<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > NPR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/npr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 06:12:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Super PACS hit &#8220;Sesame Street&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/18/super_pacs_hit_sesame_street/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/18/super_pacs_hit_sesame_street/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizens United]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PBS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12884121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The recent court ruling to allow political ads on PBS and NPR reflects the same flawed "logic" as Citizens United]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of weeks ago, <a href="http://billmoyers.com/2012/03/29/let%E2%80%99s-stop-big-media%E2%80%99s-bad-behavior/">we wrote about</a> how the media giants who own your local commercial television and radio stations have been striking like startled rattlesnakes at an FCC proposal that would shed a light on who’s buying our elections. The proposed new rule would make it easier to find out who’s bankrolling political attack ads by posting the information online.</p><p>The stations already have the data and are required by law to make it public to anyone who asks. But you can get only it by going to the station and asking for the actual paper documents – what’s known as “the public file.” Stations don’t want to put it online because — you guessed it — that would make it too easy for you to find out who’s putting up the cash for all those ads polluting your hometown airwaves.</p><p>If approved, the new rule would require the ABC, CBS, NBC and Fox affiliates in the top 50 markets to make their files on political advertising available online immediately. Other stations would have a two-year grace period.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/18/super_pacs_hit_sesame_street/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/18/super_pacs_hit_sesame_street/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The creepy condescension of Caitlin Flanagan</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/19/the_creepy_condescension_of_caitlin_flanagan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/19/the_creepy_condescension_of_caitlin_flanagan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 01:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caitlin Flanagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12192011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Salon writer thought it'd be possible to have a real discussion with the controversial writer. Her mistake!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no way to deny that on NPR today, author Caitlin Flanagan tried to lecture me on how I might have had a "better" adolescence. (There is <a href="http://onpoint.wbur.org/2012/01/18/caitlin-flanagan">proof</a> on the Internet, so I know I didn't hallucinate it.) Specifically, she tried to use me as an example of the perils of having the Internet in your room as an adolescent, because I didn't happen to meet a great guy to date in high school. The remedy? More princess movies.</p><p>Many people, including my actual parents, think I turned out pretty OK. And Flanagan, whose book "Girl Land" I <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/13/girl_uninterrupted/">reviewed</a> here, usually restricts her professional vocation of annoying feminists to print. So what was I doing defending my very existence on the radio?</p><p>"Do you know about Quakers? They try to find the good in everyone, and I felt you tried to do that in Flanagan's book," the producer at NPR's "On Point" told me, as he tried to convince me to take part in the on-air discussion. (If you read my review, you'll see this says more about the laceration Flanagan received elsewhere than any unusual empathy on my part.) I told him I was reluctant to engage in something that could turn into a catfight, but was persuaded that the thoughtful tone of the show and its host would prevail. Ultimately, too, I didn't want to shy away from a fight that I thought was important.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/19/the_creepy_condescension_of_caitlin_flanagan/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/19/the_creepy_condescension_of_caitlin_flanagan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>74</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Have Wilco and Radiohead become the new adult contemporary?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/27/have_wilco_and_radiohead_become_the_new_adult_contemporary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/27/have_wilco_and_radiohead_become_the_new_adult_contemporary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 16:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10149935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A New York magazine essay dismisses alt-rock vets as NPR Muzak -- and misunderstands both rebellion and growth]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a worse insult in rock music than “adult contemporary”? And is there anything worse for a fan than hearing it applied to a favorite band? For many listeners, <a href="http://nymag.com/arts/popmusic/features/wilco-feist-2011-10/">Nitsuh Abebe’s recent essay</a> in<em></em> New York magazine will be a provocation. The esteemed critic (and a Pitchfork colleague) appends the sleepy "adult contemporary" label to several indie-rock darlings, including Wilco, Feist, Stephen Malkmus, Neko Case -- and even Radiohead, all of which Abebe essentially lumps together and calls "NPR Muzak." “If there is a consensus about what counts as respectable, adult music in 2011,” he writes, “then these acts are surely a part of it: While more people consider pop music inherently silly than enjoy it, few assaults are leveled at the seriousness or artistic value of this stuff. It’s tasteful and subtle and brings a few newish ideas to the middle of the road; it adheres to a classic sense of what rock and American music are, but approaches it from artful enough directions to not seem entirely fusty.” This is not high praise. “The main criticism you hear about this kind of record — even outweighing references to Starbucks and/or the bourgeoisie — is that it is just too dull to even bother producing any more complex indictment of it.