<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Military contractors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/military_contractors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Lockheed Martin goes to bat for oppressive regime</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/04/lockheed_martin_goes_to_bat_for_oppressive_regime/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/04/lockheed_martin_goes_to_bat_for_oppressive_regime/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bahrain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lobbying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lobbyists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military contractors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=11796491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A top executive for the military contractor worked with lobbyists for Bahrain to publish Op-Ed defending the regime]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A top executive at Lockheed Martin recently worked with lobbyists for Bahrain to place an Op-Ed defending the nation's embattled regime in the Washington Times -- but the newspaper did not reveal the role of the regime's lobbyists to its readers. Hence they did not know that the pro-Bahrain opinion column they were reading was published at the behest of ... Bahrain, an oil-rich kingdom of 1.2 million people that has been rocked by popular protests since early 2011.</p><p>The episode is a glimpse into the usually hidden world of how Washington's Op-Ed pages, which are prized real estate for those with interests before the U.S. government, are shaped. It also shows how Lockheed gave an assist to a major client -- Bahrain has bought hundreds of millions of dollars of weapons from the company over the years – as it faces widespread criticism for human rights abuses against pro-democracy protesters.</p><p>As Ken Silverstein reported in Salon <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/08/how_bahrain_works_washington/">last month,</a> the kingdom is stepping up its Washington lobbying efforts. Here's the latest example, as far as I can piece together from lobbying disclosures filed by Bahrain's "strategic communications" <a href="http://sanitasint.com/en/content/1/homepage/">firm</a>, D.C.-based Sanitas International.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/04/lockheed_martin_goes_to_bat_for_oppressive_regime/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/04/lockheed_martin_goes_to_bat_for_oppressive_regime/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Armed Forces, military contractors, right-wing hacks all agree: Never cut defense spending</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/31/armed_forces_military_contractors_right_wing_hacks_all_agree_never_cut_defense_spending/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/31/armed_forces_military_contractors_right_wing_hacks_all_agree_never_cut_defense_spending/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lobbyists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10159866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite DC consensus on the importance of "tackling the deficit," no one wants to touch the guns and bombs budget]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here's a short list of things that most of the Washington establishment agrees on: The federal budget deficit is the single most pressing issue facing the nation today and also our military must always be powerful enough to face any conceivable present or future threat. When those principles come into opposition, regular people usually lose, because they are not cool stealth fighter planes.</p><p>Wired's Spencer Ackerman <a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/10/army-future-unified-quest/">reports from the Army's "Unified Quest" event</a>, in which the Army "holds a series of wargames and symposia to help it think about its needs for the near future." Its needs generally include funding that matches or exceeds current levels.</p><p>We are, of course, currently drawing down from one of the multiple wars we're fighting, making it harder to justify maintaining such a large Army, but the Army is basically convinced that the world is heading for <a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/10/army-future-unified-quest/">a disastrous post-apocalyptic hellscape scenario:</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/31/armed_forces_military_contractors_right_wing_hacks_all_agree_never_cut_defense_spending/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/31/armed_forces_military_contractors_right_wing_hacks_all_agree_never_cut_defense_spending/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Air Force gives Lockheed Martin millions to fix busted Lockheed Martin plane</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/27/air_force_gives_lockheed_martin_millions_to_fix_busted_lockheed_martin_plane/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/27/air_force_gives_lockheed_martin_millions_to_fix_busted_lockheed_martin_plane/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 17:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lockheed Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10150141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The F-22 Raptor, the world's coolest and most pointless fighter, keeps trying to asphyxiate its pilots]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know how if you buy something that's really expensive and it turns out that it's broken you ask the company that made the thing to fix it, for free, under some sort of "warranty"? That is not how things work in defense contracting. The Air Force <a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/10/lockheed-oxygen/">is giving Lockheed Martin $24 million</a> to figure out why pilots keep passing out from lack of oxygen while flying in Lockheed Martin's F-22 Raptors, the most expensive fighters ever built.</p><p>Wired's Danger Room <a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/10/lockheed-oxygen/">reports</a>:</p><blockquote><p>On no fewer than 20 occasions since 2008, Raptor pilots have reported mid-air black-outs, disorientation and other symptoms of oxygen deprivation — a.k.a., “hypoxia” — possibly related to the stealth fighter’s On-Board Oxygen Generation System, built by Honeywell.