<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > NYPD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/nypd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 02:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New York&#8217;s most persecuted subway artist?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/subway_artist_battles_the_mta_for_right_to_make_art_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/subway_artist_battles_the_mta_for_right_to_make_art_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hyperallergic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metro transit authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drawings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13301771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Enrico Miguel Thomas is taking legal action against the city after routine harassment at the hands of the MTA]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hyperallergic.com"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/hyperallergic-1.jpg" alt="Hyperallergic" /></a></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><span style="font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;">A few months ago, on a February evening in Grand Central, Brooklyn-based artist </span><a style="font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;" href="http://www.enricomiguelthomas.net/">Enrico Miguel Thomas</a><span style="font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;"> carried his drawing board a few paces away from where he had been set up, illustrating from a counter  — leaving behind a bag full of markers and a folded-up easel. After a brief moment of gathering the necessary detail on his subject, a process he characterizes as having taken no longer than five minutes, he turned to find a swarm of police officers gathering near his bags, which were less than ten feet away. After approaching the officers, claiming the bags, and identifying himself as an artist, the MTA police insisted on “clearing” his property with a K-9 bomb-sniffing dog.</span></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/subway_artist_battles_the_mta_for_right_to_make_art_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/subway_artist_battles_the_mta_for_right_to_make_art_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cop who killed unarmed Bronx teen walks free</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/cop_who_killed_unarmed_bronx_teen_walks_free/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/cop_who_killed_unarmed_bronx_teen_walks_free/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 13:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ramarley graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bronx]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13300275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Due to a procedural mistake, judge tosses case against NYPD officer who shot dead Ramarley Graham]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NYPD officer who shot dead Bronx teen Ramarley Graham walked free this week, as a judge dropped manslaughter charges against him due to procedural mistakes. Former officer Richard Haste shot the 18-year-old in his grandmother's bathroom. Initial police reports claiming the teen had a gun swiftly came under scrutiny when no weapons were found at the scene. Graham's death bolstered anti-NYPD sentiment in New York and added fervor to campaigns against stop-and-frisk practices.</p><p>However, as Ryan Devereaux reported for the Guardian, the case against Haste was dismissed as "Bronx supreme court justice Steven L Barrett said the Bronx district attorney's office failed to properly instruct members of a grand jury in considering allegations against officer Richard Haste for his role in the death."</p><p>Via <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/may/15/nypd-officer-teenager-bronx-ramarley-graham?INTCMP=SRCH">the Guardian:</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/cop_who_killed_unarmed_bronx_teen_walks_free/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/cop_who_killed_unarmed_bronx_teen_walks_free/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A crusading newspaper takes on the NYPD</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/a_crusading_newspaper_takes_on_the_nypd_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/a_crusading_newspaper_takes_on_the_nypd_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 18:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Crime Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bronx]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13297353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At question is whether cops should release granular crime data]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.thecrimereport.org/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/04/crime-report-logo.png" alt="The Crime Report" /></a>“It took all of two minutes to print out” sector-by-sector crime statistics the first time Bronx, NY journalist Alex Kratz asked Deputy Inspector James Alles of the New York Police Department (NYPD) for an in-depth readout of his precinct’s crime.</p><p>Kratz’s non-profit bi-weekly newspaper, the<em><a href="http://www.norwoodnews.org/" target="_blank">Norwood News</a></em>, used the information in February 2008 to publish maps and a series of stories that illustrated crime trends in specific neighborhoods within the paper’s coverage area—the north Bronx’s 52nd Precinct.</p><p>Reader response in the roughly 130,000-person precinct was overwhelmingly positive.</p><p>Until that point, few locals had seen crime statistics beyond the NYPD’s weekly COMPSTAT reports, which track precinct-wide major crime trends.</p><p>“Although I feel safe in my neighborhood, evidently our autos are targets,” one reader commented on the paper’s website.</p><p>“Is it possible to receive these reports on a sector basis each month?”