<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > NRA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/nra/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:24:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Joe Manchin will fight back against the NRA with TV ad</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/joe_manchin_will_fight_back_against_the_nra_with_tv_ad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/joe_manchin_will_fight_back_against_the_nra_with_tv_ad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 13:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Manchin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[background checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Toomey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13328584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NRA is spending $100,000 to target Manchin, following his push for a background checks measure]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Faced with a $100,000 ad campaign against him by the NRA, Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., is fighting back with a big TV ad buy of his own. “The ad will at least match the NRA’s buy,” Jonathan Kott, a Manchin aide, told Politico. “We’ll be shooting [the ad Monday] in West Virginia and we expect to go up this week."</p><p>Manchin, who co-sponsored an unsuccessful measure to increase gun background checks, has been targeted by the NRA, which released an ad tying him to the “Obama-Bloomberg gun control agenda.” In response last week, Manchin said that, “Unfortunately, the NRA leadership in Washington has lost its way and is more concerned about political power than gun rights and gun safety."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/joe_manchin_will_fight_back_against_the_nra_with_tv_ad/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/joe_manchin_will_fight_back_against_the_nra_with_tv_ad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Joe Manchin: The NRA has &#8220;lost its way&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/joe_manchin_the_nra_has_lost_its_way/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/joe_manchin_the_nra_has_lost_its_way/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 15:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Manchin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[background checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrick Toomey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13325233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Washington gun lobby "is more concerned about political power than gun rights and gun safety," he said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W. Va., sharply criticized the NRA for attacking him on his background check measure, saying that the gun lobby has "lost its way" and is not telling the truth about his stance on gun control.</p><p>Manchin was responding to a new ad put out by the group that urges his constituents to tell him to "honor his committment to the Second Amendment," and connects Manchin to the "Obama-Bloomberg gun control agenda."</p><p>Manchin co-sponsored a measure to implement stricter gun background checks, along with Republican Sen. Pat Toomey, though it failed in the Senate.</p><p>“The Washington NRA could spend one hundred million dollars on ads against me; it still won’t make what they say true," Manchin wrote in a statement, <a href="http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/joe-manchin-nra-is-lying-has-lost-its">TPM</a> reports. "If they were honest with their members they would see that my bill not only protects 2nd Amendment rights, it enhances and strengthens them."</p><p>"Unfortunately, the NRA leadership in Washington has lost its way and is more concerned about political power than gun rights and gun safety," he added.</p><p>Watch the NRA's ad:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/J_q5zqrVktg" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/joe_manchin_the_nra_has_lost_its_way/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/joe_manchin_the_nra_has_lost_its_way/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NRA mailer thanks Dem for voting against background checks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/nra_mailer_thanks_dem_for_voting_against_background_checks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/nra_mailer_thanks_dem_for_voting_against_background_checks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 20:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heidi Heitkamp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[background checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13322163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The mailer tells North Dakotans to support Heidi Heitkamp because she opposed the Senate's measure]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democratic Sen. Heidi Heitkamp's vote against the Senate's gun background check measure is getting her support from the National Rifle Association, which put out a mailer urging its supporters in North Dakota to thank Heitkamp for her vote.</p><p>From the <a href="http://www.grandforksherald.com/event/article/id/265594/group/homepage/">Grand Forks Herald</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Andrew Arulanandam, NRA spokesman, said the group wanted to make sure its members in the state express their gratitude because Heitkamp stood up to “tremendous political pressure.”</p> <p>“The NRA thinks that Sen. Heitkamp is a profile in courage and common sense. She listens to her constituents,” he said.</p></blockquote><p>Heitkamp was one of four Democrats to vote against the Manchin-Toomey Amendment. She has an A-rating from the NRA.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/nra_mailer_thanks_dem_for_voting_against_background_checks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/nra_mailer_thanks_dem_for_voting_against_background_checks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New ad targets Ayotte for vote against background checks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/04/new_ad_targets_ayotte_for_vote_against_background_checks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/04/new_ad_targets_ayotte_for_vote_against_background_checks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kelly Ayotte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[background checks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13316882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the fourth time, Mayors Against Illegal Guns is running an ad against the New Hampshire Republican]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new TV ad from the pro-gun control group Mayors Against Illegals Guns targets Sen. Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H., for her vote against background checks, and features a former police chief telling voters that Ayotte misled them on her support for the measure.</p><p>Ayotte, who voted against the Manchin-Toomey amendment to strengthen gun control background checks, has claimed that she actually voted to "improve" background checks by supporting a Republican <a href="http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=113&amp;session=1&amp;vote=00098">measure</a> instead, which would have in practice made it easier for people formerly designated as mentally ill to obtain guns.</p><p>"Senator Ayotte uses her vote for this law as an alibi to claim she is tough on crime," Police Chief Scott Knight says in the new ad, the fourth released by Mayors Against Illegal Guns against Ayotte. "Don't be fooled. She voted to kill comprehensive background checks, making us less safe. That’s a fact."</p><p>Watch:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/1GY27iWNxpA" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/04/new_ad_targets_ayotte_for_vote_against_background_checks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/04/new_ad_targets_ayotte_for_vote_against_background_checks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Colorado Dem faces recall effort over gun control support</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/04/colorado_dem_faces_recall_effort_over_gun_control_support/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/04/colorado_dem_faces_recall_effort_over_gun_control_support/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 13:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Amendment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13316706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anti-gun control activists filed to recall state Senate president John Morse ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colorado state Senate president John Morse, a Democrat, could face a recall election over his support for gun control legislation, after gun-rights activists filed a recall petition with the Colorado secretary of state.</p><p>The Basic Freedom Defense Fund submitted more than 16,000 signatures in support of the recall, and only 7,200 of them  must be validated before it is approved. The group wrote on its <a href="http://www.basicfreedomdefensefund.org/?q=node/8">website</a> that "The person who broke his oath, ignored his constituents and pushed anti-freedom and citizen disarmament legislation will be held accountable by the people."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/04/colorado_dem_faces_recall_effort_over_gun_control_support/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/04/colorado_dem_faces_recall_effort_over_gun_control_support/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pistols could be the newest poolside accessory</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/03/in_charleston_pistols_are_the_new_poolside_accessory_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/03/in_charleston_pistols_are_the_new_poolside_accessory_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 16:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ProPublica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state legislature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public pool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charleston]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13315797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[South Carolina plans to revoke a ban on arms in recreation centers, meaning more guns at Charleston's public pools]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.propublica.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/12/Logo-e1354323738840.jpg" alt="ProPublica" /></a><br /> If you feel unsafe at a public pool in Charleston, W.Va., you may soon have the right to lie there on a towel with a handgun at your side.</p><p>For 20 years, Charleston has been an island of modest gun restrictions in a very pro-gun rights state. But its gun laws — including a ban on guns in city parks, pools and recreation centers — are now likely to be rolled back, the latest victory in a long-standing push to deny cities the power to regulate guns.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/03/in_charleston_pistols_are_the_new_poolside_accessory_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/03/in_charleston_pistols_are_the_new_poolside_accessory_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>3-D-printed guns could doom the NRA</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/30/how_the_nras_true_motives_will_soon_be_exposed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/30/how_the_nras_true_motives_will_soon_be_exposed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 18:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3d Printing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3D-printed guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13312868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Silver lining to the rise of printable guns: They threaten the profitability of traditional weapons manufacturers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the National Rifle Association's image as an organization defending the rights of Americans to own guns, you might think that new technology enabling the proliferation of weapon production would be a cause the organization would support. The problem? Despite its claim to be a sportsmen’s civil rights group, the NRA is funded in large part by gun manufacturers, whose motives and goals don’t always overlap with those of the organization’s membership.</p><p>Now, with the development of new 3-D technology, which could dramatically increase the number of available weapons – <em>and </em>competition to gun manufacturers -- these two competing pressures are at odds. In other words, the NRA faces a test: Will it back the new technology and promote the rights of everyone to have unlimited guns? Or, in an effort to protect its generous contributors, chart a different path?</p><p>In the mid-20thcentury, science fiction writers imagined a 21stcentury where consumer goods and food could simply be printed in a machine quickly and at very low costs to the consumer. While this world has yet to truly materialize, we are rapidly seeing the beginnings of such a world emerge with the developments of 3-D-printing technology.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/30/how_the_nras_true_motives_will_soon_be_exposed/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/30/how_the_nras_true_motives_will_soon_be_exposed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How long can Eric Holder hang on?