<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > North Dakota</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/north_dakota/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 01:58:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Federal court strikes down Arizona abortion ban</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/federal_court_strikes_down_arizona_abortion_ban/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/federal_court_strikes_down_arizona_abortion_ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roe v. Wade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unconstitutional laws]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13305417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The panel called the abortion law unconstitutional "under a long line of invariant Supreme Court precedents"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A federal appellate panel has struck down an Arizona law banning abortion at 20 weeks, calling it unconstitutional “under a long line of invariant Supreme Court precedents” guaranteeing a woman's right to an abortion.</p><p>The ban would also have severely restricted emergency abortion care for women with high-risk pregnancies, forcing doctors to wait until a woman's condition posed an immediate threat of death or catastrophic damage before offering her appropriate medical care.</p><p>In its opinion, the panel rejected what they deemed an undue legislative intrusion into the doctor-patient relationship, as the New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/22/us/arizonas-ban-on-abortions-struck-down-in-federal-court.html?ref=todayspaper" target="_blank">reports</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/federal_court_strikes_down_arizona_abortion_ban/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/federal_court_strikes_down_arizona_abortion_ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>North Dakota lawmaker: Blame Roe v. Wade for school shootings</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/north_dakota_lawmaker_blame_roe_v_wade_for_school_shootings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/north_dakota_lawmaker_blame_roe_v_wade_for_school_shootings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 21:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reproductive health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aurora shooting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13300842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rep. Kevin Cramer cited "abortion on demand" as the reason "our culture sees school shootings so often"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In his remarks at the University of Mary's 2013 commencement, Rep. Kevin Cramer (R-ND) blamed Roe v. Wade for tragedies like the Sandy Hook and Aurora theater shootings. Because Cramer, who has a <a href="http://www.ontheissues.org/House/Kevin_Cramer_Gun_Control.htm" target="_blank">perfect AQ rating</a> from the National Rifle Association, certainly wouldn't think gun violence has anything to do with, you know, guns.</p><p>An excerpt (emphasis mine):</p><blockquote><p>Just in the last several days, a Bismarck news anchor mistakenly uttered vulgarity on live television. He's been heralded by celebrities from New York to California as some sort of pop icon. His bosses have been called goons because they fired him.</p> <p>We learned this week that the Pentagon is vetting its guide on religious tolerance with a group that compared Christian evangelism to rape, and advocated that military personnel and colluding chaplains who proselytize should be court-marshalled.</p> <p><strong>Forty years ago, the United States Supreme Court sanctioned abortion on demand. And we wonder why our culture sees school shootings so often.</strong></p></blockquote><p>Not exactly "<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFt7EzpsZQo" target="_blank">This is water</a>," is it?</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/north_dakota_lawmaker_blame_roe_v_wade_for_school_shootings/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/north_dakota_lawmaker_blame_roe_v_wade_for_school_shootings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal challenges begin against North Dakota&#8217;s draconian abortion laws</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/legal_challenges_begin_against_north_dakotas_draconian_abortion_laws/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/legal_challenges_begin_against_north_dakotas_draconian_abortion_laws/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 16:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reproductive health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TRAP laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13299432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Advocates have filed the first of several lawsuits expected against North Dakota's restrictive abortion laws]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>North Dakota's last remaining abortion clinic has filed a suit challenging a law that requires doctors who perform abortions to obtain hospital-admitting privileges, the first in a series of legal challenges reproductive rights advocates have promised to wage against the state's draconian abortion restrictions.</p><p>The Red River Women's Clinic argues in the suit that the law could make abortion impossible to access in the state, effectively banning it.</p><p>President and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights Nancy Northup, a co-sponsor of the suit, said in a statement on Wednesday that the law is a dangerous barrier to safe abortion care that could jeopardize women's health: "With their relentless campaign to end safe and legal abortion in North Dakota, lawmakers have effectively told the women of their state, 'We don't care about your health, we don't care about your safety, and we sure don't care about your constitutional and human rights.'"</p><p>As the Associated Press <a href="http://bigstory.ap.org/article/legal-challenges-begin-against-nd-abortion-laws" target="_blank">notes</a>, the requirements mandated by the law, set to take effect on August 1, are almost impossible for the state's last remaining clinic to comply with: "Opponents of the measure say it's impossible for abortion doctors in North Dakota to meet the minimum number of hospital visits required for because the procedure is safe and women rarely need further care."