8A8AF28&amp;Options=ID%7cText%7c&amp;Search=245">proposal</a> would extend voting rights to "not a United States citizen, but is lawfully present in the United States" and "has been a resident of New York City, as defined herein, for six months or longer by the date of such election." This would include local elections, including for mayor, the comptroller, the public advocate, members of the city council, and the borough presidents.</p><p>The <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/citizenship-now/immigration-city-council-discuss-allowing-non-citizen-voting-article-1.1337555#commentpostform">New York Daily News</a> reports:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/new_york_city_council_considers_letting_non_citizens_vote/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/new_york_city_council_considers_letting_non_citizens_vote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stop-and-frisk numbers are down&#8230; And so is crime</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/stop_and_frisk_numbers_down_and_so_is_crime/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/stop_and_frisk_numbers_down_and_so_is_crime/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 13:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray Kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13291597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New figures challenge claims by Bloomberg and NYPD chief that the tactic is a necessary crime-stopper]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the NYPD's stop-and-frisk tactic continues <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/momentum_surges_for_police_reform/">to be challenged</a> in a landmark federal court case, new statistics suggest that the controversial and racially skewed practice may not even serve to lower crime rates. According to new figures released by the NYPD, flagged by the<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323372504578467361507997492.html?mod=WSJ_LatestHeadlines"> Wall Street Journal</a>, the number of stop-and-frisk reports filed by New York City police fell by just over 50 percent in the first three months of this year compared with the same period last year. Meanwhile, WSJ notes "overall crime is also down 2.7 percent this year through April 28 with murders leading the way with a 30% decline compared with the same period last year, police data show."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/stop_and_frisk_numbers_down_and_so_is_crime/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/stop_and_frisk_numbers_down_and_so_is_crime/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NYPD&#8217;s Ray Kelly: Blacks &#8220;understopped&#8221; by police</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/ny_police_commissioner_blacks_understopped_by_police/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/ny_police_commissioner_blacks_understopped_by_police/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 15:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray Kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In line with Mayor Bloomberg, Ray Kelly defends the NYPD's racially skewed, controversial stop-and-frisk practices]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Echoing what Joan Walsh called Mayor Bloomberg's <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/mike_bloombergs_ugly_stop_and_frisk_freakout/">"ugly" defense </a>of the NYPD's stop-and-frisk practice, police commissioner Ray Kelly asserted Wednesday night that African Americans are "understopped" by police. During an <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/video/nypds-stop-frisk-racial-profiling-proactive-policing-19088868">interview with ABC</a>, the commissioner and the policing tactic's greatest defender, said that "African Americans are being understopped in relation to people being described as perpetrators of violent crime."</p><p>While Mayor Bloomberg has been mayor, the NYPD has carried out over<a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/nypd_make_5_millionth_stop_and_frisk_under_bloomberg/"> 5 million stop-and-frisks.</a> Analysis by the ACLU of official police data found that over 86 percent of the stops were of black or Latino individuals. The analysis of police data also revealed that 88 percent of the stops did not result in an arrest or summons (and of course an even smaller proportion ever lead to a prosecution, or conviction). The number of innocent people stopped alone serves as ample riposte to Kelly's suggestion that any demographic is "understopped."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/ny_police_commissioner_blacks_understopped_by_police/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/ny_police_commissioner_blacks_understopped_by_police/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mike Bloomberg&#8217;s ugly &#8220;stop and frisk&#8221; freakout</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/mike_bloombergs_ugly_stop_and_frisk_freakout/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/mike_bloombergs_ugly_stop_and_frisk_freakout/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 18:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raymond Kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13285860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He equates the NYCLU with the NRA, race-baits the New York Times and lets the NYPD profile blacks and Muslims]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/08/03/mayor_bloomberg_on_mosque/">One of New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s finest moments</a>, at least until his recent all-out advocacy for gun control, was when he choked up during a moving speech defending the development of the so-called Ground Zero Mosque in 2010. Remember that? Republicans were making it a big campaign issue, even President Obama took his time before kinda-sorta defending it, but Bloomberg made a big speech in front of the Statue of Liberty and defended the fundamental American right of New York Muslims to build a community center where they wanted it.</p><blockquote><p>This nation was founded on the principle that the government must never choose between religions or favor one over another. The World Trade Center site will forever hold a special place in our city, in our hearts. But we would be untrue to the best part of ourselves and who we are as New Yorkers and Americans if we said no to a mosque in lower Manhattan.</p> <p>Let us not forget that Muslims were among those murdered on 9/11, and that our Muslim neighbors grieved with us as New Yorkers and as Americans. We would betray our values and play into our enemies’ hands if we were to treat Muslims differently than anyone else. In fact, to cave to popular sentiment would be to hand a victory to the terrorists, and we should not stand for that.