Native Americans

A kinder, gentler cowboy

Ric Lynden Hardman revives the cowboy genre with "Sunshine Rider: The First Vegetarian Western" -- a picaresque, cocky, playful coming-of-age novel.

  • more
    • All Share Services

When you get out those scribbled-over copies of your childhood favorites to read to your kids, glance through them first. You may be shocked. Pippi Longstocking, Mary Poppins, Doctor Doolittle, Tintin, Babar and Nancy Drew all have characters, scenes, pictures or entire plot lines that many contemporary judges find appalling — racist, imperialist, far from green. Even Mark Twain, who seemed to have made it securely into the canon, has been under attack for using the N word. Some current editions of old children’s books omit chapters, change names or quietly amend an illustration; some publishers let the old text stand but tuck an apology into the preface. These new attitudes have sparked a lot of debate: Are the books truly racist? Which ones? What’s the best thing to do about it — buy expurgated editions, hand over the unabridged versions with plenty of discussion, ban them altogether? (I’ll save my opinions on such matters for a future column.)

These attitudes have also had a profound effect on new books. Now that savage redskins and cannibals dancing around the pot are no longer acceptable fare, thank God, children’s literature has had to find alternative sources of rip-roaring adventure. The genre most affected by the new rules may be the western. Genocide and environmental rape cast an unflattering light on Ma, Pa, Laura and the rest of the “Little House” crew. Short of putting black hats on all the cowboys and turning all European settlers into villains — an idea that admittedly has much to be said for it — can the genre be salvaged?

Ric Lynden Hardman thinks so. To that end, he’s written “Sunshine Rider: The First Vegetarian Western,” a picaresque, cocky, literate, playful coming-of-age novel for 12-year-olds and grownups with taste. Don’t be put off by the crunchy-granola-sounding title. “Sunshine Rider” substitutes conscience and humor for the earnestness and sentiment that PC young adult books often dish up. This western has all the elements of the traditional kind: an enterprising young hero still wet behind the ears; a dark, drawling, magnetic man of mystery; a lady love or two; a selection of Indians; snake oil; gunfights; and plenty of cactus and cattle. It also has a number of elements you won’t find in your average Zane Grey.

Each chapter, for one thing, begins with a recipe, setting the tone for the action to follow. Here’s the first one, for porterhouse steaks: “Raise a tripod of three stout poles about 12 feet off the ground with a rope and pulley at the crown. Catch a well-fleshed steer, about eight-hundred-pound weight. Bind its rear legs, trip it off its feet and stun by a blow to the head with a four-pound sledge, being careful not to crush the skull. Hoist the steer to the tripod and place a washtub under the head. Open the jugular vein and let the heart pump the blood until the steer is drained. Skin the steer and open the abdominal cavity, being careful not to spill the guts. Concentrate fecal matter in the lower colon and tie this off in two places … With a sharp butcher knife and cleaver remove the short loin … Cut loin into porterhouse steaks … Fry … to taste … Feeds 15 men.” Here’s one near the end of the book, for pigweed greens: “Gather new pigweed leaves and rinse. Add tumbleweed sprouts if available. Steam greens in closed pan until tender. Drain and fry in butter. Add salt and vinegar and serve. A woeful dish.” In between — during the chapter headed “Scrambled Brains and Eggs,” to be precise — the narrator, Wylie Jackson, succumbs to his growing love for a heifer catalo and becomes a vegetarian.

It’s 1881. Wylie, an orphan living with his schoolteacher aunt in Odessa, Texas, has always daydreamed about joining the annual cattle drive to Wichita, but he doesn’t think Aunt Clara will ever let him go. So he’s astonished but eager when she tells him that a friend has arranged for him to join the drive as an assistant cook. His schoolmate Alice asks him to deliver Roselle, her pet catalo — half cow, half buffalo — to her cousin in the Oklahoma Territory. Reluctantly, he agrees. Roselle can come when called, sit on command, lie down and roll over, but only when Alice asks. With everyone else, she’s stubborn as that other famous hybrid ruminant (the mule). To make Roselle comfortable with Wylie, Alice bullies him into taking something of hers: “I raised my hand and Alice put the article in it. It was warm. It was soft. It was embroidered. It was Alice Beck’s drawers.”

“When I’m gone,” Alice explains, “she’ll think you’re me.”

The first few weeks of the drive are a dream come true for Wylie, who gains the grudging respect of the cowboys by toughing out their practical jokes and cooking unusually edible food. He even develops a curious rapport with Mr. John Boardman, the drive’s strong, silent leader. Then comes Wylie’s first crisis of conscience, when his boss sends him to kill the calves that have been born along the trail and collect their brains for breakfast — newborn calves can’t keep up with the herd and their mothers won’t leave them behind. Wylie loses his taste for meat. He finds that he’s become too fond of Roselle to risk seeing her sent to the slaughter yards, so with the help of Alice’s drawers and Mr. Boardman’s horse, he takes her and runs.

Though some of the book’s recipes sound like People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals propaganda, Wylie isn’t squeamish. He continues to cook meat even after he stops eating it, and he develops a fascination for anatomy, turning his butchery chores into experiments in dissection. Drawn to the medical arts, he proclaims himself a doctor. He uses his new identity to fast-talk himself out of more than one hot spot as he tries to lead his bovine friend to safety. But as in any good coming-of-age road story, his larger task is to become the man he pretends to be. Along the way, a series of mothers and fathers stand in for the parents he never knew. Hardman manages his growth so skillfully that his true identity, which Wylie learns at the end of the novel, seems both surprising and inevitable.

