<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Middle East</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/middle_east/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 16:58:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Egyptian protestors gather before military deadline</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/egyptian_protestors_gather_before_military_deadline_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/egyptian_protestors_gather_before_military_deadline_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 13:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Egypt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mohammed Morsi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arab Spring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13349512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At least 16 people have been killed in clashes since Sunday]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CAIRO (AP) — With a military deadline for intervention ticking down, protesters seeking the ouster of Egypt's Islamist president sought Tuesday to push the embattled leader further toward the edge with another massive display of people power.</p><p>Meanwhile, Mohammed Morsi faced fissures from within after a stunning surge of street rage reminiscent of Egypt's Arab Spring revolution in 2011 that cleared the way for Morsi's long-suppressed Muslim Brotherhood to win the first open elections in decades.</p><p>Three government spokesmen were the latest to quit as part of high-level defections that underscored his increasing isolation and fallout from the ultimatum from Egypt's powerful armed forces to either find a political solution by Wednesday or the generals would seek their own way to end the political chaos.</p><p>The Cabinet, led by the Morsi-backed Prime Minister Hesham Qandil, was scheduled to meet later Tuesday. But the defense and interior ministers were expected to boycott in a sign of support for the military's warnings.</p><p>The police, which are under control of the Interior Ministry, have stood on the sidelines of the protests, refusing even to protect the offices of the Muslim Brotherhood that have been attacked and ransacked.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/egyptian_protestors_gather_before_military_deadline_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/egyptian_protestors_gather_before_military_deadline_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Egypt&#8217;s army stage another coup?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/will_egypts_army_stage_another_coup_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/will_egypts_army_stage_another_coup_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 15:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GlobalPost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Egypt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cairo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim Brotherhood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13347262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The military has given the country's rival forces 48 hours to resolve the current political crisis]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.globalpost.com/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_globalPostInline.gif" alt="Global Post" /></a> CAIRO, Egypt — Egypt's military said Monday that it will give the country's rival political forces 48 hours to resolve the current political crisis, or it will intervene with a roadmap for the nation's future.</p><p>The statement was read and broadcast live on state television.</p><p>Sixteen Egyptians were killed and hundreds more injured after a day of mass protests nationwide Sunday gave way to violent clashes outside the ruling Muslim Brotherhood headquarters in Cairo overnight.</p><p>Millions took to the streets in Cairo and other cities — in demonstrations that dwarfed the protests of the uprising two years ago — to call for President Mohamed Morsi, a former Brotherhood leader, to step down after a turbulent year in power.</p><p>As night fell, demonstrators besieged the Islamist movement’s headquarters — throwing rocks and Molotov cocktails, to which Brotherhood members holed up inside responded with gunfire, witnesses said. Eight peopled were killed in ensuing clashes, and protesters eventually ransacked and looted the office, according to the health ministry.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/will_egypts_army_stage_another_coup_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/will_egypts_army_stage_another_coup_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Al Jazeera: The most-feared news network</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/15/al_jazeera_the_most_feared_news_network/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/15/al_jazeera_the_most_feared_news_network/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Jazeera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13324375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Al Jazeera is well-funded and doesn't need to make money. But its prospects, here and in Middle East, are uncertain]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Arab media explosion that recently has culminated in uprisings across the region springs from two interrelated sources: the growth of satellite television and the affordability of the receivers to the Arab masses, and the common language that Arabs share across state boundaries. Arabic unified a media market of some 350 million people in twenty-two countries and beyond.</p><p>Even before television, in the 1950s and 1960s there had been a dramatic increase in radio usage across the Arab world, especially after the rise of transistor and short-wave radios and their availability to the masses. The most striking and influential example was Sawt al-Arab Radio (“Voice of the Arabs”), sponsored by Egypt to spread Nasser’s Pan-Arabist message in the 1950s and 1960s. This station was so popular across the region that it presented real challenges to Nasser’s political opponents among the conservative Arab rulers in places like Saudi Arabia and Jordan, who attempted to jam the broadcasts.