<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/mitch_mcconnell_r_ky/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>President Obama picks a worthy enemy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/26/president_obama_picks_a_worthy_enemy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/26/president_obama_picks_a_worthy_enemy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10145421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell committed the GOP to blocking his agenda before Inauguration Day. Finally he's fighting back]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell doesn't want to be portrayed as a "villain," he should stop acting like one. On Sunday, McConnell complained about President Obama's efforts to make Republicans the bad guys for blocking his jobs bill. Now Obama's taking the fight directly to McConnell, and it's about time.</p><p>On CNN's "State of the Union" Sunday, McConnell objected to the idea that the federal government should provide the funds to keep cops, firefighters and teachers on the job.</p><p>"They are local and state employees," McConnell said. "The question is whether the federal government can afford to be bailing out states. I think the answer is no." He went on to whine, "Their story line is that there must be some villain out there who’s keeping this administration from succeeding."</p><p><strong></strong>On his West Coast tour Obama is hitting McConnell directly, and he's picked a great target. In Las Vegas yesterday, and again in San Francisco, he mocked McConnell for calling the effort to keep first responders on the job "a bailout," as though they were irresponsible Wall Street banking firms that got taxpayer support. "These aren't bad actors who somehow screwed up the economy. They didn't act irresponsibly. These are the men and women who teach our children, who patrol our streets, who run into burning buildings and save people. They deserve our support."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/26/president_obama_picks_a_worthy_enemy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/26/president_obama_picks_a_worthy_enemy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>128</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mitch McConnell: Truth teller</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/13/mitch_mcconnell_the_truth_teller/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/13/mitch_mcconnell_the_truth_teller/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 22:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Showdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt ceiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/07/13/mitch_mcconnell_the_truth_teller</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The senator tells talk radio that ruining the economy will be bad for the GOP brand. He's right!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If someone had told me at the beginning of this week that I would be writing almost nonstop about the antics of Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, I probably would have slit my wrists right then and there. It is my belief that his tenure as a Senate power broker will be remembered by future generations as marking the nadir of effective U.S. government. (Or at least I hope so, because if it gets any worse than this, we are truly doomed.) But his sudden transformation into desperate truth teller this week has been riveting. McConnell appears genuinely terrified that a failure to raise the debt limit will be a disaster for the Republican Party. So despite the outpouring of conservative rage that has greeted his complete capitulation in the negotiations for a new budget deal, he's doubling down on his scheme to give Obama practically unilateral power to raise the ceiling.</p><p>On Wednesday, McConnell gave an interview to conservative radio host Laura Ingraham. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/14/us/politics/14fiscal.html?hp">The New York Times summarizes:</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/13/mitch_mcconnell_the_truth_teller/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/13/mitch_mcconnell_the_truth_teller/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The fiendish brilliance of Mitch McConnell</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/12/the_fiendish_brilliance_of_mitch_mcconnell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/12/the_fiendish_brilliance_of_mitch_mcconnell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 20:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Showdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt ceiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/07/12/the_fiendish_brilliance_of_mitch_mcconnell</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Senate minority leader reveals his master debt ceiling plan: A year or more of unending political chaos]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell just drop a bomb on the debt ceiling negotiations? Details are sketchy, but <a href="http://www.redstate.com/erick/2011/07/12/it-is-time-to-burn-mitch-mcconnell-in-effigy-he-goes-pontius-pilate-on-the-debt-ceiling/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">the apoplectic reaction coming from the hard-line conservative camp</a> suggests the news trickling out is well worth paying attention to.</p><p>Here's what <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/2chambers/post/mcconnell-unveils-debt-limit-plan-b/2011/07/12/gIQAjqh3AI_blog.html">we know,</a> from the Associated Press:</p><blockquote>