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/how_much_longer_can_holder_hang_on/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/how_much_longer_can_holder_hang_on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 13:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scandals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operation Fast and Furious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rahm Emanuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Axelrod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Khalid Sheik Mohammed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Panthers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13300332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's been a long, fraught tenure rife with faux-scandals and near-misses. But the AP phone flap could be different]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p dir="ltr">When Attorney General Eric Holder walked into a hearing room in the Rayburn House office building yesterday, he must have expected that lawmakers would rake him over the coals for his department’s snooping on AP reporters, but he didn’t seem nervous. After all, this pageant of scandal and Congressional grilling has become routine for Holder, who has been a lightning rod since the first days of the Obama Administration.</p><p dir="ltr">After almost four and half years on the job, he’s been the first attorney general to be held in contempt of Congress, been called “<a href="http://takingnote.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/05/03/meet-the-new-n-r-a-president/?ref=waynelapierre">rabidly un-American</a>,” and even reportedly tried to resign. A LexisNexis search for “Eric Holder” “grilled” and “Congress” returns 534 articles. Attorneys general don’t often last two presidential terms.</p><p dir="ltr">Could the AP phone records controversy could be a tipping point for the embattled AG, whom <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/14/eric-holder-democrats_n_3275083.html">even Democrats</a> have been wary to support?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/how_much_longer_can_holder_hang_on/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/how_much_longer_can_holder_hang_on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pediatricians take on the gun lobby</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/pediatricians_take_on_the_gun_lobby/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/pediatricians_take_on_the_gun_lobby/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 13:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Lobby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Academy of Pediatrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Violence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13297023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The American Academy of Pediatrics is calling gun control an issue of public health, not politics]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has renewed efforts to pressure Congress to pass gun control, calling reform an issue of public health, not politics.</p><p>The measures the group is advocating for include an assault weapon ban, a ban on high-capacity magazines, increased background checks and mandatory waiting periods for all firearm purchases.</p><p>The doctors are hoping to bring a public health perspective and peer-reviewed data to a gun debate marred by ideology and conducted along political fault lines: “What we need is a call to action, to really look at how we can change public policy that is not often affected by data,” Dr. Danielle Laraque, who heads the pediatrics department at Maimonides Infants and Children’s Hospital in Brooklyn, told a meeting of the Pediatric Academic Societies in Washington, D.C.</p><p>“Where there are more guns in the United States, there are more people dying,” added Dr. Matthew Miller of the Harvard Injury Control Research Center. “There are more women dying, there are more men dying, and there are more children dying. We are talking about a lot of people who are dying when they live in places with a lot of guns and homes with guns.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/pediatricians_take_on_the_gun_lobby/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/pediatricians_take_on_the_gun_lobby/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Freedom&#8217;s biggest army&#8221;: Scenes from the NRA convention 2013</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/scenes_from_arizona_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/scenes_from_arizona_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 18:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne LaPierre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13292919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fear, paranoia and loathing at the "most spectacular display of firearms in the world"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HOUSTON -- To swing the door on a National Rifle Association annual meeting is to enter a world where Freedom comes from a gun. The gun's purpose is not important. It doesn't have to be American made. It can be any number of shapes, so long as it has a grip, a trigger, and a barrel. But only from a gun barrel can Freedom flow. In the words of multiple NRA members who confronted protestors this past weekend, "The Second Amendment is the one thing protecting the First."</p><p>Last May in St. Louis, NRA leaders <a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/2012/04/18/standing-its-ground-the-nra-announces-all-in-at/184952">pounded away at this idea</a> in a torrent of Apocalyptic warnings about the consequences of failure in the November elections. A year later, gathering two weeks after helping defeat the biggest effort to strengthen gun laws in a generation, the same men delivered the NRA's Second Amendment gospel with a newfound swagger. Unchanged was the primacy of guns and gun rights in the NRA's understanding of the world and everything in it. In his opening speech, Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre <a href="http://www.nranews.com/home/video/2013-nra-annual-meetings-wayne-lapierre/list/2013-annual-meetings">described the gun enthusiasts</a> before him as "Freedom's biggest army, greatest hope, and brightest future." The group's chief lobbyist-strategist, the boyish Tennessean Chris Cox, <a href="http://www.nranews.com/home/video/2013-nra-annual-meetings-nra-ila-exec-dir-chris-w-cox/list/2013-annual-meetings">celebrated the convention</a> as "the biggest celebration ever of American values," whose <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/05/06/nra-has-record-conference-turnout-new-president/">86,000-plus attendees</a> embodied "the essence of participation in American democracy."