<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Neuroscience</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/neuroscience/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Hold on tight</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/12/hold_on_tight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/12/hold_on_tight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12919365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Science shows that closeness with others doesn't just help us cope with pain -- it makes us live longer]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came home from work late one evening, hungry and frustrated, and popped into my mother’s house, which was next door to mine. She was eating a frozen dinner and sipping from a mug of hot water. CNN blared on the TV in the background. She asked how my day had been. I said, “Oh, it was good.” She looked up from her black plastic food tray and, after a moment, said, “No, it wasn’t. What happened? Have some pot roast.” My mother was eighty-eight, hard of hearing, and half blind in her right eye—which was her good eye. But when it came to perceiving her son’s emotions, my mother’s X-ray vision was unimpaired.</p><p>As she read my mood with such fluency, I thought about the man who had been my coworker and partner in frustration that day—the physicist Stephen Hawking, who could hardly move a muscle, thanks to a forty-five-year struggle with motor neuron disease. By this stage in the progression of his illness, he could communicate only by painstakingly twitching the cheek muscle under his right eye. That twitch was detected by a sensor on his glasses and communicated to a computer in his wheelchair. In this manner, with the help of some special software, he managed to select letters and words from a screen, and eventually to type out what he wanted to express. On his “good” days, it was as if he were playing a video game where the prize was the ability to communicate a thought. On his “bad” days, it was as if he were blinking in Morse code but had to look up the dot and dash sequence between each letter. On the bad days—and this had been one of them—our work was frustrating for both of us.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/12/hold_on_tight/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/12/hold_on_tight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans: Wired for homophobia</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/05/republicans_homophobic_wiring_salpart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/05/republicans_homophobic_wiring_salpart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12914912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research sheds light on why conservatives are so eager to embrace anti-gay pseudoscience]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On May 8, North Carolinians will vote on a constitutional amendment that defines a marriage between a man and a woman as the “only domestic legal union” the state will recognize -- thereby barring LGBT marriage equality. The amendment <a href="http://www.protectallncfamilies.org/the-truth" target="_blank">would also</a> ban civil unions and end domestic partner benefits like prescription drug and health care coverage for the partners and children of public employees. At its deepest level, this issue is about fairness for everyone under the law. But less mentioned is that it is also about science, and about what’s factually true.</p><p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a>Many voters who go to the polls to support Amendment One will do so believing outright falsehoods about same-sex marriages and civil unions. In particular, they hold the belief that such partnerships are damaging to the health and well-being of the children raised in them. That is, after all, one of the chief justifications for the amendment.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/05/republicans_homophobic_wiring_salpart/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/05/republicans_homophobic_wiring_salpart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>168</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republican fear factor</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/03/republican_fear_factor_salpart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/03/republican_fear_factor_salpart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12913693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservatives' paranoid alternate-reality can be explained by their brain chemistry -- and their media choices]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consider for a moment just how terrifying it must be to live life as a true believer on the right. Reality is scary enough, but the alternative reality inhabited by people who watch Glenn Beck, listen to Rush Limbaugh, or think Michele Bachmann isn't a joke must be nothing less than horrifying.</p><p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a>Research suggests that conservatives are, on average, more susceptible to fear than those who identify themselves as liberals. Looking at MRIs of a large sample of young adults last year, researchers at University College London discovered that “greater conservatism was associated with increased volume of the right amygdala” (<a href="http://www.cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822(11)00289-2" target="_blank">$$</a>). The amygdala is an ancient brain structure that's activated during states of fear and anxiety. (The researchers also found that “greater liberalism was associated with increased gray matter volume in the anterior cingulate cortex” – a region in the brain that is believed to help people manage complexity.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/03/republican_fear_factor_salpart/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/03/republican_fear_factor_salpart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>85</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Near death, rehashed</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/01/near_death_rehashed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/01/near_death_rehashed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 20:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12913037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Beauregard's reaction to out-of-body science criticisms proves my original point]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="lead">The story so far: Mario Beauregard published a very silly article in Salon, claiming that <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/21/near_death_explained/">Near-Death Experiences (NDEs) were proof of life after death</a>, a claim that he attempted to support with a couple of feeble anecdotes. I replied, pointing out that <a href="http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2012/04/24/the-nde-delusion/">NDEs are delusions, and his anecdotal evidence was not evidence at all</a>. Now Salon has given Beauregard another shot at it, and he has replied with a <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/29/near_death_revisited/">“rebuttal” to my refutation</a>. You will not be surprised to learn that he has no evidence to add, and his response is simply a predictable rehashing of the same flawed reasoning he has exercised throughout.