<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Obamacare</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/obamacare/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 23:03:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Michele Bachmann again tries to repeal Obamacare</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/michele_bachmann_again_tries_to_repeal_obamacare/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/michele_bachmann_again_tries_to_repeal_obamacare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 22:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the 34th time, legislation has been introduced into Congress to repeal the Affordable Care Act]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently still unfazed by the Supreme Court's <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/07/03/roberts_wrote_both_obamacare_opinions/">ruling</a>, Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., announced today that she introduced legislation into the new Congress to repeal the Affordable Health Care Act.</p><p>Bachmann tweeted:</p><p>[embedtweet id="286909118814511104"]</p><p>According to a report by <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18563_162-57470643/health-care-repeal-effort-worth-the-time/?tag=stack">CBS News</a> in July, the then-33 unsuccessful attempts by House Republicans to repeal the law had used up around 80 hours of time in Congress, or two full work weeks, at a cost of around $48 million.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/michele_bachmann_again_tries_to_repeal_obamacare/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/michele_bachmann_again_tries_to_repeal_obamacare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court: Emergency contraception stays in Obamacare</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/supreme_court_emergency_contraception_stays_in_obamacare/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/supreme_court_emergency_contraception_stays_in_obamacare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 00:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hobby Lobby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contraception]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13155351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The challenge may continue in the lower courts]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor has denied a request to block part of the federal health care law that requires employee health-care plans to provide insurance coverage for the morning-after pill and similar emergency contraception pills.</p><p>Hobby Lobby Stores and a sister company, Mardel Inc., sued the government, claiming the mandate violates the religious beliefs of its owners.</p><p>In an opinion issued Wednesday, Sotomayor said the stores fail to satisfy the demanding legal standard for blocking the requirement on an emergency basis. She said the companies may continue their challenge to the regulations in the lower courts.</p><p>Company officials say they must decide whether to violate their faith or face a daily $1.3 million fine beginning Jan. 1 if they ignore the law.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/supreme_court_emergency_contraception_stays_in_obamacare/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/supreme_court_emergency_contraception_stays_in_obamacare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How feminism caused Sandy Hook, according to the right</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/how_feminism_caused_sandy_hook_according_to_the_right/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/how_feminism_caused_sandy_hook_according_to_the_right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook Elementary Shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Huckabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13150401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those on the right who would blame the tragedy on anything but guns see women as the problem -- not the heroes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The dogged wish of many on the right to make the tragic Sandy Hook shooting about anything but guns means that it has to be about other things -- ideally, things they already do not like. Things like feminism, abortion or anything else that contributes to the oppression of white men, of which, you’ll note, murderous rampager Adam Lanza was one. And when it came to the last point, solipsism was not limited to the right. Here, a guide to the lowlights.</p><p><strong>Blame Obamacare and abortion. </strong>We heard, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/huckabee_blames_gays_for_the_newtown_massacre/">early out of the gate,</a> from Mike Huckabee, who didn’t wait for the funerals to start blaming the liberal banishment of God from schools and government, including “tax-funded abortion pills,” by which the Personhood proponent meant birth control. “We dismiss the notion of natural law and the notion that there are moral absolutes and seemed amazed when some kids make it their own morality to kill innocent children. We diminish and even hold in contempt <a href="http://mikehuckabee.com/mike-huckabee-news?ID=70415326-e438-41e4-9972-467097d2029f&amp;buffer_share=45810&amp;utm_source=buffer">the natural family of a father and mother </a>creating and then responsibly raising the next generation and then express dismay that kids feel no real connection to their families or even the concept of a family.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/how_feminism_caused_sandy_hook_according_to_the_right/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/how_feminism_caused_sandy_hook_according_to_the_right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>59</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obamacare, brought to you by Johnson &amp; Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/obamacare_brought_to_you_by_johnson_johnson/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/obamacare_brought_to_you_by_johnson_johnson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 22:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BillMoyers.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnson & Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Fowler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liz Fowler]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13124331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When push comes to shove, corporate interests will always have the upper hand in determining public policy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We’ve seen how Washington insiders write the rules of politics and the economy to protect powerful special interests, but now as we enter the holiday season, and a month or so after the election, we’re getting a refresher course in just how that inside game is played, gifts and all. In this round, Santa doesn’t come down the chimney -- he simply squeezes his jolly old self through the revolving door.