<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Mitt Romney</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/mitt_romney/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 15:08:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>House GOPer: Romney was the kid who couldn&#8217;t explain his science project</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/house_goper_romney_was_the_kid_who_couldnt_explain_his_science_project/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/house_goper_romney_was_the_kid_who_couldnt_explain_his_science_project/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 21:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pete Sessions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13288073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rep. Pete Sessions has a theory about why Mitt Romney lost the election ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Pete Sessions, R-Texas, doesn't think that the Republican party really needs to rebrand - it just needs to pick better candidates. “We are winning when we have good candidates,” he told <a href="http://frontburner.dmagazine.com/2013/05/01/pete-sessions-likens-mitt-romney-to-a-kid-who-couldnt-explain-his-science-project/">D Magazine</a>. “We lose when we have bad candidates.”</p><p>He continued that Mitt Romney in particular was one of those bad candidates. “Mitt Romney appeared like a kid who showed up for his science project and the teacher said, ‘Explain it,’ and Mitt couldn’t do it,” Sessions said. “His ‘dad,’ Paul Ryan, explained it to him, but Mitt didn’t get it. … That’s why we lost the last election.”</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/house_goper_romney_was_the_kid_who_couldnt_explain_his_science_project/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/house_goper_romney_was_the_kid_who_couldnt_explain_his_science_project/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Millennials are now the Crash Generation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/millenials_are_now_the_crash_generation_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/millenials_are_now_the_crash_generation_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Next New Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vietnam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13285664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twenty-somethings coming of age today will be forever shaped by the country's economic recession]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nextnewdeal.net/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/04/next-new-deal-logo_resize.png" alt="Next New Deal" /></a> The economy is personal. It colors our decisions about everything: when to have kids, what city to move to, who to vote for, who to sleep with. And nobody knows this better than the biggest generation in history: the Millennials. These 80 million Americans have come of age during the worst economic recession since the Depression, an experience that will have profound repercussions on our lives—and our political consciousness.</p><p>I call us the Crash Generation. For many of us in our twenties, 2008 was a period awash in exhilarating highs and terrifying lows. The words “depression,” “economic crisis,” “mass layoffs,” and “foreclosures,” along with “hope,” “change,” and “Obama,” all clogged the headlines and made their way into whiskey-fueled party conversations. Washington and the media had never been so frank about the cataclysmic proportions of a financial crash. And a candidate had never kicked young voters into such high gear like Barack Obama, who seemed to reflect the seismic demographic shift our generation was heralding. The mythic American dream-bubbles were bursting for young people at the exact moment we had begun to wield our political influence. That second half of 2008 was our JFK assassination. Our Vietnam. Our Great Depression.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/millenials_are_now_the_crash_generation_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/millenials_are_now_the_crash_generation_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to interpret Kirsten Gillibrand&#8217;s political opportunism</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/how_to_interpret_kirsten_gillibrands_political_opportunism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/how_to_interpret_kirsten_gillibrands_political_opportunism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kirsten Gillibrand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rape in the military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13284867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The skilled, potential presidential candidate has changed many of her positions. But do the ends justify the means?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You're not allowed, it seems, to write an article about New York Sen. and possible presidential hopeful Kirsten Gillibrand without comparing her to Tracy Flick (Politico yesterday dutifully <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/04/kirsten-gillibrand-run-for-president-90706.html">observed</a> the tradition). Yes, Gillibrand is ambitious, female and blonde and has been said to have sharp elbows -- it's taken less than that to trot out the "Election" protagonist before -- but there may be a more interesting comparison here: Mitt Romney.