<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Obamacare</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/obamacare/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>White House delays key component of healthcare overhaul</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/white_house_delays_key_component_of_health_care_overhaul_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/white_house_delays_key_component_of_health_care_overhaul_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 22:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treasury Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13358246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Administration officials will grant medium and large companies another year to comply with coverage requirements]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — The Obama administration says it's delaying a major part of the president's health care overhaul law, the requirement that medium and large companies offer coverage.</p><p>In an announcement late Tuesday from the Treasury Department, the administration said it has heard requests from business groups for additional time to comply and will grant another year.</p><p>The health law requires companies with 50 or more workers to offer affordable coverage to their employees or face potentially large fines if just one worker ends up getting taxpayer-subsidized insurance.</p><p><img class="fiveminVideoPlayer" style="width: 570px; height: 411px; display: block;" src="https://spthumbnails.5min.com/10355530/517776490_3_570_411.jpg" alt="Obama Promotes Health Care Exchanges At White House" data-product="playerSeed" data-params="playList=517776490|||height=411|||width=570|||sid=1236|||origin=fts|||relatedMode=2|||relatedBottomHeight=60|||companionPos=|||hasCompanion=false|||autoStart=false|||colorPallet=%23FF0000|||videoControlDisplayColor=%23191919|||shuffle=0|||isAP=1" /></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/white_house_delays_key_component_of_health_care_overhaul_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/white_house_delays_key_component_of_health_care_overhaul_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Watch Bill O&#8217;Reilly freak out over the gay marriage rulings</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/watch_bill_oreilly_freak_out_over_the_gay_marriage_rulings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/watch_bill_oreilly_freak_out_over_the_gay_marriage_rulings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 15:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Juan Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Roberts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DoMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposition 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13349610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court has "morphed into a political organization," O'Reilly argued]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fox News host Bill O'Reilly was not too happy about the Supreme Court's rulings on DOMA and Proposition 8 (and, for that matter, Obamacare), railing against how "the Supreme Court has put aside its mandate to uphold the Constitution," and has "morphed into a political organization," finding "loopholes" in the Prop 8 and Obamacare cases to get the desired result.</p><p>O'Reilly got particularly angry when talking with Fox News analyst Juan Williams, calling Chief Justice John Roberts' opinion that the backers of Proposition 8 had no standing to appeal the case "just absurd."</p><p>Williams argued that in cases like Prop 8 and Obamacare, Roberts "made a decision based on what he thought was in the political best interest of the Court."</p><p>"That's not his job!" O'Reilly exploded. "That's not his job, Juan!"</p><p>Here's the video. The interview with Williams begins at around 4:25:</p><p><iframe src="//www.youtube.com/embed/Z-misX9BwvY" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/watch_bill_oreilly_freak_out_over_the_gay_marriage_rulings/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/watch_bill_oreilly_freak_out_over_the_gay_marriage_rulings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP&#8217;s dumb new Obama scandal: He&#8217;s destroying NFL!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/new_gop_paranoia_obama_will_destroy_nfl/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/new_gop_paranoia_obama_will_destroy_nfl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13336183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The nuts are back with another huge scandal: Advertising on Obamacare during football games will ruin America]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's just one scandal after another with this administration. Did you see that it is now trying to <em>destroy the NFL</em>? This is what's happening, according to certain quarters of the Internet. Here's the skinny: <a href="http://www.kaiserhealthnews.org/stories/2013/june/24/sebelius-in-talks-with-nfl-on-obamacare-promotion.aspx">The Health and Human Services department is</a> "in talks with the National Football League to promote [Obamacare]’s insurance marketplaces that begin enrolling people Oct 1." Who knows how deep this corruption goes -- HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius <em>also</em> "said the administration is also talking to other major sports franchises about improving public awareness of the Obamacare online insurance exchanges."</p><p>Kaiser Health's story also notes that during the media push for Massachusetts' similar healthcare law, "the campaign was advertised <a href="http://boston.redsox.mlb.com/news/press_releases/press_release.jsp?ymd=20070522&amp;content_id=1979252&amp;vkey=pr_bos&amp;fext=.jsp&amp;c_id=bos">during Red Sox games at Fenway Park</a>. That marketing is widely credited with helping build public acceptance." Once again in the healthcare field, the federal government is just following Mitt Romney's lead.