<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Muslim Women</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/muslim_women/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Isn&#8217;t that a terrorist?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/10/voice_of_witness_sara/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/10/voice_of_witness_sara/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 00:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim Women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/2011/09/09/voice_of_witness_sara</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, it's a young girl. And with her father jailed on questionable terror-related charges, she's growing up alone]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
    <em>Every day through Sept. 11, we'll offer a new story from "Patriot Acts: Narratives of Post-9/11 Injustice," about men and women caught in the war on terror's crossfire.</em>
  </p><p>
    <em>Sara Jayyousi, now 15, was just 9 years old when her father, Kifah, was arrested in March 2005 and charged with providing material support to terrorists and with conspiracy to murder, kidnap and maim in a foreign country. The charges against him were the result of charitable contributions he made to an organization in Bosnia in the 1990s. Prior to his arrest, Kifah had been chief facilities director for the Washington, D.C., public school system, and then an adjunct professor at Wayne State University. He had also served in the U.S. Navy. When he was convicted in 2007, the judge noted for the record that there was no evidence linking Sara&#8217;s dad to specific acts of violence anywhere. The judge also said that he was &#8220;the kind of neighbor that people would want in a community.&#8221; In June 2008, Kifah was transferred to the federal Communications Management Unit (CMU) in Terre Haute, Ind.</em>
  </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/10/voice_of_witness_sara/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/10/voice_of_witness_sara/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Saudi fatwa on female cashiers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/01/fatwa_cashiers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/01/fatwa_cashiers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 22:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim Women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/11/01/fatwa_cashiers</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The country's clerics continue their crusade against all womanly temptations]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saudi Arabia's clerics are doing a stellar job of undermining the government's attempts at softening the country's extremist image. A couple months back, the labor ministry moved to allow women to work as cashiers, but it was <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5irDk4IKFpmvRfl9fMCE2VwabyFrw?docId=CNG.90fcc3fb8fe0939f953755a219011833.d91">reported Monday</a> that a fatwa has been issued against allowing the female kind behind the register at grocery stores.</p><p>The ruling from the Council of Senior Scholars explained, "It is necessary to keep away from places where men congregate. Women should look for decent work that does not make it possible for them to attract men or be attracted by men." Way to give women options! According to my calculations, that leaves three choices: 1.) Don't work, 2.) Work from home or 3.) Work at an all-female business. As for the final option, take into consideration that men are allowed to fill gigs at even the most lady-centric of stores -- <a href="http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/287546">like lingerie shops</a> (although there is a <a href="http://www.emirates247.com/news/region/saudi-women-step-up-drive-against-lingerie-salesmen-2010-10-13-1.303312">female-led protest underway</a> against male panty purveyors).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/01/fatwa_cashiers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/01/fatwa_cashiers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Orthodox Jews defend the burqa</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/21/orthodox_jews_niqab/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/21/orthodox_jews_niqab/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 21:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim Women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/10/21/orthodox_jews_niqab</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Muslim women in Quebec have found a new ally in the fight against a ban on the full face veil]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Muslim women in Quebec have won a new ally in the fight against a proposed ban on the burqa: Orthodox Jews. The Jewish Orthodox Council for Community Relations argues that the measure, which would restrict anyone from wearing the full face veil while receiving government services, problematically prioritizes gender rights over religious rights, reports <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/orthodox-jews-urge-quebec-to-abandon-proposed-niqab-ban/article1766182/">The Globe and Mail.</a></p><p>The Orthodox Council is taking a stand on principle, but it's also fueled by fear that Jewish religious practices will be targeted next. It's a reasonable concern: If the government outlaws Quebecers from veiling in certain contexts, what's to stop it from forbidding any number of the sartorial symbols of Hasidim? Indeed, if the bill is passed with the intent of strictly maintaining secularism, one would expect other religious expressions to be outlawed as well.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/21/orthodox_jews_niqab/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/21/orthodox_jews_niqab/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the hijab returning to Turkey?