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/27/have_wilco_and_radiohead_become_the_new_adult_contemporary/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/27/have_wilco_and_radiohead_become_the_new_adult_contemporary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NPR celebrates crazy forum troll&#8217;s decision to practice unlicensed medicine in Libya</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/26/npr_celebrates_crazy_forum_trolls_decision_to_practice_unlicensed_medicine_in_libya/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/26/npr_celebrates_crazy_forum_trolls_decision_to_practice_unlicensed_medicine_in_libya/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mental Illness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10145329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A young man with a history of paranoid writings and no combat or medical experience gets an uncritical interview]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NPR's "Morning Edition" <a href="http://www.npr.org/2011/10/24/141646227/u-s-aid-worker-took-up-arms-with-libyas-rebels?plckFindCommentKey=CommentKey:b97a977e-9ea4-4083-a694-f76395bf1b58#commentBlock">profiles Kevin Dawes</a>, a brave young American who went to Libya as a medical aid worker last summer, but who ended up taking up arms against pro-Gadhafi forces. It's an inspiring tale of one man's courage, and also one man's possible mental illness. Because as numerous NPR commenters have pointed out, Dawes isn't a "medical aid worker," he's an unbalanced Internet forum troll who taught himself rudimentary medicine on YouTube.</p><p>Michael Woodward <a href="http://www.npr.org/2011/10/24/141646227/u-s-aid-worker-took-up-arms-with-libyas-rebels?plckFindCommentKey=CommentKey:b97a977e-9ea4-4083-a694-f76395bf1b58#commentBlock">comments, below the story</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Kevin Dawes was not a "medical aide worker" he is a self styled medic who taught himself the "skills" through youtube. He has no firearms training and is suffering severely from delusional and paranoid behavior. He is a danger to himself and others. In other stories about him, it is said even that battle hardened rebels are afraid of him and think he is crazy. This story is not researched and needs to be fact checked. I am sure that if you do search for some of his old screen names (try Caro)you will find some of his postings. Also, check out his blog and youtube channel- you will find he is not what this article portrays him to be.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/26/npr_celebrates_crazy_forum_trolls_decision_to_practice_unlicensed_medicine_in_libya/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/26/npr_celebrates_crazy_forum_trolls_decision_to_practice_unlicensed_medicine_in_libya/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fired NPR host sees &#8220;McCarthyism&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/20/fired_npr_host_sees_mccarthyism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/20/fired_npr_host_sees_mccarthyism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 18:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10130699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OWS supporter Lisa Simeone says she was dismissed after right-wing attacks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UPDATED BELOW<br />
Lisa Simeone, host of two cultural programs on National Public Radio, was fired from one of her positions last night for her leading role in the Freedom Plaza occupation in Washington, D.C.  The proximate cause was a series of blogs posts in the Daily Caller <a href="http://dailycaller.com/2011/10/19/npr-in-conversations-on-how-to-handle-ethics-violation/">asserting</a> that she had violated NPR's code of ethics, an allegation which Simeone denies.</p><p>"It overblown. Everyone's overreacting," Simeone told Salon in a phone interview. "It's like McCarthyism."</p><p>Simeone, a former weekend host of NPR's "All Things Considered" show, had not worked directly for the network since 2002. As a freelancer contracting with WDAV, a music and arts station in Davidson, N.C., she hosts NPR's "World of Opera" program.  <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/thisisnpr/2011/10/19/141527202/clarification-regarding-lisa-simeone">NPR</a> and <a href="http://blogs.wdav.org/2011/10/20/wdav-npr-world-of-opera/">WDAV</a> released statements today saying they are <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/thisisnpr/2011/10/19/141527202/clarification-regarding-lisa-simeone">"in conversation"</a> about Simeone's future.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/20/fired_npr_host_sees_mccarthyism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/20/fired_npr_host_sees_mccarthyism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>107</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Juan Williams, Fox employee, calls NPR &#8220;white&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/21/juan_williams_npr/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/21/juan_williams_npr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 19:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Juan Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/07/21/juan_williams_npr</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The professional "political correctness" victim's new workplace throws much more diverse parties, apparently]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boy, was getting fired from NPR the best thing that ever happened to mediocre commentator Juan Williams. The entire book he wrote on the subject of getting fired from NPR, "Milking It: The Juan Williams Story" (sorry, I meant "Muzzled: The Assault on Honest Debate") is out next week, and <a href="http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=08222446-F5B6-4BB1-80B7-A8EE28DD01CF">various anti-NPR excerpts are now up at Politico.</a> Juan Williams, who now works for Fox, where he is a professional "victim of the liberal media," says NPR is a "very elitist" and "white institution."</p><p>Juan Williams, again, works for Fox News. The closest Fox News gets to a regular minority presence is brunettes. (And Geraldo, I guess.) It's the channel of aggrieved white people who think they don't count as "elites" because they don't ... listen to NPR.</p><blockquote>
