<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > NPR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/npr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:22:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>James Salter: &#8220;It&#8217;s hard to think of any other women on the spur of the moment here&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/james_salter_its_hard_to_think_of_any_other_women_on_the_spur_of_the_moment_here/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/james_salter_its_hard_to_think_of_any_other_women_on_the_spur_of_the_moment_here/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 11:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Salter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kim Kardashian]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13296942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Asked about how his characters refer to women, he names a Clinton and a Kardashian, then can't remember any others]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At 87, James Salter is having perhaps the best year of his career. His first novel in three decades, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/1400043131//?tag=saloncom08-20">"All That Is,"</a> has brought rave reviews and even a <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2013/04/15/130415fa_fact_paumgarten">New Yorker profile.</a> It's heady, late-life success for a novelist mostly revered as a writer's writer for books like "Light Years" and "A Sport and a Pastime."</p><p>But this weekend on NPR's "All Things Considered," the latest stop on his celebratory media tour, Salter was asked by host Arun Rath about his women characters -- and he gave what might be as bizarre an answer as has any male writer these days, suddenly faced with direct questions about literature and gender that they might not have been asked before.</p><p><a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/transcript/transcript.php?storyId=182249161">Here's the transcript:</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/james_salter_its_hard_to_think_of_any_other_women_on_the_spur_of_the_moment_here/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/james_salter_its_hard_to_think_of_any_other_women_on_the_spur_of_the_moment_here/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the small nonprofit in big trouble?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/is_the_small_nonprofit_organization_in_big_trouble_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/is_the_small_nonprofit_organization_in_big_trouble_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LA Review of Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nonprofits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[essays]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13268330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In "With Charity for All," former NPR president Ken Stern sheds light on the dark side of NPOs]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lareviewofbooks.org/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/LARB_LOGO_RED_LIGHT1.jpg" alt="Los Angeles Review of Books" /></a>IN A RECENT <em>Los Angeles Times</em> article about Los Angeles’ Museum of Contemporary Art’s (MOCA) efforts to raise $100 million, a fundraising consultant said, “People like to give to excellence. It’s excellence, not need that generates big gifts.”</p><p>If that were really the case, author Ken Stern argues, then D.A.R.E., the darling drug abuse education program started by former Los Angeles Police chief Daryl Gates and now in more than 75 percent of the school districts of this country, wouldn’t raise a dime, most after-school programs would be bankrupt, and the next disaster the Red Cross should be attending to would be in its own executive offices.</p><p>The ability to survive, even thrive, with programs that have been proven not to work is just one of the many oddities <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/038553471X/?tag=saloncom08-20">With Charity for All</a></em> documents in the topsy-turvy, misunderstood, and mostly ignored world of nonprofits.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/is_the_small_nonprofit_organization_in_big_trouble_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/is_the_small_nonprofit_organization_in_big_trouble_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NPR to replace &#8220;Talk of the Nation&#8221; with Boston program “Here and Now”</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/npr_to_replace_talk_of_the_nation_with_boston_program_%e2%80%9chere_and_now%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/npr_to_replace_talk_of_the_nation_with_boston_program_%e2%80%9chere_and_now%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 17:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talk of the nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[here and now]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13255778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The radio network aims to deliver more breaking news during the week]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After a two-decade run, NPR is ending its call-in show "Talk of the Nation," switching instead to an NPR-local news hybrid program that delivers a "a magazine-style news show," according to the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/30/business/media/npr-to-end-talk-of-the-nation.html?smid=tw-share&amp;_r=2&amp;">New York Times</a>. The new radio program is an expansion of Boston University-produced "Here and Now," which has been broadcast nationally since 2001.