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/a_crusading_newspaper_takes_on_the_nypd_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/a_crusading_newspaper_takes_on_the_nypd_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When drone strikes collide with stop-and-frisk</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/11/when_drone_strikes_collide_with_stop_and_frisk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/11/when_drone_strikes_collide_with_stop_and_frisk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterterror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biggest story you missed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radicalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rascism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disposition Matrix]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13295410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dispositions and watching for "weird behavior" increasingly guide both policing and national security policy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When NYPD officer Kha Dang took to the stand this week in the landmark federal trial challenging stop-and-frisk practices, he couldn't have known how revealing his testimony would be. Indeed, based on his comments, it's striking that that the police department would allow Dang -- a so-called stop-and-frisk "all star" for the large numbers of stops he carried out -- on the stand at all.</p><p>As Ryan Devereaux <a href="http://m.guardiannews.com/world/2013/may/09/nypd-stop-and-frisk-trial">reported for the Guardian</a>, in the third quarter of 2009 alone "Dang made a total of six arrests out of his 127 stops. He wrote one summons. He found contraband once. He never recovered any weapons and he only stopped people of color, primarily African Americans, 115 times to be exact. He never stopped a white person." Dang's record here is stunning enough alone. More telling still is the justifications he recounted to the court for making many of his stops, referring to repeated observation of individuals' general behavioral patterns, including "furtive movements" -- a vague policing phrase regularly stretched beyond the limits of all reasonableness. "We have a general idea of their behavior," Dang testified.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/11/when_drone_strikes_collide_with_stop_and_frisk/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/11/when_drone_strikes_collide_with_stop_and_frisk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Possible legal errors in Ramarley Graham case</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/possible_legal_errors_in_ramarley_graham_case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/possible_legal_errors_in_ramarley_graham_case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 14:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ramarley graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grand Jury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bronx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13293735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The presiding judge said he was "concerned" about information grand jurors received about police shooting of teen]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/may/08/ramarley-graham-judge-steven-barrett">Ryan Devereaux in the Guardian,</a> the judge presiding over the case against the police officer who shot dead Bronx teen Ramarley Graham is "officially concerned" that legal errors occurred prior to the indictment of former NYPD officer Richard Haste.</p><p>Judge Steven Barrett expressed concern having reviewed the minutes of the grand jury proceedings that led to Haste's indictment. In an incident that helped fuel widespread anti-NYPD sentiment and bolstered the movement challenging stop and frisk, Graham was shot dead in his grandmother's Bronx bathroom. Police reports that Graham had been armed were challenged when no weapon was found at the scene. Haste has pleaded not guilty to charges of first- and second-degree manslaughter.</p><p>As Devereaux reported, Judge Barrett's concern resides in the fact that grand jurors, who moved to indict Haste, "may have received erroneous instructions during their consideration of the case." Via the Guardian:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/possible_legal_errors_in_ramarley_graham_case/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/possible_legal_errors_in_ramarley_graham_case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Secrets of the NYPD</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/why_is_ray_kellys_schedule_more_secret_than_president_obamas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/why_is_ray_kellys_schedule_more_secret_than_president_obamas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 16:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray Kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[village voice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transparency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Police Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Information Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYCLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13292754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here's how a massive, taxpayer-funded public agency routinely ignores transparency laws]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New York Police Department has come under fire for the potentially unconstitutional execution of its stop-and-frisk policy, and surveillance of Muslims. But if you think that the taxpayer-funded agency should be accountable to the public and forthcoming about what it's doing, the story gets worse: It regularly flouts transparency laws, in an effort to make the records of how it perform its duties and the crimes it responds to next to impossible for the average citizen to obtain.</p><p>The NYPD’s roughly 34,500 officers serve a population of 8.2 million people, but multiple interviews with reporters who cover the police department, as well as organizations dedicated to transparency, reveal a police department stunning in its disregard for the information requests of citizens, advocacy groups and news organizations.