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/mike_bloombergs_ugly_stop_and_frisk_freakout/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/mike_bloombergs_ugly_stop_and_frisk_freakout/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>98</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Times Square was bombing suspects&#8217; next target</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/times_square_was_bombing_suspects_next_target_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/times_square_was_bombing_suspects_next_target_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 18:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[times square]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Marathon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Bombing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13282029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New York Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly says the Tsarnaevs had multiple explosives they intended to detonate]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NEW YORK (AP) — New York City officials say the Boston Marathon bombing suspects intended to blow up their remaining explosives in Times Square.</p><p>Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly spoke at a briefing Thursday.</p><p>Kelly says the two suspects had a pressure cooker bomb and five pipe bombs they wanted to set off.</p><p>They said Dzhokhar Tsarnaev (joh-KHAHR' tsahr-NEYE'-ehv) told Boston investigators from his hospital bed that he and his brother had discussed going to New York to detonate their remaining explosives. They said they decided it spontaneously.</p><p>Kelly had said a day earlier that the Boston Marathon bombing suspects were targeting New York, but was later briefed by federal officials.</p><p>Tsarnaev traveled to New York at least once last fall. There is a photo of the suspect in Times Square.</p><p>Tsarnaev's older brother, Tamerlan (TA'-mehr-luhn), died in a shootout with police.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/times_square_was_bombing_suspects_next_target_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/times_square_was_bombing_suspects_next_target_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bloomberg PAC may target Dem who voted against background checks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/bloomberg_pac_may_target_dem_who_voted_against_background_checks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/bloomberg_pac_may_target_dem_who_voted_against_background_checks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mayors against illegal guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[background checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Pryor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkansas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13280792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mayors Against Illegal Guns is reportedly considering running an ad campaign against Sen. Mark Pryor ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Bloomberg's super PAC, Mayors Against Illegal Guns, is reportedly considering running an ad campaign against Sen. Mark Pryor of Arkansas, who was one of four Democrats to vote against the Senate's measure to tighten gun background check laws.</p><p>The <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/politics/mark-pryor-may-soon-have-a-bloomberg-problem-20130423">National Journal</a> cites an anonymous senior official in the group, who said senior members of the super PAC met to discuss possible responses to the failure of gun control legislation:</p><blockquote><p>The Bloomberg group is mulling a variety of messages and methods for Arkansas. One approach would be to target reliable Democratic voters, including African Americans, with advertising that calls out Pryor for “opposing the president’s agenda,” the official said. Another would be to expand the campaign to suburban women and other moderates. The campaign might not be limited to the issue of guns.</p> <p>“Money would not be an object,” the official said, adding that a decision on whether to target Pryor would come soon and that action against other Democrats is still possible.</p></blockquote><p>Pryor is one of the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/mark_pryor_i_still_oppose_gay_marriage/">more vulnerable</a> Democrats up for reelection in 2014.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/bloomberg_pac_may_target_dem_who_voted_against_background_checks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/bloomberg_pac_may_target_dem_who_voted_against_background_checks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Occupy&#8217;s legacy: The media finally covers social protest fairly</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/occupys_legacy_the_media_finally_covers_social_protest_fairly/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/occupys_legacy_the_media_finally_covers_social_protest_fairly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2013 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13266952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Occupy's message about income inequality took hold because the media, for once, took a grassroots protest seriously]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>None of us was prepared for what happened next in Zuccotti Park. It was surprising enough that the police did not immediately evict the occupiers. We expected the most likely scenario was for hundreds of riot cops, backed up by horses and copters, to be unleashed against us that very night. This would certainly be in keeping with the style of the NYPD, whose usual strategy is to overwhelm protesters with sheer force of numbers. Yet in this case, someone made the decision to hold back.</p><p>One reason was the ambiguity of the legal situation: While public parks close by 12 p.m., Zuccotti Park was a public-private hybrid, owned by an investment firm, Brookfield Office Properties. Technically such “privately owned public properties” are accessible to the public twenty-four hours a day. Still, by our experience, the mere existence of such a law would have been of little relevance if the authorities decided they wanted to evict us anyway, but it allowed something of a fig leaf. But why did they even want a fig leaf?