Movie news

Remaking “The Evil Dead”: A conversation

With an unknown director at the helm and Diablo Cody doing the rewrites, there's no way this could go well, right?

  • more
    • All Share Services

Remaking Does "The Evil Dead" need an update?

So this is happening:

Sam Raimi and original producing partners Rob Tapert and Bruce Campbell (who also starred in the original franchise) are gearing up to remake their cult sensation THE EVIL DEAD through their long standing Ghost House Pictures partnership. Raimi and Tapert were such instant fans of Fede Alvarez’s short film “Panic Attack” that they set up a blind deal with the filmmaker and through that process have attached Fede Alvarez to write and direct the film. Alvarez wrote the script with Rodo Sayagues. Academy Award® winning screenwriter Diablo Cody is currently doing revisions on the draft.

The three producing partners commented, “We are committed to making this movie and are inspired by the enduring popularity and enthusiasm for the ‘Evil Dead’ series. We can’t wait to scare a new generation of moviegoers using filmmaking techniques that were not available to us thirty years ago as well as Fede bringing a fresh eye to the film’s original elements.”

Yikes? Or possibly yay? I think we can all agree that the phrase “blind deal” when it comes to remaking a cult classic is never a good sign (especially with a first-time feature director), but considering the low-budget appeal of “The Evil Dead,” maybe a reworking with some fresh blood wouldn’t be the worst thing in the world? My sister and I discussed it over breakfast this morning.

Drew: If I remember correctly, “The Evil Dead” wasn’t that amazing. It was kind of shlocky and campy.

Hannah: Exactly. So why remake them?

Drew: Well, because Diablo Cody can actually write pretty decent horror movie dialogue. “Jennifer’s Body” had a very tongue-in-cheek, female-Sam Raimi element to it.

Hannah: If she’s a good writer, she can go write her own original script. There’s no need to have such an influx of remakes. It’s sad to see that people can’t come up with their own ideas.

Drew: You just have a problem with remakes in general then?

Hannah: I’m just saying, where have all the original horror films gone? Why did we need a new “Halloween” or “Nightmare on Elm Street”?

Drew: The difference is that those two films were horror movie staples. They were classics, and remaking them … nothing could have been added to make them better. Who needed Michael Meyers’ back story? “The Evil Dead” was a cult films, but not necessarily a great film. It could have used a rewrite. The first half of “Evil Dead 2″ was basically just a remake of “Evil Dead” anyway. Essentially the same plot, with Bruce Campbell going into the cabin and discovering a Book of the Dead. Either he had terrible amnesia, or the sequel was a remake for people who hadn’t seen the first film.

Hannah: Fine. You can argue that point.

Drew: Although, if we were going to remake every cult film that could use polishing — “Pink Flamingos” or “Eraserhead” — I’d be pretty pissed off too. And in terms of horror movies, I agree that getting music video directors to sexify them up is dumb. But Zac Snyder’s remake of “Dawn of the Dead” was arguably … not horrible? Maybe there is room for a decent rewrite?

Hannah: OK, I’m done here.

Drew: But I think its silly to say this will introduce a whole new generation of fans to “The Evil Dead,” because the coda to that should be “… and piss off all the people who liked the movie in the first place.”

Hannah: …

Drew: I’m just glad this deal doesn’t include “Army of Darkness.” Diablo wouldn’t be able to make that script better.

 

So what do you think of the beginning of a new “Evil Dead” franchise? Love it or loathe it?

Drew Grant is a staff writer for Salon. Follow her on Twitter at @videodrew.

Sean Penn owns it in “This Must Be the Place”

A tale of an aging glam rock Nazi-hunter looks surprisingly touching

  • more
    • All Share Services

Sean Penn owns it in Penn is nonplussed.

One time I met Sean Penn. It was outside an event for the Huffington Post 100 (I was not one of them … surprised?) and he asked to bum a cigarette. I think I asked him something about Cuba? Anyway, this was the face he made the entire time we were talking. He did not look happy. I just had to face (ha?) facts: I’m no Scarlett Johansson. (Though I’m pretty sure he made that face hanging out with her too.)

So when people talk about how amazing Penn’s performance is in “This Must Be the Place” — where he plays an aging Robert Smith-type who decides to get all Roy Scheider in “Marathon Man” after his estranged father dies and goes on a cross-country trip to find his Nazi torturer — I believe them. Sean Penn is a really good actor! He is even good when he has to pretend to be happy, like in “Milk” (first half) or “I Am Sam.”