</p><p>From the New York Times:</p><blockquote><p>NPR will partner with [Boston University station] WBUR to turn the one-hour “Here and Now” into a two-hour show, with contributions from NPR News staff and other local stations. A co-host, Jeremy Hobson, will join the current host of the program, Robin Young.</p> <p>The partnership marks the first time that NPR, a national supplier of newscasts and shows, has linked arms with a station in this way. 'Together, we’re addressing both what the audience is looking for and what member stations have been looking for,' said Kinsey Wilson, the chief content officer for NPR.</p></blockquote><p>NPR's “Here and Now” will air on weekdays, beginning July 1, from 2 to 4 p.m. Eastern time.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/npr_to_replace_talk_of_the_nation_with_boston_program_%e2%80%9chere_and_now%e2%80%9d/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/npr_to_replace_talk_of_the_nation_with_boston_program_%e2%80%9chere_and_now%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Southern California NPR bracket pits public-radio shows against one another</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/southern_california_npr_bracket_pits_public_radio_shows_against_one_another/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/southern_california_npr_bracket_pits_public_radio_shows_against_one_another/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 20:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kpcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brackets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terry gross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fresh air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ira Glass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[This American Life]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13252588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Talk of the Nation" beats "Tavis Smiley" in a contest pitting NPR's shows against one another ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, Vulture, Vanity Fair and Grantland may think they have the "<a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/get_ready_for_bracket_wars/">fake brackets</a>" game on lock, but there's a new player in town -- and it could send you a tote bag with your pledge.</p><p>A Southern California NPR affiliate, KPCC, has this month launched a bracket pitting NPR shows both national and local against one another. The <a href="http://www.scpr.org/news/2013/03/25/36526/poll-public-radio-bracket-madness-round-3-vote-for/">Elite Eight</a> in this tournament include "This American Life," "Fresh Air With Terry Gross" and "Radiolab," which surprisingly beat "Morning Edition" in the public vote. Local programming has gone the way of Harvard this year -- two shows focused on the Latino experience in particular, "Alt.Latino" and "Latino USA," fell in the first round. (So, too, did PRI's "The Tavis Smiley Show.")</p><p>"I was super concerned about this," said Mike Roe, a Web producer for KPCC. "I had this idea first and I didn't want to go with it. I was worried about the politics within it, within the whole public radio world." He decided to make all KPCC-produced shows No. 1 seeds, though as the brackets garnered national attention, they quickly fell.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/southern_california_npr_bracket_pits_public_radio_shows_against_one_another/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/southern_california_npr_bracket_pits_public_radio_shows_against_one_another/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sandra Day O&#8217;Connor&#8217;s very dry interview with Terry Gross</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/06/sandra_day_oconnors_very_dry_interview_with_terry_gross/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/06/sandra_day_oconnors_very_dry_interview_with_terry_gross/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 18:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terry gross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sandra day o'connor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13220673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The retired Supreme Court justice gave an informative, but oftentimes abrupt, interview with NPR]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, the first woman to serve on the Court, spoke with "Fresh Air's" Terry Gross yesterday about her reputation as a swing voter (a term O'Connor detests) on the politically divided court. Among O'Connor's swing decisions, she co-authored a decision supporting a woman's right to choose, re-affirming Roe v. Wade, and voted to end the recount in Bush v. Gore. But O'Connor, who served for nearly 25 years on the court, didn't elaborate on the decisions with Gross. Instead, she deflected:</p><p>On abortion:</p><blockquote><p>GROSS: In one of the decisions that you wrote about pertaining to abortion, you explain why you would not agree to overturn Roe v. Wade. And you wrote: The mother who carries a child to full term is subject to anxieties, to physical constraints, to a point that only she must bear. That these sacrifices have from the beginning of the human race been endured by woman with a pride that ennobles her in the eyes of others and gives to the infant a bond of love cannot alone be grounds for the state to insist she make the sacrifice. Her suffering is too intimate and personal for the state to insist upon its own vision of the woman's role, however dominant that vision has been in the course of our history and culture. The destiny of the woman must be shaped to a large extent on her own conception of her spiritual imperative and her place in society.