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/15/al_jazeera_the_most_feared_news_network/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/15/al_jazeera_the_most_feared_news_network/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US determines Syria crossed &#8220;red line&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/us_determines_syria_crossed_red_line_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/us_determines_syria_crossed_red_line_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 21:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red line]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13325797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama administration concludes Syrian regime used chemical weapons; hasn't decided how it will respond]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON -- U.S. officials say the Obama administration has concluded that Syrian President Bashar Assad's regime has used chemical weapons against the opposition seeking to overthrow him, crossing what President Barack Obama called a 'red line'.</p><p>However, the officials said the administration has not determined how it will respond.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/us_determines_syria_crossed_red_line_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/us_determines_syria_crossed_red_line_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jon Stewart&#8217;s &#8220;Daily Show&#8221; send-off</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/07/jon_stewarts_daily_show_send_off/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/07/jon_stewarts_daily_show_send_off/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily Show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rosewater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maziar bahari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13319698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The comedian discusses his film and bids a temporary farewell to the satirical news program]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"The Daily Show" host Jon Stewart took a break from the comedy last night to address his <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/jon_stewart_to_take_a_three_month_hiatus_from_the_daily_show_to_direct_his_first_film/">summer hiatus</a>, during which he will direct "Rosewater," a film based on journalist Maziar Bahari's experience being detained and tortured in Iran.</p><p>Stewart, who also wrote the screenplay for the film, has a special tie to Bahari's story: Bahari landed in Iranian jail a week after his participation in a 2009 "Daily Show" segment on Iran.</p><p>Stewart replayed "Minarets of Menace," a segment for which "we actually tried to get a correspondent into Iran because they had been nicknamed the axis of evil," Stewart explained. "We wanted to see who these evil people were," he said in jest. In the segment, correspondent Jason Jones interviewed Bahari about life in Iran:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/07/jon_stewarts_daily_show_send_off/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/07/jon_stewarts_daily_show_send_off/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America&#8217;s newest Cold War</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/30/americas_newest_cold_war_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/30/americas_newest_cold_war_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 15:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cold War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congressional Research Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13312719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Russia, China and the U.S. are all heightening regional tensions in Asia via arms deals    ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did Washington just give Israel the green light for a future attack on Iran via an arms deal?  Did Russia just signal its further support for Bashar al-Assad’s Syrian regime via an arms deal?  Are the Russians, the Chinese, and the Americans all heightening regional tensions in Asia via arms deals?  Is it possible that we’re witnessing the beginnings of a new Cold War in two key regions of the planet -- and that the harbingers of this unnerving development are arms deals?</p><p>International weapons sales have proved to be a thriving global business in economically tough times.  According to the Congressional Research Service (CRS), such sales <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/27/world/middleeast/us-foreign-arms-sales-reach-66-3-billion-in-2011.html" target="_blank">reached</a> an impressive $85 billion in 2011, nearly double the figure for 2010.  This surge in military spending reflected efforts by major Middle Eastern powers to bolster their armories with modern jets, tanks, and missiles -- a process constantly encouraged by the leading arms manufacturing countries (especially the U.S. and Russia) as it helps keep domestic production lines humming.  However, this familiar if always troubling pattern may soon be overshadowed by a more ominous development in the global arms trade: the revival of far more targeted Cold War-style weapons sales aimed at undermining rivals and destabilizing regional power balances.  The result, inevitably, will be a more precarious world.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/30/americas_newest_cold_war_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/30/americas_newest_cold_war_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Could fracking make the Persian Gulf irrelevant?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/30/could_fracking_make_the_persian_gulf_irrelevant_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/30/could_fracking_make_the_persian_gulf_irrelevant_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 12:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GlobalPost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Persian Gulf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belgium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saudi Arabia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13312637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[America's natural gas supply could have a major impact on European markets -- and its stake in the Middle East]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.globalpost.com/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_globalPostInline.gif" alt="Global Post" /></a> BRUSSELS, <a href="http://www.globalpost.com/internal/section-config/benelux">Belgium</a> — America's fracking revolution is changing the dynamics of world energy.