<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Michele Bachmann, R-Minn.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/michele_bachmann_r_minn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 13:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The HPV vaccine should not be controversial</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/03/pop_rx_hpv/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/03/pop_rx_hpv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 15:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PopRX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann, R-Minn.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The national debate is dominated by myths.  The vaccine works -- and doctors need to encourage teens to get it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here’s a hypothetical question: As your daughter’s doctor, what if I could prescribe a drug that could protect her from cancer? What if I told you that this drug has no known severe side effects, and that she can get it free of charge? The only thing that I would need from you is to show up in my office three times to give your child the entire course of this medicine.</p><p>If you believe me, I’m guessing that this is an offer you can’t refuse. On the other hand, we know U.S. Rep. Michele Bachmann’s answer to my question is "no." That’s because I really do have this drug. It’s called the HPV vaccine, which prevents cervical cancer. I administer it to teens (mostly girls, but increasingly boys) in my practice every day.</p><p>I won’t waste words refuting Bachmann’s <a class="storyLink" href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/09/21/bachmannvaccine/index.html">ridiculous (and campaign-killing)</a> claim that the HPV vaccine causes "mental retardation." But here are the facts: The American Cancer Society estimates that about 4,000 women die from cervical cancer in the United States each year. Approximately $4 billion is spent annually on these conditions. The HPV vaccine is virtually 100 percent effective in preventing infection by strains of the virus associated with 70 percent of cervical cancers. A second HPV vaccine is also highly effective, preventing more than 90 percent of infections. Researchers estimate that if widespread vaccination is achieved, cervical cancer could drop by as much as 77 percent. That’s as close to a cure for cancer as we’ve ever had.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/03/pop_rx_hpv/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/03/pop_rx_hpv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>82</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The incredible vanishing Michele Bachmann</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/22/bachmannvaccine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/22/bachmannvaccine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann, R-Minn.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/09/21/bachmannvaccine</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Her demise following her HPV blunder shows how consent gets manufactured on the pseudo-populist Republican right]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look, Michele Bachmann was never going to be the Republican presidential nominee anyway. Surely even she knew that. Her political celebrity begins and ends with her wide-eyed beauty and penchant for making absurd, faith-based pronouncements on cable TV.</p><p>OK, so Bachmann won a meaningless straw poll in Ames, Iowa -- where old duffers get a free lunch and a bus ride to the state fair in exchange for their votes. Fellow no-hope candidate Ron Paul finished a close second. Even so, the unanimity with which GOP savants turned against the fair Michele after she got in Texas Gov. Rick Perry's face demonstrated how consent gets manufactured on the pseudo-populist Republican right.</p><p>She ought to have known better than to have heeded this column. "If Michele Bachmann <a href="http://mobile.salon.com/politics/war_room/2011/08/17/lyons_rick_perry/index.html">can't make an issue</a> of [Rick Perry's] ill-fated executive order requiring sixth-grade Texas girls to be vaccinated against sexually transmitted diseases," I had written, "she's got no business running."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/22/bachmannvaccine/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/22/bachmannvaccine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bachmann: It&#8217;s ok to spread lies about vaccines because I never said I&#8217;m a doctor</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/16/bachmann_not_doctor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/16/bachmann_not_doctor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann, R-Minn.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Autism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/09/16/bachmann_not_doctor</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After claiming that the life-saving HPV vaccine causes "mental retardation," the candidate declines to apologize]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other day, Michele Bachmann <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/09/15/bachmann_vaccines/index.html">said that the HPV vaccine made someone "mentally retarded,"</a> which is not only untrue but also the sort of remark that leads to parents denying their children vaccines that could save their lives.</p><p>When confronted on this, after a few days of both liberals and conservatives decrying her, Bachmann did not really apologize or correct the record. Instead, she said it's OK for her to say things like that because she never told anyone she's a doctor. As long as you don't lie about a doctor, you can claim anything you like about medical matters, on TV, and it's OK! (I'm not a doctor but I heard that if you make your baby wear a onesie with a "funny" slogan on it your baby will die.)