</p><p>When Gillibrand -- a hot topic in political circles this week, as a potential liberal <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/04/kirsten-gillibrand-run-for-president-90706.html">presidential candidate</a> and a champion for <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/senate_takes_steps_to_reduce_sexual_violence_in_the_military/">addressing sexual assault in the military</a> -- was appointed to Hillary Clinton's Senate seat in 2009, Nate Silver <a href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/01/is-kennedys-loss-conservatives-gain.html">wrote</a>, "This is not a terrific outcome for progressive Democrats," because "Gillibrand, statistically speaking, has been one of the more conservative Democrats in the House. Moreover, she is a somewhat proud conservative, being a member of the Blue Dog caucus. In a state like New York, which is capable of electing and re-electing a very liberal senator, that’s a somewhat underachieving result for the Democrats."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/how_to_interpret_kirsten_gillibrands_political_opportunism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/how_to_interpret_kirsten_gillibrands_political_opportunism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Former Ryan campaign intern charged with nude picture blackmail scheme</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/former_ryan_campaign_intern_charged_with_nude_picture_blackmail_scheme/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/former_ryan_campaign_intern_charged_with_nude_picture_blackmail_scheme/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 13:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Savader]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13280652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adam Savader allegedly threatened to publish nude pictures of 15 women unless they sent him more pictures]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam Savader, a former campaign intern to Paul Ryan and Newt Gingrich, was arrested and charged with "Internet extortion and cyber stalking," for an alleged scheme to blackmail women with naked pictures of themselves.</p><p>From the FBI's <a href="http://www.fbi.gov/detroit/press-releases/2013/new-york-man-charged-with-internet-extortion-and-cyber-stalking">press release</a> on the arrest:</p><blockquote><p>According to the affidavit, from May 2012 through February 2013, Adam Paul Savader sent anonymous text messages using Google Voice numbers to 15 women stating that he had nude photographs of the women and threatening to distribute the nude photographs to the women’s friends and family members unless the women sent him more nude photographs of themselves. Savader sent some of the victims links to a photo-sharing website where nude pictures of the victims had been posted.</p></blockquote><p>From the <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/romney-campaign-intern-busted-nude-pics-blackmail-scheme-article-1.1325621">New York Daily News</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/former_ryan_campaign_intern_charged_with_nude_picture_blackmail_scheme/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/former_ryan_campaign_intern_charged_with_nude_picture_blackmail_scheme/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Director of Log Cabin Republicans: You can thank Mitt Romney for recent marriage equality gains</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/director_of_log_cabin_republicans_you_can_thank_mitt_romney_for_recent_marriage_equality_gains/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/director_of_log_cabin_republicans_you_can_thank_mitt_romney_for_recent_marriage_equality_gains/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 18:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Portman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13279829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gregory Angelo thinks Mitt Romney's 2012 defeat was a tipping point on gay marriage, not Barack Obama's reversal]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Barack Obama publicly backed marriage equality in May 2012, reaffirmed his position in his second inaugural address and had his administration file pro-gay marriage briefs in both the Prop 8 and Defense of Marriage Act Supreme Court cases. In the months since, politicians from both parties have come out in support of gay marriage, and many advocates view the president's reversal on equal marriage as a tipping point for other lawmakers, even among Republicans.</p><p>But not Gregory Angelo, the executive director of the Log Cabin Republicans. He credits Mitt Romney's tone-deaf position on these issues and his crushing defeat in the 2012 election for slowly (seriously slowly) bringing the GOP around to marriage equality, as he <a href="http://www.advocate.com/print-issue/current-issue/2013/04/22/whos-changing-gop-minds-marriage-mehlman-lcr-director-weigh" target="_blank">told</a> the Advocate:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/director_of_log_cabin_republicans_you_can_thank_mitt_romney_for_recent_marriage_equality_gains/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/director_of_log_cabin_republicans_you_can_thank_mitt_romney_for_recent_marriage_equality_gains/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are we too sensitive to &#8220;gaffes&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/are_we_too_sensitive_to_gaffes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/are_we_too_sensitive_to_gaffes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2013 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Irin Carmon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[92nd Street Y]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaffes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13269792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Irin Carmon on how verbal slip-ups often provide a glimpse at politicians' real opinions]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this video produced by <a href="http://www.92y.org/" target="_blank">92nd St Y</a>, Irin Carmon explains why so-called "gaffes" often deserve the scrutiny they receive from the media.