<p>"NPR editors and journalists found themselves caught in a game of trying to please a leadership team who did not want to hear stories on the air about conservatives, the poor, or anyone who didn&#8217;t&#8217; fit their profitable design of NPR as the official voice of college-educated, white, liberal-leaning, upper-income America," he writes.</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/21/juan_williams_npr/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/21/juan_williams_npr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>99</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Influencing Machine&#8221;: How the media works</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/22/influencing_machine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/22/influencing_machine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2011 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comic Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What to Read]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/laura_miller/2011/05/22/influencing_machine</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A frisky comic-book primer from the co-host of "On the Media" tackles objectivity, bias and the lizard brain]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every week, the Peabody Award-winning public radio program "On the Media" takes an essential but maddeningly immaterial subject -- how journalism, entertainment, advertising and other communications work -- and makes it graspable, urgent and wryly amusing. Much of the credit for this remarkable transubstantiation goes to longtime producer and co-host Brooke Gladstone, who consistently strikes the right balance between knowingness and idealism. She's all too aware of how the media really functions, but she never loses sight what the public wishes and imagines it to be.</p><p>Because there's such a gap between our dream (or nightmare) of the media and the reality, this gig requires a highly developed sense of irony. Say you're doing a story (as Gladstone did last fall) about the fact that the press will come down harder on a politician who lies about himself than on a candidate who lies about his opponent, and that it's much easier to get away with misrepresenting policy than with fibbing about personal matters. As a result, slandering your opponent's position on healthcare reform causes less of a fuss than claiming you dodged sniper fire on a diplomatic mission to Bosnia when you didn't.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/22/influencing_machine/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/22/influencing_machine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minnesota Republican hates Neil Gaiman for some reason</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/05/gaiman_minnesota_republican/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/05/gaiman_minnesota_republican/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neil Gaiman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/05/05/gaiman_minnesota_republican</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Beloved fantasy author called "pencil-necked weasel" by state House majority leader]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Minnesota does this very nice thing where 3/8 of one percent of the state&#8217;s sales tax goes to what is known as the Legacy Fund, which is primarily dedicated to clean air and land and water and parks and nature, but which also spends a bit of money preserving the state's "arts and cultural heritage," because Minnesotans enjoy the arts, and culture, and there is, in that state, a long bipartisan history of supporting those nice things, as a sort of public good. This very nice thing is in the Minnesota constitution, because <a href="http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/news/features/amendment.html">the people voted for it.</a></p><p>The newly elected Republicans who recently took control of both of Minnesota's legislative houses, though, are residents of Tea Party America, and in Tea Party America the government has no business spending money on anything besides arming militias, to shoot abortion providers. <a href="http://www.startribune.com/politics/statelocal/121223134.html">Take it away, House Majority Leader Matt Dean:</a></p><blockquote>
<p>Dean also singled out a $45,000 payment of Legacy money that was made last year to science fiction writer Neil Gaiman for a four-hour speaking appearance. <strong>Dean said that Gaiman, "who I hate," was a "pencil-necked little weasel who stole $45,000 from the state of Minnesota."</strong></p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/05/gaiman_minnesota_republican/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/05/gaiman_minnesota_republican/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>75</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What would public broadcasting do with $178 billion?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/04/npr_budget/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/04/npr_budget/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 16:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/04/04/npr_budget</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Americans are convinced 5 percent of the federal budget goes to NPR and PBS. Tote bags for everybody!