</p><p>     <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/nov05election/index">From the San Francisco Chronicle:</a>   </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/16/bachmann_not_doctor/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/16/bachmann_not_doctor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>246</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Joe Lieberman loves Rick Perry and Michele Bachmann</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/16/lieberman_perry_bachmann/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/16/lieberman_perry_bachmann/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Lieberman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann, R-Minn.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/09/16/lieberman_perry_bachmann</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The outgoing senator trolls liberals once more by lavishing praise on two of the GOP's most extreme]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe Lieberman is retiring from the U.S. Senate, because he's a widely hated troll with no chance of winning another term, but before he goes he's going to take every opportunity possible to do what he feels G-d Himself sent him to Congress to do: <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/12/16/still_ok_to_hate_lieberman/index.html">Annoy liberals.</a> Today, <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/277277/faith-joe-lieberman-robert-costa">he gives an interview to the National Review</a> in which he lavishes praise on two Republican presidential candidates.</p><p>Lieberman, the "model purple senator" and avowed champion of moderation, is surely praising centrist Republican Jon Huntsman and pragmatic former blue-state governor Mitt Romney, right? Nope. Lieberman instead has kind words for Michele Bachmann and Rick Perry, the 2012 race's two most outspoken conservatives.</p><p>Why does Joe Lieberman, former Democratic candidate for vice president, like Bachmann and Perry so much? (I mean besides because those two are the ones who inspire the more liberal fear and loathing?) Because Bachmann and Perry share Joe Lieberman's love of constant sanctimonious religious moralizing, <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/277277/faith-joe-lieberman-robert-costa">of course.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/16/lieberman_perry_bachmann/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/16/lieberman_perry_bachmann/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>87</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michele Bachmann moves to the left (on crazy conspiracy theories)</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/15/bachmann_vaccines/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/15/bachmann_vaccines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann, R-Minn.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Autism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/09/15/bachmann_vaccines</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The suddenly flailing 2012 candidate adopts the popular liberal myth that injections are dangerous]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michele Bachmann said that the HPV vaccine makes babies "retarded." This is easily the dumbest, most irresponsible and inflammatory comment she's made in years. <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/newsdesk/2011/09/hpv-perry-and-bachmann.html">It began at Monday's debate,</a> when she attacked Rick Perry for his now infamous decision to require that girls receive the vaccine. "Little girls who have a negative reaction to this potentially dangerous drug don&#8217;t get a mulligan."</p><p>She accused Perry of only supporting the policy for money:</p><blockquote> <p>What I&#8217;m saying is that it&#8217;s wrong for a drug company, because the governor&#8217;s former chief of staff was the chief lobbyist for this drug company. The drug company gave thousands of dollars in political donations to the governor, and this is just flat-out wrong. The question is, is it about life, or was it about millions of dollars and potentially billions for a drug company?</p> </blockquote><p>She got <em>worse</em> after the debate, on Fox and the "Today" show, when she said an unnamed mother told her that <a href="http://blogs.citypages.com/blotter/2011/09/michele_bachmann_hpv_vaccine_mental_retardation.php">her daughter became "retarded"</a> after receiving the vaccine.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/15/bachmann_vaccines/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/15/bachmann_vaccines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>189</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Farewell, third-tier candidates</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/08/debate_goodbye/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/08/debate_goodbye/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann, R-Minn.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Santorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/09/08/debate_goodbye</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last night's Republican debate was one of our last chances to laugh at the guys with no shot at the nomination]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the most telling moment of last night's Republican debate came not when Rick Perry said "propes" instead of "props," but when he appeared to forget Rick Santorum's name. "Let me just respond to the last individual," Perry said, as he avoided answering a question about America's persistent racial inequities. <a href="salon.com/politics/war_room/2011/09/06/official_campaign_start/index.html">With the press-appointed "official start"</a> of the 2012 campaign, and the first debate featuring all the universally acknowledged front-runners who are actually running, it is time for us to bid a regretful goodbye to those individuals who make the early months of the campaign fun: the third-tier fringe candidates like Rick Santorum.