</p><p>It’s an old story, the latest chapter of which came to light a few days ago with a small item in <em>Politico</em> : “Elizabeth Fowler is leaving the White House for a senior-level position leading ‘global health policy’ at Johnson &amp; Johnson’s government affairs and policy group.”</p><p>A familiar name. We had talked about Liz Fowler on <em>Bill Moyers Journal</em> in 2009, during the early stages of Obama’s health care reform. She was at the center of the action, sitting behind Montana Senator Max Baucus, chairman of the Senate Finance Committee at committee hearings. Bill noted, “She used to work for WellPoint, the largest health insurer in the country. She was Vice President of Public Policy. And now she's working for the very committee with the most power to give her old company and the entire industry exactly what they want: higher profits, and no competition from alternative non-profit coverage that could lower costs and premiums.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/obamacare_brought_to_you_by_johnson_johnson/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/obamacare_brought_to_you_by_johnson_johnson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Companies face Obamacare preexisting condition fee</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/companies_face_obamacare_pre_exisitng_condition_fee/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/companies_face_obamacare_pre_exisitng_condition_fee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 22:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pre-existing conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big story you missed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13120860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Workers will likely end up covering the $63-per-head fee ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) -- Your medical plan is facing an unexpected expense, so you probably are, too. It's a new, $63-per-head fee to cushion the cost of covering people with pre-existing conditions under President Barack Obama's health care overhaul.</p><p>The charge, buried in a recent regulation, works out to tens of millions of dollars for the largest companies, employers say. Most of that is likely to be passed on to workers.</p><p>Employee benefits lawyer Chantel Sheaks calls it a "sleeper issue" with significant financial consequences, particularly for large employers.</p><p>"Especially at a time when we are facing economic uncertainty, (companies will) be hit with a multi-million dollar assessment without getting anything back for it," said Sheaks, a principal at Buck Consultants, a Xerox subsidiary.</p><p>Based on figures provided in the regulation, employer and individual health plans covering an estimated 190 million Americans could owe the per-person fee.</p><p>The Obama administration says it is a temporary assessment levied for three years starting in 2014, designed to raise $25 billion. It starts at $63 and then declines.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/companies_face_obamacare_pre_exisitng_condition_fee/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/companies_face_obamacare_pre_exisitng_condition_fee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obamacare architect heads to Big Pharma</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/obamacare_architect_heads_to_big_pharma/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/obamacare_architect_heads_to_big_pharma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 20:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liz Fowler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnson & Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Option]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Pharma]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13116112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Liz Fowler again exemplifies the blurred lines between the healthcare industry and Washington]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liz Fowler, well known as the architect of President Obama's Affordable Care Act, never really left the healthcare industry. Before and after working as chief health policy counsel for Sen. Max Baucus (the position from which she drafted Obamacare), Fowler worked for the nation's largest health insurance provider Well Point. She was then appointed by Obama to oversee the implementation of her Obamacare legislation and now, as Glenn Greenwald <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/dec/05/obamacare-fowler-lobbyist-industry1">flagged</a> Wednesday, will be taking up a senior position with Johnson &amp; Johnson.</p><p>As Greenwald noted:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/obamacare_architect_heads_to_big_pharma/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/obamacare_architect_heads_to_big_pharma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Could public health care have saved Hostess?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/23/could_public_health_care_have_saved_hostess/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/23/could_public_health_care_have_saved_hostess/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vulture Capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hostess]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacobin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13105626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vulture capitalism played its part in the company's demise, but rising coverage costs may have sealed its fate]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jacobinmag.com"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/Jacobin.jpg" alt="Jacobin" align="left" /></a> Hostess Brands, maker of the Twinkie, <a href="http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/11/16/hostess-brands-says-it-will-liquidate/">announced its liquidation</a> last week. This provoked a wave of <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/the-recoverydeficit-reduction-deal-the-two-parties-should-but-wont-strike/2011/05/19/AGxljgOH_blog.html">now-more-than-everism</a>, as both liberals and conservatives rushed to use the company’s failure as a testament to their longstanding hobbyhorses.