<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Newt Gingrich</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/newt_gingrich/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 19:41:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Gingrich: GOP beginning to &#8220;deal with reality&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/gingrich_gop_beginning_to_accept_reality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/gingrich_gop_beginning_to_accept_reality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 15:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13154812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Boehner may not agree, but on a host of issues, Newt and others say the GOP must -- and will -- change]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For years, Republicans have adhered fiercely to their bedrock conservative principles, resisting Democratic calls for tax hikes, comprehensive immigration reform and gun control. Now, seven weeks after an electoral drubbing, some party leaders and rank-and-file alike are signaling a willingness to bend on all three issues.</p><p>What long has been a nonstarter for Republicans -- raising tax rates on wealthy Americans -- is now backed by GOP House Speaker John Boehner in his negotiations with President Barack Obama to avert a potential fiscal crisis. Party luminaries, including Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, have started calling for a wholesale shift in the GOP's approach to immigration after Hispanic voters shunned Republican candidates. And some Republicans who previously championed gun rights now are opening the door to restrictions following a schoolhouse shooting spree earlier this month.</p><p>"Put guns on the table. Also, put video games on the table. Put mental health on the table," Rep. Jack Kingston, R-Ga., said last week. Other prominent Republicans echoed him in calling for a sweeping review of how to prevent tragedies like the Newtown, Conn., massacre. Among those who were open to a re-evaluation of the nation's gun policies were Sens. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., and Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/gingrich_gop_beginning_to_accept_reality/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/gingrich_gop_beginning_to_accept_reality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>12 for &#8217;12: The year in politics</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/25/12_for_12_the_year_in_politics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/25/12_for_12_the_year_in_politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2012 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best of 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Santorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandra Fluke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Matthews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Christie]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13153873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[12 people who defined the last 12 months of American politics]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To close out 2012, I’ve looked back at each month and selected one individual who loomed large in the news and whose story tells us something significant about the year in politics. This is an admittedly imprecise exercise. Not all months are created equally. There are some months when multiple people could have been chosen; in other months, the pickings were slim. And in some cases, the names I’ve chosen offer a reminder that in political journalism, what seems vitally important one day can seem trivial the next.  Anyway, on to the list:</p><p><strong>January: Newt Gingrich</strong></p><p>To anyone who’d just been teleported from the year 1999, the scene in Charleston, South Carolina on the night of January 21 had to be impossible to fathom: There was Newt Gingrich, the man who’d been marched off the political stage by his own party after a disastrous four-year run as House Speaker, declaring victory in a Republican presidential primary. And not just any primary: South Carolina, a historically pivotal early contest. And not just a victory – an absolute landslide.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/25/12_for_12_the_year_in_politics/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/25/12_for_12_the_year_in_politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Boehner: Can anyone govern the Crazy Caucus?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/john_boehner_can_anyone_govern_the_crazy_caucus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/john_boehner_can_anyone_govern_the_crazy_caucus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13152730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[House Speaker John Boehner looked ineffectual on Plan B -- but he just might be his party's only hope]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Boehner may not last much longer as speaker of the House – but I wouldn’t count him out. Despite having an impossible situation, he’s probably done about as well as anyone could, this week’s Plan B meltdown notwithstanding. He may, as Steve Kornacki <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/the_humiliation_of_john_boehner/">suggests</a>, simply decide he’s had it and walk away. But House Republicans, whether moderate or conservative, would be foolish to encourage it.