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently Americans want to defund the Corporation for Public Broadcasting because they think 5 percent of the federal budget goes to NPR and PBS. That was the median guess in a CNN poll released Friday. <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/04/poll-americans-wrongly-estimate-178-billion-in-fed-budget-goes-to-public-broadcasting.php">If that were true, Talking Points Memo noted,</a> that would mean the CPB would receive $178 billion a year from the government. (And that's not even counting what they get from Archer Daniels Midland and viewers like you.)</p><p>BBC, the largest broadcaster in the world, <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/annualreport/exec/financial/consolidated.shtml">takes in $7.5 billion in income a year.</a> If Americans were right, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting would have a bigger budget than every military on Earth besides our own. NPR would beat China in an arms race.</p><p>What would the Corporation for Public Broadcasting even <em>do</em> with that kind of money, besides continue to have a liberal bias and support the establishment of sharia law? We have some guesses:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/04/npr_budget/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/04/npr_budget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>117</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What the right means when it calls NPR &#8220;liberal&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/25/moyers_winship_npr/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/25/moyers_winship_npr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 15:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/03/25/moyers_winship_npr</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bill Moyers and Michael Winship debunk the claim that NPR is the left-wing opposite of the right-wing media machine]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like Jake LaMotta and his brother Joey in the bloody boxing classic "Raging Bull," we are gluttons for punishment. So here we are again, third week in a row, defending NPR against the bare-knuckled assault of its critics.</p><p>Our earlier pieces on the funding threat to NPR have generated plenty of punches, both pro and con. And although most of the comments were welcome, and encouraged further thinking about the value of public media in a democratic society, a few reminded us of the words of the poet and scholar James Merrick: "So high at last the contest rose/From words they almost came to blows!"</p><p>Nonetheless, reading those comments and criticisms made us realize there are a couple of points that these two wizened veterans of public broadcasting -- with the multiple tote bags and coffee mugs to prove it -- would like to clarify.</p><p>For one, when we described the right-wing media machine as NPR&#8217;s "long-time nemesis," it was not to suggest that somehow public radio is its left-wing opposite. When it comes to covering and analyzing the news, the reverse of right isn't left; it's independent reporting that toes neither party nor ideological line. We&#8217;ve heard no NPR reporter -- not a one -- advocating on the air for more government spending (or less), for the right of abortion (or against it), for or against gay marriage, or for or against either political party, especially compared to what we hear from Fox News and talk radio on all of these issues and more.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/25/moyers_winship_npr/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/25/moyers_winship_npr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>203</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House votes to cut off federal funds for NPR</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/17/congress_votes_to_defund_npr/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/17/congress_votes_to_defund_npr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 21:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/03/17/congress_votes_to_defund_npr</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Falling along party lines, the bill will now go to the Senate where it is expected to be defeated]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The House on Thursday voted to end federal funding to National Public Radio. Republican supporters said it made good fiscal sense, and Democratic opponents called it an ideological attack that would deprive local stations of access to programs such as "Car Talk" and "All Things Considered."</p><p>The bill, passed 228-192 along mainly partisan lines, would bar federal funding of NPR and prohibit local public stations from using federal money to pay NPR dues and buy its programs. The prospects of support in the Democratic-controlled Senate are slim. Seven Republicans broke ranks to vote against the bill.</p><p>"It is time for American citizens to stop funding an organization that can stand on its own feet," said Rep. Doug Lamborn, R-Colo., the sponsor. He said it was not a question of content -- which many conservatives say has a liberal bias -- but whether taxpayer dollars should go to nonessential services. "As a country we no longer have this luxury."</p><p>Other Republicans also denied that the measure was a vendetta against NPR, although the organization left itself open to conservative attacks last week when an executive, talking to conservative activists posing as members of a fake Muslim group, was caught on camera deriding the tea party movement and saying the NPR would be better off without federal funding. Both the executive and the president of NPR resigned after the incident.