</p><p>Since November, the <a href="http://www.globalpost.com/internal/section-config/united-states">United States</a> has replaced <a href="http://www.globalpost.com/internal/section-config/saudi-arabia">Saudi Arabia</a> as the world's biggest producer of crude oil. It had already overtaken Russia as the leading producer of natural gas.</p><p>The emergence of the United States as a global energy superpower has a profound strategic impact that is raising expectations and concerns among America's allies.</p><p>“This is something that is going to change not only the energy market in the world, but everything else,” said Jeppe Kofod, a Danish lawmaker who is drafting a report on the oil and gas revolution for NATO's Parliamentary Assembly.</p><p>“It has huge political and geo-strategic implications,” Kofod told a recent meeting of legislators from the 28 alliance nations.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/30/could_fracking_make_the_persian_gulf_irrelevant_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/30/could_fracking_make_the_persian_gulf_irrelevant_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S., European powers foreground armed support for Syrian rebels</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/28/u_s_supports_e_u_easing_of_syria_arms_embargo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/28/u_s_supports_e_u_easing_of_syria_arms_embargo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bashar al-Assad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no-fly zone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13311074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATE: U.S. officials reject reports of new no-fly zone plans]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Updated 5:20 p.m. EST:</strong> According to NBC's Richard Engel, military officials are denying reports from the Daily Beast that new plans for a no-fly zone over Syria have been put in place:</p><p>[embedtweet id="339486539618865153"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="339487307151314944"]</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Original post:</strong> Prospects for peace talks over the Syrian civil war looked grim Tuesday, as the U.S. and E.U. butted heads with Russia over sending arms to opposing sides in the bloody conflict. The U.S. has praised Europe's decision to ease an arms embargo against Syrian rebels, although major European forces Britain and France have not gone so far as to arm Syrian rebels. As the Guardian<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/may/28/israel-warns-russia-against-arming-syrian-rebels?guni=Network%20front:network-front%20main-3%20Main%20trailblock:Network%20front%20-%20main%20trailblock:Position1"> noted:</a></p><blockquote><p>British officials said the lifting of the embargo had a political purpose, increasing pressure on President Bashar al-Assad and his supporters, Russia and Iran, to make concessions at Geneva, and most importantly to agree not to play a role in a transitional Syrian government. If that fails, the officials said western arms supplies would strengthen moderate elements in the opposition who are currently outgunned and outfinanced by jihadist groups.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/28/u_s_supports_e_u_easing_of_syria_arms_embargo/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/28/u_s_supports_e_u_easing_of_syria_arms_embargo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hezbollah chief says group is fighting in Syria</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/26/hezbollah_chief_says_group_is_fighting_in_syria/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/26/hezbollah_chief_says_group_is_fighting_in_syria/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 14:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bashar al-Assad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hezbollah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13309583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah's comments marked first public confirmation his men were fighting in Syria]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="yui_3_8_1_22_1369578549170_205"> <p id="yui_3_8_1_22_1369578549170_210">BEIRUT (AP) — The leader of Lebanon's Hezbollah warned Saturday that the fall of Syrian President Bashar Assad's regime would give rise to extremists and plunge the Middle East into a "dark period," and vowed his Shiite militant group will not stand idly by while its chief ally in Damascus is under attack.</p> <p id="yui_3_8_1_22_1369578549170_204">In a televised address, Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah said Hezbollah members are fighting in Syria against Islamic extremists who pose a danger to Lebanon, and pledged that his group will not allow Syrian militants to control areas that border Lebanon.</p> <p id="yui_3_8_1_22_1369578549170_214">Nasrallah's comments marked the first time he has publically confirmed his men were fighting in Syria, and were his first remarks since Hezbollah fighters have become deeply involved in the battle for the strategic Syrian town of Qusair near the Lebanese frontier.</p> <p id="yui_3_8_1_22_1369578549170_218">Hezbollah has come under harsh criticism at home and abroad for sending fighters to Syria to fight along Assad's forces. In his speech, Nasrallah sought to defend the group's deepening involvement, and frame its fight next door as part of a broader battle against Israel.</p> <p>He also portrayed the fight in Syria as an "existential war" for anti-Israel groups including Hezbollah.</p> <p>"Syria is the back of the resistance, and the resistance cannot stand, arms folded while its back is broken," Nasrallah told thousands of supporters from a secret location though a video link.