<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Nudity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/nudity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:24:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>J.J. Abrams reveals deleted shower scene with Benedict Cumberbatch</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/23/j_j_abrams_reveals_deleted_shower_scene_with_benedict_cumberbatch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/23/j_j_abrams_reveals_deleted_shower_scene_with_benedict_cumberbatch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 12:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benedict cumberbatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jj abrams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek Into Darkness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alice eve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nudity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13306706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Responding to the controversy over Alice Eve's underwear shot, the "Star Trek" director offered up a shirtless Khan]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last night on "Conan," "Star Trek Into Darkness" director J.J. Abrams acknowledged fan criticism of a scene in which Alice Eve disrobes -- which writer and producer Damon Lindelof <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/damon_lindelof_admits_barely_clothed_scene_in_star_trek_was_gratuitous/">called "gratuitous"</a> -- saying: "Some people feel that I was exploiting her. While she is lovely, I can see their point." </p><p>Although Abrams attempted to balance Eve's partial nudity in the film with a shirtless shot of Chris Pine, to tip the scale, Abrams last night released a deleted scene of British star Benedict Cumberbatch taking a shower. And not just any shower-- "a shower of evil," he said.</p><p><iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/7LXKjjS-eZI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/23/j_j_abrams_reveals_deleted_shower_scene_with_benedict_cumberbatch/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/23/j_j_abrams_reveals_deleted_shower_scene_with_benedict_cumberbatch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Damon Lindelof admits barely-clothed scene in &#8220;Star Trek&#8221; was &#8220;gratuitous&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/damon_lindelof_admits_barely_clothed_scene_in_star_trek_was_gratuitous/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/damon_lindelof_admits_barely_clothed_scene_in_star_trek_was_gratuitous/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jj abrams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damon lindelof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nudity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13304403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The producer and head writer "takes responsibility" for a scene in which actress Alice Eve randomly disrobes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if you have not yet seen "Star Trek Into Darkness," you may have seen <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/benedict_cumberbatch_looks_very_evil_in_new_star_trek_trailer/">the trailer</a>, in which Starfleet science officer Doctor Carol Marcus, played by Alice Eve, strips down to her underwear before putting on a special torpedo-disarming outfit. The scene has puzzled some fans, prompting <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/2013/may/21/star-trek-into-darkness-writer-underwear-scene">criticism</a> that it objectifies one of only two major female cast members.</p><p>In a recent interview, <a href="http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1707650/star-trek-into-darkness-spoiler-special-burning-questions-answered.jhtml">MTV</a> asked producer Damon Lindelof about the scene:</p><blockquote><p>OK, down to the nitty gritty. I feel like I have to start with the biggest mystery/conversation that's surrounded the film from the get go. Why is Alice Eve in her underwear at one point? Oh and also, let's discuss your villain.</p></blockquote><p>Lindelof's response:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/damon_lindelof_admits_barely_clothed_scene_in_star_trek_was_gratuitous/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/damon_lindelof_admits_barely_clothed_scene_in_star_trek_was_gratuitous/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Game of Thrones&#8221; Recap: Flaming swords!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/game_of_thrones_recap_now_were_cooking_with_hot_swords/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/game_of_thrones_recap_now_were_cooking_with_hot_swords/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Game of Thrones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[game of thrones recap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nudity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13283407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Male nudity, a beheading and paternal authority run wild]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let’s start with the most substantial aspect of this episode: man butt. “Kissed by Fire” is the episode of “Game of Thrones” where the writers finally said, “OK, OK, we will do<em> </em>something about our show's gross nudity imbalance across genders.” So after Ygritte takes off her clothes, it’s John and Jaime’s turn to flash some tush, and then Loras’s conquest/Littlefinger’s spy puts a new twist on the “random character we have never met going full frontal” role just by being a man, instead of woman.</p><p>Even more remarkably, the camera opts not to ogle Brienne of Tarth, treating her with the sort of restraint it usually reserves for its male characters. Jaime climbs in the bathtub with her and goads her into anger; she lurches up at him in the altogether. But while Jaime gets a good look at the whole Brienne, the camera stays squarely on her face and shoulders, never straying down. We see a flash of her backside, but that's exactly the amount of nudity usually asked of the fellas. This is both respectful and complicated: Brienne, who is more ‘masculine’ than the other female characters, more attuned to the idea of male honor, gets treated with visual restraint. I’m sure, if she knew, she would appreciate the courtesy. But maybe all the other women on the show would prefer not being objectified too?