<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Nobel Prize</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/nobel_prize/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 01:58:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Paul Ryan declares war on the poor</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/paul_ryan_declares_war_on_the_poor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/paul_ryan_declares_war_on_the_poor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nobel Prize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joseph Stiglitz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13248553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[His budget proposal would only exacerbate our country's glaring income inequality. How heartless can the GOP be?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to the Republican Party’s budget proposal that passed the U.S. House this week, I agree with those who find it strange that anyone sees the initiative as a serious attempt to “grow the economy,” as Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., claims. I also agree that the now-standard barrage of reports that accompany such an initiative render most non-political junkies confused, bored or both.</p><p>However, all of that doesn’t mean the proposal Ryan spearheaded is unimportant, nor does it mean that there are no worthwhile analyses to explain that significance. On the contrary, the proposal is quite important because it endorses an economic war waged by the upper class against everyone else. Two simple studies make this war painfully obvious.</p><p>To properly contextualize those studies, first keep in mind three facts: 1) According to Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz, “The upper 1 percent of Americans are now taking in nearly a quarter of the nation’s income every year” and control 40 percent of the nation’s total wealth, 2) the bottom 80 percent of Americans own just 7 percent of the nation’s wealth, and 3) Stiglitz notes that “while the top 1 percent have seen their incomes rise 18 percent over the past decade, those in the middle have actually seen their incomes fall.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/paul_ryan_declares_war_on_the_poor/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/paul_ryan_declares_war_on_the_poor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>106</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Krugman: Progressives worry about being &#8220;respectable&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/06/paul_krugman_progressives_worry_too_much_about_being_respectable_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/06/paul_krugman_progressives_worry_too_much_about_being_respectable_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 23:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Krugman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Rose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nobel Prize]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13221230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The celebrated economist reflects on his showdown with Joe Scarborough -- and how progressives can even the score]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the realm of media elites, Paul Krugman, New York Times columnist and winner of the Nobel Prize for economics, occupies a rare position: that of progressive hero -- the guy who speaks truth to power. I met up with Krugman at an event at the national headquarters of the AFL-CIO, hosted by Richard Trumka, the federation’s president.</p><p>It was just a day after Krugman’s debate with MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough on the Charlie Rose show had media, social and otherwise, abuzz, especially after Krugman <a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/03/04/urk-charlie-rose-edition/">blogged</a> that he wasn’t quite as sharp as he’d like to have been, unprepared, he said, for “the blizzard of misleading factoids and diversionary stuff” uttered by the cocksure, blown-dry, blustery congressman-turned-TV-host.</p><p>While the right has legions of mouthpieces reading from the same economic playbook, Krugman has emerged as the go-to guy for mainstream shows when they seek a progressive voice. So I asked him to assess, as a communicator, what progressives need to do to even up the score. Here’s his reply:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/06/paul_krugman_progressives_worry_too_much_about_being_respectable_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/06/paul_krugman_progressives_worry_too_much_about_being_respectable_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mo Yan says censorship is necessary</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/nobel_literature_winner_says_censorship_necessary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/nobel_literature_winner_says_censorship_necessary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mo Yan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nobel Prize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/nobel_literature_winner_says_censorship_necessary/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Nobel literature winner has been oft-criticized for his relationship with China's Communist Party]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>STOCKHOLM (AP) — Nobel Prize laureate Mo Yan, who has been criticized for his cozy relationship with China's Communist Party, has compared censorship to security checks at airports, suggesting it is unpleasant but necessary.</p><p>Mo says he does not believe censorship should stand in the way of truth, but that it can be used, or is sometimes even necessary, to stop rumors and defamation.</p><p>China's first writer to win the Nobel Prize for Literature is in Stockholm, where he is set to receive the prestigious prize next week.</p><p>Mo dodged questions about fellow writer and compatriot Liu Xiaobo, who won the Peace Prize in 2010 but remains in prison. Mo has previously said that he hopes Liu will be free soon, but he refused to elaborate Thursday while meeting with journalists in Stockholm.