</p> <p>"If Syria falls into the hand of America, Israel and takfiris, the resistance (Hezbollah) will be besieged and Israel will enter Lebanon and impose its will," Nasrallah said. Takfiri Islamists refers to an ideology that urges Sunni Muslims to kill anyone they consider an infidel.</p> <p id="yui_3_8_1_22_1369578549170_216">"If Syria falls in the hands of America, Israel and the takfiris, the people of our region will go into a dark period," he said in a speech to mark the anniversary of Israel's withdrawal from southern Lebanon in May 2000. "If Syria falls, Palestine will be lost."</p> <p>Syria, along with Iran, has been the main backer of Hezbollah and much of the group's arsenal consisting tens of thousands of rockets is believed to have come through or from Syria.</p> <p>More than 70,000 people have been killed and several million displaced since the uprising against Assad erupted in March 2011 and escalated into a civil war. The Syrian government and Hezbollah deny there is an uprising in Syria, portraying the war as a foreign-backed conspiracy driven by Israel, the U.S. and its gulf Arab allies.</p> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/26/hezbollah_chief_says_group_is_fighting_in_syria/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/26/hezbollah_chief_says_group_is_fighting_in_syria/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Brennan makes surprise Israel trip over Syria concerns</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/john_brennan_makes_surprise_israel_trip_over_syria_concerns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/john_brennan_makes_surprise_israel_trip_over_syria_concerns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 15:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Brennan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benjamin Netanyahu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13301454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The CIA chief met with Benjamin Netanyahu following recent Israeli airstrikes outside Demascus]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CIA director John Brennan has made a surprise visit to Israel in the wake of a series of Israeli airstrikes in Syria aimed at weapons stores believed to be Hezbollah-bound. According to Israeli media reports, Brennan met the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Defense Minister Moshe Ya'alon, military Chief of Staff Benny Gantz, and Mossad Chief Tamir Pardo. The visit was read by Israeli commentators as evidence of U.S. concerns about escalating tensions between Israel and Syria. A fullblown conflict between the two nations would risking further embroiling the U.S. in intervention in Syria. The Guardian <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/may/17/cia-chief-israel-syria-visit?guni=Network%20front:network-front%20main-3%20Main%20trailblock:Network%20front%20-%20main%20trailblock:Position1">reported:</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/john_brennan_makes_surprise_israel_trip_over_syria_concerns/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/john_brennan_makes_surprise_israel_trip_over_syria_concerns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>After &#8220;withdrawal&#8221; U.S. will keep 9 Afghan bases</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/after_withdrawal_u_s_will_keep_9_afghan_bases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/after_withdrawal_u_s_will_keep_9_afghan_bases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[troop withdrawal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hamid Karzai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13293864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The continuing presence -- agreed to by President Karzai -- is larger than expected ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The concept of military withdrawal -- especially from Afghanistan -- has long been a flimsy one. Let alone the presence of contractors that are not counted among official troop numbers, withdrawal from Afghanistan has never meant that the country would be totally without a U.S. military presence. On Thursday, Afghan President Hamid Karzai announced that the U.S. hoped to maintain nine military bases across Afghanistan --  a large deployment that stands at odds with claims of a more robust security handover from U.S. to Afghan forces.</p><p>"We can agree to give them the bases – them staying on after 2014 is for the good of Afghanistan," Karzai said in a speech at Kabul University. "The condition is that they bring peace and security and take action quickly … on the basic strengthening of Afghanistan, helping the economy of Afghanistan."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/after_withdrawal_u_s_will_keep_9_afghan_bases/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/after_withdrawal_u_s_will_keep_9_afghan_bases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is revolution coming to the U.S.?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/is_revolution_coming_to_the_u_s/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/is_revolution_coming_to_the_u_s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 15:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cold War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silvio Berlusconi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greece]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austerity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ross Perot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lou Dobbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13291658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They tend to come in waves, triggered by wars and anti-system protests. It can happen here]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will the third revolutionary wave hit the U.S. next? The revolutions in today’s world are getting ever closer to America.