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/legal_challenges_begin_against_north_dakotas_draconian_abortion_laws/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/legal_challenges_begin_against_north_dakotas_draconian_abortion_laws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Voters not taking failed gun control legislation lightly</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/voters_not_taking_failed_gun_control_legislation_lightly_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/voters_not_taking_failed_gun_control_legislation_lightly_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 16:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne LaPierre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Manchin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quinnipiac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Policy Polling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13286811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There have been drops in support for five different senators who did not vote for expanded background checks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" /></a> The backlash against Senators from both parties who voted on April 17 against an expanded background check law for gun buyers is growing, despite knee-jerk comments from mainstream media that gun control proponents lack the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/04/16/why-gun-control-laws-are-so-hard-to-pass/">fervor</a> and <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dc/2013/04/gun-control-polls-to-comfort-the-left">commitment</a> of the NRA and its allies.</p><p>The first sign that some of the 54 senators who <a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/294571-senate-rejects-tougher-background-checks-on-gun-purchases">voted</a> against the background check bill were in trouble came from New Hampshire, where first-term Republican Sen. Kelly Ayotte’s approval rating <a href="http://www.nationalmemo.com/kelly-ayottes-approval-rating-plummets-after-vote-against-background-checks/">fell</a> to 44 percent, a 15 percent drop from a survey last fall by Public Policy Polling. New Hampshire newspapers slammed her vote, with the <em>Concord Monitor </em><a href="http://www.concordmonitor.com/home/5771945-95/editorial-washington-gun-vote-was-a-double-abomination">calling</a> it “utter nonsense” and an “abomination.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/voters_not_taking_failed_gun_control_legislation_lightly_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/voters_not_taking_failed_gun_control_legislation_lightly_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>David Letterman urges North Dakota station to re-hire A.J. Clemente</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/david_letterman_urges_north_dakota_station_to_re_hire_a_j_clemente/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/david_letterman_urges_north_dakota_station_to_re_hire_a_j_clemente/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 13:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A.J. Clemente]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Letterman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news anchor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news bloopers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13281660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The inexperienced anchor was fired on his first day after cursing on-air]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ironically, WVU grad A.J. Clemente's broadcasting career has really taken off after being fired from his first day as an anchor for muttering "Fucking...Shit" on the air earlier this week.</p><p>On Wednesday, Clemente appeared on the "Today" show and "Late Show" with David Letterman to discuss the firing. Letterman even rallied for getting Clemente his job back:</p><p>"I'm telling you, this is nothing," Letterman told Clemente. "People who have been in the business for decades have had this happen to them -- some even <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/6_memorable_news_blooper/">knowing they were on camera have done things like this</a>. You, my friend, have nothing to worry about."</p><p>But the unexpected stardom may have already gone to Clemente's head, who joked, "I’ve thought about it, but if, you know, ESPN comes knocking…”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/david_letterman_urges_north_dakota_station_to_re_hire_a_j_clemente/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/david_letterman_urges_north_dakota_station_to_re_hire_a_j_clemente/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback signs sweeping anti-choice bill into law</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/kansas_gov_sam_brownback_signs_sweeping_anti_choice_bill_into_law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/kansas_gov_sam_brownback_signs_sweeping_anti_choice_bill_into_law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 16:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-choice laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkansas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13278551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Among other anti-choice provisions, the bill states that "life" begins at fertilization under Kansas law ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback has signed a sweeping antiabortion omnibus bill into law, reaffirming the state's current ban on abortion at 20 weeks (without exceptions for rape or serious fetal anomalies), blocking tax breaks for abortion providers, expanding "conscience protections" for anti-choice groups and writing into state law that life begins "at fertilization."</p><p>It is, in effect, an antiabortion greatest-hits law.</p><p>At the bill's signing ceremony, the arch-conservative governor applauded the Legislature for passing the measure with sweeping margins and <a href="http://www.kansascity.com/2013/04/19/4191137/kan-governor-signs-sweeping-anti.html?utm_source=nar.al&amp;utm_medium=urlshortener&amp;utm_campaign=Twitter" target="_blank">announced</a>:  "All human life is sacred. It's beautiful. With this, we continue to build this culture of life in our state."