<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Mitch McConnell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/mitch_mcconnell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 19:29:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>McConnell responds to Obama&#8217;s drink joke with Clint Eastwood joke</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/mcconnell_responds_to_obamas_drink_joke_with_clint_eastwood_joke/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/mcconnell_responds_to_obamas_drink_joke_with_clint_eastwood_joke/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House Correspondents' Dinner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13284932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[McConnell's campaign tweeted a picture of the senator drinking with an empty chair]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell responded to a crack President Obama made about him at the White House Correspondents' Dinner with a reference to Clint Eastwood's empty chair bit at the Republican National Convention.</p><p>Obama had <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/watch_obama_and_conans_speeches_at_the_correspondents_dinner/">joked</a> that people complain that he doesn't reach across the aisle enough. "'Why don't you get a drink with Mitch McConnell?' they ask," Obama said. "Really? Why don't <em>you</em> get a drink with Mitch McConnell?"</p><p>McConnell responded during an appearance before the Southeast Kentucky Chamber of Commerce, the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/04/29/mcconnell-jokes-about-his-soft-side-in-response-to-obama/">Washington Post</a> reports, saying: “I’m shocked. He’s obviously not seeing my soft side.”</p><p>His campaign Twitter account also <a href="http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/mcconnell-responds-to-obamas-whcd-joke-about-having">tweeted</a> a picture of McConnell drinking with an empty chair, also looping in <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/30/clint_eastwood_steals_the_rnc/">Clint Eastwood</a>:</p><p>[embedtweet id="328939838835392513"]</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/mcconnell_responds_to_obamas_drink_joke_with_clint_eastwood_joke/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/mcconnell_responds_to_obamas_drink_joke_with_clint_eastwood_joke/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McConnell ad links &#8220;dirty&#8221; Progress Kentucky to Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/mcconnell_ad_links_dirty_progress_kentucky_to_obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/mcconnell_ad_links_dirty_progress_kentucky_to_obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 16:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progress Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mother Jones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13275161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["How dirty will Obama's allies get?" the ad asks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an new ad, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell links Progress Kentucky, the liberal Super PAC <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/progress_kentucky_worst_super_pac_ever/">accused</a> of making secret recordings of a McConnell campaign meeting, to President Obama, asking how "dirty" his allies will get in the race.</p><p>"Mitch McConnell is Obama's No. 1 target because Mitch protects Kentucky from Obama's bad ideas," the ad says. "Liberals will do anything to beat McConnell. They also launched racial attacks against Mitch's wife. And now liberals compare Mitch to al Qaeda terrorists and North Korea's dictator. How dirty will Obama's allies get?"</p><p>Watch:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/tjpmwxc41Bw" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/mcconnell_ad_links_dirty_progress_kentucky_to_obama/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/mcconnell_ad_links_dirty_progress_kentucky_to_obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>James O&#8217;Keefe defends David Corn on McConnell recordings</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/james_okeefe_defends_david_corn_on_mcconnell_recordings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/james_okeefe_defends_david_corn_on_mcconnell_recordings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 16:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James O'Keefe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Corn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progress Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13271117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[O'Keefe writes that he "shares David Corn’s vision of bringing veritas to the vulgate"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mother Jones' David Corn has an unlikely defender in the case of the secret Mitch McConnell recordings: Conservative gadfly James O'Keefe.</p><p>In a blog post for <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/04/15/james-o-keefe-in-defense-of-taping-mitch-mcconnell-and-everyone-else.html">the Daily Beast</a> called  "James O’Keefe in Defense of Taping Mitch McConnell, and Everyone Else," O'Keefe writes that he "shares David Corn’s vision of bringing <em>veritas</em> to the vulgate, or truth to the people," and says that "I’ve become all too familiar with civil and criminal statutes that are bad for democracy because they insolate those vested in a public trust from democratic accountability."</p><p>From the post:</p><blockquote><p>While the two young people who allegedly recorded McConnell, Shawn Reilly and Curtis Morrison, may have overstepped the line this time, conservatives need to understand that the potential punishment they face is incommensurate with the crime under the present law. Raw and unfiltered recordings are the best tools we have to expose things as they really are. Last year John Fund referred to our video showing Eric Holder’s ballot to vote offered to a stranger as “cinema verité.” Now David Corn said of his McConnell tape, “No one needs to listen to me or any commentator to know what it means ... It’s all there ... It’s journalism verité.” As someone who shares David Corn’s vision of bringing <em>veritas</em> to the vulgate, or truth to the people, I wholeheartedly agree.