<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Michael Moore</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/michael_moore/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Michael Moore and the Oscars get it right</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/09/michael_moore_and_the_oscars_get_it_right/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/09/michael_moore_and_the_oscars_get_it_right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movie Awards Season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12002101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Academy's documentary category has been a horrible mess for years. The controversial new rules can only help]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As <a href="http://http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/09/movies/documentarians-concerned-about-proposed-oscar-rule.html">multiple media sources</a> have reported over the last two days, under proposed new Academy rules, only films that have been reviewed by the New York Times or the Los Angeles Times will be eligible for the best documentary Oscar. But that's not the real story, and it's not nearly as dumb as it sounds.</p><p>"Everybody's getting excited about something that's not the real headline," explains filmmaker and blogger <a href="http://edendale.typepad.com/">AJ Schnack,</a> a co-founder of the documentary-centric <a href="http://www.cinemaeyehonors.com/">Cinema Eye Honors</a> awards. "The headline is that the Academy is making big changes to the way it selects and nominates documentary films, and based on what I know so far, those changes are overwhelmingly positive."</p><p>Perhaps the first thing to understand is that the new docu-Oscar rules, which go much further than eligibility issues, were largely pushed through by Michael Moore, who sits on the Academy's governing board. The intention behind the changes, including the bizarre-sounding NYT/LAT requirement, is to streamline a notoriously clunky and cliquey nominating process, and to ensure that the Oscar-winning documentary is "truly a theatrical motion picture, because that's what these awards are for," as Moore told <a href="http://www.indiewire.com/article/michael-moore-best-documentary-oscar-will-be-chosen-by-the-full-academy">indieWIRE.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/09/michael_moore_and_the_oscars_get_it_right/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/09/michael_moore_and_the_oscars_get_it_right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michael Moore: &#8220;America is not broke&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/06/michael_moore_america_not_broke/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/06/michael_moore_america_not_broke/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2011 22:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/03/06/michael_moore_america_not_broke</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The documentary filmmaker was in Wisconsin yesterday, slamming Republicans for cutting union benefits]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Moore has a <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-moore/america-is-not-broke_b_832006.html">message for Wisconsinites</a>:</p><blockquote>
<p>Contrary to what those in power would like you to believe -- so that you'll give up your pension, cut your wages, and settle for the life your great-grandparents had -- America is not broke.</p>
</blockquote><p>The claim came at the beginning of a speech delivered by the documentary filmmaker and liberal firebrand at the Wisconsin State Captiol yesterday. Over the course of 30 minutes, Moore railed against Republicans, who he accused of misleading the American public when they claim that government <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/02/27/scott_walker_meet_the_press/index.html">can't afford</a> to spend money on expenditures like pensions and union wages. You can watch the entire speech below.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/06/michael_moore_america_not_broke/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/06/michael_moore_america_not_broke/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>199</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Directors of the decade: No. 6: Michael Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/23/directors_decade_michael_moore/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/23/directors_decade_michael_moore/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 01:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best of the Decade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directors of the Decade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/film_salon/2009/12/22/directors_decade_michael_moore</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whether you love him or want to punch him in the mouth, he is rallying the troops in the rhetorical civil war]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Moore is the only documentary filmmaker besides Ken Burns the average American has heard of, and he&#8217;s more of an active presence in American life than Burns, because even when he's not making or promoting a new film, he's on TV and the Internet beating the drum for a cause or tormenting the foes of all he deems good and decent. He is a media-age phenomenon as well as a filmmaker, his presence on the pop culture radar screen a life-as-mass-media-performance-art-project in the vein of previous practitioners, some important, others merely shameless: Andy Warhol, Muhammad Ali, Madonna, Norman Mailer, Gore Vidal, Tiny Tim.