</p><div>Sadly, states like Arkansas and North Dakota have moved the bar for judging antiabortion legislation so far to the right that Kansas' 20-week ban seems "modest" when compared to North Dakota's six-weeks and Arkansas' 12 weeks. But make no mistake: The Kansas law is equally dangerous for women, and still violates the accepted definition of fetal viability as defined by Roe v. Wade.</div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/kansas_gov_sam_brownback_signs_sweeping_anti_choice_bill_into_law/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/kansas_gov_sam_brownback_signs_sweeping_anti_choice_bill_into_law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>News anchor drops f-bomb during television debut</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/news_anchor_drops_f_bomb_during_television_debut/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/news_anchor_drops_f_bomb_during_television_debut/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13278438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[North Dakota news anchor A.J. Clemente can also be heard muttering "gay" into the live mic ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>North Dakota-based news anchor A.J. Clemente introduced himself to NBC's KFYR-TV viewers on Sunday night with three little words: "Gay... Fucking... Shit."</p><p>Clemente did not realize his mic was on during the intro credits to his first on-air news segment, and insists he was not saying "gay," but was instead practicing the pronunciation of London Marathon winner Tsegaye Kebede's first name. (Related: London Marathon runner "Fucking Shit" seems to have placed 4th in the race.)</p><p>Clemente has since been suspended, according to a <a href="https://www.facebook.com/KFYRtv/posts/10151395694539103" target="_blank">statement</a> from the station:</p><blockquote><p>To all of you who are writing in...I want to apologize for an incident that occurred prior to our early newscast this evening, when one of our employees used profanity on the air.</p> <p>He did not realize his microphone was on, but still, that's no excuse. WE train our reporters to always assume that any microphone is live at any time. Unfortunately, that was not enough in this case. WE can't take back what was said. The person involved has been suspended until we resolve the situation. All we can do at this point is ask for your forgiveness, and I can offer my personal assurance that I will do my best to ensure that nothing like this ever happens again under my watch.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/news_anchor_drops_f_bomb_during_television_debut/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/news_anchor_drops_f_bomb_during_television_debut/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Critically ill woman faces jail time if she goes forward with lifesaving abortion</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/critically_ill_woman_faces_jail_time_if_she_goes_forward_with_life_saving_abortion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/critically_ill_woman_faces_jail_time_if_she_goes_forward_with_life_saving_abortion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 18:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[el salvador]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reproductive justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Savita Halappanavar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion care]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13275364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In addition to her health complications, doctors have confirmed that the fetus has anencephaly and is nonviable]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a report from Amnesty International, a seriously ill and pregnant El Salvadorian woman may face jail time if she goes forward with a lifesaving and medically recommended abortion. Abortion is illegal under all circumstances in El Salvador.</p><p>The 22-year-old mother of one, identified only as Beatriz, is four-and-a-half months pregnant, but her doctors have confirmed that the fetus has anencephaly (developing without a brain and certain parts of the skull) and that the pregnancy is nonviable. In addition to the fetal diagnosis, Beatriz is experiencing critical health complications related to her lupus and kidney disease.</p><p>The hospital treating Beatriz requested legal permission to perform the abortion more than a month ago, but authorities have still not agreed to let them proceed. Now, if <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/the_nations_most_extreme_abortion_law_and_the_man_behind_it/" target="_blank">government</a> <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/north_dakota_sends_its_three_extreme_anti_abortion_measures_to_governors_desk/" target="_blank">policy</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/06/alabama_lawmaker_i_take_my_abortion_cues_from_god/" target="_blank">religious</a> <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/17/fiscally_conservative_lawmaker_happy_to_spend_tax_payer_millions_to_defend_abortion_ban/" target="_blank">ideology</a> interfering with a woman's right to access abortion care or a doctor's ability to exercise medical judgment and save a woman's life <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/leaked_hospital_report_includes_dark_details_of_savita_halappanavars_death/" target="_blank">sounds familiar</a>, it should.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/critically_ill_woman_faces_jail_time_if_she_goes_forward_with_life_saving_abortion/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/critically_ill_woman_faces_jail_time_if_she_goes_forward_with_life_saving_abortion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>60</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>North Dakota, socialist haven?