<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > National Defense Authorization Act</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/national_defense_authorization_act/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 01:55:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Creeping authoritarianism on Capitol Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/20/creeping_authoritarianism_on_capitol_hill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/20/creeping_authoritarianism_on_capitol_hill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Gibson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defense Authorization Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[on]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12200951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What we can learn from one congressman's convoluted defense of the NDAA]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the day Occupy Congress came to Washington, I tagged along with seven Bard College students who went to talk to their representative, first-term Republican Chris Gibson from the 20th Congressional District of New York.  Listening to Gibson defend his vote for the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which President Obama signed on New Year's Eve and which allows for the indefinite detention of American citizens, I had a rare glimpse into the contemporary authoritarian mind-set in all its banality. It illustrated how the slow erosion of civil liberties manifests itself in the halls of power in Washington.</p><p>Gibson is a retired Army colonel, and it shows. From the Airborne division name plate on his desk, to the photographs of camouflaged soldiers that adorn his walls, to the “Beat Navy” button on his desk, his military background is on display. He spoke about serving in the military to defend American’s rights – rights that he claims to take very seriously. To his credit, Gibson joined 26 other House Republicans in voting <a href="http://blog.timesunion.com/capitol/archives/56454/patriot-act-vote-surprises-republicans-with-27-voting-against-extension-including-chris-gibson/">against the extension of the Patriot Act</a> in February 2011. But his written record, and his NDAA vote, indicate he is a politician more concerned with waging war than preserving liberty.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/20/creeping_authoritarianism_on_capitol_hill/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/20/creeping_authoritarianism_on_capitol_hill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Guantanamo forever?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/28/is_guatanamo_forever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/28/is_guatanamo_forever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Defense Authorization Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10268764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Senate contemplates a bipartisan bill to make permanent the failed system of indefinite detention]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A decade ago, after the Sept. 11attacks, President Bush authorized the detention without charge of alleged terrorist suspects. It had been decades since the United States had detained people without charge or trial on national security grounds. The last time was during World War II when thousands of Japanese-Americans were unjustly detained in internment camps. The U.S. has since acknowledged this mistake, paying reparations to those wrongly detained.</p><p>The Bush system of indefinite detention established at Guantanamo and elsewhere attempted to stand outside and circumvent the rule of law. This system has failed to prosecute more than a handful of terrorist suspects, while wrongfully detaining hundreds more. Yet Congress is now poised to make this system a permanent feature of U.S. law.</p><p>The National Defense Authorization Act, scheduled to be voted on by the Senate this week, contains several provisions that, if passed, would have the military police the streets, expand Guantanamo and indefinite detention elsewhere, and force certain terrorism suspects into military custody instead of charging them with crimes in civilian courts.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/28/is_guatanamo_forever/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/28/is_guatanamo_forever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