<p>At a Capitol news conference little over an hour before the latest round of negotiations was set to begin at the White House, McConnell described a plan that would allow the debt ceiling to be raised in three separate stages through the end of next year, for a total of $2.5 trillion. The plan would place the political burden of raising the debt limit on President Obama and congressional Democrats, rather than on Republicans.</p>
</blockquote><p>On each of these three occasions, Obama would request a raise in the debt ceiling and propose offsetting spending cuts. Congress would then get to vote to approve or disapprove the president's proposal.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/12/the_fiendish_brilliance_of_mitch_mcconnell/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/12/the_fiendish_brilliance_of_mitch_mcconnell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A translation guide for nutty GOP debt ceiling rhetoric</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/12/a_translation_guide_for_kooky_gop_debt_ceiling_rhetoric/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/12/a_translation_guide_for_kooky_gop_debt_ceiling_rhetoric/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 16:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Showdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt ceiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner, R-Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann, R-Minn.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/07/12/a_translation_guide_for_kooky_gop_debt_ceiling_rhetoric</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What Mitch McConnell, Michele Bachmann, and John Boehner are saying -- and what they really mean]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Call me crazy, but if we set aside the question of whether or not we <em>agree</em> with the massive concessions offered by President Obama to get a debt ceiling deal, it seems clear to me that he has made a real proposal: Big cuts in return for smaller tax increases. The Republican response, however, has been a little more difficult to interpret, because, on the surface, it just seems utterly disconnected from reality.</p><p>So here's a little translation guide to help readers get some clarity.</p><p>
    <strong>What they say:</strong>
  </p><p>Michele Bachmann, <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/170847-bachmann-opens-door-to-raising-debt-limit-if-it-repeals-health-reform">explaining the only circumstances under which she would vote for raising the debt ceiling.</a></p><blockquote>
<p>"They'd have to cut an enormous amount, including they would have to defund Obamacare," she said on Fox News in response to a question about the circumstances under which she'd vote to raise the debt ceiling. "Because that's the largest entitlement in the history of the country."</p>
</blockquote><p>
    <strong>What she means:</strong>
  </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/12/a_translation_guide_for_kooky_gop_debt_ceiling_rhetoric/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/12/a_translation_guide_for_kooky_gop_debt_ceiling_rhetoric/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>146</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mitch McConnell uses Casey Anthony to make awful political point</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/11/casey_anthony_mcconnell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/11/casey_anthony_mcconnell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/07/11/casey_anthony_mcconnell</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senate minority leader renders satire obsolete]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell says we cannot try terror suspects in federal courts because <strike>9/11</strike> <a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/07/mcconnell_terrorists_could_get_off_in_civilian_cou.php">Casey Anthony</a>:</p><blockquote>
<p>"These are not American citizens. We just found with the Caylee Anthony case how difficult it is to get a conviction in a U.S. court," McConnell told "Fox News Sunday." "I don't think a foreigner is entitled to all the protection in the Bill of Rights. They should not be in U.S. courts and before military commissions."</p>
</blockquote><p>Thanks to the minority leader for <a href="http://prospect.org/csnc/blogs/adam_serwer_archive?month=07&amp;year=2011&amp;base_name=this_mitch_mcconnell_quote_is">demonstrating exactly why</a> so many people couldn't figure out that <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/07/05/casey_anthony_2012">my jokes</a> about Republicans responding to the Casey Anthony verdict were meant to be... jokes. I should know by now that there is no joking when it comes to the shamelessness and venality of these guys.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/11/casey_anthony_mcconnell/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/11/casey_anthony_mcconnell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How the GOP will force a repeal vote in the Senate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/20/repeal_senate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/20/repeal_senate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 16:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/01/20/repeal_senate</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It'll never get 60 votes, but forcing everyone to talk about undoing Obamacare is more fun than legislating]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exciting news! Having already wasted a day of everyone's time pretending to repeal the Affordable Care Act in the House of Representatives, Republicans are now set to force a vote on repeal in the Senate, where purely symbolic expressions of legislative sour grapes can take <em>weeks.