Mitt Romney

Why is Mitt Romney like dog food?

Mike Huckabee knocks Mitt Romney by comparing him to bad dog food.

  • more
    • All Share Services

Another poll is out today, showing Mike Huckabee inching up on Mitt Romney among Republicans in an early voting state. This time, it’s Florida, the site of Wednesday’s GOP debate, which will vote on Jan. 29. It’s but a single data point — Huckabee 17 percent, Romney 12 percent — but it comes on the heels of consistent Huckabee gains on Romney in the national and Iowa polls. It’s not yet a crisis for Romney, who still holds a commanding lead in New Hampshire, but if these trends continue it surely will become one.

On Monday, in a media conference call with reporters, USA Today’s Susan Page asked Huckabee what he thought of Romney’s relative decline in several polls. The exchange is telling for two reasons: It displays the storytelling talents of Huckabee, the Baptist pastor, and it lays out in vibrant colors the worst fear of the big-spending Romney campaign.

PAGE: Given all the time and money he [Romney] has invested in his plan to win in Iowa and New Hampshire, why do you think his relative position is declining?

HUCKABEE: You know, Susan, there is an old story about a guy who opened a dog food company and he spent a lot of money, a lot of money. He got the best food nutritionist. He hired the best marketing people. He hired the best sales force that has ever been assembled. He was going to launch this dog food that was going to just take the market away. And after a couple of months, their sales were flat, things were declining, they couldn’t figure it out. So he called all his people together, and he said, “Folks, we’ve got to figure this out. Who’s got the best formula that’s ever been scientifically developed?”

They said, “Well, we do, sir.” And he said, “Well who’s got the most ingenious marketing plan that has ever been come up with?” They said, “Well, we do, sir.” And he said, “Who has the greatest logistical process of the distribution of the product?” They said, “Well, we do sir.” And he said, “Who has the best labeling?” “Well, we do sir.” “Well, if we’ve got all this stuff, then tell me. How come it is that we are not doing better out there in the market?” There was a long silence. And then finally somebody in the back of the room said, “Because the dogs won’t eat the darn stuff, sir.”

And, Susan, I think the issue is that you can hire all the consultants in the world. You can spend a lot of money. You can market. You can buy more television, so much so that you own the top 500 feet of every television tower in Iowa and New Hampshire and South Carolina. But the voters ultimately have to believe that the product is what they want. And it’s obvious that there is a limit on how much that you can market and how much has to just really come from people’s commitments to believe that it’s the real deal.

Michael Scherer is Salon's Washington correspondent. Read his other articles here.

Romney’s not-so-clarifying clarification

He isn't disputing that he said there are too few Muslims to justify a Cabinet position.

  • more
    • All Share Services

Feeling some heat for saying that the low number of Muslims in the U.S. population means that appointing a Muslim to his Cabinet wouldn’t be “justified,” Mitt Romney tried today to clarify the question he’d been asked — but he’s still not disputing that he said what he said in response.

As we noted earlier today, Mansoor Ijaz writes in the Christian Science Monitor that he asked Romney recently whether he would “consider including qualified Americans of the Islamic faith in his cabinet as advisers on national security matters.” Romney’s response: “Based on the numbers of American Muslims [as a percentage] in our population, I cannot see that a cabinet position would be justified. But of course, I would imagine that Muslims could serve at lower levels of my administration.”

At a press availability today, Romney was asked about what seemed like a quota system for Cabinet positions. He answered by saying that Ijaz had misrepresented the question he’d asked him: “His question was, ‘Did I need to have a Muslim in my cabinet to be able to confront radical Jihad and would it be important to have a Muslim in my cabinet,’ and I said, ‘No, I don’t think that you have to have a Muslim in the cabinet to be able to take on radical Jihad any more than during the Second World War we needed to have a Japanese-American to understand the threat that was coming from Japan or something of that nature.’”

Romney said he “just rejected that argument, number one, and then number two, I point out that people who would be part of my cabinet is something that I really haven’t given a lot of thought to at this point, but I don’t have boxes that I check off as to their ethnicity. It’s not that I have to have a certain number of each different ethnic group; instead I would choose people based upon their merits and their capabilities.”