</p><p>To the Right, of course, the end of Hostess is just another great opportunity to bash unions. Although perhaps it’s a sign of progress that even Fox News decided to soft-pedal this line, talking up the conciliatory position of the Teamsters while <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/11/16/hostess-brands-to-liquidate-lay-off-18500-after-crippling-union-fight/">blaming</a> the recalcitrance of the Bakery, Confectionary, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers union for the closure. The idea that this is all about greedy unions is idiotic beyond belief, but sadly something we apparently still have to talk about. So if you don’t believe me you can go read <a href="http://adifferentclass.com/post/35839856607/we-deeply-regret-the-necessity-of-todays">Sarah Jaffe</a> or <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/she-the-people/wp/2012/11/16/unions-did-not-kill-twinkies-but-theyll-take-the-fall/">Diana Reese</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/23/could_public_health_care_have_saved_hostess/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/23/could_public_health_care_have_saved_hostess/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dumb tweet of the day: Obamacare will hurt Papa John&#8217;s</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/dumb_tweet_of_the_day_obamacare_will_hurt_papa_johns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/dumb_tweet_of_the_day_obamacare_will_hurt_papa_johns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 22:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pizza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Papa John's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aca]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13101253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Experts say that Obamacare will not cost Papa John's much, but the company's CEO threatens a price increase anyway]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[embed_tweet id="269548579515924480"]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/dumb_tweet_of_the_day_obamacare_will_hurt_papa_johns/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/dumb_tweet_of_the_day_obamacare_will_hurt_papa_johns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Papa John&#8217;s Obamacare idiocy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/papa_johns_bad_obamacare_math/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/papa_johns_bad_obamacare_math/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 20:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Papa John's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aca]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13100796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CEO John Schnatter insists that the Affordable Care Act necessitates price increases. Experts disagree]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Papa John's Pizza seems to be gunning for Chick-fil-A's "most heartless fast-food chain" title after CEO John Schnatter <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/08/papa_john_if_you_force_me_to_provide_employees_with_affordable_healthcare_i_will_raise_the_price_of_my_gross_pizza/">threatened to increase pizza prices</a> by 11 to 14 cents per pie and cut back employee hours if the Affordable Care Act isn't repealed. Schnatter has found support from more than <a href="https://www.facebook.com/events/166991153444752/">20,000 Facebook users (and counting)</a>, who have staged an "eat-in" to protest Obamacare and its effects on the food chain:</p><blockquote><p>Papa Johns has been targeted by the left for a boycott, for simply articulating that ObamaCare would hurt profits and force cutbacks in employee hours. Stand up to this nonsensical and illogical action and support Papa Johns this Friday!</p></blockquote><p>Forbes' Caleb Melby <a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/calebmelby/2012/11/12/breaking-down-centi-millionaire-papa-john-schnatters-obamacare-math/">points out</a>, however, that Schnatter's underlying logic doesn't make sense when you look at the numbers:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/papa_johns_bad_obamacare_math/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/papa_johns_bad_obamacare_math/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>250</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Denny&#8217;s to offset Obamacare costs by cutting worker hours</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/dennys_to_offset_obamacare_costs_by_cutting_worker_hours/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/dennys_to_offset_obamacare_costs_by_cutting_worker_hours/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 21:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fast food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denny's]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13100040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Florida franchise of the restaurant is among a number of chains cutting labor costs]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In order to offset the costs of the Affordable Care Act, a chain of Denny's restaurants plans<span> reduce employees' hours. The Mail Online<a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2233221/Dennys-charge-5-Obamacare-surcharge-cut-employee-hours-deal-cost-legislation.html?fb_action_ids=855459056233&amp;fb_action_types=og.likes&amp;fb_source=other_multiline&amp;action_object_map={%22855459056233%22:266583473464386}&amp;action_type_map={%22855459056233%22:%22og.likes%22}&amp;action_ref_map=[]"> reported </a>Thursday <span>that Florida-based restaurant owner John Metz, who runs approximately 40 Denny's and owns the Hurricane Grill &amp; Wings franchise, will cut workers' hours in advance of Obamacare's full implementation in January 2014.<br /> </span></span></p><p><span>"It's going to force my employees to go out and get a second job," Metz admitted to the Mail, saying he felt he had no choice.</span></p><p>Metz has also considered adding a 5 percent surcharge to customer bills, but has no plans to implement this idea.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/dennys_to_offset_obamacare_costs_by_cutting_worker_hours/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/dennys_to_offset_obamacare_costs_by_cutting_worker_hours/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mitt: Obama bribed voters</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/romney_obama_bribed_his_voters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/romney_obama_bribed_his_voters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 22:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[student loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13073390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The failed candidate says the president's base was motivated by "gifts" from the government]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a call with his disappointed donors Mitt Romney attributed his election loss to "gifts" President Barack Obama gave to important constituencies like young and African American voters. The Los Angeles Times <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-romney-election-campaign-donors-20121114,0,5622330.story">reported</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Obama, Romney argued, had been “very generous” to blacks, Hispanics and young voters. He cited as motivating factors to young voters the administration’s plan for partial forgiveness of college loan interest and the extension of health coverage for students on their parents’ insurance plans well into their 20s. Free contraception coverage under Obama’s healthcare plan, he added, gave an extra incentive to college-aged women to back the president.