<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Mitt Romney</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/mitt_romney/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 16:47:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The real way to fix the deficit: Stop coddling the rich</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/the_real_way_to_fix_the_deficit_stop_coddling_the_rich/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/the_real_way_to_fix_the_deficit_stop_coddling_the_rich/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 22:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Next New Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Policy Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Instead of cutting aid to the poor, the president and Congress should focus on reforming costly tax expenditures]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nextnewdeal.net/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/05/next-new-deal-logo.png" alt="Next New Deal" align="left" /></a> While we often hear critics decrying the redistributive effects of American social spending, government aid does not always benefit households of limited means. Often, aid looks more like a million-dollar vacation home or a luxury health insurance plan than housing vouchers and food stamps. American social spending is more complex than a simple redistribution from high- to low-income households. Over time, the country’s tax and transfer system has adopted provisions that reward specific high-income households. These programs contribute to deficit growth and detract from spending targeted at alleviating poverty among working families.</p><p>The most generous social welfare programs are currently administered through the tax code. A list of itemized deductions on households’ income tax returns serves as the only indication of these benefits. Income tax deductions, exclusions, deferrals, and credits, known collectively as “tax expenditures,” amount to more than $1 trillion of federal spending (according to estimates by the <a href="http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/UploadedPDF/1001542-Spending-In-Disguise-Marron.pdf" target="_blank">Tax Policy Center</a>), not including lower tax rates on capital gains and dividends to encourage investment.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/the_real_way_to_fix_the_deficit_stop_coddling_the_rich/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/the_real_way_to_fix_the_deficit_stop_coddling_the_rich/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What happens to a DREAM Act deferred?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/what_happens_to_a_dream_act_deferred/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/what_happens_to_a_dream_act_deferred/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Prospect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dream Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13157374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama's pledged to prioritize immigration reform. The Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals is a nice start]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.prospect.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/10/TAP_new_logo6.png" alt="The American Prospect" align="left" /></a> At first, it looked like 2012 would be another terrible year for immigration reform advocates. Mitt Romney won the Republican presidential primary by adopting a xenophobic, right-wing platform, advocating for policies against immigrants so terrible they led to self-deportation. Meanwhile Barack Obama continued to deport undocumented workers at an unprecedented pace—he’s sent 1.4 million people out of the country through July of this year—and failed to introduce comprehensive legislation, as he’d promised.</p><p>A brighter picture is emerging, however. In June, Obama signed an executive order called Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), which operates like the failed DREAM Act would have. Obama ordered Homeland Security to lay off deportation proceedings against immigrants who came into the country as children and who have completed high school or served in the military. Immigrants who meet those qualifications can now request a reprieve to remain in the country.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/what_happens_to_a_dream_act_deferred/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/what_happens_to_a_dream_act_deferred/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>12 for &#8217;12: The year in politics</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/25/12_for_12_the_year_in_politics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/25/12_for_12_the_year_in_politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2012 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best of 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Santorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandra Fluke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Matthews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Christie]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13153873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[12 people who defined the last 12 months of American politics]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To close out 2012, I’ve looked back at each month and selected one individual who loomed large in the news and whose story tells us something significant about the year in politics. This is an admittedly imprecise exercise. Not all months are created equally. There are some months when multiple people could have been chosen; in other months, the pickings were slim. And in some cases, the names I’ve chosen offer a reminder that in political journalism, what seems vitally important one day can seem trivial the next.  