Hardman plays with the genre, teasing his readers for their expectations. In a double reversal of tradition, for example, he introduces an Indian missionary — a Sikh from the Punjab who’s bent on converting the meat-eating heathen nations to vegetarianism. Majul Majul is also a con artist, a peddler of dangerous patent medical devices. Hardman’s main Native American character, Tim-oo-leh, is a much more serious healer, the president of the intertribal Medicine Men’s Society. Both Indian doctors make important contributions to Wylie’s medical education. Hardman paints all of his characters, including the Indians and Wylie himself, with evenhanded exaggeration that should absolve him of any charges of stereotyping. Hardman’s genius, like that of his literary mentor Mark Twain, is to weave satire and sincerity into a hilarious, moving book that’s not afraid to take a stand. Even the apparently sappy title is really a bit of self-mockery: A sunshine rider is a man who likes to admire his own shadow. And quite a shadow it is.

Polly Shulman edits news articles for the journal Science.

Remembering Michael Dorris

Friends and colleagues celebrate the writer's life -- and take issue, sometimes angrily, with those who have raised dark questions about it.

  • more
    • All Share Services

“Leave-taking, I’ve decided, is quite beside the point. Memory, though, is not.” These were the words of historian Simon Schama, speaking at a memorial service Tuesday evening at New York’s Donnell Library for writer Michael Dorris, who killed himself in late April. The service, which followed one held earlier this month at Dartmouth, where Dorris was an adjunct professor of Native American studies, was attended by close to 100 of Dorris’ friends, family members and colleagues, and featured a series of testimonials from a range of figures in the publishing and media world.

With his simultaneous acknowledgment of the impossibility of reconciling oneself to an untimely death and his insistence that remembering is a necessary and valuable project, Schama aptly described the mood of the service as a whole. Dorris’ friends adopted a tone that might be termed celebratorily mournful, capturing the full weight of Dorris’ absence by talking about the pleasure they had taken in his presence.

Even as they remembered their friend, the speakers challenged — in some cases subtly and in others more explicitly — the wave of bad press and scandal that followed Dorris’ suicide. It’s almost certainly true that one memorial service is very much like another. Grief may be always original, but the words we use to express it are not. But this service seemed different, as much a reaffirmation of Dorris and of his friends’ faith in him as it was a memorial.

The Michael Dorris who emerged from his friends’ recollections was, unsurprisingly, a complicated figure. A committed activist and a serious novelist whose early work, in particular, was well-received critically, Dorris was also a man obsessed with the business of buying and selling books. Bill Shinker, his publisher at HarperCollins, described Dorris as “a dream author” who could, nevertheless, be “maddening as hell to work with.” For Shinker, Dorris was at once a “real operator,” a man who served as his own agent, publicist and marketing director, and someone who retained “a naive, even childlike quality about him” long after he had become famous.

More tellingly, the speakers at the service stressed Dorris’ thirst for human contact, his appetite for conversation and exchange. They described a man who needed people, perhaps, too much. Kate Wimmer, a producer at ABC’s “20/20″ who met Dorris while producing a segment on fetal alcohol syndrome (the subject of Dorris’ book “The Broken Cord”), said of him, “He needed talk the way others of us need food or need air.” What Wimmer left unspoken was the question, “What happens to someone who needs talk when the person he most wants to talk to leaves him?” Schama answered that question: “I think in the end he could not imagine a life without the woman he loved best of all.” Dorris’ wife, Louise Erdrich, left him almost a year before the suicide and had custody of their children.

Schama, the evening’s most eloquent and moving speaker, spoke most explicitly to the responsibility he felt for Dorris’ decision. “I curse my sluggish obtuseness, my cowardly laziness,” he said. While Schama described Dorris as a man of “incredible douceur,” he did not shy from the torment that must have racked Dorris at the end of his life. In those last months, Schama said simply, Dorris “was certainly in deep water.”

Erdrich did not attend the service, but a letter from her was read. In it she wrote of her attempts to figure out how to speak to “our children” about their father’s death, and suggested that each time the story was told it came out differently. “His death,” she wrote, “leaves us gasping.”

Hovering over the service, of course, was the specter of the barrage of negative stories that filled the pages of the national press in the weeks after Dorris’ suicide, stories that included allegations of child abuse, revelations about Erdrich’s decision to end their marriage and rumors about other scandals in Dorris’ past. ( Salon ran a story about these charges and rumors.) If Dorris’ suicide was, as some have suggested, an attempt to spare his family the ordeal of public examination, it obviously failed. But those who spoke on Tuesday were resolute in their insistence that recent press accounts offered only a reductionist and distorted picture of their friend’s life. Schama was visibly upset at the idea that Dorris, whom he described as “trying to find the good or at least the saving complexity” in things others had long since abandoned, should have “his innocence called into question.” Erdrich, meanwhile, suggested simply that Dorris’ existence added up to “much more than the notoriety and confusion of the last few months.”

The strongest attack on the media came from Bob Edwards, a reporter for National Public Radio who befriended Dorris after meeting him on an early book tour (curiously enough, Edwards and Dorris had also gone to the same high school). “In the last month, there have been more positive words printed about Timothy McVeigh than about Michael Dorris,” Edwards said. He labeled the recent stories “fiction,” while blasting “the media buzzards and the lawyer buzzards” who were circling over Dorris’ grave. As a counter to “the man the revisionists have invented,” he offered a vivid picture of a man invested in the minutiae of the everyday, a man dedicated to his family, a man who “loved everything about being a writer.”

One might say that Dorris’ suicide stands as mute testimony to the fact that the picture was more complicated than that. But one suspects that enough has been written about Dorris’ shadow side. On this day, for his friends, it was a time for remembering something different.

Continue Reading Close

James Surowiecki is a regular contributor to Salon.

Page 5 of 5 in Native Americans