<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Orrin Hatch, R-Utah</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/orrin_hatch_r_utah/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 06:12:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Orrin Hatch&#8217;s guide to avoiding a Tea Party primary challenge</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/23/orrin_guide_senators/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/23/orrin_guide_senators/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orrin Hatch, R-Utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/23/orrin_guide_senators</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The senior senator from Utah didn't have room to move right, so he went mean]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Orrin hatch used to be the symbol of how our American political system could, against the odds, still work for Americans. The rabidly conservative senator was proud to call the steadfastly liberal Sen. Ted Kennedy his personal friend. He is a symbol of how the Senate used to pride itself on civility trumping partisanship. No moderate he, Hatch was still able to see his political opponents as humans, and he could recognize where there was common ground to be sought. And that is why the Tea Parties hated him and wanted to primary him.</p><p>But Hatch got out of it! Somehow, against all odds, Rep. Jason Chaffetz <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2011/08/22/ap_sources_chaffetz_wont_take_on_orrin_hatch/">decided not to run against Hatch</a> in 2012, after going so far as to hold town halls outside his district to gauge support for a run.</p><p>Hatch's poll numbers had <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111903596904576519021824003198.html">begun to crawl up</a>, though, and Chaffetz decided his sure-thing reelection was safer than battling an entrenched million-term senator.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/23/orrin_guide_senators/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/23/orrin_guide_senators/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Orrin Hatch&#8217;s tough love for losers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/26/orrin_hatch_trade_assistance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/26/orrin_hatch_trade_assistance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 20:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orrin Hatch, R-Utah]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/05/26/orrin_hatch_trade_assistance</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is the rust belt listening? Utah's senior senator says "it doesn't make sense" to help workers displaced by trade]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senator Orrin Hatch, frantically trying to position himself ever further to the right as he desperately attempts to ward off a Tea Party primary challenge in his home state of Utah, says Congress should just go ahead and approve three free trade agreements, <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/on-the-money/1005-trade/163521-hatch-says-taa-doesnt-have-votes-to-pass-">without offering aid to American workers</a> who might lose their jobs as a result of the new pacts.</p><blockquote>
<p>Hatch, who has questioned the Obama administration's requirement for passage of Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) in tandem with trade deals with Panama, Colombia and South Korea, said there's no appetite on Capitol Hill for more spending, even for a program that re-trains workers.</p>
<p>"We don't have the votes to pass TAA through this Congress, so why hold up three trade agreements to do this," Hatch said during a Thursday hearing on the U.S-Korea agreement.</p>
<p>"It doesn't make sense to me."</p>
</blockquote><p>I don't care what your position on "free trade" is -- the vast majority of ecoomists, left, right and middle, agree that trade produces <em>both</em> winners and losers. Ask almost any blue collar worker in the Midwest: even if it possible to show that the United States gains a net benefit from trade overall, that's hardly comforting to a middle-aged man or woman who has just lost their job due to competition with China or Mexico.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/26/orrin_hatch_trade_assistance/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/26/orrin_hatch_trade_assistance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This is just a preview of the GOP&#8217;s Tea Party hell</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/20/tea_party_2012_next_wave/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/20/tea_party_2012_next_wave/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympia J. Snowe, R-Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orrin Hatch, R-Utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard G. Lugar, R-Ind.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/09/20/tea_party_2012_next_wave</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There's no reason to think the restive party base will be any less angry two years from now]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What's most striking about the trauma the Tea Party inflicted on the Republican establishment in the Senate primary season that ended last week is how much worse it could have been.</p><p>Sure, the Tea Party base managed to dethrone two sitting senators, Utah's Robert Bennett and Alaska's Lisa Murkowski, and to scare another senator, Arlen Specter, and a governor, Charlie Crist, out of the party. And it knocked off establishment favorites in a handful of key states, like Delaware and Colorado, while scaring the bejesus out of others, like New Hampshire's Kelly Ayotte (who survived her primary by 1,600 votes).