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/17/congress_votes_to_defund_npr/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/17/congress_votes_to_defund_npr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Garrison Keillor says retirement looms in 2013</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/17/garrison_keillor_announces_retirement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/17/garrison_keillor_announces_retirement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 12:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Garrison Keillor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/03/17/garrison_keillor_announces_retirement</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The legendary host and creator of "A Prairie Home Companion" is looking for his replacement]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Garrison Keillor plans to keep spinning tales of Lake Wobegon's Norwegian bachelor farmers for at least a couple more years, but the host and creator of public radio's "A Prairie Home Companion" is dropping more hints that his retirement may be on the horizon.</p><p>In an interview posted Wednesday on the AARP Bulletin's website, the 68-year-old Keillor said he plans to retire in the spring of 2013. But Keillor said he first has to find his replacement.</p><p>"I'm pushing forward, and also I'm in denial. It's an interesting time of life," Keillor told the publication.</p><p>Keillor told The Associated Press in a follow-up e-mail Wednesday that he'll be 70 in the spring of 2013, "and that seems like a nice round number."</p><p>"The reason to retire is to try to avoid embarrassment; you ought to do it before people are dropping big hints. You want to be the first to come up with the idea. You don't want to wait until you trip and fall off the stage," Keillor told the AP.</p><p>For the first time this season, "A Prairie Home Companion" had a guest host on Jan. 15, when singer and fiddler Sara Watkins of the band Nickel Creek hosted the show from St. Paul's Fitzgerald Theater, with Keillor appearing as a featured guest. Keillor said at the time that he had never gotten to see the show himself and wanted "to stand in the back of the hall and watch for a few minutes."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/17/garrison_keillor_announces_retirement/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/17/garrison_keillor_announces_retirement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glenn Beck versus James O&#8217;Keefe (and Andrew Breitbart)</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/15/beck_breitbart_okeefe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/15/beck_breitbart_okeefe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 19:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Breitbart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James O'Keefe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/03/15/beck_breitbart_okeefe</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The right's biggest nut starts turning on the movement's bigger media stars]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.kansascity.com/2011/03/15/2727002/glenn-becks-youth-problem.html">Increasingly unpopular</a> television clown and radio revivalist Glenn Beck confused folks on the left and right recently when his "news" website the Blaze published <a href="http://www.theblaze.com/stories/does-raw-video-of-npr-expose-reveal-questionable-editing-tactics/">a thorough and fair debunking</a> of the recent NPR "sting" video produced by youthful video prankster and unprincipled conservative smear artist James O'Keefe.</p><p>The Blaze compared the edited and ready-for-air video with the lengthy unedited raw video of the NPR executives talking with the pretend Muslims attempting to goad them into saying outrageous things. The analysis found numerous shady and misleading edits and elisions. The report all but absolved former NPR fundraiser Ron Schiller of saying anything all that offensive to conservative Americans. The Blaze even reveals that the "raw" video was altered and censored for reasons unknown.</p><p>The Blaze's Scott Baker concludes, "even if you are of the opinion, as I am, that undercover reporting is acceptable and ethical in very defined situations, it is another thing to approve of editing tactics that seem designed to intentionally lie or mislead about the material being presented."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/15/beck_breitbart_okeefe/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/15/beck_breitbart_okeefe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In defense of NPR</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/10/bill_moyers_npr/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/10/bill_moyers_npr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 22:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/03/10/bill_moyers_npr</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bill Moyers and Michael Winship on the right's latest assault on public broadcasting]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on now: Let&#8217;s take a breath and put this NPR fracas into perspective.</p><p>Just as public radio struggles against yet another assault from its long-time nemesis -- the right-wing machine that would thrill if our sole sources of information were Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, and ads paid for by the Koch Brothers -- it walks into a trap perpetrated by one of the sleaziest operatives ever to climb out of a sewer.</p><p>First, in the interest of full disclosure: While not presently committing journalism on public television, the two of us have been colleagues on PBS for almost 40 years (although never for NPR). We&#8217;ve lived through every one of the fierce and often unscrupulous efforts by the right to shut down both public television and radio. Our work has sometimes been the explicit bull's eye on the dartboard, as conservative ideologues sought to extinguish the independent reporting and analysis they find so threatening to their phobic worldview.</p><p>We have come to believe, as so many others have, that only the creation of a substantial trust fund for public media will free it from the whims and biases of the politicians, including Democratic politicians (yes, after one of our documentaries tracking President Clinton's scandalous fund-raising in the mid-'90s, the knives were sharpened on the other side of the aisle).