<br /> <iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/qYz2j12wuXQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/are_we_too_sensitive_to_gaffes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/are_we_too_sensitive_to_gaffes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 tax dodges that help the rich get richer</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/10_tax_dodges_that_help_the_rich_get_richer_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/10_tax_dodges_that_help_the_rich_get_richer_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forbes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larry Ellison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13269108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How Mitt Romney stashed millions in a tax-free IRA, and other industry secrets]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you read about the <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2013/03/04/news/economy/buffett-secretary-taxes/index.html">billionaire who pays a lower income tax rate than his secretary</a> and gives advice for how much income tax other people ought to pay? You might want to ask: “How does he do it? ”</p><p>We don’t know the complete answer to that question. No doubt, only his army of tax advisers does. What we’d instead like to share are 10 ways the current tax code allows the rich to accumulate vast fortunes, subject to little or no tax. And, unlike the offshore account tax fraud that gets so much press and regulatory attention, many of the most egregious tax avoidance scams are perfectly legal.</p><p><strong>1. No income means no tax.</strong> Imagine two men living in the same town. Joe owns an oil exploration corporation. Pete, a geologist, works for Joe. Pete finds oil, billions of dollars worth, and when he does, Joe gives him a $1 million bonus.</p><p>Pete pays income taxes on $1 million and keeps looking for oil. Joe, the boss is now a billionaire. Although he has not sold any oil yet, the bank lends him money against the find and he builds a mansion, buys a nice car and lives it up. Even though Joe has become richer by billions of dollars, he pays no income tax. Why? He has no income.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/10_tax_dodges_that_help_the_rich_get_richer_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/10_tax_dodges_that_help_the_rich_get_richer_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s entitlement plan was four years in the making</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/obamas_entitlement_plan_was_four_years_in_the_making/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/obamas_entitlement_plan_was_four_years_in_the_making/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cutting social security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicaid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13268016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President’s desire to cut Social Security was public before he even took office. Why did so many turn a blind eye?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While many Democrats are expressing shock and outrage that President Obama, a Democrat, would propose to cut Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, the truth is they shouldn’t be surprised. Obama’s desire to make these cuts dates back at least four years – since before his presidency, even -- and has been largely in plain view. We just chose to willfully ignore it, and pretend it wasn’t true.</p><p>Obama didn’t talk about it when he first campaigned for the job -- if he had, he surely wouldn’t have won the Democratic nomination, and may not even have beaten John McCain, since not even Republican presidential candidates publicly campaign to weaken what their party calls “entitlements.” Everyone sensibly had assumed that no Democrat would want to weaken or reduce the crowning achievements of Democratic Presidents Franklin Roosevelt and Lyndon Johnson, not to mention of the Democratic Party itself. But immediately after getting elected, Barack Obama admitted he wanted to do just that.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/obamas_entitlement_plan_was_four_years_in_the_making/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/obamas_entitlement_plan_was_four_years_in_the_making/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Best of the Salon limerick contest</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/best_of_the_salon_limerick_contest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/best_of_the_salon_limerick_contest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salon limerick contest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salon Limerick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poetry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers and Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seamus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seamus the dog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rafalca]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13263264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part 1: The election]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p dir="ltr">in the first compilation of the Salon limerick contest, here are the best reader submitted limericks from the election:</p><p dir="ltr">As travel arrangements were set,</p><p dir="ltr">Rafalca had reason to fret,</p><p dir="ltr">When Romney explained,</p><p dir="ltr">To get to the Games,</p><p dir="ltr">She'd be strapped to the roof of the jet!