</em></p><p>It was previously thought that Harry Reid would simply block a vote on repeal and that would be the end of it, but <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/01/gop-can-force-a-senate-vote-on-repeal/69935/">Minority Leader Mitch McConnell always finds a way.</a> He could use "Rule 14" to bring it to the floor, for example. Or -- and this is what he'll probably do -- he could attach repeal as an amendment to something likely to pass the Senate.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/20/repeal_senate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/20/repeal_senate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2010: The year of crying men</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/31/us_year_of_tears/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/31/us_year_of_tears/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 16:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner, R-Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/12/31/us_year_of_tears</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The past year was one replete with Boehner-style bawling]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When pro football player Cedric Benson led his Cincinnati Bengals to a long-awaited victory that ended a 10-game losing streak, his eyes grew wet and a tear ran down his cheek as he stood before his locker afterward.</p><p>The running back said he felt wonderful, tremendous, joyful. So why the public cry? Relief, strong emotions after a lot of tough times for him and the team, and ... well, why not?</p><p>After all, Rep. John Boehner, who lives just north of Cincinnati, wept on national TV the night Republican election victories assured he will be the nation's next speaker of the House. And from the neighboring state to the south, Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., choked up as he bid farewell this month to a retiring colleague.</p><p>Just a few examples of well-known males turning on the waterworks in a Year of the Tear, four decades after Marvin Gaye sang that "I know a man ain't supposed to cry" and a Democratic presidential contender's campaign foundered under the weight of reports he teared up.</p><p>Maine Sen. Edmund Muskie had plans that morning in 1972 to call out the publisher of the Manchester (N.H.) Union Leader over criticism of his wife. But reports that he had tears in his eyes -- which Muskie went to his grave insisting were melted snowflakes -- raised questions about whether he could handle crises or stare down the Russians.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/31/us_year_of_tears/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/31/us_year_of_tears/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How long will it take Republicans to demoralize their base?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/16/earmarks_compromise_controversy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/16/earmarks_compromise_controversy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Cornyn, R-Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/12/16/earmarks_compromise_controversy</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Thune's earmark hypocrisy suggests that it could happen in record time]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The people desperate for Republicans to nominate someone who isn't Mitt Romney have been talking up John Thune for months, but if his performance in the ongoing omnibus spending bill debacle is any indication, he's not yet ready for the rigors of a national campaign. He's barely ready for the rigors of high school debate class.</p><p>Thune just made a classic unforced error, by <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/hypocrisy-alert-abc-news-grills-gop-leaders-earmarks/story?id=12403958">requesting earmarks in the omnibus spending bill</a> (wasteful government spending!) despite voting to voluntarily ban earmarks. He made things worse when he was utterly unable to square his requests with his opposition to the bill.</p><p>Orrin Hatch embarrassed him further, <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/12/attn-gop-porkers-hatch-had-his-earmark-requests-stripped-from-spending-bill.php">when Hatch voluntarily withdrew his earmark requests from the bill</a> entirely, because, well, he did just vote for that earmark moratorium. Why didn't Thune do the same? "I guess I hadn't thought about doing it," <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/12/attn-gop-porkers-hatch-had-his-earmark-requests-stripped-from-spending-bill.php">he told Talking Points Memo.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/16/earmarks_compromise_controversy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/16/earmarks_compromise_controversy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jim DeMint caves on bill-reading stunt</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/15/senate_obstruction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/15/senate_obstruction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim DeMint, R-S.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Cornyn, R-Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/12/15/senate_obstruction</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Senate won't have to spend 12 hours listening to the START treaty, but spending bill fight hasn't even begun]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As we all know, Republicans were only delaying and obstructing action in the Senate to force a vote on the Bush tax cuts, in order to restore confidence to our nation's job-creating billionaires. Once the Senate approved the tax cut deal, Republicans immediately ... <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plum-line/2010/12/jim_demints_justification.html?wprss=plum-line">threatened to bring all Senate activity to a halt</a>, for days, while also demanding that they not have to go to work on or after Christmas.