</p><p>But when it came to this year's primaries, the Tea Party's momentum was late-starting. It wasn't until Aug. 24, when Joe Miller stunned Lisa Murkowski in an upset absolutely no one saw coming, that its potential became clear. As soon as the result came in, the Tea Party Express, which had quietly dumped $600,000 into Miller's effort, turned its focus to Delaware, another state that was on no one's radar. That support, along with the media's sudden interest, transformed right-wing gadfly Christine O'Donnell into a player, and three weeks later she was declaring victory over Mike Castle, a nine-term congressman and fixture in Delaware politics.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/09/20/tea_party_2012_next_wave/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/20/tea_party_2012_next_wave/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>78</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate gets back to business of not getting business done</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/16/senate_dream_food/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/16/senate_dream_food/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orrin Hatch, R-Utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Coburn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/09/16/senate_dream_food</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Democrats plan action on immigration and food safety, GOP plans obstruction]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know there are nutty past statements by Republican Senate nominees to sift through, but out in our nation's capital, the nuts who already won their elections are getting back to work. The first order of business: To obstruct all business, and bemoan everyone's inability to get anything done.</p><p>First up, immigration reform. Democrats are again working on the DREAM Act, <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/97658/dream-act-refresher">which would provide a path to citizenship for young people</a> who came to America illegally as children, stayed out of trouble with the law, and spent at least two years in college or the military.</p><p>Reid is going to attach the DREAM Act to defense appropriation bill, which is a common, slightly dirty trick that represents one of the few ways to get anything voted on in our stupid Senate.</p><p>This bill would only help young, American-educated model citizens. Only about 825,000 people would probably become citizens. The act was proposed -- in 2001! -- by Republican Orrin Hatch. Even those lovable, Democrat-hating cranks <a href="http://reason.com/blog/2010/09/15/two-cheers-for-sen-harry-reid">at Reason like the bill.</a> In 2007, Hatch and Bob Bennett voted to add the act to the defense authorization bill.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/09/16/senate_dream_food/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/16/senate_dream_food/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Orrin Hatch defends Park51</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/31/orrin_hatch_supports_park51/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/31/orrin_hatch_supports_park51/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orrin Hatch, R-Utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Park51]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/08/31/orrin_hatch_supports_park51</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The conservative Utah senator not only understands, but is willing to publicly defend the Constitution]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It shouldn't be surprising that Orrin Hatch would defend the right of the Park51 organizers to build a mosque (or "mosque") on private property. The guy is one of the most prominent Mormons in the nation, and after their history of religious persecution, they ought to be finely attuned to scare mongering about religious minorities. But he's also a conservative Republican, and his fellow Latter Day Saints Harry Reid and Mitt Romney both punted on the issue. So this is nice to hear, from Sen. Hatch.</p><p><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/08/30/hatch-mosque-support/">Here's what he said to the Salt Lake City Fox affiliate</a>:</p><blockquote>
<p>HATCH: Let&#8217;s be honest about it, in the First Amendment, religious freedom, religious expression, that really express matters to the Constitution. So, if the Muslims own that property, that private property, and they want to build a mosque there, they should have the right to do so. The only question is are they being insensitive to those who suffered the loss of loved ones? We know there are Muslims killed on 9/11 too and we know it&#8217;s a great religion. &#8230; But as far as their right to build that mosque, they have that right.</p>