But Penn really shines when he gets to play a character who’s pretty much over it all: sarcastic, depressed and misanthropic (second half of “Milk,” all other Sean Penn vehicles).

Under all that Joker makeup, that’s basically how Sean Penn’s face naturally aligns itself anyway.

Point being: This movie looks pretty good. Though I’d really love it if Christoph Waltz made a cameo as the Nazi and we had a Jew-hunter-Nazi-hunter showdown between these two thespians. Barring that, I just hope it’s not “About Schmidt: Life’s a Drag.”

Continue Reading Close

Drew Grant is a staff writer for Salon. Follow her on Twitter at @videodrew.

Today’s must-see viral videos

Watch: Tom Green and Richard Simmons plank, Kathy Lee talks dog poop DNA, and Anderson Cooper still hates Snooki

  • more
    • All Share Services

Today's must-see viral videosSherlock Holmes, on the run in "A Game of Shadows."

1. Tom Green was planking before planking was cool

Though the sheer fact that Tom Green started the planking thing would be further evidence of its not being cool, right?

 

2. Planking to the oldies

Though if Richard Simmons is participating, it actually makes the whole thing seem way more legit.

 

3. Kathy Lee and Hoda on “Pooper Snoopers”

“Today” show red alert: Big brother is watching your dog poop, via doggy DNA.



4. Trailer for “Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows”

Professor Moriarty is going to be played by Lane Pryce (Jared Harris) from “Mad Men”? I don’t know how Holmes would stack up against Don Draper, but that’s a fight I would pay to see.

 

5. Anderson Cooper reads from Snooki’s new book

For all his protests against the “Jersey Shore” cast member, Anderson sure gets a lot of leverage off her fame. Like last night, when he read out loud portions of her novel, “A Shore Thing.” Which came out in January? Timely!

Continue Reading Close

Drew Grant is a staff writer for Salon. Follow her on Twitter at @videodrew.

Copyright concerns for “Wizard of Oz” prequel

Surprisingly, even a James Franco project isn't immune to legal battles over "iconic" images

  • more
    • All Share Services

Copyright concerns for "The Wizard of Oz."

When you think about Dorothy’s slippers from “The Wizard of Oz,” are they silver or ruby? How about the Wicked Witch … what color is she? What kind of dog is Toto?

Your answers to these questions are probably based on the 1939 MGM (now Warner Bros.) classic, “The Wizard of Oz,” and not the 1900 fairy tale “The Wonderful Wizard of Oz.” And unfortunately, this could mean trouble for Sam Raimi and James Franco’s new star-studded project, “Oz, the Great and Powerful,” according to a new ruling set by the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

See, for a while now the characters in “The Wizard of Oz” have been considered public domain, which is why there are so many strange adaptations  (“Return to Oz” being the most terrifying), since no one has to pay any royalties on the story. But the circuit is now clarifying that this doesn’t include the iconic imagery that was created for the Judy Garland film:

We agree with the district court’s conclusion that Dorothy, Tin Man, Cowardly Lion, and Scarecrow from “The Wizard of Oz” … exhibit “consistent, widely identifiable traits” in the films that are sufficiently distinctive to merit character protection under the respective film copyrights … Put more simply, there is no evidence that one would be able to visualize the distinctive details of, for example, Clark Gable’s performance before watching the movie “Gone with the Wind,” even if one had read the book beforehand. At the very least, the scope of the film copyrights covers all visual depictions of the film characters at issue.

Considering all the times a version of “Oz” has been remade for stage and screen (and I’m thinking particularly of “Wicked” here, which has Elphaba’s skin the same emerald hue as the witch in the Warner Bros. movie, not specified in the books), and the fact that there are several “Wizard of Oz” projects floating around Hollywood right now,  this ruling could have bigger implications outside the Raimi project.

Luckily, Oz interpreters have a little bit of wiggle room: There are at least 44 major changes in the Warner Bros. movie from the Frank Baum book, though it’s doubtful any of them will be iconic to viewers as “Oz” material, precisely because the famous film omitted or altered them. (Luckily for him, Raimi’s plot already sounds way different from anything we know of our beloved Wizard and his relationship to Oz.)