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/10/bill_moyers_npr/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/10/bill_moyers_npr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>150</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NPR general counsel serving as interim CEO</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/10/npr_tea_party_criticism_lawyer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/10/npr_tea_party_criticism_lawyer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James O'Keefe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/03/10/npr_tea_party_criticism_lawyer</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With a hunt for a new chief underway, NPR looks to its top lawyer to keep things under control]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) -- NPR will forge ahead in the fight for federal money despite six months of bad PR. NPR's top lawyer is serving as interim president and CEO while the board of directors searches for a replacement for Vivian Schiller.</p><p>NPR general counsel Joyce Slocum is Schiller's interim replacement. Board chairman Dave Edwards said Wednesday that the board has "absolute confidence" in Slocum.</p><p>The board is establishing a transition committee to search for a new CEO. Edwards says the board will be deliberate and there's no timetable for a decision.</p><p>Schiller resigned as NPR's CEO Wednesday to limit the damage from hidden camera footage of a fellow executive deriding the tea party movement as "seriously racist." Conservatives called the video proof that the network is biased and undeserving of federal funds.</p><p>From the news organization's perspective, the timing was exceptionally bad. The battle for funds will be the toughest yet, with Republicans in the new House majority looking to cut all federal funding of public radio and television.</p><p>It's the latest blunder for the news organization, which publicly admitted fumbling the firing of analyst Juan Williams over comments he made about Muslims. Then NPR had to apologize to the family of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords when it falsely reported the congresswoman's death.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/10/npr_tea_party_criticism_lawyer/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/10/npr_tea_party_criticism_lawyer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jon Stewart on Obama, Gitmo and NPR</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/10/jon_stewart_obama_gitmo_npr/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/10/jon_stewart_obama_gitmo_npr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morning Clip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily Show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/03/10/jon_stewart_obama_gitmo_npr</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a new segment called MoveOn.Aww, the Daily Show host looks at the battles liberals are losing]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What's funnier than Jon Stewart making fun at conservatives on the Daily Show? Jon Stewart <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-march-9-2011/moveon-aww---trials-resume-for-guantanamo-detainees?xrs=share_copy">making fun of liberals</a> on the Daily Show.</p><p>In an effort to make sense of yesterday's announcement that Guantanamo trials would resume, Stewart questions Obama's ability to keep his promises versus his tendency to cave to political pressure -- or simply to be hypocritical. After decrying the practice of holding prisoners without a trial due to lack of evidence, Obama announced that some prisoners might need to be kept at Guantanamo indefinity. His reason? There's a lack of evidence needed to take the cases to trial.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/10/jon_stewart_obama_gitmo_npr/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/10/jon_stewart_obama_gitmo_npr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NPR caves to O&#8217;Keefe &#8212; and we all lose</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/09/npr_capitulates_to_okeefe_open2011/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/09/npr_capitulates_to_okeefe_open2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 19:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James O'Keefe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/03/09/npr_capitulates_to_okeefe_open2011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By having its CEO resign after the "sting" operation, the organization is handing the public discourse to liars]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is much more to say, but I'm angry, and I want to say this quickly: We're all on notice now. Keep your eyes open and your ears cocked. Public life is becoming a maze of entrapments, and the press is enabling the deceit.</p><p>Yesterday James O'Keefe, the conservative trickster who has previously targeted ACORN and other organizations with fraudulent schemes aimed at exposing what he sees as liberal bias and malfeasance, unveiled his latest act: his confederates <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-npr-conservative-sting-20110308,0,7411475.story">impersonated Muslim donors</a> and recorded a meeting with an NPR fundraiser, Ron Schiller. Schiller said some impolitic things, some of which were true, others of which were overstatements, none of which was that different from what you can hear in any bar and on any blog. (Unless you believe nobody has ever charged that there are racists in the ranks of the Tea Party, or that anyone has ever suggested NPR might be better off without the federal funding that conservatives are constantly threatening to cut.