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/north_dakota_is_bringing_socialism_back_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/north_dakota_is_bringing_socialism_back_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 16:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of North Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Bank]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13255687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The booming Bank of North Dakota proves the oil-rich state is red in more ways than one]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>North Dakota is the very definition of a red state. It voted 58 percent to 39 percent for Romney over Obama, and its statehouse and senate have a total of 104 Republicans and only 47 Democrats. The Republican super-majority is so conservative it recently passed the nation's most severe <a href="http://www.marshfieldnewsherald.com/viewart/20130322/MNH01/130322066/ND-becomes-first-state-pass-Fetal-Personhood-Ammendment">anti-abortion resolution</a> – a measure that declares a fertilized human egg has the same right to life as a fully formed person.</p><p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" /></a> But North Dakota is also red in another sense: it fully supports its state-owned Bank of North Dakota (BND), a socialist relic that exists nowhere else in America. Why is financial socialism still alive in North Dakota? Why haven't the North Dakotan free-market crusaders slain it dead?</p><p>Because it works.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/north_dakota_is_bringing_socialism_back_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/north_dakota_is_bringing_socialism_back_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Libertarians name North Dakota &#8220;most free&#8221; state</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/28/libertarians_name_north_dakota_most_free_state/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/28/libertarians_name_north_dakota_most_free_state/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 21:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mercatus Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Koch Brothers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13254979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, women! Your "freedoms" aren't as important as freedom from excessive taxation]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Mercatus Center, a libertarian-oriented -- and Koch brothers-affiliated -- think tank based out of George Mason University (a public university, for whatever that's worth), regularly releases its ranking of American states in terms of "Freedom." Their definition of "freedom" largely adheres to the standard American libertarian conception of "liberty," which is to say it is oriented almost entirely around private property ownership and low taxation. As a result, <a href="http://freedominthe50states.org/">America's freest state this year turns out to be North Dakota.</a></p><p>North Dakota has also been in the news for another reason recently. What was it, again? Oh, right, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/27/us/north-dakota-governor-signs-strict-abortion-limits.html?pagewanted=all&amp;_r=0">it passed the most restrictive antiabortion laws in the country.</a> Including a law specifically aimed at shutting down the state's lone abortion provider. It passed this law <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/28/this_is_what_losing_looks_like/">knowing it was unconstitutional</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/28/libertarians_name_north_dakota_most_free_state/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/28/libertarians_name_north_dakota_most_free_state/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>141</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;De-extinction&#8221; could spawn birth of hybrid species</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/28/de_extinction_could_spawn_birth_of_hybrid_species_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/28/de_extinction_could_spawn_birth_of_hybrid_species_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 15:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[De-extinction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13254649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cloning has allowed synthetic biologists and other scientists to blur basic biological boundaries like never before]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/page.cfm?section=rss"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/image002.jpeg" alt="Scientific American" align="left" /></a> WASHINGTON, D.C.—A bird that once darkened the skies of the 19th-century U.S. no longer exists, except as well-preserved museum specimens bearing bits of DNA. An ambitious new effort aims to use the latest techniques of genetic manipulation to <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=de-extinction-to-bring-back-extinct-species-but-challenges-conservation">bring the passenger pigeon back</a>, as North Dakotan Ben Novak, a would-be de-extinction scientist working on the <a href="http://longnow.org/revive/">Revive &amp; Restore project</a> at the Long Now Foundation, told the crowd at the <a href="http://www.ted.com/tedx/events/7650">TEDxDeExtinction</a> event here on March 15.</p><p>"This [pigeon flock] was a biological storm that was rejuvenating resources and allowing other <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/topic.cfm?id=animals">animals</a> to thrive," Novak said of the storms of <em>Ectopistes migratorius </em>feces that used to fall like rain on the landscape of eastern North America. Plus, with the <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=us-eastern-forests-resume-decline">regrowth of forest</a> on the east coast "there is more passenger pigeon habitat every year."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/28/de_extinction_could_spawn_birth_of_hybrid_species_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/28/de_extinction_could_spawn_birth_of_hybrid_species_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>North Dakota: Abortion&#8217;s new battleground</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/north_dakota_abortions_new_battleground_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/north_dakota_abortions_new_battleground_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Dalrymple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCOTUS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13253009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Officials are gearing up for heated legal disputes over the state's controversial new ban]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) — North Dakota's governor positioned the oil-rich state Tuesday as a primary battleground in the decades-old fight over abortion rights, signing into law the nation's toughest restriction on the procedure and urging lawmakers to set aside cash for an inevitable legal challenge.