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/new_gop_paranoia_obama_will_destroy_nfl/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/new_gop_paranoia_obama_will_destroy_nfl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 companies that shamelessly tried to duck Obamacare</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/10_companies_that_threatened_to_cut_worker_hours_to_avoid_obamacare_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/10_companies_that_threatened_to_cut_worker_hours_to_avoid_obamacare_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 16:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darden Restaurants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denny's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimmy John's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AAA Parking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Papa John's]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13335393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These organizations threatened to cut work hours to avoid government requirements. See how many followed through]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the runup to the 2012 general election, some business leaders were feeling antsy. “Everyone’s looking for a way to not have to provide insurance for their employees<strong>,”</strong>said John Metz, who is an owner of at least 45 fast food restaurants, <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/health/2012/11/15/1197431/dennys-obamacare/" target="_blank">in a Fox News</a> interview soon after President Barack Obama’s re-election. “It’s essentially a huge tax on all us business people.”</p><p>During and immediately after the election many employers in the low-income service sector warned about dire effects the Affordable Care Act would have on employment and prices. The jerry-rigged, patchwork healthcare reform Obamacare tries to mend America’s long-standing coverage gaps with a variety of tools, including expanding Medicaid, establishing state-based exchanges supported by public assistance, and granting small businesses (25 or fewer employees) subsidies to provide insurance for their employees. But larger businesses (50 employees or more) are incentivized to provide coverage with a stick: Pay a $2,000 fine per employee who works more than 30 hours and lacks insurance.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/10_companies_that_threatened_to_cut_worker_hours_to_avoid_obamacare_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/10_companies_that_threatened_to_cut_worker_hours_to_avoid_obamacare_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America&#8217;s scariest doctors</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/meet_the_gops_quack_caucus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/meet_the_gops_quack_caucus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 17:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doctors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phil Gingrey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Broun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott DesJarlais]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13331810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meet the GOP Doctors Caucus -- where one member's diagnosis of fetal masturbation is just the tip of the iceberg]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The phrase "fetal masturbation" made an unlikely appearance in the political discourse <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/gop_lawmaker_extreme_abortion_ban_justified_because_of_masturbating_fetuses/singleton/">Wednesday</a>, thanks to a Republican congressman who said the country needs a 20-week abortion ban because he's seen sonograms that show male fetuses "feel pleasure" when they "have their hand between their legs."</p><p>The science on whether fetuses can feel pain (let alone masturbate) is <a href="http://rhrealitycheck.org/article/2013/06/17/texas-congressman-masturbating-fetuses-prove-need-for-abortion-ban/">pretty dubious</a>, which is something one might expect the congressman, Texas Rep. Michael Burgess, to know, considering the fact that he's an OB-GYN and a proud member of the <a href="http://doctorscaucus.gingrey.house.gov/whoweare/">GOP Doctors Caucus</a>. But a look at the caucus's roster reveals he has plenty of company from other lawmakers with controversial thoughts on science and women's health.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/meet_the_gops_quack_caucus/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/meet_the_gops_quack_caucus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll: Dems like &#8220;Obamacare&#8221; more than &#8220;health reform law&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/poll_dems_like_obamacare_more_than_health_care_law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/poll_dems_like_obamacare_more_than_health_care_law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13331123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Democrats have a more favorable view of the healthcare law when it's referred to as "Obamacare"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new survey from the Kaiser Family Foundation finds that Democrats have a more favorable opinion of the Affordable Care Act when it's referred to as "Obamacare" than when it's referred to as the "health reform law."</p><p>From <a href="http://kff.org/health-reform/poll-finding/kaiser-health-tracking-poll-june-2013/">Kaiser</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Although nearly a quarter of Americans say they don’t know their view on the “health reform law”, the public is more opinionated when asked about “Obamacare”: the share offering no opinion drops to 11 percent, and the shares expressing both favorable and unfavorable views of the law rise when this term is used. Democrats show the biggest change in favorability with the alternate question wording – 73 percent say they have a favorable opinion of “Obamacare” compared to 58 percent who say the same for the “health reform law.”</p></blockquote><p>Overall, 35 percent of the public said they have favorable view of the "health reform law" and 42 percent had a favorable view of "Obamacare." The inverse had the same effect, though, with 43 percent saying they have an unfavorable view of the "health reform law" and 47 percent saying they have an unfavorable opinion of "Obamacare."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/poll_dems_like_obamacare_more_than_health_care_law/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/poll_dems_like_obamacare_more_than_health_care_law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Obamacare shortchanges low-wage workers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/how_obamacare_will_affect_the_lowest_paid_workers_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/how_obamacare_will_affect_the_lowest_paid_workers_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 22:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Next New Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care A]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13330118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Affordable Care Act will benefit millions of low-income employees -- except those working for big businesses]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nextnewdeal.net/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/04/next-new-deal-logo_resize.png" alt="Next New Deal" align="left" /></a> One of the biggest issues that the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is meant to tackle is the lack of health coverage among low-wage workers. While there is good news for many low-wage workers in the new law, many others will still find themselves locked out of access to affordable coverage. Solving their concerns will be one more part of the huge challenge of confronting the power of mammoth low-wage employers in the new economy.