</p><p><script type='text/javascript' src='http://pshared.5min.com/Scripts/PlayerSeed.js?sid=1236&amp;width=420&amp;height=280&amp;shuffle=0&amp;playList=517505707'></script></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/nobel_literature_winner_says_censorship_necessary/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/nobel_literature_winner_says_censorship_necessary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two Americans win Nobel economics prize</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/15/two_americans_win_nobel_economics_prize/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/15/two_americans_win_nobel_economics_prize/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 12:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harvard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nobel Prize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UCLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alvin Roth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lloyd Shapley]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13040558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alvin Roth and Lloyd Shapley have worked extensively on fields of match-making]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>STOCKHOLM (AP) -- Two Americans were awarded the Nobel economics prize on Monday for studies on the match-making taking place when doctors are coupled up with hospitals, students with schools and human organs with transplant recipients.</p><p>The work of Alvin Roth and Lloyd Shapley has sparked a "flourishing field of research" and helped improve the performance of many markets, the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences said.</p><p>Roth, 60, is a professor at Harvard University in Boston. Shapley, 89, is a professor emeritus at University of California Los Angeles.</p><p>"This year's prize concerns a central economic problem: how to match different agents as well as possible," the academy said.</p><p>Shapley made early theoretical inroads into the subject, using game theory to analyze different matching methods in the 1950s and `60s. Together with U.S. economist David Gale, he developed a mathematical formula for how 10 men and 10 women could be coupled in a way so that no one would benefit from trading partners.</p><p>While that may have had little impact on marriages and divorces, the algorithm they developed has been used to better understand many different markets.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/15/two_americans_win_nobel_economics_prize/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/15/two_americans_win_nobel_economics_prize/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who is Mo Yan, anyway?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/14/who_is_mo_yan_anyway/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/14/who_is_mo_yan_anyway/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2012 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LA Review of Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nobel Prize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mo Yan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13039678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He shocked the world when he won the Nobel Prize. A Chinese scholar explains why his fiction is essential]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lareviewofbooks.org/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/LARB_LOGO_RED_LIGHT1.jpg" alt="Los Angeles Review of Books" align="left" /></a> <em>WHEN THE NOBEL PRIZE in Literature is awarded, commentators often wonder if it was given to recognize the quality of the author's writing or for other reasons: jockeying within the committee, a desire to acknowledge a particular genre or style’s importance, the wish to make a political statement — or all of the above. </em></p><p><em>These questions will doubtless be raised about Mo Yan, the latest literary Laureate, but issues specific to China will also come up, such as how he compares to previous winners<em><em> with ties to that country, like Pearl Buck, who wrote stories set there, and Gao Xingjian, the Chinese writer who won the prize after leaving his country to live and write in France. </em></em></em></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/14/who_is_mo_yan_anyway/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/14/who_is_mo_yan_anyway/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hilarious Nobel Peace Prize predictions</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/12/hilarious_nobel_peace_prize_predictions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/12/hilarious_nobel_peace_prize_predictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 20:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nobel Peace Prize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nobel Prize]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13039017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After Obama and the EU, it seems anything goes. One historian tweets some suggestions]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In recent years, commentators have scoffed at Nobel Peace Prize selections, including Barack Obama in 2009 and the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/12/responses_to_eus_nobel_peace_prize/">European Union this year</a>. CUNY historian and <a href="http://studentactivism.net/">activist organizer</a> Angus Johnston took to Twitter Friday to predict some future honorees. They're too good to keep to myself:</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>[embedtweet id="256825338569568257"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="256825675032444928"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="256830883057774593"]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/12/hilarious_nobel_peace_prize_predictions/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/12/hilarious_nobel_peace_prize_predictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Responses to EU&#8217;s Nobel Peace Prize</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/12/responses_to_eus_nobel_peace_prize/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/12/responses_to_eus_nobel_peace_prize/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 15:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nobel Prize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austerity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eurozone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nobel Peace Prize]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13038469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some say the choice is "nonsense," others see it as an important morale boost for the beleaguered union]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Nobel Peace Prize this year has been awarded to the European Union for promoting and upholding "60 years of peace in Europe." The (often controversial) award has again produced a mixed response, as critics question the honor in the midst the eurozone crisis, as austerity, unrest, unemployment and rising fascism plague member states.