</p><p>The city's Public Advocate Bill de Blasio, who is running for mayor, recently released a <a href="http://pubadvocate.nyc.gov/foil/report" target="_blank">report</a> asserting that a third of all Freedom of Information records requests to the police department were ignored. The numbers are no surprise to journalists who cover the department, such as Leonard Levitt, a veteran cops reporter who now writes at <a href="http://nypdconfidential.com/" target="_blank">NYPD Confidential</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/why_is_ray_kellys_schedule_more_secret_than_president_obamas/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/why_is_ray_kellys_schedule_more_secret_than_president_obamas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stop-and-frisk numbers are down&#8230; And so is crime</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/stop_and_frisk_numbers_down_and_so_is_crime/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/stop_and_frisk_numbers_down_and_so_is_crime/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 13:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray Kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13291597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New figures challenge claims by Bloomberg and NYPD chief that the tactic is a necessary crime-stopper]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the NYPD's stop-and-frisk tactic continues <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/momentum_surges_for_police_reform/">to be challenged</a> in a landmark federal court case, new statistics suggest that the controversial and racially skewed practice may not even serve to lower crime rates. According to new figures released by the NYPD, flagged by the<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323372504578467361507997492.html?mod=WSJ_LatestHeadlines"> Wall Street Journal</a>, the number of stop-and-frisk reports filed by New York City police fell by just over 50 percent in the first three months of this year compared with the same period last year. Meanwhile, WSJ notes "overall crime is also down 2.7 percent this year through April 28 with murders leading the way with a 30% decline compared with the same period last year, police data show."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/stop_and_frisk_numbers_down_and_so_is_crime/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/stop_and_frisk_numbers_down_and_so_is_crime/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NYPD&#8217;s Ray Kelly: Blacks &#8220;understopped&#8221; by police</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/ny_police_commissioner_blacks_understopped_by_police/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/ny_police_commissioner_blacks_understopped_by_police/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 15:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray Kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In line with Mayor Bloomberg, Ray Kelly defends the NYPD's racially skewed, controversial stop-and-frisk practices]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Echoing what Joan Walsh called Mayor Bloomberg's <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/mike_bloombergs_ugly_stop_and_frisk_freakout/">"ugly" defense </a>of the NYPD's stop-and-frisk practice, police commissioner Ray Kelly asserted Wednesday night that African Americans are "understopped" by police. During an <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/video/nypds-stop-frisk-racial-profiling-proactive-policing-19088868">interview with ABC</a>, the commissioner and the policing tactic's greatest defender, said that "African Americans are being understopped in relation to people being described as perpetrators of violent crime."</p><p>While Mayor Bloomberg has been mayor, the NYPD has carried out over<a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/nypd_make_5_millionth_stop_and_frisk_under_bloomberg/"> 5 million stop-and-frisks.</a> Analysis by the ACLU of official police data found that over 86 percent of the stops were of black or Latino individuals. The analysis of police data also revealed that 88 percent of the stops did not result in an arrest or summons (and of course an even smaller proportion ever lead to a prosecution, or conviction). The number of innocent people stopped alone serves as ample riposte to Kelly's suggestion that any demographic is "understopped."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/ny_police_commissioner_blacks_understopped_by_police/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/ny_police_commissioner_blacks_understopped_by_police/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mike Bloomberg&#8217;s ugly &#8220;stop and frisk&#8221; freakout</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/mike_bloombergs_ugly_stop_and_frisk_freakout/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/mike_bloombergs_ugly_stop_and_frisk_freakout/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 18:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raymond Kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13285860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He equates the NYCLU with the NRA, race-baits the New York Times and lets the NYPD profile blacks and Muslims]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/08/03/mayor_bloomberg_on_mosque/">One of New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s finest moments</a>, at least until his recent all-out advocacy for gun control, was when he choked up during a moving speech defending the development of the so-called Ground Zero Mosque in 2010. Remember that? Republicans were making it a big campaign issue, even President Obama took his time before kinda-sorta defending it, but Bloomberg made a big speech in front of the Statue of Liberty and defended the fundamental American right of New York Muslims to build a community center where they wanted it.