Mother's Day

An introduction

We devote a week to Mother's Day and the messages that don't fit on the cards.

  • more
    • All Share Services

An introduction

Holidays that revolve around relationships are tricky. To enjoy them, to even recognize them, one has to clear the mental hurdles presented by their shaky provenance or commercial underpinnings. Then, traveling from the head to the heart, it becomes necessary to contend with the more complicated issue of their timing. These fetes don’t always come at a convenient moment for the displays of affection or devotion that they require. The high holy days of happy family — Thanksgiving comes to mind — can be dreaded marathons of discomfort for those of us with, well, families. The romantic pinnacles of the year — Valentine’s Day, New Year’s Eve — often are the nadir of loneliness if not observed with a kiss.

And Mother’s Day? Complex, to say the least. It is, in theory, a legal timeout to indulge in universal joy and sentimental reflection. After all, everybody has — or had — a mother. Gratitude, at minimum, would seem to rule the day. But that assumes so much — too much — about so many. It can be hard to be thankful without also being furious or miserable or full of regret. And then there is guilt, divvied in uneven portions, consumed in reflexive gulps — the coin of the motherhood realm.

We love them and leave them. We hate them and bring them our laundry. We only wish they were different. We don’t even know who they are. Of course there is room for hearts and flowers, the adorable and inedible breakfast in bed. But there is occasion too, unavoidable on the day, for ugly epiphanies, expressions of loss and widespread confusion.

We devote a week, starting today, to Mother’s Day and the messages that don’t fit on the cards. Essays in this fine collection veer from pillar to post, exploring mother as nun, comparing bohemian mom to conventional mom, meeting the mom who hates Mother’s Day. Look also for the small portraits of motherhood offered by a different novelist — Amy Bloom, Kathryn Harrison, Elissa Schappell, Lisa Zeidner, Colin Harrison — each day.

Jennifer Foote Sweeney, CMT, formerly a Salon editor, is a massage therapist in northern California, practicing on staff at the Institutes for Health and Healing in San Francisco and Larkspur, and on the campuses of the Alta Bates Summit Medical Center in Berkeley.

Squash that bug!

The media catches the "love bug," and starts replicating stories like a virus gone mad.

  • more
    • All Share Services

There’s nothing like a love bug to get folks excited. All across the Net, geeks and newbies alike are agog about the virus that’s run amok, and the media is feeding the frenzy. By Friday afternoon both News.com and Wired News had churned out nearly a dozen stories each on this Manila-born threat. While corporate networks were apparently being shut down to avoid the wrath of the virus posing as a love-letter attachment, the news services were racing to report the latest variations, the revelation that the love-bug can munch your MP3s and why those security holes in Microsoft Outlook never seem to get fixed — plus much, much more.

The Associated Press wires were humming all day with updates on the virus and titillating headlines like “D.C. Weathers E-Mail Virus” and “Love Bug Bites Bush Campaign.” Even the venerable Wall Street Journal was bitten by the bug, plastering the cover of its Friday Marketplace section with five stories on the topic. Can the world function without e-mail? the newspaper gravely ponders. Some hard-hitting journalists gathered quotes from the scene of the disaster (“I’ve been spending the morning calling people telling them I don’t really love them,” reports one victim), while their colleagues ruminated on the “lonely hearts” who must feel left out because they didn’t get the virus. (In contrast, at Scripting News, Dave Winer asks: “Are you pondering what I’m pondering? If you didn’t get the virus, does that mean you have smart friends??”)

You have to hand it to the author or authors of these viruses — they are certainly witty. Who could resist the siren call of an attachment that is preceded by the dire message that:

“We have proceeded to charge your credit card for the amount of $326.92 for the mothers day diamond special. We have attached a detailed invoice to this email. Please print out the attachment and keep it in a safe place. Thanks Again and Have a Happy Mothers Day!”

Who wouldn’t click on a love letter, apparently from the cute boy in production, or the “funny joke” that your mother sent you? With eight variations so far (as reported by News.com), the virus creators’ originality seems to have no end; despite a Net population that is now paranoid about the virus, people are apparently still clicking on the newest attachments.

Here, for your edification, are five virus messages that didn’t make the cut.