</p> <p>Romney argued that the Obama’s health care plan’s promise of coverage “in perpetuity” was “highly motivational” to those voters making $25,000 to $35,000 who might not have been covered, as well as to African American and Hispanic voters. Pivoting to immigration, Romney said the Obama campaign’s efforts to paint him as “anti-immigrant” had been effective and that the administration’s promise to offer what he called “amnesty” to the children of illegal immigrants had helped turn out Hispanic voters in record numbers.</p> <p>“The President’s campaign,” he said, “focused on giving targeted groups a big gift—so he made a big effort on small things. Those small things, by the way, add up to trillions of dollars.”</p></blockquote><p>"They cannot stop being disrespectful and dismissive," Cynthia Tucker, a professor at the University of Georgia, slammed Romney's call on MSNBC. "They cannot speak of us as Americans, as voters."</p><p>Romney added that the donor group could be the basis of a future network that could wield some influence in the Republican Party. He said there was potential to hold annual meetings over the future direction of the GOP including the next presidential candidate, “Which, by the way...will not be me.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/romney_obama_bribed_his_voters/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/romney_obama_bribed_his_voters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>79</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wisconsin GOPers back bill to arrest officials who implement Obamacare</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/wisconsin_gopers_back_bill_to_arrest_officials_who_implement_obamacare/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/wisconsin_gopers_back_bill_to_arrest_officials_who_implement_obamacare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 21:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13072723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republican lawmakers say they still don't buy that the law is Constitutional]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A group of Republican lawmakers in Wisconsin say that they would back a bill that would declare the Affordable Care Act illegal, and allow law enforcement to arrest any federal officials who try to implement it.</p><p>The nine lawmakers were <a href="http://www.campaignforliberty.org/surveys/wisconsin-state-legislative-candidates-2/">responding to a survey</a> from the conservative advocacy group the Campaign For Liberty, and responded "yes" to the question: "Will you support legislation to nullify ObamaCare and authorize state and local law enforcement to arrest federal officials attempting to implement the unconstitutional health care scheme known as ObamaCare?"</p><p>Gov. Scott Walker has until Friday to decide whether he'll create a health care exchange in the state as mandated by the law, or let the administration handle it.</p><p>Rep. Chris Kapenga (R-Delafield) told the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel that he still believes the law is not constitutional, despite a Supreme Court ruling to the contrary. "Just because Obama was re-elected does not mean he's above the constitution," Kapenga said.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/wisconsin_gopers_back_bill_to_arrest_officials_who_implement_obamacare/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/wisconsin_gopers_back_bill_to_arrest_officials_who_implement_obamacare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ballot measures: A rundown of results</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/ballot_measures_a_rundown_of_results/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/ballot_measures_a_rundown_of_results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 20:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Trafficking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alabama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ballot measures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Death Penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13065410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[States weighed in on issues including the death penalty, GMO labeling, human trafficking and racist language ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Voters around the country weighed in Tuesday on a cornucopia of ballot measures, offering a partial insight into the state of opinion around the nation on issues ranging from genetically modified foods to the death penalty.</p><p><strong>Racist language to remain in Alabama Constitution -- but perhaps with good reason:</strong></p><p>Alabama voted against a measure to remove references to segregation in its state Constitution, which includes the line, “separate schools shall be provided for white and colored children.” Amendment 4 would have removed the racist language, but, its opponents argued, it carried with it a series of other, largely tax-based contentions. As the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/31/us/alabama-simmers-before-vote-on-its-constitutions-racist-language.html?pagewanted=all">New York Times reported </a>in advance of the vote:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/ballot_measures_a_rundown_of_results/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/ballot_measures_a_rundown_of_results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will the hot-button ballot measures pass?