<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > MSNBC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/msnbc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 16:35:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Chris Matthews to end &#8220;The Chris Matthews Show&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/chris_matthews_to_end_the_chris_matthews_show/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/chris_matthews_to_end_the_chris_matthews_show/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 22:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Matthews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political shows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13286156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[However, the host has forged a deal with MSNBC and will stay on as "Hardball" host]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris Matthews is leaving "The Chris Matthews Show," his nationally syndicated politics talk show on NBC, whose last episode will air July 21, <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/chris-matthews-inks-long-term-deal-with-msnbc-but-ends-the-chris-matthews-show_b177542">reports TVNewser</a>. </p><p>The departure is part of the host's new long-term contract with MSNBC, where he will continue to host "Hardball." Matthews says that with his extra time, he will work "on writing books like the one I’m committed to now on the relationship between Tip O’Neill and Ronald Reagan, that and producing documentaries on history and politics."</p><p>Matthews' full statement, below:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/chris_matthews_to_end_the_chris_matthews_show/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/chris_matthews_to_end_the_chris_matthews_show/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Elite conventional wisdom is losing on Social Security</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/elite_conventional_wisdom_is_losing_on_social_security/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/elite_conventional_wisdom_is_losing_on_social_security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cutting social security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social safety net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Hayes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ezra Klein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fertility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13278070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The crowd calling for cutting benefits is being overtaken by another movement: A proposal to expand the program]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the past two weeks, two radically different proposals for the future of Social Security have provoked widespread discussion in the media.</p><p>One proposal was made by President Barack Obama, as part of his proposed budget. This called for using inflation adjustments to deprive the middle-class elderly of nearly 10 percent of their promised Social Security benefits if they lived to their 90s, while only the poor would be shielded from the cuts. Obama’s proposal was angrily denounced by progressives and conservatives alike.</p><p>The rival proposal came in a policy paper called “<a href="http://growth.newamerica.net/publications/policy/expanded_social_security">Expanded Social Security</a>,” written by Steven Hill, Robert Hiltonsmith, Joshua Freedman and me, and published by the New America Foundation’s Economic Growth Program. Our plan called for a major expansion of Social Security benefits, on the grounds that Social Security is far more efficient and reliable than the other two “legs” of the retirement security “stool” — employer pensions (both defined-benefit pensions and 401Ks) and tax-deferred private savings accounts like IRAs.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/elite_conventional_wisdom_is_losing_on_social_security/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/elite_conventional_wisdom_is_losing_on_social_security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>70</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NBC terrorism analysts need more transparency</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/nbc_analysts_need_more_transparency/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/nbc_analysts_need_more_transparency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 15:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Counterterrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rachel Maddow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Hayes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contractors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13279444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Network rarely discloses that its security commentators are also U.S. government contractors ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Compared to the near-hysterical reporting on Fox and the mistake-prone efforts at CNN, the handling of the Boston Marathon attack and investigation by NBC (and sister cable channel MSNBC) was straightforward and subdued -- thanks in large part to its experienced reporting team and in-house national security analyst, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Leiter" target="_blank">Michael Leiter</a>. Leiter, who started at NBC last fall, is the former director of the National Counter Terrorism Center (NCTC), the inter-agency situation room in Northern Virginia where the U.S. government synchronizes all of its intelligence analysis. During the week, he was a constant presence on both NBC and MSNBC, providing extensive details about what was likely unfolding on the ground.