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/james_okeefe_defends_david_corn_on_mcconnell_recordings/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/james_okeefe_defends_david_corn_on_mcconnell_recordings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fighting for political life, Mitch has LaPierre&#8217;s back</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/mitchs_eyes_are_on_2014/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/mitchs_eyes_are_on_2014/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13270817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He'll do anything to avoid or win a primary, which means sabotaging gun control, plus other confusing moves]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I owe Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell a minor apology. I said <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/the_liberal_medias_gift_to_mitch_mcconnell/">he was being very silly</a> when he demanded an FBI investigation into the recording of a meeting at his campaign office. In fact, the meeting actually <em>was</em> surreptitiously recorded by his political enemies, or at least by a guy who operates a useless "super PAC" that has, thus far, spent <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/13/progress-kentucky_n_3076133.html">a total of $18 on defeating McConnell.</a> McConnell probably didn't lose much sleep awaiting my apology, though, because the recording, and the news of its provenance, are just about the best things that have happened to the guy since <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2013/03/12/174145227/labor-relations-board-will-take-recess-appointment-decision-to-supreme-court">the D.C. circuit court gave McConnell veto power</a> over all of President Obama's appointments.</p><p>McConnell's very good week might not end up meaning very much, though, if the United States Senate manages, somehow, to pass major legislation on gun control and immigration any time soon. Because whenever the United States Senate manages to accomplish anything, conservatives get very irate with Mitch McConnell for allowing it to happen.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/mitchs_eyes_are_on_2014/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/mitchs_eyes_are_on_2014/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Progress Kentucky: Worst super PAC ever?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/progress_kentucky_worst_super_pac_ever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/progress_kentucky_worst_super_pac_ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 22:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super PACs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progress Kentucky]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13268462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even before the last two scandals, Kentucky liberals called the group an "embarrassment"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liberal super PAC Progress Kentucky is at the center of controversy after a Democratic strategist in the state said activists affiliated with the group bragged to him that they secretly recorded the audiotape of Mitch McConnell's strategy meeting that was leaked to Mother Jones this week. If true, they could face criminal sanctions. The treasurer of the super PAC <a href="http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/04/11/17708661-liberal-ky-group-spotlighted-in-mcconnell-audio-probe?lite">resigned</a> this afternoon.</p><p>Now, it's worth stating that we don't know for sure that Progress Kentucky produced the tape or is involved in any way -- this is just the word of one Democratic strategist, who has <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/11/progress-kentucky-mcconnell_n_3064265.html">an interest</a> in distancing his party from the group.</p><p>But it's not the first time the super PAC has gotten into trouble. In late February, they <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/26/kentucky_pac_slurs_mcconnell_family/">made a series of offensive "jokes"</a> about McConnell's wife on Twitter, attacking her for being Chinese-American. Even Ashley Judd felt compelled to issue a <a href="https://twitter.com/AshleyJudd/status/306515894295724033">public condemnation</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/progress_kentucky_worst_super_pac_ever/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/progress_kentucky_worst_super_pac_ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: Progressive group taped McConnell</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/report_progressive_group_taped_mcconnell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/report_progressive_group_taped_mcconnell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recording]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mother Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13268138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a Democratic Party official in Kentucky]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this week Mother Jones <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/04/mitch-mcconnell-ashley-judd-secret-tape-senate">released audio</a> of Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell discussing strategy for a possible campaign against Ashley Judd.  