Anyway, on to the list:</p><p><strong>January: Newt Gingrich</strong></p><p>To anyone who’d just been teleported from the year 1999, the scene in Charleston, South Carolina on the night of January 21 had to be impossible to fathom: There was Newt Gingrich, the man who’d been marched off the political stage by his own party after a disastrous four-year run as House Speaker, declaring victory in a Republican presidential primary. And not just any primary: South Carolina, a historically pivotal early contest. And not just a victory – an absolute landslide.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/25/12_for_12_the_year_in_politics/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/25/12_for_12_the_year_in_politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: Romney held off conceding until after Karl Rove&#8217;s meltdown</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/24/tagg_romney_mitt_didnt_really_want_to_be_president/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/24/tagg_romney_mitt_didnt_really_want_to_be_president/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2012 17:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tagg Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13154202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Election Night, Mitt Romney reportedly delayed conceding the race to Obama while Rove objected on-air]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Boston Globe reports that Mitt Romney held off on conceding the presidential race on Election Night during Karl Rove's infamous meltdown on Fox News over the returns in Ohio, and only made the call once Rove had been proven incorrect.</p><p>From The Globe:</p><blockquote><p>Arriving at his suite in the Westin Boston Waterfront ­hotel, Romney received regular updates from his staff. He made small talk about the Patriots and the Celtics and played with his grandchildren. He was about to concede around 11:15 p.m when Republican strategist Karl Rove made his now-infamous appearance on Fox News Channel, insisting that his own network was wrong in calling Ohio for the president.</p> <div> <p>The concession call was canceled, followed by an hour of uncertainty. Then, after Fox ­executives dismissed Rove’s concerns and stood by the network’s projection, Romney said: Call the president.</p> </div> </blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/24/tagg_romney_mitt_didnt_really_want_to_be_president/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/24/tagg_romney_mitt_didnt_really_want_to_be_president/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tagg Romney: Mitt had &#8220;no desire&#8221; to run</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/tagg_romney_mitt_had_no_desire_to_run/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/tagg_romney_mitt_had_no_desire_to_run/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 15:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tagg Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13153733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A behind the scenes account in the Boston Globe finds cluelessness at the Romney campaign's highest levels]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div> <p>Just how bad was Mitt Romney's campaign? So bad that top Republican officials are now trying to "reverse engineer" his race to make sure no GOP candidate ever makes the same mistakes.</p> <p><a href="http://www.boston.com/news/politics/2012/president/2012/12/23/the-story-behind-mitt-romney-loss-the-presidential-campaign-president-obama/2QWkUB9pJgVIi1mAcIhQjL/story.html">According to a behind-the-scenes story of the Romney campaign in today's Boston Globe</a> -- by reporter Michael Kranish, who co-authored the biography "The Real Romney" -- Mitt's aides are still in disbelief over what hit them.</p> <p>It describes a campaign that was deeply divided on whether to run on Romney's biography or on his business record. Ultimately, the paper reports, Romney sided with campaign manager Stuart Stevens rather than with the family members who wanted to stress his biography.</p> <p>Among the revelations in the story:</p> <p>* Romney's Ohio director had no idea what Obama's campaign was doing with all of its ground-game power. In a hilarious quote, Rich Beeson tells the paper: “Now I know what they were doing with all the staffs and ­offices. They were literally creating a one-to-one contact with voters.”</p> <p>* Beeson wasn't the only mystified member of the team. The Globe reports that when Tagg Romney studied Obama's spending patterns, he "could not figure it out. Why had Obama spent so heavily during the primaries when he had no primary opponent? Only later did Tagg realize this was a key to Obama’s victory."</p> <div> <p>“We were looking at all the money they were spending in the primary and we were thinking ‘what are they spending all their money on? They’re wasting a lot of money.’ They weren’t," he told the Globe. "They were paying staffers in Florida.”</p> </div> <p>* Romney's campaign was caught flat-footed on social media. They wanted to build a Facebook app to locate voters who do not have landlines. They did not unveil it until three weeks before the campaign, and it was downloaded only 40,000 times. In contrast, Obama's had been released months earlier, and was downloaded some 1 million times. The project's coordinator tells the paper that the goal was: “Can we do 80 percent of what the Obama campaign is doing, in 20 percent of the time, at 10 percent of the cost?”