<p>I just think what&#8217;s made this country great is we have religious freedom. That&#8217;s not the only thing, but it&#8217;s one of the most important things in the Constitution. [...]</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a question of whether it&#8217;s too close to the 9/11 area, but it&#8217;s a few blocks away, it isn&#8217;t right there. &#8230; And there&#8217;s a huge, I think, lack of support throughout the country for Islam to build that mosque there, but that should not make a difference if they decide to do it. I&#8217;d be the first to stand up for their rights.</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/08/31/orrin_hatch_supports_park51/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/31/orrin_hatch_supports_park51/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP on Kagan: Will she fight for civil rights of rich, powerful?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/29/kagan_hearings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/29/kagan_hearings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche L. Lincoln, D-Ark.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blanche Lincoln vs. Bill Halter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elena Kagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Sessions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama's Supreme Court nomination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orrin Hatch, R-Utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/06/29/kagan_hearings</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republicans worry that Justice Kagan might not always rule on the side of corporations and the military]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, the Republican members of the Senate Judicial Committee opened the Elena Kagan confirmation hearings by, perhaps unwisely, putting Thurgood Marshall on trial. Today, they're laying off Marshall, but they're making it clear that they believe the court's job is to always defend the rights of the powerful.</p><p>Republicans <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/06/thurgood-marshall-takes-center-stage-at-kagan-hearings.php">brought Marshall up 35 times yesterday</a>, with <a href="http://wonkette.com/416347/vile-racist-scumbag-jeff-sessions-its-his-day-to-shine">unrepentant racist scumbag</a> Jeff Sessions and <a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/scocca/archive/2010/06/28/not-what-i-would-consider-mainstream-day-one-of-the-thurgood-marshall-impeachment-hearing.aspx">Arizona's Jon Kyl</a> leading the charge against that terrible activist liberal judge who hated the Constitution. (Later, asked to name any single Marshall decision or opinion they disagreed with, <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/06/thurgood-who-republicans-hard-pressed-to-disagree-with-marshall.php">Sessions and Orrin Hatch and Tom Coburn could not, really.</a> Because that would've given away the game.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/29/kagan_hearings/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/29/kagan_hearings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Senate&#8217;s war on the unemployed</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/16/war_on_unemployed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/16/war_on_unemployed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 14:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympia J. Snowe, R-Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orrin Hatch, R-Utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/06/16/war_on_unemployed</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Democrats oppose spending more on the jobless; Republicans just hate them]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because they are actually Rockefeller Republicans, "Moderate" Senate Democrats both oppose spending on the unemployed and raising revenue from the wealthy.</p><p>Harry Reid is attempting to get an already too small economic aid package through the Senate, but <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/15/AR2010061505569.html">apparently it is not good policy until we cut another $25 from the already paltry unemployment checks received by those lucky enough to still qualify to receive unemployment.</a></p><p>Take it away, responsible centrist Jon Tester:</p><blockquote>
<p>"It's going to be manipulated and worked over and dealt with," said Sen. Jon Tester (D-Mont.), who came up with the idea to trim unemployment checks. "But as it goes forward," he said, "we've got to look for ways to save money."</p>
</blockquote><p>Meanwhile, tax breaks for employed people and businesses remain in the legislation. Because everyone knows tax breaks don't count as spending, even though they have the exact same effect on the deficit, because raising money is the illegitimate and immoral way of dealing with the federal deficit.</p><p>Isn't that right, Olympia Snowe?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/16/war_on_unemployed/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/16/war_on_unemployed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wednesday link dump: Orrin you glad you&#8217;re not a Utah Republican?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/13/wednesday_link_dump_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/13/wednesday_link_dump_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 00:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Census]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arlen Specter, D-Pa.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orrin Hatch, R-Utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/05/12/wednesday_link_dump</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The target on Hatch's back, Rand Paul rides high, and don't worry about the deficit]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>A Fox News producer overheard a conversation between ex-Republican Senator Arlen Specter and current Republican Senator Orrin Hatch. Arlen says <a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NjE0MTY0MDIzNTI5OGE1ZGRiMGEzMmRhYTUxODkwNTE=">Orrin "better watch out" for the Club for Growth.</a></li>