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/scenes_from_arizona_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/scenes_from_arizona_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>109</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can more armed guards keep our schools safe?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/can_more_armed_guards_keep_our_schools_safe_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/can_more_armed_guards_keep_our_schools_safe_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 21:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Crime Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[School shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nasro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13291900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some school security guards say those who oppose arming officers ignore the reality of violence in the classroom]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.thecrimereport.org/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/04/crime-report-logo-e1364939200977.png" alt="The Crime Report" /></a> The debate over placing more armed guards in schools has turned the spotlight on school resource officers who comprise an increasing share of  law enforcement personnel in schools—and who worry that their role is misunderstood.</p><p>A point of view largely missing from the discussion is whether someone who is sworn to protect school safety should be armed, says Mo Canady, executive director of the <a href="http://www.nasro.org/" target="_blank">National Association of School Resource Officers</a> (NASRO)</p><p>“When I first got started in this, I was a little concerned that kids were going to be focused on my gun,” adds Canady, a former police lieutenant who spent 12 of his 25 years as a school safety officer in Hoover, AL—where he still lives, and where the national association is based.</p><p>“But they weren’t. As I interacted with them and got to know them, it humanized my role. And, yes, I do realize that they still were seeing me as law enforcement.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/can_more_armed_guards_keep_our_schools_safe_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/can_more_armed_guards_keep_our_schools_safe_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Must-see morning clip: Fear-mongering at the NRA convention</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/must_see_morning_clip_fear_mongering_at_the_nra_convention/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/must_see_morning_clip_fear_mongering_at_the_nra_convention/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 13:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must see morning clip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daily show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne LaPierre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13291588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The main message: "Good guys with guns stop bad guys with guns"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon Stewart shares the "Good the Bad and the Crazy" -- with no shortage of crazy -- from the NRA convention in Houston:</p><div style="background-color: #000000; width: 520px;"> <div style="padding: 4px;"><iframe src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/embed/mgid:cms:video:thedailyshow.com:426068" frameborder="0" width="512" height="288"></iframe></p> <p style="text-align: left; background-color: #ffffff; padding: 4px; margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 0px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mon-may-6-2013/the-good--the-bad-and-the-crazy">The Daily Show with Jon Stewart</a></strong><br /> Get More: <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/">Daily Show Full Episodes</a>,<a href="http://www.comedycentral.com/indecision">Indecision Political Humor</a>,<a href="http://www.facebook.com/thedailyshow">The Daily Show on Facebook</a></p> </div> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/must_see_morning_clip_fear_mongering_at_the_nra_convention/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/must_see_morning_clip_fear_mongering_at_the_nra_convention/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NRA hides bleeding Obama-look-alike target from convention</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/05/nra_hides_bleeding_obama_look_alike_target_from_convention/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/05/nra_hides_bleeding_obama_look_alike_target_from_convention/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2013 20:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13290256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Zombie Industries has been asked to remove the model from its display, but is still allowed to sell it ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NRA has asked vendor Zombie Industries to remove one of its three-dimensional, "life sized" shooting targets from an NRA convention in Houston because of the target's uncanny resemblance to President Barack Obama.  The particular model, pictured above, is reminiscent of the "History Channel's" Satan, dubbed "<a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/barack_obama_doppelganger_plays_satan_in_bible_miniseries_conservatives_react/">Obama Satan</a>" by conservatives for the devil's resemblance to the president.</p><p>Sources at the conference <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/bennyjohnson/national-rifle-association-bans-bleeding-obama-target-others">spoke to BuzzFeed</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/05/nra_hides_bleeding_obama_look_alike_target_from_convention/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/05/nra_hides_bleeding_obama_look_alike_target_from_convention/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>67</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t forget Sandy Hook</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/we_cant_afford_to_forget_sandy_hook_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/we_cant_afford_to_forget_sandy_hook_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 15:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BillMoyers.