</p><p>On Wednesday’s <em>NBC Nightly News</em>, for example, Brian Williams brought Leiter on to explain how investigators should deal with the evidence they had collected so far, including “tons of imagery” and backpacks, wires and a battery left by the bombers. Would all of that be a “big early help”? Absolutely, replied Leiter. “All of that imagery from the store, from the police and from people, you combine that with the forensic evidence and then the secret intelligence that we are not hearing about from human intelligence sources, cell phone records, things like that,” he said. “And that starts to paint the mosaic from which they can find their suspect.” He provided much of the same information later on MSNBC’s evening broadcasts and over the weekend on the <em>Today Show</em>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/nbc_analysts_need_more_transparency/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/nbc_analysts_need_more_transparency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sunday shows dissect the Boston attacks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/21/sunday_shows_dissect_the_boston_attacks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/21/sunday_shows_dissect_the_boston_attacks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2013 17:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deval Patrick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dzhokhar Tsarnaev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tamerlan Tsarnaev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Stephanopoulos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Schieffer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Kornacki]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Up with Steve Kornacki]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13277815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Guests examined what the attacks mean locally, nationally and internationally]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today’s Sunday shows, like everyone else, tried to pick apart the details of how and why the terrorist attacks occurred in Boston this week. On CBS’s “<a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/face-the-nation/">Face the Nation</a>” Bob Schieffer interviewed Rep. Mike McCaul (R.-Texas), Chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee.</p><p>“My theory is [Tamerlan Tsarnaev] was radicalized by 2009, 2010,” McCaul said. “Reports show the Russian Intelligence Service reach out to our law enforcement to interview this individual, which they did. He was on the radar, then he got off the radar. Then he travels overseas. I would assume the Russians would have some intelligence on this individual.”</p><p>Although he lacks direct evidence McCaul appeared to suggest that Tamerlan, who reportedly had a bomb strapped to his chest when he was shot, had ties to international terrorist networks. “I think another important point [is] the tools of trade craft used here,” McCaul said. “This pressure cooker device is very similar to what the Taliban in Pakistan use. The idea that they could make pipe bombs and then there are reports they had suicide vests, all point to the fact that this was…”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/21/sunday_shows_dissect_the_boston_attacks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/21/sunday_shows_dissect_the_boston_attacks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The sprinting, sloppy TV news coverage of the Boston manhunt</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/the_sprinting_sloppy_tv_news_coverage_of_the_boston_manhunt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/the_sprinting_sloppy_tv_news_coverage_of_the_boston_manhunt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 20:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Bombings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cable News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13276692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The false need for speed]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you woke up after 7:30 EDT this morning, there have been no new developments in the manhunt for Dzhokhar A. Tsarnaev, the white-hat-wearing 19-year-old suspect in the Boston bombing, since you got out of bed. If you have been following the story closely on television — or Twitter — it most certainly feels like this could not be the case. Over the past nine hours, news coverage has been in a flat-out sprint, continuous and unending, huffing and puffing to supply us with the latest news when there is no new latest news. The news networks are treading water but trying to make it look like they are free-styling by hysterically flailing their arms in a forward motion. At one of the rare moments when there is a huge, breaking news story, TV news is having just as rocky, sloppy and manipulative a time filling its schedule as when it is struggling to find stories to cover. How can this be?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/the_sprinting_sloppy_tv_news_coverage_of_the_boston_manhunt/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/the_sprinting_sloppy_tv_news_coverage_of_the_boston_manhunt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trump: Chris Matthews &#8220;gets dumber&#8221; every year</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/trump_chris_matthews_gets_dumber_every_year/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/trump_chris_matthews_gets_dumber_every_year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Matthews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right wing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13272495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trump attacked Matthews for a comment suggesting that domestic terrorists tend to come from the right]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donald Trump took up the criticism of MSNBC host Chris Matthews, who, during coverage of the attacks in Boston on Monday, wondered if it could be the work of domestic terrorists. "Normally domestic terrorists, people, tend to be on the far right. Though that’s not a good category, just extremists, let’s call them that," Matthews said.