</p><p>And whether you think Moore is a brave soul fighting the power or a self-aggrandizing blowhard who&#8217;s mainly selling himself, it&#8217;s clear he has a knack for insinuating himself into the head space of all sorts of people -- those who have no opinion on him, those who are glad he&#8217;s alive, and those who fantasize about pouring a vat of beef stew over his head and tossing him into a pit full of wolverines. I suspect Moore&#8217;s highly subjective, emotion-driven filmmaking and his career-long interweaving of self-promotion and self-expression (which started back in 1989 with his anti-General Motors jeremiad "Roger &amp; Me") will one day be seen as epitomizing aspects of life in this grim, weird decade, just as Hunter S. Thompson&#8217;s song-of-myself political writing helped future generations understand the '70s.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/12/23/directors_decade_michael_moore/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/23/directors_decade_michael_moore/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moore a sign of things to come for Obama?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/11/30/moore_10/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/11/30/moore_10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/11/30/moore</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A prominent liberal breaks, in a big way, with the president over his Afghanistan policy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Tuesday night, President Obama is set to announce that he's sending additional U.S. troops to Afghanistan -- about 30,000 of them. Indeed, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said Monday that the president has already given the order, though for now Gibbs wouldn't say what the actual order was.</p><p>Michael Moore, however, wants to stop him. In <a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/mikes-letter/open-letter-president-obama-michael-moore">an open letter</a> published on his Web site Monday, Moore decried Obama's decision, saying he'll now be known as "the new war president." The director wrote:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/11/30/moore_10/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/11/30/moore_10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>126</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michael Moore and the evils of free enterprise</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/23/capitalism_a_love_story/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/23/capitalism_a_love_story/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitalism: A Love Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2009/09/23/capitalism_a_love_story</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In "Capitalism: A Love Story," the filmmaker takes to the bullhorn to decry corporate greed -- and promote himself]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Moore's ostensible subject has always been his fury at the injustices wrought against hardworking American citizens. And it's possible that, in his early days as a filmmaker, that was his true motivation. But 20 years after "Roger &amp; Me," "Capitalism: A Love Story" proves that Michael Moore's greatest subject is himself. This is a love story, all right, but it has less to do with the flaws of capitalism than it does with Moore's unwavering fondness for the sound of his own voice, and for what he perceives as his own vast cleverness.</p><p>As with all Michael Moore's films, that's not to say he doesn't have a point, buried in there somewhere amid all the Silly Putty-stretched facts and cartoony music. It's possible to agree with Moore in theory and still find his tactics sloppy and ineffective (though his zombie-like followers don't like to allow for the existence of any potential gray areas, maybe because gray areas tend to demand actual thought). In the 2007 <a href="http://www.salon.com/ent/movies/review/2007/06/22/sicko/index.html">"Sicko,"</a> he highlighted some very real, and very dangerous, problems with the U.S. healthcare system. In the 2004 <a href="http://www.salon.com/ent/movies/review/2004/06/23/911_nay/index.html">"Fahrenheit 9/11,"</a> he asserted that our then-president was bad for America, and that the Iraq war was wrong. If you're reading this right now, it's 99 percent likely that you agree, as I do, with Moore's basic take on those subjects.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/09/23/capitalism_a_love_story/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/23/capitalism_a_love_story/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>277</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did humor save the left at its darkest hour?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/05/30/hamm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/05/30/hamm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 10:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Author Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MoveOn.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Satire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily Show]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/int/2008/05/30/hamm</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How did Stephen Colbert become a progressive political force? Theodore Hamm discusses "The New Blue Media," the rise of netroots  and their role in the next administration.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> When future historians write of the long months between the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, there will most likely be a chapter about the overwhelming failure of the mainstream political media to properly question the Bush administration during the buildup to a failed war. Journalists who should have acted as government watchdogs instead acted largely as yes men, spuriously debating what should be done about Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction. </p><p> In that recriminatory chapter, there will likely be a section about the exceptions: left-leaning, often satirical media outlets like "The Daily Show" and the Onion, whose headlines in the run-up to the invasion included "Bush Won't Stop Asking Cheney if We Can Invade Yet" and "Bush Seeks U.N. Support for 'U.S. Does Whatever It Wants Plan.'" These exceptions are the focus of<br />
