With 100% of precincts partially or fully reporting, War Room can officially declare Orly Taitz more popular and credible than Mickey Kaus. By a lot.
In her race for the GOP nomination for California secretary of state, Birther Queen Taitz, a dentist/attorney whose pet cause is filing frivolous lawsuits challenging the president’s natural-born status, received 372,490 votes.
In his race to unseat Democratic US Senator Barbara Boxer, Kaus, a longtime blogger whose pet cause is hating unions and immigrants, received 94,298 votes.
Both, sadly, lost by wide margins. (Though Taitz received more votes than Republican Senate candidates Tom Campbell and Chuck DeVore.)
(Credit Dave Weigel for first deciding to compare the vote totals of our favorite insurgent politicians.)
Alex Pareene writes about politics for Salon. Email him at apareene@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @pareene More Alex Pareene
I just exercised my franchise as a California voter, and hoo boy, the pickings were slim. On the Democratic side, most of the primary races were uncontested. I dutifully voted for a bond measure supporting public pools in Berkeley and rejected nearly all of the propositions on the ballot, including one that would have created an open primary in California in which the top two vote-getters, irrespective of party affiliation, would advance to the general election.
I did think twice about that one, however, because if California currently operated under such rules, I would have had the pleasure of seeing the name of Orly Taitz on my ballot. The Queen Bee of the Birthers is running for secretary of state on the Republican side, but only Republicans get to to vote in the Republican primary.
My state is so awesome. Orly Taitz, who does a better imitation of a legitimately crazy person that most raving psychopaths, is running for office and may even win a primary. I can’t say I’m too shocked: After all, I live in a state currently governed by a man most famous for playing a killer robot from the future.
But it’s still crazy. Crazy! Crazy, crazy, crazy. I have read legal filings submitted by Orly Taitz and I have watched her doomed attempts to form coherent sentences on television news shows and I have read her blog, and the thought that she might actually one day be elected to an office of governmental responsibility fills me with deeper terror than even the prospect of mass-murdering machines from the future laying waste to all I hold dear.
I’m thinking that maybe I should have switched my party registration just to vote no. Because today could be the beginning of the great Orly Taitz climb to power, and in the years to come, those of us who could have stopped her might rue the day. First a primary win in a light-turnout off-year election, then a general election victory fueled by California Tea Party rage … four years from now, she’d be a shoo-in for governor of California. And then … a couple of years after that …?
Oh wait — Orly Taitz was born in 1960 in Moldova, formerly part of the Soviet Union. So she is not a natural-born American citizen, and thus she, like your average time-traveling Austrian-accented death-dealing automaton, isn’t eligible to be president of the United States.
A grateful nation wipes its brow. Disaster averted! There will be no President Taitz.
Unless … Who alive today knows more about how to forge a birth certificate than Orly, scourge of the Manchurian Obama candidate? How long before we suddenly find out that Taitz was actually born in Texas (or Hawaii, a state notorious for bad birth certificate record keeping) and spirited away to the USSR by parents who were mortally distraught at Jack Kennedy’s (stolen) victory over Richard Nixon?
I swear to you now, dear readers, that having failed you once by not finding a way to vote against Orly Taitz in her first run for office, I will not fail you again, should she emerge victorious, and set off on her path to the White House. I will become Orly’s Orly, scourge of the Birther scourge, relentlessly exposing her trail of identity fraud terror. It’s the least I can do.
I’m starting now. I demand to see Orly Taitz’s Moldovan birth certificate, to prove that is real. Why hasn’t she shown it to us already? What’s she trying to hide?
California attorney Orly Taitz, the president of the Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, stands on the steps of the Federal Courthouse in Columbus, Ga., Friday, Sept. 11, 2009, with what she claims is a copy of a birth certificate for President Barak Obama from Mombass, British Protectorate of Kenya. Taitz represents U.S. Army Capt. Connie Rhodes in a civil complaint filed Friday questioning the country of Obama's birth and his eligibility to be president. PHOTO BY: Robin Trimarchi/Columbus (Ga) Ledger-Enquirer (Credit: Robin Trimarchi)
Orly Taitz, who is a legitimately crazy person, is running for California secretary of state. Taitz, a dentist and attorney, has dedicated her life to suing Barack Obama over and over again until he finally admits that he was secretly born in Kenya. And she just might win the GOP nomination today.