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/05/will_the_hot_button_ballot_measures_pass/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/05/will_the_hot_button_ballot_measures_pass/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 21:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marijuana Legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GMO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genetically modified food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monsanto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Trafficking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13062935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some voters will decide on GM food, human trafficking, marijuana legalization and symbolic opposition to Obamacare]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Labeling GM food; fighting Monsanto:</strong></p><p>On Tuesday Californians will vote on whether genetically modified food sold in supermarkets will have to be labeled. In an effort to defeat the ballot measure, food and agribusiness giants including Monsanto, Nestle, Dupont and Pepsico have together spent over  $45 million, the <a href="http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/11/05/food-companies-monsanto-dupont-pepsico-and-nestle-spend-45m-to-defeat-california-gm-label-bill-prop-37/">Guardian reported</a> Monday.</p><p>Although supported by anti-GM and anti-Monsanto activists, Proposition 37 only goes some way to inform Californians about the genetically modified foods on the market. The measure does not cover restaurants and does not require GM labels on meat from animals fed GM corn. However, many pundits believe that if Proposition 37 passes in California, it will lead to national mandatory GM label requirements.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/05/will_the_hot_button_ballot_measures_pass/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/05/will_the_hot_button_ballot_measures_pass/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How bad would Mitt be?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/26/ten_horrible_things_mitt_would_do_if_elected/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/26/ten_horrible_things_mitt_would_do_if_elected/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 20:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nate Silver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13053846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's hard to predict with Romney's record of flip-flopping, but if elected, these policies are a safe bet]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> With the polls showing a tightening race, a Mitt Romney presidency is becoming a real possibility. As I write, New York Times polling guru Nate Silver gives the Republican a 29-percent chance of emerging victorious when the votes are cast in just under two weeks.</p><p align="LEFT">The Romney-Ryan campaign has offered a bewildering and often contradictory array of positions on the issues, which makes predicting what a Romney agenda might look like exceptionally difficult. What's more, we'd see a very different Romney administration if Democrats retain control of the Senate. Silver gives them an 88 percent chance of doing so, projecting Dems to hold 52.4 seats in the next Congress (it's highly unlikely they'll win the House).</p><p align="LEFT">But if Romney were to sweep the toss-up swing states — which he has to do in order to win the White House — that would require a strong GOP turnout and a stronger showing in those Senate races.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/26/ten_horrible_things_mitt_would_do_if_elected/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/26/ten_horrible_things_mitt_would_do_if_elected/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>58</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mitt&#8217;s Romneycare schizophrenia</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/17/mitts_romneycare_schizophrenia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/17/mitts_romneycare_schizophrenia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Next New Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Columbus Dispatch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13043548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's a huge achievement for Massachusetts. It's dangerous for America. Which one is it, Romney?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nextnewdeal.net/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/05/next-new-deal-logo.png" alt="Next New Deal" align="left" /></a> As Romney aimed to prove that he cared about the 100 percent in last night's debate, part of the stream of accomplishments he listed in his final answer was his audacious claim that “as governor of my state, I was able to get a hundred percent of my people insured -- all my kids; about 98 percent of the adults.” What’s audacious is not that’s its untrue – it is true. But it takes a lot of brass to trumpet as evidence of your compassion something that you are planning to deny to the 98 percent of Americans who don’t live in Massachusetts. That is of course what Romney plans to do with his pledge to repeal Obamacare.</p><p>Last week, Romney <a href="http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2012/10/11/health-care-called-choice.html" target="_blank">told</a> the editors of the <em>Columbus Dispatch</em> that “We don't have people that become ill, who die in their apartment because they don't have insurance.” Romney is right again, but in a very perverted way. Most of the time people who die because they are denied health insurance spend their last days in the hospital after getting very sick in their houses or apartments.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/17/mitts_romneycare_schizophrenia/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/17/mitts_romneycare_schizophrenia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mitt: People don&#8217;t die because they lack insurance</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/romney_people_dont_die_because_they_lack_insurance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/romney_people_dont_die_because_they_lack_insurance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 18:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13037202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Romney doubles down on his claim that people without insurance don't "die in their apartment"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an interview with <a href="http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2012/10/11/health-care-called-choice.html">the Columbus Dispatch</a>, Mitt Romney reiterated his claim that people don't die from a lack of insurance.</p><p>“We don’t have a setting across this country where if you don’t have insurance, we just say to you, ‘Tough luck, you’re going to die when you have your heart attack,’ ” he said.</p><p>“No, you go to the hospital, you get treated, you get care, and it’s paid for, either by charity, the government or by the hospital. We don’t have people that become ill, who die in their apartment because they don’t have insurance," Romney continued.