McConnell's office responded by asking the FBI to investigate. Now it looks like the mystery might be solved. Jacob Conway, a Democratic Party official, told <a href="http://wfpl.org/post/source-progress-kentucky-behind-mitch-mcconnell-campaign-recording">a Louisville NPR station</a> that Progress Kentucky, a liberal group with a <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/26/progress-kentucky-mitch-mcconnell-wife_n_2767404.html">history of tangling with McConnell</a>, made the tape, without permission from the party:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/report_progressive_group_taped_mcconnell/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/report_progressive_group_taped_mcconnell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The liberal media&#8217;s gift to Mitch McConnell</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/the_liberal_medias_gift_to_mitch_mcconnell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/the_liberal_medias_gift_to_mitch_mcconnell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ashley Judd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mother Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative movement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13266458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The unloved Senate minority leader is exploiting that Ashley Judd meeting leak to get a bit of conservative love]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After a recording of an opposition research strategy meeting <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2013/04/mcconnell-use-senate-employees-research-political-attacks-ashley-judd">was leaked to Mother Jones</a>, Mitch McConnell is demanding that the <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/04/09/mcconnell-mother-jones-tape-ashley-judd/2066725/">FBI investigate</a> the bugging of his office <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2013/04/mcconnell-accuses-political-left-bugging-his-office.php">by the "political left."</a> This is silly. McConnell knows it's silly. The meeting was almost certainly <a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2013/04/mitch-mcconnell-office-bugged/64059/">recorded by an attendee</a>, not by "bugs" planted by liberal spies.</p><p>But the point isn't really to catch the perpetrator. The point is <a href="http://teammitch.com/wiretap/?src=twitter">this ridiculous splash on his campaign website,</a> in which visitors are told that McConnell's office was "wiretapped" by "liberals" and are encouraged to respond by sending all of their contact information, along with some money, to Mitch McConnell's reelection campaign.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/the_liberal_medias_gift_to_mitch_mcconnell/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/the_liberal_medias_gift_to_mitch_mcconnell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Congress nears deal on background checks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/congress_nears_deal_on_background_checks_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/congress_nears_deal_on_background_checks_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Schumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[background checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13266674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The bipartisan agreement could build support for Obama's latest push to curb gun violence]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — A bipartisan deal seems imminent on expanding background checks to more gun buyers, an agreement that could build support for President Barack Obama's drive to curb firearms violence.</p><p>Meanwhile, the Senate is ready for an opening vote on restricting guns as Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., set a roll call for Thursday on starting consideration of the firearms legislation. Odds are growing that Democrats will win enough Republican support to thwart an effort by conservatives and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., to block consideration from even starting.</p><p>"I hope Republicans will stop trying to shut down debate and start engaging in the tough issues we were sent to Washington to tackle," Reid said.</p><p>Together, the developments were a boost for gun control advocates battling for restrictions in the wake of December's shootings that killed 20 first-graders and six staffers at an elementary school in Newtown, Conn.</p><p>Even so, the ultimate fate of gun legislation remains unclear, clouded by opposition from many Republicans and moderate Democrats in the Democratic-led Senate and the Republican-run House. Many critics say the proposal would violate the Second Amendment right to bear arms and burden law-abiding gun owners.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/congress_nears_deal_on_background_checks_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/congress_nears_deal_on_background_checks_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dems appear to have the votes to break gun control filibuster</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/dems_appear_to_have_the_votes_to_break_gun_control_filibuster/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/dems_appear_to_have_the_votes_to_break_gun_control_filibuster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 20:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Manchin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal background checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Filibuster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saxby Chambliss]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13266053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A preliminary vote on the legislation will take place on Thursday, Majority Leader Harry Reid announced]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Senate will hold a preliminary vote on gun control legislation to break the Republican filibuster on Thursday, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid <a href="http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/reid-schedules-preliminary-gun-vote-for-thursday">announced</a>, after the Democrats pulled together enough votes from Republicans.</p><p>"We're going to vote Thursday," Reid said. "I'm going to file cloture on the bill tonight."