</p> <p>Did being a woman and being a mother inform how you wrote that?</p> <p>O'CONNOR: Well, I'm sure it would have.</p> <p>GROSS: Can you elaborate on that?</p> <p>O'CONNOR: Well, no, just I'm female. I am a mother. I've gone through all of that. And I'm sure in something as sensitive as the issues that we were considering with abortion rulings and so forth, that my own personal background would've had some affect on my decisions. It couldn't help but have.</p> <p>GROSS: In Casey versus Planned Parenthood, which was a decision in Pennsylvania about a state's right to add restrictions on access to abortion, you had harsh words for Judge Alito. This was before he was a Supreme Court justice, but he had written part of the decision in Casey. In his decision he upheld a certain restriction, which was that a woman had to seek her husband's approval before getting an abortion. A wife had to seek her husband's approval. And in your decision in the Supreme Court overturning that aspect of the decision you called that view repugnant to our present understanding of marriage and to the nature of the rights secured by the Constitution. Women do not lose their constitutionally-protected liberty when they marry. Can you elaborate on that at all?</p> <p>O'CONNOR: No. I don't think I'll try.</p> <p>GROSS: OK.</p> <p>O'CONNOR: That's very sensitive and I did the best I could in that decision and I'll leave it there.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/06/sandra_day_oconnors_very_dry_interview_with_terry_gross/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/06/sandra_day_oconnors_very_dry_interview_with_terry_gross/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Four ways banks have ruined higher education</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/04/four_ways_banks_have_ruined_colleges_and_universities/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/04/four_ways_banks_have_ruined_colleges_and_universities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 16:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[student loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13030429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Colleges and universities are padding their bottom lines -- and the American public is footing the bill]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a>  Like many others, I’m a passionate alumnus of my post-secondary institutions. I care deeply about preserving the rich culture of learning and community-building that fundamentally shaped my life. Yet it is becoming increasingly clear that drastic changes are being made to American college and university life -- changes that are fundamentally altering the ecology of higher education in this country and undercutting the very mission of the college experience as we know it.</p><p>A growing culture of reform has turned the campus quad away from preparing students for citizenship -- that combination of “intelligence plus character” the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King. Jr. once famously described. In its place, we now have campus environments that hold certain aspects of student life hostage to corporate interests, molding students into consumers at the same time the voices and opinions of the student body are increasingly silenced. As a result, higher education, often noted as the best insurance policy toward social mobility, is now no such thing (at least good insurance policies pay their claims).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/04/four_ways_banks_have_ruined_colleges_and_universities/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/04/four_ways_banks_have_ruined_colleges_and_universities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When I finally saw my blood</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/30/stay_at_home_dad_in_a_war_zone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/30/stay_at_home_dad_in_a_war_zone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2012 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Families]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beirut]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13024712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Kelly reports from Syria, I'm taking care of our child, pouring another glass of wine and wondering: Is this it?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'd lived in Beirut for nearly a year -- next to the mess in Syria, where more than 20,000 people had so far been killed; an hour or two from borders my wife crossed to find out why; and where, for a variety of reasons, I still had trouble explaining my own stake in all this -- when, in the kitchen the other night, I finally saw my own blood.</p><p>Before Beirut, we had lived in Turkey and Iraq, the latter of which was my wife Kelly's base. (She’s a correspondent for NPR.) Those weren't fun times, spending so many months apart. Among other problems, it was difficult to be a man, changing diapers, while my wife swash-buckled her way across Mesopotamia. With the mother of our daughter based in Baghdad, I learned how to excel at various domestic chores and also how to worry. What would happen if a mortar fell or if bad guys tested the glass on her armored truck? What would people think of a blonde woman traveling to Anbar Province? The Middle East, for my wife, was the big league. For me, it was a place to find a good doctor and maybe some daycare. Alone on a Friday night, I'd pour myself another glass and wonder: Was this it?