</p><p>In response, Trump tweeted on Tuesday:</p><p>[embedtweet id="324165224502534145"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="324167784118505474"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="324167991963041792"]</p><p>Matthews' remarks had been picked up by a <a href="http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/04/15/chris-matthews-on-boston-bombings-domestic-terrorists-tend-to-be-on-the-far-right/">number</a> of <a href="http://washingtonexaminer.com/chris-matthews-bombing-might-be-domestic-attack-in-response-to-tax-day/article/2527265">conservative</a> news <a href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2013/04/15/chris-matthews-did-boston-bombing-have-anything-do-tax-day">sites</a>, who took issue with the characterization. "Chris Matthews seems hell-bent on trying to blame the Boston Marathon bombing on a domestic terrorist, preferrably a conservative one," wrote Noel Sheppard of Newsbusters, for example, who also pointed to comments Matthews made about the attacks possibly being linked to Tax Day.</p><p>Here's the clip, via Newsbusters:</p><p><iframe title="MRC TV video player" src="http://www.mrctv.org/embed/120852" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/trump_chris_matthews_gets_dumber_every_year/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/trump_chris_matthews_gets_dumber_every_year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston Marathon explosion: On cable, the same footage, best behavior</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/boston_marathon_explosion_on_cable_the_same_footage_best_behavior/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/boston_marathon_explosion_on_cable_the_same_footage_best_behavior/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 02:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Bombings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13272026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From CNN to Fox News, reporters tried hard not to speculate. But there's just so much time to fill...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the immediate aftermath of national tragedies, TV news becomes a kind of collective waiting room: You’re there because you can’t be anywhere else. There’s nowhere else to go, nowhere else to channel your fear and anxiety, or at least nowhere else that could maybe inform you, in five minutes or five hours, of something that you might need or want to know, something that will make sense of what happened. So for hours and hours you wait, because waiting is all there is to do, with news teams that have real, serious, tragic news to report -- but too much empty time to report it in.</p><p>Immediately after the bombing at the Boston Marathon, all of the network news channels, the cable news channels, and ESPN were airing nonstop commercial-free coverage of the catastrophe. Shamed by recent misreportings brought on by working too fast and carelessly — falsely IDing Ryan Lanza as the shooter at Newtown, claiming Gabrielle Giffords was dead, botching the Affordable Care Act decision— the news programs tried to be cautious. They were careful not repeat something just because it had appeared on Twitter (or in the New York Post). They didn’t want to speculate — the anchors kept saying they didn’t want to speculate — but they did have time to fill, and so on-air experts started talking about whether the attack was "sophisticated" or "homegrown,” whether it was perpetrated by al-Qaida or a lone wolf, whether the presence of shrapnel suggested the bomb makers had overseas roots or a working knowledge of the Internet. Speculation accrued.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/boston_marathon_explosion_on_cable_the_same_footage_best_behavior/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/boston_marathon_explosion_on_cable_the_same_footage_best_behavior/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Occupy&#8217;s legacy: The media finally covers social protest fairly</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/occupys_legacy_the_media_finally_covers_social_protest_fairly/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/occupys_legacy_the_media_finally_covers_social_protest_fairly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2013 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13266952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Occupy's message about income inequality took hold because the media, for once, took a grassroots protest seriously]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>None of us was prepared for what happened next in Zuccotti Park. It was surprising enough that the police did not immediately evict the occupiers. We expected the most likely scenario was for hundreds of riot cops, backed up by horses and copters, to be unleashed against us that very night. This would certainly be in keeping with the style of the NYPD, whose usual strategy is to overwhelm protesters with sheer force of numbers. Yet in this case, someone made the decision to hold back.</p><p>One reason was the ambiguity of the legal situation: While public parks close by 12 p.m., Zuccotti Park was a public-private hybrid, owned by an investment firm, Brookfield Office Properties. Technically such “privately owned public properties” are accessible to the public twenty-four hours a day. Still, by our experience, the mere existence of such a law would have been of little relevance if the authorities decided they wanted to evict us anyway, but it allowed something of a fig leaf. But why did they even want a fig leaf?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/occupys_legacy_the_media_finally_covers_social_protest_fairly/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/occupys_legacy_the_media_finally_covers_social_protest_fairly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Could Obama really learn something from Reagan?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/believe_it_or_not_obama_can_learn_from_reagan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/believe_it_or_not_obama_can_learn_from_reagan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 13:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chained CPI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cutting social security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rachel Maddow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Axelrod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deficit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13267885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A stunning, old quote reveals the Gipper understood that Social Security has nothing to do with the deficit]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Between <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2005/02/02/retirement/stofunion_socsec/">2005</a> and today, a series of elections took place that fully rejected the Republican economic worldview that says America must cut successful programs like Social Security. Yet, eight years after President Bush first proposed <a href="http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/economy/news/2005/05/05/1462/primer-on-president-bushs-plan-for-social-security-privatization/">cutting Social Security</a>, we have somehow <a href="http://www.thenation.com/blog/173771/will-voters-forgive-obama-cutting-social-security">arrived back where we started</a> - only instead of a Republican president championing Social Security reductions it is a Democratic president.