<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Nancy Pelosi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/nancy_pelosi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Pelosi: GOP needs immigration reform to win the presidency again</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/30/pelosi_gop_needs_immigration_reform_to_win_the_presidency_again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/30/pelosi_gop_needs_immigration_reform_to_win_the_presidency_again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2013 17:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13346629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["It’s certainly right for the Republicans if they ever want to win a presidential race," she said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi urged the House to pass immigration reform, saying that it's "right for our country," but also right for Republicans if they ever hope to win another presidential race.</p><p>"I believe that the members of Congress, many more than are directly affected themselves by the number of Hispanics in their district, will do what is right for our country,” Pelosi, D-Calif., said on NBC's "Meet the Press" on Sunday. “And it’s certainly right, for the Republicans, if they ever want to win a presidential race.”</p><p>The immigration reform measure that passed out of the Senate last week is currently under consideration by the House, where it is unpopular among conservative Republicans. Republican leadership has indicated that they may not pass the full Senate version, but could pass legislation piecemeal instead.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/30/pelosi_gop_needs_immigration_reform_to_win_the_presidency_again/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/30/pelosi_gop_needs_immigration_reform_to_win_the_presidency_again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pelosi: Hillary Clinton &#8220;would win&#8221; the 2016 presidential race</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/pelosi_hillary_clinton_would_win_the_2016_presidential_race/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/pelosi_hillary_clinton_would_win_the_2016_presidential_race/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13339899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["I don't know why she wouldn't run," said the House Minority Leader]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though she's not yet making any official endorsements for the 2016 presidential race, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., was extremely optimistic about a potential run by Hillary Clinton. "If Secretary Clinton were to run — and we think if she ran, she would win — I believe that she would be the best-prepared person to enter the White House in decades, in decades," Pelosi said, "with all due respect to her husband, present company and other presidents."</p><p>Pelosi was speaking on <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/06/27/nancy-pelosi-says-democrats-coalescing-behind-hillary-clinton-2016/2464189/">USA Today's</a> "Capital Download," and said that though she's "not making endorsements right now, because I don't think that's appropriate," among Democrats "[t]here's a great deal of excitement about the prospect that she would run."</p><p>As USA Today points out, at the end of the 2008 primary campaign, Pelosi had a slightly different take:</p><blockquote><p>In 2008, Pelosi was House speaker and stayed officially neutral in the primary battle between Clinton and Barack Obama. She drew ire from Clinton's campaign with a comment that it would be "harmful" for unelected "superdelegates" to determine the nomination. At that key moment, support from superdelegates was seen as the only way Clinton might prevail.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/pelosi_hillary_clinton_would_win_the_2016_presidential_race/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/pelosi_hillary_clinton_would_win_the_2016_presidential_race/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pelosi dismisses Bachmann&#8217;s take on DOMA: &#8220;Who cares?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/pelosi_dismisses_bachmanns_take_on_doma_who_cares/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/pelosi_dismisses_bachmanns_take_on_doma_who_cares/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 20:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DoMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposition 8]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13338073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["No man, not even a Supreme Court, can undo what a holy God has instituted," Michele Bachmann had said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi had no time for questions about Rep. Michele Bachmann's response to the Supreme Court's <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/supreme_court_strikes_down_doma/">decision</a> that DOMA is unconstitutional. "Who cares?" Pelosi, D-Calif., scoffed in a press conference.</p><p>Bachmann, R-Minn., had put out a <a href="http://bachmann.house.gov/press-release/bachmann-responds-supreme-court-ruling-doma">statement</a> in response to the ruling, saying that "Marriage was created by the hand of God. No man, not even a Supreme Court, can undo what a holy God has instituted."