</p><p>Though Democrats do have the numbers to break the filibuster, they still might not have enough votes to overcome other procedural hurdles and hold an up-or-down vote.</p><p>More than a dozen Republican senators, including Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, said that they would join a filibuster led by Rand Paul to stop debate on gun control legislation.</p><p>But at least eight other Senate Republicans broke ranks and said they would vote for cloture with the Democrats. From the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/04/09/democrats-on-verge-of-beating-back-gop-led-gun-filibuster/">Washington Post</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/dems_appear_to_have_the_votes_to_break_gun_control_filibuster/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/dems_appear_to_have_the_votes_to_break_gun_control_filibuster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans split on gun control filibuster</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/republicans_split_on_gun_control_filibuster/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/republicans_split_on_gun_control_filibuster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 16:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Filibuster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13265661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sen. Johnny Isakson said he thinks gun control legislation should get a “vote up or down"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As more Republican senators, including Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, announce that they will support a filibuster of gun control legislation, a few outliers have said that they disagree with blocking a vote.</p><p>Most recently, Sen. Johnny Isakson, R-Ga., <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/04/republicans-gun-vote-89798.html">said he thinks</a> there should be a “vote up or down."</p><p>“I’ll speak for myself on that question,” he said on CBS’s “This Morning.” “There’s no ambivalence on the gun issue, I think everyone knows what the issues are. We have not seen the final draft of the legislation that was produced, I understand, last night, but I think it deserves a vote up or down.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/republicans_split_on_gun_control_filibuster/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/republicans_split_on_gun_control_filibuster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McConnell planned to attack Judd as &#8220;emotionally unbalanced&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/mcconnell_planned_attack_judd_as_emotionally_unbalanced/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/mcconnell_planned_attack_judd_as_emotionally_unbalanced/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 13:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ashley Judd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13265684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A secret tape reveals Republicans intended to use the actress' struggles with depression against her]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Secret audiotapes <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/04/mitch-mcconnell-ashley-judd-secret-tape-senate">obtained by Mother Jones' David Corn</a> reveal that Mitch McConnell and his team discussed using actress Ashley Judd's childhood thoughts of suicide against her were she to mount a challenge to the Senate minority leader. Judd recently decided to forgo a run, but before she did, McConnell sat down with top staffers to discuss their strategy to fight her.</p><p>In addition to portraying her as a Hollywood liberal, the team suggested using her well-known struggles with depression against her, and essentially planned to portray her as an anti-American weirdo. "This sounds extreme, but she is emotionally unbalanced," the aide leading the meeting told McConnell.</p><p>In her 2011 memoir, Judd discussed her past bouts with depression, which included a brief hospitalization and the revelation that she had had thoughts of suicide -- in 6th grade. As they went through the material, McConnell's staff laughed heartily at several occasions and mocked Judd's comment about the culture shock she feels upon returning to the U.S. after a stint abroad.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/mcconnell_planned_attack_judd_as_emotionally_unbalanced/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/mcconnell_planned_attack_judd_as_emotionally_unbalanced/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ashley Judd adviser: Kentucky Dems &#8220;duped&#8221; the press to force her out</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/ashley_judd_adviser_kentucky_dems_duped_the_press_to_force_her_out/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/ashley_judd_adviser_kentucky_dems_duped_the_press_to_force_her_out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 13:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ashley Judd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13257612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jonathan Miller says the national media seized on false and "salacious recriminations" against Judd ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan Miller, a political adviser to Ashley Judd, claims that a small group of Kentucky Democrats fed the national press "salacious" lies in order to push her out of the race.</p><p>Miller writes on <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/04/01/how-kentucky-democrats-duped-the-msm-and-helped-elbow-out-ashley-judd.html">the Daily Beast</a>:</p><blockquote> <div> <p>As the actress contemplated whether to move back to Kentucky and challenge Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, I was alternating with Congressman John Yarmuth as witness for the defense against a steady stream of salacious recriminations.