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/01/near_death_rehashed/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/01/near_death_rehashed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>342</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your brain on white people</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/29/your_brain_on_white_people/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/29/your_brain_on_white_people/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Girls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12909801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neuroscience shows the media's overwhelming whiteness really is changing our minds. But we can change them back]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It simply isn’t true that there are no folks of color in the new HBO series "Girls," in which young, attractive white women try to find their way in the post-9/11 Big Apple. For example, in the last minute of the very first episode, a homeless black guy talks to our quirky, spunky heroine, Hannah.  “Why don’t you smile?” he says to her. “Does your heart hurt? Oh, girl, when I look at you, I just want to say Hellloooo, New York!”</p><p>Hello, New York, indeed. This isn’t the first time TV pushed millions of immigrants and people of color to the margins of one of the most diverse cities in the world. Hello, Woody Allen! Hello, "Seinfeld"! Hello, "Friends" and "Sex and the City"! If "Girls" can’t make it there, it can’t make it anywhere. Of course, the rest of TV has been overwhelmingly white, too. Ever since "Father Knows Best" and "Wagon Train," the medium has long presented a whitewashed version of the way we live.</p><p>That might be why some "Girls" writers take exception to their show being singled out for criticism. Here’s what writer Leslie Arfin <a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/entertainment/2012/04/girls-writer-responds-critique-girls-horrible-joke/51314/">tweeted</a> in response to criticisms: "What really bothered me most about Precious was that there was no representation of ME." ("Precious," the 2009 film about a mentally and sexually abused teenager, featured a predominantly black cast.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/29/your_brain_on_white_people/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/29/your_brain_on_white_people/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Near-death, revisited</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/29/near_death_revisited/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/29/near_death_revisited/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12911826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A response to PZ Myers' criticisms about my recent Salon story on the science of out-of-body experiences]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, I would like to thank Salon for giving me the opportunity to respond to P.Z. Myers's <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/26/near_death_distorted/">article</a>. In his article, Dr. Myers argues that near-death experience (NDE) stories are poorly documented. While this may true in some cases, it is not in many others (take, for instance, the cases investigated by prominent NDE researchers such as Bruce Greyson, Pim van Lommel, Sam Parnia, and Peter Fenwick).</p><p>With regard to mind-brain relationship, the most interesting NDE cases are those occurring during cardiac arrest. When there is a cardiac arrest, brain activity ceases within a few seconds. In that state, the electroencephalogram (or EEG—electroencephalography is a technique for recording the electrical activity of the brain) becomes rapidly flat. According to contemporary neuroscience, consciousness and other higher mental functions are not possible in such a state. Yet, more than 100 cases of NDEs occurring during cardiac arrest have been reported in previous studies. Importantly, some of these cases contain temporal markers, that is, verifiable reports of events occurring during the period of cardiac arrest (I am presenting a number of such cases in "Brain Wars").</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/29/near_death_revisited/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/29/near_death_revisited/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>271</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Near-death, distorted</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/26/near_death_distorted/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/26/near_death_distorted/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 17:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12910182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Taking aim at a recent Salon story about the science of out-of-body experiences]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Salon has had a redesign, which is fine; it seems to do this periodically just to confuse us. I’ll adjust to that, but what I don’t like is that the first thing I saw highlighted was an article so full of woo that for a moment I thought I’d stumbled onto the Huffington Post. We are now supposed to believe that <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/21/near_death_explained/" rel="nofollow">science has explained near-death experiences (NDEs), and the answer is proof of life after death</a>. It’s all nonsense; some editor somewhere needs to learn some critical thinking, because this article is filed under “neuroscience” when it ought to be in a category called “bullshit.”</p><p>The first clue that this is going to be bad is the author, Mario Beauregard. Beauregard was coauthor with Denyse O’Leary of one of the worst, that is, most incompetently written and idiotically conceived, books I’ve ever read, "<a href="http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2007/10/the_spiritual_brain.php">The Spiritual Brain</a>." It’s not just that he thought it sensible to team up with a well-known intelligent-design crank, but that the content is unreadable and the “science” is gobbledy-gook — Beauregard is a well-established kook, and here he is, writing for Salon.