</p><p>Watch, via <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/watch-nancy-pelosis-awesome-reaction-to-michele-bachmann-doma-statement-who-cares/">Mediaite</a>:</p><p><iframe src="http://videos.mediaite.com/embed/player/?content=84DGTB1LV5J8R2PR&content_type=content_item&layout=&playlist_cid=&widget_type_cid=svp&read_more=1" width="420" height="421" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0" scrolling="no" allowtransparency="true"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/pelosi_dismisses_bachmanns_take_on_doma_who_cares/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/pelosi_dismisses_bachmanns_take_on_doma_who_cares/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>112</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House of Representatives: Still terrible at everything</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/house_of_representatives_still_terrible_at_everything/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/house_of_representatives_still_terrible_at_everything/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 16:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Farm Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13332562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[House GOP's use of cheap tricks and a backup plan called "blaming Democrats" fails to avert farm bill humiliation]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow or other, the U.S. government, for the first time in years, is close-ish to being functional. Don't read too heavily into that word "functional." The government is not and will not probably be moving on your pet issue any time soon, sorry. But the Senate is actually <em>moving,</em> on bipartisan pieces of legislation that are in the public spotlight: a farm bill, a comprehensive immigration bill. GOP senators who typically pretend to negotiate compromises and then run for the hills once they near a motion to proceed, like Lindsey Graham and Bob Corker, are suddenly seeing out those compromises. One of the two houses of Congress, in our lifetime, may well be nearing the minimum threshold for competence.</p><p>Now then, what's the problem? Oh right, it's the House of Representatives, which is terrible at everything, and offers no indication of being any other way until at least 2023. Let's give some credit: They're adept at passing go-nowhere bills to repeal Obamacare or ban abortion or tattoo the words "Under God" to every baby's forehead. Great work there from the House Republican Party. On issues that might appeal to an even slightly broader cross-section of the country, though, they've got nothing. You know this. You've seen the same routine in nearly every important vote since 2009. Remember that time the government considered arbitrarily defaulting on the public debt and destroying the global economy forever? That was a head-scratcher for the House; took some real "working out" before they concluded it would best be averted, <em>for now.</em></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/house_of_representatives_still_terrible_at_everything/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/house_of_representatives_still_terrible_at_everything/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>68</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservatives rally behind MSM&#8217;s Howard Kurtz</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/conservatives_rally_behind_msms_howard_kurtz/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/conservatives_rally_behind_msms_howard_kurtz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 17:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Kurtz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily Beast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Drudge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breitbart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Podhoretz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13288819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why isn't the right rushing to skewer this lamestream media figure? Hint: It has to do with the gays]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You would expect Howard Kurtz' departure from the Daily Beast to be fodder for conservative critics of the liberal mainstream media, but probably not in this way.</p><p>The problem they seem to have with the incident is not that Kurtz falsely accused openly gay NBA player Jason Collins of concealing his engagement to a woman, or that he spread himself too thin and let the quality of his work suffer, but that the Daily Beast fired Kurtz for it. Here's popular conservative blogger Ace of Spades, <a href="http://minx.cc/?post=339639">spelling out</a> what many saw as a double standard:</p><blockquote><p>Clearly Kurtz erred, and rather dumbly. But he does this a lot, and no one's had a problem with it in the past. Why now? I think it's pretty obvious -- Jason Collins is now the Gay Black Sandra Fluke, and therefore now An Hero, and the Left protects its heroes.</p></blockquote><p>And John Nolte of Breitbart News:</p><blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Kurtz's sin was making this error with a sacred cow. Had he made EXACT same error with a Palin or Bachmann, media &amp; Beast woulda shrugged.</p> <p>— John Nolte(@NolteNC) <a href="https://twitter.com/NolteNC/status/330043653521301504">May 2, 2013</a></p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/conservatives_rally_behind_msms_howard_kurtz/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/conservatives_rally_behind_msms_howard_kurtz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pelosi to Salon: They had to take me down</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/pelosi_to_salon_they_had_to_take_me_down/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/pelosi_to_salon_they_had_to_take_me_down/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women in politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women in Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13249184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The House minority leader talks about female leadership and whether the GOP can woo women ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You remember the Republicans' 2010 midterm campaign message: Nancy Pelosi, <a href="http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/03/23/rnc-head-michael-steele-defends-fiery-anti-pelosi-ad/">engulfed in flames</a>, demon-like. Nancy Pelosi, in charge, bossing you around with her crazy liberal values. An official "Fire Pelosi" bus tour sponsored by the Republican National Committee, and the specter of her leadership <a href="http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2010/10/05/101640/why-do-republicans-love-to-demonize.html">invoked</a> in ad after ad.