</p><p>For most of the 20th century, speaker of the House wasn’t a particularly important job – powerful committee chairs ruled, and speakers could do little about it. A long process of reform, however, removed most of the clout of those barons and strengthened party leadership, making modern speakers far more powerful than their mid-century predecessors. Since the modern speakership emerged in the 1970s, there have been three basic models of how to handle the office:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/john_boehner_can_anyone_govern_the_crazy_caucus/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/john_boehner_can_anyone_govern_the_crazy_caucus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Newt still won&#8217;t admit</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/what_newt_still_wont_admit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/what_newt_still_wont_admit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13120157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once upon a time, Gingrich guaranteed that raising taxes on the rich would trigger a recession. It didn't]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1993, Democrats controlled both the legislative and executive branches, and they used their power that year to raise taxes on the top 1.2 percent of income-earners, creating a new top marginal rate of 39.6 percent. When that budget cleared the House (on a 218-216 vote in which every Republican voted no), the GOP whip issued a bold and frightening prediction:</p><p>“I believe this will lead to a recession next year,” Newt Gingrich said. “This is the Democrat machine’s recession. And each one of them will be held personally accountable.”</p><p>He still hasn’t come to terms with how wrong he was, and neither has his party. Nearly 20 years after Gingrich uttered those words, the debate in Washington carries echoes of that ’93 fight, with Barack Obama and congressional Democrats demanding a return to the Clinton rates for the top two percent of income-earners and with Republicans, who have not provided a single vote for a tax increase in all of the intervening years, doing their best to resist.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/what_newt_still_wont_admit/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/what_newt_still_wont_admit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gingrich: GOP &#8220;is incapable of competing&#8221; if Hillary runs in 2016</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/gingrich_gop_is_incapable_of_competing_if_hillary_runs_in_2016/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/gingrich_gop_is_incapable_of_competing_if_hillary_runs_in_2016/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 20:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meet the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13119806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Trying to win that will be truly the Superbowl," Newt said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans right now are not much of a match for Hillary Clinton should she decide to run for president in 2016, Newt Gingrich said.</p><p>"Every Republican should focused on what we just talked about," Gingrich told David Gregory on Meet the Press. "I mean, if their competitor in '16 ia going to be Hillary Clinton, supported by Bill Clinton, and presumably a still relatively popular President Barack Obama, trying to win that will be truly the Superbowl. And the Republican party today is incapable of competing at that level."</p><p>Watch, via <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/gingrich-if-hillary-clinton-runs-in-2016-current-gop-incapable-of-competing/">Mediaite</a>:</p><p><iframe src="http://videos.mediaite.com/embed/player/?content=915DZF0TWSHSHK6Z&amp;content_type=content_item&amp;layout=&amp;playlist_cid=&amp;media_type=video&amp;widget_type_cid=svp&amp;read_more=1" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/gingrich_gop_is_incapable_of_competing_if_hillary_runs_in_2016/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/gingrich_gop_is_incapable_of_competing_if_hillary_runs_in_2016/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newt Gingrich gets surprise role in &#8220;Parks and Recreation&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/newt_gingrich_gets_surprise_role_in_parks_and_recreation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/newt_gingrich_gets_surprise_role_in_parks_and_recreation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 16:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parks and Recreation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indianapolis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13114349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former Speaker of the House unknowingly walked onto the set of the NBC sitcom]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NBC's "Parks and Recreation," set in fictional town Pawnee, Indiana, this week filmed in Indianapolis, where the cast had a serendipitous run-in with former House speaker Newt Gingrich. "It was a completely random chance," said co-creator <a title="http://www.indystar.com/article/20121203/THINGSTODO/121203017/-Parks-Recreation-Men-Pawnee-chow-down-St-Elmo-Steak-House?odyssey=tab%7Ctopnews%7Ctext%7CIndyStar.com&amp;nclick_check=1" href="http://www.indystar.com/article/20121203/THINGSTODO/121203017/-Parks-Recreation-Men-Pawnee-chow-down-St-Elmo-Steak-House?odyssey=tab%7Ctopnews%7Ctext%7CIndyStar.com&amp;nclick_check=1">Mike Schur to the Indianapolis Star</a>. "But you can't pass up an opportunity like that."