  • Guess what? Metallica just released a new single, and they released it in MP3! I just downloaded it from Napster — check it out! Click on the attachment.

  • Hey friend — just came across this photograph of you … You look great, but I have just one question for you. Who’s the hottie lying next to you? Take a look.

  • This e-mail just landed in my in box, and I nearly died when I saw what it said — someone from human resources accidentally forwarded me a list of everyone in the company’s salaries. I attached it so that you could take a look at it. You aren’t going to be pleased with what you see.

  • Free bug give-away! I just found out about this offer to win a New Limited Edition Volkswagen Beetle, available only on the Web. Just fill out the attached form.

  • You won’t believe this. Elian’s been secretly returned to Cuba! Here’s a picture of him with Fidel Castro taken this morning in Havana.

  • Continue Reading Close

    Janelle Brown is a contributing writer for Salon.

    Katharine Mieszkowski is a senior writer for Salon.

    What a few good women can do

    On Mother's Day, a million mothers will march for gun control.

    • more
      • All Share Services

    Every so often in life, you encounter a brilliant idea. Usually, at least in my case, it’s somebody else’s idea.

    Organ donation, for example, is a brilliant idea. A person who, tragically, no longer needs an organ, gives it to someone who would otherwise die without it: Brilliant.

    Or City Harvest, the New York program that picks up excess food from hotels and restaurants where it would otherwise be thrown away and delivers it to soup kitchens and shelters, thus enabling the city’s poor to share in the culinary riches the wealthy enjoy daily: Brilliant.

    So last fall, when I first read about the Million Mom March, a Mother’s Day demonstration in Washington to protest the vast number of guns in our culture and the ease with which they can be procured, I thought … well, first I thought: “Why didn’t I think of that?” Then I thought: Brilliant.

    The person whose idea it was is Donna Dees-Thomases, a New Jersey mother and a part-time publicist for David Letterman. Dees-Thomases’ children attend preschool at a Jewish community center — a preschool not unlike the one in Granada, Calif., where, last August, a white supremacist decided to “send a message” by shooting at kids.

    A week after the JCC shooting, Dees-Thomases applied for a permit to march on the Washington Mall. Then she started calling her friends. Says Dees-Thomases: “It was my idea for about five minutes.”

    The Million Mom March was launched with a press conference on — symbolically enough — Labor Day. In keeping with the pregnancy theme, the 25 mothers at the press conference challenged Congress to use the nine months before Mother’s Day to enact what they call “common-sense” gun legislation.

    Personally, I would love to see every gun on the planet disappear. But the Million Mom platform isn’t calling for an outright ban on handguns. This march is about the no-brainer stuff: equipping all handguns with safety locks and childproofing devices; licensing and registering each handgun; requiring background checks and cooling-off periods before the purchase of a handgun; and limiting handgun purchases to one per month per person. It is hard to believe that responsible gun owners would want anything less.

    In nine months, Dees-Thomases announced at the press conference, thousands of mothers would march on Washington, either in celebration of such laws having been passed, or — in the more likely event of Congress’ continued inactivity on this issue — to reiterate the demand for them.

    It’s hard to imagine a barrage of objections to Dees-Thomases’ proposals. Aren’t we sick of it already? Haven’t we had enough of the carnage caused by guns? Ten-year-olds sharpshooting their classmates? Surly adolescents opening fire in the lunchroom? The “disgruntled former employee” looking to go out in a blaze of glory? A 6-year-old looking to settle a score on the playground?

    And what about the more than 4,000 children who die in gun-related accidents each year? That’s 11 kids a day. And we’re not talking about crimes, or intentional shootings. We’re talking — or not talking enough — about accidents.

    In March 1996, a paranoid loser took his arsenal into an elementary school in Dunblane, Scotland, and murdered 16 children and their teacher. The British were not silent in their outrage. Though guns in the United Kingdom were already relatively scarce, less than a year passed before an act of Parliament all but banned them. (It’s almost quaint to note the few guns exempted by this law: starter’s pistols, guns intended for the humane slaughter of animals and pistols for use in recognized pistol clubs, to be locked and stored in the clubs when not in use.)

    In this country, by contrast, this sensitive and decisive response to tragedy seems to be out of the question. Where is our outrage?