</p><p>All of this was a key Republican strategy in taking back the House, and while there were lots of reasons the Democrats lost and Pelosi was dethroned, it achieved the desired result. Since the next big electoral battle will be control of the House in 2014, and a Democratic win would presumably put Pelosi back in charge, expect to see more Pelosi boogeyman-ing.</p><p>"It didn't bother me, I figured they thought I was effective and therefore they had to take me down," Pelosi told Salon at the premiere Thursday night of "Fall to Grace," her daughter's HBO documentary on former New Jersey Gov. Jim McGreevey. Still, she worries about the message it sends to other women who might be considering a run.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/pelosi_to_salon_they_had_to_take_me_down/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/pelosi_to_salon_they_had_to_take_me_down/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>68</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Joe Scarborough apologizes for Pelosi-Iraq War comments</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/joe_scarborough_apologizes_for_pelosi_iraq_war_comments/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/joe_scarborough_apologizes_for_pelosi_iraq_war_comments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 20:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Scarborough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morning Joe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13248328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On "Morning Joe," Scarborough issued a correction for saying Pelosi was "beating the drums of war"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Thursday's "Morning Joe," Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski <a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/03/19/morning-joe-wrong-on-pelosi-beating-the-drums-o/193124">apologized</a> and issued a correction for showing selectively edited footage of Nancy Pelosi that Scarborough described as Pelosi "beating the drums of war."</p><p>Salon's Alex Pareene <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/msnbc_selectively_remembers_the_iraq_war/">pointed out</a> that in a video segment to commemorate the Iraq War, Scarborough had said in a voice-over that "the very same people who spent years beating up George Bush were the very ones beating the drum for Iraq's regime change and Saddam Hussein's ouster." The video then shows Pelosi saying, "I applaud the president's focusing on this issue, and on taking the lead to disarm Saddam Hussein," but leaves out her remarks afterward that "I rise in opposition to this resolution on national security grounds."</p><p>"In fact, it seems like she got it just about right," Scarborough said in Thursday's segment, as he and Brzezinski apologized.</p><p>Watch:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/joe_scarborough_apologizes_for_pelosi_iraq_war_comments/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/joe_scarborough_apologizes_for_pelosi_iraq_war_comments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Security and Medicare aren&#8217;t bargaining chips</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/social_security_and_medicaid_arent_bargaining_chips_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/social_security_and_medicaid_arent_bargaining_chips_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 15:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RobertReich.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13247876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Democrats can't afford to sell out two of the most popular programs ever devised by the federal government]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prominent Democrats — including the President and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi — are openly suggesting that Medicare be means-tested and Social Security payments be reduced by applying a lower adjustment for inflation.</p><p>This is even before they’ve started budget negotiations with Republicans — who still refuse to raise taxes on the rich, close tax loopholes the rich depend on (such as hedge-fund and private-equity managers’ “carried interest”), increase capital gains taxes on the wealthy, cap their tax deductions, or tax financial transactions.</p><p>It’s not the first time Democrats have led with a compromise, but these particular pre-concessions are especially unwise.</p><p>For over thirty years Republicans have pitted the middle class against the poor, preying on the frustrations and racial biases of average working people who can’t get ahead no matter how hard they try. In the Republican narrative, government takes from the hard-working middle and gives to the undeserving and dependent needy.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/social_security_and_medicaid_arent_bargaining_chips_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/social_security_and_medicaid_arent_bargaining_chips_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nancy Pelosi: We need more women in politics</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/nancy_pelosi_we_need_to_make_our_own_environment_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/nancy_pelosi_we_need_to_make_our_own_environment_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 15:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feministing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women in politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Childcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance Reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13226556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The House Minority Leader discusses feminism, Nancy Drew and how we can create an environment that empowers women]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.feministing.com"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/feministing_logo-1.jpg" alt="Feministing" /></a></p><p>Nancy Pelosi is the first woman in history to serve as Speaker of the House, aka the next person in the Presidential line of succession after the Vice President. She was Speaker from 2007 until 2011, and is now the Minority Leader.