</p><p>Sen. Jim DeMint wanted to do that thing where one senator can demand that bills be read aloud in their entirety. DeMint was going to give the New START treaty and the omnibus spending bill the bedtime story treatment, until, apparently, <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/Todd_Zwillich/status/15130979949608961">Mitch McConnell made him back down.</a> (But not before Harry Reid's press secretary <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/ManleySenate/status/15116503091249153">got in this awesome zing.</a> Hey, Harry Reid's press secretary, you wouldn't have to just impotently insult Jim DeMint's obstructionism on Twitter if your boss hadn't spent his tenure as majority leader enabling the obstruction by refusing to change archaic Senate rules allowing endless obstructionism!)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/15/senate_obstruction/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/15/senate_obstruction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP will just delay &#8220;don&#8217;t ask, don&#8217;t tell&#8221; repeal to death</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/06/dadt_delay/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/06/dadt_delay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don't Ask Don't Tell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Lieberman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/12/06/dadt_delay</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senate Republicans agree: There's just no time to debate the 17-year-old policy before Christmas]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democrats are frantically finalizing the details of their capitulation on the "temporary" extension of low tax rates for the super-wealthy, in part so that they can just move on from the depressing tax issue and maybe get some votes on other stuff taken care of before Rand Paul shows up next month with his snake flag and his MESSAGE FROM THE TEA PARTIES. One of the things Democrats would like to vote on is the Defense Authorization bill, which includes the repeal of "don't ask, don't tell." It is looking less and less likely that they'll get it done. Unless Joe Liberman, of all people, saves the day.</p><p>As I explained last week, <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/12/01/dadt_tax_cuts_victim">all signs point to Republicans successfully running out the clock</a> on this legislative session without any action on anything besides tax cuts. Robert Gates must be a War Room reader, <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1210/46013.html">because he predicted doom for "don't ask, don't tell" repeal on an aircraft carrier, today.</a></p><blockquote>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;d have to say I&#8217;m not particularly optimistic that they&#8217;re going to get this done, I would hope that they would,&#8221; he said during a town hall style meeting with sailors in one of the ship&#8217;s massive hangars.</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/06/dadt_delay/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/06/dadt_delay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate GOP leader: WikiLeaks head a &#8216;terrorist&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/05/us_us_wikileaks_mcconnell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/05/us_us_wikileaks_mcconnell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 17:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan War Logs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WikiLeaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/12/05/us_us_wikileaks_mcconnell</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell rips WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, wants him prosecuted for 'enormous damage' done]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell is calling the founder of the online site WikiLeaks a "high-tech terrorist" for releasing classified material from the U.S. government.</p><p>McConnell says that the online release of secret diplomat exchanges has done "enormous damage" to the country and to its relationship with its allies.</p><p>McConnell tells NBC's "Meet the Press" that he hopes WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange will be prosecuted for the disclosures. And he says that if it's found that Assange hasn't violated the law, then the law should be changed.</p><p>Of Assange, McConnell says, "I think the man is a high-tech terrorist."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/05/us_us_wikileaks_mcconnell/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/05/us_us_wikileaks_mcconnell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>79</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Don&#8217;t ask, don&#8217;t tell&#8221; probably not happening any time soon</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/01/dadt_tax_cuts_victim/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/01/dadt_tax_cuts_victim/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don't Ask Don't Tell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Lieberman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/12/01/dadt_tax_cuts_victim</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pentagon review or no, repeal of the discriminatory policy is probably a victim of GOP tax cut posturing]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moderate Republicans won't have to bother to actively come up with reasons to oppose the repeal of "don't ask, don't tell," because I'm pretty sure that the infuriating debate over the method by which we'll eventually extend the deficit-exploding Bush-era tax rates will consume the entirety of the lame duck session.