</p><p>There has been a lot of coverage about the potential for fast food chains and other employers to cut the hours of some of their employees to under 30 a week in order to avoid having to offer them health coverage. To the extent that employers do cut back hours, it will accelerate a long-trend toward part-time low wage work; <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/healthwatch/health-insurance/301343-trend-toward-part-time-work-cuts-in-health-coverage-predate-obamacare#ixzz2U2wiYm44">part-timers increased from 17 percent to 22 percent</a> of the workforce just from 2007 to 2011.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/how_obamacare_will_affect_the_lowest_paid_workers_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/how_obamacare_will_affect_the_lowest_paid_workers_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paul Ryan claims Obamacare will force churches to cover abortions</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/paul_ryan_claims_obamacare_will_force_churches_to_provide_abortions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/paul_ryan_claims_obamacare_will_force_churches_to_provide_abortions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birth Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social conservatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13326369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former vice presidential candidate throws factless fearmongering red meat to social conservatives]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking at a conference of social conservatives in Washington today, Rep. Paul Ryan decried what he saw as the Obama administration's assault on religious freedom, falsely saying that Obamacare will force churches to provide healthcare for employees that covers abortion drugs.</p><p>"Take a look at what's going on with the HHS mandate," Ryan told the Faith and Freedom Coalition's Road to the Majority Conference this morning. "Obamacare says that if you believe in the social teaching of your church, if you disagree with abortifacients -- with abortion inducing drugs -- it doesn't matter. You, if you're a church or a charity or a hospital, you have to buy health insurance that offers your employees these things that are in contradiction to your beliefs. This is what the federal government is demanding."</p><p>Last year, this issue exploded on the right when the Department of Health and Human Services released draft guidelines that would require most employers to provide health insurance that covers birth control without co-pays. But the rules made specific exemptions for religious employers like churches, and under pressure from the Catholic Church and others, the administration <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/02/us/politics/white-house-proposes-compromise-on-contraception-coverage.html?pagewanted=all&amp;_r=0">reviewed the rules and added exceptions</a> to allay concerns.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/paul_ryan_claims_obamacare_will_force_churches_to_provide_abortions/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/paul_ryan_claims_obamacare_will_force_churches_to_provide_abortions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>107</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Tea Party hates Jan Brewer now</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/06/the_tea_party_hates_jan_brewer_now/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/06/the_tea_party_hates_jan_brewer_now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 15:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jan Brewer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicaid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13318319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["She is George Bush in a skirt!" a top Arizona Republican angrily declares. How it all went downhill so suddenly]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Arizona this week, black is white, up is down, left is right and Gov. Jan Brewer is getting <a href="https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?id=116437529869&amp;story_fbid=10151590798079870">praised by gay Democrats</a> and slammed by Tea Party conservatives.</p><p>The governor made a name for herself on Fox News and at national gatherings of conservatives like CPAC as a kind of uber-Tea Partyer, who <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Scorpions-Breakfast-Interests-Politicos-Americas/dp/0062106392">eats scorpions for breakfast</a>, <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/chilly-reception-obama-lands-in-phoenix-has-words-with-gop-governor/">wags her finger in the president's face</a> at lunchtime, signs <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/jan-brewer-jesus-got-me-here">strict anti-immigration bills into law</a> in the afternoon, and gives the Tea Party flag the <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2011/04/19/159771/jan-brewer-tea-party-flag/">same legal protections</a> as the Star-Spangled Banner by bedtime.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/06/the_tea_party_hates_jan_brewer_now/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/06/the_tea_party_hates_jan_brewer_now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How liberals saved California</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/how_liberals_saved_california/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/how_liberals_saved_california/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 17:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jerry brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austerity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Atlantic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dental Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13313961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It wasn’t Jerry Brown’s austerity that led the fiscal comeback. It was the state’s smart, bold progressive movement]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week, the Atlantic’s James Fallows penned what has almost become its own genre, a glorifying profile of <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2013/06/the-fixer/309324/">California Gov. Jerry Brown</a>, positioning him as the savior of the Golden State, single-handedly bringing it back from fiscal collapse. Brown, the story goes, stepped away from his “Governor Moonbeam” past and embraced a new practicality. “I find that a lot of people are more invested in position-taking than they are in the inquiry,” Brown says to Fallows, an expression of his philosophy. “Generally speaking, I am<em> in the inquiry</em>.”