So did you hear Romney denying that he said that Muslims are too small a percentage of the population to justify a Cabinet position?

No, we didn’t either.

We just asked Romney campaign spokesman Kevin Madden for further clarification: “Is Romney denying that he said ‘based on the numbers of American Muslims [as a percentage] in our population, I cannot see that a cabinet position would be justified.’ Or is he just disputing the characterization of the question that was asked of him?”

Madden’s e-mailed response: “Disputing the characterization.”

In a follow-up e-mail, we asked Madden what percentage of the population a religious group must represent before Romney believes a Cabinet position is “justified.” We’ll let you know when we get a response.

Continue Reading Close

Tim Grieve is a senior writer and the author of Salon's War Room blog.

Mitt Romney’s Cabinet math?

We've come a long way from "a black, a woman, two Jews and a cripple." Or have we?

  • more
    • All Share Services

Mitt Romney was reportedly asked the other day whether, as president, he’d consider naming a “qualified American of the Islamic faith.” He said no.

“Based on the numbers of American Muslims … in our population, I cannot see that a cabinet position would be justified,” the Christian Science Monitor quotes Romney as saying. “But, of course, I would imagine that Muslims could serve at lower levels of my administration.”

Now, we weren’t aware that Cabinet positions were supposed to be doled out proportionally by religious faith or other demographic qualifiers — especially when the doling is done by representatives of a party that so often claims to eschew quotas and set-asides.

But now that we know, we’re trying to get ourselves up to speed. It turns out that there are 16 members in a president’s Cabinet — the vice president plus the heads of 15 executive departments — which means that each individual member represents 6.2 percent of the Cabinet.

According to the 2001 American Religious Identification Survey, 76.5 percent of Americans identify themselves as some kind of Christian. Under Romney’s logic, that means Christians should get about 12 seats in the next president’s Cabinet. Catholics get about four of those seats; Baptists gets two or three; Methodists get one and maybe two if we lump them together with the Lutherans. The Presbyterians could get a seat, but only if they shared it with the Episcopalians and the Pentacostals.

If Romney said what he’s said to have said, he’s certainly right about the Muslims, of course: At just 0.5 percent of the U.S. population, they’re not numerically entitled to a seat in the president’s Cabinet.

But the Romney campaign is now suggesting that maybe Romney didn’t say what he’s said to have said or wasn’t asked what the Monitor says he was asked. As the National Review reports, the campaign isn’t saying that the Monitor’s account is false, exactly — it doesn’t have a recording of the conversation — but that what Romney actually believes is that you should “fill responsibilities based upon people’s merit and their skill.”

And no wonder. If the next president were to fill Cabinet seats based on religious demographics, neither Jews nor Mormons, at 1.3 percent of the population each, would have any chance of getting a seat in the room.

Continue Reading Close

Tim Grieve is a senior writer and the author of Salon's War Room blog.

The Huckabee surge

He's gaining ground fast on Romney in Iowa, but will it be enough?

  • more
    • All Share Services

A day after putting some wind in the sails of Barack Obama, the Washington Post-ABC News Poll out today offers some big pre-holiday momentum to Mike Huckabee.

The good news for the former Arkansas governor: “Huckabee has tripled his support in Iowa since late July, eclipsing former New York Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani, former Sen. Fred D. Thompson and Sen. John McCain.”

The bad news for the former Arkansas governor: He’s still four statistically insignificant points behind former Massachusetts Gov. Mit Romney, and the Post-ABC pollsters find signs that it’s going to be hard for Huckabee to expand his support in Iowa much further.

Not surprisingly, much of Huckabee’s Iowa support comes from the GOP’s hard-right Christian base. The Post says that almost 70 percent of Iowans who say they’re supporting Huckabee are evangelical Protestants, and three-quarters of the Huckabeeans say they go to church at least once a week. Romney gets support from a broader cross-section of Republican voters, and Iowa Republicans are more likely to think of him as a “strong leader” with the right experience to be president.

The overall Iowa picture at the moment? Romney leads with the support of 28 percent of would-be Iowa caucus goers, followed by Huckabee at 24 percent, Thompson at 15 percent, Giuliani at 13 percent and McCain and Texas Rep. Ron Paul tied at 6 percent each.