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/19/turkey_veil/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/19/turkey_veil/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 00:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim Women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/10/18/turkey_veil</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The country's education board warns Istanbul University against expelling women for veiling]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The days of Muslim university students in Turkey wearing wigs over their headscarves and covering up with oversize baseball caps might be numbered. In response to a letter of complaint written by Zeynep Nur Incekara, a med student who was twice kicked out of class for flouting the unofficial ban on veiling in universities, the country's Higher Education Board has instructed Istanbul University that it can no longer expel students for violating the dress code.</p><p>There is no actual anti-hijab clause in Turkey's Constitution, "but through a tricky piece of legal interpretation coined 'interpretative refusal,' the headscarf has always fallen into a gray area," <a href="http://www.minnpost.com/globalpost/2010/10/18/22406/some_universities_in_turkey_ignore_ban_on_hijab_in_public_spaces">explains</a> the MinnPost. Some universities have taken to exploiting that gray area, but no more -- at least not at Istanbul University, for now.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/19/turkey_veil/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/19/turkey_veil/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Muslim women can veil in court</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/13/niqab_court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/13/niqab_court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 23:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim Women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/10/13/niqab_court</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Canadian appeals court rules that witnesses have a right to wear a niqab in most cases]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Canadian court issued a ruling today on whether Muslim women can be forced to remove their niqab while testifying and, lo and behold, both sides of the debate are happy. That's because the Ontario Court of Appeal determined that a witness is allowed to refuse to bare her face unless -- unless! -- the fairness of the trial depends on it. The judges' ruling reads in part:</p><blockquote>
<p>There is no getting around the reality that in some cases, particularly those involving trial by jury where a witness's credibility is central to the outcome, a judge will have a difficult decision to make. If, in the specific circumstances, the accused's fair trial right can be honoured only by requiring the witness to remove the niqab, the niqab must be removed if the witness is to testify.</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/13/niqab_court/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/13/niqab_court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disney, Muslim worker agree on scarf substitute</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/27/disney_muslim_worker/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/27/disney_muslim_worker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim Women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/09/27/disney_muslim_worker</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The park will allow a specially designed headscarf after initially objecting to her religious head covering]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disney is allowing a Muslim employee at its Southern California park to wear a specially designed headscarf after initially objecting to her religious head covering.</p><p>The Council on American-Islamic Relations said Monday that 22-year-old Noor Abdallah was told she couldn't wear the hijab while working as a vacation planner at a Disneyland Resort Esplanade ticket booth. She declined to take another job away from the public.</p><p>Disneyland spokeswoman Suzi Brown says the park worked with Abdallah to design a covering to match her costume and meet her religious needs. She's been wearing a blue scarf topped with a beret since early this month.</p><p>Brown says the case is separate from that of another Muslim Disney worker who refused to accept a costume headpiece and filed a federal discrimination complaint.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/09/27/disney_muslim_worker/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/27/disney_muslim_worker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The burqa battle Down Under</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/20/australia_burqa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/20/australia_burqa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 18:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim Women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/09/20/australia_burqa</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The debate over the controversial garment is raging in Australia, and it reveals some surprising common ground]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Move over Europe, Australia has its very own battle brewing over the veil. On Sunday, Aussie Muslims rallied against recent attempts to introduce a measure to outlaw the burqa and niqab. For the most part, the arguments on either side are familiar and can best be summed up with, "Yeah, what France said." But there was one statement from a pro-veiling activist yesterday that did stand out -- because it departed from the usual defense about "freedom of choice." According to the <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/its-unaustralian--rally-condemns-push-to-ban-burqa-20100919-15hy0.html">Sydney Morning Herald</a>, Fautmeh Ardati told protesters:</p><blockquote>