</p><p>You could tell when the Politico/MSNBC-sponsored debate began that the moderators wished there were fewer people onstage. Almost the first 15 minutes of the debate were spent on an argument solely involving the only two people with a shot at the nomination: Rick Perry and Mitt Romney. Brian Williams and John Harris clearly preferred addressing their serious questions to those two, and many of the questions aimed at the others onstage were <em>about</em> one of those two ex-governors. Poor Michele Bachmann, heretofore the only credible non-Romney candidate, seemed barely to be present. Huntsman got a lot of airtime, but he's been getting plenty of press attention this whole time.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/08/debate_goodbye/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/08/debate_goodbye/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>89</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ladies, you&#8217;re no Maggie Thatcher</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/07/thatcher_palin_bachmann/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/07/thatcher_palin_bachmann/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann, R-Minn.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/09/07/thatcher_palin_bachmann</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann both lay claim to the prime minister's legacy -- but they really don't measure up]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Ronald Reagan in his centenary year now regarded as one of the great presidents, and two of his political heirs, Michele Bachmann and possibly Sarah Palin, eyeing bids for the White House, it is a good moment to look again at Reagan's great British ally, Margaret Thatcher.</p><p>More than 30 years after Britain's first woman prime minister entered Downing Street, America is still searching for its first female president. Sarah Palin has named Thatcher as one of her heroines, and Michele Bachmann <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20100615-503544.html">compared herself to the former prime minister last week</a> (and may well do it again during tonight's GOP debate). How do the Tea Party pretenders measure up to Britain's Iron Lady?</p><p>The important thing to realize about Margaret Thatcher is what a remarkable phenomenon she was. She fought her way up from a very modest background purely by merit, determination and hard work, at a time -- the 1950s and 1960s -- when women politicians were very few, mainly unmarried or childless and usually confined to "feminine" portfolios like education or government price controls. While her children were still very young she read for the bar, practiced as a tax lawyer, overcame the prejudice of selection committees to get herself elected to Parliament and quickly became a junior minister. Professional women juggling motherhood with demanding jobs are quite normal today; but Thatcher was a feminist pioneer long before she became prime minister.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/07/thatcher_palin_bachmann/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/07/thatcher_palin_bachmann/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2012 campaign officially starting now, according to press</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/06/official_campaign_start/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/06/official_campaign_start/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 14:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann, R-Minn.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/09/06/official_campaign_start</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Political analysts returning from summer vacation agree: Now this election stuff is totally for real]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy official beginning of the 2012 campaign! Sure, it sort of started back in 2008, and it sort of semi-officially started with the first candidate debate in May, and we've all basically known who the proper serious candidates will be since Perry joined the race, and the Ames Straw Poll was already considered the official start to the campaign, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/the-2012-race-begins-this-month/2011/09/02/gIQA5053yJ_story.html">but the Washington Post's Dan Balz says</a>, "The month of September will be the moment when the 2012 campaign takes shape," which means now everything is for real. Isn't it exciting?</p><p>The race starts now in part because the field is settled and more debates will take place this month, but it is actually the "official" start to the race because everyone is back from summer vacation. Sure, there have been reporters in Iowa and New Hampshire all summer, but all the stuff that happened last month was just a preview for the for-real campaign that begins, like the school year, after Labor Day.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/06/official_campaign_start/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/06/official_campaign_start/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Truthers and Birthers &#8230; and now Tenthers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/bachmann_perry_10th_amendment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/bachmann_perry_10th_amendment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 19:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann, R-Minn.