Continue Reading Close

Tim Grieve is a senior writer and the author of Salon's War Room blog.

Who, me? Couldn’t be

Who's making those anti-Romney calls? A whodunit from the party of personal responsibility.

  • more
    • All Share Services

“Let me be perfectly clear: Our campaign was not and is not involved with any efforts to engage in alleged push polling calls against our own candidate.”

That’s Mitt Romney spokesman Kevin Madden, responding to suggestions that the Romney campaign is trying to drum up sympathy for the candidate by orchestrating telephone calls that raise questions about Romney’s religious faith.

According to the Associated Press, residents of Iowa and New Hampshire who’ve received the calls were asked if they know that Romney is a Mormon, that he received a draft deferment while on a Mormon mission in France, that the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints didn’t accept blacks as bishops until the 1970s, and that Mormons believe the Book of Mormon is superior to the Bible.

The calls have been traced to Washington Wats, a Utah-based company with a number of Romey campaign contributors on its payroll — facts that, among others, have led everyone from the Huffington Post to the National Review to posit that Romney’s campaign is behind the calls.

If Madden’s denial takes Team Romney out of the picture — maybe, maybe not — who else could be behind the calls? The calls cite John McCain’s military service, leading some to point the finger at his campaign. McCain says he’s not involved, and one of his advisors suggests that the calls are the handiwork of some other GOP candidate. Western Wats has said that Rudy Giuliani’s pollster — an early suspect — wasn’t involved but won’t say more except that the company doesn’t do push polling. Fred Thompson has called the calls “robo-dialing bigotry,” which is half right — the calls are being made by live human beings. In addition to Romney, the National Review has suggested that the culprit is “somebody with deep pockets, a relatively new desire to play in the political game, and little concern about long-term relationships in the GOP,” or, in the alternative, DailyKos.

So who really did it? We haven’t the slightest idea, but we can’t say we’re not enjoying the show. Our favorite scene so far? This pot-calling-the-kettle moment from Chris LaCivita, who served as chief strategist for the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth in 2004 before going on to advise Sen. George Allen in his unsuccessful 2006 Senate race: “I can’t imagine a presidential campaign sanctioning that type of effort. If they were, then they are the biggest bunch of dumbasses, and they have no business being involved at this level of politics.”

Continue Reading Close

Tim Grieve is a senior writer and the author of Salon's War Room blog.

America’s next top spouse

A guide to the brassy, opinionated, loud, difficult and plum-crazy partners on the arms of their president-running partners. Who says the campaign season is dull?

  • more
    • All Share Services

America's next top spouse

Presidential candidates, all too regularly, are people whose entire lives have been clipped and trimmed and buffed to meet polling specifications. But their spouses, their children, their siblings! If we’re lucky, these dapper power brokers are surrounded by far less perfect and conventional characters: blissfully untamed bohemians, wack-jobs or deliciously unreconstructed nogoodniks. When a candidate has a partner with texture, with flair — with an arrest record — there is the chance that she or he will leaven the weighty wonk of the endless campaign season. These rogue spouses have the potential to entertain us through the made-to-order claptrap of the debates, cheer us when we can’t bear to hear the word “Rasmussen” again.

Most important, the weirdest and most wonderful of them remind us that behind their mates’ pearly veneers and ill-tailored pantsuits lie the beating hearts of actual live human beings who once — possibly many moons ago, maybe at Shirley MacLaine’s house — abandoned their talking points and just plain fell in love.

Sadly, compelling stump marriages have historically been rare. Far too many contenders seem to have selected their better halves from the Political Helpmate Bin made available to eighth-grade boys who already know they want to be president. I often wondered if these guys were spirited away during gym class and presented with a kick line of apple-cheeked, god-fearing, pearl-wearing, cookie-baking girls willing to sacrifice independent thought, sensuality and their postgraduate education in service to the highest office.

But in recent decades, these cookie-cutter expectations have begun to change. (Thank you, Jesus, and Hugh and Dorothy Rodham for producing a child so desperately ill-suited for her wifely destiny.) In a post-Hillary universe, as the second wave and children of the second wave grow up and form more egalitarian partnerships, there are more brassy, opinionated, loud, difficult, plum-crazy partners on the arms of their front-running partners. Just consider that Clinton was the first first lady ever to have earned a postgraduate degree. But in recent years, the primary fields have been lousy with lawyers and doctors and professors.