</p><p>This bizarre repetition of presidential history was the subject of Rachel Maddow's <a href="http://video.msnbc.msn.com/the-rachel-maddow-show/51500389">MSNBC interview</a> last night of President Obama's top political consigliere David Axelrod. The discussion was significant for how Axelrod tried to avoid answering why, when it comes to Social Security, President Obama is now positioning himself to the right of Ronald Reagan. He is doing this by invoking deficits and debt as the reason to propose cutting Social Security, even though that program that has <a href="http://www.epi.org/publication/social_security_and_the_federal_deficit/">almost nothing to do with the national deficit and debt</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/believe_it_or_not_obama_can_learn_from_reagan/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/believe_it_or_not_obama_can_learn_from_reagan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Melissa Harris-Perry doesn&#8217;t want to steal your children</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/melissa_harris_perry_doesnt_want_to_steal_your_children/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/melissa_harris_perry_doesnt_want_to_steal_your_children/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Melissa Harris-Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Caller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Childhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Faludi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New Yorker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13266811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The MSNBC host stirred up a tempest -- but she was right]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Melissa Harris-Perry thought it was, in her words, <a href="http://tv.msnbc.com/2013/04/09/why-caring-for-children-is-not-just-a-parents-job/">"an uncontroversial comment."</a> But when the MSNBC host and political commenter made a "Lean forward" spot for the network in which she made the bold wish "for Americans to see children as everyone’s responsibility," the conservative spin machine went into extra-frothy mode.</p><p>"We have never invested as much in public education as we should have," she says in the spot. "We haven't had a very collective notion of, these are our children. We have to break through our private idea that kids belong to their parents, or kids belong to their families, and recognize that kids belong to whole communities. Once it's everybody's responsibility and not just the household's, we start making better investments."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/melissa_harris_perry_doesnt_want_to_steal_your_children/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/melissa_harris_perry_doesnt_want_to_steal_your_children/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>175</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crazy righty: Karen Finney’s not black enough</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/crazy_righty_karen_finney%e2%80%99s_not_black_enough/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/crazy_righty_karen_finney%e2%80%99s_not_black_enough/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karen Finney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tim graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Research Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13259364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Media Research Center staffer says John Boehner is darker-skinned than the new MSNBC host  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Reince Priebus: Here’s some more top-notch minority outreach from your partners at the right-wing Media Research Center.</p><p>MSNBC just announced that Karen Finney, a network political analyst and former communications director of the Democratic National Committee, will host a new weekend show. <a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/04/02/mrcs-tim-graham-suggests-new-msnbc-host-not-dar/193431">MRC director of media analysis Tim Graham immediately Tweeted</a>:</p><blockquote><p>MSNBC touting Karen Finney as another African-American host. Would the average viewer be able to guess that? Or is Boehner a shade more tan?</p> <p>— Tim Graham (@TimJGraham) <a href="https://twitter.com/TimJGraham/status/319180589049724929">April 2, 2013</a></p></blockquote><p><script charset="utf-8" type="text/javascript" src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script>Finney is African-American, although MSNBC didn’t particularly “tout” that in its press release; it mentioned that she was the first African-American communications director of the DNC and is a member of the National Association of Black Journalists. I’m not sure what would cause Graham to even muse about her racial bona fides, let alone share his idiocy publicly. When mocked on Twitter, he just dug his hole deeper:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/crazy_righty_karen_finney%e2%80%99s_not_black_enough/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/crazy_righty_karen_finney%e2%80%99s_not_black_enough/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>176</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Maddow: Good luck, Tucker!