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/occupys_legacy_the_media_finally_covers_social_protest_fairly/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/occupys_legacy_the_media_finally_covers_social_protest_fairly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michelle Obama&#8217;s underrated role in gun debate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/michelle_obamas_underrated_role_in_gun_debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/michelle_obamas_underrated_role_in_gun_debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 20:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne LaPierre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Violence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13268120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a gun debate dominated by men, one person finally transcended it by speaking directly to black mothers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much has been made of the prominence of men like President Obama, Michael Bloomberg and Wayne LaPierre in the nation's current debate on gun safety reform. But less attention has been placed on the singular and transformational role of Michelle Obama.</p><p>The first lady elevated the conversation Wednesday, during a rare return to her hometown of Chicago. In a city ravaged by violence, with more than <a href="http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2013-01-01/news/ct-met-chicago-500th-homicide-20121229_1_homicide-rate-gang-violence-illegal-guns">500 gun-related homicides</a> last year alone, she spoke eloquently -- and apolitically -- transcending the partisan politics that seem to subvert her husband's efforts for reasonable gun control legislation.</p><p>But what was most unique was <em>for</em> whom, and <em>to</em> whom, Michelle spoke. Her words gave voice to an oft ignored (but disproportionately affected) victim of America's gun violence: the black mother.</p><p>The first lady spoke of Hadiya Pendleton, the slain 15-year-old student, gunned down just blocks from the Obama's Chicago home -- and only days after Pendleton had attended the president's second inauguration. With tears in her eyes, Michelle said, "Hadiya Pendleton was me and I was her." The first lady went on to add that Pendleton's family is "<a href="http://m.cnsnews.com/news/article/michelle-obama-hadiya-pendleton-was-me-and-i-was-her">just like</a>" her own.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/michelle_obamas_underrated_role_in_gun_debate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/michelle_obamas_underrated_role_in_gun_debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Would Weiner even be a good mayor?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/will_anthony_wiener_ride_again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/will_anthony_wiener_ride_again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Weiner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mayor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Scandal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13267350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's the key question overlooked amid the "Will he run?" chatter and sexting mea culpas]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Long before Anthony Weiner was an unfortunately named joke, he was a national TV presence, high-profile member of Congress and a leading candidate for mayor of New York City. For national progressive activists frustrated with their incrementalist in the White House, and fearing an ascendant and unhinged right, Weiner’s bombastic liberalism was a salve and a rallying point -- and he relished the role of movement leader.</p><p>But now that the former congressman is hinting at a comeback, with an <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/14/magazine/anthony-weiner-and-huma-abedins-post-scandal-playbook.html?pagewanted=all">emotional tell-all interview</a> in the New York Times Magazine and open talk that he's eyeing a run for mayor of New York City, can he recapture that glory on the left? And critically, was he even a good congressman to begin with? Good enough to run the nation's largest city?</p><p>Even among his Democratic compatriots, Weiner was always a bit of a divisive figure: a great communicator and powerful leader, but one who didn’t play well with others. “He operated as a lone ranger, giving a voice to the progressive movement, but not operating as a partner with a larger set of House members or progressives on the outside,” one senior strategist for an outside progressive group said, contrasting him with Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who works closely with partners to advance her agenda.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/will_anthony_wiener_ride_again/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/will_anthony_wiener_ride_again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christine Quinn tries to get Time Warner to pull attack ad</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/christine_quinn_tries_to_get_time_warner_to_pull_attack_ad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/christine_quinn_tries_to_get_time_warner_to_pull_attack_ad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 13:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Mayor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13265646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["You're not allowed to just put up false ads that have incorrect information," Quinn said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New York City Mayoral candidate Christine Quinn is trying to get Cablevision and Time Warner Cable to stop airing an ad that attacks Quinn's "political ambition" and ties to the one percent, saying that there is "incorrect information" in the ad.</p><p>The ad, which <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/christine_quinn_gets_attacked_from_the_left/">began airing</a> on Monday, was paid for by a group of left-leaning labor groups and other Democratic activists, which call themselves NYC Is Not for Sale 2013. The ad shows Quinn's picture amid a cloud of smoke, and says that “Virtually all of Christine Quinn’s decisions were made in rooms just like this, with her friends in the 1%.”</p><p><a href="http://www.ny1.com/content/top_stories/180047/ny1-exclusive--quinn-pressures-ny1-to-stop-airing-attack-ad-on-term-limits--living-wage-bill">NY1</a> reports:</p><blockquote><p>The ad also faults her for changing term limits, saying "She is always on the wrong side. On living wage."</p> <p>Quinn's lawyer says she passed the measure, so she can't be on the wrong side. However, she delayed the vote and passed a watered-down version.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/christine_quinn_tries_to_get_time_warner_to_pull_attack_ad/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/christine_quinn_tries_to_get_time_warner_to_pull_attack_ad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>