</p></blockquote><p>Haha, whoops. Well, when you're only able to spend $66.7 billion on a fleet of supermaneuverable stealth fighter aircraft, these things will happen.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/27/air_force_gives_lockheed_martin_millions_to_fix_busted_lockheed_martin_plane/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/27/air_force_gives_lockheed_martin_millions_to_fix_busted_lockheed_martin_plane/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lockheed Martin hit by cyber attack</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/29/bc_us_lockheed_martin_cyber_attack_1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/29/bc_us_lockheed_martin_cyber_attack_1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2011 15:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/05/29/bc_us_lockheed_martin_cyber_attack_1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The defense contractor fended off a major security breach last week]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hackers launched a "significant and tenacious" cyber attack on Lockheed Martin, a major defense contractor holding highly sensitive information, but its secrets remained safe, the company said Saturday.</p><p>Lockheed Martin, the Department of Homeland Security and the Pentagon confirmed that the contractor's information systems had come under attack. Lt. Col. April Cunningham, speaking for the Defense Department, said the impact on the Pentagon "is minimal and we don't expect any adverse effect."</p><p>Still, the concerted attempt to breach the contractor's systems underscored the risk to the nation's critical defense data. Chris Ortman, Homeland Security spokesman, said his agency and the Pentagon were working with the company to determine the breadth of the attack and "provide recommendations to mitigate further risk."</p><p>Lockheed Martin said in a statement that it detected the May 21 attack "almost immediately" and took countermeasures. As a result, "our systems remain secure; no customer, program or employee personal data has been compromised." The company's security team is still working to restore employee access to the targeted network. Neither Lockheed Martin nor the federal agencies revealed specifics of the attack.</p><p>
    <em>AP writer Jennifer Malloy contributed to this report from Los Angeles.</em>
  </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/29/bc_us_lockheed_martin_cyber_attack_1/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/29/bc_us_lockheed_martin_cyber_attack_1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The high cost of cheap war</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/06/high_cost_cheap_war/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/06/high_cost_cheap_war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/05/06/high_cost_cheap_war</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The use of drones and non-government contractors makes resorting to military action much too easy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems only fitting that in the very month the "Terminator" sci-fi franchise predicted the rise of militarized artificial intelligence, the Guardian of London reported on a British Ministry of Defence analysis warning that drone warfare may be creating an "incremental and involuntary journey towards a Terminator-like reality." The report's life-imitating-Skynet idea of robots ultimately making combat decisions is certainly scary -- but still a bit fantastical. The more frightening part of the analysis was its look at how roboticized war may already be prompting governments to "resort to war as a policy option far sooner than previously."</p><p>The dynamic is not surprising -- nations will inevitably be more willing to use warfare as a foreign policy tool if they possess instruments limiting the cost of waging war. By letting kids in Las Vegas drop remote-controlled bombs on kids in Pakistan, Yemen and now Libya, drones are one of those instruments. But they are only one of many. Indeed, while President Obama preposterously claimed this week that most Americans "know well the costs of war," it's quite the opposite: Most Americans have been insulated from those costs -- and it's no coincidence that as we've become more insulated, we've happily waged more frequent wars.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/06/high_cost_cheap_war/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/06/high_cost_cheap_war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Lockheed Martin shadowing you?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/11/lockheed_martin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/11/lockheed_martin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 21:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/01/11/lockheed_martin</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How a giant weapons maker became the new Big Brother]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
    <img class='wp-image-10012660' src='http://media.salon.com/2011/01/uss_freedom.jpg' />
  </p><p>
    <em>This piece originally appeared on <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/">TomDispatch.</a></em>
  </p><p>&#160;</p><p>Have you noticed that Lockheed Martin, the giant weapons corporation, is shadowing you? No? Then you haven't been paying much attention. Let me put it this way: If you have a life, Lockheed Martin is likely a part of it.</p><p>True, Lockheed Martin doesn't actually <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/28/business/yourmoney/28lock.html">run</a> the U.S. government, but sometimes it seems as if it might as well. After all, it <a href="http://www.fedspending.org/fpds/fpds.php?reptype=r&amp;detail=-1&amp;sortp=f&amp;datype=T&amp;reptype=r&amp;database=fpds&amp;database=fpds&amp;parent_id=209295&amp;fiscal_year=2008&amp;record_num=f500">received</a> $36 billion in government contracts in 2008 alone, more than any company in history. It now does work for <a href="http://www.fedspending.org/fpds/fpds.php?reptype=r&amp;detail=-1&amp;sortp=f&amp;datype=T&amp;reptype=r&amp;database=fpds&amp;database=fpds&amp;parent_id=209295&amp;fiscal_year=2008&amp;record_num=f500&amp;sum_expand=A">more than two dozen</a> government agencies from the Department of Defense and the Department of Energy to the Department of Agriculture and the Environmental Protection Agency. It's involved in surveillance and information processing for the CIA, the FBI, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), the National Security Agency (NSA), the Pentagon, the Census Bureau, and the Postal Service.