<href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FNew-Blue-Media-Transforming-Progressive%2Fdp%2F1595580409%3Fie%3DUTF8%26s%3Dbooks%26qid%3D1212069962%26sr%3D8-1&tag=saloncom08-20&linkCode=ur2&camp=1789&creative=9325">"The New Blue Media: How Michael Moore, MoveOn.org, Jon Stewart and Company Are Transforming Progressive Politics" </a> by Theodore Hamm, the founding editor of the arts and politics journal the Brooklyn Rail. The book is what Hamm calls a "critical tribute" to a group of liberal commentators and outlets -- Stephen Colbert, Air America and blogs like <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/">Daily Kos</a> and <a href="http://www.mydd.com/">MyDD</a> -- that have emerged in the last decade. In chronicling their rise and influence, Hamm suggests that some of the most meaningful and independent political discourse has come from the least "serious" of sources. If the book sometimes reads as a bit credulous -- there is perhaps more tribute than criticism here -- it may be because Hamm cannot conceal his gratitude for what was for him an invaluable source of relief in a bleak time. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/05/30/hamm/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/05/30/hamm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From &#8220;Sicko&#8221; to Iraq-o</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/02/23/oscar_docs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/02/23/oscar_docs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beyond the Multiplex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/beyond_the_multiplex//feature/2008/02/23/oscar_docs</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oscar-nominated documentaries as a hotbed of anti-Bush, antiwar ideology? Heaven forfend!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
<div class="art c"> <img class='wp-image-10043066' src='http://media.salon.com/2008/02/story21.jpg' />
<p class="credit">Magnolia Pictures</p>
<p class="caption">"No End In Sight"</p>
</p><p> Let me jump on the question of the day before Rush O'Hannity does: Why does Hollywood hate America? Actually, what I mean to ask is why the Academy Award nominating committee in the documentary-feature category hates America, but that's a long and confusing question. Maybe we'd better go back to Michelle Obama hating America. Now <i>that</i> I can explain. </p><p> Seriously, though, the docu-Oscar nominees of the last two years tell us something about how heartily sick of George W. Bush and his brilliant geo-strategic adventures even the constitutionally controversy-averse human beings of the movie industry have become. In the post-<a href="/ent/movies/review/2004/06/23/fahrenheit_yay/">"Fahrenheit 9/11"</a> era, documentaries have become the liberal riposte to right-wing talk radio, and Hollywood's establishment has pretty well embraced the trend. Lest you believe that nominating a lecture-demonstration by <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/al_gore/">Al Gore,</a> together with two Iraq-war films and a takedown of fundamentalist Christianity, last year was a fluke -- the films in question being <a href="/ent/movies/review/2006/05/24/gore/">"An Inconvenient Truth,"</a> <a href="/ent/movies/review/2006/11/09/btm/">"Iraq in Fragments,"</a> <a href="/ent/movies/review/2006/08/03/btm/">"My Country, My Country"</a> and <a href="/ent/movies/review/2006/09/21/btm/">"Jesus Camp"</a> -- I give you this year's list: <i>three</i> Iraq films and <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/michael_moore/">Michael Moore's</a> takedown of our national healthcare scam. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/02/23/oscar_docs/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/02/23/oscar_docs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Toronto Film Festival</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/09/07/toronto_1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/09/07/toronto_1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 11:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2007/09/07/toronto_1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael Moore brings the world a 102-minute commercial about himself, "Captain Mike Across America." Could that have been his dream all along?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the weirdest records of the '70s was "Having Fun With Elvis On Stage," which consisted wholly of spliced-together patter from the King's live shows, a full two sides of Elvis repeatedly muttering "Thank you very much!" and asking for a drink of water. "Captain Mike Across America" is <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/michael_moore/index.html">Michael Moore's</a> "Having Fun With Elvis On Stage." I'm not sure exactly why this movie exists, although in a twisted way, maybe it's somewhat admirable: It seems that Moore has finally made a 102-minute commercial for himself, which possibly has been his dream all along. </p><p> I saw "Captain Mike Across America" at a press screening here on Thursday night, at the end of the first day of the <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/toronto_film_festival/">Toronto International Film Festival.