</p><p>Revolutions tend to occur in waves, triggered by the aftermath of wars, like the world wars, or by revolutions in leading countries, like the French Revolution and the revolutions of 1848. In the last generation, there have been four regional waves of revolution. With the end of the Cold War, communist regimes were swept from power from Eastern Europe to Central Asia, surviving only in a few countries including China, North Korea and Cuba. Unable to justify themselves with the pretense of fighting communism, military dictatorships were swept away in Latin America. Then the Arab Spring triggered a wave of populist if not necessarily democratic revolutions against autocracies in North Africa and the Middle East.</p><p>Are we seeing a new wave of revolutionary politics in the heartland of the industrial West? Although governments are not being violently overthrown in Europe, political systems are being destabilized by the rise of anti-system movements opposed to the major establishment parties. In Greece, the leftist Syriza party and the far-right Golden Dawn have sapped power from the political center. The most recent Italian election was dominated by anti-system candidates, including Silvio Berlusconi and the comedian Beppe Grillo.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/is_revolution_coming_to_the_u_s/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/is_revolution_coming_to_the_u_s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>139</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Syria crisis triggers diplomacy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/syria_crisis_deepens_as_russia_u_s_hold_talks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/syria_crisis_deepens_as_russia_u_s_hold_talks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemical weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hezbollah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Kerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bashar al-Assad]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13291499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Kerry meets Vladimir Putin to talk political solutions, while it's unclear "red line" for intervention crossed]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Syria's bloody civil war shows no sign of abating, but following two Israeli airstrikes late last week near Damascus aimed at Syrian weapons stockpiles, already fraught questions of international intervention have gained even greater weight and urgency as Assad's regime has called Israeli actions <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2013/05/05/world/meast/syria-violence/index.html">"an act of war." </a>Israel, meanwhile, stressed on Monday that the attacks were not aimed at Syria's beleaguered regime, but were intended solely to stop Iranian-supplied weapons reaching Hezbollah (even though the strikes<a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/10040517/Israels-Damascus-attack-kills-at-least-15-troops-from-Bashar-al-Assads-elite-Republican-Guard.html"> reportedly killed 15 members</a> of Assad's elite Republican guard). The geopolitical fallout is complicated.</p><p><strong>U.S. and Russia meet in an attempt at framing a political solution:</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/syria_crisis_deepens_as_russia_u_s_hold_talks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/syria_crisis_deepens_as_russia_u_s_hold_talks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Syria responds to Israeli air strikes</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/05/syria_responds_to_israeli_air_strikes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/05/syria_responds_to_israeli_air_strikes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2013 19:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Strikes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13290239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The country's government has called the attacks a "flagrant violation of international law"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BEIRUT (AP) -- Israel rushed to beef up its rocket defenses on its northern border Sunday to shield against possible retaliation after carrying out two airstrikes in Syria over 48 hours - an unprecedented escalation of Israeli involvement in the Syrian civil war.</p><p>Syria and its patron Iran hinted at possible retribution, though the rhetoric in official statements appeared relatively muted.</p><p>Despite new concerns about a regional war, Israeli officials signaled they will keep trying to block what they see as an effort by Iran to send sophisticated weapons to Lebanon's Hezbollah militia ahead of a possible collapse of Syrian President Bashar Assad's regime.</p><p>Israel has repeatedly threatened to intervene in the Syrian civil war to stop the transfer of what it calls "game-changing" weapons to Hezbollah, a Syrian-backed group that battled Israel to a stalemate during a monthlong war in 2006.</p><p>Since carrying out a lone airstrike in January that reportedly destroyed a shipment of anti-aircraft missiles headed to Hezbollah, Israel had largely stayed on the sidelines. That changed over the weekend with a pair of airstrikes, including an attack near a sprawling military complex close to the Syrian capital of Damascus early Sunday that set off a series of powerful explosions.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/05/syria_responds_to_israeli_air_strikes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/05/syria_responds_to_israeli_air_strikes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The real reason not to intervene in Syria</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/the_real_reason_not_to_intervene_in_syria/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/the_real_reason_not_to_intervene_in_syria/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 17:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intervention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rwanda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anne-Marie Slaughter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State DEpartment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13288896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not only can outside interference in humanitarian emergencies not help -- it can actually make things worse]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Demands by politicians and pundits for intervention in Syria have become so