</p><p>Before she was Speaker, a role in which she was crucial to the passage of the Affordable Care Act (“Obamacare”), she was also the first woman in history to serve as Minority Whip. She also served on the House intelligence and appropriations committees. She’s been in electoral politics longer than I’ve been on the planet, and she has five kids. She’s pro-choice, has a 0% rating from the NRA, and doesn’t take any shit from anyone. She’s a 72-year-old badass. Oh, and she <em>loves</em> chocolate milkshakes.</p><p>We spoke earlier this week, a few hours before President Obama signed the reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act into law.</p><p>This woman barely needs an introduction, which is why this one is so short, so now, without further ado, the Feministing Five, with Nancy Pelosi.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/nancy_pelosi_we_need_to_make_our_own_environment_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/nancy_pelosi_we_need_to_make_our_own_environment_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York&#8217;s finest Islamophobes</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/new_yorks_finest_islamophobes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/new_yorks_finest_islamophobes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 20:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray Kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13225402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new report sheds light on NYPD’s secret surveillance of Muslim communities. And what it reveals about liberals]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine living in a small American community, innocently minding your own business, while constantly worrying that your government is monitoring how you meet with others in your community, speak about your faith, express political views, and dress — for hints that you are a terrorist. As seen by a report released today, such harassment and violations of civil liberties are constant facts of life for American Muslims today.</p><p>The new report, <em><a href="http://aaldef.org/press-releases/press-release/march-11-press-conference-to-deliver-the-report-mapping-muslims-nypd-spying-and-its-impact-on-americ.html" target="_blank">Mapping Muslims</a></em>, analyzes the effects of the New York Police Department (NYPD)’s infiltration into every facet of Muslim communities, from mosques, local shops, college organizations and more. The report -- released by the Muslim American Civil Liberties Coalition (MACLC), the Creating Law Enforcement and Accountability Project (CLEAR) and the Asian American Legal Defense Fund (AALDEF) -- interviewed 57 Muslims, mostly living in New York City. The interviewees included high school and college students, community organizers, lawyers, teachers, shopkeepers and others.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/new_yorks_finest_islamophobes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/new_yorks_finest_islamophobes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Karl Rove’s Ashley Judd problem</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/karl_rove%e2%80%99s_ashley_judd_problem/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/karl_rove%e2%80%99s_ashley_judd_problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ashley Judd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caroline Kennedy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13204765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The big loser of the 2012 campaign cycle is incapable of helping his party close the gender gap]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When activist and actress Ashley Judd recently announced she was mulling a run for Senate against Mitch McConnell in Kentucky, Karl Rove revealed a strategy to undermine her. It would be one he’d used before with women candidates. “We’re making fun of her,” he explained.</p><p>Give him points for honesty. The key concept behind his super PAC’s first attack ad of the new election cycle was indeed to belittle the high-profile, politically active Judd. Rove and American Crossroads GPS dropped $10,000 to “stick a pin in her balloon,” going up with a satiric Judd for Senate campaign spot that portrays her as an airhead, a “leader who knows how to follow,” and dismisses her as a silly Hollywood liberal.</p><p>Far from a unique personal shot at Judd, the attack is part of a long pattern of Rove attacking women in troubling ways rhetorically distinct from his campaigns against male candidates.</p><p>One can say that he is an equal opportunity smear artist, but there is a context and a history to Rove's anti-Judd salvo. He routinely resorts to anti-woman insults and insinuations that cut deeper than his usual attacks – characterizing women in politics as having stereotypically negative female traits (subject to hysteria, too emotional, weak and weepy, bleeding heart, flighty or frigid, and lesbian).