</p><p>It’s a nice sentiment. It’s also wrong. No politician in California is more invested than Brown in taking a very specific position – demanding restraint in allocating post-recession surpluses to attend to human needs. This pro-austerity pose, a defining characteristic of Brown’s entire political career, now threatens the pace of recovery in the nation’s largest state, the perception of the federal healthcare overhaul, and the lives of hundreds of thousands of Californians.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/how_liberals_saved_california/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/how_liberals_saved_california/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>382</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why are Democrats so averse to conflict?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/why_are_dems_so_averse_to_conflict_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/why_are_dems_so_averse_to_conflict_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 18:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacobin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[left-wing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13311098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If they have any hope of regulating Wall Street or preserving Obamacare, liberals need to get down and dirty]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jacobinmag.com"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/Jacobin.jpg" alt="Jacobin" /></a>I’ve never been in a real-deal, legit fight. I’ve seen a few, but I’ve never been in one myself. The ones I was witness to didn’t look particularly enjoyable, though, so it’s not like I look back regretfully on all those times I could’ve punched someone in the head. I long ago learned that I would have to make peace with my pacific nature.</p><p>All of this is to say, I empathize with the urge to duck a fight. They’re ugly things, fights. But despite what you’ve heard, there’s the personal and then there’s the political, and they’re not always one in the same. A conflict-averse person is OK; a conflict-averse politics is not.</p><p>Take Obamacare, for example. With its full implementation inching ever closer to the here and now, there’s a rising chorus of anxiety on the Left, and glee on the right, over what’s looking like a rocky transition. Time will tell, of course, but if these fears prove justified, the Democrats’ recurrent fear of conflict will be in large part to blame.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/why_are_dems_so_averse_to_conflict_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/why_are_dems_so_averse_to_conflict_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>He predicted today’s GOP… in 1895</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/he_predicted_today%e2%80%99s_gop%e2%80%a6_in_1895/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/he_predicted_today%e2%80%99s_gop%e2%80%a6_in_1895/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Sanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Cruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Kerry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13311430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Folksy evangelical Sam P. Jones warned of “scandalmongers” who “feed on human character and soiled reputation”]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam P. Jones was an influential southern evangelical at the end of the 19th century, and one of his pieces in June 1895, published in the Biloxi Herald, was titled “Scandalmongers.” In his folksy style, Jones categorized three types: “the cowardly scandalmonger, who by innuendo drives his thrust and probes with his bill”; “the talkers of a community. Their tongues are ten feet thick and a thousand miles long”; and finally, those who “sit in the sanctum of newspaper offices, and wield a pen dipped in gall.” Altogether, these various scandalmongers were “vultures which feed on human character and soiled reputation…. Taste for tainted meat can be cultivated until it is more desired than fresh meat.”</p><p>Seizing on the Benghazi tragedy, IRS probe, and whatever else they can get their claws into, today’s Republicans on Capitol Hill and the outraged echo chamber at Fox News are vultures of the breed Sam P. Jones saw in the political world of his day. The fresh meat they have no taste for is what we might call productive reform legislation, which their diversionary tactics prevent from being put front and center. The vultures feed instead on rotten issues like abortion (how many babies did Planned Parenthood kill today?) or dismantling Obamacare before it can do good, put government in a positive light, and lead to further reform of a system that is stacked in favor of private insurance companies.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/he_predicted_today%e2%80%99s_gop%e2%80%a6_in_1895/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/he_predicted_today%e2%80%99s_gop%e2%80%a6_in_1895/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll: Americans still oppose Obamacare</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/28/poll_americans_still_oppose_obamacare/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/28/poll_americans_still_oppose_obamacare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 12:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13310718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[54 percent say they still oppose the Affordable Care Act]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new poll from CNN/ORC International finds that 54 percent of Americans still oppose the Affordable Care Act, while 43 percent say they support it. But, according to the poll, a chunk of those who say they oppose the law think it didn't go far enough.</p><p>From <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/05/27/poll-do-you-support-or-oppose-the-health-care-law/">CNN</a>:</p><blockquote><p>The survey indicates that 35% oppose the health care law because it's too liberal, with 16% saying they oppose the measure because it isn't liberal enough.