<li>If you're <a href="http://wonkette.com/415390/california-guy-apologizes-for-not-being-clearer-when-he-said-he-wanted-to-shoot-all-liberals">going to advocate shooting liberals</a>, at least <a href="http://www.theawl.com/2010/05/stop-threatening-to-kill-people-over-the-internet">do it in person.</a></li>
<li>James Galbraith <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/05/galbraith_the_danger_posed_by.html">says we don't even need to worry about the long-term deficit.</a> Good enough for me!</li>
<li>Rand Paul <a href="http://www.whas11.com/community/blogs/political-blog/Rand-Paul-coasting-in-new-poll-93619929.html">is kicking ass</a> in the Kentucky Senate race.</li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/13/wednesday_link_dump_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/13/wednesday_link_dump_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Elena Kagan&#8217;s confirmation will distract the Senate for months</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/10/kagan_senate_preview/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/10/kagan_senate_preview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 15:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elena Kagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama's Supreme Court nomination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orrin Hatch, R-Utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/05/10/kagan_senate_preview</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The world's slowest deliberative body has its summer planned, and it's all about arguing over judicial activism]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last month, Mitch McConnell <a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/96895-seven-republicans-voted-for-kagan-last-year">more or less promised that the GOP wouldn't filibuster</a> President Obama's Supreme Court pick. Now he <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/84327/mitch-mcconnell-vows-fair-treatment-of-kagan">promises to treat Elena Kagan "fairly."</a> But the question isn't really whether Kagan will be confirmed (she will be); it's when it'll happen, and how much the fight will distract from all the other issues the Senate is trying to address before the midterms.</p><p><a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/96895-seven-republicans-voted-for-kagan-last-year">Seven Republicans voted</a> to confirm Kagan as Barack Obama's solicitor general: Oklahoma Sen. Tom Coburn, Maine's Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins, New Hampshire's Judd Gregg, Jon Kyl of Arizona,&#160; Orrin Hatch of Utah, and Indiana's Dick Lugar.</p><p>But the original support of these Republicans won't preclude them from attacking Kagan as a fine solicitor general who would be too radical for the Supreme Court.</p><p>Hatch -- who, a year ago, called Kagan "a brilliant lawyer" -- <a href="http://www.newser.com/article/d9fk1jr00/kagan-should-have-quick-path-to-confirmation-as-supreme-court-justice.html">is opening the door to opposition:</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/10/kagan_senate_preview/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/10/kagan_senate_preview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Orrin Hatch flip-flops on individual mandate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/26/hatch_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/26/hatch_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orrin Hatch, R-Utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/03/26/hatch</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Utah Republican, currently talking about evils of individual mandate, admits he supported one for political reasons]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When even Time's Mark Halperin is <a href="http://thepage.time.com/2010/03/26/breathtaking-cynicism/">labeling</a> a politician's comments "breathtaking cynicism," you know it's pretty bad. That's the case today, with comments that Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, made on CNN Thursday night.</p><p>Hatch has been opposing the individual mandate contained in the healthcare reform bill President Obama signed into law this week; he says it's unconstitutional. But, CNN's Campbell Brown pointed out, back in the 1990's, during the Clinton administration's reform efforts, Hatch supported a bill that contained a similar mandate.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/26/hatch_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/26/hatch_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sen. Byrd falls, taken to hospital</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/22/byrd_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/22/byrd_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orrin Hatch, R-Utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Byrd, D-W.Va.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/09/22/byrd</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Senate's oldest member has had health troubles recently, but is reportedly uninjured after a spill]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., was taken to an area hospital after falling at his home, <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/09/22/byrd-taken-to-the-hospital-after-fall/">CNN&#160;reports.</a> The network quotes the senator's spokesman as saying he "stood up too fast this morning and fell down."</p><p>Byrd's office is saying the trip to the hospital was just precautionary, and that he likely won't be admitted. But an ambulance was called, and the 91-year-old senator has had health issues recently; he was hospitalized earlier this year with a staph infection.