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/11/lockheed_martin/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/11/lockheed_martin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Mitch McConnell is worse than Charles Rangel</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/17/mcconnell_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/17/mcconnell_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 00:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Rangel, D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toyota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joe_conason//2010/11/16/mcconnell</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Both men misused their power -- but the Senate leader gave corrupt BAE Systems $17 million in 2010 earmarks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the same day that the House Ethics Committee convicted Rep. Charles Rangel of nearly a dozen violations of congressional rules, Sen. Mitch McConnell announced that under pressure from fellow Republicans, he will surrender his beloved earmarks. This is a notable coincidence because, like Rangel, McConnell has rewarded corporate donors to an academic center named after him -- and used earmarks for that purpose. The top corporate recipient of earmarks from the Kentucky Republican in the 2010 budget not only happens to be a donor to the <a href="http://louisville.edu/mcconnellcenter/">McConnell Center for Political Leadership</a> at the University of Louisville, but one of the largest and most corrupt defense contractors in the world.</p><p>Topping the list of Rangel's transgressions was the misuse of his congressional clout to raise money for a vanity academic "center" named after him at the City University of New York from private donors. Yet somehow McConnell got away with the same kind of dubious dealings at the University of Louisville -- and was allowed to reward BAE Systems, donor of $500,000 to the McConnell Center, with <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/earmarks.php?cid=n00003389">$17 million worth of defense earmarks.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/17/mcconnell_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/17/mcconnell_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: Massive flaws in Kabul embassy security</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/28/armorgroup_misconduct_kabul_embassy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/28/armorgroup_misconduct_kabul_embassy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/10/28/armorgroup_misconduct_kabul_embassy</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meet the untrained, unvetted, non-English speaking Nepalese contractors guarding the U.S. embassy in Kabul]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As President Obama's war in Afghanistan continues to <em>not</em> be an issue in the midterm elections, the latest reminder of the grim situation over there comes in the form of a blistering State Department Inspector General report on the private security contractors at the Kabul embassy.</p><p>It was contractors with the company ArmorGroup, remember, who were <a href="http://motherjones.com/mojo/2009/09/animal-house-afghanistan">accused</a> in 2009 of maintaining a "Lord of the Flies environment" at the embassy (there was also the now famous picture of a vodka butt-shot. ArmorGroup, which is owned by UK-based private security giant <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G4S">G4S</a>, is the subject of the just-released 50-page State Department IG <a href="http://oig.state.gov/documents/organization/150316.pdf">report</a>.&#160;</p><p>From the report's key findings:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/28/armorgroup_misconduct_kabul_embassy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/28/armorgroup_misconduct_kabul_embassy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Former Marine pleads guilty to accepting bribes</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/05/marine_bribery/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/05/marine_bribery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 22:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/10/05/marine_bribery</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mariam Mendoza Steinbuch received $25,000 in exchange for awarding contracts to a Lebanese-based company]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A former Marine has pleaded guilty to accepting a $25,000 bribe in exchange for awarding numerous contracts to a Lebanese-based company at Camp Falluja in Iraq.</p><p>Mariam Mendoza Steinbuch, who was a staff sergeant deployed as a contracting specialist in 2006, was arraigned Tuesday in federal court in Washington.</p><p>Court documents say that after Mendoza returned to the United States in February 2007, she flew from San Diego to Houston Hobby Airport and picked up $25,000 cash from an official with a Houston-based affiliate of the company.</p><p>Court filings do not disclose the name of the company or the value of the contracts it was awarded in the scheme.</p><p>The documents say Mendoza must turn over two all-terrain vehicles she bought with the bribe money.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/05/marine_bribery/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/05/marine_bribery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>6 injured in explosion at Tennessee factory</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/14/flare_plant_explosion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/14/flare_plant_explosion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 19:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military contractors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/09/14/flare_plant_explosion</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Three are in critical condition after blast and flash fire ravage plant that makes flares for the military]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An explosion and flash fire Tuesday at a plant that makes flares for the military injured six people, three of them critically, authorities said.</p><p>The explosion at Kilgore Flares Co. was reported just before noon, said Cris Hill, a dispatcher at the Hardeman County sheriff's office.