In the 2004 election, the spousal uprising hit another peak with the rocking Dr. Judith Steinberg Dean, who caused much consternation by refusing to give up her job as a doctor and join her husband, Howard, on the campaign trail. Apparently, she felt that helping sick people might be a more vital commitment than addressing every bridge club in Cedar Rapids, Iowa.

And then — and I confess, my heart skips a beat just thinking about her — there was Teresa. Oh, Teresa. I still dream about you, in your scarves, with your abiding love for your long-dead husband, and at least one son who had become a Buddhist blacksmith of medieval armor and no longer spoke to you, and your tendency to tell reporters to “shove it.” You crazy old super-smart coot who was fluent in five languages, come back! Just don’t bring the husband with you! Sigh.

Political spouses: When they are good they are very, very good, and when they are bad they are awesome!

Of course, everyone loves to blame these colorful birds for the troubles their ill-fated partners encounter on the electoral market. But that’s face-saving hogwash. Terrible Teresa and Dr. Dean Medicine Woman didn’t sink their husbands’ candidacies; the boys took care of that just fine on their own. No, in addition to thrilling and entertaining us with their inappropriate behavior or unseemly show of intellect, nettlesome spouses also serve as a release valve for all the blame that frustrated campaigns and the media like to throw at anyone but the actual ham-fisted, saluting, yelping, straying, triangulating candidates. Realistically, no out-of-control spouse is actually going to sink a winning campaign. Unless, of course, he or she is a Vicodin-popping, intern-diddling, tongue-pierced, vegan puppy-killer! Bwahahahaha!

Welcome to the end of 2007. Before the field clears, let’s look at the brave man and women who’ve been hitting pancake breakfasts all over this great country of ours (or at least Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina), trying their damnedest to push their partners across the primary victory line so they can spend another year eating chili dogs in Ohio. Is there anyone with real Teresa potential out there? Might any of them become America’s next top spouse?

THE ALSO-RANS: I’m not saying these spouses are dull, but…

Barbara Flavin Richardson, wife of Gov. Bill Richardson: A New Englander (Concord, Mass.) transplanted to the Southwest, Richardson is an immensely likable figure who recently told a luncheon crowd in South Carolina about how whenever the presidential spouses are in the same place, they get separated by organizers, “like we’re going to get into a catfight or something.” Richardson, a graduate of Wheaton College, is committed to standard first lady causes like “Read Across America,” “Big Brothers/Big Sisters” and improving the childhood immunization record in her state, and she was instrumental in the establishment of New Mexico’s Office of Domestic Violence czar. She also brokered a deal in which Disney donated 20,000 Baby Einstein videos to low-income New Mexico families. These are all wonderful choices, but they do not put Richardson in hot contention in the race to be most scintillating political partner. She did offer a whisper of potential when she told the South Carolina lunch that when you’re married to a candidate, people are always coming up and telling you what “a wonderful man” your husband is. “Well, while Mr. Wonderful is out there campaigning, or doing whatever he does,” Richardson said, “the rest of us as spouses are still schlepping through the airport to get to the commercial plane with kids in tow, missing our connections, standing in line at the grocery store, just trying to keep body and soul and house and home and family together while they go out and make nice.” So it sounds like she’s already having a great time!

Dr. Jill Jacobs Biden, wife of Sen. Joe Biden: Jacobs married Biden 30 years ago, after the death of Biden’s first wife, Neilia Hunter, and their young daughter in an automobile accident. Together, the couple has raised Biden’s two sons from his first marriage and the daughter they have together. Biden is an English professor at Delaware Technical and Community College, about whom one of her students has eloquently written, “great teacher, straightforward and to the point. Very Smart. Dresses nicely.” MSNBC host Chris Matthews was even snazzier in his praise earlier this summer, when he opened an interview with Biden by calling her “the best-looking campaigner.” Stay classy, Chris!