</a> The screening was held in a theater with a capacity of about 580. I arrived very early, fearing the thing might be crowded -- but I'd be surprised if there were 100 people there, maybe even as few as 50. Is Moore losing some of his magic with the festival-going press, which he could always count on for a reasonable amount of support, or at least some copy? I could almost hear tumbleweeds blowing through that theater; that could be partly because the screening began at 10:15 p.m., by which time any moviegoer's energy level might be a little low. Or could it be that Moore's dud logic and relentless self-congratulation are finally starting to grind down even those who essentially agree with his politics. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/09/07/toronto_1/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/09/07/toronto_1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Sicko&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/06/22/sicko/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/06/22/sicko/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 11:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2007/06/22/sicko</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In his most persuasive film yet, Michael Moore gives the U.S. healthcare system a full exam -- and offers up a grim prognosis.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There's no other way to come at Michael Moore's "Sicko" than to state upfront that his essential argument -- that it's shameful that America, the richest country in the world, fails to provide healthcare for <i>all</i> its citizens -- is irrefutable. No matter how you feel about Moore or his filmmaking tactics, there's little here that any sane, reasonable human could argue with: We've fashioned a system in which big corporations get rich off our illnesses, or even just off the regular preventive steps that most of us take to avoid getting sick. (How many of us have gone to get a routine colonoscopy or pap smear, allegedly "covered" by insurance and designed to detect potentially life-threatening problems early on, only to be hit with several hundred dollars' worth of co-payments and lab fees? On top of whatever premiums we pay to begin with? And that's just the small stuff.) In our system (even calling it a system seems to be granting it too much respect) the poor aren't provided for, and even those in the middle class -- as Moore shows, in a series of bone-rattling anecdotes that may rob your sleep -- can literally lose the roof above their heads or, worse yet, their lives, simply because they either can't afford or are denied healthcare. And that's people who are actually <i>insured.</i> </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/06/22/sicko/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/06/22/sicko/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>138</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;We need to learn to share&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/05/24/moore_27/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/05/24/moore_27/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 11:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beyond the Multiplex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/feature/2007/05/24/moore</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael Moore discusses his bold takedown of the American healthcare system, "Sicko," in a roundtable interview at Cannes -- a Salon podcast.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
<div> <img class='wp-image-10028149' src='http://media.salon.com/2007/05/story23.jpg' /></p><p> To listen to a podcast of the interview, click <a target="new" href="http://salonmedia.vo.llnwd.net/o1/mp3s/2007/may/Cannes_07_OHehir_Moore.mp3">here.</a></p><p>To subscribe: Click <a target="new" href="http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=157190082">here</a> to add Conversations to iTunes or cut and paste the URL into your podcasting software: <br> </p><p> <img class='wp-image-10028152' src='http://media.salon.com/2007/05/conversations_article3.gif' /><p>As you've <a href="/ent/movies/review/2007/05/20/cannes_4/index.html">probably read,</a> one of the event films of this year's <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/cannes/">Cannes Film Festival</a> is <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/michael_moore/">Michael Moore's</a> "Sicko," a blistering attack on the American healthcare system. On Tuesday, at the American Pavilion here at Cannes, Moore met with a small group of North American journalists for an extended -- at times combative -- discussion about the film, viewers' reactions to it and why he finds it disappointing when people focus on his political views rather than his filmmaking. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/05/24/moore_27/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/05/24/moore_27/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Sicko&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/05/20/cannes_4_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/05/20/cannes_4_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 14:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beyond the Multiplex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2007/05/20/cannes_4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael Moore's scathing, important look at the U.S. healthcare system has plenty to rile the far right -- and a lot more to enrage the larger American public.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"I know the storm awaits me back in the United States," Michael Moore told a wall-to-wall throng of reporters here after the Saturday morning press premiere of his new film, "Sicko." Then he heaved a deep breath and added, "But this is just so pleasant." </p><p> It was indeed another gorgeous, summery morning on the French Riviera, but the real heat was indoors. There wasn't a single empty seat inside the Grand Th&eacute;&acirc;tre Lumi&egrave;re -- which holds more than 2,000 people -- for "Sicko," and dozens of stragglers were locked out on the sidewalk. Moore's screed against the outrageous state of American healthcare was received with uproarious affection, but one might argue that Cannes provided the softest possible crowd. An American left-wing populist, attacking America's profit-motive, private-sector ideology before a roomful of international intellectuals, at least half of them Europeans. May I introduce a new phrase into the Franglais dictionary? <i>C'&eacute;tait un slam-dunk.