</p><p>Joe Lieberman, who is in the right on this issue, <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/131399-sen-lieberman-dadt-could-pass-if-given-enough-time">says there are 60 votes for repeal</a>, but he can't say which Republican senators would actually vote to end a filibuster. He can't say which ones would do that because, <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/michaeltomasky/2010/dec/01/us-military-congress-dadt-repeal-dead">if the letter all of the Republican senators signed is any indication</a>, not a single one of them -- not Susan Collins, Olympia Snowe, Dick Lugar, or Lindsay Graham -- will vote to invoke cloture on <em>anything</em> until the Democrats finish caving entirely on extension of the Bush tax rates.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/01/dadt_tax_cuts_victim/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/01/dadt_tax_cuts_victim/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Mitch McConnell is worse than Charles Rangel</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/17/mcconnell_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/17/mcconnell_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 00:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Rangel, D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toyota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joe_conason//2010/11/16/mcconnell</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Both men misused their power -- but the Senate leader gave corrupt BAE Systems $17 million in 2010 earmarks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the same day that the House Ethics Committee convicted Rep. Charles Rangel of nearly a dozen violations of congressional rules, Sen. Mitch McConnell announced that under pressure from fellow Republicans, he will surrender his beloved earmarks. This is a notable coincidence because, like Rangel, McConnell has rewarded corporate donors to an academic center named after him -- and used earmarks for that purpose. The top corporate recipient of earmarks from the Kentucky Republican in the 2010 budget not only happens to be a donor to the <a href="http://louisville.edu/mcconnellcenter/">McConnell Center for Political Leadership</a> at the University of Louisville, but one of the largest and most corrupt defense contractors in the world.</p><p>Topping the list of Rangel's transgressions was the misuse of his congressional clout to raise money for a vanity academic "center" named after him at the City University of New York from private donors. Yet somehow McConnell got away with the same kind of dubious dealings at the University of Louisville -- and was allowed to reward BAE Systems, donor of $500,000 to the McConnell Center, with <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/earmarks.php?cid=n00003389">$17 million worth of defense earmarks.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/17/mcconnell_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/17/mcconnell_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reid, McConnell stay in Senate top party posts</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/16/us_senate_leadership/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/16/us_senate_leadership/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 16:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/11/16/us_senate_leadership</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dick Durbin will continue as assistant majority leader, and Arizona's Jon Kyl remains GOP whip]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senate Democrats and Republicans have returned their respective party leaders to their posts following an election in which the top Democrat scrambled to retain his seat and the senior Republican picked up 13 new senators.</p><p>Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid of Nevada kept his post, as did Kentucky Republican Mitch McConnell, the minority leader.</p><p>Illinois Democratic Sen. Dick Durbin will continue as assistant majority leader, Sen. Charles Schumer of New York will stay on as vice chairman of the Democratic conference and Sen. Patty Murray of Washington will remain conference secretary.</p><p>On the Republican side, Sen. Jon Kyl of Arizona remains GOP whip, Sen. Lamar Alexander of Tennessee continues as Republican Conference chairman and Sen. John Barrasso of Wyoming remains conference vice chairman.</p><p>THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP's earlier story is below.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/16/us_senate_leadership/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/16/us_senate_leadership/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bush book reveals McConnell&#8217;s hypocrisy on Iraq</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/10/mcconnell_bush_iraq/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/10/mcconnell_bush_iraq/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 20:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/11/10/mcconnell_bush_iraq</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ky. senator privately advocated an Iraq pullout even as he publicly blasted Democrats for the same position]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before the 2006 midterm elections in which Republicans ultimately took a clobbering, Sen. Mitch McConnell asked President Bush in a private Oval Office meeting to pull some troops out of Iraq in order to boost the GOP's chances, Bush reports in his new memoir.