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/30/stay_at_home_dad_in_a_war_zone/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/30/stay_at_home_dad_in_a_war_zone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who&#8217;s to blame for NPR&#8217;s super-white book list?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/10/whos_to_blame_for_nprs_super_white_book_list/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/10/whos_to_blame_for_nprs_super_white_book_list/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 21:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White people]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Readers and Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13007054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Critics attacked the the organization and its audience when a recent book poll skewed white]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NPR just wanted to ask its audience about their <a href="http://www.npr.org/2012/08/07/157795366/your-favorites-100-best-ever-teen-novels">favorite young adult fiction</a>. But this seemingly harmless gesture stirred up all sorts of controversy. Out of 100 books on the list, only three have non-white protagonists. Now people are angry, or at least <a href="http://madwomanintheforest.com/happy-sad-about-the-npr-top-100-ya-list/">politely clearing their throats</a>.</p><p>Here's the question: Who is to blame?<br /> <strong></strong></p><p><strong>Theory 1: The panel of experts is to blame</strong><br /> The panel of experts are suspiciously all white. NPR ombudsman Edward Schumacher-Matos wrote that “Much of the criticism was directed at the white panel of experts," but he added, "the censure is misplaced.”  Panel member Pamela Paul, features editor and children's book editor at the New York Times Book Review, confirms Schumacher-Matos’ claim via email, writing:</p><blockquote><p>Our role on the expert panel was simply to advise on how to make sure the readers' nominations fit the definition of "YA novel." Many of the readers' nominations were actually adult or middle-grade books, and we helped them weed out those titles. But I didn't make any judgment with regard to quality in determining the final list, which were all reader-generated.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/10/whos_to_blame_for_nprs_super_white_book_list/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/10/whos_to_blame_for_nprs_super_white_book_list/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Laura Miller: What to read this summer</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/18/laura_miller_what_to_read_this_summer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/18/laura_miller_what_to_read_this_summer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 14:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12940416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Listen to Salon's book critic and a panel of critics share their "compulsively readable" picks for summer reading]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Need a beach read? Salon's own Laura Miller stops by NPR's "Weekend Edition" to discuss some of her favorites this year. Listen in:</p><p><object width="400" height="386" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="src" value="http://www.npr.org/v2/?i=155042231&amp;m=155213217&amp;t=audio" /><param name="wmode" value="opaque" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="base" value="http://www.npr.org" /><embed width="400" height="386" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.npr.org/v2/?i=155042231&amp;m=155213217&amp;t=audio" wmode="opaque" allowfullscreen="true" base="http://www.npr.org" /></object></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/06/18/laura_miller_what_to_read_this_summer/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/18/laura_miller_what_to_read_this_summer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Super PACS hit &#8220;Sesame Street&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/18/super_pacs_hit_sesame_street/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/18/super_pacs_hit_sesame_street/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizens United]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12884121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The recent court ruling to allow political ads on PBS and NPR reflects the same flawed "logic" as Citizens United]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of weeks ago, <a href="http://billmoyers.com/2012/03/29/let%E2%80%99s-stop-big-media%E2%80%99s-bad-behavior/">we wrote about</a> how the media giants who own your local commercial television and radio stations have been striking like startled rattlesnakes at an FCC proposal that would shed a light on who’s buying our elections. The proposed new rule would make it easier to find out who’s bankrolling political attack ads by posting the information online.</p><p>The stations already have the data and are required by law to make it public to anyone who asks. But you can get only it by going to the station and asking for the actual paper documents – what’s known as “the public file.” Stations don’t want to put it online because — you guessed it — that would make it too easy for you to find out who’s putting up the cash for all those ads polluting your hometown airwaves.