</p><blockquote><p>This nation was founded on the principle that the government must never choose between religions or favor one over another. The World Trade Center site will forever hold a special place in our city, in our hearts. But we would be untrue to the best part of ourselves and who we are as New Yorkers and Americans if we said no to a mosque in lower Manhattan.</p> <p>Let us not forget that Muslims were among those murdered on 9/11, and that our Muslim neighbors grieved with us as New Yorkers and as Americans. We would betray our values and play into our enemies’ hands if we were to treat Muslims differently than anyone else. In fact, to cave to popular sentiment would be to hand a victory to the terrorists, and we should not stand for that.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/mike_bloombergs_ugly_stop_and_frisk_freakout/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/mike_bloombergs_ugly_stop_and_frisk_freakout/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>98</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vast majority of New Yorkers want more NYPD oversight</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/vast_majority_of_new_yorkers_want_more_nypd_oversight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/vast_majority_of_new_yorkers_want_more_nypd_oversight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 14:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inspector general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quinnipiac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13267906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New poll finds support for inspector general position particularly high among black and Latino voters]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new Quinnipiac University poll <a href="http://www.quinnipiac.edu/institutes--centers/polling-institute/new-york-city/release-detail?ReleaseID=1880">has found</a> that a vast majority of New York voters support the establishment of an independent inspector general to monitor the NYPD. In light of an <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/stop_and_frisk_goes_on_trial/">ongoing landmark federal lawsuit </a>(and growing public outcry) over the police department's use of stop-and-frisk tactics that disproportionately target and harass young black and Latino men in New York, calls for greater oversight have amplified in recent months. Via Quinnipiac:</p><blockquote><p>New York City voters, by a substantial 66 - 25 percent margin, support creating the position of inspector general to independently monitor the Police Department... Support ranges from 53 - 38 percent among white voters to 77 - 13 percent among Hispanic voters and 78 - 13 percent among black voters, the independent Quinnipiac University poll finds... Support is 51 - 42 percent among Republicans and 55 - 35 percent among voters over 55 years old. Voters in every other political, gender, age and income groups support the NYPD inspector general idea by 60 percent or more.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/vast_majority_of_new_yorkers_want_more_nypd_oversight/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/vast_majority_of_new_yorkers_want_more_nypd_oversight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NYPD cops allegedly pepper-sprayed a baby</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/nypd_cops_allegedly_pepper_sprayed_a_toddler/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/nypd_cops_allegedly_pepper_sprayed_a_toddler/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bronx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pepper-spray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police brutality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13259011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A lawsuit claims officer on subway platform pepper-sprayed a mother, father and their three small children]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to allegations in a lawsuit filed last month against the NYPD, there may be some new <a href="http://peppersprayingcop.tumblr.com/">Pepper Spray Cops </a>in town. <a href="http://gothamist.com/2013/04/02/nypd_cop_allegedly_pepper_sprayed_s.php">As Gothamist reported</a>, a Bronx woman has claimed that three NYPD officers used excessive force when an officer "needlessly and without warning pepper-sprayed a mother, father, and their three small children," as the lawsuit alleges. According to the lawsuit, the cops approached the woman, suspecting her of having evaded a fare when using the service entrance to reach the platform with her stroller. The lawsuit claims that an officer sprayed the woman and her children when she bent down to reassure one of them during the police stop. Via Gothamist:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/nypd_cops_allegedly_pepper_sprayed_a_toddler/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/nypd_cops_allegedly_pepper_sprayed_a_toddler/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NYPD&#8217;s Ray Kelly wanted to &#8220;instill fear&#8221; in minority youth</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/nypds_ray_kelly_wanted_to_instill_fear_in_minority_youth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/nypds_ray_kelly_wanted_to_instill_fear_in_minority_youth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 11:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray Kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[floyd vs. city of new york]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13258628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The testimony of a New York state senator in landmark trial reveals the commissioner's stop-and-frisk intentions]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the latest striking revelation about the internal mechanisms of the NYPD's stop-and-frisk practices, a New York state senator testified that police commissioner Ray Kelly once said he intended to "instill fear" in black and Latino young men with the controversial tactic.