</p> </div> <div> <p>The prosecution was <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/16/us/politics/kentuckians-dont-rule-out-ashley-judd-as-potential-senator.html?pagewanted=all&amp;_r=0" target="_blank">assisted</a> in <a href="http://www.rollcall.com/news/kentucky_democrats_fear_judd_may_drag_down_ticket-222436-1.html" target="_blank">nearly</a> <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/14/ashley-judd-democrats_n_2686042.html" target="_blank">every</a> <a href="http://fatlip.leoweekly.com/2013/02/18/ashley-judd-the-general-assembly-and-the-ky-democratic-strategists-who-hate-her/" target="_blank">article</a> by the same handful of Democratic professionals railing against the prospects of a Judd candidacy, promoting instead the potential Senate candidacy of Kentucky’s young Secretary of State, Alison Lundergan Grimes. While many may legitimately believe that Grimes is the better candidate, many of those who have been quoted impugning Judd, or have done so on background, also have personal motives: some stand to profit from a Grimes campaign, some may have been trying to <a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/278977-kentucky-dems-not-sold-on-possible-judd-senate-run" target="_blank">redress perceived “disses”</a> by the actress, and some may be aiming to keep Grimes out of the 2015 gubernatorial race, where she could undermine their preferred candidates.</p> </div> </blockquote><div> <p>Among the lies, Miller says, was the report that Judd told supporters at a fundraiser,  “I have been raped twice, so I think I can handle Mitch McConnell," and that Bill Clinton himself was trying to force Judd out. Both, he writes, are untrue.</p> <p>Read the full article <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/04/01/how-kentucky-democrats-duped-the-msm-and-helped-elbow-out-ashley-judd.html">here</a>.</p> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/ashley_judd_adviser_kentucky_dems_duped_the_press_to_force_her_out/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/ashley_judd_adviser_kentucky_dems_duped_the_press_to_force_her_out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll: Americans say GOP &#8220;unwilling to compromise&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/poll_americans_say_gop_unwilling_to_compromise/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/poll_americans_say_gop_unwilling_to_compromise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 12:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13257611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new survey looked at the biggest critiques Americans have of each party]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new <a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/161573/americans-top-critique-gop-unwilling-compromise.aspx">Gallup</a> poll finds that the biggest critique of Republicans by Americans is that they're "too inflexible" and "unwilling to compromise," while for Democrats it's that they "spend too much" and "increase the budget deficit."</p><p>According to the poll, which measured what Americans dislike about each party, 21 percent of national adults said Republicans don't compromise, including 26 percent of Republicans, 17 percent of independents and 22 percent of Democrats. The second most common criticism was that Republicans are for "protecting the wealthy, not the middle class."</p><p>For Democrats, 14 percent said they spend too much, including 23 percent of Republicans, 11 percent of independents and 10 percent of Democrats. The second biggest criticism was that Democrats were also "unwilling to compromise."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/poll_americans_say_gop_unwilling_to_compromise/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/poll_americans_say_gop_unwilling_to_compromise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ashley Judd is not running for Senate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/ashley_judd_is_not_running_for_senate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/ashley_judd_is_not_running_for_senate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 21:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ashley Judd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13254000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kentucky Sen. Mitch McConnell would have attacked her as a Hollywood liberal]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ashley Judd will not mount a challenge to Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., in 2014, she announced today.</p><p>[embedtweet id="317020489564430337"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="317020733744226304"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="317020965978664960"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="317021214856069120"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="317021619543490561"]</p><p>From the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/03/27/ashley-judd-is-not-running-for-senate/">Washington Post</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Democratic Senate strategists have <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/03/04/ashley-judd-seems-like-she-is-running-for-senate-is-that-bad-thing-for-democrats/">argued</a> that Judd would be a good, if unconventional candidate, pointing to her ability to rival or even eclipse McConnell in fundraising. But McConnell’s path to victory involves savaging his opponent, and Judd’s status as an actress and celebrity would have offered him loads of ammunition.</p></blockquote><p>The most likely Democratic candidate is now Secretary of State Allison Lundergan Grimes.