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/newt_gingrich_gets_surprise_role_in_parks_and_recreation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/newt_gingrich_gets_surprise_role_in_parks_and_recreation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newt to Colbert: I lost because Romney had more billionaire friends</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/newt_to_colbert_i_lost_because_romney_had_more_billionaire_friends/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/newt_to_colbert_i_lost_because_romney_had_more_billionaire_friends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Colbert Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Colbert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13072582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former presidential candidate talked to Colbert about the "billionaire fight" that was the election]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 4px;">Newt Gingrich stopped by "The Colbert Report" and talked to Stephen Colbert about super PACs and his primary loss to Mitt Romney, pointing out that he had a billionaire friend who helped him out a lot (Sheldon Adelson), but Romney had many more billionaire friends.</div><div style="padding: 4px;">"It turned out 26 billionaires beat one," Gingrich said.</div><div style="padding: 4px;">"That would make a great reality show, Billionaire Fight," Colbert replied.</div><div style="padding: 4px;">"We just had it, it was called the election," Gringrich shot back.</div><div style="padding: 4px;">Watch Part 1:</div><div style="padding: 4px;"><iframe src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/embed/mgid:cms:video:colbertnation.com:421235" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/newt_to_colbert_i_lost_because_romney_had_more_billionaire_friends/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/newt_to_colbert_i_lost_because_romney_had_more_billionaire_friends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Bill Kristol could split the GOP in two</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/how_bill_kristol_could_split_the_gop_in_two/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/how_bill_kristol_could_split_the_gop_in_two/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 12:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Kristol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George H.W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13069042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The influential conservative's call for a tax hike on the rich risks re-launching the Republican civil war of 1990]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest news on Sunday was Bill Kristol’s <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/sunday_best_gop_open_to_raising_taxes/">declaration</a> on “Fox News Sunday” that Republicans should give in on President Obama’s demand that tax rates go up on income over $250,000 as part of any fiscal “<a href="http://video.msnbc.msn.com/the-cycle/49749182">cliff</a>” deal.</p><p>“It won’t kill the country if we raise taxes a little bit on millionaires,” he said. “It really won’t, I don’t think. I don’t really understand why Republicans don’t take Obama’s offer.”</p><p>As Alex Seitz-Wald <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/sunday_best_gop_open_to_raising_taxes/">explained yesterday</a>, this is a potentially huge development. For more than two decades now, the Republican Party has been absolutely, unanimously opposed to income tax hikes. This might just be Kristol speaking for Kristol and no one else, but if his words signal – or trigger – an actual shift within the party, the policy consequences will be serious. It could also set off an intraparty civil war.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/how_bill_kristol_could_split_the_gop_in_two/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/how_bill_kristol_could_split_the_gop_in_two/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jon Stewart on political pundit hackery</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/must_see_morning_clip_59/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/must_see_morning_clip_59/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 13:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily Show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must see morning clip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political pundits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13063858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tomorrow, Jon Stewart says, "we’ll know which pundits were wrong, which were wronger" about the election]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon Stewart mocks the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/dont_be_scared_of_number_wizard_nate_silver_pundits/">hackery of political pundits</a> (specifically Newt Gingrich).</p><div style="background-color:#000000;width:430px;"> <div style="padding:4px;"><iframe src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/embed/mgid:cms:video:thedailyshow.com:420751" width="512" height="288" frameborder="0"></iframe> <p style="text-align:left;background-color:#FFFFFF;padding:4px;margin-top:4px;margin-bottom:0px;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;"><b><a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mon-november-5-2012/democalypse-2012---what-doesn-t-kill-us-makes-us-stronger-edition---media-accountability">The Daily Show with Jon Stewart</a></b><br/>Get More: <a href='http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/'>Daily Show Full Episodes</a>,<a href='http://www.indecisionforever.com/'>Political Humor & Satire Blog</a>,<a href='http://www.facebook.com/thedailyshow'>The Daily Show on