</p><p>State Sen. Eric Adams, a retired NYPD captain, took the stand Monday in <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/momentum_surges_for_police_reform/">the landmark Floyd vs. City of New York federal trial, </a>which challenges the constitutionality of the<a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/nypd_make_5_millionth_stop_and_frisk_under_bloomberg/"> racially skewed</a> stop-and-frisk tactic. Adams told the court about a 2010 meeting between Kelly and New York's then-Gov. David Patterson. Adams, also present at the meeting, testified that the commissioner had expressly stated that black and Latino men should be targeted in police stops. Kelly, according to the city's attorney, has flatly denied making such claims.</p><p>Ryan Devereaux <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/apr/01/nypd-ray-kelly-instil-fear">reported </a>for the Guardian:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/nypds_ray_kelly_wanted_to_instill_fear_in_minority_youth/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/nypds_ray_kelly_wanted_to_instill_fear_in_minority_youth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Suddenly, NYPD doesn&#8217;t love surveillance anymore</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/big_brother_is_a_big_hypocrite/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/big_brother_is_a_big_hypocrite/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray Kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inspector general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13258140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Law enforcement agencies monitor our most basic acts. But try assigning them a watchdog and they resist with fury]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Big Brother theory of surveillance goes something like this: pervasive snooping and monitoring shouldn't frighten innocent people, it should only make lawbreakers nervous because they are the only ones with something to hide. Those who subscribe to this theory additionally argue that the widespread awareness of such surveillance creates a permanent preemptive deterrent to such lawbreaking ever happening in the first place.</p><p>I don't personally agree that this logic is a convincing justification for the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/12/what_does_a_police_state_look_like/">American Police State</a>, and when I hear such arguments, I inevitably find myself confused by the contradiction of police-state proponents proposing to curtail freedom in order to protect it. But whether or not you subscribe to the police-state tautology, you have to admit there is more than a bit of hypocrisy at work when those who forward the Big Brother logic simultaneously insist such logic shouldn't apply to them or the governmental agencies they oversee.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/big_brother_is_a_big_hypocrite/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/02/big_brother_is_a_big_hypocrite/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Forget Bloomberg&#8217;s nanny state</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/forget_bloombergs_nanny_state/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/forget_bloombergs_nanny_state/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Police Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray Kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police commissioner ray kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13253675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's his approach to public safety that's the bigger danger to our freedoms]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have seen it with my own eyes, and heard the stories of cousins, brothers and friends. Innocent of crime, guilty of no infraction, they are harassed, placed against walls, handcuffed, sometimes released, sometimes incited -- but never respected. For many African-American citizens of New York City, there is an axiomatic truth that the New York Police Department neither <em>serves</em> nor <em>protects</em> them.</p><p>This month, NYPD's controversial stop-and-frisk policy -- which entails officers regularly stopping predominantly black and Latino men and frisking them for weapons and drugs -- went on trial in federal Court. The class-action lawsuit, Floyd v. City of New York, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/23/opinion/walking-while-black-in-new-york.html">challenges the NYPD policy</a> on the basis that it violates the Constitution's Equal Protection Clause, and the Fourth Amendment's prohibition against unreasonable search and seizure. According to the Center for Constitutional Rights, the NYPD's own data show hundreds of thousands of unconstitutional stops in the past three years alone, and expert <a href="http://dailykos.com/story/2013/03/24/1196149/-Stop-and-frisk-on-trial">analysis of their data</a> -- controlling for crime, neighborhood and patterns of police deployment -- has found that the mitigating factor in NYPD stops is race.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/forget_bloombergs_nanny_state/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/forget_bloombergs_nanny_state/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is it time for the NYPD to investigate bike accidents?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/30/its_time_for_the_nypd_to_investigate_bike_accidents_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/30/its_time_for_the_nypd_to_investigate_bike_accidents_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Business Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bicycles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motor accidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investigations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13255811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cyclists and pedestrians are posting their living wills online in an effort to shed light on traffic violence]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="www.outsports.com"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/03/logo_300x501-e1364224707606.png" alt="International Business Times" align="left" /></a></p><p>If you knew you were going to be struck and killed by a car in New York City this year, would you trust New York’s Finest to get to the bottom of things? If not, you’re not alone.