</p> <p>* Romney was still convinced he would win Ohio. Beeson, in late October, wrote a memo that "all but ridiculed the notion that the Republican presidential nominee, with his 'better ground game,' could lose." One problem, as the Globe notes: "But the claims proved wildly off the mark, a fact embarrassingly underscored when the high-tech voter turnout system that Romney himself called 'state of the art' crashed at the worst moment, on Election Day."</p> </div><div> <p>* And in perhaps the money quote of the whole piece, Tagg Romney tells the paper: “He wanted to be president less than anyone I’ve met in my life. He had no desire to . . . run."</p> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/tagg_romney_mitt_had_no_desire_to_run/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/tagg_romney_mitt_had_no_desire_to_run/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>71</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How much did Sheldon Adelson spend on the 2012 election?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/how_much_did_sheldon_adelson_spend_on_the_2012_election/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/how_much_did_sheldon_adelson_spend_on_the_2012_election/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ProPublica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheldon Adelson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Crossroads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13152938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We may never know the exact figure, but it's a safe bet that he spent more than he originally pledged to beat Obama]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.propublica.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/12/Logo-e1354323738840.jpg" alt="ProPublica" align="left" /></a> Exactly how much, you ask?</p><p>We don't really know, and it's likely we never will. Many of the groups that spent the most on the election aren't required to report their donors. But thanks to recent campaign finance filings, we can get a better idea.</p><p>We dug through Federal Election Commission and Internal Revenue Service records and found that Adelson and his wife, Miriam, spent at least $98 million this election cycle. The money went to at least 34 different candidates and groups, with contributions ranging from $2,000 for a Florida congressional candidate to $30 million for <a href="http://restoreourfuture.com/about">Restore Our Future</a>, the super PAC that supported Mitt Romney.</p><p>Adelson also gave $20 million to <a href="http://www.winningourfuture.com/">Winning Our Future</a>, a super PAC backing Newt Gingrich; $23 million to <a href="http://www.americancrossroads.org/about/">American Crossroads</a>, a conservative super PAC; and $5 million each to the <a href="http://www.congressionalleadershipfund.org/about/">Congressional Leadership Fund</a> and the <a href="http://ygaction.com/about-yg/">YG Action Fund</a>, both of which supported Republican candidates for Congress.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/how_much_did_sheldon_adelson_spend_on_the_2012_election/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/how_much_did_sheldon_adelson_spend_on_the_2012_election/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bank robber wears Mitt Romney mask</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/bank_robber_wears_mitt_romney_mask/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/bank_robber_wears_mitt_romney_mask/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 16:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney mask]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romney mask bank robbery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13125014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stranger still: The same branch was robbed by someone in a Hillary Clinton mask two years ago]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since losing the election to President Obama, Mitt Romney has been <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/post_election_mitt_romney_is_just_your_average_guy/">spotted at gas stations, "Twilight" screenings and theme parks.</a></p><p>But the guy who robbed a bank in Virginia yesterday wasn't really Mitt -- it was just <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/crime-scene/post/man-wearing-a-mitt-romney-mask-robs-wells-fargo-bank-in-sterling/2012/12/14/e6b0bc00-45fa-11e2-8e70-e1993528222d_blog.html">a man in a Mitt Romney mask.</a></p><p>A man wearing a Mitt Romney mask -- and a Florida State sweatshirt -- held up a Wells Fargo in Sterling, Va., on Thursday morning and got away with an unreported amount of cash, the Washington Post reports.</p><p>Even weirder: The <a href="http://dcist.com/2012/12/northern_va_bank_robbed_by_the_man.php">same branch was robbed</a> in 2010 by someone wearing a Hillary Clinton mask.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/bank_robber_wears_mitt_romney_mask/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/bank_robber_wears_mitt_romney_mask/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The real top lie of 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/the_real_top_lie_of_2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/the_real_top_lie_of_2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 20:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13123064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mitt Romney was awarded Politifact's Lie of the Year -- and it wasn't even for his biggest whopper]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations, Mitt Romney! You lost the presidential race, but you won another big contest: <a href="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2012/dec/12/lie-year-2012-Romney-Jeeps-China/">You're Politifact's Liar of the Year</a>, for your brazen claim that thanks to the Obama auto restructuring, Chrysler was "going to build Jeeps in China," costing Americans jobs.