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/maddow_good_luck_tucker/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/maddow_good_luck_tucker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 21:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rachel Maddow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tucker Carlson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New Republic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13253992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MSNBC star tells Salon about her history with the indefatigable Tucker Carlson -- who's headed to "Fox and Friends"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rachel Maddow tells Salon that she is rooting for <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2013/03/tucker-carlson-to-cohost-fox-friends-weekends-160334.html">newly hired</a> "Fox and Friends" weekend anchor Tucker Carlson -- the man who helped bring her on board at MSNBC.</p><p>In a recent New Republic cover story on the liberal-leaning cable news network, Rebecca Dana <a href="http://www.newrepublic.com/article/112733/roger-ailes-msnbc-how-phil-griffin-created-lefts-fox-news">wrote</a>: "In 2005, Tucker Carlson’s team brought Rachel Maddow into the network based on a tape her agent sent them. Maddow wasn’t Griffin’s style—she didn’t look like a Fox blonde—but Carlson insisted that she stay on, and Maddow quickly proved herself to be erudite and winning on-air."</p><p>Surprising, considering that Carlson is now the editor in chief of the conservative <a href="http://dailycaller.com/">Daily Caller</a> and seems like a natural fit at "Fox and Friends." But, Maddow told Salon via email, there's truth to it:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/maddow_good_luck_tucker/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/maddow_good_luck_tucker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>S.E. Cupp is wrong on marriage, but not why you might think</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/s_e_cupps_wrong_on_marriage_but_not_why_you_might_think/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/s_e_cupps_wrong_on_marriage_but_not_why_you_might_think/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 16:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S.E. Cupp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13253560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The conservative commentator and I disagree on gay marriage. It's her promotion of it that I find worrying]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As if we needed further evidence of the malleable nature of ideology, this week conservative pundit S.E. Cupp responded to my critique of conservative “marriage promotion” arguments for supporting gay marriage by defending the cause of marriage equality:</p><p><iframe src="http://videos.mediaite.com/embed/player/?content=JD3GZ22W618T6305&amp;content_type=content_item&amp;layout=&amp;playlist_cid=&amp;widget_type_cid=svp&amp;read_more=1" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" width="420" height="421"></iframe></p><p>Here’s what I wrote in my <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/are_gop_gay_marriage_supporters_hurting_the_cause/" target="_blank">original Salon essay</a>:</p><blockquote> <div>In the interest of expediency and bringing as many unlikely conservative allies on board, the gay rights movement may give cover to or even amplify a set of narrow values that rank married families as better than unmarried families, two parents as better than one parent — norms that continue to divide America into good people and deserving families versus everyone else. And even if we temporarily succeed in getting gay folks added to the “good” category, is it worth it? Plus do we really think that’s the way we or anyone else will be treated equally?</div> </blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/s_e_cupps_wrong_on_marriage_but_not_why_you_might_think/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/s_e_cupps_wrong_on_marriage_but_not_why_you_might_think/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Joe Scarborough apologizes for Pelosi-Iraq War comments</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/joe_scarborough_apologizes_for_pelosi_iraq_war_comments/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/joe_scarborough_apologizes_for_pelosi_iraq_war_comments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 20:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Scarborough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morning Joe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13248328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On "Morning Joe," Scarborough issued a correction for saying Pelosi was "beating the drums of war"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Thursday's "Morning Joe," Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski <a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/03/19/morning-joe-wrong-on-pelosi-beating-the-drums-o/193124">apologized</a> and issued a correction for showing selectively edited footage of Nancy Pelosi that Scarborough described as Pelosi "beating the drums of war."</p><p>Salon's Alex Pareene <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/msnbc_selectively_remembers_the_iraq_war/">pointed out</a> that in a video segment to commemorate the Iraq War, Scarborough had said in a voice-over that "the very same people who spent years beating up George Bush were the very ones beating the drum for Iraq's regime change and Saddam Hussein's ouster." The video then shows Pelosi saying, "I applaud the president's focusing on this issue, and on taking the lead to disarm Saddam Hussein," but leaves out her remarks afterward that "I rise in opposition to this resolution on national security grounds."</p><p>"In fact, it seems like she got it just about right," Scarborough said in Thursday's segment, as he and Brzezinski apologized.