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/26/near_death_distorted/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/26/near_death_distorted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>405</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Near death, explained</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/21/near_death_explained/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/21/near_death_explained/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12893481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New science is shedding light on what really happens during out-of-body experiences -- with shocking results.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1991, Atlanta-based singer and songwriter Pam Reynolds felt extremely dizzy, lost her ability to speak, and had difficulty moving her body. A CAT scan showed that she had a giant artery aneurysm—a grossly swollen blood vessel in the wall of her basilar artery, close to the brain stem. If it burst, which could happen at any moment, it would kill her. But the standard surgery to drain and repair it might kill her too.</p><p>With no other options, Pam turned to a last, desperate measure offered by neurosurgeon Robert Spetzler at the Barrow Neurological Institute in Phoenix, Arizona. Dr. Spetzler was a specialist and pioneer in hypothermic cardiac arrest—a daring surgical procedure nicknamed “Operation Standstill.” Spetzler would bring Pam’s body down to a temperature so low that she was essentially dead. Her brain would not function, but it would be able to survive longer without oxygen at this temperature. The low temperature would also soften the swollen blood vessels, allowing them to be operated on with less risk of bursting. When the procedure was complete, the surgical team would bring her back to a normal temperature before irreversible damage set in.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/21/near_death_explained/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/21/near_death_explained/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>430</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drug-personality misconceptions</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/19/debunking_drug_personality_misconceptions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/19/debunking_drug_personality_misconceptions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Fix]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12882401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alcoholic writers? Coke-head stockbrokers? The links between personality type and addiction are largely overblown]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here’s Ernest Hemingway, dead drunk on a stool in Cuba with his face on his hand and his hand on an ever-present mojito. He's the tormented writer, hard at work at the daily scrubbing of his sins. Like the Hard-Drinking Writer, we've come to expect certain personality types to have certain habits: The Morose Musician with Keith Richards' appetite for heroin; the Insecure Starlet with Marilyn's taste for pills; the Monomaniacal Money Manager with a nose for cocaine. They are generalizations that have been imprinted by generations of popular culture. But the types don't necessarily line up.</p><p><a href="http://www.thefix.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://www.thefix.com/sites/all/themes/thefix/images/logo.png" alt="the fix" width="150" align="left" /></a>The logic of associating personalities with specific drugs <em>seems</em> natural. A German-British psychologist named Hans Eysenck spent the mid-20th century turning the eye of the scientific community from Freud’s behavior-based theories to individualized psychology—pioneering the science of personality. He considered this pursuit of matching personalities with drugs a pet project.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/19/debunking_drug_personality_misconceptions/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/19/debunking_drug_personality_misconceptions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What doesn&#8217;t kill you</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/15/what_doesnt_kill_you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/15/what_doesnt_kill_you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12860571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When we escape death, we feel lucky and purposeful. Now science is explaining why]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One morning in August 1944, a German Doodlebug exploded in London, disturbing a butterfly and causing it to flap its wings. No one seemed to notice the tiny breeze.</p><p>A year later, on the morning of August 9, 1945, the wings of Bockscar lifted it into the air. The B-29, loaded with a five-ton atomic bomb named “Fat Man,” took off from Tinian, an island 1,500 miles southeast of Japan. The United States had dropped “Little Boy” over Hiroshima on August 6, immediately killing tens of thousands of people, but Japan had not yet surrendered World War II. Around 9:30 a.m., the weather scout plane Up an’ Atom reported a few clouds but decent conditions over the next target. Clear for bombing.</p><p>Oh, but what’s that? The year-old turbulence of a butterfly halfway around the world? By the time Bockscar passed over its target at 10:44 a.m., the city was covered in haze. According to the pilot’s flight log, “Two additional runs were made, hoping that the target might be picked up after closer observation. However, at no time was the aiming point seen.” So the crew left the city of Kokura and made their way over to their second choice, Nagasaki.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/15/what_doesnt_kill_you/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/15/what_doesnt_kill_you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gorillas made me do it</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/14/gorillas_made_me_do_it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/14/gorillas_made_me_do_it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12864941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From dating to elevator riding, our social interactions are a lot like primate game play. An expert explains]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You walk into an elevator and push the button for your desired floor. The button lights up. The elevator stops at the next floor and another person enters. He or she pushes the same button that’s already lit up.