Whitney Stewart Gravel, wife of Mike Gravel: It is very difficult to find any information at all about Whitney Stewart Gravel, except that she married Mike in the mid-1980s after his marriage to his first wife, Rita Jeanette Martin, ended. In 1958, his first wife was named Anchorage’s “Miss Fur Rendezvous,” an honor that would almost certainly have catapulted her to one of the more interesting categories in this story, except that she’s not married to him anymore.

Jackie Tancredo, wife of Rep. Tom Tancredo: Jackie met her husband in junior high school; they have two children and five grandchildren, and since her husband has discussed avoiding “the siren song of multiculturalism,” it’s pretty safe to say they’re all as white as the driven snow. Jackie is a pretty ideal political spouse, telling Time magazine that as first lady, when asked about her “signature issue,” that she feels “very strongly that child safety, whether it be physical safety in the school or protection from other predators such as those on the Internet, are vital to the well-being of our children.” But alas, when asked by Time if she would expect to have a say in presidential politics, she answered succinctly, “No.” Oh well. As conservative pundit Jane Chastain once wrote, in a column called “Run, Tom, Run!” Jackie’s husband has charisma that “fills a room and literally oozes out the doors and onto the street.” Literally oozes. Lucky, lucky Jackie.

Carolyn “Carol” Paul, wife of Rep. Ron Paul: She asked him out at a Sadie Hawkins dance in high school, and they were married in 1957. Carol has been a secretary at U.S. Steel in Pittsburgh, ran a dance school in the basement while Paul was doing his medical residency in obstetrics and gynecology, and has published cookbooks of family recipes that she posted on Paul’s congressional Web site for years. The couple has five children, 18 grandchildren and one great-grandchild. In a video called “The Ron Paul Story,” in which a narrator seems hell-bent on calling Paul a “baby doctor” (the “vajayjay” of obstetrics!), Carol made this creepy assertion: “Any other doctor can make you well, but the obstetrician actually gives you a present.” Awesome fact: Carol, 71, totally has a MySpace page. Where she lists her occupation as “General Manager of the Paul Family” and has 739 friends! Including this guy!

Lynne Layh Hunter, wife of Rep. Duncan Hunter: Lynne has been married to her husband for 34 years, and their son Duncan Duane is fighting in Afghanistan. This is another spouse about whom information is not plentiful, but she has helped her husband to put their son’s military service in the spotlight, suggesting at a recent speech, “This is a great country and we have to keep this country strong. And I think we need to let our military know that every time you see one of them at the airport and walking down the street…” Lynne has also suggested that “If we don’t keep this war over there, it’s gonna be right here in our own backyard.” She also got behind the border patrol agents convicted of shooting an unarmed, suspected Mexican drug dealer, telling a radio host that “it’s the most ridiculous thing that’s ever happened.”

EDGING CLOSER TO SCINTILLATING

Ann Romney, wife of Mitt Romney: Ann Romney is used to pressure. When she was a 16-year-old high school student, her boyfriend’s father, Gov. George Romney, gave the commencement address at his son’s prep school, and told the entire class, “If the girl you’re interested in doesn’t inspire you to greater effort than you would undertake without knowing her, then you’d better look around and get another.” Um, speaking for former 16-year-old girls everywhere: Eep? Also, the first time little Mitt went in for a kiss, the story goes, Ann cock-blocked him, asking instead, “What do Mormons believe?” Hot, hot, hot! But whatever he answered, it totally worked. Ann, the daughter of a lapsed Episcopalian, attended Brigham Young University, married Mitt, bore him five sons, and kept her trap shut the time he strapped the dog to the roof of the car! Fun fact: The Romneys held out till marriage (four years!) to get it on, a decision that has undergirded Ann’s enthusiasm for abstinence in her work with teenage girls. Ann suffers from multiple sclerosis. She’s also big into dressage. In the signs of life department, she gave $150 to Planned Parenthood in 1994, an inconvenient truth for her husband, who now opposes abortion. Though he didn’t used to.