</p><p>In fact, of the top 10 worst political lies Politifact nominated, four came straight from Romney. In addition to the Jeep lie, he was dinged for claiming Obama began his presidency "with an apology tour," that the president gutted the work requirement for welfare, and that he told business owners "you didn't build that" when in context he said they didn't build businesses alone.  Only two of the top lies came directly from Obama (exaggerating George Bush's responsibility for the deficit and claiming Romney called Arizona's draconian immigration laws a model for the nation). The rest came from campaign surrogates or television ads.  In what feels like standard Politifact false equivalence, Democrats and Republicans were responsible for five lies apiece.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/the_real_top_lie_of_2012/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/the_real_top_lie_of_2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romney wins &#8220;lie of the year&#8221; award</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/romney_wins_lie_of_the_year_award/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/romney_wins_lie_of_the_year_award/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeep]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politifact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign ads]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13122884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mitt Romney's claim that Jeep is moving production to China earned him the nod from PolitiFact ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PolitiFact awarded its “<a href="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2012/dec/12/lie-year-2012-Romney-Jeeps-China/">lie of the year</a>" award this morning, and the winner is Mitt Romney, specifically his claim that Jeep is moving U.S. production to China.</p><p>Here’s is the ad that delivered the win to Romney:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/0dnfed-DjKo?feature=player_detailpage" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p>Despite outrage from the media and the public, and a denial from Jeep’s parent company, the Romney campaign stood by the claim.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/romney_wins_lie_of_the_year_award/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/romney_wins_lie_of_the_year_award/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rename &#8220;Game Change 2012&#8243;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/rename_game_change_2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/rename_game_change_2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Halperin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Game Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Double Down]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13122108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATED: With our favorite suggestion for what the political potboiler should be called]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>UPDATED: Dec. 12, 6:24 p.m. (EST): </strong>My favorite suggestion for what the "Game Change" sequel should be named was "Same Change" Michael Serafino of Brooklyn.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>You can almost here the cries of “Too soon! Too soon!”</p><p>Following up on the campaign that wouldn't end, political scribblers Mark Halperin (no relation to this writer) and John Heilemann are going to ensure that the 2012 election lives forever in breezy prose. Following up on their bestselling, absurdly readable account of the 2008 race, “<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Game-Change-Clintons-McCain-Lifetime/dp/B0058M62SE/saloncom08-20">Game Change: Obama and the Clintons, McCain and Palin, and the Race of a Lifetime,</a>” Halperin and Heilemann will be unleashing “Double Down: Game Change 2012” on a defenseless public, the Hollywood Reporter <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/hbo-developing-game-change-sequel-400798">reports</a>. Penguin is the publisher and HBO has already optioned the book.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/rename_game_change_2012/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/rename_game_change_2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romney attends the Pacquiao fight in Vegas</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/romney_attends_the_pacquiao_fight_in_vegas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/romney_attends_the_pacquiao_fight_in_vegas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 17:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ann Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boxing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manny Pacquiao]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13119705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Hello Manny. I ran for president. I lost," Romney reportedly said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitt and Ann Romney were spotted ringside at the boxing match between Juan Manuel Marquez and Manny Pacquiao in Las Vegas on Saturday night, in which Pacquiao lost.</p><p>Romney also met Pacquiao before the fight to wish him luck. According the <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/08/romney-pacquiao_n_2265358.html">AP</a>, Pacquiao's publicist Fred Sternburg says that Romney added: "Hello Manny. I ran for president. I lost."</p><p>The AP writes: "The Romneys arrived during the undercard, drawing little reaction from the crowd."