</p><p>The reasoning behind the award selection seems both transparent and politics-driven. Thorbjorn Jagland, the former Norwegian prime minister who is chairman of the panel awarding the prize, has openly expressed concern about the European Union's future in light of the debt crisis and attendant upheavals.</p><p>"There is a great danger ... We see already now an increase of extremism and nationalistic attitudes. There is a real danger that Europe will start disintegrating. Therefore, we should focus again on the fundamental aims of the organization,” said Jagland.</p><p>And indeed, following Jagland's logic, a number of commentators have praised the Nobel choice as an important boost and encouragement for the beleagured 27-nation bloc.</p><p>Heather Grabbe, director of the Open Society Institute in Brussels,<a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-19924216"> told the BBC:</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/12/responses_to_eus_nobel_peace_prize/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/12/responses_to_eus_nobel_peace_prize/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>European Union awarded Nobel Peace Prize</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/12/european_union_awarded_nobel_peace_prize/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/12/european_union_awarded_nobel_peace_prize/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 11:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nobel Peace Prize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nobel Prize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eurozone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13038266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Honor comes as 27-nation bloc was struggling with its biggest crisis since it was created in the 1950s]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OSLO, Norway (AP) -- The European Union won the Nobel Peace Prize on Friday for promoting peace and democracy in Europe -- an honor that came as 27-nation bloc was struggling with its biggest crisis since it was created in the 1950s.</p><p>The Norwegian prize committee said the EU was being honored Friday for six decades of contributions "to the advancement of peace and reconciliation, democracy and human rights in Europe."</p><p>"The stabilizing part played by the European Union has helped to transform a once-torn Europe from a continent of war to a continent of peace," Nobel committee chairman Thorbjoern Jagland said.</p><p>The EU grew out of the tremendous devastation of World War II, fueled by the conviction that ever-closer economic ties would make sure that century-old enemies never turned on each other again. It's now made up of 500 million people in 27 nations, with other nations lined up, waiting to join.</p><p>But the European project is now facing its greatest challenge yet -- a debt crisis that has stirred deep tensions between north and south, caused unemployment to soar, and prompted hundreds of thousands of its citizens to take to the streets protesting tax hikes and job cuts. The bloc's financial disarray is threatening the euro -- the common currency used by 17 of its members -- and even the structure of the union itself.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/12/european_union_awarded_nobel_peace_prize/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/12/european_union_awarded_nobel_peace_prize/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In praise of Nobel obscurity</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/in_praise_of_nobel_obscurity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/in_praise_of_nobel_obscurity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 16:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Dylan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nobel Prize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Literary Prizes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philip Roth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers and Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mo Yan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13037043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quit saying the Nobel Prize should go to Philip Roth or Bob Dylan]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like a lot of people, I greeted today's news that Chinese writer Mo Yan has won the 2012 Nobel Prize in Literature with the familiar feeling that the Swedish Academy had me on the back foot. I have never read a word the man has written. I comforted myself with the thin reassurance that at least I'd heard of him — and I'd even seen "Red Sorghum," a film based on one of his best-known novels!</p><p>Unlike a substantial percentage of the back-foot club, however, I've got no problem with the Academy's choice, or its history of selecting purportedly "obscure" recipients for the prize. From the handful of articles and reviews I've read in my frantic scramble to get caught up, Mo Yan seems to write the kind of novels I enjoy (and I really did love "Red Sorghum"). "Hallucinatory realism"? "A world of magic, sexual exploitation, ignorance and senseless violence"? Individual stories told against a backdrop of political and social turmoil? Sign me up.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/in_praise_of_nobel_obscurity/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/in_praise_of_nobel_obscurity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chinese writer Mo Yan wins Nobel Prize for literature</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/chinese_writer_mo_yan_wins_nobel_prize_for_literature/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/chinese_writer_mo_yan_wins_nobel_prize_for_literature/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nobel Prize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers and Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mo Yan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13036853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Swedish Academy praised the writer for his "hallucinatory realism"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>STOCKHOLM (AP) — Chinese writer Mo Yan has been named the winner of the Nobel Prize in literature.</p><p>The Swedish Academy, which selects the winners of the prestigious award, in Thursday praised Mo's "hallucinatory realism," saying it "merges folk tales, history and the contemporary."