</p><p>Time’s Up, a New York City environmental group, is collecting online living wills from cyclists and pedestrians who are asking the New York Police Department to conduct full investigations in the event that they killed by a motorist. The <a href="http://mylivingstreetwill.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">project</a>, dubbed “My Living Street Will,” was launched on March 19 and is hosting a growing number of statements from everyday New Yorkers who navigate the city’s streets on two wheels or two feet.</p><p>Keegan Stephan, a Brooklyn-based cyclist and Time’s Up volunteer, said the idea grew out of a planning meeting in which he and other volunteers were trying to figure out ways to increase awareness about the dangers faced by cyclists and pedestrians.</p><div> <p>“We really just want New Yorkers to wake up to traffic violence,” he said.</p> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/30/its_time_for_the_nypd_to_investigate_bike_accidents_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/30/its_time_for_the_nypd_to_investigate_bike_accidents_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NYPD taunted crying 13-year-old during stop</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/28/nypd_taunted_crying_13_year_old_during_stop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/28/nypd_taunted_crying_13_year_old_during_stop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 12:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[floyd vs. city of new york]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13254467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More indicting details arise in the landmark trial challenging police practices]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the second week of the landmark Floyd v. City of New York trial, witness testimony has revealed more indicting details about the NYPD's stop-and-frisk practices. Appearing on the stand Wednesday, police officer Brian Dennis<a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/nypd-admits-taunted-innocent-teen-stop-frisk-article-1.1300447"> testified</a> that he had taunted a 13-year-old boy after he detained him. Dennis told the handcuffed child, Devin Almonor, to "stop crying like a little girl."</p><p>The teen was reportedly stopped on the street in Harlem when he reached into his pants' waistband. The two officers that stopped him claimed to have been searching for a firearm, but Almonor was found to be carrying no weapons. He was nonetheless handcuffed, taunted and taken to the stationhouse.</p><p>Meanwhile, as Ryan Devereaux reported for <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/mar/27/nypd-stop-and-frisk-memo?CMP=twt_fd&amp;CMP=SOCxx2I2">the Guardian</a>, an internal NYPD memo sent to commanding officers earlier this month "amounts to an admission that the [stop-and-frisk] program is deeply flawed. The Center for Constitutional Rights, which brought the class action lawsuit against the city, objected to the memo being entered into evidence. The group argued that civil rights groups have been pushing for police to issue such directives for years; the release of such a memo on the eve of the landmark trial has thus raised some eyebrows. Via Devereaux:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/28/nypd_taunted_crying_13_year_old_during_stop/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/28/nypd_taunted_crying_13_year_old_during_stop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>David Gregory irate about soda, meh on civil rights</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/does_tv_news_care_more_about_soda_than_civil_rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/does_tv_news_care_more_about_soda_than_civil_rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 13:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jake Tapper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meet the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Letterman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Late Show With David Letterman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13250760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In national interviews, Mayor Bloomberg gets grilled about beverage sizes. His stop-and-frisk policy? Not so much]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In New York City, Mayor Michael Bloomberg's NYPD is stopping large numbers of innocent people walking down the street each day -- questioning them as to their whereabouts and invasively frisking their bodies in a hunt for weapons and drugs. The stops are almost entirely (<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/23/nyregion/fighting-stop-and-frisk-tactic-but-hitting-racial-divide.html?_r=0">nearly nine in 10</a>) targeting young black and Latino men. The overwhelming majority of those stopped are doing nothing wrong (just <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/09/opinion/stop-and-frisk-in-new-york-city.html">6 percent of stops lead to arrests</a>, and a small fraction of those <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/26/nyregion/in-the-bronx-resistance-to-prosecuting-stop-and-frisk-arrests.html?pagewanted=all">are ever prosecuted</a>). And it's having a deleterious effect on the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/video/2012/06/12/opinion/100000001601732/the-scars-of-stop-and-frisk.html">psyche of the targets</a> (as well as <a href="http://colorlines.com/archives/2013/03/heres_why_new_york_citys_stop-and-frisk_trial_is_really_important.html">community relations with police)</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/does_tv_news_care_more_about_soda_than_civil_rights/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/does_tv_news_care_more_about_soda_than_civil_rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Sunday Shows take on guns and