</p><p>Here's video of Romney meeting Pacquiao before the fight:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/m_4KJsTLE9E" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/romney_attends_the_pacquiao_fight_in_vegas/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/romney_attends_the_pacquiao_fight_in_vegas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mitt and Ann enjoy fight night, take in Pacquiao-Marquez</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/mitt_and_anns_fight_night/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/mitt_and_anns_fight_night/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 07:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ann Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manny Pacquiao]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13119542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Hello Manny. I ran for president. I lost," Romney told Pacquiao before the boxer's stunning knockout defeat]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LAS VEGAS (AP) -- Defeated presidential candidate Mitt Romney was a guest ringside Saturday night at the fourth fight between Manny Pacquiao and Juan Manuel Marquez.</p><p>Romney also visited with Pacquiao in his dressing room before the fight, wishing him well in the bout.</p><p>''Hello Manny. I ran for president. I lost,'' Romney told the fighter, according to Pacquiao publicist Fred Sternburg.</p><p>Pacquiao is a congressman in the Philippines, and has said previously he might run one day for the president of his country.</p><p>Romney and his wife, Ann, were guests of Nevada State Athletic Commission chairman Bill Brady at the fight at the MGM Grand hotel arena. Brady hosted a fundraiser for Romney during the presidential campaign.</p><p>The Romneys arrived during the undercard, drawing little reaction from the crowd.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/mitt_and_anns_fight_night/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/mitt_and_anns_fight_night/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 groups who shouldn&#8217;t be able to vote, according to Ted Nugent</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/5_groups_who_shouldnt_be_able_to_vote_according_to_ted_nugent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/5_groups_who_shouldnt_be_able_to_vote_according_to_ted_nugent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 19:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Nugent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[veterans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fossil fuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13117283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Veterans, churchgoers and homeowners are just a few of the demented rocker's targets]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> The American right has so embraced the “makers versus takers” narrative (<a href="http://www.alternet.org/election-2012/big-fat-lie-behind-romneys-absurd-47-argument">entirely false from the get-go</a>) that despite a lot of talk about soul-searching and trying to reach out to people who aren't old, white and angry, they're having a hard time keeping their true feelings from the public.</p><p>Washed-up, draft-dodging '70s rocker Ted Nugent has never tried to obscure his extremism, and this week he offered an idea that is supposedly related to a budget deal. After exposing his impressive ignorance of the federal budget, especially “entitlements," Nugent offered up <a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/2012/12/04/ted-nugents-budget-deal-suspend-vote-for-welfar/191666">a modest proposal</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Let's also stop the insanity by suspending the right to vote of any American who is on welfare. Once they get off welfare and are self-sustaining, they get their right to vote restored. No American on welfare should have the right to vote for tax increases on those Americans who are working and paying taxes to support them. That's insane.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/5_groups_who_shouldnt_be_able_to_vote_according_to_ted_nugent/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/5_groups_who_shouldnt_be_able_to_vote_according_to_ted_nugent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mr. Burns issues PSA explaining the &#8220;fiscal cliff&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/mr_burns_issues_psa_explaining_the_fiscal_cliff/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/mr_burns_issues_psa_explaining_the_fiscal_cliff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 21:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[montgomery burns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Simpsons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13114686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["The Simpsons's" number one Romney supporter says that "rich people feel things more deeply than the common man"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While awaiting a call from Karl Rove, "<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&amp;v=c91usT4P1u0">The Simpsons</a>" rich villain Montgomery Burns explains the fiscal cliff in terms us commoners will understand: "Think of the economy as a car and the rich man as the driver. If you don't give the driver all the money, he will drive you over a cliff. It's just common sense."