</i> </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/05/20/cannes_4_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/05/20/cannes_4_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>135</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beyond the Multiplex</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/03/12/sxsw_1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/03/12/sxsw_1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 14:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beyond the Multiplex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thrillers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2007/03/12/sxsw_1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Opening weekend at the Austin filmfest offers a controversial documentary about (not by) Michael Moore, an outrageous horror-comedy by Alan Cumming and a few Tarantino impersonations.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few hours after I got here, I walked past some <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/independent_film/">independent filmmaker</a> (I have no idea who) doing a stand-up interview with a local TV crew outside a billiards hall on East Sixth Street, amid the young and well-scrubbed crowds of Austin's nightclub district. "You know, everybody tries to get into Sundance," he was saying into the blinding light. "But the whole time, we were kind of secretly hoping we'd get to come here. That's how it works." </p><p> That is in fact how it works. My unknown friend with the unknown film might have had a better short-term commercial future at <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/sundance/">Sundance</a> (although that's far from a sure thing), but as far as festival quality-of-life issues go, he's in the right place. The <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/south_by_southwest/">South by Southwest Film Festival</a> can't compare with Sundance as an acquisitions marketplace or a high-profile showcase for new movies. Even claiming that SXSW has the countercultural cachet that Sundance once possessed is misleading, because no single event or institution can wield that kind of cultural power in today's fragmented media environment. But it's a pile of fun, and whatever people say about Sundance, they don't say that. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/03/12/sxsw_1/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/03/12/sxsw_1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bin Laden is back; let&#8217;s smear Michael Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/01/20/binladen_8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/01/20/binladen_8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 13:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John F. Kerry, D-Mass.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osama Bin Laden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2006/01/20/binladen</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chris Matthews uses the reemergence of the al-Qaida leader as a chance to attack the left. John Kerry -- John Kerry! -- comes to Moore's defense.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just last month, <a target="new" href="http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/europe/12/20/rumsfeld.ireland/">Donald Rumsfeld</a> was saying that he didn't know whether Osama bin Laden was dead or alive. "I think it is interesting that we haven't heard from him in a year, close to a year," Rumsfeld told reporters traveling with him to Pakistan. "I don't know what it means. I suspect that in any event if he's alive and functioning that he's probably spending a major fraction of his time trying to avoid being caught." </p><p>But now it seems that the al-Qaida leader is very much alive -- and that he's got enough time on his hands to keep a finger on the pulse of American public opinion. That might lead one to wonder whether the Bush administration has done all it can to capture bin Laden, or whether he's really "on the run," as the president likes to say, or whether all the attention the White House has devoted to Iraq might have been better served going after the people who, you know, actually attacked the United States on 9/11 and say they're planning to do it again. </p><p>But that's not what "Hardball's" Chris Matthews thought when he heard the bin Laden tape. Matthews listened to the al-Qaida leader and declared: "He sounds like an over the top Michael Moore here, if not a Michael Moore." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/01/20/binladen_8/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/01/20/binladen_8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Playing the Michael Moore card</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/11/18/murtha_8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/11/18/murtha_8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 17:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2005/11/18/murtha</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The press secretary calls conservative Democrat John Murtha an extremist. It would be funny if it wasn't also true.