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook Shootings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne LaPierre]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13288783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Newtown families and a spate of recent gun violence remind us why we can't let gun control legislation die]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week, we <a href="http://billmoyers.com/episode/preview-the-sandy-hook-promise/" target="_blank">spent time with Francine and David Wheeler</a>, parents of six-year-old Ben Wheeler, one of the 20 children and six educators shot and killed at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut. Francine and David moved from New York City to Newtown to raise a family somewhere safe. They could never have imagined that in that quiet place on a Friday morning, just days before Christmas, gunfire would take their younger son’s life.</p><p>The Wheelers’ courage and commitment deeply touched us. Since their son’s death, they have managed to cope with memory and hold together their lives — and the life of their surviving son, Nate — with uncommon grace. Along with other Newtown families, they lobbied the Connecticut state legislature — which now has the toughest gun law in America — and in Washington, they walked the halls of Capitol Hill, urging senators to vote yes for the amendment that would expand the use of background checks for people buying guns.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/we_cant_afford_to_forget_sandy_hook_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/we_cant_afford_to_forget_sandy_hook_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NRA is getting a new president</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/nra_is_getting_a_new_president/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/nra_is_getting_a_new_president/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 22:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Keene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne LaPierre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Porter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13288012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An Alabama attorney will replace David Keene as the head of the gun lobby]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Keene will be replaced by Alabama attorney Jim Porter as president of the NRA, once Keene's two-year term officially ends at this weekend's NRA convention in Houston.</p><p><a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/05/01/nra-to-get-new-president/">CNN</a> reports:</p><blockquote><p>While Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre is widely known as the face of the NRA, Keene had an active role in publicity and media appearances, especially in the wake of the Newtown elementary school massacre that left 26 people dead.</p> <p>Porter has been serving as the NRA's first vice president, and before that he served as the group's second vice president. The presidency, an unpaid position, is the next stop in the NRA's leadership rotation.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/nra_is_getting_a_new_president/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/nra_is_getting_a_new_president/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big money arms the NRA</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/big_money_arms_the_nra_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/big_money_arms_the_nra_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Center for Public Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne LaPierre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[background checks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13286529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The failure of background checks legislation is no great mystery. The gun industry has Washington in its pocket]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.publicintegrity.org/node/12462/syndication/tracking"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/04/center-500px-logo-e1365812656958.jpg" alt="The Center for Public Integrity" align="left" /></a> In the days leading up to last month’s crucial votes on the most significant gun control legislation to come before the Senate in nearly two decades, polls showed that about 90 percent of Americans supported background checks for all gun purchases. But when the clerk called the roll, the centerpiece amendment — requiring background checks for firearm sales at gun shows, through classified ads and on the Internet — got just <a href="http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=113&amp;session=1&amp;vote=00097" target="_blank">54 “yea’s,”</a> six votes short of the 60 vote super-majority required.<span style="font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;"> </span></p><p>Just four months after Adam Lanza killed 26 people at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., and President Obama promised tougher gun laws, the vote proved to be the latest in a long-running string of victories for gun rights activists, the firearms industry and particularly the National Rifle Association, the nation’s pre-eminent gun lobby.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/big_money_arms_the_nra_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/big_money_arms_the_nra_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to interpret Kirsten Gillibrand&#8217;s political opportunism</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/how_to_interpret_kirsten_gillibrands_political_opportunism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/how_to_interpret_kirsten_gillibrands_political_opportunism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kirsten Gillibrand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rape in the military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13284867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The skilled, potential presidential candidate has changed many of her positions. But do the ends justify the means?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You're not allowed, it seems, to write an article about New York Sen. and possible presidential hopeful Kirsten Gillibrand without comparing her to Tracy Flick (Politico yesterday dutifully <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/04/kirsten-gillibrand-run-for-president-90706.html">observed</a> the tradition). Yes, Gillibrand is ambitious, female and blonde and has been said to have sharp elbows -- it's taken less than that to trot out the "Election" protagonist before -- but there may be a more interesting comparison here: Mitt Romney.