</p><p>Watch:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/joe_scarborough_apologizes_for_pelosi_iraq_war_comments/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/joe_scarborough_apologizes_for_pelosi_iraq_war_comments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MSNBC selectively remembers the Iraq War</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/msnbc_selectively_remembers_the_iraq_war/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/msnbc_selectively_remembers_the_iraq_war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 19:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Scarborough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morning Joe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Woodward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luke Russert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13246025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Updated: Morning Joe and Luke Russert leave out some important context. Like how much MSNBC pushed for war]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>[UPDATE BELOW]</b> MSNBC today ran two very interesting segments addressing the 10th anniversary of the start of the Iraq War. In one, Luke Russert <a href="http://video.msnbc.msn.com/the-daily-rundown/51239782#51239782">interviewed veteran NBC foreign correspondent Richard Engel</a> on the state of Iraq today (spoiler: not great). In another, <a href="http://www.nbcnews.com/id/3036789/#51237921">Joe Scarborough hosted a large panel</a> to discus how the Iraq War happened and what went wrong.</p><p>The <a href="http://video.msnbc.msn.com/the-daily-rundown/51239782#51239782">Russert segment is sort of bizarre</a>, referring to "that big anniversary" and completely ignoring the reasons the Iraq War <em>started.</em> It concludes -- after Engel explains how Iraq is once again in a sectarian civil war -- with Russert essentially asserting the inevitability of a military strike against <em>Iran,</em> saying they could be "months" away from building nuclear weapons.</p><p><a href="http://www.nbcnews.com/id/3036789/#51237921">Here's the Morning Joe segment.</a> It's long, but well worth watching. Bob Woodward's presence adds a note of dark comedy to the proceedings. No one bothers to mention <a href="http://www.thenation.com/blog/173245/bob-woodwards-biggest-failure-iraq#">any of his horrible pre-war punditry</a>, or his culpability for the misleading journalism the Washington Post was producing at the time.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/msnbc_selectively_remembers_the_iraq_war/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/msnbc_selectively_remembers_the_iraq_war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Steve Kornacki blows &#8220;Up&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/steve_kornacki_blows_up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/steve_kornacki_blows_up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 16:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Kornacki]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13245590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Salon senior writer named new host of brainy MSNBC weekend show]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He's shared vital analysis in his daily <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/opening_shot/">Opening Shot</a> column, keen insights into his <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/16/the_coming_out_story_i_never_thought_id_write/">own</a> <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/16/my_fear_of_flying/">life</a>, and even been subjected to a <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/what_should_steve_kornacki_wear/">makeover</a>. After all of that, it seems, he's ready for his own TV show.</p><p>Salon's Steve Kornacki has been announced as the new host of MSNBC's weekend "Up," the very best reason to get up early on a weekend since "Schoolhouse Rock!" (Host Chris Hayes, of course, gets <a href="http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/03/14/chris-hayes-to-take-over-8-p-m-show-on-msnbc/">the move</a> to prime time.) We're thrilled for Steve, and will be riveted to his debut.</p><p>On the same week when onetime Salon reporter Jake Tapper  launched his own <a href="http://cnnpressroom.blogs.cnn.com/category/cnn/cnn-shows-cnn/the-lead-with-jake-tapper/">CNN show</a>, we're making bets on who will next blow up the small screen. (Even odds: Pareene joins "The View.")</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/steve_kornacki_blows_up/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/steve_kornacki_blows_up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawrence O&#8217;Donnell: &#8220;Every show we do offends my artistic sensibilities&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/lawrence_odonnell_every_show_we_do_offends_my_artistic_sensibilities/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/lawrence_odonnell_every_show_we_do_offends_my_artistic_sensibilities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 15:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olympus has fallen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the west wing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawrence o'donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ashley Judd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13229355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The MSNBC anchor misses show business so desperately that "I will do anything short of pornography" to be on set]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lawrence O'Donnell is, even by the standards of MSNBC anchors, a busy guy. The host of "The Last Word" (which airs nightly at 10 p.m.), O'Donnell has long enjoyed a sideline career as an actor, appearing in the television series "Big Love," "Homeland," and "Monk," among others; he also served as an executive producer for "The West Wing."</p><p>The news anchor is about to hit movie screens in perhaps his highest-profile cameo yet, as a news anchor (for a generic news network, explicitly not MSNBC) in the action drama "Olympus Has Fallen," which depicts an attack by North Koreans upon the White House and features Aaron Eckhart and potential Senate candidate Ashley Judd as the president and first lady. We spoke to O'Donnell about his unusual career, why Jim Lehrer would never do what he does, and his future in Hollywood.</p><p><strong>Why do you say yes when offered films? The director of "Olympus Has Fallen" told us that he'd reached out to many news anchors, including CNN's Don Lemon, and only you were able to do it. </strong></p><p><strong></strong>Because I miss show business so desperately that I will do anything short of pornography at this point to hang around sets and have fun.