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/karl_rove%e2%80%99s_ashley_judd_problem/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/karl_rove%e2%80%99s_ashley_judd_problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alexandra Pelosi: &#8220;If it’s guilt or shame — Jim McGreevey’s actually doing some good in the world&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/18/alexandra_pelosi_if_it%e2%80%99s_guilt_or_shame_%e2%80%94_jim_mcgreevey%e2%80%99s_actually_doing_some_good_in_the_world/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/18/alexandra_pelosi_if_it%e2%80%99s_guilt_or_shame_%e2%80%94_jim_mcgreevey%e2%80%99s_actually_doing_some_good_in_the_world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 21:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alexandra pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jim mcgreevey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sundance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sundance Film Festival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redemption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forgiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[george bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13174337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi's Emmy-winning daughter believes in redemption. And she's made a career of documenting it in action]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alexandra Pelosi doesn't come to a film festival struggling to woo backers or hoping to attract distributors. For the past 13 years, the youngest child of House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi has been employed by HBO, which has enabled her to make the documentaries that have compelled her most and cover the kinds of political topics that keep America up late at night: homelessness, immigration and naturalization, the evangelical community and, with her latest film, women’s jails, recidivism, homosexuality in the Catholic and Episcopal churches and, in no small measure, redemption. Best known for getting on the campaign bus with then-presidential candidate George W. Bush for her Emmy-winning “Journeys with George” to her doc about the closeted evangelical, "The Trials of Ted Haggard," she has just arrived at Sundance to present her latest documentary, “Fall to Grace,” an 18-month study of former New Jersey governor Jim McGreevey.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/18/alexandra_pelosi_if_it%e2%80%99s_guilt_or_shame_%e2%80%94_jim_mcgreevey%e2%80%99s_actually_doing_some_good_in_the_world/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/18/alexandra_pelosi_if_it%e2%80%99s_guilt_or_shame_%e2%80%94_jim_mcgreevey%e2%80%99s_actually_doing_some_good_in_the_world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nancy Pelosi to guest star on &#8220;30 Rock&#8221; season finale</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/nancy_pelosi_to_guest_star_on_30_rock_season_finale/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/nancy_pelosi_to_guest_star_on_30_rock_season_finale/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 13:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[30 Rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tina Fey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The politician admits, “I would do almost anything Tina Fey asks me to do"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., has revealed that she will make an appearance on the hour-long season finale of Tina Fey's NBC comedy "30 Rock." Pelosi joins the ranks of Al Gore, former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, and Mayor Michael Bloomberg, all of whom have guest starred on the show. (And, if their cameos are any indication, Pelosi would play herself.)</p><p>But the politician didn't reveal any other details to the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/tv-column/post/exclusive-nancy-pelosi-to-guest-star-on-30-rock-series-finale/2013/01/03/b8447776-55ea-11e2-bf3e-76c0a789346f_blog.html">Washington Post</a>, who had the exclusive news. “I would do almost anything Tina Fey asks me to do," she said, adding, "I’m flattered that they asked me to make a cameo in the series finale. I had a lot of fun."</p><p>The final episode will air on Thursday, Jan. 31 at 8 p.m., wrapping up seven seasons of the Emmy Award-winning show.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/nancy_pelosi_to_guest_star_on_30_rock_season_finale/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/nancy_pelosi_to_guest_star_on_30_rock_season_finale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boehner holds on to speaker post</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/boehner_holds_on_to_speaker_post/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/boehner_holds_on_to_speaker_post/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 18:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allen West]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colin Powell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Cantor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite some defections, the Ohio congressman will serve another two years as speaker of the House]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Boehner squeaked by in a vote for speakership this afternoon, getting 220 votes of 426 cast, just  a handful of votes over the number needed to hang on to his seat.</p><p>There were, however, a total of 14 defections from both Boehner, and Nancy Pelosi, who got 192 votes.</p><p>House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, Va., got three votes. Reps. Louie Gohmert, Texas, and Paul Broun, Ga., both cast votes for ousted Rep. Allen West, Fla.</p><p>Tim Huelskamp, Kan., one of the four conservatives Boehner ousted from his committee spot, cast a vote for Jim Jordan, Ohio. Dave Schweikert, Ariz., another one of those conservatives, did support Boehner.</p><p>Both Michael Grimm and Peter King of New York, who had been at odds with Boehner over Hurricane Sandy relief funding, both voted for the speaker to keep his seat.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/boehner_holds_on_to_speaker_post/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/boehner_holds_on_to_speaker_post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Biggest fiscal cliff lessons</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/biggest_fiscal_cliff_lessons/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/biggest_fiscal_cliff_lessons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 20:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pelosi still speaker. Obama still open to cutting Medicare, Social Security. U.S. still run by and for the wealthy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite boasting on both sides that Congress finally made a deal on the so-called fiscal cliff, people looking for details about the deal's ultimate outcome are going to have to wait until March. (A lot of important people had vacations ruined, so they have a stake in pretending something big got accomplished.)