</p><p>If approved, the new rule would require the ABC, CBS, NBC and Fox affiliates in the top 50 markets to make their files on political advertising available online immediately. Other stations would have a two-year grace period.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/18/super_pacs_hit_sesame_street/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/18/super_pacs_hit_sesame_street/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The creepy condescension of Caitlin Flanagan</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/19/the_creepy_condescension_of_caitlin_flanagan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/19/the_creepy_condescension_of_caitlin_flanagan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 01:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caitlin Flanagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12192011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Salon writer thought it'd be possible to have a real discussion with the controversial writer. Her mistake!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no way to deny that on NPR today, author Caitlin Flanagan tried to lecture me on how I might have had a "better" adolescence. (There is <a href="http://onpoint.wbur.org/2012/01/18/caitlin-flanagan">proof</a> on the Internet, so I know I didn't hallucinate it.) Specifically, she tried to use me as an example of the perils of having the Internet in your room as an adolescent, because I didn't happen to meet a great guy to date in high school. The remedy? More princess movies.</p><p>Many people, including my actual parents, think I turned out pretty OK. And Flanagan, whose book "Girl Land" I <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/13/girl_uninterrupted/">reviewed</a> here, usually restricts her professional vocation of annoying feminists to print. So what was I doing defending my very existence on the radio?</p><p>"Do you know about Quakers? They try to find the good in everyone, and I felt you tried to do that in Flanagan's book," the producer at NPR's "On Point" told me, as he tried to convince me to take part in the on-air discussion. (If you read my review, you'll see this says more about the laceration Flanagan received elsewhere than any unusual empathy on my part.) I told him I was reluctant to engage in something that could turn into a catfight, but was persuaded that the thoughtful tone of the show and its host would prevail. Ultimately, too, I didn't want to shy away from a fight that I thought was important.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/19/the_creepy_condescension_of_caitlin_flanagan/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/19/the_creepy_condescension_of_caitlin_flanagan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>74</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Have Wilco and Radiohead become the new adult contemporary?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/27/have_wilco_and_radiohead_become_the_new_adult_contemporary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/27/have_wilco_and_radiohead_become_the_new_adult_contemporary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 16:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10149935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A New York magazine essay dismisses alt-rock vets as NPR Muzak -- and misunderstands both rebellion and growth]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a worse insult in rock music than “adult contemporary”? And is there anything worse for a fan than hearing it applied to a favorite band? For many listeners, <a href="http://nymag.com/arts/popmusic/features/wilco-feist-2011-10/">Nitsuh Abebe’s recent essay</a> in<em></em> New York magazine will be a provocation. The esteemed critic (and a Pitchfork colleague) appends the sleepy "adult contemporary" label to several indie-rock darlings, including Wilco, Feist, Stephen Malkmus, Neko Case -- and even Radiohead, all of which Abebe essentially lumps together and calls "NPR Muzak." “If there is a consensus about what counts as respectable, adult music in 2011,” he writes, “then these acts are surely a part of it: While more people consider pop music inherently silly than enjoy it, few assaults are leveled at the seriousness or artistic value of this stuff. It’s tasteful and subtle and brings a few newish ideas to the middle of the road; it adheres to a classic sense of what rock and American music are, but approaches it from artful enough directions to not seem entirely fusty.” This is not high praise. “The main criticism you hear about this kind of record — even outweighing references to Starbucks and/or the bourgeoisie — is that it is just too dull to even bother producing any more complex indictment of it.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/27/have_wilco_and_radiohead_become_the_new_adult_contemporary/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/27/have_wilco_and_radiohead_become_the_new_adult_contemporary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NPR celebrates crazy forum troll&#8217;s decision to practice unlicensed medicine in Libya</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/26/npr_celebrates_crazy_forum_trolls_decision_to_practice_unlicensed_medicine_in_libya/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/26/npr_celebrates_crazy_forum_trolls_decision_to_practice_unlicensed_medicine_in_libya/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mental Illness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10145329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A young man with a history of paranoid writings and no combat or medical experience gets an uncritical interview]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NPR's "Morning Edition" <a href="http://www.npr.org/2011/10/24/141646227/u-s-aid-worker-took-up-arms-with-libyas-rebels?plckFindCommentKey=CommentKey:b97a977e-9ea4-4083-a694-f76395bf1b58#commentBlock">profiles Kevin Dawes</a>, a brave young American who went to Libya as a medical aid worker last summer, but who ended up taking up arms against pro-Gadhafi forces. It's an inspiring tale of one man's courage, and also one man's possible mental illness. Because as numerous NPR commenters have pointed out, Dawes isn't a "medical aid worker," he's an unbalanced Internet forum troll who taught himself rudimentary medicine on YouTube.