    The Million Mom March takes a big-tent approach to generating support for gun legislation: Its organizers believe that women from a broad political spectrum can and do agree that guns ought to be both regulated and rare.

    I’m looking forward to meeting people who disagree with me about everything under the sun except, for example, the notion that each gun manufactured in this country ought to be outfitted with one of the 30 existing patented devices designed to help childproof it. Even more, I look forward to the spectacle of hundreds of thousands of mothers (and others) converging on the Capitol. And perhaps most of all, I await with keen anticipation the spin that G. Gordon Liddy and his ilk will employ in order to demonize scores of mothers and their children.

    “Jack-booted soccer moms,” perhaps?

    Yes, there will be celebrities (Rosie O’Donnell has already RSVP’d). And yes, I’m sure a couple of rock stars will drop by to serenade us between the speeches, and yes, we will be joined by those members of Congress whose political convictions match our own.

    There will be the mothers and fathers of children whose lives have been devastated by guns. (Some of those mothers and fathers will travel all the way from Dunblane.)

    And then there will be the rest of us: those of us who know that our children are just as vulnerable to gun violence as anyone else so long as we continue to allow easy access to handguns.

    Naturally, no march on Washington would be complete without its counter-demonstration. The Armed Informed Mothers (that’s AIM for short), an offshoot of an organization called Second Amendment Sisters, will be there to let Congress know that they “won’t stand for having our right to defend our families ripped away.”

    According to this group, the Million Moms have all been persuaded that guns fire themselves. AIM has put a new spin on the old adage: “Guns don’t kill people; people kill people.” Their new version goes like this: “Any inanimate object will just sit there until a person picks it up. What they do with it depends on what kind of respect they’ve been taught for human life.”

    To me, respect for human life begins with making it more difficult to obtain an inanimate object that is designed to snuff it out.

    So when Mother’s Day rolls around May 14, I’m getting on the bus. Tough as it might sound to leave town on the only day of the year my children are obligated by law to be nice to me, I find it more important to spend the day making things a little better — a little safer — for them.

    Brilliant.

    Continue Reading Close

    Jean Hanff Korelitz is the author of the novel "The Sabbathday River," published by Farrar, Straus & Giroux.

    Thinking of you

    On Mother's Day, a daughter finds she can't escape the painful childhood memories that she hides from the rest of the year.

    • more
      • All Share Services

    A few months ago, I stopped opening my mother’s letters. A small, dark event,
    unsettling in its simple promise, that if I wanted, I could step out
    of the frame of family and set aside the choking accretion of 37 years.
    Foolish, sad presumption, that I could hope to contain this
    insistent bilious seepage with such a disproportionately simple act — or
    could I? I remember coming upstairs and setting her letter down, turning to
    take off my coat, then pausing to pick it up again. Looking with some
    detachment at the familiar code of the immigrant’s life: the overly glued
    flap catching parts of the contained pages, former defense against shifty
    third world postal employees carried over to her North American life; a
    continuous row of stamps patched together from what was found in purses and
    drawers, then supplemented at the post office window; a steeply cursive
    system of addressing that ignores all postal convention. I stand there
    unseeing, balancing the envelope on my open palm — then, I drop it, into
    the basket on my dresser. I do not have to open this. That done, and
    slowly realized, I suddenly have to sit down. I never have to open
    her letters again.

    “But she is your mother!” Years of hissing relatives come to bear on my
    sagging shoulders. She is my mother. As she has often reminded me herself,
    invoking God, my dead grandparents and every
    Hallmarkism she can think of, and me passing from anger to weary amusement
    to indifference. Yet, now, I am not so sure it is indifference — it seems to
    be more of a closing, born of a frantic need to survive wasted, lost years.
    I don’t want to open her letters anymore; I don’t want to listen to pages
    of a life endured with imperfect sons, daughters, husband,
    daughters-in-law, sons-in-law and other assorted relatives and people she
    knows. I don’t want to sit through the numbing minutiae of her last fight
    with my sister-in-law or suffer the various ailments that now seem to
    afflict her every waking moment or visit the squall she is being
    forced into with her sisters over the disposition of my
    grandparents’ property God rest their souls if they only knew your poor
    grandfather would turn over in his very grave.
    I am no longer willing to
    be a part of the frozen inert landscape into which my mother has
    permanently carved herself a resting place, unwilling to break free even in
    response to the muffled screams of a daughter whose childhood was being
    ripped away from her.