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/ashley_judd_is_not_running_for_senate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/ashley_judd_is_not_running_for_senate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bill Clinton, Kentucky Dems reportedly courting Ashley Judd alternative</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/bill_clinton_kentucky_dems_reportedly_eyeing_ashley_judd_alternative/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/bill_clinton_kentucky_dems_reportedly_eyeing_ashley_judd_alternative/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 11:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ashley Judd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13246636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Kentucky secretary of state may be getting a push to challenge McConnell in 2014]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kentucky Democrats, along with Bill Clinton, possibly worried about the potential pitfalls of an Ashley Judd candidacy, are reportedly pushing another state Democrat to challenge Sen. Mitch McConnell in 2014.</p><p><a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/03/kentucky-senate-2014-alison-lundergan-grimes-ashley-judd-89091.html">Politico</a> reports that Clinton is courting Alison Lundergan Grimes, the Kentucky secretary of state, to get into the race:</p><blockquote><p>Grimes does have the Clintons in her corner. Earlier this month, the former president — a longtime friend of Grimes’s father — privately urged the young secretary of state to mount a Senate bid while assuring Grimes that both he and his wife, Hillary, would get behind her should she decide to take on the powerful Senate GOP leader, according to several sources familiar with the matter.</p></blockquote><p>Grimes has also reportedly met with officials from the DSCC, according to Politico.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/bill_clinton_kentucky_dems_reportedly_eyeing_ashley_judd_alternative/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/bill_clinton_kentucky_dems_reportedly_eyeing_ashley_judd_alternative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Salon limerick contest</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/17/salon_limerick_contest_25/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/17/salon_limerick_contest_25/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Mar 2013 14:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salon limerick contest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ashley Judd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13243878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rhyming the news in five line poems]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week readers assess The Pope, Rand Paul and Ashley Judd:</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>To save cash, White House tours are curtailed,</p><p>But the House tours have NOT been derailed.</p><p>So you still can have fun,</p><p>Seeing nothing get done,</p><p>On the Hill, watching nonsense unveiled.</p><p>Madeleine Begun Kane</p><p>Bayside, N.Y.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>I must say I'm calling it quits,</p><p>On caring which cardinal sits,</p><p>In St. Peter's chair --</p><p>The whole damned affair,</p><p>Is Mardi Gras, minus the tits.</p><p>Nancy Cahill</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>The new Pope hails from Argentina.</p><p>And I’m wondering just what that might mean-a.</p><p>Let’s hope that his Latin,</p><p>Is smoother than satin,</p><p>And that his church is in for one big house clean-a.</p><p>Gary Sandy</p><p>Davis, Calif.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>In the senate McConnell's a dean,</p><p>Of the GOP obstruction machine.</p><p>But his name will be mud,</p><p>When our dear Ashley Judd,</p><p>Kicks his ass in twenty fourteen.</p><p>Mike Moulton</p><p>Gainesville, Fla.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Rand Paul held the floor by the hour,</p><p>His words pouring forth like a shower.</p><p>He could have gone on,</p><p>Saying drone use begone,</p><p>But his bladder held ultimate power.</p><p>Thompson Lange</p><p>Carmel, Calif.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/17/salon_limerick_contest_25/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/17/salon_limerick_contest_25/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McConnell at CPAC: Repeal Obamacare &#8220;root and branch&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/mcconnell_at_cpac_repeal_obamacare_root_and_branch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/mcconnell_at_cpac_repeal_obamacare_root_and_branch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 13:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Golden Girls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13230065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He also noted that the Dem ticket in 2016 is "shaping up to look like a rerun of 'The Golden Girls'" [UPDATED]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Update - March 15, 1:46 p.m.: </strong>The DSCC responded to McConnell's speech in a statement by spokesman Matt Canter: “Even many conservative Republicans acknowledge that Mitch McConnell is a huge part of the problem in Washington. Republicans, Democrats and Independents agree that Mitch McConnell cares more about playing politics than any principles - conservative or otherwise," he said.</p><p><strong>From earlier:</strong></p><p>Showcasing a tall stack of papers that he said was the text of the Affordable Care Act, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., told CPAC that "Obamacare should be repealed root and branch."</p><p>He noted in the course of his speech that the Affordable Care Act only passed by one vote, with all Senate Republicans voting against it. "We'll fight [Obamacare] and every other assault on liberty that the left throws at us, and restore the American ideal," he said.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/mcconnell_at_cpac_repeal_obamacare_root_and_branch/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/mcconnell_at_cpac_repeal_obamacare_root_and_branch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rand, Ashley and Mitch</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/rand_ashley_and_mitch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/rand_ashley_and_mitch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 17:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ashley Judd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul vs. Trey Grayson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky Derby]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13227914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kentucky used to be known for the Derby, UK basketball and bourbon. How did it become the center of U.S. politics?