</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/c91usT4P1u0" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/mr_burns_issues_psa_explaining_the_fiscal_cliff/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/mr_burns_issues_psa_explaining_the_fiscal_cliff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How not to &#8220;evolve&#8221; on immigration</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/how_not_to_evolve_on_immigration/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/how_not_to_evolve_on_immigration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 18:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future of GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13114406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest remarks of Mitt Romney's campaign manager only underscore the callousness of Republican policy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the Republican Party licks its wounds from last month’s election and decides where to go from here, moderating on immigration has emerged as the top priority. The goal is to appeal to Hispanic voters, but if the move is a purely political ploy instead of earnest shift in thinking, then Republicans risk turning off the very group they are trying to appeal to. So they have to convince Hispanics that they've seen the light and are a ready to change.</p><p>This, however, won't help. At a conference of senior aides from both campaigns organized by the Harvard University Institute of Politics, Mitt Romney campaign manager Matt Rhoades tried to execute the shift, but gave away the game in the process. He said he regrets letting Romney move so far to the right on immigration, not because it was bad policy, but because it ended up being a tactical mistake. <a href="http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/12/03/romney-campaign-manager-says-he-regrets-immigration-stance/">Jeff Zeleny reports</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/how_not_to_evolve_on_immigration/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/how_not_to_evolve_on_immigration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dear Barack: Stop terrorizing the planet</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/dear_barack_stop_terrorizing_the_planet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/dear_barack_stop_terrorizing_the_planet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 15:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TomDispatch.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mali]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13114254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An open letter to the president to end his lethal -- and ever-expanding -- drone wars]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Barack Obama<br /> The White House<br /> 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW<br /> Washington, D.C. 20500</p><p>Dear President Obama,</p><p>Nothing you don’t know, but let me just say it: the world’s a weird place. In my younger years, I might have said “crazy,” but that was back when I thought being crazy was a cool thing and only regretted I wasn’t.</p><p>I mean, do you ever think about how you ended up where you are? And I'm not actually talking about the Oval Office, though <em>that’s</em> undoubtedly a weird enough story in its own right.</p><p>After all, you were a community organizer and a constitutional law professor and now, if you stop to think about it, here’s where you’ve ended up: you’re using robots to <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175551/engelhardt_assassin-in-chief" target="_blank">assassinate</a> people you personally pick as targets.  You’ve overseen and escalated off-the-books robot air wars in <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/may/29/americas-drone-campaign-terror" target="_blank">Pakistan</a>, <a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/08/somalia-drones/all/" target="_blank">Somalia</a>, and <a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/09/yemen-drone-war/" target="_blank">Yemen</a>, and are evidently considering <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/white-house-secret-meetings-examine-al-qaeda-threat-in-north-africa/2012/10/01/f485b9d2-0bdc-11e2-bd1a-b868e65d57eb_story.html" target="_blank">expanding them</a> to Mali and maybe even <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/ondeadline/2012/10/15/libya-drones-special-forces-al-qaeda/1635181/" target="_blank">Libya</a>.  You’ve employed what will someday be defined as a weapon of mass destruction, launching history’s first <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/blog/175607/karen_greenberg_a_digital_9.11" target="_blank">genuine cyberwar</a> against a country that isn’t threatening to attack us.  You’ve agreed to the surveillance of <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175524/engelhardt_datamining_you" target="_blank">more Americans</a> every which way from Sunday than have ever been listened in on or (given emailing, texting, and tweeting) read.  You came into office proclaiming a “<a href="http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20090121/index.htm" target="_blank">sunshine</a>” policy and yet your administration has classified more documents (<a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/blog/175570/engelhardt_that_makes_no_sense" target="_blank">92,064,862</a> in 2011) than any other in our history.  Despite <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2012/11/president-obama-signs-law-upgrading-whistleblower-protections" target="_blank">signing</a> a Whistleblower Enhancement Protection Act, you’ve <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/archive/175500/peter_van_buren_fear_the_silence" target="_blank">used</a> the Espionage Act on more government whistleblowers and leakers than all previous administrations combined, and yet your officials continue to <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/29/world/obamas-leadership-in-war-on-al-qaeda.html" target="_blank">leak</a> secret material they see as advantageous to the White House without fear of prosecution.  