</p><p dir="ltr">Pete DeVriese</p><p dir="ltr">Oakland, Calif.</p><p><strong><strong><br /> </strong></strong></p><p dir="ltr">The Romney's were off with a start.</p><p dir="ltr">Regrettably, Seamus had farts.</p><p dir="ltr">So into the crate,</p><p dir="ltr">If he makes it that's great.</p><p dir="ltr">If not, Mitt will sell off the parts.</p><p dir="ltr">Michael Peterson</p><p dir="ltr">Willowbrook, Ill.</p><p><strong><strong><br /> </strong></strong></p><p dir="ltr">Mitt’s not vulgar, profane or salacious.</p><p dir="ltr">He would never offend! Good gracious!</p><p dir="ltr">But in unctuous perfection,</p><p dir="ltr">He seeks his election,</p><p dir="ltr">In a manner sublimely mendacious.</p><p dir="ltr">Quentin Sullivan</p><p dir="ltr">Haverhill, Mass.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p dir="ltr">Paul Ryan is sure that it's true.</p><p dir="ltr">All abortions are wicked to do.</p><p dir="ltr">Not for rape, or incest,</p><p dir="ltr">Even death - Paul knows best.</p><p dir="ltr">For a zygote's worth much more than you.</p><p dir="ltr">Paul Bamborough</p><p dir="ltr">Norway</p><p><strong><strong><br /> </strong></strong></p><p dir="ltr">RNC speakers begin to assemble,</p><p dir="ltr">And their rhetoric starts to dissemble.</p><p dir="ltr">From Rubio to Ryan.</p><p dir="ltr">There'll be no shortage of lyin'.</p><p dir="ltr">Causing fact-checkers all over to tremble.</p><p dir="ltr">Jim Brown</p><p dir="ltr">Scarsdale, N.Y.</p><p><strong><strong><br /> </strong></strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/best_of_the_salon_limerick_contest/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/best_of_the_salon_limerick_contest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gingrich and Santorum almost formed &#8220;Unity Ticket&#8221; in 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/gingrich_and_santorum_almost_formed_unity_ticket_in_2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/gingrich_and_santorum_almost_formed_unity_ticket_in_2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 13:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13248910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The two presidential candidates secretly plotted to try to overtake Romney by pulling away conservative votes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the 2012 Republican primary, Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum were "close" to forming a "Unity Ticket" as a way to shore up conservative votes and crater support for Mitt Romney.</p><p>Josh Green from <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-03-22/the-secret-gingrich-santorum-unity-ticket-that-nearly-toppled-romney">Bloomberg Businessweek</a> reports:</p><blockquote><p>“We were close,” former Representative Bob Walker, a Gingrich ally, says. “Everybody thought there was an opportunity.” “It would have sent shock waves through the establishment and the Romney campaign,” says John Brabender, Santorum’s chief strategist.</p> <p>But the negotiations collapsed in acrimony because Gingrich and Santorum could not agree on who would get to be president. “In the end,” Gingrich says, “it was just too hard to negotiate.”</p></blockquote><p>“I was disappointed when Speaker Gingrich ultimately decided against this idea, because it could have changed the outcome of the primary,” Santorum told Green. “And more importantly, it could have changed the outcome of the general election.”</p><p>Read the full report <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-03-22/the-secret-gingrich-santorum-unity-ticket-that-nearly-toppled-romney">here</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/gingrich_and_santorum_almost_formed_unity_ticket_in_2012/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/gingrich_and_santorum_almost_formed_unity_ticket_in_2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How rich &#8220;moochers&#8221; hurt America</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/how_rich_moochers_ruin_america/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/how_rich_moochers_ruin_america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Makers vs. Takers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[makers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landlords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13248564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 3-point plan of wealthy landlords, lenders and insurance providers -- the true "takers" threatening the nation]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a previous <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/private_sector_parasites/">column</a> detailing the true "makers" and "takers" in America, I argued that the greatest threat to American capitalism today comes not from public taxation supporting public programs, but from “private taxation” in the form of excessive private “rents” that subsidize private sector parasites or “rentiers” (like landlords, lenders and providers of health insurance and healthcare). These excessive private taxes or rents are costs on productive enterprise that can be as crippling as excessive public taxation.</p><p>In American politics as in the American economy, power and wealth have shifted from the industrial capitalists of old to the “rent lords” of the early 21st century, based in the overgrown FIRE (finance, insurance, real estate) sector. The agenda of the new rentier oligarchy in the U.S. is quite different from that of traditional productive businesses. The Rentier Agenda consists of low taxes on rentiers, the privatization of infrastructure and social insurance, and a macroeconomic policy that favors creditors rather than debtors, including debtor businesses and debtor governments.