</p><p>According to Dario Maestripieri’s new book, <a href="http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/games-primates-play-dario-maestripieri/1103620351?ean=9780465020782">"Games Primates Play,"</a> that elevator ride represents a game of dominance -- similar to those exhibited by other primates. The University of Chicago professor argues that our social relationships have analogs in nature, especially within groups of primates. While we may not go up and grab our supervisor’s genitals as a sign of respect, we engage in similar acts that help us figure out where we fit in groups.</p><p>By exploring our social lives through the lens of an evolutionary biologist, Maestripieri breaks down the most routine of social interactions into deeply embedded behaviors from our genetic forebears. Just like humans, other primates grapple with questions of dominance, reciprocation, nepotism and fidelity. He demonstrates how his own life, the lives of celebrities, and corporate success strategies all derive from a single, primal need to find our place in a group.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/14/gorillas_made_me_do_it/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/14/gorillas_made_me_do_it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The evolution of death</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/18/the_evolution_of_death/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/18/the_evolution_of_death/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12682811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scientists remain surprisingly conflicted about what it means to die -- and it has big implications for us all]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael DeVita of the University of Pittsburgh recalls making the rounds at a student teaching hospital with his interns in tow when he remembered that he had a patient upstairs who was near death. He sent a few of the young doctors “to check on Mr. Smith” in Room 301 and to report back on whether he was dead yet. DeVita continued rounds with the remainder of the interns, but after some time had passed he wondered what happened to his emissaries of death. Trotting up to Mr. Smith’s room, he found them all paging through “The Washington Manual,” the traditional handbook given to interns. But there is nothing in the manual that tells new doctors how to determine which patients are alive and which are dead.</p><p>Most of us would agree that King Tut and the other mummified ancient Egyptians are dead, and that you and I are alive. Somewhere in between these two states lies the moment of death. But where is that? The old standby — and not such a bad standard — is the stopping of the heart. But the stopping of a heart is anything but irreversible. We’ve seen hearts start up again on their own inside the body, outside the body, even in someone else’s body. Christian Barnard was the first to show us that a heart could stop in one body and be fired up in another. Due to the mountain of evidence to the contrary, it is comical to consider that "brain death" marks the moment of legal death in all fifty states.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/18/the_evolution_of_death/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/18/the_evolution_of_death/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>96</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The scientific argument for being emotional</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/25/the_scientific_argument_for_being_emotional/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/25/the_scientific_argument_for_being_emotional/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12412231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research shows that our feelings are more important to our health than we ever thought. An expert explains]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the end of his second year of Harvard graduate school, neuroscientist and bestselling author Richard Davidson did something his colleagues suspected would mark the end of his academic career: He skipped town and went to India and Sri Lanka for three months to “study meditation.” In the '70s, just as today, people tended to lump meditation into the new-age category, along with things like astrology, crystals, tantra and herbal “remedies.” But contrary to what his skeptics presumed, not only did Davidson return to resume his studies at Harvard, his trip also marked the beginning of Davidson’s most spectacular body of work: neuroscientific research indicating that meditation (and other strictly mental activity) changes the neuroplasticity of the brain.</p><p>Thirty years later, Davidson is still researching and writing about the intersection of neuroscience and emotion -- he currently teaches psychology and psychiatry at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. In his new book, written with Sharon Begley, <a href="http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/emotional-life-of-your-brain-richard-j-davidson/1102246573">“The Emotional Life of Your Brain: How Its Unique Patterns Affect the Way You Think, Feel, and Live, and How You Can Change Them,”</a> Davidson lays out a fascinating theory that parses out emotional style into six dimensions, giving readers a better understanding of where they stand on this emotional plane and how emotional styles affect the qualities of their everyday lives.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/25/the_scientific_argument_for_being_emotional/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/25/the_scientific_argument_for_being_emotional/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The neuroscience of happiness</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/28/the_neuroscience_of_happiness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/28/the_neuroscience_of_happiness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12236911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New discoveries are shedding light on the activities that make us happy. An expert explains]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They say money can’t buy happiness. But can a better understanding of your brain? As recent breakthroughs in cognitive science break new ground in the study of consciousness -- and its relationship to the physical body -- the mysteries of the mind are rapidly becoming less mysterious. But does this mean we’ll soon be able to locate a formula for good cheer?