Taitz’ opponent has apparently barely even campaigned, just relying on the fact that he’s running against a crazy person to win the nomination. (Taitz, meanwhile, has filed a number of suits against him, attempting to get him off the ballot because he was once a registered Democrat.) But that might not be enough.
Politico, god bless them, found a professional “strategist” to get our hopes up about a Taitz victory:
But longtime California GOP strategist Allan Hoffenblum, who publishes the California Target Book, says a Taitz victory is entirely possible. “It will be a complete embarrassment if she wins, but these things can happen,” he said.
It is a down-ballot race in a midterm primary election, so, really, anything can happen.
Alex Pareene writes about politics for Salon. Email him at apareene@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @pareene More Alex Pareene
Wonderful news! Big-haired Minnesota Congressloon Michele Bachmann was finally photographed with crazy attorney/dentist and insatiable lover Orly Taitz, the Queen of the Birthers.
The Tea Party Patriots invited both of them to speak at a lunch in California on Friday. Taitz claims Birtherism didn’t come up, but that’s literally the only thing she talks about, so I’m not sure if I believe her. Like, this is how she claimed that she didn’t talk about Birtherism:
“I spoke at the lunch, however I did not speak about ongoing legal actions involving Obama’s use of ss number 042-68-4425, which was assigned to another individual, I also did not talk about Obama’s refusal to unseal his original birth certificate, currently sealed in HI or any other issues of Obama’ illegitimacy to presidency which are raised in the pleadings. I talked only about my candidacy for the position of the Secretary of State of CA.”
Bachmann — an elected official whose willingness to repeat any anti-Obama email forward she reads makes her a regular cable news guest — hanging out with Taitz, a legitimately crazy person whose crusade against Obama is even beginning to embarrass other birthers, is just another example of the Republican Party’s tacit endorsement of the fringe conspiracy nuts.
Coincidentally, professional word-typer and second-dumbest-person-at-The Corner Jonah Goldberg wrote about the Birthers today! He thinks the 9/11 Truthers are worse, and they are liberal Democrats, so they get a “pass” from the MSM.
I’ve written on the essential differences between Birthers and Truthers before. But to sum up: there are far more Republican Birthers than there are Democratic Truthers. The Birther movement is tacitly (and occasionally openly) supported and encouraged by members of the Republican leadership ranging from elected officials to major media figures, while no respectable Democrats endorse Truther claims. The MSM treats both of them as ridiculous, and has worked equally hard to debunk the claims of both groups. Meanwhile, the conservative alternative media generally tolerates Birtherism, while I can’t think of a major liberal site that allows even a hint of Trutherism. And, personally, I find the Birther conspiracy slightly more ridiculous.
This, obviously, is where Jonah and I disagree. He finds it “not that crazy” (“in the abstract,” whatever the fuck he thinks that phrase means) (I think he thinks it is just a handy way to not take full responsibility for your words when you’re in the middle of writing an incredibly stupid sentence) to believe that the president of the United States is ineligible for office because he was secretly born in another country.
Here’s my position: It’s completely preposterous to argue that the government murdered thousands of people in cold blood (and then successfully covered up those murders) in order to launch a war. But the US government has lied to get us into a war before. I think a lot of sympathy for Truthers on the left is simply a misguided extension of the suspicion, based in part on actions like stonewalling the 9/11 commission, that the Bush administration covered up information about pre-attack intelligence and its actions and response that day.
But there’s no historical precedent for a Kenyan pretending to be a natural-born citizen in order to one day assume the presidency under false pretenses. There’s no reason to believe his birth certificate is fake or void or that false birth announcements were “planted” in two separate newspapers for reasons unknown.
In other words, one is a ridiculous expression of oft-justifiable suspicion of the government. The other is just just a bunch of loons looking for some sort of fact-based hook for their unease with a black president.
But the “your crazies are less crazy than our crazies” argument is beside the point. Whichever group is crazier (and plenty of people, like Alex Jones, are both!), the fact remains that here we have an elected Republican almost literally embracing a Birther. Call me, Jonah, when Barney Frank cozies up to Dylan Avery.
They never really went away, actually — in all likelihood, unfortunately, they never will — but the people who believe President Obama doesn’t meet the Constitution’s eligibility requirements for his office have at least faded from the news lately. Now, some are working to change that, and they have a new figurehead to rally behind.
Last week, the American Patriot Foundation announced that Army Lt. Col Terrence Lakin, a flight surgeon, has decided that he’ll refuse to obey any and all orders because of his concerns over the circumstances of Obama’s birth and birth certificate.