</p><p>There's no way to know how bad or good a deal Democrats cut until the conflict they postponed is resolved, and we know what it takes to lift the debt ceiling, keep the government running and deal with the "sequester" – the combination of automatic spending cuts to defense and to social programs baked into the original debt ceiling deal back in August 2011.</p><p>As someone who believed, and still believes, that <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/the_case_against_cooperation/">it was best for the country if Democrats stood up to Republican hostage takers and went over the cliff</a>, I have to admit President Obama and his chief negotiator Vice President Joe Biden got some good things with this deal. Unemployment benefits were extended for 2 million Americans and so were tax credits that help the working and middle class. The deal also kept student-loan interest rates low. Lots of Democrats are also celebrating the fact that Republicans voted for their first tax-rate increase in 20 years. But since the White House got far less in revenue than it originally asked for, we'll see how great a concession that turned out to be, since the deal kept tax rates low for millions of wealthy Americans, and ceded crucial hikes on estates and investment income for the super-rich.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/biggest_fiscal_cliff_lessons/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/biggest_fiscal_cliff_lessons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If cut, fiscal deal will pale against expectations</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/if_cut_fiscal_deal_will_pale_against_expectations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/if_cut_fiscal_deal_will_pale_against_expectations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 14:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13157706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The agreement would see more brinkmanship in coming weeks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) -- Whether negotiated in a rush before the new year or left for early January, the fiscal deal President Barack Obama and Congress cobble together will be far smaller than what they initially envisioned as an alternative to purposefully distasteful tax increases and spending cuts.</p><p>Instead, their deal, if a deal they indeed cut, will put off some big decisions about tax and entitlement changes and leave other deadlines in place that will likely lead to similar moments of brinkmanship, some in just a matter of weeks.</p><p>Republican and Democratic negotiators in the Senate were hoping for a deal as early as Sunday on what threshold to set for increased tax rates, whether to keep current inheritance tax rates and exemptions and how to pay for jobless benefits and avoid cuts in Medicare payments to doctors.</p><p>An agreement would halt automatic across-the-board tax increases for virtually every American and perhaps temporarily put off some steep spending cuts in defense and domestic programs.</p><p>Gone, however, is the talk of a grand deal that would tackle broad spending and revenue demands and set the nation on a course to lower deficits. Obama and Republican House Speaker John Boehner were once a couple hundred billion dollars apart of a deal that would have reduced the deficit by more than $2 trillion over ten years.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/if_cut_fiscal_deal_will_pale_against_expectations/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/if_cut_fiscal_deal_will_pale_against_expectations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Congressional leaders quietly leave White House</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/congressional_lemmings_quietly_leave_white_house/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/congressional_lemmings_quietly_leave_white_house/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 21:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13156912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pelosi called fiscal cliff meeting "constructive" but no sense was given about progress in negotiations]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After meeting for little more than an hour, Congressional leaders left the White House, mostly offering no comment to the press. John Boehner and Mitch McConnell were seen leaving but offered no comment, while according to reports, Nancy Pelosi gave a brief statement, noting "I think it moved us forward."</p><p>While Pelosi described the meeting as "candid and constructive," little sense was given about concrete progress on the unlikely task of reaching a palatable deal.</p><p>According to <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-12-28/obama-said-to-plan-offer-of-scaled-back-budget-package-today-1-.html">Bloomberg News</a>, President Obama "is seeking an up-or-down vote on his proposal to extend tax cuts for annual income up to $250,000, absent a counteroffer from congressional leaders" -- which basically means that if no counteroffer is put forward that is mutually agreeable, the president will seek a vote on his proposal that everyone must take part in and that cannot be procedurally evaded -- which doesn't sound wildly desperate at all.