</p><p>Michael Woodward <a href="http://www.npr.org/2011/10/24/141646227/u-s-aid-worker-took-up-arms-with-libyas-rebels?plckFindCommentKey=CommentKey:b97a977e-9ea4-4083-a694-f76395bf1b58#commentBlock">comments, below the story</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Kevin Dawes was not a "medical aide worker" he is a self styled medic who taught himself the "skills" through youtube. He has no firearms training and is suffering severely from delusional and paranoid behavior. He is a danger to himself and others. In other stories about him, it is said even that battle hardened rebels are afraid of him and think he is crazy. This story is not researched and needs to be fact checked. I am sure that if you do search for some of his old screen names (try Caro)you will find some of his postings. Also, check out his blog and youtube channel- you will find he is not what this article portrays him to be.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/26/npr_celebrates_crazy_forum_trolls_decision_to_practice_unlicensed_medicine_in_libya/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/26/npr_celebrates_crazy_forum_trolls_decision_to_practice_unlicensed_medicine_in_libya/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fired NPR host sees &#8220;McCarthyism&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/20/fired_npr_host_sees_mccarthyism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/20/fired_npr_host_sees_mccarthyism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 18:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10130699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OWS supporter Lisa Simeone says she was dismissed after right-wing attacks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UPDATED BELOW<br /> Lisa Simeone, host of two cultural programs on National Public Radio, was fired from one of her positions last night for her leading role in the Freedom Plaza occupation in Washington, D.C.  The proximate cause was a series of blogs posts in the Daily Caller <a href="http://dailycaller.com/2011/10/19/npr-in-conversations-on-how-to-handle-ethics-violation/">asserting</a> that she had violated NPR's code of ethics, an allegation which Simeone denies.</p><p>"It overblown. Everyone's overreacting," Simeone told Salon in a phone interview. "It's like McCarthyism."</p><p>Simeone, a former weekend host of NPR's "All Things Considered" show, had not worked directly for the network since 2002. As a freelancer contracting with WDAV, a music and arts station in Davidson, N.C., she hosts NPR's "World of Opera" program.  <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/thisisnpr/2011/10/19/141527202/clarification-regarding-lisa-simeone">NPR</a> and <a href="http://blogs.wdav.org/2011/10/20/wdav-npr-world-of-opera/">WDAV</a> released statements today saying they are <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/thisisnpr/2011/10/19/141527202/clarification-regarding-lisa-simeone">"in conversation"</a> about Simeone's future.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/20/fired_npr_host_sees_mccarthyism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/20/fired_npr_host_sees_mccarthyism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>107</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Juan Williams, Fox employee, calls NPR &#8220;white&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/21/juan_williams_npr/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/21/juan_williams_npr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 19:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Juan Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/07/21/juan_williams_npr</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The professional "political correctness" victim's new workplace throws much more diverse parties, apparently]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boy, was getting fired from NPR the best thing that ever happened to mediocre commentator Juan Williams. The entire book he wrote on the subject of getting fired from NPR, "Milking It: The Juan Williams Story" (sorry, I meant "Muzzled: The Assault on Honest Debate") is out next week, and <a href="http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=08222446-F5B6-4BB1-80B7-A8EE28DD01CF">various anti-NPR excerpts are now up at Politico.</a> Juan Williams, who now works for Fox, where he is a professional "victim of the liberal media," says NPR is a "very elitist" and "white institution."</p><p>Juan Williams, again, works for Fox News. The closest Fox News gets to a regular minority presence is brunettes. (And Geraldo, I guess.) It's the channel of aggrieved white people who think they don't count as "elites" because they don't ... listen to NPR.