Facebook</a></p> </div> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/must_see_morning_clip_59/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/must_see_morning_clip_59/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gingrich supporters warned of a third Obama term</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/gingrich_supporters_warned_of_a_third_obama_term/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/gingrich_supporters_warned_of_a_third_obama_term/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 21:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13061063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An email mistakenly sent to Newt's followers said that Obama will win this year, but 2016 is the real problem]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An email accidentally sent to a Newt Gingrich newsletter's list of subscribers warns that Barack Obama is going to win this election -- but it's 2016 that we all need to worry about now.</p><p><a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/errant-email-newt-gingrich-supporters-obama-win/story?id=17618977#.UJQi9ml24fy">ABC News</a> reports:</p><blockquote><p>Conservative news group Human Events manages the Gingrich Marketplace emails, but Gingrich has a say over which advertisers can have their messages go out to the list. And according to Gingrich spokesman R.C. Hammond, Stansberry &amp; Associates should have been on the blacklist.</p> <p>Human Events Vice President Joe Guerriero said the email was 'a mistake.'"</p></blockquote><p>The email was supposed to go to another Human Events list, Guerriero said.</p><p>"The truth is, the next election has already been decided. Obama is going to win. It's nearly impossible to beat an incumbent president," wrote Porter Stansberry in the email. "What's actually at stake right now is whether or not he will have a third-term."</p><p>Though Obama is prohibited from seeking a third term by the 22nd amendment, the email did not address this, and it even suggested he could stay president until 2020.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/gingrich_supporters_warned_of_a_third_obama_term/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/gingrich_supporters_warned_of_a_third_obama_term/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sunday best: GOP pretends no one cares about abortion</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/28/sunday_best_gop_tries_to_pretend_no_one_cares_about_abortion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/28/sunday_best_gop_tries_to_pretend_no_one_cares_about_abortion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2012 18:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunday shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunday Best]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya embassy attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricane Sandy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13055451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson says people care more about the GOP's Libya analysis than women's rights]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With a major storm and presidential election arriving within a week of each other, the penultimate batch of Sunday morning political talk shows before the election were dominated by talk of how Hurricane Sandy might impact the election. But abortion and Libya also made appearances. Wisconsin Republican Sen. Ron Johnson wins our award for hackiest political analysis of the week (and there’s a lot of competition) for saying people care more about the GOP’s pet Libyan conspiracy theory than about abortion.</p><p>As for the storm, everyone, of course, said their focus is on the well-being of people in the storm’s path, but pundits couldn’t help but try to find the political angle as well. There seem to be two main theories: One is that the race will essentially be frozen in place as the media and everyone else shifts focus away from the election for the next few days. Since Obama remains slightly ahead in key swing states, this scenario is seen as helping him by preventing Romney from gaining traction. Obama could also earn points by “looking presidential” while leading a successful federal response to the disaster, pundits said.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/28/sunday_best_gop_tries_to_pretend_no_one_cares_about_abortion/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/28/sunday_best_gop_tries_to_pretend_no_one_cares_about_abortion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newt&#8217;s revolting appeal to voters</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/26/the_political_ad_to_end_all_ads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/26/the_political_ad_to_end_all_ads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mosque]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super PAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political ads]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13053795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This new three-minute mini-film from Gingrich's super PAC is the last ad you'll ever need to watch]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mix together every right-wing fever dream of the Obama era, add some apocalyptic b-roll and epic music, and bake for three minutes in Newt Gingrich-style grandiosity and you get <a href="http://youtu.be/642KbtSiMbA">this amazing new ad</a> from the super PAC that supported Gingrich, which apparently still exists. If every other ad of the cycle was a music video, this ad is "Thriller."