</p><p>Minutes after Republican Gov. Jack Dalrymple signed three anti-abortion measures — one banning them as early as six weeks into a pregnancy — unsolicited donations began pouring into the state's lone abortion clinic to help opponents prove the new laws are unconstitutional.</p><p>"Although the likelihood of this measure surviving a court challenge remains in question, this bill is nevertheless a legitimate attempt by a state legislature to discover the boundaries of Roe v. Wade," Dalrymple said in a statement, referring to the 1973 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that legalized abortion up to until a fetus is considered viable — usually at 22 to 24 weeks.</p><p>Dalrymple seemed determined to open a legal debate on the legislation, acknowledging "the constitutionality of this measure is an open question." He asked the Legislature to set aside money for a "litigation fund" that would allow the state's attorney general to defend the measure against lawsuits.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/north_dakota_abortions_new_battleground_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/north_dakota_abortions_new_battleground_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>North Dakota governor makes 6-week abortion ban official</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/north_dakota_governor_approves_6_week_abortion_ban_2_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/north_dakota_governor_approves_6_week_abortion_ban_2_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 17:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roe v. Wade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fargo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13252368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gov. Jack Dalrymple also signed into law another measure that would prohibit abortions based on genetic defects]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FARGO, N.D. (AP) — North Dakota Gov. Jack Dalrymple has signed legislation that would ban most abortions if a fetal heartbeat can be detected, something that can happen as early as six weeks into a pregnancy. The Republican governor also signed into law another measure that would makes North Dakota the first to ban abortions based on genetic defects such as Down syndrome.</p><p>Abortion-rights advocates say the measures signed Tuesday are an attempt to close the state’s sole abortion clinic in Fargo. Supporters of the so-called fetal heartbeat measure say it’s a challenge the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling that legalized abortion up until a fetus is considered viable, usually at 22 to 24 weeks.</p><p>Abortion-rights advocates say the state will have to defend the legislation in a costly legal fight.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/north_dakota_governor_approves_6_week_abortion_ban_2_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/north_dakota_governor_approves_6_week_abortion_ban_2_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservatives care more about fetuses than big banks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/if_only_conservatives_cared_about_big_banks_as_much_as_fetuses_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/if_only_conservatives_cared_about_big_banks_as_much_as_fetuses_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 12:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RobertReich.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roe v. Wade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13251984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Legislators are taking aim at abortion and gay marriage when they should be focusing on corporate greed]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We’re still legislating and regulating private morality, while at the same time ignoring the much larger crisis of public morality in America.</p><p>In recent weeks Republican state legislators have decided to thwart the Supreme Court’s 1973 decision in “Roe v. Wade,” which gave women the right to have an abortion until the fetus is viable outside the womb, usually around 24 weeks into pregnancy.</p><p>Legislators in North Dakota passed a bill banning abortions after six weeks or after a fetal heart beat had been detected, and approved a fall referendum that would ban all abortions by defining human life as beginning with conception. Lawmakers in Arkansas have banned abortions within twelve weeks of conception.</p><p>The morality brigade worries about fetuses, but not what happens to children after they’re born. They and other conservatives have been cutting funding for child nutrition, healthcare for infants and their mothers, and schools.</p><p>The new House Republican budget gets a big chunk of its savings from programs designed to help poor kids. The budget sequester already in effect takes aim at programs like Head Start, designed to improve the life chances of disadvantaged children.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/if_only_conservatives_cared_about_big_banks_as_much_as_fetuses_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/if_only_conservatives_cared_about_big_banks_as_much_as_fetuses_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Fiscally conservative&#8221; lawmaker happy to spend taxpayer millions defending unconstitutional abortion ban</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/17/fiscally_conservative_lawmaker_happy_to_spend_tax_payer_millions_to_defend_abortion_ban/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/17/fiscally_conservative_lawmaker_happy_to_spend_tax_payer_millions_to_defend_abortion_ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Mar 2013 17:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roe v. Wade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13243934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[State Rep. Bette Grande thinks taxpayers should foot the bill on legal fees over an unconstitutional abortion ban]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fast on the heels of Arkansas' 12-week abortion ban, the North Dakota state legislature has sent a measure criminalizing abortion at six weeks to Republican Gov. Jack Dalrymple for approval. If signed into law, it would become the <em>latest </em>most extreme anti-abortion measure in the country.