</p><p>According to a 2009 study by <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2009/09/17/us-usa-healthcare-deaths-idUSTRE58G6W520090917">Harvard Medical School,</a> 45,000 people die each year, mainly because they lack health insurance. People aged 64 and under who don't have health care insurance have a 40 percent higher risk of death than those who do have insurance, the study found.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/romney_people_dont_die_because_they_lack_insurance/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/romney_people_dont_die_because_they_lack_insurance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Red Lobster, Olive Garden hire part-timers to avoid Obamacare</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/red_lobster_olive_garden_hire_part_timers_to_avoid_obamacare/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/red_lobster_olive_garden_hire_part_timers_to_avoid_obamacare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 15:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Lobster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Restaurants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olive Garden]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13037040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chain restaurant corporation experimenting with ways to offset Affordable Care Act costs]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darden Concepts, the corporation that owns restaurant chains Red Lobster and Olive Garden to offset the costs of Obamacare. According to<a href="http://leanforward.msnbc.com/_news/2012/10/10/14342234-restaurant-chain-experiments-with-more-part-time-work-to-avoid-obamacare-costs?lite"> a report from Ned Resnikoff</a> at MSNBC, the company is experimenting with an increased reliance on part-time workers:</p><blockquote><p>If the experiment is a success, the company overall could come to rely more on part-time workers. Those new employees would likely not enjoy the same health benefits that all employees currently do. "Today we offer health care to all of our employees," said Rich Jeffers, [a spokesperson for Darden]. But under the Affordable Care Act, which sets minimum standards for the health care being provided, "we can't offer that."</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/red_lobster_olive_garden_hire_part_timers_to_avoid_obamacare/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/red_lobster_olive_garden_hire_part_timers_to_avoid_obamacare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mitt&#8217;s accidental plan to boost abortion rates</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/05/mitts_accidental_plan_to_boost_abortion_rates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/05/mitts_accidental_plan_to_boost_abortion_rates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 21:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Affordable Care Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13031907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new study reveals that repealing the Affordable Care Act could produce an increase in unwanted pregnancies]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Shortly after the first presidential debate, a new study was published that revealed Romney’s plan to repeal Obamacare would ultimately result in many more unwanted pregnancies. The new data, <a href="http://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/Abstract/publishahead/Preventing_Unintended_Pregnancies_by_Providing.99945.aspx">published</a> by the Contraceptive CHOICE Project in <em>Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, </em>found that providing women with no-cost birth control, as does Obama’s Affordable Care Act, and educating them on effective protective measures dramatically reduced unwanted pregnancies.</p><p>Researchers enrolled 9,256 adolescents and women from the St. Louis region who were at risk of unintended pregnancy, such as those who had used abortion services in the past. For three years, the women were counseled on effective birth control methods. While IUDs and implants were emphasized (as pills require strict adherence), they were also provided with this birth control at no cost.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/05/mitts_accidental_plan_to_boost_abortion_rates/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/05/mitts_accidental_plan_to_boost_abortion_rates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>States cut dental care for the poor</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/03/states_cut_dental_care_for_the_poor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/03/states_cut_dental_care_for_the_poor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 18:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dental Care]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13029288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Medicaid recipients around the country are now unable to afford basic dental health]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dental care has been stripped from Medicaid programs in cash-strapped states including Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, Illinois, California and Washington, the Huffington Post reported Wednesday.</p><p>Daniel Lippman<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/02/medicaid-dental-cuts_n_1930650.html"> reports:</a></p><blockquote><p>Under Medicaid -- which has about 60 million recipients -- states are not allowed to cut dental care for children. But for adults, dental care is an "optional service," according to federal reimbursement guidelines. But medical experts say proper dental care is a core part of overall good health and warn that it will cost more to treat these people in the long run.</p> <p>... In 2007, Washington state was spending more than $30 million annually on its adult dental Medicaid program. In recent years, however, the state has cut those benefits, and in 2011 it axed non-emergency dental care for all Medicaid-eligible adults except those with developmental disabilities, long-term care patients, and pregnant women. Of the 488,000 Medicaid-eligible adults in the state, only 38,000 are still eligible for non-emergency care, according to data compiled by the <a href="http://www.wsda.org/" target="_hplink">Washington State Dental Association</a>.</p></blockquote><p>Obamacare will aim to ensure that all children and young adults under 21 have dental coverage, but the plan's requirement to obtain healthcare does not apply to dental and vision coverage for adults.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/03/states_cut_dental_care_for_the_poor/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/03/states_cut_dental_care_for_the_poor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>