“I am today compelled to make the distasteful choice to invite my own court martial, in pursuit of the truth about the president’s eligibility under the constitution to hold office,” Lakin said in a release. (He’s also spoken in a YouTube video about his decision; it can be viewed at the bottom of this post.)
Lakin isn’t the first member of the military to become a Birther cause celebre. The case that brought the now-infamous Orly Taitz her first real mainstream media attention involved another one.
In the past, the impetus for including military men and women in lawsuits had to do with the fact that to bring suit successfully a plaintiff must have what’s known as standing; at minimum, they have to show some sort of particularized injury. In other words, the average person can’t get much past the courtroom door if they sue Obama for his records, saying they’re entitled to them as a voter — there has to be some way in which they’d be more directly affected if he were in fact ineligible. So the various Birther attorneys came up with a plan: Members of the military have to take orders from the president in his capacity as commander-in-chief, so, the theory went, they should have standing. It was at least creative, but it’s also proven unsuccessful for reasons including and beyond the standing issue. Taitz’s behavior in one of the cases even brought her a $20,000 sanction from one federal judge fed up with her antics.
This time, though, there’s no lawsuit on the horizon, Margaret Hemenway, a spokeswoman for the American Patriot Foundation, told Salon. Instead, Lakin appears content to wait for a court-martial, possibly with the hope that if the Army did try him, he could seek Obama’s birth certificate as part of the case. The foundation is working to raise money for Lakin’s defense in the event he is brought up on charges, and Hemenway says he has a legal advisor, though she declined to name him. (Hemenway did say she’d pass on a message to the advisor in case he wanted to talk to Salon, but as of this post, there’s been no word back.)
The Army is aware of Lakin’s pledge, spokesman George Wright said Thursday. But so far, there’s no word on whether the lieutenant colonel will get the disciplinary action he seems to welcome.
“I can say that Lt. Col. Lakin has stated his intent to violate articles 87 and 92 of Uniform Code of Military Justice, but he has not done so,” Wright said, adding that it will be up to Lakin’s chain of command to decide whether his actions thus far violate any regulations. Asked whether, if Lakin follows through on his vow, he’d be likely to face court-martial, Wright would say only, “I can’t speak to that case, but I can say that for soldiers who refuse to follow orders, in particular soldiers who refuse to deploy under combat, there are possible consequences for those actions.”
Hemenway herself has something of a pedigree in the Birther movement. Her father-in-law, John D. Hemenway, faced sanctions for his role as local counsel in a suit brought by the original Birther lawyer, Philip Berg, on behalf of a retired Air Force colonel. The judge ended up opting not to fine her father-in-law, butt that experience is part of what prompted Margaret Hemenway to get involved with the cause generally and this case specifically.
A former Congressional and Pentagon staffer, Hemenway currently writes for outlets such as Family Security Matters, a Web site affiliated with the Center for Security Policy, run by influential neo-conservative Frank Gaffney. (Gaffney himself has expressed some solidarity with the Birthers, and wrote an op-ed for the Washington Times in which he pronounced Obama our first Muslim president.)
One of the members of Congress Hemenway worked for is former Sen. Bob Smith, R-N.H., who served two terms before losing a reelection bid in 2002. Smith, who’d flirted with a run for Senate in his new Florida home recently but dropped out of the race, also happens to be the founder of the American Patriot Foundation. As a result, at least one blogger had suggested the former senator might somehow be involved in the foundation’s efforts on Lakin’s behalf. Reached at home last week, however, Smith told Salon he no longer controls the group, which had essentially been dormant since its founding in 2003 — he handed it over to a friend. (Hemenway confirmed this.)
Asked whether he supported his former foundation’s work for Lakin, Smith said, “I’m just gonna stay out of that right now, I think that my personal belief is that when an officer has a constitutional question I don’t have a problem with that being answered, that’s his legal right to have that answered, but I’m not involved in it.”
This whole thing can ultimately be traced back to the same misinformation that has animated other elements of the Birther movement from the very beginning. In speaking with Salon, for instance, Hemenway repeatedly said Obama hadn’t released the same birth certificate Lakin would have to show the military — but the certification of live birth the president made public during his campaign is the official copy that Hawaii now provides everyone who requests their own records. The foundation’s Web site also cites myths like one about Obama’s step-grandmother confirming that he was born in Kenya; in fact, after an initial miscommunication — or mistranslation — during the conversation in question, she and Obama’s other Kenyan family members all repeatedly emphasized that he was born in Hawaii.