</p><p>European authors had won four of the past five awards, with last year's prize going to Swedish poet Tomas Transtromer.</p><p>As with the other Nobel Prizes, the prize is worth 8 million kronor, or about $1.2 million.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/chinese_writer_mo_yan_wins_nobel_prize_for_literature/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/chinese_writer_mo_yan_wins_nobel_prize_for_literature/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nobel Prize for literature: This year&#8217;s favorites</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/10/nobel_prize_for_literature_this_years_favorites/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/10/nobel_prize_for_literature_this_years_favorites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 21:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nobel prize literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nobel Prize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haruki Murakami]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Literary Prizes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers and Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swedish academy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13036088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Likely winners include Haruki Murakami, Alice Munro and many writers you've never heard of]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who will win the Nobel Prize for literature? According to British gambling outfit Ladbrokes, the odds favor <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/23/1q84_love_in_an_alternate_universe/">Haruki Murakami</a>, the Japanese author of "<a href="http://www.amazon.com/1Q84-Volume-Boxed-Vintage-International/dp/0345802934/saloncom08-20">1Q84</a>," "<a href="http://www.amazon.com/The-Wind-Up-Bird-Chronicle-Novel/dp/0679775439/saloncom08-20">The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle</a>" and "<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Norwegian-Wood-Haruki-Murakami/dp/0375704027/saloncom08-20">Norwegian Wood</a>." Other top picks include the Hungarian essayist Peter Nadas ("<a href="http://www.amazon.com/End-Family-Story-Peter-Nadas/dp/0140291792/saloncom08-20">The End of a Family Story,</a>" "<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Book-Memories-Novel-P%C3%A9ter-N%C3%A1das/dp/0312427964/saloncom08-20">A Book of Memories</a>") and Irish playwright and novelist William Trevor ("Autumn Sunshine," "<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Story-Lucy-Gault-Novel/dp/014200331X/saloncom08-20">The Story of Lucy Gault</a>"<em>)</em>, who have each garnered international attention and boast a long list of literary awards.  (<a href="http://sports.ladbrokes.com/en-gb/Awards/Nobel-Literature-PrizeAwards/Nobel-Literature-Prize-t210003519">Odds listed below</a>, via Ladbrokes):</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/10/nobel_prize_for_literature_this_years_favorites/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/10/nobel_prize_for_literature_this_years_favorites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Today&#8217;s news in pictures</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/09/todays_news_in_pictures_5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/09/todays_news_in_pictures_5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 20:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[today's news in pictures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angela Merkel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nigeria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nobel Prize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerry Sandusky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Assange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lady Gaga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maldives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13034955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today's top stories include Lady Gaga, Jerry Sandusky and German Chancellor Angela Merkel]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[slide_show id=13034863]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/09/todays_news_in_pictures_5/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/09/todays_news_in_pictures_5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stem cell pioneers win Nobel Prize</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/08/stem_cell_pioneers_win_nobel_prize/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/08/stem_cell_pioneers_win_nobel_prize/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Gurdon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cloning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nobel Prize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stem cells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shinya Yamanaka]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13033435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two scientists share award for work on adult cells, which "revolutionized" science]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two stem cell research pioneers have been recognized with a Nobel Prize. John Gurdon from the U.K. and Shinya Yamanaka from Japan were announced Monday as this year's medicine prizewinners for their work on turning adult cells back into stem cells.</p><p>A release from the Nobel Committee said that the scientists' work "revolutionized" science. In 1962, Gurdon showed that the genetic information inside a cell taken from a frog's gut contained all the information needed to clone a whole frog. He took the genetic information and placed it inside a frog egg. The resulting clone developed into a normal tadpole. This technique was later used to create the first cloned mammal, Dolly the sheep.</p><p>In 2006, Yamanaka showed how mature cells in mice could essentially be reprogrammed and turned back to earlier cell states. This discovery presented an alternative to the use of embryonic stem cells, considered by some to be ethically problematic.</p><p>It is hoped that stem cell research, still in its early stages, could provide cures for diseases including Alzheimer's and Parkinson's.