</p><p>The video is an imagining of what another four years under Obama would look like, and it’s not too rosy. Picture turning the whole country into blighted Detroit while gays run wild and churches are converted to mosques. There are lots and lots of riots. Riots in the inner cities (naturally), riots in the Middle East, riots at gas stations, riots in supermarkets, riots in the hospital over Obamacare. Fortunately, Obama appears to have implemented martial law so there's plenty of riot cops too. Meanwhile, gay men get married -- to each other! -- in modest little ceremonies by the water as crosses are chopped down with chainsaws and churches are converted to mosques. Abroad, Muslims are totally pissed at Obama for appeasing them, or something, and Iran builds literally <a href="http://twitpic.com/b7klpp">dozens</a> of nuclear sites. Florida also loses all of its electricity for some reason and the Statue of Liberty's face becomes a skull. For good measure, there’s even an allusion to George Orwell’s "1984," or rather <a href="http://youtu.be/OYecfV3ubP8">Apple’s classic commercial</a> riffing on the book.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/26/the_political_ad_to_end_all_ads/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/26/the_political_ad_to_end_all_ads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nine most racist moments of the 2012 election</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/16/nine_most_racist_moments_of_the_2012_election/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/16/nine_most_racist_moments_of_the_2012_election/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 13:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The 47 Percent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter suppression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tucker Carlson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13041775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The "47 percent" is only the tip of the iceberg -- and the election is still weeks away]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> The son of a Wisconsin candidate for Senate turned heads over the weekend when he indulged in a favorite Republican pastime: appealing to racism to get out the vote. But that moment was only the latest in a campaign chock full of race-bating  appeals and utterances the Republican Party has been using to try to defeat Democrats.</p><p>The subtle appeals to racism, reminiscent of President Nixon's "Southern Strategy," help pave the way for the more outrageous forms of blatant racism.</p><p>From the coded appeals to the blatant manifestations, here are 9 racist things that have happened during the 2012 election campaign.</p><p><strong>1. Wisconsin Senate Candidate's Son: We Can Send Obama ‘Back to Kenya’</strong></p><p>The website <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczynski/wisconsin-gubernatorial-candidates-son-says-we-h">Buzzfeed reports</a> that yesterday morning, Jason Thompson told a crowd of supporters at a brunch that “we have the opportunity to send President Obama back to Chicago — or Kenya.” Thompson is the son of former Wisconsin governor Tommy Thompson, who is now running for Senate. In attendance at the brunch was Reince Priebus, the chairman of the Republican National Committee.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/16/nine_most_racist_moments_of_the_2012_election/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/16/nine_most_racist_moments_of_the_2012_election/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gingrich: Romney &#8220;changed&#8221; on tax cuts</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/07/gingrich_romney_changed_on_tax_cuts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/07/gingrich_romney_changed_on_tax_cuts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2012 16:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 pres]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13032970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Newt says Romney flip-flopped on his plan to cut taxes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an exchange with Robert Gibbs on NBC's "Meet The Press," Newt Gingrich admitted that Mitt Romney "changed" his position on tax cuts in last week's debate.</p><p>"I think you've got to look carefully at how Romney structured -- what he said is, something that, frankly, true supply-siders don’t necessarily love, but it’s good politics — he said, ‘I will close enough deductions that wealthy Americans will not get a net tax cut,’” Gingrich said.</p><p>Gibbs pointed out that in the Republican primary debate in Arizona, Romney said: “We’re going to cut taxes on everyone across the country by 20 percent, including the top 1 percent.”</p><p>"Was he dishonest when he said that?" Gibbs asked Gingrich.</p><p>“I think it’s clear he changed,” Gingrich replied.</p><p>Watch, via <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/10/newt-gingrich-romney-changed-on-taxes.php?ref=fpa">TPM</a>, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vtmvyw9yMx0&amp;feature=player_embedded">ThinkProgress</a>:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Vtmvyw9yMx0" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/07/gingrich_romney_changed_on_tax_cuts/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/07/gingrich_romney_changed_on_tax_cuts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll: Romney favors the rich</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/19/poll_romney_favors_the_rich/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/19/poll_romney_favors_the_rich/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13015984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Swing