Though you <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175057/ira_chernus_gwot_rip" target="_blank">deep-sixed</a> the Bush administration name for it -- “the Global War on Terror” (ridding the world of GWOT, one of the worst acronyms ever) -- you’ve accepted the idea that we are “at war” with terror and on a “global battlefield” which (see above) you’re actually expanding.  You’re <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/some-guantanamo-bay-detainees-names-disclosed/2012/09/21/e3611e76-0434-11e2-8102-ebee9c66e190_story.html" target="_blank">still keeping</a> uncharged, untried prisoners of not-quite-war in an offshore military prison camp of injustice that, on the day you came into office, you <a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/203727-obama-promise-to-close-prison-at-guantanamo-still-unfulfilled" target="_blank">promised</a> to close within a year.  You’re overseeing planning that, according to recent reports, will continue the Afghan War in some form until at least <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/26/world/asia/us-planning-a-force-to-stay-in-afghanistan.html" target="_blank">2017</a> or possibly <a href="http://news.antiwar.com/2012/11/29/panetta-us-will-battle-al-qaeda-in-afghanistan-for-years-to-come/" target="_blank">well beyond</a>.  You preside over an administration that has encouraged the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-blurring-of-cia-and-military/2011/05/31/AGsLhkGH_story.html" target="_blank">further militarization</a> of the CIA (to which you <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/28/petraeus_13/" target="_blank">appointed</a> as director not a civilian but a four-star general you assumedly wanted to tuck safely away during campaign season).  You’ve overseen the further <a href="http://wemeantwell.com/blog/2012/08/13/the-militarization-of-the-state-department/" target="_blank">militarization</a> of the State Department; you’ve encouraged a <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175426/nick_turse_a_secret_war_in_120_countries" target="_blank">major expansion</a> of the <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/archive/175547/andrew_bacevich_the_golden_age_of_special_operations" target="_blank">special operations forces</a> and its secret presidential army, the Joint Special Operations Command, cocooned inside the U.S. military/  You’ve overseen the further post-9/11 expansion of an already <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/blog/175545/" target="_blank">staggering</a> national security budget and the further growth of our labyrinthine “Intelligence Community” -- and though who remembers anymore, you even won what must have been the first <em>prospective</em> Nobel Prize for Peace more or less before you did a damn thing, and then thanked the Nobel Committee with a <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-bromwich/barack-obamas-oslo-speech_b_389791.html" target="_blank">full-throated defense</a> of the right of the U.S. to do what it pleased, militarily, on the planet! And if that isn’t a weird legacy-in-formation, what is?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/dear_barack_stop_terrorizing_the_planet/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/dear_barack_stop_terrorizing_the_planet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mitt Romney&#8217;s bored, eating Boston Market, playing jokes</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/02/mitt_romneys_bored_eating_boston_market_playing_practical_jokes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/02/mitt_romneys_bored_eating_boston_market_playing_practical_jokes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2012 05:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ann Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Market]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13112587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A behind-the-scenes story in the Washington Post lays out the sadness inside Mitt's home since he lost the election]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what's Mitt Romney been up to for the last month? We all know he's <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/post_election_mitt_romney_is_just_your_average_guy/">pumped some gas, visited Disneyland, caught "Twilight"</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/caption_contest_obama_and_romneys_lunch_date/">shared white turkey chili and Southwest chicken salad with President Obama.</a></p><p>But a <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/a-detached-romney-tends-wounds-in-seclusion-after-failed-white-house-bid/2012/12/01/4305079a-38a9-11e2-8a97-363b0f9a0ab3_story.html?hpid=z1">definitive Washington Post piece today</a> has more details from inside the Romney home in La Jolla, Calif.</p><p>According to the Post, Romney watches the news about the "fiscal cliff," wonders "what if?" and doesn't know what to do with himself.</p><blockquote><p>Four weeks after losing a presidential election he was convinced he would win, Romney’s rapid retreat into seclusion has been marked by repressed emotions, second-guessing and, perhaps for the first time in the overachiever’s adult life, sustained boredom.</p></blockquote><p>Other details from the story:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/02/mitt_romneys_bored_eating_boston_market_playing_practical_jokes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/02/mitt_romneys_bored_eating_boston_market_playing_practical_jokes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>96</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the right-wing media bubble impenetrable?