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/31/bachmann_perry_10th_amendment</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bachmann, Perry and other odd theorists who think the U.S. government is unconstitutional]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michele Bachmann likes to call herself a "constitutional conservative." As her campaign wears on, she owes the country a clearer understanding of precisely what this means. Now comes Texas Gov. Rick Perry, the new leader in the Republican nomination race polls, with a record of similar publicly uttered impulses that seems to want to use the 10th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution to repeal most of the 20th century.</p><p>It's not really new for "tenthers" like Bachmann and Perry to enlist the 10th Amendment as an argument against programs they dislike, although their tentherist utterances exceed similar impulses by yesterday's righties.</p><p>Don't get your hopes up, but wouldn't it be great if this campaign, especially the Bachmann and Perry campaigns, led the country to face the fundamental question of tentherism?</p><p>For those of you coming late to the discussion, the Tenth Amendment, written by James Madison to fulfill a bargain even though he thought it unnecessary, states:</p><p>"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/bachmann_perry_10th_amendment/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/bachmann_perry_10th_amendment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>81</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>O&#8217;Donnell, Bachmann, Palin failures point to growing crazy fatigue</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/bachmann_odonnell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/bachmann_odonnell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann, R-Minn.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Census]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/31/bachmann_odonnell</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exploitation of liberal-scaring culture war heroines growing less profitable every day]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The liberal media will never lose their obsession with the photogenic crazies of the conservative movement, but there are a few hints (enough for a trend piece) that the public at large is getting a bit sick of them. (The outlier is Rick Perry's poll numbers.)</p><p>The Newsweek Michele Bachman cover <a href="http://www.adweek.com/news/press/controversy-selling-tina-brown-134479">posted newsstand sales no higher than most other Newsweek covers</a>. The <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh/politics/2011/08/09/bachmann_photo_not_sexist">"crazy eyes" cover</a> moved 47,225 copies, according to Newsweek, though AdWeek says other industry sources say it sold somewhere between 35,000 and 48,000. Is that good? Well, "the magazine's single copy sales averaged 46,561 per issue in the first half of 2011."</p><p>We are talking only about newsstand sales, not total circulation, but this does mean that Bachmann's incredibly controversial and very buzzy crazy eyes did not "move the needle," as annoying people say. Of course, the actual <em>article</em> about Bachmann, inside of the eye-grabbing cover, <a href="salon.com/politics/war_room/2011/08/08/bachmann_theocrat_nyer/">was pretty bland.</a> But since when does the quality of the journalism have anything to do with newsstand sales?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/bachmann_odonnell/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/bachmann_odonnell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michele Bachmann officially a boring establishment candidate now</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/30/bachmann_boring_establishment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/30/bachmann_boring_establishment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann, R-Minn.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/30/bachmann_boring_establishment</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Fund is apparently ghost-writing her sure-to-be disappointing memoir]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michele Bachmann's got a book coming out! This is barely news -- her book deal with Penguin's conservative Sentinel imprint <a href="http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/06/16/bachmann-said-to-have-deal-for-memoir/">leaked in June</a> -- but now it's apparently finished and ready for a <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/29/michele-bachmann-memoir_n_940977.html">November release</a>, giving voters a full year to finish reading it before voting for her for president. Most presidential candidates churn out a "memoir" to drum up some easy press coverage. And most candidate memoirs are forgettable -- extended official bios destined to be read only by miserable campaign reporters.</p><p>But Bachmann's will be widely remarked upon, picked over by bloggers and journalists, and probably a best-seller. It will also be just a boring as Bill Richardson's <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Between-Worlds-Making-American-Life/dp/B001G8WP6C/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1314658184&amp;sr=8-2">"Between Worlds: The Making of an American Life."</a> Because the book marks the completion of Michele Bachmann's transformation into an establishment candidate.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/30/bachmann_boring_establishment/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/30/bachmann_boring_establishment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Michele Bachmann would have to do to deliver on her $2/gallon gasoline pledge</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/23/bachmann_gas_prices/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/23/bachmann_gas_prices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 22:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann, R-Minn.