Elizabeth Edwards, wife of John Edwards: Elizabeth has, from the start of this interminable campaign season, come off as almost unbearably smarter than her husband, the political spouse who really should be running herself. She grew up traveling the world with her military father, later getting her law degree from the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, where she met her pretty mate, to whom she has been married for 30 years and with whom she had four children. Their oldest son, Wade, died in a car accident in 1996, and she gave birth to Emma Claire at age 48 and Jack at 50. Elizabeth was diagnosed with breast cancer at the end of the 2004 presidential campaign, and waited to announce it until after the election. It has since returned, but she and her husband have continued their active presidential bid. Edwards was a high-powered lawyer until the death of her son, after which she retired from the full-time workforce. She’s also a serious liberal and feminist. But none of this has stopped her from taking a swipe at Hillary Clinton last year when she told a crowd that her choice to stay at home with her family has afforded her a happier life than Clinton has had. Edwards is a ballsy and vocal spouse, who openly disagrees with her husband on gay marriage, sensibly asserting, “I don’t know why someone else’s marriage has anything to do with me.” She provided America with a huge dose of wish fulfillment when she tore Ann Coulter a new one on national television. Edwards is also responsible for uttering the most inspiring, if slightly chilling, line of the campaign so far, telling a New York Times reporter after the announcement that her cancer was back that the most valuable lesson she could teach her children was how to “stand by themselves in a stiff wind.” Edwards is possibly the single biggest hard-ass on the entire 2008 presidential landscape.

Jackie Marie Clegg Dodd, wife of Chris Dodd: After the end of his first marriage, Chris Dodd dated Bianca Jagger and Carrie Fisher, so there is a good chance, based on historical precedent, laws of attraction, etc., that Jackie is eccentric. A Mormon (they are everywhere!) business consultant, Dodd was a political staffer who met her husband on the slopes after organizing a benefit ski event in Park City, Utah. “I don’t think Chris and I would ever have started dating if we had met in Washington where he was a senator and I was a lowly staffer,” she recently told a crowd. “But when we were on the ski slope, in Park City, everything was equal. Actually it wasn’t equal. He was a still a senator and I was still a lowly staffer but I knew how to ski and he didn’t know how to ski, so it became the great equalizer.” She has also said that they dated for almost 12 years “before rushing headlong into marriage.” That was eight years and two daughters ago.

Cindy Hensley McCain, married to John McCain: The daughter of beer distributors who still runs her parents’ huge company, Hensley and Co., Cindy married McCain, who is 18 years older than she, in 1980. Maine Republican Bill Cohen and Democrat Gary Hart were best man and groomsman, respectively. The couple has four children. Cindy is the founder of the Arizona Voluntary Medical Team, a nonprofit organization that sends doctors and nurses to disaster-stricken areas around the world. Her involvement in the organization also led the McCains to adopt a child from Bangladesh. In 1994, she made a series of bravura confessions: that she had had a longtime addiction to painkillers like Vicodin and Percocet, some of which, most unfortunately, she had stolen from the charity organization that she had founded. Also ill-timed was the revelation from a colleague who claimed that Cindy had asked him to lie about her drug use when she was in the midst of the adoption process. McCain suffered a stroke in 2004 from which she has reportedly recovered.

CLOSER STILL…

Jeri Kehn Thompson, wife of Fred Thompson: Raised in Naperville, Ill., the DePauw graduate has already received a healthy amount of media attention, almost exclusively for her looks, which are good, and her age, which is not as young as everyone seems to assume. Yes, she is 24 years younger than her spouse, the “Law and Order” actor and Republican candidate, but the notion that she is a slutty twinkie is just the wet dream of every hard-up pundit on cable news. The Washington Post noted this summer that Thompson would be “the nation’s youngest first lady since Jacqueline Kennedy,” while the New York Times labeled her a trophy wife, and, naturally enough, Joe Scarborough felt free to wonder if Jeri “works the pole.” But sorry, boys! Thompson is 41, a political consultant, and she is deeply, heavily, seriously involved in her husband’s campaign. As one anonymous staffer told the Post, “Everything for her is at Defcon.”

Janet Huckabee, wife of Mike Huckabee: Married for 33 years to her high-school sweetheart, Janet Huckabee joins Hillary Clinton in demonstrating that they grow girl ambition as big as the watermelons in Arkansas. She ran for Arkansas secretary of state in 2002. She and her husband also had the cojones to register for more than $6,000 worth of gifts on a wedding registry when they threw themselves a 2006 housewarming party for their new digs in Little Rock.