    But she is my mother. And every year at this time I stand in front of
    glistening bright row upon row of drippy sentiment enrobed in slick color:
    She is my mother and I have to send her a card for this holiest of all
    retail traditions, Mother’s Day.

    This farmer’s daughter, this tall, large-boned woman with the wide,
    archless feet of a person born to the soil, this person who bore five
    children into a violent marriage, this frightened child who shuttled
    between the redemptive calm of her parents home and the wrath of a vengeful
    husband, this uncertain adult, this woman is my mother. A mother I have
    held at arm’s length for as long as I can remember, with whom I have never
    shared girlish confidences. We don’t easily or at all display affection in
    our family. The last time I hugged my mother she was crying, because I had
    returned home for a surprise visit after a five-year absence. I recall how
    awkward I felt, how unfamiliar the physical closeness, and I remember an
    uncharitable thought: that the howling woman I was gingerly touching seemed
    to be crying less from release of emotion and more from the habit of coarse
    display. Because this is how she lived her life, by laying it bare to the
    nearest passerby. My mother kept no secrets and did not indulge in
    ruminative pastimes. Scandals were savored and quickly spread, illnesses
    were extended by detailing them to indulgent ears, decisions were by
    consensus of the community and weighed by the simple rubric of being able
    to hold her head up. And errant husbands earned one a place of honor in
    this society, allowing the sufferer many luxuriant hours of backyard chat
    with whispering neighbors.

    And yet, there is the other woman, the mother
    who gave her insistent teenage daughter her last $20 to buy
    shoes she absolutely must have because all the kids in her
    upper-middle-class school wore them. My mother dishes up meals to a gaping
    family
    maw and retires to the kitchen ostensibly to finish some chore, but really
    so she
    can eat her own diminished plate quickly. My mother is screaming from
    downstairs as she tries to fend off my drunken father and there we are, my
    brother and I, charging to her side, ready to kill in her defense.

    - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – -

    It’s Christmas Day and our family is sitting outside on the steps of
    our house. The landlord lives in the last house in the row, the second
    largest building. His is painted, with a fence and windows that have glass
    in them. He lives in the house with his wife, who has suffered a crippling
    stroke and can hardly walk, and his illegitimate daughter. His daughter is
    pregnant, and he is the father of the baby. The first house in this gray
    line of crumbling shacks is the largest and nicest of them all, home to the
    rest of his family, his son and daughter born of his marriage to his
    shrunken wife. His wife spends a lot of time in the front house, his son
    and daughter rarely visit the back house. I haven’t seen them today, which
    is odd because it’s Christmas and everybody visits at Christmastime.
    We’re sitting outside because my father has returned home and in a
    drunken fit has thrown most of the dinner out the window, along with some
    glasses, a pot and plates. He has long passed from frenzy into
    melancholia and is now sobbing into vomit-flecked sheets. Soon he will be
    asleep and we may even creep out to see our friends’ new toys. We have to
    hurry back, though, because he sleeps fitfully and has been known to awaken
    and start hollering for us.

    None of us want him alone and drunk with my
    mother, and I don’t want it ever to get dark because my mother will be
    asleep in our bed and he will insist that I sleep in
    theirs. As much as I try to will blessed unconsciousness, there is no
    escaping the
    base perversion the night will disgorge. But it means that he will calm
    toward my
    mother, and in that pitiful cause-and-effect pairing of the young, unformed
    mind, I see that I can help her, I can alleviate our suffering. I can shield
    my mother by having my father visit his awful intentions instead on my
    body. How perverse that a child should bargain for her mother’s
    welfare with her own self, that a mother should accept this heartbreaking
    gift — and that childhood should be dismissed in such a summary manner.

    My father tells the same story time and again when he has had too much to
    drink, when reason mutates into mindless black rage. It begins with my
    mother leaving him just before I was born and not returning until I was
    3 years old, and it ends the same way with each telling, with him
    sobbing and reaching for me, clumsily petting me and calling me his prize,
    his gold, his most treasured child, all the while spraying my mother in
    bespittled invective. He rails too against my mother’s family, but I sense
    fear and something else beneath the bitter onslaught: My father is both
    afraid and grudgingly respectful of my grandfather.