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/23/bachmann_gas_prices</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, it could potentially be done -- but wait until you see what the cost of doing it would be]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has been a week since Congresswoman Michele Bachmann told the country that she would bring gasoline prices down to under $2 per gallon if she were president. The reaction has run from "Wow! Can she really do that?" to "There is no way a president can determine the cost of gasoline." Candidate Bachmann has been pilloried by the left for her hubris, grandiosity, cynical political posturing and failure to grasp the realities of a world petroleum market.</p><p>The critics are wrong. A president of the United States can drive gasoline prices down, and the promise to do so is not new. Though Bachmann did not immediately provide a plan on how she would drive prices at the pump lower, there have been many plans promoted to lower the price of gasoline, and she may have drawn from some of them.</p><p>She may have been listening to The Donald. In his short-lived run for the White House, Donald Trump said he would bring the price of oil down by seizing the oil fields of Iraq and Libya and putting total production of these two countries in our gasoline stations. Two problems with that scenario: First, the seized oil would have to first pass through the world market where it would be available to the highest bidder. And two, it would be a criminal act of the highest order. Details.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/23/bachmann_gas_prices/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/23/bachmann_gas_prices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>59</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Christian right&#8217;s &#8220;dominionist&#8221; strategy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/21/posner_nar_dominionism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/21/posner_nar_dominionism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 13:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann, R-Minn.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/21/posner_nar_dominionism</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The emergence of Rick Perry and Michele Bachmann as top presidential candidates is a story 30 years in the making]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An <a href="https://www.texasobserver.org/cover-story/rick-perrys-army-of-god">article</a> in the Texas Observer last month about Texas Gov. Rick Perry's relationship with followers of a little-known neo-Pentecostal movement sparked a frenzied reaction from many commentators: Dominionism! Spiritual warfare! Strange prophecies!</p><p>All the attention came in the weeks before and after "<a href="http://www.religiondispatches.org/archive/politics/4972/rick_perry%E2%80%99s_jesus_imperative%3A_a_report_from_saturday%E2%80%99s_mega-rally/">The Response</a>," Perry's highly publicized prayer rally modeled on what organizers believe is the "solemn assembly" described in Joel 2, in which "end-times warriors" prepare the nation for God's judgment and, ultimately, Christ's return. This "new" movement, the New Apostolic Reformation, is one strand of neo-Pentecostalism that draws on the ideas of dominionism and spiritual warfare. Its adherents display gifts of the spirit, the religious expression of Pentecostal and charismatic believers that includes speaking in tongues, prophecy, healing and a belief in signs, wonders and miracles. These evangelists also preach the "Seven Mountains" theory of dominionism: that Christians need to take control of different sectors of public life, such as government, the media and the law.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/21/posner_nar_dominionism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/21/posner_nar_dominionism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>417</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bachmann campaign roughing up reporters</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/bachmann_goons/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/bachmann_goons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann, R-Minn.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/18/bachmann_goons</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The congresswoman's staff is unapologetic about pushing, threatening journalists trying to cover her]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michele Bachmann's goons spend a lot of time threatening and physically harassing reporters, and the campaign is not particularly apologetic about it, <a href="http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=DA99D4E2-56FE-430B-9612-CC7D24E02D58">Politico reports today</a>. Bachmann has some aggro old guy -- they claim he's a former Secret Service agent but considering that this is the Bachmann campaign he is just as likely to be a former ice cream truck driver or used sporting goods salesman or just some guy they found on Craigslist claiming to be a Secret Service agent -- who treats the candidate like she's the president in a war zone instead of a marginal celebrity congressperson wandering around Iowa, America's most harmless state. There are also two identical blond "advance" women who pushed poor Don Lemon into a golf cart.</p><p>Mr. Special Agent Grabby also threatened to break a reporter's arm. The reporter is both Norwegian and conservative, making him the least likely threat to Michele Bachmann alive.