strong that they now seem to be <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/01/world/middleeast/bomb-in-central-damascus.html?ref=middleeast">influencing U.S. policy</a>. But are they right? The most emotionally powerful arguments came from the State Department former policy planning head Anne-Marie Slaughter. The Obama administration is in danger of letting genocide akin to the one in Rwanda in the 1990s occur, she wrote, in the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/obama-should-remember-rwanda-as-he-weighs-action-in-syria/2013/04/26/08f77c20-ae8a-11e2-8bf6-e70cb6ae066e_story.html">Washington Post</a>. The case of Rwanda haunts Democrats. Former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright called not saving Rwandans her “greatest regret” from her time in office, “something that sits very heavy on all our souls.” U.N. ambassador Susan Rice has similarly expressed agony over U.S. failure to <a href="http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/11/29/rwandan_ghosts">intervene</a> in Rwanda.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/the_real_reason_not_to_intervene_in_syria/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/the_real_reason_not_to_intervene_in_syria/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hagel: Arming Syrian rebels is an option</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/hagel_arming_syrian_rebels_is_an_option/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/hagel_arming_syrian_rebels_is_an_option/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 12:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philip hammond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syrian rebels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bashar al-Assad]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13288590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Defense secretary is first U.S. official to publicly admit considering arming rebels]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel became the first official to publicly confirm that the U.S. is considering arming Syrian rebels. In a Pentagon press conference he said, "Arming the rebels – that's an option. You look at and rethink all options. It doesn't mean you do or you will ... It doesn't mean that the president has decided on anything."</p><p>The New York Times noted that "both his tone and his body language indicated that the assessment process would be careful and deliberate." For some months the Obama administration has called the use of chemical weapons by Assad's regime a "red line" that would prompt military intervention. However, claims that chemical weapons have been used have left Western governments equivocating over action. As<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/may/03/us-reconsiders-arming-syrian-rebels"> the Guardian noted,</a> "On Thursday the British defense secretary, Philip Hammond, said the west would have to wait for any further chemical attacks to be sure of Syrian government involvement, because previously gathered evidence had begun to degrade and could not prove a link."</p><p>Via the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/03/world/middleeast/hagel-confirms-us-is-considering-arming-syrian-rebels.html?_r=0">New York Times:</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/hagel_arming_syrian_rebels_is_an_option/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/hagel_arming_syrian_rebels_is_an_option/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Must-see morning clip: Jon Stewart on Syria&#8217;s chemical weapons</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/must_see_morning_clip_jon_stewart_on_syrias_chemical_weapons/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/must_see_morning_clip_jon_stewart_on_syrias_chemical_weapons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily Show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemical weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must see morning clip]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13286578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does the U.S. really know anything about them?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon Stewart attempts to understand if Syria has crossed the "red line" of consequences for the U.S., but can't seem to get a straight answer:</p><div style="background-color:#000000;width:520px;"> <div style="padding:4px;"><iframe src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/embed/mgid:cms:video:thedailyshow.com:425935" width="512" height="288" frameborder="0"></iframe> <p style="text-align:left;background-color:#FFFFFF;padding:4px;margin-top:4px;margin-bottom:0px;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;"><b><a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/tue-april-30-2013/whose-line-is-it-anyway-">The Daily Show with Jon Stewart</a></b><br/>Get More: <a href='http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/'>Daily Show Full Episodes</a>,<a href='http://www.comedycentral.com/indecision'>Indecision Political Humor</a>,<a href='http://www.facebook.com/thedailyshow'>The Daily Show on Facebook</a></p> </div> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/must_see_morning_clip_jon_stewart_on_syrias_chemical_weapons/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/must_see_morning_clip_jon_stewart_on_syrias_chemical_weapons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The world is actually more peaceful than ever</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/the_world_is_actually_safer_than_ever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/the_world_is_actually_safer_than_ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cold War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World War II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osama Bin Laden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[al qaeda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saddam Hussein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kuwait]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13278994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the aftermath of an awful tragedy, it's hard to remember that political violence is in fact diminishing greatly]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the aftermath of the Boston Marathon bombings, it is important to keep things in perspective, by emphasizing what the mass media tend to neglect — namely, the fact that the world has become much more peaceful in recent decades and is getting more peaceful all the time.