state voters say Romney favors the rich; the GOP frets; Gingrich for Akin; and other top Wednesday stories]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Romney for the 1 percent:</strong> A new <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/09/19/swing-state-poll-romney-favors-the-rich/">New York Times/CBS News</a> poll shows that majorities of likely voters in the swing states of Wisconsin, Virginia and Colorado say that Mitt Romney's policies favor the rich. In each state, about 55 percent say Romney is better for the rich, while a plurality say Obama's policies favor the middle class. Only a sliver of voters say the president favors the rich. This <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2012/02/17/428337/americans-agree-romney-favors-rich/">pattern</a> has been evident since the <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/03/07/439843/analysis-romney-wins-big-rich/">early GOP primaries</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/19/poll_romney_favors_the_rich/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/19/poll_romney_favors_the_rich/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quote of the day: Newt&#8217;s apology</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/05/quote_of_the_day_28/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/05/quote_of_the_day_28/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quote of the day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13001931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich apologizes for using "Eye of the Tiger"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newt Gingrich's presidential campaign is officially kaput. His dreams of being a real-life Rocky are probably dead as well, after several months of lawsuits over his campaign's use of the Survivor song "Eye of the Tiger":</p><p>"We are very sorry that your song "Eye of the Tiger" was associated with the 2012 Newt Gingrich campaign," Newt wrote to the song owners, <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2012/09/05/newt-gingrich-eye-of-the-tiger-lawsuit/">TMZ reported</a>. "We will do our utmost to assure that this does not happen again."</p><p>He's just the latest Republican to apologize to the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/22/musicians_vs_politicians/">rock gods</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/05/quote_of_the_day_28/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/05/quote_of_the_day_28/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ten ways Americans have lost their freedom</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/31/ten_ways_americans_have_lost_their_freedom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/31/ten_ways_americans_have_lost_their_freedom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 13:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12998088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our struggle for liberty has become a fight against concentrated wealth]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our most fundamental rights, to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, are under assault. But the adversary is Big Wealth, not Big Government as conservatives like to claim. Consider:</p><p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Life? The differences in life expectancy between wealthier and lower-income Americans are increasing, not decreasing.</p><p>Liberty? Digital corporations are assaulting our privacy, while banks trap us in indebtedness that approaches indentured servitude. The shrunken ranks of working Americans are being robbed of their essential liberties – including the right to use the bathroom.</p><p>The pursuit of happiness? Social mobility in the United States is dead. Career choices are increasingly limited. As for working hard and earning more, consider this: Between 1969 and 2008 the average US income went up by $11,684. How much of that went to the top 10? All of it. Income for the remaining 90 percent actually went down.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/31/ten_ways_americans_have_lost_their_freedom/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/31/ten_ways_americans_have_lost_their_freedom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A hard-hitting Politico interview with &#8220;ideas machine&#8221; Newt Gingrich</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/30/a_hard_hitting_politico_interview_with_ideas_machine_newt_gingrich/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/30/a_hard_hitting_politico_interview_with_ideas_machine_newt_gingrich/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 20:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican National Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Allen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12997345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike Allen asks Newt Gingrich why he likes zoos]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here's what I learned when Mike Allen interviewed Newt Gingrich at the Politico Hub: Newt Gingrich loves zoos because he loves animals, and many zoos are private-public partnerships.</p><p>Also: Newt Gingrich's wife, Callista, has a new children's book coming out, and it was more challenging to write than her earlier children's book. Newt's next book is about George Washington. (It is a novel.)</p><p>Newt Gingrich enjoyed Paul Ryan's speech, but he wishes Paul Ryan had said "Mr. President, she did built that" after he introduced his mom.