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/bachmann_goons/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/bachmann_goons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>90</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The words you&#8217;ll never hear Michele Bachmann say: &#8220;I was wrong&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/16/bachmann_iran_iraq/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/16/bachmann_iran_iraq/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann, R-Minn.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/16/bachmann_iran_iraq</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I caught her in a whopper on Iran back in 2007. She smeared me and we haven't spoken since]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In early 2007, I got a tip that led me to something pretty strange -- well, somewhere between delusional or apocalyptic, really -- that Rep. Michele Bachmann had said, on tape and beyond dispute about an important national security matter, in a podcast interview with a St. Cloud reporter.</p><p>Why talk about it now? Well, as the presidential field winnows down to just one Minnesotan, and Bachmann is routinely described as a top-tier contender for the nomination, inquiring minds who haven't witnessed Bachmann's gravity-defying act from as close-up for as long as we Minnesotans have need our help in understanding just what the heck is up with her.</p><p>I covered Bachmann extensively from the year of her first congressional race until she stopped returning my calls, perhaps because of the story I'm about to recount. But the tale offers a detailed case study of one of Bachmann's signature traits. It's her pattern of saying things she can't back up and wiggling through the ensuing questions without ever acknowledging the falsehood or explaining how she came to say it in the first place.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/16/bachmann_iran_iraq/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/16/bachmann_iran_iraq/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>118</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>These are the choices the GOP is stuck with</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/15/gop_candidates_2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/15/gop_candidates_2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 16:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann, R-Minn.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/15/gop_candidates_2012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal begs for someone, anyone to rescue the party from Mitt, Rick and Michele]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rupert Murdoch's Wall Street Journal plays a major role in shaping and driving the political conversation on the right. Republican Party leaders and activists and other conservative media outlets frequently take their cues from the Journal's editorial page, amplifying the ideas and attitudes the paper embraces. What is the paper's opinion one day can quickly become mass opinion on the right.</p><p>This is why <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111903480904576507933332443602.html?mod=ITP_opinion_2">the Journal's lead editorial today</a> is worth paying close attention to. It comes after an eventful weekend in the GOP&#160;presidential race, one that <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/08/13/iowa_straw_poll/">clearly defined the race</a> as a three-way competition between Mitt Romney, Rick Perry and Michele Bachmann. The Journal, though, isn't exactly impressed with any of them. When it comes to Bachmann, the editorial is at its most scathing:</p><blockquote> <p>Mrs. Bachmann has a record of errant statements (see Battle of Lexington and Concord, history of) that are forgiven by Fox Nation but won't be if she makes them as a GOP standard-bearer.</p> <p>More substantively, her attempt to position herself at all times as the anti-establishment outsider has made her seem on occasion less principled than opportunistic.</p> </blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/15/gop_candidates_2012/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/15/gop_candidates_2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>106</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Michele Bachmann&#8217;s submission theology really means</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/15/bachmann_submission/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/15/bachmann_submission/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 12:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann, R-Minn.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/15/bachmann_submission</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann wasn't exactly candid about her "biblical worldview" during last week's GOP debate]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the Washington Examiner's Byron York asked Michele Bachmann if she was submissive to her husband at the Fox News GOP debate Thursday night, the crowd gasped and booed. That's because wifely submission -- also known as complementarian theology -- is central to the faith of many evangelicals. York's question wasn't about religion per se, but was an attempt to probe whether, if Bachmann became president, America would be getting Marcus' decisions and not hers.</p><p>It's common for Christian politicians questioned about their adherence to submission theology to dodge a scriptural explanation, as Bachmann did. After all, while dominionist-minded evangelicals like Bachmann intentionally set out to bring their "<a href="http://www.religiondispatches.org/dispatches/sarahposner/4466/can_michele_bachmann_win_iowa">biblical worldview</a>" into politics, they recognize that it's bad 21st century politics -- especially for a female candidate -- to admit to a theology that could cause the same gasps and boos from voters who would recoil at the image of an obedient wife as president of the United States.