THE FINALISTS

Bill Clinton, husband of Hillary Clinton: Well, what is there to say, really? But let’s take a crack: First, Bill clearly gets points for answering the “one of these things is not like the other” riddle. He is a boy. The only one on this list. He met Hillary in law school at Yale; they have been married for 32 years; they have one daughter, Chelsea. He is a longtime governor of Arkansas who now runs the Clinton Foundation, an organization that aims to help alleviate the problems of poverty, AIDS and global warming around the world. An enthusiastic saxophonist, Clinton was once impeached after getting caught receiving blow jobs from a White House intern during his eight years as president of the United States. Bill has a penchant for fast food that he’s had to overcome after undergoing serious cardiac surgery three years ago.

Michelle Obama, wife of Barack Obama: Michelle met Barack when he was hired as her underling. A powerful lawyer raised on the south side of Chicago and educated at Princeton and Harvard, Michelle married her husband in 1992; they have two daughters. She is now the vice president for community and external affairs at the University of Chicago Hospitals. Obama is unrelenting both in her support for her husband, and in her sharp criticism of him and the campaigning process. She has called him “snore-y and stinky,” and kvetched about the amount of time he’s not at home, and about his inability to make the bed. This earned her an odd enemy in Maureen Dowd, who ripped her for being “emasculating.” But there’s something refreshingly transparent about the willingness with which the couple has discussed the strife that arose when he began devoting so much of his time to his political career. And it’s hard not to cheer a candidate’s spouse who willingly tells USA Today that she doesn’t want to get “so tied to all that [her husband] is that I don’t have anything for me.” Michelle might actually be a feminist superhero, whose best and most famous line is what she told her husband before he took the podium for his star-making speech at the 2004 Democratic convention: “Don’t screw it up, buddy.”

Elizabeth Harper Kucinich, wife of Rep. Dennis Kucinich: Where to start, or more realistically, where to stop? The tall, pre-Raphaelite 30-year-old is British, and met her swain, the elfin Dennis Kucinich, while touring his office with the American Monetary Institute. She sent him an e-mail with the signature quote, “Knowing love I shall allow all things to come and go, to be as supple as the wind and take everything that comes with great courage. My heart is as open as the sky.” They next got together at Shirley MacLaine’s house, confessed their love to each other in front of the fire, and were engaged to be married within weeks. This is a description of Elizabeth’s early life, from the Cleveland Plain Dealer: “She grew up in the 1980s in the tiny English village of North Ockendon, in a cottage where Pea Lane meets Dennis Lane. At Maytree Cottage, she planted flowers, listened to her mother read stories by the wood stove in winter, and with her younger sister tended stray animals.” Now, the wood nymph has a MySpace page on which she has included the complete lyrics to “Stairway to Heaven.” She recently scored major points for talking straight back to uptight interrogator Nora O’Donnell; when asked about her tongue piercing, Elizabeth shot back, completely reasonably, “I’m 30 years old. I’ve had it for 10 years. I don’t see it as being a problem. I do still wear pearls.”

THE WINNER

Judi Giuliani, wife of Rudy Giuliani: Judi is Giuliani’s third wife, the woman he left second wife Donna Hanover for in a televised news conference. She sits at the front row of fashion shows, had a secret marriage she only came forward with when her husband announced his nomination, which was around the same time the couple announced that she would sit in on cabinet meetings were he elected. It has been reported that while her husband was still mayor of New York, if aides referred to her as “Judi” instead of “Judith,” she would bawl them out. She buys extra seats on planes for her Louis Vuitton handbag. She has inspired an open rift between the candidate and his children: Andrew, who helpfully explained to reporters that he is estranged from his dad because “a problem exists between me and his wife,” and Caroline, a Harvard student who demonstrated the froideur earlier this year by admitting on her MySpace page that she was supporting Barack Obama. But it is the fact that Judi Giuliani once held a job in which she demonstrated medical equipment on puppy dogs who often died after or during the demonstrations that really kicks her up a notch and puts her head and shoulders above the rest of the pack.

Continue Reading Close
Rebecca Traister

Rebecca Traister writes for Salon. She is the author of "Big Girls Don't Cry: The Election that Changed Everything for American Women" (Free Press). Follow @rtraister on Twitter.

Page 67 of 82 in Mitt Romney