</p><p>When Gillibrand -- a hot topic in political circles this week, as a potential liberal <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/04/kirsten-gillibrand-run-for-president-90706.html">presidential candidate</a> and a champion for <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/senate_takes_steps_to_reduce_sexual_violence_in_the_military/">addressing sexual assault in the military</a> -- was appointed to Hillary Clinton's Senate seat in 2009, Nate Silver <a href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/01/is-kennedys-loss-conservatives-gain.html">wrote</a>, "This is not a terrific outcome for progressive Democrats," because "Gillibrand, statistically speaking, has been one of the more conservative Democrats in the House. Moreover, she is a somewhat proud conservative, being a member of the Blue Dog caucus. In a state like New York, which is capable of electing and re-electing a very liberal senator, that’s a somewhat underachieving result for the Democrats."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/how_to_interpret_kirsten_gillibrands_political_opportunism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/how_to_interpret_kirsten_gillibrands_political_opportunism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anheuser-Busch heir resigns life-long NRA membership</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/anheuser_busch_heir_resigns_life_long_nra_membership/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/anheuser_busch_heir_resigns_life_long_nra_membership/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 02:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Keene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne LaPierre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adolphus Busch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13275856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adolphus Busch IV is angry that the NRA helped defeat the Senate bill which would have expanded background checks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The great-grandson of the Anheuser-Busch company <a href="http://www.ksdk.com/news/article/376098/3/KSDK-Exclusive-Adolphus-Busch-IV-resigns-NRA-membership-">renounced</a> his membership in the National Rifle Association on Thursday, furious that the NRA helped defeat the Senate bill which would have expanded background checks in response to the tragedy in Newtown.</p><p>Adolphus Busch IV, in a letter to NRA president David Keene <a href="http://www.ksdk.com/news/article/376098/3/KSDK-Exclusive-Adolphus-Busch-IV-resigns-NRA-membership-">obtained by a St. Louis television station,</a> wrote that "I fail to see how the NRA can disregard the overwhelming will of its members who see background checks as reasonable."</p><p>He said that the NRA seems to have become a lobby for gun and ammunition manufacturers, rather than one for hunters and gun owners.</p><p><span style="font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;">"One only has to ask why the NRA reversed its original position on background checks. Was it not the NRA position to support background checks when Mr. (Wayne) LaPierre himself stated in 1999 that NRA saw checks as 'reasonable'?"</span></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/anheuser_busch_heir_resigns_life_long_nra_membership/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/anheuser_busch_heir_resigns_life_long_nra_membership/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>59</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Celebrities condemn Senate for blocking gun control bill</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/celebrities_condemn_senate_for_blocking_gun_control_bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/celebrities_condemn_senate_for_blocking_gun_control_bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[background checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13275472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Including "Breaking Bad" stars Bryan Cranston and Aaron Paul ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's been an <a href="http://www.theonion.com/articles/jesus-this-week,32105/">especially bad week in America</a>. Adding insult to injury, the Senate failed to pass a gun control measure expanding background checks -- a bill that's been highly anticipated since the Newtown massacre.</p><p>Celebrities took to Twitter to condemn the senators and NRA lobbyists who worked to shut down the bill.</p><p>Aaron Paul retweeted "Breaking Bad" cast member Bryan Cranston:</p><p>[embedtweet id="324947583946596353"]</p><p>Actress Elizabeth Banks tweeted a link to an article that shared the Twitter handles of the senators who voted to block the bill:</p><p>[embedtweet id="324870675972120576"]</p><p>And many other celebs vocalized disappointment and anger and ridicule:</p><p>[embedtweet id="324704403934281728"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="324642787339427840"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="324620966653210624"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="324654247587229696"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="324630844021026816"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="324633175450083329"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="324635220978585600"]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/celebrities_condemn_senate_for_blocking_gun_control_bill/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/celebrities_condemn_senate_for_blocking_gun_control_bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate rejects expanded background checks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/senate_rejects_expanded_background_checks_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/senate_rejects_expanded_background_checks_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 20:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13274194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The vote was a major victory for the NRA, which opposed the plan as an infringement on gun rights]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — The Senate has rejected a bipartisan effort to expand federal background checks to more firearms buyers in a crucial showdown over gun control.</p><p>Wednesday's vote was a jarring blow to the drive to curb firearms sparked by December's massacre of children and staff at an elementary school in Newtown, Conn. President Barack Obama made broadened background checks the centerpiece of his gun control proposals.</p><p>The roll call was also a victory for the National Rifle Association, which opposed the plan as an ineffective infringement on gun rights.</p><p>The proposal would have required background checks for all transactions at gun shows and online. Currently they must occur for sales handled by licensed gun dealers.</p><p>The system is designed to keep criminals and people with mental problems from getting guns.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/senate_rejects_expanded_background_checks_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/senate_rejects_expanded_background_checks_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