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/15/bachmann_submission/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/15/bachmann_submission/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>295</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bachmann challenged on anti-gay comments</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/15/bachmann_challenged_gay_stance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/15/bachmann_challenged_gay_stance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 11:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morning Clip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann, R-Minn.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/15/bachmann_challenged_gay_stance</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MSNBC's David Gregory pushes the congresswoman on extreme statements from her past]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michele Bachmann -- the winner of the weekend's Ames Straw Poll -- once again dodged questions about her views on gays and lesbians on Sunday.</p><p>Appearing on MSNBC's "Meet the Press," she told host David Gregory, "I don't judge them," when pushed to clarify her views.</p><p>Gregory noted that comments she made in 2004 certainly sounded like judgment (including her suggestion at the time that homosexuality was "personal enslavement" and a "sexual dysfunction.")</p><p>Bachmann tried to suggest that such issues were not important to her presidential run, but Gregory was quick to note that the congresswoman had in the past called gay marriage a "defining" political issue of our time.</p><p>When asked whether she would consider appointing an openly gay judge, Bachmann refused to give a firm answer, saying only "I have my criteria."</p><p>Watch the clip below:&#160;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/15/bachmann_challenged_gay_stance/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/15/bachmann_challenged_gay_stance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pawlenty&#8217;s awkward Bachmann moment</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/12/pawlenty_bachmann_awkward_moment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/12/pawlenty_bachmann_awkward_moment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 12:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morning Clip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann, R-Minn.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Pawlenty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/12/pawlenty_bachmann_awkward_moment</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Watch the Minnesota governor's embarrassing interchange with the tea party darling during the Iowa debate]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As our own <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/2012_elections/index.html?story=/politics/war_room/2011/08/11/gop_debate_iowa">Steve Kornacki noted</a> about Thursday night's Republican presidential candidate debate, Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty gave a "stammering, incoherent response" when asked about the criticisms he's levelled against Michele Bachmann on the campaign trail, with the congresswoman standing right next to him.</p><p>Both candidates attacked each other's political records (Pawlenty as governor; Bachmann in Congress) and as Kornacki put it, "her words were strong, but so was her delivery.. Pawlenty&#8217;s delivery, on the other hand, called to mind a hostage tape, a man saying words that he knows he has to say, but doesn&#8217;t really want to or know how to."</p><p>We thought you might want to see the clip of the most heated moment in the Iowa debate, via Mediaite:&#160;</p><p>     <iframe allowtransparency="true" frameborder="0" height="421" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0" scrolling="no" src="http://videos.mediaite.com/embed/player/?layout=&amp;playlist_cid=&amp;media_type=video&amp;content=Y7M9YV2F11J5RJWM&amp;read_more=1&amp;widget_type_cid=svp" width="420"></iframe>   </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/12/pawlenty_bachmann_awkward_moment/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/12/pawlenty_bachmann_awkward_moment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Steinem on Bachmann sexism: &#8220;Borderline&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/10/steinem_on_bachmann_photo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/10/steinem_on_bachmann_photo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 04:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann, R-Minn.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh//politics/2011/08/09/steinem_on_bachmann_photo</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The feminist pioneer weighs in on claims that Newsweek's photo was bigoted against a female politician]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh/politics/2011/08/09/bachmann_photo_not_sexist/index.html">I wrote earlier today</a> that I didn't think Newsweek's photo of a zealous-looking Michele Bachmann was sexist. Mainly I thought the photo was newsworthy; I also pointed to many shots of male politicians who looked similarly hopped-up.</p><p>The National Organization of Women's Terry O'Neill disagreed, saying &#8220;It&#8217;s sexist...Gloria Steinem has a very simple test: If this were done to a man or would it ever be done to a man &#8211; has it ever been done to a man? Surely this has never been done to a man.&#8221;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/10/steinem_on_bachmann_photo/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/10/steinem_on_bachmann_photo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>80</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