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/game_of_thrones_recap_now_were_cooking_with_hot_swords/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/game_of_thrones_recap_now_were_cooking_with_hot_swords/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who cares about seeing Ashley Judd naked?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/who_cares_about_seeing_ashley_judd_naked/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/who_cares_about_seeing_ashley_judd_naked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 18:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ashley Judd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nudity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13219532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Daily Caller's latest attack rings hollow in the age of sexting, boob songs and Bush's leaked self-portraits]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have probably seen Ashley Judd naked. The Daily Caller would like to remind you of this in the context of her probable plans to run for Senate in Kentucky. The question is, does anyone care anymore about whom they've seen naked? And if they do, will they care in a decade or two?</p><p>Yes, the Daily Caller piece, to which I refuse to link, was sexist and gross. It was, as ThinkProgress's Alyssa Rosenberg <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/alyssa/2013/03/04/1665011/theatrical-slut-shaming-daily-caller-attacks-ashley-judd-for-movie-nude-scenes/">put it</a>, "part and parcel of the right’s current strategy to discredit promising female advocates," and "an attempt to make her seem less serious by impugning her sexual chastity." Was Scott Brown's strategically placed <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2013/03/potential-senate-candidate-ashley-judd-on-screen-nudity-naked-actors-politicians">arm</a> over the flesh he bared in Cosmo the difference between his getting elected to the Senate and not, or was it the double standard?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/who_cares_about_seeing_ashley_judd_naked/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/who_cares_about_seeing_ashley_judd_naked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>64</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did the Internet kill &#8220;Girls Gone Wild&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/did_the_internet_kill_girls_gone_wild/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/did_the_internet_kill_girls_gone_wild/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 20:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[girls gone wild]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joe francis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Wynn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nudity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exploitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spring breakers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13216140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Joe Francis empire faces bankruptcy, marking the end of an era. But don't worry, you can still see naked ladies]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the world is tired of sloppy drunk chicks taking off their tops for trucker hats, it is tired of itself. World, we must be damn weary. The Joe Francis "Girls Gone Wild" empire has filed for bankruptcy protection.</p><p>I'm sure you're absolutely heartbroken over what will happen to the man who's made a living finding young women whose judgment is deeply impaired and coercing them into acts that range from a flash of boobies to reportedly <a href="http://www.latimes.com/features/la-tm-gonewild32aug06,0,6367343.story">losing their virginity to him.</a> Across the nation, women everywhere are so sad, they're leaving their shirts on and can't even muster a single, forlorn "<em>whooooooo</em>."</p><p>There was a time, just a few years ago, when Francis seemed to have the Midas touch, a moment when everything in his path turned into nipples and girl-on-girl makeout sessions. Francis was said to have been worth $150 million, and his future looked like it would continue to be more of the same. After all, what's a more reliable moneymaker than youth and poor decision-making?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/did_the_internet_kill_girls_gone_wild/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/did_the_internet_kill_girls_gone_wild/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Girls&#8221; recap: &#8220;I feel like I&#8217;m in a Nancy Meyers movie&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/11/girls_recap_i_feel_like_im_in_a_nancy_meyers_movie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/11/girls_recap_i_feel_like_im_in_a_nancy_meyers_movie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 03:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Girls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nudity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patrick stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lena Dunham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv recap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Girls recap]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13196926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hannah has an epiphany during a lost weekend with a Café Grumpy customer. But will it alter her life's course?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there's a way to win this critic's heart, it's to begin an episode by having Hannah make up a neologism that Urban Dictionary reveals already exists ("sexit"), only to have beautiful Patrick Wilson barge in to the coffeeshop where she works,. (If Patrick Wilson — here, brownstone-owner and physician Joshua — had been complaining about someone leaving dogshit on his lawn instead of employees leaving their trash in his garbage, Dunham would have hit the trifecta.)</p><p>In this episode, Hannah winds up in said brownstone after Ray, irate that his neighbor is asking him to do anything outside the realm of the door of the shop, assumes a defensive rigidity. Joshua (who, we learn later, insists on the “ua”) is not irate back, but confused. “I was hoping we could talk neighbor to neighbor,” he says, perplexed. No luck. To this grownup, they're on the same street. To Ray, they're not even in the same world.