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/congressional_lemmings_quietly_leave_white_house/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/congressional_lemmings_quietly_leave_white_house/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newtown residents fought against gun control</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/newtown_residents_fought_against_gun_control/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/newtown_residents_fought_against_gun_control/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 17:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown school shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Assault weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Lanza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D-Calif.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13147536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Law enforcement had tried to tighten rules following gunfire complaints, but assault weapon fans pushed back]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newtown, Conn.'s gun-owning residents had forcefully resisted attempts by local law enforcement in recent years to put tighter gun controls in place, the New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/17/nyregion/in-newtown-conn-a-stiff-resistance-to-gun-restrictions.html?pagewanted=all&amp;_r=1&amp;">reports.</a> The Times noted how the the legislative battle in the quiet New England town "shows how even the slightest attempts to impose restrictions on guns can run into withering resistance, made all the more pointed by the escalation in firepower."</p><p>Newtown police logged more than 50 gunfire complaints this year through July, double the number for all of 2011, the Times reported, noting that in recent years that the typical presence of gunfire from hunting had been augmented with the noise of automatic weapons and explosives near residential areas. "Near a trailer park. By a boat launch. Next to well-appointed houses. At 2:20 p.m. on one Wednesday last spring, multiple shots were reported in a wooded area on Cold Spring Road near South Main Street, right across the road from an elementary school," reported the Times.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/newtown_residents_fought_against_gun_control/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/newtown_residents_fought_against_gun_control/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sunday show round up</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/18/sunday_show_round_up_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/18/sunday_show_round_up_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 18:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R-Ga.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saxby Chambliss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dianne Feinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunday show roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunday shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Petraeus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Rogers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13102235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff debate, more Benghazi politicking and questions over when Obama learned of Petraeus affair]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Congress investigates what the Obama administration knew, and when, about the Benghazi consulate attacks, the topic once again took up considerable Sunday show focus.</p><p><strong>Benghazi:</strong></p><p>Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.), the top Republican in the Senate Intelligence Committee, told "Fox News Sunday" that he expects Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Susan Rice, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, will testify before the Senate about the Benghazi attacks. "At some point [Rice] needs to come in and say what the president or the White House directed her to say," Chambliss said.</p><p><span>On NBC's "Meet the Press," host David Gregory also pushed chair of the Senate's Select Committee on Intelligence, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and chair of the House Intelligence Committee, Rep. Mike Rogers (R-MI), </span>on whether the White House and Rice had misled the public in saying early on that the attacks were spontaneous protests, while intelligence pointed to a terrorist plot.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/18/sunday_show_round_up_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/18/sunday_show_round_up_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pelosi: Fiscal cliff deal must include tax hikes for rich</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/18/pelosi_fiscal_cliff_deal_must_include_tax_hikes_for_rich/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/18/pelosi_fiscal_cliff_deal_must_include_tax_hikes_for_rich/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[This Week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush-era tax cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunday morning shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13102184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Democratic House leader told ABC that she believes an agreement can be reached by mid-December]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nancy Pelosi, who this week announced she would stay on as Democratic House leader, told ABC's "This Week" that a fiscal cliff deal will have to include tax hikes for the rich.</p><p>“Just to close loopholes is far too little money,” Pelosi said in the interview. “If it’s going to bring in revenue, the president has been very clear that the higher income people have to pay their fair share.”</p><p><script type='text/javascript' src='http://pshared.5min.com/Scripts/PlayerSeed.js?sid=1236&amp;width=400&amp;height=255&amp;shuffle=0&amp;playList=517542874'></script></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/18/pelosi_fiscal_cliff_deal_must_include_tax_hikes_for_rich/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/18/pelosi_fiscal_cliff_deal_must_include_tax_hikes_for_rich/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>