</p><p>Shimon Edelman, a cognitive expert and professor of psychology at Cornell University, offers some insight in <a href="http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/the-happiness-of-pursuit-shimon-edelman/1104516174?ean=9780465022243&amp;itm=2&amp;usri=happiness+of+pursuit">"The Happiness of Pursuit: What Neuroscience Can Teach Us About the Good Life."</a> In his new book, Edelman walks the reader through the brain’s basic computational skills – its ability to compute information, perform statistical analysis and weigh value judgments in daily life – as a way to explain our relationship with happiness. Our capacity to retain memories and develop foresight allows us to plan for the future, says Edelman, by using a mental “personal space-time machine” that jumps between past, present and future. It’s through this process of motivation, perception, thinking, followed by motor movement, that we’re able not only to survive, but to feel happy. From Bayes’ theorem of probability to Shakespeare’s "Romeo and Juliet," Edelman offers a range of references and allegories to explain why a changing, growing self, constantly shaped by new experiences, is happier than the satisfaction any end goal can give us. It turns out the rewards we get for learning and understanding the workings of the world really make it the journey, not the destination, that matters most.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/28/the_neuroscience_of_happiness/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/28/the_neuroscience_of_happiness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How stress is really hurting our kids</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/02/how_stress_is_really_hurting_our_kids/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/02/how_stress_is_really_hurting_our_kids/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10752231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New science shows that childhood trauma can cause cancer, heart disease and other problems. An expert explains]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fear is a part of everyday life, for all of us. We worry about the mortgage, about the way we look, whether we'll be fired. We worry whether we'll be able to take the kids on vacation, or how we'll afford to pay the bills. The fact is, the more stressed we are, the less healthy we are. Doctors and scientists point out parallels between our growing rates of trauma and questionable decision making, and the fact that they're leading to greater rates of obesity, diabetes, heart disease and high cholesterol. But when it comes to children, the effects of trauma can be much, much worse.</p><p><a href="http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/scared-sick-robin-karr-morse/1101006100?ean=9780465013548&amp;itm=1&amp;usri=scared+sick">"Scared Sick: The Role of Childhood Trauma in Adult Disease,"</a> the new book by Robin Karr-Morse and Meredith S. Wiley (respectively, a family therapist and a nonprofit worker with a background in family policy), explains just how profoundly babies and young children are affected by traumatic experiences. In the remarkably researched work, the two women show that early life malnutrition and abuse can affect a kid's nervous system well into adulthood. Children raised in traumatic environments are more prone to cancer, chronic pain and even diabetes. The duo's previous book, "Ghosts From the Nursery," looked at the childhood roots of violence, but this new work is no less significant in its conclusions about American culture.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/02/how_stress_is_really_hurting_our_kids/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/02/how_stress_is_really_hurting_our_kids/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are we on information overload?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/01/are_we_on_information_overload/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/01/are_we_on_information_overload/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10800301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Internet has transformed knowledge. An expert explains why it's launched the greatest period in human history]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last two decades have completely transformed the way we know. Thanks to the rise of the Internet,  information is far more accessible than ever before. It's more connected to other pieces of information and more open to debate. Organizations -- and even governmental projects like Data.gov -- are putting more previously inaccessible data on the Web than people in the pre-Internet age could possibly have imagined. But this change raises another, more ominous question: Is this deluge overwhelming our brains?</p><p>In his new book, <a href="http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/too-big-to-know-david-weinberger/1101006097?ean=9780465021420&amp;itm=1&amp;usri=too+big+to+know">"Too Big to Know,"</a> David Weinberger, a senior researcher at Harvard's Berkman Center for Internet and Society, attempts to answer that question by looking at the ways our newly interconnected society is transforming the media, science and our everyday lives. In an accessible yet profound work, he explains that in our new universe, facts have been replaced by "networked facts" that exist largely in the context of a digital network. As a result, Weinberger believes we have entered a new golden age, one in which technology has finally caught up with humans' endless curiosity, and one that has the potential to revolutionize a wide swath of occupations and research fields.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/01/are_we_on_information_overload/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/01/are_we_on_information_overload/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should we erase painful memories?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/31/should_we_erase_painful_memories/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/31/should_we_erase_painful_memories/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10658201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind" could soon become a reality -- but the concept raises some thorny questions]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the most tenacious themes of 20th-century memory research was the idea that people tormented by the memories of terrible experiences could benefit from remembering them, and from remembering them better. The assumption — broadly indebted to psychoanalysis — was that psychological records of traumatic events often failed to be fully “integrated” into conscious memories. As long as these records remained “dissociated,” the sufferer was compelled to “relive” them instead of benignly remembering them. The more fully and appropriately one remembered terrible events, the more attenuated would be their emotional power.