</p><p>And in the same month -- September 2006 -- that McConnell made his private request, he publicly blasted Democrats for calling for a reduction of troops in Iraq, saying that their position endangered Americans.&#160;</p><p>"The Democrat leadership finally agrees on something -- unfortunately it's retreat," McConnell <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/04/AR2006090400967.html">said</a> in a Sept. 5, 2006, statement in response to a Democratic letter asking Bush to change his Iraq policy. Using blistering language, McConnell continued:</p><p>"Whether they call it 'redeployment' or 'phased withdrawal,' the effect is the same: We would leave Americans more vulnerable and Iraqis at the mercy of al-Qaeda, a terrorist group whose aim -- toward Iraqis and Americans -- is clear."</p><p>The Democratic <a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1695808/posts">letter</a> had asked Bush to begin&#160;"the phased redeployment of U.S. forces" from Iraq.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/10/mcconnell_bush_iraq/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/10/mcconnell_bush_iraq/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mitch McConnell: Tea Party hostage</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/04/mitch_mcconnell_obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/04/mitch_mcconnell_obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 17:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/11/04/mitch_mcconnell_obama</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Less than 48 hours after the election, the top Senate Republican calls for President Obama's defeat in 2012]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let's be clear why Mitch McConnell, the Senate's Republican leader, decided less than 48 hours after the midterm results were announced <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/04/mitch-mcconnell-heritage-health-care_n_778796.html">to deliver a speech</a> to a right-wing organization reiterating his previous statement that the GOP's top priority should be President Obama's defeat in 2012: He's feeling the heat from the Tea Party.</p><p>"Over the past week," McConnell said Thursday morning at the Heritage Foundation, "some have said it was indelicate of me to suggest that our top political priority over the next two years should be to deny President Obama a second term in office. But the fact is, if our primary legislative goals are to repeal and replace the health spending bill, to end the bailouts, cut spending and shrink the size and scope of government, the only way to do all these things is to put someone in the White House who won't veto any of these things."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/04/mitch_mcconnell_obama/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/04/mitch_mcconnell_obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reid deal with McConnell kills recess appointments</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/30/senate_ends_recess_appointments/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/30/senate_ends_recess_appointments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mary Landrieu, D-La.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/09/30/senate_ends_recess_appointments</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Senate compromise means more than a 100 open government positions will remain unfilled]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good news: The Senate finally managed to confirm 54 of Barack Obama's non-controversial nominees for various federal and judicial offices. Bad news: <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/99219/two-nominees-make-it-to-the-fed-one-does-not">More than 110 nominees remain in limbo.</a> Hilarious news: The deal Harry Reid struck with Mitch McConnell to confirm these nominees means <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/09/the_senate_becomes_a_little_mo.html">Obama can't appoint any other nominees while the Senate is in recess.</a></p><p>Minority Leader McConnell basically ended the president's one method of bypassing a broken Senate confirmation process, by getting Red to keep the Senate officially in session during their upcoming six-week recess. This deal getting struck this time basically means that every future Senate minority leader will hold up every future president's nominees until getting the same deal -- which means that, in lieu of Senate rules reform, we've just seen the end of recess appointments. (Unless future Democratic minorities are spineless enough to give in to future Republican presidents, which is certainly possible.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/09/30/senate_ends_recess_appointments/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/30/senate_ends_recess_appointments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are Democrats toast in November?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/08/are_democrats_toast_in_november/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/08/are_democrats_toast_in_november/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 01:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner, R-Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh//politics/2010/09/07/are_democrats_toast_in_november</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Imagine Boehner hosting Lily Ledbetter for an equal-pay unsigning ceremony, while McConnell cuts kids' health care!