But even outside the Yellow Brick Road, this ruling could potentially affect any films that are based on other sources but have more famous movie predecessors. Luckily for directors like Tim Burton (who has remade both “Alice in Wonderland” and “Charlie and the Chocolate Factory), there is usually enough original material left on the cutting room floor of the influential predecessors to create entirely new imagery from.

Continue Reading Close

Drew Grant is a staff writer for Salon. Follow her on Twitter at @videodrew.

Spike Lee to direct “Oldboy” remake?

Rumors of adapting the cult manga/revenge film for American audiences still include Will Smith

  • more
    • All Share Services

Spike Lee to direct Choi Min-sik in "Oldboy."

Warning: This article contains a major plot spoiler for the film “Oldboy.”

Since Park Chan-wook’s South Korean revenge flick “Oldboy” won the Grand Prix at Cannes in 2004, producers have been trying to find a way to bastardize the project into a more American-friendly version. Steven Spielberg and Will Smith have both been attached to the title since 2008 (after director Justin Lin and Nic Cage dropped out of the running), though rumors have been swirling that the project has been dead in the water for at least a year.

There are basically two camps of thought on an “Oldboy” remake: the people who think that adapting the story of Oh Dae-Su — a man locked in a hotel room for 15 years and then mysteriously freed in order to find his captors — from either its original Japanese manga or its cinematic counterpart is a terrible idea … and those who aren’t familiar with the story.

Because the truth is, nobody familiar with the themes and imagery in “Oldboy” would ever consider Spielberg or Smith a good fit for such a dark, violent and challenging film. Though the source material has some comedic moments, major plot developments revolve around (SPOILER ALERT) at least two counts of incest. There are also gory scenes in the film that could rival anything Eli Roth or those “Saw” guys could put out, including a climatic moment where a character cuts out his own tongue.

So, no, “Oldboy” just doesn’t scream “Spielberg” to me … or Smith, for that matter. Tarantino? Maybe. But not the guy who directed “E.T.” or the Fresh Prince. Considering the queasy live sushi scene below is one of the “lighter” moments in the movie, could you really see Wills pulling it off?

As of yesterday, however, Spike Lee’s name has been floating around as a new director for the film. (He is apparently “in talks” with Mandate.) Even though it’s only a rumor, it’s possibly a game-changing one: Lee’s style is far more gritty and violent than Spielberg’s, and if Smith is still attached to the project, we’ll be far more likely to see an “I am Legend” performance than a “The Pursuit of Happyness” one with Spike at the helm.

If this movie does happen, the most we can hope for is that it doesn’t try to replicate the brilliant weirdness of Park Chan-wook’s adaptation. Instead, it could start from scratch with the manga, with Lee creating his own stylized world for Oh Dae-Su to navigate. I don’t have much faith in an American “Oldboy,” but at least now there is a little more to hope for.

Continue Reading Close

Drew Grant is a staff writer for Salon. Follow her on Twitter at @videodrew.

Five pop culture items we missed

Today's catch includes art-splatter tattoos, Tobey Maguire's illegal card ring, and Jim from "The Office" singing

  • more
    • All Share Services

Five pop culture items we missedPermanent art: the watercolor tattoos of a Lower East Side artist.

1. Tattoos of the day: Amanda Wachob’s ink has been all over the Internet lately.  Which is awesome, because her tattoos really are works of art. And also I have one.

2. Poker game of the day: Tobey Maguire was busted for illegal underground gambling in a card ring that included Matt Damon, Ben Affleck and Leonardo DiCaprio! Now they’ll have to go to celebrity jail!

3. Celebrity karaoke of the day: Jason Segel, Alison Brie, Emily Blunt and John Krasinski crashed a bachelor party in Ann Arbor, Mich. Insanity and singing ensues.  (Please let this mean Segel is dating “Community’s” Brie!)

4. Former “Deadwood” cast member of the day: Ian McShane, last seen in “Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides,” will be playing a dwarf named Ceasar in Universal’s ” Snow White and Huntsman.” That’s the one with Kristen Stewart as Snowie, and Charlize Theron as the wicked stepmother, not the adventure comedy “Snow White” project with Julia Roberts and Lily Collins.

5. Gay slur of the day: Chris Brown. Wait, really? Didn’t we already have to take Cee Lo to task today for his anti-gay tweet this morning

Continue Reading Close

Drew Grant is a staff writer for Salon. Follow her on Twitter at @videodrew.

Page 2 of 15 in Movie news