<p>[T]o use freedom of choice as a justification, then we are also accepting of women who undress out of this same freedom of choice, and we can never do this as Muslim women. We dress like this because it is the command of Allah, not any man.</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/09/20/australia_burqa/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/20/australia_burqa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Graffiti flouts France&#8217;s burqa ban</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/17/princess_hijab/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/17/princess_hijab/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim Women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/09/17/princess_hijab</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In light of the push to remove the full face veil from public, Princess Hijab's street art takes on new meaning]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the wake of <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet/2010/09/14/veil_ban/index.html">France's approval of the burqa ban</a>, a short documentary is circulating about Princess Hijab, a graffiti artist who sneaks around Paris drawing veils on models in subway advertisements. She claims to have no political agenda, and she's been on her veiling mission since 2006, but her project is taking on new meaning in light of the country's push to remove burqas from public spaces. The film only adds to that: We see her cover up well-oiled male underwear models with her black marker, and there are closeup shots of the surveillance cameras that are meant to protect the ads from her guerrilla modesty campaign. There's plenty of potent symbolism to be found.</p><p>Sarkozy's anti-veil campaign just might succeed, but he won't be able to fine these burqa-clad models.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/09/17/princess_hijab/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/17/princess_hijab/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>French Senate passes veil ban</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/14/veil_ban/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/14/veil_ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 19:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim Women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/09/14/veil_ban</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But the bill could still face challenges. Also: What would Sarkozy make of recent reports of veiled Hasidim?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's official: The veil ban <a href="http://www.nationalpost.com/news/France+bans+full+veils+public/3523506/story.html">has passed</a> the French Senate. The law, which imposes either a hefty fine or citizenship classes on those caught wearing the full veil, now faces one final hurdle:&#160;the constitutional court. (Drats, that pesky constitution.) It's also vulnerable to "a challenge from the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, where decisions are binding," the BBC <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-11305033">reports.</a> In fact, France's top administrative court previously <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-09-14/french-parliament-completes-passage-of-law-banning-full-facial-veils.html">warned</a> that the ban might be a violation of personals freedom. (Drats, those pesky personal freedoms.) These potential interferences aside, though, there will be a six month grace period and then the crackdown begins.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/09/14/veil_ban/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/14/veil_ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Park 51 reaction impacts young U.S. Muslims</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/29/us_nyc_mosque_fallout/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/29/us_nyc_mosque_fallout/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 16:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Park51]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/08/29/us_nyc_mosque_fallout</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adnan Zulfiqar, a graduate student, former U.S. Senate aide and American-born son of Pakistani immigrants, will soon give the first khutbah, or sermon, of the fall semester at the University of Pennsylvania. His topic has presented itself in the daily headlines and blog posts over the disputed mosque near ground zero. What else could he [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adnan Zulfiqar, a graduate student, former U.S. Senate aide and American-born son of Pakistani immigrants, will soon give the first khutbah, or sermon, of the fall semester at the University of Pennsylvania. His topic has presented itself in the daily headlines and blog posts over the disputed mosque near ground zero.</p><p>What else could he choose, he says, after a summer remembered not for its reasoned debate, but for epithets, smears, even violence?</p><p>As he writes, Zulfiqar frets over the potential fallout and what he and other Muslim leaders can do about it. Will young Muslims conclude they are second-class citizens in the U.S. now and always?</p><p>"They're already struggling to balance, 'I'm American, I'm Muslim,' and their ethnic heritage. It's very disconcerting," said Zulfiqar, 32, who worked for former U.S. Sen. Max Cleland, a Georgia Democrat, and now serves Penn's campus ministry. "A controversy like this can make them radical or become more conservative in how they look at things or how they fit into the American picture."</p><p>Whatever the outcome, the uproar over a planned Islamic center near the former World Trade Center site is shaping up as a signal event in the story of American Islam.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/08/29/us_nyc_mosque_fallout/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/29/us_nyc_mosque_fallout/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iranian facing death: &#8220;It&#8217;s because I&#8217;m a woman&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/06/ashtiani_quote/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/06/ashtiani_quote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 23:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim Women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/08/06/ashtiani_quote</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Guardian exclusively interviews the 43-year-old sentenced to be executed for adultery]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Guardian just went up with an <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/aug/06/sakineh-mohammadi-ashtiani-iran-interview">explosive interview</a> with Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani, the Iranian woman facing execution for adultery. As we <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet/2010/07/09/iran_stoning">wrote about before</a>, the 43-year-old was convicted of adultery and sentenced to death by stoning. After international outrage, her sentence was reduced to death by hanging (a win I'm sure she and her family were just&#160;<em>ecstatic</em>&#160;about). In her interview with the British newspaper, she explains why she still faces death while the man found guilty of murdering her husband roams free:</p><blockquote>