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know the White House is getting desperate when it tries to play the Michael Moore card on a Vietnam veteran and ex-Marine long regarded as a staunch conservative Democrat. In response to Pennsylvania Rep. John Murtha's speech on Thursday calling for an expedited withdrawal of troops from Iraq, the press secretary's office released a <a target="new" href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/11/20051118.html">terse statement</a> accusing Murtha of "endorsing the policy positions of Michael Moore and the extreme liberal wing of the Democratic party." </p><p>Them's fighting words! But the funny thing is, listening to Murtha <a target="new" href="http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/middle_east/july-dec05/withdrawal_11-17.html">speak on the "NewsHour With Jim Lehrer"</a> last night, he did sound remarkably like someone who could have received prominent placement in "Farenheit 9/11." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/11/18/murtha_8/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/11/18/murtha_8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The perfect storm?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/09/07/storm_5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/09/07/storm_5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2005 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2005/09/07/storm</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael Moore, Cindy Sheehan and Hurricane Katrina.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ladies and gentlemen, we may actually witness Rush Limbaugh's head explode: We received an e-mail message today from <a target= "new" href="http://www.michaelmoore.com/">Michael Moore,</a> who informs us that <a target= "new" href="http://www.meetwithcindy.org/">Cindy Sheehan</a> has dispatched Camp Casey to Louisiana to help provide the sort of hurricane relief that the "colossally inept and incompetent Bush administration" can't seem to deliver.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/09/07/storm_5/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/09/07/storm_5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The mother of all battles</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/08/16/mother_8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/08/16/mother_8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 19:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motherhood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2005/08/16/mother</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cindy Sheehan has almost single-handedly launched an American antiwar movement. And in the process, she's exposed a president's feet of clay.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The smearing will continue, but it's already too late: Cindy Sheehan has launched an American antiwar movement. Maybe, as Matt Drudge blared over the weekend, she's said controversial things about Israel. Maybe the IRS will chase her for tax evasion, since she's reportedly announced that she won't pay taxes for 2004, the year her son Casey died in Iraq. Maybe her family has been shaken by her activism. Maybe the smears will even work, and cost Sheehan some of her mainstream political credibility. It doesn't matter: Someone else will take her place. </p><p> Sheehan's central demand -- that the president meet with her and explain why her son died -- has immense power in a country that's beginning to understand it was lied to about the reasons for the Iraq war, at a time when the carnage seems not only endless but futile. To build on that power, the antiwar movement being born at Camp Casey must understand and hold onto the source of Sheehan's moral authority: her authentic grief over her son's death and her fearless demand to talk honestly about it, even with supporters of the war. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/08/16/mother_8/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/08/16/mother_8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Right Hook</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/04/13/bolton_12/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/04/13/bolton_12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 22:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2004 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//right_hook/2005/04/13/bolton</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Bolton, king of the world! Plus: Karl Rove bootlegs Michael Moore, and James Dobson sees the Ku Klux Klan in the Supreme Court.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> For days now, conservatives have been rallying around President Bush's nominee for U.N. ambassador, the man much noted for his admonition in 1994, "There is no such thing as the United Nations." Since Monday, beneath trademark glasses and bushy mustache, John Bolton has flashed a softer, more diplomatic face during contentious Senate confirmation hearings. But his pundit supporters know better. </p><p> "It's not a moment too soon for strong, effective -- bold -- American leadership at the United Nations," wrote Heritage Foundation fellow <a href="http://www.nypost.com/postopinion/opedcolumnists/42504.htm" target="_blank">Peter Brookes</a> in Monday's <b>New York Post</b>. "The world's largest international institution is in serious need of some 'tough love' -- and the smart money says John Bolton is the right man to give it ... We need an ambassador in New York who can tangle with the increasingly powerful (and confident) Chinese, the ornery Russians and the (always) cranky French on the Security Council." </p><p>While opponents argue Bolton is about as anti-U.N. as they come, Brookes thinks otherwise. Bolton's criticisms of the institution, he says, "have always been inspired by the U.N.'s ideals -- and therefore scathing about its corrupt reality." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/04/13/bolton_12/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/04/13/bolton_12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dude, where&#8217;s your research?