</p><blockquote> <p>"NPR editors and journalists found themselves caught in a game of trying to please a leadership team who did not want to hear stories on the air about conservatives, the poor, or anyone who didn&#8217;t&#8217; fit their profitable design of NPR as the official voice of college-educated, white, liberal-leaning, upper-income America," he writes.</p> </blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/21/juan_williams_npr/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/21/juan_williams_npr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>99</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Influencing Machine&#8221;: How the media works</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/22/influencing_machine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/22/influencing_machine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2011 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What to Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comic Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/laura_miller/2011/05/22/influencing_machine</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A frisky comic-book primer from the co-host of "On the Media" tackles objectivity, bias and the lizard brain]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every week, the Peabody Award-winning public radio program "On the Media" takes an essential but maddeningly immaterial subject -- how journalism, entertainment, advertising and other communications work -- and makes it graspable, urgent and wryly amusing. Much of the credit for this remarkable transubstantiation goes to longtime producer and co-host Brooke Gladstone, who consistently strikes the right balance between knowingness and idealism. She's all too aware of how the media really functions, but she never loses sight what the public wishes and imagines it to be.</p><p>Because there's such a gap between our dream (or nightmare) of the media and the reality, this gig requires a highly developed sense of irony. Say you're doing a story (as Gladstone did last fall) about the fact that the press will come down harder on a politician who lies about himself than on a candidate who lies about his opponent, and that it's much easier to get away with misrepresenting policy than with fibbing about personal matters. As a result, slandering your opponent's position on healthcare reform causes less of a fuss than claiming you dodged sniper fire on a diplomatic mission to Bosnia when you didn't.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/22/influencing_machine/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/22/influencing_machine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minnesota Republican hates Neil Gaiman for some reason</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/05/gaiman_minnesota_republican/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/05/gaiman_minnesota_republican/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neil Gaiman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/05/05/gaiman_minnesota_republican</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Beloved fantasy author called "pencil-necked weasel" by state House majority leader]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Minnesota does this very nice thing where 3/8 of one percent of the state&#8217;s sales tax goes to what is known as the Legacy Fund, which is primarily dedicated to clean air and land and water and parks and nature, but which also spends a bit of money preserving the state's "arts and cultural heritage," because Minnesotans enjoy the arts, and culture, and there is, in that state, a long bipartisan history of supporting those nice things, as a sort of public good. This very nice thing is in the Minnesota constitution, because <a href="http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/news/features/amendment.html">the people voted for it.</a></p><p>The newly elected Republicans who recently took control of both of Minnesota's legislative houses, though, are residents of Tea Party America, and in Tea Party America the government has no business spending money on anything besides arming militias, to shoot abortion providers. <a href="http://www.startribune.com/politics/statelocal/121223134.html">Take it away, House Majority Leader Matt Dean:</a></p><blockquote> <p>Dean also singled out a $45,000 payment of Legacy money that was made last year to science fiction writer Neil Gaiman for a four-hour speaking appearance. <strong>Dean said that Gaiman, "who I hate," was a "pencil-necked little weasel who stole $45,000 from the state of Minnesota."</strong></p> </blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/05/gaiman_minnesota_republican/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/05/gaiman_minnesota_republican/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>75</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What would public broadcasting do with $178 billion?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/04/npr_budget/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/04/npr_budget/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 16:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/04/04/npr_budget</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Americans are convinced 5 percent of the federal budget goes to NPR and PBS. Tote bags for everybody!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently Americans want to defund the Corporation for Public Broadcasting because they think 5 percent of the federal budget goes to NPR and PBS. That was the median guess in a CNN poll released Friday. <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/04/poll-americans-wrongly-estimate-178-billion-in-fed-budget-goes-to-public-broadcasting.php">If that were true, Talking Points Memo noted,</a> that would mean the CPB would receive $178 billion a year from the government. (And that's not even counting what they get from Archer Daniels Midland and viewers like you.)