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, all it took for the rest of the country to notice Kentucky politics again was a Senate minority leader, a 13-hour filibuster and an actress-activist preparing for the role of candidate. Just like that, the Bluegrass State has emerged as the home base for some of the most interesting players -- and one of the most-discussed aspiring players – in Washington politics.</p><p>Sen. Mitch McConnell, in addition to being a fixture on the Sunday talk show circuit, leads a diverse Senate Republican caucus. Actress Ashley Judd continues to lay the groundwork for a potential run against McConnell in 2014, which has the national and state press abuzz. And the commonwealth’s junior senator, Rand Paul, just made a 13-hour splash on CSPAN-2 with his filibuster last week. And he’s a top contender for the GOP’s presidential nomination in 2016.</p><p>But this isn’t the result of some Kentucky machine churning out political superstars. “None of them came up in the traditional way. They didn’t come up through the Legislature. Even McConnell was sort of nobody’s protégé. He just kind of worked his way up,” said Trey Grayson, the former Kentucky secretary of state who is now director of the Harvard Institute of Politics.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/rand_ashley_and_mitch/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/rand_ashley_and_mitch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A reality check for Ashley Judd</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/a_reality_check_for_ashley_judd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/a_reality_check_for_ashley_judd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 11:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ashley Judd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13224823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What she's really up against, if she does run against Mitch McConnell in Kentucky. Inside the numbers and history]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/09/ashley-judd-senate-run_n_2843852.html?utm_hp_ref=politics">report over the weekend suggested</a> that actress Ashley Judd has decided to challenge Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell in Kentucky next year. According to Howard Fineman, who once covered Kentucky politics and remains well-connected in the state, Judd already has a pollster, has been interviewing consultants and potential staffers, and is eyeing an official rollout around the Kentucky Derby, held annually on the first Saturday in May.</p><p>Because of her star power and because of the political power of the man she wants to unseat, Judd’s flirtation with the race has drawn considerable national attention, and the coverage will only intensify if she gets in. That has led Dave Weigel, among others, to <a href="https://twitter.com/daveweigel/status/306541224750350338">argue</a> that the political world’s focus on Judd is misplaced – that her party label, liberal views and Hollywood background are all a poor match for an electorate that has become increasingly Republican over the last few decades.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/a_reality_check_for_ashley_judd/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/a_reality_check_for_ashley_judd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: Looks like Ashley Judd is running</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/10/report_looks_like_ashley_judd_is_running/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/10/report_looks_like_ashley_judd_is_running/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2013 21:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ashley Judd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky Derby]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13224711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a period of speculation, the actress's allies say she will run against Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Huffington Post <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/09/ashley-judd-senate-run_n_2843852.html?utm_hp_ref=politics">reports</a> that sources in Ashley Judd's camp say the 44 year-old actress is running for Senate in Kentucky against Senate Minority Leader and staunch Obama antagonist Mitch McConnell.</p><p>Reached via email, Judd</p><blockquote><p>...offered a not-quite-ironclad denial to The Huffington Post. “I am not sure who is saying this stuff, but it is not I! I’d prefer as a fan of your journalism that you stay accurate and credible. We told everyone who called us yesterday these stories are fabrications.”</p> <p>But she declined to specify which "stories,” did not say what wasn't "accurate,” and did not respond when asked directly whether she had, in fact, decided to run or chosen a time to declare her intentions.</p></blockquote><p>According to the piece, Judd plans to go public with her decision around the time of the Kentucky Derby when Kentuckyis in the media spotlight.</p><blockquote><p>Judd, sources say, is working with New York pollster Jefrey Pollock; has interviewed a number of media consultants including Anita Dunn, formerly of the Obama campaigns, and J.B. Poersch, the former head of the Democrats' national senate campaign committee, as well as leaders of Emily's List; and is lining up allies and field organizers.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/10/report_looks_like_ashley_judd_is_running/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/10/report_looks_like_ashley_judd_is_running/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>