</p><p>It does not diminish the horror of mass casualty attacks on civilians, in this and other countries, to point out that today’s terrorist incidents provide a counterpoint to a declining arc of political violence worldwide. Both violence among states and violence within states have diminished dramatically in the last few generations.</p><p>If we look at battle deaths in the last century, the spurts in the Cold War, associated with the Korean, Indochina and Soviet-Afghan wars, were dwarfed by the huge spikes of slaughter associated with the world wars. And with the end of the Cold War came a steep decline in political violence worldwide — mainly because the two sides no longer kept local conflicts going by arming and supplying opposing sides from Latin America to Africa to Asia and the Middle East.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/the_world_is_actually_safer_than_ever/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/the_world_is_actually_safer_than_ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Syrian government resists chemical weapons probe</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/syrian_government_resists_chemical_weapons_probe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/syrian_government_resists_chemical_weapons_probe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 11:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemical weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.N.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bashar al-Assad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aleppo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13265612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.N. has asked for full cooperation with chemical weapons investigation after accusations from rebels and regime]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both Syrian rebels and the government have accused each other of using chemical weapons, prompting international ire -- the use of chemical weapons by the Assad regime has long been a<a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/has_syria_crossed_the_chemical_weapon_red_line/"> purported "red line"</a> for U.S. intervention in the civil war. However, as the Guardian reports Tuesday, the Syrian government is resisting full cooperation with a United Nations probe into the alleged use of chemical weapons in Aleppo:</p><blockquote><p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/apr/09/syria-rejects-extended-chemical-weapons-probe-live?fb=native&amp;commentpage=1#block-5163d070b5796d4b2d63dbda">The Syrian government claims that the UN has attempted to widen the remit of its mission</a>, which it says was originally intended to investigate an alleged chemical weapons attack in Khan al-Assal in Aleppo last month. It says the UN now wants "additional investigations which might allow the UN mission to spread all over the Syrian territories, and this contradicts the Syrian request from the UN and indicates to the presence of hidden intentions at the states which have sought to add those investigations as this constitutes a violation of the Syrian sovereignty".</p> <p>Syrian state media reported that the government would not allow such "manoeuvres" but would still allow the mission to visit Khan al-Assal in keeping with its original intention</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/syrian_government_resists_chemical_weapons_probe/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/syrian_government_resists_chemical_weapons_probe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CIA helps airlift arms to Syrian rebels</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/cia_helps_airlift_arms_to_syrian_rebels/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/cia_helps_airlift_arms_to_syrian_rebels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 14:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syrian rebels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bashar al-Assad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arms shipments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13251072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A program airlifting military aid from Turkey and Arab states has sharply increased]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/25/world/middleeast/arms-airlift-to-syrian-rebels-expands-with-cia-aid.html">New York Times Sunday</a>, the CIA is increasing its aid to the airlift program supplying Syrian rebels with weapons and equipment from Turkey and a number of Arab governments.</p><p>The Times reported that the airlifts, which began in early 2012, now include more than 160 military cargo flights by Jordanian, Saudi and Qatari military-style cargo planes landing at Esenboga Airport near Ankara, as well as at other Jordanian and Turkish airports. An estimated 3,500 tons of equipment have been delivered through these flights. The Times noted too that U.S. intelligence officers check up on rebel groups and chiefs to determine who should receive the military aid and that Turkey oversaw much of the program.</p><p>Via the Times:</p><blockquote><p>[E]ven as the Obama administration has publicly refused to give more than “nonlethal” aid to the rebels, the involvement of the C.I.A. in the arms shipments — albeit mostly in a consultative role, American officials say — has shown that the United States is more willing to help its Arab allies support the lethal side of the civil war.</p></blockquote><p>The inclusion of the term "mostly" in the above paragraph is interesting and raises questions about the small role the CIA is playing outside of consultations.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/cia_helps_airlift_arms_to_syrian_rebels/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/cia_helps_airlift_arms_to_syrian_rebels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>