</p><p>BBC, the largest broadcaster in the world, <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/annualreport/exec/financial/consolidated.shtml">takes in $7.5 billion in income a year.</a> If Americans were right, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting would have a bigger budget than every military on Earth besides our own. NPR would beat China in an arms race.</p><p>What would the Corporation for Public Broadcasting even <em>do</em> with that kind of money, besides continue to have a liberal bias and support the establishment of sharia law? We have some guesses:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/04/npr_budget/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/04/npr_budget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>117</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What the right means when it calls NPR &#8220;liberal&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/25/moyers_winship_npr/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/25/moyers_winship_npr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 15:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/03/25/moyers_winship_npr</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bill Moyers and Michael Winship debunk the claim that NPR is the left-wing opposite of the right-wing media machine]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like Jake LaMotta and his brother Joey in the bloody boxing classic "Raging Bull," we are gluttons for punishment. So here we are again, third week in a row, defending NPR against the bare-knuckled assault of its critics.</p><p>Our earlier pieces on the funding threat to NPR have generated plenty of punches, both pro and con. And although most of the comments were welcome, and encouraged further thinking about the value of public media in a democratic society, a few reminded us of the words of the poet and scholar James Merrick: "So high at last the contest rose/From words they almost came to blows!"</p><p>Nonetheless, reading those comments and criticisms made us realize there are a couple of points that these two wizened veterans of public broadcasting -- with the multiple tote bags and coffee mugs to prove it -- would like to clarify.</p><p>For one, when we described the right-wing media machine as NPR&#8217;s "long-time nemesis," it was not to suggest that somehow public radio is its left-wing opposite. When it comes to covering and analyzing the news, the reverse of right isn't left; it's independent reporting that toes neither party nor ideological line. We&#8217;ve heard no NPR reporter -- not a one -- advocating on the air for more government spending (or less), for the right of abortion (or against it), for or against gay marriage, or for or against either political party, especially compared to what we hear from Fox News and talk radio on all of these issues and more.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/25/moyers_winship_npr/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/25/moyers_winship_npr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>203</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House votes to cut off federal funds for NPR</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/17/congress_votes_to_defund_npr/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/17/congress_votes_to_defund_npr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 21:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/03/17/congress_votes_to_defund_npr</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Falling along party lines, the bill will now go to the Senate where it is expected to be defeated]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The House on Thursday voted to end federal funding to National Public Radio. Republican supporters said it made good fiscal sense, and Democratic opponents called it an ideological attack that would deprive local stations of access to programs such as "Car Talk" and "All Things Considered."</p><p>The bill, passed 228-192 along mainly partisan lines, would bar federal funding of NPR and prohibit local public stations from using federal money to pay NPR dues and buy its programs. The prospects of support in the Democratic-controlled Senate are slim. Seven Republicans broke ranks to vote against the bill.</p><p>"It is time for American citizens to stop funding an organization that can stand on its own feet," said Rep. Doug Lamborn, R-Colo., the sponsor. He said it was not a question of content -- which many conservatives say has a liberal bias -- but whether taxpayer dollars should go to nonessential services. "As a country we no longer have this luxury."</p><p>Other Republicans also denied that the measure was a vendetta against NPR, although the organization left itself open to conservative attacks last week when an executive, talking to conservative activists posing as members of a fake Muslim group, was caught on camera deriding the tea party movement and saying the NPR would be better off without federal funding. Both the executive and the president of NPR resigned after the incident.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/17/congress_votes_to_defund_npr/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/17/congress_votes_to_defund_npr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