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tuesday was the official first day of the political season, with Labor Day finally behind us, and I woke up to this screaming headline in Politico's Playbook: "New wave of polls points to Nov. blowout - Stu Rothenberg moves 20 House races toward GOP." Cable TV was dominated by similar apocalyptic reports from the future, mainly based on two new polls with bad news for Democrats.</p><p>The Wall St. Journal/NBC News poll found that Republicans have a 9 point advantage in generic national ballot preferences; the Washington Post/ABC poll found the GOP held a 13 point lead. (It's worth noting, however, that Gallup's weekly tracking poll, which found a 10 point GOP lead last week, has the parties tied today; go figure.) There was other disturbing news in the two media polls, most notably that voters have gotten less confident in the Democrats' ability to fix the economy and now trust Republicans more on that front.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/09/08/are_democrats_toast_in_november/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/08/are_democrats_toast_in_november/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>232</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mitch McConnell&#8217;s tax cut lies</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/24/mitch_mcconnell_tax_lies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/24/mitch_mcconnell_tax_lies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 06:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh//politics/2010/08/23/mitch_mcconnell_tax_lies</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why does the GOP get away with saying tax cuts for the rich are "existing tax policy"? Or that they create jobs?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't see the Park51 controversy <a href="http://stage.mps.beta.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/">as a mere distraction</a> from the country's "real" issues of unemployment and economic trouble. What matters more than our nation's tradition of religious and political freedom? But it's clear to me that the "mosque" issue is this August's version of last August's "death panels" &#8211; another faux-Fox controversy manufactured by divisive right-wingers to keep us from focusing on our country's serious problems.</p><p>What would Republicans do without the "mosque" flap, if they had to vigorously defend, in detail, their economic program? Sunday on "Meet the Press," Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell was as preposterous as <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh/politics/2010/08/10/john_boehner_let_them_play_golf">House Minority Leader John Boehner</a> on the same show two weeks ago, blustering about having to account for how much extending the Bush tax cuts for the megarich &#8211; set to expire in 2011 -- will deepen the deficit. Just as Boehner sputtered and refused to answer repeatedly, then blamed "this Washington game and their funny accounting" for the vexing fact that protecting the megarich will add $3.2 trillion to the deficit, so did McConnell obfuscate. "Why did it all of a sudden become something that we, quote, 'pay for'?" McConnell asked host David Gregory, calling the tax cuts "existing tax policy."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/08/24/mitch_mcconnell_tax_lies/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/24/mitch_mcconnell_tax_lies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>143</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mitch McConnell: Flip-flopper</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/29/oil_industry_bailout/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/29/oil_industry_bailout/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 00:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Bailouts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gulf Oil Spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2010/05/28/oil_industry_bailout</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First he was for bailouts, then we was against them. Now he's ready to prop up the oil industry at taxpayer expense]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on John Kerry's 2004 declaration that "I actually did vote for the $87 billion before I voted against it," you could credibly argue that the Massachusetts Democrat is the founder of modern political flip-flopping -- the James Naismith of the political world's most dazzling sport. By that metric, though, you would also have to acknowledge that Kentucky Republican Sen. Mitch McConnell is the game's Michael Jordan.</p><p>As the upper chamber's GOP leader, McConnell backed the Wall Street bailout in 2008, calling it "one of the finest moments in the history of the Senate." A year and a half later, he was telling reporters that he vehemently opposes bailouts of big business.</p><p>Now, just weeks after that textbook "for-it-before-against-it" feat, McConnell and his Republican cohorts are leaping past the Kerry-inspired fundamentals. Determined to pull off an all-star caliber act of "for-it-against-it-for-it" acrobatics, the GOP is pushing a bailout for yet another big business: the oil industry.</p><p>True, we haven't heard that word -- "bailout" -- during the <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/louisiana_oil_spill/index.html">Gulf disaster</a>, which the government calls the worst petroleum spill in U.S. history. But we have heard a lot about the oil industry's "liability cap" -- a term that is just another synonym for "bailout."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/29/oil_industry_bailout/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/29/oil_industry_bailout/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