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/09/npr_capitulates_to_okeefe_open2011/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/09/npr_capitulates_to_okeefe_open2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>80</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Juan Williams thrilled as man is fired from NPR for having wrong opinions</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/09/npr_schiller_williams/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/09/npr_schiller_williams/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James O'Keefe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Juan Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/03/09/npr_schiller_williams</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former public radio commentator gloats as Ron Schiller's career ends due to right-wing political correctness]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conservative activist James O'Keefe tricked NPR fundraiser Ron Schiller into saying impolitic things into a camera, which, predictably, caused some outrage. Schiller was fired, even though he'd already given notice that he was leaving for a new job. NPR was decried as racist and anti-conservative, even though Schiller had nothing to do with the editorial side of the corporation and explicitly said that he was airing his personal views and not the views of NPR. Like all O'Keefe sting videos, the released tapes were <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/npr-james-okeefe-vide-tea-party-racist-2011-3">misleadingly edited</a> and claims about the contents of the tapes were exaggerated with the knowledge that people ideologically predisposed to believe the worst about the sting subject wouldn't bother to check the transcripts. And Schiller repeatedly refused to take the fake check from the fake Muslims. (I think O'Keefe could "release" a Rick Astley video with a headline claiming he "caught" everyone at the New York Times saying they hate white people and it'd lead to Bill Keller's resignation.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/09/npr_schiller_williams/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/09/npr_schiller_williams/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>168</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NPR CEO Vivian Schiller resigns over hidden camera video</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/09/us_npr_tea_party_criticism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/09/us_npr_tea_party_criticism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 13:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James O'Keefe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/03/09/us_npr_tea_party_criticism</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vivian Schiller steps down after footage showed another executive calling Tea Partiers racist]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A hidden-camera video of an NPR executive calling the tea party racist and saying the network would be better off without federal money has led to the <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2011/03/09/134388981/npr-ceo-vivian-schiller-resigns">resignation</a> of NPR President and CEO Vivian Schiller.</p><p>National Public Radio said in a statement that it was "appalled" by the comments from Ron Schiller, the president of NPR's fundraising arm and a senior vice president for development.</p><p>The video was posted Tuesday by James O'Keefe, the same activist whose undercover videos have targeted other groups opposed by conservatives, like the community organizing group ACORN and Planned Parenthood.</p><p>Schiller had planned to resign from his position before the video was shot and was expected to depart in May. In a statement Tuesday night, however, he said his resignation would be effective immediately.</p><p>The video drew swift reaction from Republicans in Congress, who are renewing efforts to cut funding to public broadcasters. NPR and PBS have long been targets of conservatives who claim their programming has a left-wing bias. Similar efforts in the 1990s and 2005 were not successful, although public broadcasters take the threat seriously.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/09/us_npr_tea_party_criticism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/09/us_npr_tea_party_criticism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>126</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NPR sting also nets &#8230; Pamela Geller?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/08/okeefe_npr_pamela_geller/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/08/okeefe_npr_pamela_geller/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 20:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James O'Keefe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/03/08/okeefe_npr_pamela_geller</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Several notoriously anti-Muslim bloggers were taken in by a fake radical Islamic website set up by James O'Keefe]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>(</strong><strong>UPDATED)</strong> Conservative activist James O'Keefe today <a href="http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/03/08/npr-executive-%20%20caught-calling-tea-partiers-racist/">released</a> a sting video showing an NPR fundraising official saying impolitic things to a couple of (fake) potential Muslim donors. A key part of the sting was the creation of a hoax website for the fake group the donors represented, the Muslim Education Action Center (MEAC).</p><p>The website for MEAC read a lot like a right-wing cartoon version of radical Islam -- so perhaps it's not surprising that a few notoriously anti-Muslim bloggers were apparently taken in by the hoax website. (It's not clear that the&#160;NPR&#160;officials ever saw the site.)</p><p>Pamela Geller, the blogger who deserves much of the <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/08/16/ground_zero_mosque_origins">credit</a> for starting the "ground zero mosque" controversy, seized on MEAC's website way back in January, pointing to passages on the website that promoted the bogeyman of sharia:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/08/okeefe_npr_pamela_geller/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/08/okeefe_npr_pamela_geller/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