    I close my eyes and
    search for those early years, but there is nothing in my memory of the time
    spent with my grandparents, and there is an odd absence of any baby
    pictures in my grandparents’ photo albums. The earliest images I can find
    show a chubby, shy child holding hands with her brother in the front yard of
    my grandparents’ home on the Pomeroon River. In the background is the house
    my grandfather built, and off to the far right you can barely see the muted
    gleam of the Pomeroon.

    I love this river, the urgent, buzzing life of its banks and this creaky
    dim old farmhouse wrapped in the dense, ripe promise of fruit-heavy trees.
    It takes us an entire day to travel to the farm: cousins, aunts, my mother,
    brothers and sisters, all one excitable shrieking group, and us giddy with
    the realization that for a week or so, the long arm of my father will not
    reach this far. My aunts arrive first, weighed down with bags of food and
    clothing, which they arrange around their feet underneath the steamer’s
    slotted wooden benches. Once settled, they smile benignly at us, hand out
    sweets to clamoring hands, and we’re free to run off. Which we do, up and
    down the narrow stairs, shoving and yelling from the bow to the lower
    sections, perilously leaning out over the iron rails. The day slides by in
    a dusty rumble of docking boats and bumpy land vehicles, until our bus
    rolls to a belching end on the river bank. And there is my grandfather
    waiting by the launch — familiar, comforting, faded craggy gray head
    crinkling in our direction. He gets up and lumbers over, a stooped beloved
    giant of a man. We chug noisily down the river and arrive with the setting
    sun.

    This is when I have seen my mother at her happiest, with a father she loved
    and a life simple in its needs, generous in its return. We feasted hugely,
    childish appetites burst open by days of simple farm labor and excessive
    play, by climbing trees, swimming in murky river water, digging through
    piles of dusty old magazines, chasing after complacent chickens and running
    screaming from imaginary tigers. Oddly, I discovered I missed my father on
    the journey back and was foolishly glad to see him. I came to realize this
    was but a vestige of hopeful childhood that faded and died in time. I
    couldn’t make that journey to Pomeroon as often as I wanted, coming to rely
    instead on the embellished tales my siblings relayed back to me. My mother
    went many times, choosing not to see or to ignore a young child’s terror at
    being left behind, seeking for herself the desperate relief of her childhood
    home.

    That was the darkest time of my life, the years from my earliest memory
    until well after my 11th birthday. I haven’t seen my father in 12
    years, and four years ago I spoke to him for the last time. There were no
    showdowns, no violent last scenes, I just never picked up the phone again
    and never responded to letters. I spent much of my life trying to figure
    out why I was the target of his terrible abuse, and some
    explanations were there, but none that pointed the way to reconciliatory
    measures. At some point a shift must have occurred, because I stopped being
    angry with him — worse, I stopped thinking of him as my father. I think I
    grew weary of my own internal struggles and wanted very simply to move
    beyond them. But the anger didn’t go away; instead it shifted to my mother.

    What is a parent’s role? My West Indian ancestry stabs an accusing finger
    in my direction and swats the question away. It is the duty of the child to
    the parent that is more important. Your parents do for you and they
    sacrifice their entire lives and this is how you turn out. She is your
    mother!
    But a mother, my mother, would have taken me away from
    the hell of my home, my mother would have run away with me, my mother would
    have protected me. Instead my mother needed protecting, she sought escape
    and she couldn’t comfort, and in the end, the child could not continue
    being mother to its own mother. But children need their parents, and as
    much as I seem unable to draw comfort and enlist support from mine, I can’t
    ignore synthetic constructs such as Mother’s Day. I will send her a card so
    she can display it and point to it proudly and say, “That’s from my daughter
    in America.” A small white sheet of paper, embellished with color and
    glitter, its safe anonymity tells nothing of the sender, but to an aging
    woman on the far side of the continent, it speaks of hope and
    reconciliation and family.

    Continue Reading Close

    Rose Stoll is a writer living in Northern California.

    Page 6 of 6 in Mother's Day