gays</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/the_sunday_shows_take_on_guns_and_gays/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/the_sunday_shows_take_on_guns_and_gays/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2013 20:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Sunday Shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Brooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david gregory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meet the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[face the nation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13250580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today. more Iraq War salesmen hype the Iran threat and David Gregory stands up for the right to drink soda]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One interesting thing I've noted since I started watching the mostly wretched Sunday shows is that for the most part there is not much debate, between the liberal and conservative panel mainstays, on gay marriage. Everyone is in favor of it or not inclined to strongly oppose it. So in order to have a proper right-vs-left Sunday Show Debate on the matter, two of the shows today were forced to bring in outspoken bigots. National embarrassments Tony Perkins and Ralph Reed both gamely answered the call, and defended "traditional marriage" from the inevitable march of widespread acceptance of gays and lesbians.</p><p>First, though, ABC's "This Week," the only one of the big three shows this morning to have another idiotic debate about budgets, began with George Stephanopoulos actually bragging -- bragging! -- that he had both Jim Messina <em>and</em> Karl Rove. Oh boy, two campaign strategists! When I am looking for well-considered and thoughtful commentary on national issues, I always turn to people who are good at managing political campaigns.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/the_sunday_shows_take_on_guns_and_gays/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/the_sunday_shows_take_on_guns_and_gays/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Second cop confirms NYPD arrest quotas</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/second_cop_confirms_nypd_arrest_quotas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/second_cop_confirms_nypd_arrest_quotas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 18:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arrest quotas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[floyd vs. city of new york]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13248178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two officers this week have taken stand in landmark stop-and-frisk trial to speak on illegal quota system]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/momentum_surges_for_police_reform/">noted here</a> earlier this week, suspended NYPD officer Adhyl Polanco testified Tuesday in the landmark <em>Floyd vs. City of New York</em> trial that his supervisors pushed quotas for stop-and-frisk searches and arrests. Polanco's statements came the same day that an audio recording, leaked to The Nation, revealed that the police union colluded with NYPD on setting a monthly quota of 20 summonses and one arrest per officer. While the NYPD has denied operating a quota system -- which would be illegal -- yet another cop has come forward to testify that quotas are very much at work. Via <a href="http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/03/21/second-new-york-cop-confirms-illegal-quota-system/">Raw Story:</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/second_cop_confirms_nypd_arrest_quotas/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/second_cop_confirms_nypd_arrest_quotas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Momentum surges for police reform</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/momentum_surges_for_police_reform/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/momentum_surges_for_police_reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 16:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Mayor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stop-and-frisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arrest quotas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inspector general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13246772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NYC politicians push for a police watchdog. A federal judge examines stop and frisk. Dramatic change may be coming]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NYPD is currently on trial in more ways than one. While<a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/stop_and_frisk_goes_on_trial/"> a federal judge presides over a landmark case </a>challenging the constitutionality of the police department's stop-and-frisk tactic, political will is growing to ban the racially divisive policing practices and to increase oversight on NYPD behavior. From the streets of <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/anger_at_nypd_after_shooting_of_16_year_old_boils_over_in_streets/">East Flatbush</a> to the forums of mayoral debates, momentum is growing to challenge the NYPD as it currently operates.</p><p>While Mayor Bloomberg's administration has long maintained that independent oversight of the NYPD is not necessary, his ally, City Council Speaker (and mayoral candidate) Christine Quinn announced Tuesday that lawmakers had reached a deal to install an inspector general to monitor the vast police department. The call for an inspector general, who could have investigative powers and the ability to issue subpoenas, followed mounting evidence of widespread discriminatory policing, both in the form of stop-and-frisks (over 86 percent of which target black and Latino New Yorkers) and the NYPD's spying on Muslim communities. For a careful politician like Quinn to support such a proposal reflects a shifting political tide towards reform.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/momentum_surges_for_police_reform/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/momentum_surges_for_police_reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