</p> <p>The wide partisan divide over the law remains. Nearly three quarters of Democrats say they favor the Affordable Care Act. That number drops to 16% among Republicans.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/28/poll_americans_still_oppose_obamacare/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/28/poll_americans_still_oppose_obamacare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How policy nihilists in the Senate doomed LGBT immigrants</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/why_democrats_abandoned_lgbt_immigrants/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/why_democrats_abandoned_lgbt_immigrants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrick J. Leahy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsey Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Cruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Blumenthal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13305411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Same-sex couples lose in Senate immigration reform fight, as Democrats pander to cynical Lindsey Graham]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The immigration bill crafted by the Senate "Gang of Eight" passed the Senate Judiciary Committee Tuesday evening, with a 13-5 vote. Every senator involved in the markup session leading up to the vote was very proud of him- or herself for how great the markup session was going. Especially after the senators bravely shot down a proposal to recognize the marriages of LGBT immigrants.</p><p>It was a very self-congratulatory affair, as each senator congratulated every other senator for their great legislative skill, their deeply held principles and their impressive civility. The markup deliberations were "courageous," Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., said, in reference to a bunch of people, mostly old dudes, carefully deciding exactly how awful they had to make an immigration bill before it could pass a Congress full of bigots, cynical fake-bigots and wingnuts. Even Ted Cruz was sort of civil as he hectored the committee for not passing his amendments, <a href="http://blog.chron.com/txpotomac/2013/05/cruzs-attempt-to-strip-citizenship-provision-from-immigration-reform-fails-in-a-big-way/?cmpid=hpfsln">most of which</a> were designed to ruin the bill. Everyone who opposes the bill, and those proposed amendments designed to sink it, had to say that they deeply <em>wanted</em> immigration reform to happen, it's just that they defined reform as "no citizenship plus a bigger fence." (Also everyone referred to the bill's authors as the "group of eight" and not a "gang.")</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/why_democrats_abandoned_lgbt_immigrants/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/why_democrats_abandoned_lgbt_immigrants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McConnell: Obamacare will dominate 2014 midterms</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/mcconnell_obamacare_will_dominate_2014_midterms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/mcconnell_obamacare_will_dominate_2014_midterms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13303271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“I think it’s coming back big-time," he said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., predicted that Obamacare would dominate the 2014 midterm elections.</p><p>“I don’t know what the issues will be next year. If I were predicting what’s likely to be the biggest issue in the 2014 election, I think it would be Obamacare,” he said on Meet The Press, the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/05/19/mcconnell-predicts-obamacare-will-be-biggest-issue-of-2014-election/?wprss=rss_election-2012">Washington Post</a> reports. “I think it’s coming back big-time.”</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/mcconnell_obamacare_will_dominate_2014_midterms/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/mcconnell_obamacare_will_dominate_2014_midterms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stevens: Rationale for Bush v. Gore was &#8220;unacceptable&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/stevens_rationale_for_bush_v_gore_was_unacceptable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/stevens_rationale_for_bush_v_gore_was_unacceptable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 02:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Stevens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Roberts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13301081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former Supreme Court justice speaks out on John Roberts and the case that decided the 2000 election]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens said Thursday night that he's come to the realization that the rationale behind the court's Bush v. Gore decision that effectively decided the 2000 presidential election "was really quite unacceptable" because it differentiated between so-called "hanging chads" and "dimpled chads." That distinction, he told a gala event for the liberal watchdog group Public Citizen in Washington, "violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution." All votes should have been considered the same way, he explained.</p><p>Former Justice Sandra Day O'Connor <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/oconnor_maybe_scotus_shouldnt_have_ruled_on_bush_v_gore/">recently expressed regret</a> that the court had taken up the case at all, and Stevens said he was "pleased to hear" about O'Connor's shift. The liberal Stevens wrote the dissent in that case.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/stevens_rationale_for_bush_v_gore_was_unacceptable/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/stevens_rationale_for_bush_v_gore_was_unacceptable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White House trolls Republicans over Obamacare hashtag</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/white_house_trolls_republicans_over_obamacare_hashtag/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/white_house_trolls_republicans_over_obamacare_hashtag/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 20:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13300753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GOP's #ObamaCareinThreeWords campaign takes a turn for the hilarious following ominous @whitehouse response ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>House Republicans are preparing for a full floor vote on a repeal of the Affordable Care Act on Thursday. In the meantime, they have started a Twitter campaign in the form of the hashtag #ObamaCareinThreeWords, to get opponents of the law excited about the vote.