<p>The answer is quite simple, it's because I'm a woman, it's because they think they can do anything to women in this country. It's because for them adultery is worse than murder -- but not all kinds of adultery: an adulterous man might not even be imprisoned but an adulterous women is the end of the world for them. It's because I'm in a country where it's women do not have the right to divorce their husbands and are deprived of their basic rights.&#160;</p>
</blockquote><p>"It's because I'm a woman" -- now, that's just all there is to say about that.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/08/06/ashtiani_quote/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/06/ashtiani_quote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>71</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did veiled women violate airport security?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/03/burqa_plane/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/03/burqa_plane/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 00:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/08/02/burqa_plane</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A YouTube video allegedly shows Air Canada agents allowing Muslim women to board a plane without being ID'ed]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to a video&#160;posted on YouTube, Canadian officials are investigating a claim that veiled passengers were allowed to board a flight at&#160;Montreal's Pierre Elliott Trudeau Airport earlier this month without showing their faces. A&#160;British traveler captured footage on his cellphone that appears to show two women wearing niqabs breezing right by an Air Canada agent as the man they're traveling with hands over their passports for them.</p><p>If all is truly as it seems, then the agents didn't follow the airline's usual practice of ID'ing all passengers at the final checkpoint before boarding a flight. In the case of veiled women,&#160;Air Canada trains employees to conduct a screening in a private area. That said, an airline spokesperson told the <a href="http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Ottawa+reviewing+allegations+veiled+passengers+boarded+flight+without/3350505/story.html">Vancouver Sun</a>: "In Canada, airline passenger screening is the responsibility of [Canadian Air Transport Security Authority] and passengers have already undergone multiple security checks before arriving at the gate." But&#160;Federal Transport Minister John Baird was quick to voice strong disapproval: "If the reports are true, the situation is deeply disturbing and poses a serious threat to the security of the air traveling public."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/08/03/burqa_plane/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/03/burqa_plane/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Muslim court clause brings spotlight in Kenya vote</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/30/af_kenya_muslim_courts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/30/af_kenya_muslim_courts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim Women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/07/30/af_kenya_muslim_courts</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Critics, including American evangelicals, say constitution could create tensions between Muslims and Christians]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A draft constitution that Kenya votes on next week guarantees women the same rights as men -- unless a judge in a Muslim family court decrees otherwise.</p><p>Critics, including some American evangelicals, complain that the document carves out too many exceptions for the country's Muslim minority and could create tensions between Muslims and Christians.</p><p>Creating a new constitution was a key part of a power-sharing deal that ended weeks of bloody riots 2 1/2 years ago. More than 1,000 people were killed in the violence after a disputed presidential election.</p><p>But the inclusion of the publicly funded Muslim courts has galvanized opposition among some Christians ahead of next Wednesday's vote. A clause in the bill -- which polls show is likely to pass -- grants equality to women, as long as it doesn't interfere with the application of Muslim law.</p><p>"All Kenyans should have the same rights regardless of ethnicity, religion or gender," said Oliver Kisaka, the deputy general secretary of the National Council of Churches in Kenya. "This is the unfair creation of a system within a system. And why should taxpayers pay for a judicial system that doesn't include them?"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/07/30/af_kenya_muslim_courts/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/30/af_kenya_muslim_courts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Saudi cleric: OK for women to show face in France</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/26/burqa_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/26/burqa_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim Women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/07/26/burqa</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Influential Sheikh Ayedh al-Garni slams the proposed burqa ban, but gives Muslims permission to obey it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This weekend <a href="http://content.usatoday.com/communities/ondeadline/post/2010/07/saudi-cleric-oks-muslim-women-uncovering-face-in-countries-that-ban-veils/1">brought news</a> for Muslim women in France:&#160;They are allowed to go out in public without a full veil. You might wonder how exactly this is news, seeing as the country's recent push for a burqa ban is all about forcing women to go unveiled in public -- but the pronouncement didn't come from the French government but rather an influential Saudi cleric.