</p><p>Dalrymple may break with his fellow Republicans to veto the unconstitutional measure, but the bill has enough support to pass without him. The Republican-controlled legislature has said the goal of the ban is to challenge Roe v. Wade, the U.S. Supreme Court ruling that defines fetal viability between 22 to 24 weeks.</p><p>Although it was overridden, Arkansas Gov. Mike Beebe explained his veto on the state's 12-week abortion ban citing how it would prove “very costly to the taxpayers” given that “lawsuits challenging unconstitutional laws also result in the losing party — in this case, the state — being ordered to pay the costs and attorneys’ fees incurred by the litigants who successfully challenge the law. Those costs and fees can be significant.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/17/fiscally_conservative_lawmaker_happy_to_spend_tax_payer_millions_to_defend_abortion_ban/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/17/fiscally_conservative_lawmaker_happy_to_spend_tax_payer_millions_to_defend_abortion_ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>North Dakota Senate passes &#8220;personhood&#8221; bill granting legal rights to fertilized eggs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/north_dakota_senate_passes_personhood_bill_granting_legal_rights_to_fertilized_eggs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/north_dakota_senate_passes_personhood_bill_granting_legal_rights_to_fertilized_eggs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fetal personhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-abortion movement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13205800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The measure now moves to the House, where abortion rights advocates fear it will pass ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is going on in North Dakota?</p><p>The state successfully passed yet another restrictive, Supreme Court-baiting antiabortion <a href="http://www.legis.nd.gov/assembly/63-2013/documents/13-8250-04000.pdf?20130212120024" target="_blank">measure</a>, this time voting to define a "person" as "an individual member of the species homo sapiens at every stage of development" -- including human embryos.</p><p>In short: They have endowed fertilized eggs with the same rights as a living, breathing person. A move that would restrict all abortions except in narrowly defined cases where a woman's life is at risk.</p><p>According to the abortion rights group <a href="http://www.ndforprivacy.com/Documents/Coaltion%20press%20release%202.18.13.pdf" target="_blank">Parents Against Personhood</a>, the bill:</p><blockquote><p>Contains an exception for “medical treatment of life-threatening conditions of pregnancy”, for “contraception administered before clinically diagnosable pregnancy,” and for “screening, collecting, preparing, transferring, or cryopreserving of a human being created through in vitro fertilization for the purpose of being transferred to a human uterus”.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/north_dakota_senate_passes_personhood_bill_granting_legal_rights_to_fertilized_eggs/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/north_dakota_senate_passes_personhood_bill_granting_legal_rights_to_fertilized_eggs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>68</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New oil workers key bloc in ND Senate race</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/05/new_oil_workers_key_bloc_in_nd_senate_race_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/05/new_oil_workers_key_bloc_in_nd_senate_race_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 13:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heidi Heitkamp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Berg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://http://www.salon.com/2012/11/04/new_oil_workers_key_bloc_in_nd_senate_race_2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Heidi Heitkamp and Rick Berg are fighting for the votes of North Dakota's energy workers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MANNING, N.D. (AP) — Shirley Meyer grew up on a ranch north of Dickinson, N.D., and has represented her rural district in the state House for a decade. But when she knocks on doors in her re-election campaign, she sometimes feels like a stranger in her own home.</p><p>"I was just shocked at how many new people there were," Meyer said during a recent campaign swing through a south Dickinson mobile home park. "I didn't see one North Dakota (license) plate."</p><p>The oil boom that has transformed North Dakota's economy and reshaped the rolling prairie landscape has also added an element of mystery to next week's election by adding thousands of potential new voters to the region's tiny electorate. And the political suspense is tied to the national question of which party controls the Senate in January.</p><p>North Dakota's contest is one of several states with Senate contests that have remained tied for months, with no signs of clarifying before Tuesday's election. A handful of them, such as Montana's Senate race one state west, may not even be resolved then.</p><p>Republicans are still looking to gain four seats they need to win the Senate majority if President Barack Obama wins reelection, three if GOP presidential hopeful Mitt Romney prevails.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/05/new_oil_workers_key_bloc_in_nd_senate_race_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/05/new_oil_workers_key_bloc_in_nd_senate_race_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