</p><p>But in the 1990s — a time when psychoanalytic assumptions were being challenged as never before — neuroscience researchers developed a new framework for thinking about remembering, forgetting, and the mind’s record of past events. One result was a highly controversial new paradigm for treating traumatic memories. The problem with bad memories, these new researchers claimed, is not their complex and unresolved relation to one’s sense of self, but the simple fact that they are unpleasant. These researchers defined emotional memory not in terms of repressed ideas, but by certain patterns of neuron action and the chemical changes they triggered. The next step was to change these patterns.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/31/should_we_erase_painful_memories/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/31/should_we_erase_painful_memories/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why we make bad decisions</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/27/why_we_make_bad_decisions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/27/why_we_make_bad_decisions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10702121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Occupy Wall Street to online dating, our surroundings can dictate the choices we make. An expert explains]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What role do our surroundings have in the choices we make? Consider the fact that we are more likely to commit a “random” act of kindness toward a person who has already done something kind toward us. We are less likely to help someone in serious trouble when we’re in a crowd, or choose different professions based on the sound and spelling of our first names. It turns out the context in which we make our decisions has a huge impact on their outcomes.</p><p>In his new book <a href="http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/situations-matter-sam-sommers/1100480606?ean=9781594488184&amp;itm=1&amp;usri=situation+matters">"Situations Matter: Understanding How Context Transforms Your World,"</a> author Sam Sommers, an associate professor of psychology at Tufts University, looks at what context can teach us about everything from test questions to romantic partners to career choices. Sommers offers a fascinating glimpse into the way our most important judgments are framed by the world around us.</p><p>Salon spoke with Sommers over the phone about Occupy Wall Street, online dating and Penn State's Joe Paterno riot.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/27/why_we_make_bad_decisions/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/27/why_we_make_bad_decisions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The science of taste</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/26/the_science_of_taste/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/26/the_science_of_taste/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Author Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10248965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why can\'t a blindfolded person tell white wine from red? A top neuroscientist explains how the brain creates flavor]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether we're talking about America’s obesity epidemic, mocking the “foodie” movement on <a href="http://www.metacafe.com/watch/hl-60003900/the_simpsons_foodie_season_23/">"The Simpsons,"</a> the USDA’s revamped <a href="http://www.cnpp.usda.gov/myplate.htm">food pyramid</a>, or what they’re cooking up on <a href="http://www.bravotv.com/top-chef/season-9/videos/padma-will-make-someone-pay">"Top Chef,"</a> food and eating are a national obsession -- especially at this time of year.</p><p>But just as fascinating is the hard science behind our intimate relationship with food. Gordon M. Shepherd, professor of neurobiology at the Yale School of Medicine, has spent a lifetime researching the brain mechanisms involved in olfaction (our sense of smell) and its impact on flavor perception in the brain. His new book is “Neurogastronomy: How the Brain Creates Flavor and Why It Matters,” out this month from Columbia University Press. Shepherd’s work is anchored in a burgeoning field within neuroscience -- figuring out the mysteries behind our olfactory system, the ways in which smells are represented and processed in the brain.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/26/the_science_of_taste/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/26/the_science_of_taste/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why we forget</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/20/why_we_forget/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/20/why_we_forget/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10233596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Science shows our memory can easily be distorted and erased -- but our forgetfulness also helps us survive]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our memories are wrong at least as often as they are right. At best, they are incomplete, though we might swear other wise. This affects countless aspects of our lives, and in many cases our memories — true or false — affect others’ lives.</p><p>Perhaps the most exciting neuroscience discovery of the last several decades is that our brains are not static hunks of tissue but flexible and adaptive organs that change throughout our lives. The term used to describe this new understanding is brain plasticity. The flexibility of your brain is essential to memory and indispensable to learning. Specifically, the “plastic” parts of our brain are synapses — the connection points that allow neurons to transmit signals between each other. Hyper-magnification of synapses in an adult human brain shows various sizes and shapes, some shaped like mushrooms, others shaped more like small hills and others shaped like broad-based mountains. The incredible part is that in your brain and mine, synapses are morphing from one shape to the next depending on the need — how fluid the connection between neurons needs to be, for example — and this continues happening throughout our lives.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/20/why_we_forget/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/20/why_we_forget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