</p><p>Sheikh Ayedh al-Garni spoke out against the proposed ban, calling it "illogical and unreasonable," but conceded: "In case a ban is enforced against a Muslim woman there -- and as a consequence there is a reaction or negative implications or harassment or harm -- it is better for the Muslim woman to reveal her face." It isn't the most generous fatwa, considering that if the French law passes, they won't have much of a choice, regardless.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/07/26/burqa_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/26/burqa_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Egyptians battle over veil ban</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/11/02/veil_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/11/02/veil_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 22:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim Women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2009/11/02/veil</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an attack on rising Islamism, the niqab is cast out of state-run schools]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In yet another episode of What Not to Wear for Muslim Women, Egypt's state-run schools have banned the niqab in all-girl classrooms. As is always the case with sartorial edicts regarding women showing too much or too little skin, it's sparked <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2009/11/02/world/international-uk-egypt-niqab.html?_r=1">quite the furor.</a></p><p>It all began last month when Sheikh&#160;Mohamed Sayed Tantawi, head of Al Azhar University, visited a secondary school and ordered a female student to take off her full face veil. The niqab, he said, "is a tradition, it has no connection with religion.&#8221; Later, to drive home his point, he issued a fatwa against the niqab. Now, conservatives are speaking out against what they call a violation of their religious freedom.&#160;Rokaya Mohamed, a teacher at a state-run elementary school, wears the full face veil and told Reuters she would "rather die than take it off." She added: "I know what makes God and his prophet love me, and no sheikh is going to convince me otherwise."</p><p>She, and others like her, are especially uninterested in following the guidance of a state-supported cleric like Tantawi,&#160;who is part and parcel to the government's attempt to fight the growing&#160;influence of Islamism, particularly from Gulf states.&#160;The majority of Egyptian women choose to cover their hair, according to Reuters, but more and more women are opting for the severe niqab. As they do, more and more attempts are made to stamp out the practice.&#160;And so it goes --&#160;round and round, where it stops nobody knows.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/11/02/veil_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/11/02/veil_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cross-dressing in Saudi Arabia?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/05/14/saudi_love/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/05/14/saudi_love/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2008/05/14/saudi_love</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Girls are subverting strict limitations on their behavior and appearance in some surprising ways.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New York Times' two-part series on young love in Saudi Arabia (first from the view of <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/12/world/middleeast/12saudi.html?scp=1&amp;sq=Saudi+Nader+al-Mutairi+&amp;st=nyt">boys</a>, then <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/13/world/middleeast/13girls.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin">girls</a>) is a fascinating must-read -- but two anecdotes in particular demand mention here. Apparently, many young Saudi women are subverting the strict limitations placed on them by cross-dressing to enter "male spaces" and, what's more, having "passionate friendships, possibly even love affairs," with other girls. It's the religious police's worst fears realized! </p><p> Atheer Jassem al-Othman, an 18-year-old law student, tells the Times' Katherine Zoepf that two female classmates recently brought in photos of themselves disguised as boys. Zoepf writes:<br />
<blockquote></p><p>In the pictures, the girls wore thobes, the ankle-length white garments traditionally worn by Saudi men, and had covered their hair with the male headdresses called shmaghs. One of the girls had used an eyeliner pencil to give herself a grayish, stubble-like mist along her jaw line. </BLOCKQUOTE> </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/05/14/saudi_love/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/05/14/saudi_love/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does freedom to veil hurt women?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/02/11/turkey_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/02/11/turkey_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 19:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2008/02/11/turkey</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Turkish women are divided over the government's vote to overturn the head scarf ban.