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/11/girls_recap_i_feel_like_im_in_a_nancy_meyers_movie/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/11/girls_recap_i_feel_like_im_in_a_nancy_meyers_movie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Naked if I want to: Lena Dunham&#8217;s body politic</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/09/naked_if_i_want_to_lena_dunhams_body_politic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/09/naked_if_i_want_to_lena_dunhams_body_politic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2013 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lena Dunham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carolee schneemann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judy chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Girls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nudity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public nudity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[miranda july]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gloria Steinem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cindy sherman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oberlin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delusional downtown divas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13191113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Critics can't stop cringing, but the "Girls" star's prolific nudity harks to a decades-old feminist art tradition ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Hollywood, it seems you're only allowed to be naked if you're Megan Fox. If you're not, you had better be apologetic about it, like Melissa McCarthy in "Mike &amp; Molly." But God forbid you're a woman with an unconventionally beautiful body and you're okay with it. That's when people like <a href="http://blog.zap2it.com/pop2it/2013/01/howard-stern-calls-fat-girl-lena-dunhams-girls-sex-scenes-rape.html">Howard Stern start to get hysterical</a>: Lena Dunham, whom the radio host described as a <a href="http://blog.zap2it.com/pop2it/2013/01/howard-stern-calls-fat-girl-lena-dunhams-girls-sex-scenes-rape.html">"little fat girl who kind of looks like Jonah Hill” and likened her taking off her clothes to rape</a>, has become a feminist heroine largely due to the fact that she unapologetically parades her naked body across the TV screen. Dunham has been both derided and deified for baring her unconventionally beautiful figure throughout both seasons of her HBO series. (And don't expect her to stop anytime soon, she told Entertainment Weekly in a February cover story: "My point with getting naked is never proven.") And through her performance, she has established a new body ideal. Carolee Schneemann, the feminist artist who originated nude performance art in the ’60s and was dubbed “body beautiful” for her stunning figure, believes Dunham does more than add a dose of reality to the “deformations” – “the swollen puffed up lips, the emaciated shapes, the huge inflated boobs” – that populate Tinseltown. “There’s nothing deformed about Dunham,” she said. “She’s the ideal of normal.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/09/naked_if_i_want_to_lena_dunhams_body_politic/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/09/naked_if_i_want_to_lena_dunhams_body_politic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>104</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Waxing our way to the ER</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/waxing_our_way_to_the_er/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/waxing_our_way_to_the_er/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 19:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazilian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[body hair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pubic hair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[porn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nudity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jezebel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grooming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13193786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Grooming accidents are exploding. When did we start hating pubes?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just in case you still haven't read your December issue of Urology, here's the best piece of advice you'll get today: Don't drink and shave your pubes. You're welcome.</p><p>A new study from the University of California-San Diego reveals that "<a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/health/ouch-pubic-hair-care-sends-er-study-article-1.1257037">Emergency room visits due to pubic hair grooming mishaps,"</a> including <em>oh my God no no noooo</em> "lacerations," increased fivefold between 2002 and 2010, sending an impressive 11,704 pube-scapers to the E.R. The culprits? Scissors and hot wax did some of the damage, but plain-old non-electric-razors accounted for the lion's share, at 83 percent. Now if you'll excuse me, I'll be under my desk, rocking slowly back and forth and crying as I think about this.</p><p>The study also revealed that below-the-belt grooming isn't just for adult ladies anymore – men accounted for 43.3 percent of the injuries, and almost 30 percent of them were girls under the age of 18. To avoid becoming yet another harrowing grooming gone bad statistic, the researchers advise hair removal aficionados to "Pay attention to where you're placing that razor. Invest in a non-slip bath mat. And don't shave while under the influence of drugs or alcohol." Yeah, don't do that. For the love of God don't do that.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/waxing_our_way_to_the_er/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/waxing_our_way_to_the_er/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>70</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Girls&#8221; recap: The contact high</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/28/girls_recap_the_contact_high/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/28/girls_recap_the_contact_high/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Girls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lena Dunham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cocaine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nudity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Girls recap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13183161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A dubious writing assignment pushes Hannah out of her comfort zone so she can discover "where the magic happens" ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's hard to get old. By the time you reach 30, not only do the joyful events of life — parties, medication, sex — become inexpressibly tedious, you've begun to realize that any major life change — divorce, skin elasticity, death — is likely to be very unpleasant.