</p><p>It began with tweets by Republicans:</p><p>[embedtweet id="335116680499974144"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="335097469962682368"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="335115056721317888"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="335118484482695168"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="335121258423386112"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="335120630779359232"]</p><p>But then the White House started trolling them:</p><p>[embedtweet id="335104215863132160"]</p><p>The hashtag, which began trending, also inspired some political pundits to get in on the joke:</p><p>[embedtweet id="335118202113761280"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="335107475634278401"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="335099983093178368"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="335098244176674816"]</p><p>But even ultra-conservative Republican Rep. Steve Stockman knew where to draw the line:</p><p>[embedtweet id="335120430815932416"]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/white_house_trolls_republicans_over_obamacare_hashtag/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/white_house_trolls_republicans_over_obamacare_hashtag/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>6 reasons Obama is losing the left</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/6_reasons_obamas_popularity_is_likely_to_plummet_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/6_reasons_obamas_popularity_is_likely_to_plummet_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13300703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The politics of hope and the politics of nope]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a>It’s not just the scandal fever that’s invaded Washington, where the Obama White House is dodging accusations that the IRS went after the Tea Party, or it lied in the fog of war in the aftermath of the deadly attack on the embassy in Libya, or the Justice Department went too far in spying on Associated Press to find out who was leaking details about the the CIA’s secret wars.</p><p>Obama’s popularity seems destined to slide downhill as his second term unfolds, even if polls taken just before this latest political moment show that Obama’s core supporters are still with him. Looking beyond this week’s accusatory headlines, there are a handful of single issues that will resonate among key Democratic constituencies and big-picture economic issues that seem destined to push Obama’a ratings down. He may not end his presidency in the low 20s like George W. Bush. But it’s not a stretch to say that Obama’s 51 percent approval ratings last week may be the best that he will see this term.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/6_reasons_obamas_popularity_is_likely_to_plummet_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/6_reasons_obamas_popularity_is_likely_to_plummet_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>64</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House Republicans will again try to repeal Obamacare</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/house_republicans_will_again_try_to_repeal_obamacare_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/house_republicans_will_again_try_to_repeal_obamacare_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 13:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Cantor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13300286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Thursday, Republicans will add to the dozens of times they tried and failed to repeal the Affordable Care Act]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Thursday, House Republicans will try again to repeal the Affordable Care Act, this time after <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/house_republicans_will_again_try_to_repeal_obamacare/">pressure</a> from freshman conservative members of the caucus who are frustrated that they have not yet had the chance to vote for a repeal.</p><p>This time around, House Republicans are fueled by the IRS scandal, because of the agency's role in distributing funds from the law. The <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/05/15/what-the-irs-scandal-means-for-health-care-reform/">Washington Post</a> reports:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/house_republicans_will_again_try_to_repeal_obamacare_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/house_republicans_will_again_try_to_repeal_obamacare_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama reenters health care debate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/obama_reenters_health_care_debate_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/obama_reenters_health_care_debate_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 12:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mother's Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13294697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president is attempting to rally the public around a sweeping federal overhaul of the nation's insurance system]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama is launching a new effort to rally the public around his hotly disputed health care law, a strategy aimed at shoring up key components of the sweeping federal overhaul and staving off yet another challenge from Republicans.</p><p>The president will specifically target women and young people, groups that backed him overwhelmingly during his presidential campaigns. During a Mother's Day-themed event at the White House on Friday, Obama will promote the benefits of the law for women, including free cancer screenings and contraceptives, and ask moms to urge their uninsured adult children to sign up for the health insurance "exchanges" that open this fall.</p><p>The exchanges are the centerpiece of the landmark overhaul of the nation's health insurance system. Three years after it became law, the measure widely known as "Obamacare" remains controversial, with GOP lawmakers resolving anew to overturn it and many Americans unsure how they'll be affected.</p><p>White House advisers acknowledge they struggled in explaining the complex law to the public when it passed in 2010. Now, with the final components being implemented, Obama allies see a fresh opportunity to sell the American people on the merits of measures that will be central to the president's legacy.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/obama_reenters_health_care_debate_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/obama_reenters_health_care_debate_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>