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/08/stem_cell_pioneers_win_nobel_prize/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/08/stem_cell_pioneers_win_nobel_prize/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stiglitz&#8217;s plea for compassionate capitalism</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/21/stiglitz_plea_for_compassionate_capitalism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/21/stiglitz_plea_for_compassionate_capitalism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nobel Prize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joseph Stiglitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13017904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At a recent talk, the Nobel Prize-winner asks: Can the ideology of capitalism bend to justice and love?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Cash payment is not the sole nexus between man and man. ~Thomas Carlyle</em></p><p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Even after a terrible financial crisis exposed their folly, the High Priests of Old Time Economics still speak the cold, barren language of self-interest. Acting solely in your own interest, they preach, is the key to efficiency and human well-being.</p><p>Not Joseph Stiglitz. Wednesday night, the Nobel Prize-winner spoke to a packed chapel at New York City’s Union Theological Seminary, which, along with the <a href="http://ineteconomics.org/">Institute for New Economic Thinking</a> (INET), a New York-based think tank, hosted the first conversation in a brand-new series meant to change the way we understand economic issues.  Union Theological Seminary president Dr. Serene Jones, INET Executive Director Robert Johnson, Professor Gary Dorrien of Union Theological Seminary and Columbia University, and Betty Sue Flowers, Director of the Lyndon Baines Johnson Library and Museum, joined Stiglitz to talk about the topic at hand: “Economics &amp; Theology.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/21/stiglitz_plea_for_compassionate_capitalism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/21/stiglitz_plea_for_compassionate_capitalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What can we learn from the Great Depression?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/27/what_can_we_learn_from_the_great_depression/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/27/what_can_we_learn_from_the_great_depression/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Great Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nobel Prize]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12992570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robert Barro, a professor at Harvard, takes issue with perceived wisdoms about America's greatest economic collapse]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div> <div> <p><strong>So if I want to understand what happened during the Great Depression – and even what the Obama administration is trying to do now – do I have to start by reading John Maynard Keynes’s <em>General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money</em>?</strong></p> <p><a href="http://thebrowser.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://thebrowser.com/sites/all/themes/brw/logo.png" alt="The Browser" width="150" align="left" /></a> You’re better off reading Milton Friedman and Anna Jacobson Schwartz’s <em>A Monetary History of the United States</em>, which I think is a better account. Keynes was more contemporary, so maybe had not as much perspective.</p> <p><strong>This is the argument that the Federal Reserve caused the Great Depression, prompting <a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/speeches/2002/20021108/default.htm">Ben Bernanke’s famous apology to the authors</a>. So why does this book need to be read, in your view?</strong></p> <p>I think it appropriately looks at the monetary financial situation that is at the core of the Great Depression crisis and also the current situation. So they focus on the role of the monetary authority and the banking panics, and you can fit into that the legislative changes – particularly under Franklin Roosevelt ­– some of which helped the situation. I think the most important of those was the introduction of deposit insurance in 1934, with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The FDIC has really worked in preventing banking panics since that time in the US. I think a lot of the solutions these days involve extending that concept beyond the commercial banks that were at the heart of the financial system in the 1930s, but of course the system has been much broadened since then.</p> </div> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/27/what_can_we_learn_from_the_great_depression/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/27/what_can_we_learn_from_the_great_depression/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stiglitz: The inequality crisis</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/26/stiglitz_the_inequality_crisis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/26/stiglitz_the_inequality_crisis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 21:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nobel Prize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inequality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12945778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Nobel Prize-winning economist says inequality is a national emergency]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz, one of America's most prescient voices, wrote an article for <em>Vanity Fair</em> several months before Occupy Wall Street was born. "Of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%" called attention to the widening gap between rich and poor and its deadly impact on our society and its democratic institutions. In his newly released book, <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0393088693/?tag=saloncom08-20">The Price of Inequality</a>,</em> Stiglitz returns to this theme of a divided society, delving into the origins and consequences of economic unfairness. I caught up with Professor Stiglitz and talked to him about how the persistent myths and beliefs associated with our capitalist system help to drive this trend, turning America from a land of opportunity to a land of broken dreams.</p><p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a><strong>Lynn Parramore: An argument has been made, particularly since the end of the Cold War, that capitalism is great at producing things that can improve our lives, and so we ought to therefore tolerate some unfairness. What's wrong with that narrative?</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/06/26/stiglitz_the_inequality_crisis/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/26/stiglitz_the_inequality_crisis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