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/how_rich_moochers_ruin_america/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/how_rich_moochers_ruin_america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Super PACs: Election season&#8217;s biggest scam</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/17/super_pacs_election_seasons_biggest_scam_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/17/super_pacs_election_seasons_biggest_scam_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Mar 2013 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ProPublica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super PACs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13243145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to new research, only a fraction of the millions collected was spent on getting candidates elected]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.propublica.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/12/Logo-e1354323738840.jpg" alt="ProPublica" /></a> In August 2008, as the right wing of the Republican Party grew increasingly disenchanted with the party’s direction, the men from Russo, Marsh and Associates sensed opportunity: They created a political action committee, Our Country Deserves Better, and in time launched the Tea Party Express.</p><p>Russo, Marsh—an established California outfit of Republican consultants—was just getting started. The firm formed a second political committee, this one with a pro-military agenda. And eventually, seizing on the President’s unpopularity in certain circles, they opened a third, the Campaign to Defeat Barack Obama.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/17/super_pacs_election_seasons_biggest_scam_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/17/super_pacs_election_seasons_biggest_scam_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP&#8217;s presidential front-runner: Not who you think</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/gops_presidential_front_runner_not_who_you_think/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/gops_presidential_front_runner_not_who_you_think/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpac 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeb Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George H.W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Dole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13242878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As 2016 speculation begins, don't believe the myth that GOP always picks the presidential candidate “next in line”]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All eyes this week are on the CPAC meeting of conservatives, a Beltway gathering that will produce the first straw poll of Republican presidential candidates of the 2016 cycle. (Hey, we’re under three years to the Iowa caucuses now!) But the wiseguy reaction should come soon: All of the jockeying for position is irrelevant, because everybody knows that Republicans always select the “next in line” candidate. For example, Micah Cohen <a href="http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/03/14/is-it-too-early-for-2016-polls/">claims</a> that Hillary Clinton may benefit from a next in line effect, and that it’s “a dynamic seen in several recent Republican primaries.”</p><p>It’s a myth.</p><p>But expect to see plenty of it. It was a widely circulated myth during the last cycle, and the nomination of Mitt Romney will surely entrench the myth even more. But still, it’s a myth.</p><p>Of course it is true that parties – all parties – are most likely to nominate a candidate who enters the fight as the clear leader. But if “next in line” is more than just a trite statement that strong candidates usually do well, then it doesn’t help to predict anything.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/gops_presidential_front_runner_not_who_you_think/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/gops_presidential_front_runner_not_who_you_think/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romney to GOP: &#8220;I’m sorry&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/romney_tells_cpac_i%e2%80%99m_sorry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/romney_tells_cpac_i%e2%80%99m_sorry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpac 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13242412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At DC confab, '12 nominee turned private equity exec tells conservatives he'll be their "co-worker" in the movement]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitt Romney has a long and unique relationship with CPAC. In 2007, the former Massachusetts governor was a star, winning the CPAC straw poll as the conservative alternative to the more moderate front-runner John McCain. A year later, Romney used the venue to make the surprise announcement that he was dropping out of the race. Conservative radio host Laura Ingraham, who was tasked with introducing him, said last week on her radio show that she was given just a minute or two to rewrite her speech.</p><p>In 2009, with the fiery Tea Party movement on the rise, a Yoda-like Romney <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0209/Romney_at_CPAC.html">warned</a> conservatives against giving in to anger; in 2010, as a slew of young politicians was about to be sent to Congress, Romney was <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0210/33161.html">well received</a> as a seasoned statesmen; in 2011, angling for the GOP nomination again, he tossed out <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/watercooler/2011/feb/11/mitt-romney-2011-cpac-speech/">right-wing red meat</a> about Saul Alinksy and socialism to keep Ricks Perry and Santorum at bay.