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thousands of protesters took to the streets Saturday in Turkey as the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/10/world/europe/10turkey.html?scp=92&sq=women&st=nyt ">Parliament voted</a> to revise the Constitution to allow women in public buildings to be veiled or not. Issues of secularism, religious freedom and women's rights are stirred into this scalding-hot pot of debate -- but even those leading the feminist fight disagree about the best way to defend women's rights. Many Muslim women are lobbying for the right to attend college or work for the state while following their religious belief in modesty. For instance, there's women's rights activist and lawyer <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/09/world/europe/09benli.html?pagewanted=1&sq=women&st=nyt&scp=96">Fatma Benli,</a> who has to send substitutes to defend her court cases, since she is banned from attending while wearing a hijab. She is one of the major players behind the push to repeal the ban and describes the head scarf as her "personality" and "wholeness." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/02/11/turkey_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/02/11/turkey_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The veil meets American pinup art</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/02/01/veil_art/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/02/01/veil_art/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 19:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim Women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2008/02/01/veil_art</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Artist Makan Emadi talks about his controversial "Islamic Erotica" series.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you get when you combine symbols of misogyny in the East and the West? As Iranian artist Makan Emadi imagines it, a Muslim woman clutching at her black chador as it blows above her knees, &agrave; la Marilyn Monroe in "The Seven Year Itch." Emadi's <a href="http://makangallery.com/Gallery.htm">"Islamic Erotica"</a> series depicts veiled Muslim women in sexualized poses that recall American pinup art and recently caught the eye of Zeynab at <a href="http://muslimahmediawatch.blogspot.com/2008/01/portrait-of-lady-paintings-by-makan.html">Muslimah Media Watch.</a> Feministing <a href="http://feministing.com/archives/008501.html">took note</a> and asked readers: "Is it a powerful critique of both Eastern and Western sexism? Or is it just perpetuating the worst Eastern and Western sexist stereotypes?" </p><p> Emadi spoke to Broadsheet by phone from his Los Angeles home about the burqa, feminist art and receiving death threats. </p><p> <b>I saw your "Islamic Erotica" series mentioned in an online discussion of "veil fetish art." Does your work belong in that category?</b>
<div style="float: left;width: 200px;margin-right: 10px"><img class='wp-image-10032674' src='http://media.salon.com/2008/02/story.jpg' />
<p style="color: #666;margin-top: 0;font-size: 12px">&copy; <a href="http://makangallery.com/Gallery.htm">Makan Emadi</a></p>
</div>
<p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/02/01/veil_art/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/02/01/veil_art/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Muslim women head to head, hijab to hijab</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/11/02/boxing_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/11/02/boxing_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 19:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boxing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim Women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2007/11/02/boxing</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Women's boxing emerges in certain Middle Eastern countries.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new saying could start circulating among Middle Eastern boxing rings: Float like a <strike>butterfly</strike> burqa, sting like a bee. </p><p> OK, Muslim women aren't exactly boxing in burqas, but they <i>are</i> knocking each other out in the ring while wearing hijabs. The Age <a href="http://www.theage.com.au/news/world/jordans-men-hand-the-gloves-over-to-women/2007/11/02/1193619144977.html">reports</a> that women's boxing has emerged in certain Middle Eastern countries -- like Algeria, Egypt, Jordan, Morocco, Syria and Tunisia. Keep in mind, though, that women's boxing in the <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/middle_east/" />Middle East</a> hasn't arisen because of changing attitudes toward women but because of changing sporting standards -- a country cannot enter male boxers into Olympic competitions unless it has a women's team in the same sport. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/11/02/boxing_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/11/02/boxing_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cleric: Your sexy outfit is killing me!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/11/01/cleric/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/11/01/cleric/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 17:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim Women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2007/11/01/cleric</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Malaysian fundamentalist Muslim says women's immodest wear is causing men private pain.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Breaking news out of Malaysia: Women are emotionally abusing Muslim men by wearing immodest, Western-style dress, according to fundamentalist cleric Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat. The Islamic Party of Malaysia member says that women's clothing choices are causing the country's men private pain, and he has resolved to <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article2781287.ece">finally shed light</a> on these unseen victims of sartorial abuse. "We always [hear about] the abuse of children and wives in households, which is easily perceived by the eye but the emotional abuse of men cannot be seen," he said. "Our prayers become unfocused and our sleep is often disturbed." </p><p> I'm sure this isn't the last we'll hear from Aziz, who previously suggested that Malaysian women only wear lipstick or perfume if they felt like getting raped. Shine on, you crazy cleric, shine on. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/11/01/cleric/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/11/01/cleric/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>123</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