</p><p>Here is an actual question Mike Allen -- Politico superstar reporter -- asked Newt Gingrich: "You have always been the ideas machine in the Republican Party. Are you worried that now that's going to be Paul Ryan?" Newt Gingrich, for the record, thinks there is room for <em>two</em> ideas machines in the Republican Party.</p><p>Here's another actual question Mike Allen asked Newt Gingrich: "You recently made a very fundamental change in your life: You switched to an iPhone from a BlackBerry." Wait, sorry, that's not a thing Mike Allen asked Newt Gingrich. That's just a thing Mike Allen said to Newt Gingrich while he was interviewing him.</p><p>Mike Allen <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/25/magazine/25allen-t.html?pagewanted=all">makes around a quarter of a million dollars a year.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/30/a_hard_hitting_politico_interview_with_ideas_machine_newt_gingrich/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/30/a_hard_hitting_politico_interview_with_ideas_machine_newt_gingrich/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Washington Post&#8217;s &#8220;Newt U&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/27/newt_university_quietly_brought_to_you_by_the_washington_post/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/27/newt_university_quietly_brought_to_you_by_the_washington_post/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican National Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12993519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Newt University" uses an innovative new product from the Washington Post Co.'s educational cash cow]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Call up Sallie Mae and take out some non-dischargable loans, because <a href="http://www.newtuniversity.com/">Newt University is in session!</a> Gingrich, in partnership with the Republican National Committee, is hosting a series of "policy classes" for Republican Convention delegates in Tampa this week. (Today's classes feature guest-lecturer Larry Kudlow, in what I am guessing involves a creative application of NBC News' ethics policies.) Oh, and "Newt U" will also be available online, thanks to <a href="http://www.politico.com/playbook/">"a new learning technology platform pioneered by Kaplan Inc called KAPx."</a></p><p>According to <a href="http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20120824005592/en/Kaplan-Offers-Beta-Version-KAPx%E2%84%A2-Online-Educational">a Kaplan press release</a>, KAPx (which seems to be just Google+ Hangouts meant to be sold to learning institutions at a high markup):</p><blockquote><p>“The KAPx™ platform is designed to help schools, organizations, businesses, and individuals who want to share information and knowledge in an exciting, interactive, and highly participatory manner that is aligned with the best instructional practices,” said Edward Hanapole, Kaplan Inc.’s Chief Information Officer. “We will continue to refine the platform to reflect our leadership in learning science and how to marry technological innovation with educational achievement.”</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/27/newt_university_quietly_brought_to_you_by_the_washington_post/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/27/newt_university_quietly_brought_to_you_by_the_washington_post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romney: Obama&#8217;s bringing welfare back</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/07/romney_obamas_bringing_welfare_back/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/07/romney_obamas_bringing_welfare_back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 14:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Welfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12974537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Romney campaign picks up where Gingrich left off, launching a broadside against Obama on welfare reform]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitt Romney’s campaign is seizing on a story that’s been percolating on conservative blogs for weeks, rolling out a new attack today against President Obama for “unilaterally dismantling” the bipartisan welfare reform regime signed into law by President Clinton. <a href="http://youtu.be/0F4LtTlktm0">A new ad</a> from the campaign states: "President Obama quietly announced a plan to gut welfare reform by dropping work requirements. Under Obama’s plan, you wouldn’t have to work and wouldn’t have to train for a job -- they just send you your welfare check.”</p><p>As has already been widely noted, the line of attack is complicated by a few problems. First of all, it’s not true, or at least wildly misleading. Obama’s plan doesn't end work requirements, but rather <a href="http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ofa/policy/im-ofa/2012/im201203/im201203.html">grants waivers</a> to states that propose alternative requirements that suit them better than a one-size-fits-all federal plan, something conservatives usually  support. As the Washington Post’s Ezra Klein wrote last month, when the story first started gaining traction on the right, “The Obama administration is not removing the bill’s work requirements at all. He’s changing them to allow states more flexibility. But the principle that welfare programs must require recipients to move toward employment <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/wp/2012/07/17/is-obama-gutting-welfare-reform/">isn’t going anywhere</a>.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/07/romney_obamas_bringing_welfare_back/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/07/romney_obamas_bringing_welfare_back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>