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/romney_tells_cpac_i%e2%80%99m_sorry/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/romney_tells_cpac_i%e2%80%99m_sorry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trump to CPAC: Romney should have bragged about his wealth more</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/trump_to_cpac_romney_should_have_bragged_about_his_wealth_more/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/trump_to_cpac_romney_should_have_bragged_about_his_wealth_more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 13:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpac 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13230063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The reality TV star can't resist dropping names and discussing his bank account at the conservative confab]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“The problem with this country,” according to Donald Trump, is that the White House won’t take his money to replace its cut-rate dinner tent. Speaking at a lethargic morning session on day two of CPAC today, Trump said he was dismayed to see a state dinner being held in a tent on the White House lawn, so he wanted to help. He called up the White House -- “somebody I know very well, someone in a high position” -- and offered to build “the most beautiful ballroom there is in the country” to host state dinners, but they never took up his offer.</p><p>The anecdote was typical of a speech filled with name dropping and inscrutable allegories about Trump’s wealth and the problems with America.</p><p>“If Mitt Romney made one mistake,” Trump said of the 2012 election, “it’s that he didn’t talk enough about his success.” According to Trump, Romney -- the man who lost the election in part by being an out-of-touch patrician -- should have talked more about his money instead of playing “defense” on it.</p><p>Of course, Romney did “pretty well” in the money-making department, but it was nothing compared to what Trump made -- "$8 billion," he offered, apropos of nothing.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/trump_to_cpac_romney_should_have_bragged_about_his_wealth_more/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/trump_to_cpac_romney_should_have_bragged_about_his_wealth_more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romney likely loser, even without famous video</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/romney_was_a_loser_even_without_famous_video/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/romney_was_a_loser_even_without_famous_video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 20:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[47 percent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13228038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the bartender who shot the "47% video" reveals himself, here's why Romney was probably toast, with or without it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the anonymous bartender who taped the “47 percent video” set to <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/how_a_bartender_helped_decide_the_election/">reveal his identity tonight</a>, the popular consensus appears to remain that the recording did major damage to Romney’s bid. But now that the election is over and we’ve had a chance to analyze its dynamics and results, it looks like it did not have the effect everyone thought.</p><p>When the video was first released by Mother Jones magazine on Sept. 17, it produced a rare moment of unity among pundits of all stripes. Even conservatives criticized Romney or his campaign, such as the Wall Street Journal’s <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/peggynoonan/2012/09/18/time-for-an-intervention/">Peggy Noonan</a> (‘incompetent”) and the New York Times’ <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/18/opinion/brooks-thurston-howell-romney.html?_r=0">David Brooks</a> (“depressingly inept”). Other commentators simply declared the Romney campaign over within hours of the video’s release.</p><p>Bloomberg’s Josh Barro <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-09-17/today-mitt-romney-lost-the-election.html">wrote</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/romney_was_a_loser_even_without_famous_video/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/romney_was_a_loser_even_without_famous_video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How a bartender helped decide the election</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/how_a_bartender_helped_decide_the_election/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/how_a_bartender_helped_decide_the_election/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 03:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13227386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The man who filmed the 47 percent tape wished Mitt Romney had acknowledged his work]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Mitt Romney had taken a moment to thank the wait staff at a Boca Raton fundraiser last year, he may now be president, or at least could have removed one of his biggest obstacles to the White House: the so-called 47 percent tape that clouded the last two months of the race.