</p><p>A Memphis hospital reported that three people were brought there in critical condition and a smaller hospital in Bolivar reported that three people there were in good condition.</p><p>County Mayor Willie Spencer, who was at the scene, said the fire apparently was contained to one building, which was heavily damaged.</p><p>"It could have been a lot worse," he said. "Any time you have an explosion ... you never know how many people are around."</p><p>As for the cause, Spencer said, "I don't think they have a clue."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/09/14/flare_plant_explosion/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/14/flare_plant_explosion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S.A to end Iraq combat operations</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/08/us_us_iraq_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/08/us_us_iraq_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 15:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan War Logs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military Suicides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/08/08/us_us_iraq_2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[General Ray Odierno believes the Iraqi military ready in the wake of American troop withdrawal]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iraq's military is ready and able to take over security operations as the United States ends it combat role and prepares for a major troop withdrawal, the commander of U.S. forces in Iraq said Sunday.</p><p>Gen. Ray Odierno said Iraq's military has "stepped up" to the challenge even as Iraqi politicians continue to squabble over the formation of a new government and new incidents of extremist violence are reported.</p><p>"We do believe they are ready to assume full operations in Iraq," Odierno said on ABC's "This Week." He praised the Iraqi security forces for their professionalism and neutrality during the months of political uncertainty that followed elections earlier this year.</p><p>Odierno added, however, that it is critical for Iraq to form a government after five months of delay, warning that insurgents will try to take advantage of the political vacuum.</p><p>"The Iraqis have to understand the importance of forming the government," he said.</p><p>Violence has dropped dramatically in Iraq since 2008, but insurgent attacks remain a daily occurrence, especially in the capital Baghdad, preventing the city from regaining a semblance of normalcy seven years after the insurgency broke out.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/08/08/us_us_iraq_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/08/us_us_iraq_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Injured abroad, neglected at home</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/17/contractors_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/17/contractors_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military contractors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2009/12/17/contractors</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Investigation: Civilian workers fight losing battle against insurers -- with little government support]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In her first public address after taking office, Labor Secretary Hilda Solis promised to increase enforcement of laws designed to protect workers.</p><p>"You can rest assured that there is a new sheriff in town," she told union members at a gathering in Miami Beach shortly after her confirmation in February.</p><p>Ten months later, Solis' Labor Department has failed to crack down on one of the agency's fastest growing and most expensive programs, a system designed to ensure medical care for civilian workers injured in war zones.</p><p>The department is responsible for overseeing a workers' compensation system in which insurance carriers provide coverage to civilians working on overseas federal contracts -- a group estimated to <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/15/AR2009121504850.html?hpid=topnews">grow rapidly</a> as the Obama administration deepens U.S. involvement in Afghanistan. Such policies are funded by taxpayers.</p><p>But the department has failed to pursue sanctions against corporations accused of ignoring federal requirements to purchase such insurance, according to a ProPublica review of court cases, federal records and interviews with worker advocates.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/12/17/contractors_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/17/contractors_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The dark truth about Blackwater</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/10/02/blackwater_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/10/02/blackwater_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 11:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abu Ghraib]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blackwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/10/02/blackwater</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Outsourcing the war to private military contractors such as Blackwater has shattered the United States' moral authority and its ability to win wars like that in Iraq.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> On Sept. 16, 2007, a convoy of Blackwater contractors guarding State Department employees entered a crowded square near the Mansour district in Baghdad, Iraq. But versions of what caused the ensuing bloodshed diverge. Employees from the firm claim they were attacked by gunmen and responded within the rules of engagement, fighting their way out of the square after one of their vehicles was disabled. Iraqi police and witnesses instead report that the contractors opened fire first, shooting at a small car driven by a couple with their child that did not get out of the convoy's way as traffic slowed. At some point in the 20-minute gunfight, Iraqi police and army forces stationed in watchtowers above the square also began firing. Other Iraqi security forces and Blackwater quick-reaction forces soon reportedly joined the battle. There are also reports that one Blackwater employee may even have pointed his weapon at his fellow contractors, in an effort to get them to cease firing. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/10/02/blackwater_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/10/02/blackwater_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>George Tenet cashes in on Iraq</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/05/07/tenet_money/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/05/07/tenet_money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 12:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/05/07/tenet_money</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former CIA chief is earning big money from corporations profiting  off the war -- a fact not mentioned in his combative new book or  heard on his publicity blitz.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> If you go by the book jacket of his new memoir, "At the Center of the Storm," <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/george_tenet">George Tenet</a> is enjoying the life of a retired government servant teaching at Georgetown University, where he was appointed to the faculty in 2004. The former CIA director played up the academic image when he kicked off the recent media blitz for his new book by doing an interview for CBS's "60 Minutes" from his spacious, book-lined office at the university. His academic salary, and the reported $4 million advance he received from publisher HarperCollins, should provide the former CIA director with more than enough money to live comfortably for the rest of his days and leave a substantial fortune to his children. </p><p> But those monies are hardly Tenet's entire income. While the swirl of publicity around his book has focused on his long debated role in allowing flawed intelligence to launch the war in <a href=http://dir.salon.com/topics/iraq>Iraq,</a> nobody is talking about his lucrative connection to that conflict ever since he <a href="http://dir.salon.com/story/news/feature/2004/06/04/tenet/index.html">resigned from the CIA</a> in June 2004. In fact, Tenet has been earning substantial income by working for corporations that provide the U.S. government with technology, equipment and personnel used for the war in Iraq as well as the broader war on terror. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/05/07/tenet_money/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/05/07/tenet_money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No justice for all</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/04/14/contractor_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/04/14/contractor_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 12:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abu Ghraib]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2006/04/14/contractor</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Army investigators found "probable cause" that a civilian interrogator abused a detainee at Abu Ghraib. Why has the Department of Justice failed to prosecute him -- or any of the other 18 civilians suspected of criminal acts?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Salon has obtained a previously unpublished 2003 Abu Ghraib photograph that shows Daniel Johnson, a civilian contractor, interrogating an Iraqi prisoner using what an Army investigation calls "an unauthorized stress position." </p><p>The Army investigated the circumstances behind the photograph, found "probable cause" that a crime had been committed, and referred the case to the Justice Department for prosecution. (Salon obtained the photo from someone who spent time at Abu Ghraib as a uniformed member of the military and is familiar with the Army investigation there.) But in early 2005, a Department of Justice attorney told the Army that the evidence in the case did not justify prosecution. </p><p>This failure to act by the Justice Department, which has sole jurisdiction over crimes committed by civilian contractors in Iraq, has prompted a Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee and human-rights organizations to question the seriousness with which the Bush administration is pursuing prisoner-abuse cases. At his January 2005 confirmation hearing, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales declared, "Abuse will not be tolerated by this administration. If confirmed, I will ensure that the Department of Justice aggressively pursues those responsible for such abhorrent actions." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/04/14/contractor_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/04/14/contractor_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Big Steve&#8221; and Abu Ghraib</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/03/31/big_steve/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/03/31/big_steve/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 12:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abu Ghraib]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2006/03/31/big_steve</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Salon has uncovered more allegations against a civilian interrogator accused of abuse at the prison. Why has he never been prosecuted?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> The man known as "Big Steve" did not attend the court-martial this month of Sgt. Michael J. Smith, an Army dog handler at Abu Ghraib. But no one could miss his looming presence in the courtroom. According to both the prosecution and defense, "Big Steve" was deeply involved in the abuse committed by Smith, who was convicted March 21 for using his dog to terrify prisoners. </p><p> "Big Steve," whose real name is Steven Anthony Stefanowicz, worked as an interrogator for military intelligence at Abu Ghraib. But he was no ordinary soldier. Stefanowicz was one of dozens of civilian employees from Virginia contractor CACI International hired by the Pentagon to work at the prison. </p><p> According to a military policeman who testified at the court-martial, Stefanowicz directed the abuse in one of the most infamous incidents captured on camera at Abu Ghraib: A prisoner in an orange jumpsuit being <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/abu_ghraib/2006/03/14/chapter_8/46.html" target="_blank">menaced with an unmuzzled dog.</a> </p><p> "I was told by his interrogator, Big Steve, that he was al-Qaida," testified Pvt. Ivan Frederick II. "He said, 'Any chance you get, put the dogs on.'" </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/03/31/big_steve/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/03/31/big_steve/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