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/01/is_the_right_wing_media_bubble_impenetrable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/01/is_the_right_wing_media_bubble_impenetrable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2012 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grover Norquist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13112222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nearly a month after their blow-out defeat, Republicans still refuse to confront their demographic challenges]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Republicans are responding to their recent losses not by moderating their rhetoric or rethinking their policy preferences, but by retreating deeper into the conservative bubble -- and hardening it lest any objective reality intrude.</p><p>In the <em>Wall Street Journal</em>, William McGurn <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324469304578143344246556774.html">approached the idea</a> that villifying half the country as lazy “takers” dependent on the largesse of the makers may not be a way to win over the masses. He wrote, “Maybe Americans who have reason to feel insecure about their futures don't find a government that promises to be there for them when they need it all that menacing.” But he then rejects the notion and calls for better propaganda. “Conservatives' top priority,” he writes, “should be promoting an alternative—that in a highly competitive, global economy, the only real economic security for ordinary Americans is the security of opportunity.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/01/is_the_right_wing_media_bubble_impenetrable/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/01/is_the_right_wing_media_bubble_impenetrable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>86</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jason Sudeikis: Mitt Romney sounds like a black comic imitating a white guy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/jason_sudeikis_mitt_romney_sounds_like_a_black_comic_imitating_a_white_guy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/jason_sudeikis_mitt_romney_sounds_like_a_black_comic_imitating_a_white_guy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jason sudeikis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meet the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SNL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fred armisen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13111415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The "SNL" star made appearances on "Conan" and "Meet the Press," where he was joined by co-star Fred Armisen]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On last night's "<a href="http://teamcoco.com/video/jason-sudeikis-tips-on-playing-mitt-romney">Conan</a>," "SNL" star Jason Sudeikis, who played both <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/jason_sudeikis_discusses_playing_romney_and_biden_on_snl/">Mitt Romney and Joe Biden</a> on the late night sketch show, said Mitt Romney's voice sounds basically like "when black stand-ups do a white guy voice":</p><p><iframe src="http://teamcoco.com/embed/v/43902" frameborder="0" width="420" height="305"></iframe></p><p>O'Brien referenced today's clip of the comic on <a href="http://video.msnbc.msn.com/meet-the-press/47182549#47182549">"Meet the Press's" Press Pass series</a>, in which Sudeikis discussed the relationship between politics and comedy with co-star Fred Armisen, who played Barack Obama on SNL. Sudeikis called Romney disappointingly corny, saying, "That's us wishing he was aware of how corny he is. ... He is as bland as bland can be, at this point. He's like a butter sandwich. Unsalted butter. With the crusts cut off."</p><p>Watch the full discussion with David Gregory, below:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/jason_sudeikis_mitt_romney_sounds_like_a_black_comic_imitating_a_white_guy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/jason_sudeikis_mitt_romney_sounds_like_a_black_comic_imitating_a_white_guy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does anyone want Medicare cuts?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/does_anyone_want_medicare_cuts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/does_anyone_want_medicare_cuts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 16:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Prospect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13111230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new poll reveals that 68 percent of conservatives oppose slicing the health care program for seniors]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.prospect.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/10/TAP_new_logo6.png" alt="The American Prospect" align="left" /></a> One of the more interesting results in yesterday’s <em>Washington Post</em>/ABC News <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/polling/postabc-poll-support-reducing-nations-budget/2012/11/28/083a0a26-3952-11e2-9258-ac7c78d5c680_page.html">poll</a>, as the <em>Post</em>'s Greg Sargent <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/post/the-morning-plum-can-obama-change-washington-from-the-outside/2012/11/28/3e636eec-394f-11e2-b01f-5f55b193f58f_blog.html">alluded</a> to this morning, is the overwhelming opposition to Medicare cuts from Republican voters. Sixty-eight percent of self-identified Republicans—and 68 percent of self-identified <em>conservatives</em>—oppose cuts to the health-care program for seniors.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/does_anyone_want_medicare_cuts/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/does_anyone_want_medicare_cuts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>