</p><p>The anonymous person who filmed the tape turns out to be a bartender with a local catering company who is coming forward now that the election is over. He'll reveal his identity tomorrow in an hour-long interview on "The Ed Show" on MSNBC, but in an interview with the Huffington Post Tuesday night, he suggested that he was disappointed that Romney never thanked the wait staff, as Bill Clinton had years before at a different event the same bartender happened to staff. <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/12/how-bill-clinton-47-percent-filmmaker_n_2864711.html?1363142812">Ryan Grim and Jason Cherkis report</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Romney, of course, did not speak to any of the staff, bussers or waiters. He was late to the event, and rushed out. He told his dinner guests that the event was off the record, but never bothered to repeat the admonition to the people working there.</p> <p>One of them had brought along a Canon camera. He set it on the bar and hit the record button. The bartender said he never planned to distribute the video. But after Romney spoke, the man said he felt he had no choice.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/how_a_bartender_helped_decide_the_election/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/how_a_bartender_helped_decide_the_election/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>117</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mitt loves fluffernutter</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/tagg_romney_posts_mitts_birthday_pics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/tagg_romney_posts_mitts_birthday_pics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 17:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tagg Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ann Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13226842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In birthday photos posted by Tagg Romney, Mitt wears a birthday hat and enjoys cupcakes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tagg Romney posted these pictures of Mitt Romney on Instagram, in the process of celebrating his 66th birthday.</p><p>[embedtweet id="311526609322639360"]</p><p><a href="http://www.railrode.net/2013/03/12/tagg_romney_posts_mitts_birthday_pics/romney_birthday_2/" rel="attachment wp-att-13226862"><img src="http://media.salon.com/2013/03/romney-birthday1.jpg" alt="" title="romney birthday" width="603" height="298" class="size-full wp-image-13226862" /></a></p><p><a href="http://www.railrode.net/2013/03/12/tagg_romney_posts_mitts_birthday_pics/romney_fluffernutter_2/" rel="attachment wp-att-13226873"><img src="http://media.salon.com/2013/03/romney-fluffernutter1.jpg" alt="" title="romney fluffernutter" width="603" height="300" class="size-full wp-image-13226873" /></a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/tagg_romney_posts_mitts_birthday_pics/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/tagg_romney_posts_mitts_birthday_pics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The week in 10 pics</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/09/the_week_in_10_pics_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/09/the_week_in_10_pics_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slideshow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ann Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hugo Chavez]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13223036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Rand Paul's bladder-defying filibuster to the goofy "snowquester," a look at the images that defined the week]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[From Rand Paul's bladder-defying filibuster to the goofy "snowquester," a look at the images that defined the week]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/09/the_week_in_10_pics_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Memo to would-be candidates: Don&#8217;t write books</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/06/memo_to_would_be_candidates_dont_write_books/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/06/memo_to_would_be_candidates_dont_write_books/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 20:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeb Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13221070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeb Bush and Mitt Romney show how hard it is to write a campaign book that won't be a political headache]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeb Bush, the former governor of Florida and probably a future presidential candidate, signaled his presidential ambitions by publishing a big public policy book this month. The book is called "Immigration Wars: Forging an American Solution," and it has a small problem: It was totally out of step with where the Republican Party had moved on immigration by the time it was published. Jeb Bush, who had previously been on the corporate, "moderate" side of the issue, in favor of citizenship for currently undocumented immigrants, seems to have decided that he needed to move to the right to remain viable in a Republican presidential primary campaign, and so his book quite explicitly deems a path to citizenship unacceptable. Alas, it then very quickly became OK again for prominent Republicans to support comprehensive immigration reform, in between when Bush's ghostwriter wrote the book and when it was published. Now, Bush is on TV once again sounding open to citizenship, though he is forced to pretend that he is <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/05/jeb-bush-pathway-to-citzenship_n_2810746.html">"not smart enough"</a> to figure out an issue that he just ... published an entire book about.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/06/memo_to_would_be_candidates_dont_write_books/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/06/memo_to_would_be_candidates_dont_write_books/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>