</p><p>In precisely the reverse position are Hannah and her crew, who desire the perceived privileges of adulthood without being able to handle its most mundane tasks. This episode, Hannah finally puts her finger on it. Manic on cocaine (we'll get to that in a second), she tells the equally high Elijah, "I want to learn to write a check properly! I'm saying I want to be independent, but all these little things block me from it — block me!"</p><p>When you can't write a check, sometimes the only way to feel old in your twenties is to be with an adult who, presumably, can. (You don't realize what's wrong with them wanting to be with someone who can't write a check.) Last episode, George was the brave elder who has made the plunge with Elijah and withdrew. This episode, the children — and they are children — are easy prey for adults who don't want to get old.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/28/girls_recap_the_contact_high/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/28/girls_recap_the_contact_high/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Girls&#8221; recap: You reap what you show</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/21/girls_recap_you_reap_what_you_show/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/21/girls_recap_you_reap_what_you_show/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Girls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lena Dunham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nudity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[andrew rannells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[allison williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13176698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyone puts themselves out there, fishing for feedback — but no one likes what they hear]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>“It was really well-written!”</p></blockquote><p>This is the damning charge leveled at Hannah's essay in this second installment of our second season — tragically, by Sandy, the perfect partner who we now learn is less-than-perfectly attentive and, perhaps consequently, a Republican. After a season of fighting for self-expression, Hannah and her girlfriends have learned that self-expression is wonderful, until someone actually notices what you're expressing.</p><p>Sandy saying that Hannah's essay “isn't for me,” that damn lacking even faint praise, is the least of it. Marnie, out on the job market, finds her Ann Taylor suits and Revlon-ready features are a complete liability in the art world. (“Where do you ... get a suit like that?” one job interviewer asks.) Jessa's artistry has been entirely stymied by her new, emotionally fulfilling life. (“I'm not used to painting someone I love,” she tells her shirtless, posing husband.) And, unfortunately, Hannah's “open dialogue” with Sandy about her writing quickly spreads into an open dialogue about how they actually see each other. When Hannah decides their political differences are too vast a crevasse for her to bridge, Sandy tells she's the typical white girl who moves to the city and decides to date a black guy. (Finger quotes.) Hannah flies back with the familiar-sounding,“It's ironic, because I never thought about the fact that you were black. I don't live in a world with divisions like that.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/21/girls_recap_you_reap_what_you_show/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/21/girls_recap_you_reap_what_you_show/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Megan Fox, commodified</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/megan_fox_commodified/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/megan_fox_commodified/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Megan Fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nudity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[naked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lena Dunham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adele]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13172355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["The last American bombshell," who swore she'd never do a nude scene, is undressed by Esquire's wild imagination]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Megan Fox is an actress who, after getting her start in silly action films like "Transformers" and "Jonah Hex," has tried to branch out. In 2012, she was a supporting player in two serious-minded comedies with a melancholy edge, "Friends With Kids" and "This is 40." <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/15/magazine/15Fox-t.html?pagewanted=all">She told the New York Times Magazine's Lynn Hirschberg in 2009</a>, “I do live in a glass box. And I am on display for men to pay to look at me. And that bothers me. I don’t want to live that character.” She claimed that her body parts were the only thing that were hers, and thus she'd never do a nude scene on film.</p><p>That article hinged on Fox's rather unsuccessful attempts to define herself as something other than a sex-bomb starlet, an attempt that, for whatever reason but not for lack of trying, has evidently been unsuccessful. Fox is profiled in the new issue of Esquire. She strips down for the camera as the author waxes rhapsodic: <a href="http://www.esquire.com/features/megan-fox-photos-interview-0213">The actress is</a> "a screen saver on a teenage boy's laptop, a middle-aged lawyer's shower fantasy, a sexual prop used to sell movies and jeans."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/megan_fox_commodified/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/megan_fox_commodified/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Howard Stern reaches out to Lena Dunham to clarify &#8220;little fat chick&#8221; comment</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/howard_stern_reaches_out_to_lena_dunham_to_clarify_little_fat_chick_comment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/howard_stern_reaches_out_to_lena_dunham_to_clarify_little_fat_chick_comment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[howard stern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lena Dunham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nudity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[howard stern show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Girls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13171081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The radio host says his quote was taken out of context. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After calling her a "little fat girl" on air last week, Howard Stern is trying to take back (some of) his criticism of "Girls" creator Lena Dunham, saying today, "It makes me feel bad and I think she is getting the impression that I somehow think she’s just a talentless little fat chick." In the clip <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJIIf5IbTyA">put out by Sirius</a>, however, the shock jock doesn't seem to be apologizing for calling Dunham names, but rather, for the journalists who he claims took his quotes "out of context," calling it "a hatchet job."</p><p>But it's hard to see what was taken out of context from the original program, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q37X5GxwTXY">partially taped here</a>. Stern said on Jan. 7, "I like 'Sex and the City,' but this 'Girls'...it's a little fat girl who looks like Jonah Hill and keeps taking her clothes off and it kind of feels like a rape...I don't want to see that." Calling himself "brave" for watching the show, Stern continued, "Well then I learn that this little fat chick writes the show and directs the show and that makes sense to me because she's such a camera hog that the other characters barely are on." He added, "Good for her. It's hard for little fat chicks to get anything going." He also clarified that if it were up to him, he'd have stopped watching after episode 2. "I'm forcing myself to watch it," he said.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/howard_stern_reaches_out_to_lena_dunham_to_clarify_little_fat_chick_comment/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/howard_stern_reaches_out_to_lena_dunham_to_clarify_little_fat_chick_comment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TV&#8217;s most naked truth</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/lena_dunhams_nude_revolution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/lena_dunhams_nude_revolution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nudity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[naked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nakedness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lena Dunham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Girls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex and the City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nudists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[naturists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xojane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13169748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What does the "Girls" star's casual nudity say about us -- and the Howard Sterns made so uncomfortable by it?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the run-up to Sunday night’s “Girls” season premiere, the old repetitive war over the show’s content took on a new dimension: Radio shock jock Howard Stern attacked neither the youth nor the perceived entitlement of showrunner/star Lena Dunham, but her display of her body. <a href="http://blog.zap2it.com/pop2it/2013/01/howard-stern-calls-fat-girl-lena-dunhams-girls-sex-scenes-rape.html">Stern called Dunham</a> “a little fat girl who kinda looks like Jonah Hill and she keeps taking her clothes off and it kind of feels like rape ... I don't want to see that.” New York Post TV critic <a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/entertainment/tv/new_girl_on_top_mBHbR1rcwafv9yieVNDWfN?utm_source=SFnewyorkpost&amp;utm_medium=SFnewyorkpost">Linda Stasi took a similar tack</a>, calling Dunham “a woman with giant thighs, a sloppy backside and small breasts ... compelled to show it all.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/lena_dunhams_nude_revolution/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/lena_dunhams_nude_revolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Girls&#8221; recap: Gloves — and clothes — are off!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/girls_recap_gloves_%e2%80%94_and_clothes_%e2%80%94_are_off/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/girls_recap_gloves_%e2%80%94_and_clothes_%e2%80%94_are_off/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 04:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Girls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lena Dunham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nudity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex and the City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recaps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13169778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hannah hasn't yet made up with Marnie or Adam. But at least she's got a new roommate and a hot boyfriend — for now]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it was June; it is now January. We have re-elected Obama, and shaken off Sandy's dousing of the entire Northeast. Gay marriage advocates are increasingly winning; global-warming activists, not so much. India is rocked by an uproar about violence against women, a soccer team has followed their teammate off the pitch in protest after he's harassed by racist taunts, and 27 children and teachers have been massacred in a shooting in Newton, Connecticut. It's not an entirely differently world, but it's not exactly the same one either. And how does "Girls" choose to enter it?</p><p>Right away, there's a black person. A black man. On screen. Having sex with Hannah. “You wanted this,” he huffs to viewers. “You're finally getting this. It's about fucking time.” Yes, thank you, Lena. We did.</p><p>It's season two, and if Lena Dunham has taken her critics' comments on race, sex, and class somewhat to heart, the song remains the same. In the first few scenes, instead of Marnie flung around Hannah in her bedroom, it's new roommate Elijah, who has a boner. (“It's not for you.”) Trim Marnie has now been dumped not only by her boyfriend but, despite that great blue dress, her boss. Shoshanna faces her post-virgin life sporting a Katherine Hepburn–like frigidity belied by her frilled, Freudian fascinator; and Jessa, who is mostly absent from this episode, heads back from her honeymoon tanned, corn-rowed, and still not knowing her husband's address.