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/03/22/moore_25/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/03/22/moore_25/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 00:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2005/03/21/moore</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In "Fahrenheit 9/11" Michael Moore depicted a U.S. military scheming to send poor blacks off to die in Iraq; a new report from the Center for American Progress tells a different story.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember the scene in <a href="http://www.salon.com/ent/movies/review/2004/06/23/911_nay/" target="_blank">"Fahrenheit 9/11"</a> when Michael Moore followed a pair of Marine recruiters to a working-class mall outside Flint, Michigan, where the two riffed on basketball and hip-hop in order to woo several young black men to join the Corps? Moore's implication was that the U.S. military schemed to send a disproportionate number of poor minorities off to fight and die in the war. </p><p>Not so, says a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2005/03/20/opinion/20korb.ready.html" target="_blank">new report</a> from the Center for American Progress: "Two years after the invasion of Iraq, the rising American death toll has prompted some commentators to suggest that poor and minority soldiers are bearing the brunt of the war's human cost. An analysis of casualties by the Center for American Progress in Washington suggests otherwise. The majority of the dead are Army and Marine enlisted personnel, white men in their mid-20's, who graduated from high schools in major cities and suburban areas. Moreover, a look at the poverty rates in the high schools many of them attended suggests that these young men and women are from working-class communities that are neither disproportionately poor nor rich." </p><p>For a more truthful picture of military service in Iraq -- one that's literally more black and white than Moore's, and isn't black and white at all -- <a href="http://www.salon.com/ent/feature/2005/03/04/gunner/" target="_blank">this is the film</a> to see. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/03/22/moore_25/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/03/22/moore_25/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Right Hook</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/02/03/iraqi_election/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/02/03/iraqi_election/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 00:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2004 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Brooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//right_hook/2005/02/02/iraqi_election</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After the vote: Podhoretz rips Democrats, Kerry for not celebrating "Bush's colossal vindication"; Steyn gloats that Iran is next. But a leading neocon acknowledges huge blunders.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the days bookending the Iraqi election, there wasn't a whole lot of sophisticated discussion about the prospect of democracy's taking root in the war-torn region. On Sunday, the day of the vote, New York Times Magazine contributor <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/30/magazine/30WWLN.html" target="_blank">Michael Ignatieff</a> (generally regarded as a "liberal hawk") pointed out the polarized and vapid punditry from both ends of the spectrum -- though he focused on the shortcomings of the political left, which he criticized for its lack of vocal support for Iraqi democracy. Borrowing a riff more typical of the far right, Ignatieff deemed the left's "morose silence" in the face of insurgent violence a "casualty of the corrosive bitterness that still surrounds the initial decision to go to war." </p><p>"Liberals can't bring themselves to support freedom in Iraq," he wrote, "lest they seem to collude with neoconservative bombast. Meanwhile, antiwar ideologues can't support the Iraqis because that would require admitting that positive outcomes can result from bad policies and worse intentions." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/02/03/iraqi_election/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/02/03/iraqi_election/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can the movies rescue America?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2004/12/09/movies_2004/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2004/12/09/movies_2004/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2004 19:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Moore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/feature/2004/12/09/movies_2004</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a year when Mel Gibson and Michael Moore exploited our deep divisions, we needed more Incredible films to bring us together.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> On one of the documentaries included in the handsome new DVD edition of "Gone With the Wind," there's a story about the movie's first super-secret sneak preview at the Fox Theater in Riverside, Calif., two hours outside of Los Angeles. It was a blisteringly hot late summer night and the theater -- "air cooled," remembers William Ericson, a boy at the time and there with his mother -- was packed. The audience had just sat through the B-feature "Hawaiian Nights" and was settling in for Gary Cooper in "Beau Geste" when a man took the stage to tell them that, instead, they had been chosen to see a major Hollywood preview. He wouldn't reveal what they were seeing but did say it was a rather long picture and if anyone wanted to call home they should because the doors of the auditorium were going to be locked. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2004/12/09/movies_2004/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2004/12/09/movies_2004/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