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/lawrence_odonnell_every_show_we_do_offends_my_artistic_sensibilities/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/lawrence_odonnell_every_show_we_do_offends_my_artistic_sensibilities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meet the man who is always &#8220;absolutely right&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/meet_the_man_who_is_always_absolutely_right/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/meet_the_man_who_is_always_absolutely_right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 20:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[martin bashir]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mediaite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Greenwald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guardian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[andrew kirell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libertarians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13229287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MSNBC's impassioned host Martin Bashir delivers questions like soliloquies. And his guests couldn't agree more]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/youre-absolutely-right-martin-gaze-into-the-liberal-bubble-that-is-martin-bashirs-msnbc-show/">Mediaite's Andrew Kirell, a self-described libertarian, has been on the Martin Bashir beat</a>, calling the host's 4 p.m. show on <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/finally-even-the-liberal-media-recognizes-the-nightmare-that-is-martin-bashirs-msnbc-show/">its "lack of liberal introspectiveness."</a> But Kirell discovered, tipped off by the Guardian (and former Salon) columnist Glenn Greenwald, that Bashir has his fans. Not just fans -- guests who affirm everything out of their host's mouth. Mediaite assembled this montage.</p><p><iframe src="http://videos.mediaite.com/embed/player/3SK1BP1YTCLQ313Z" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" width="420" height="421"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/meet_the_man_who_is_always_absolutely_right/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/meet_the_man_who_is_always_absolutely_right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chris Hayes to replace Ed Schultz in prime-time slot</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/chris_hayes_to_replace_ed_schultz_in_prime_time_slot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/chris_hayes_to_replace_ed_schultz_in_prime_time_slot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 17:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Hayes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Schultz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Up With Chris Hayes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rachel Maddow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Left]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunday morning shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ezra Klein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pundits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13229047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MSNBC announced their latest move as it struggles to dominate the 25 to 54 demographic]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris Hayes is ready for his close-up.</p><p>The hip, bespectacled journalist is preparing to take over the covetable 8 p.m. time slot vacated by Ed Schultz's "The Ed Show" — network executives have moved Schultz to Saturday and Sunday evenings. Hayes has hosted "Up With Chris Hayes" since September 2011, and established quite a following in less than two years of carrying a show.</p><p>"Chris has done an amazing job creating a franchise on weekend morning," network president Phil Griffin said in a statement. "He’s an extraordinary talent and has made a strong connection with our audience. This is an exciting time for MSNBC."</p><p>Griffin is banking on Hayes -- and possible Hayes's morning slot replacement Ezra Klein -- to make MSNBC a household name. Well, a <em>liberal</em> household name, at least. “Our awareness level, people who can define who we are, is much lower than Fox and CNN,” Mr. Griffin <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/12/business/media/msnbc-its-ratings-rising-gains-ground-on-fox-news.html?pagewanted=all&amp;_r=0%22" target="_blank">told</a> the New York Times. The network president has been building out a brand identity through the steady recruitment of ever-younger, ever-more progressive on-air talent. Of the network's gravitation to the left, former President Bill Clinton remarked, “Boy, it really has become our version of Fox.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/chris_hayes_to_replace_ed_schultz_in_prime_time_slot/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/chris_hayes_to_replace_ed_schultz_in_prime_time_slot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>David Axelrod joins NBC News</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/david_axelrod_joins_nbc_news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/david_axelrod_joins_nbc_news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Axelrod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13205422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former White House adviser will be a senior political analyst for MSNBC and NBC News]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Axelrod, a former senior adviser to President Obama, will join NBC News and MSNBC as a senior political analyst across "all broadcasts and platforms of both networks," according to the network.</p><p>He joins former White House press secretary Robert Gibbs, who <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2013/02/robert-gibbs-named-nbc-msnbc-contributor-156833.html">signed on</a> as a contributor to both networks last month.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/david_axelrod_joins_nbc_news/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/david_axelrod_joins_nbc_news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>