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/girls_recap_gloves_%e2%80%94_and_clothes_%e2%80%94_are_off/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/girls_recap_gloves_%e2%80%94_and_clothes_%e2%80%94_are_off/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Public nudity ban considered in San Francisco</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/18/public_nudity_ban_considered_in_san_francisco/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/18/public_nudity_ban_considered_in_san_francisco/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 19:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nudity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Castro District]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public nudity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13102291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Battles continues between Castro District nudists and the area supervisor]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — San Francisco may be getting ready to shed its image as a city where anything goes, including clothing.</p><p>City lawmakers are scheduled to vote Tuesday on an ordinance that would prohibit nudity in most public places, a blanket ban that represents an escalation of a two-year tiff between a devoted group of men who strut their stuff through the city's famously gay Castro District and the supervisor who represents the area.</p><p>Supervisor Scott Wiener's proposal would make it illegal for a person over the age of 5 to "expose his or her genitals, perineum or anal region on any public street, sidewalk, street median, parklet or plaza" or while using public transit.</p><p>A first offense would carry a maximum penalty of a $100 fine, but prosecutors would have authority to charge a third violation as a misdemeanor punishable by up to a $500 fine and a year in jail. Exemptions would be made for participants at permitted street fairs and parades, such as the city's annual gay pride event and the Folsom Street Fair, which celebrates sadomasochism and other sexual subcultures.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/18/public_nudity_ban_considered_in_san_francisco/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/18/public_nudity_ban_considered_in_san_francisco/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are online nudie pics an art form?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/01/are_online_nudie_pics_an_art_form/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/01/are_online_nudie_pics_an_art_form/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince Harry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TMZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nudity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12999178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's time to radically rethink the way we approach nude images sent through social media]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you've happened upon any tabloid media over the past week, you've likely seen the scowling, scolding headlines about Prince Harry's "wild night in Vegas." The shock and awe directed toward the now 27-year-old son of Princess Di was not necessarily about his "wild night," however, but directed in particular towards photos leaked by some of his comrades during a night of nude billiards. Of course, it was such a scandal—Harry's whole life seems to be about having the absolute minimum amount of decorum expected of him as a royal -- but one can imagine the collective gasp heard 'round Buckingham Palace when his naked butt landed on the Internet. But the typically Victorian horror from the royals brought to light a valid question for Americans, who were ostensibly untethered from the Queen's morals 200 years ago: why are we so freaked out about sexting? Why are we so freaked out about Internet nudes? And does our fear of the union of the naked human body and technology create an environment where bad-news exploiters (like "revenge pornographer" Hunter Moore) can thrive?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/01/are_online_nudie_pics_an_art_form/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/01/are_online_nudie_pics_an_art_form/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cop fights for vampire nudes</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/30/cop_fights_for_vampire_nudes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/30/cop_fights_for_vampire_nudes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nudity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vampires]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12996108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The San Francisco Police Department suspended him over his supernatural nude photography. Now he's suing]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"She's supposed to be a tree nymph," he explains, pointing to <a href="http://www.peanutart.com/ashley%20(1292)W.jpg">a photo of a nude woman</a> wearing green body paint and hugging a tree. Thirty-six-year-old Gared Hansen holds up <a href="http://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/111213/13/4ee7bddb52c78.jpg">a photo</a> of a naked blond whose body is airbrushed so that it looks like her skin has fallen away to reveal her mechanical interior. "Obviously," he says, "she’s supposed to be a broken robot."</p><p>"Right," I say, crossing out "cyborg" in my notes.</p><p>There are shots of vampires, witches, mermaids and more -- all scantily clad or in the buff (see <a href="?p=12996287&amp;preview=true">the slide show</a>). We're sitting at the kitchen table in his home in Antioch, Calif., looking at Hansen's supernatural nude photography as his Rottweiler enthusiastically licks our feet. This hobby of his has twice gotten him suspended as a San Francisco police officer. Now he's suing the department, claiming it violated his free speech rights by punishing him for his extracurricular activities.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/30/cop_fights_for_vampire_nudes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/30/cop_fights_for_vampire_nudes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