&#160;He's currently the Senate's oldest member, and he's served in the body for more time than any other person in U.S. history.</p><p><strong>Update:</strong> Byrd actually was <a href="http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/09/22/senator-byrd-in-hospital-for-short-stay/">admitted</a> to the hospital, for a stay his staff is saying should last only for a few days.</p><p>"[U}pon examination, doctors found an elevated white-blood cell count which can be an early sign of an infection,&#8221; the senator's spokesman said in a statement. &#8220;Therefore, his doctors have determined that Byrd should remain in the hospital for antibiotic treatment and observation.&#8221;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/09/22/byrd_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/22/byrd_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Byrd wants healthcare bill to honor Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/27/byrd_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/27/byrd_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orrin Hatch, R-Utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Byrd, D-W.Va.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/08/26/byrd</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The West Virginian says his "heart and soul weeps" over his friend's death, as he wept for Kennedy last year]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The statement that Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., put out about the death of Ted Kennedy's death has attracted attention mainly for his call to name healthcare reform legislation after the late senator. That should get attention, as it's an interesting idea, one that could have serious political impact on the debate.</p><p>But what really struck me about Byrd's statement was the non-political part of it at the very beginning:&#160;"I had hoped and prayed that this day would never come. My heart and soul weeps at the loss of my best friend in the Senate, my beloved friend, Ted Kennedy."</p><p>Statements from politicians are, as a general rule, not exactly the most sincere things ever written. But there's no doubting Byrd's sincerity here, because last year, shortly after Kennedy was diagnosed with the cancer that would end up taking his life, Byrd spoke about his friend on the floor of the Senate. Whatever you feel about the two men and their politics, I&#160;think it's impossible not to be touched by what ensued, an all-too-rare truly, deeply human moment in Washington. Byrd breaks down talking about Kennedy's illness, and his heart and soul truly do appear to be weeping. The video is below.</p><p>
    <embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="240" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" src="http://www.necn.com/avp31.swf?`ob9mv1)ssQ,.#(-;U(X)K.R6[%20)^5*pdf/LJ$u~#a/kg1!(2|w})8(N(LvL=HL|Q%20%3CugzHU{B8vS(0LZM@b(`!O.uMcvCMS9hQ%20tI)/apTq&amp;HX3{`vNF&amp;NB%20v&amp;/DKI`Ju*.MgTz!lkf4r&amp;O:`&amp;Tys?'xDA)U'hW5%20O:2`@Cf.OSE_xf$fqzTJg*m{i*7q17GS{PHSp$;b;uCu%3C#0fO`rb(=$Q/S]]4yw@K%3CF;bNj.3v7aI`kh{=SC3s*o;!qM~j.9](52.D;YPdo!VuGN0NG" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="320" wmode="transparent"></embed>
  </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/08/27/byrd_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/27/byrd_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Byrd says Obama administration grabbing too much power</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/02/25/byrd_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/02/25/byrd_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orrin Hatch, R-Utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Byrd, D-W.Va.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/02/25/byrd</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a letter to the president, the veteran senator says new White House offices "can threaten the Constitutional system of checks and balances."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W. Va., is worried about a power grab by the Executive Branch -- not one that happened under the Bush administration, but one he believes is going on right now.</p><p>On Wednesday, the veteran senator wrote a letter to President Obama in which he criticizes the new administration's use of White House offices and "czars" to do work normally under the purview of officials who have to be confirmed by the Senate.</p><p>These new jobs &#8220;can threaten the Constitutional system of checks and balances. At the worst, White House staff have taken direction and control of programmatic areas that are the statutory responsibility of Senate-confirmed officials," Byrd said, <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0209/19303.html">according to Politico</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/02/25/byrd_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/02/25/byrd_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ted Kennedy suffers convulsions at luncheon</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/01/20/kennedy_9/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/01/20/kennedy_9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orrin Hatch, R-Utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Byrd, D-W.Va.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/01/20/kennedy</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Obama praises stricken senator. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senator Edward Kennedy suffered a <a href="http://blogs.abcnews.com/george/2009/01/kennedy-collaps.html">seizure</a> during the congressional luncheon honoring Barack Obama's inauguration just a few moments ago. Kennedy was at a table with Obama at the start of the luncheon.</p><p>Doctors <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2008/05/20/kennedy/index.html">discovered</a> a malignant tumor in Kennedy's brain this past May. CNN&#160;is reporting that paramedics are on the scene and that he's now in an ambulance after experiencing violent convulsions.</p><p>The new president opened his remarks at the lunch by expressing concern for the health of Kennedy -- or as he called him, "Teddy" -- and noting the senator's role in the struggle for civil rights.</p><p>According to the <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush/0109/Kennedy_and_Byrd_both_leave_lunch_with_medical_trouble.html">Politico's Glenn&#160;Thrush</a>, West Virginia Senator Robert Byrd also left the luncheon early with apparent medical troubles.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/01/20/kennedy_9/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/01/20/kennedy_9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Byrd endorses Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/05/19/byrd_obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/05/19/byrd_obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 17:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orrin Hatch, R-Utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Byrd, D-W.Va.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2008/05/19/byrd_obama</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The long-serving senator from West Virginia announces that he'll cast his superdelegate vote for Obama.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., has just announced that he's endorsing Barack Obama for president. In a statement, Byrd -- the longest-serving senator in U.S. history -- said:<br />
<blockquote>This Democratic primary campaign has been tough and competitive. I had no intention of involving myself in the Democratic campaign for President in the midst of West Virginia's primary election. But the stakes this November could not be higher. </p><p>After a great deal of thought, consideration and prayer over the situation in Iraq, I have decided that, as a superdelegate to the Democratic National Convention, I will cast my vote for Senator Barack Obama for President. Both Senators Clinton and Obama are extraordinary individuals, whose integrity, honor, love for this country and strong belief in our Constitution I deeply respect.</p><p>Byrd's endorsement carries some symbolism beyond just his lengthy tenure. As Republicans are fond of pointing out, Byrd was once a member of the Ku Klux Klan; indeed, in the early 1940s, he was a leader of his local chapter. He has spent many years since apologizing for his membership in the Klan: In 2005, he said, "I know now I was wrong. Intolerance had no place in America. I apologized a thousand times ... and I don't mind apologizing over and over again. I can't erase what happened."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/05/19/byrd_obama/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/05/19/byrd_obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why we fight?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/05/09/resolution_11/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/05/09/resolution_11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 15:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orrin Hatch, R-Utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Byrd, D-W.Va.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Gates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2007/05/09/resolution</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The defense secretary says he doesn't know whether the use-of-force authorization for Iraq covers the war the United States is fighting today.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sens. Hillary Clinton and Robert Byrd have <a href="http://byrd.senate.gov/newsroom/news_may/byrd_clinton_call_for_ending_2002_iraq_resolution.html">proposed</a> a repeal of the 2002 resolution by which Congress authorized George W. Bush to use force in <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/iraq_war/index.html">Iraq</a>. At a Senate appropriations hearing today, Byrd asked Defense Secretary Robert Gates if he believed that the use-of-force resolution still applied at all. </p><p><b>Byrd:</b> Secretary Gates, the 2002 authorization to use force in Iraq authorized the president to use force for two purposes ... The first was to defend the national security of the United States "against the continuing threat posed by Iraq." The second was to "enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions against Iraq." Since the government of Iraq that is referred to in the resolution no longer exists, having been replaced by a democratically elected one, do you agree ... that this authorization no longer applies to the ongoing conflict in Iraq? </p><p><b>Gates:</b> I think the honest answer, Sen. Byrd, is that I don't know the answer to that question. </p><p><b>Byrd:</b> That's being honest. Therefore, if you don't know the answer -- how does it apply if you don't know the answer? </p><p><b>Gates: </b> Well, sir, my impression is that it's the view of the president that it still continues to authorize the actions that we are taking in Iraq. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/05/09/resolution_11/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/05/09/resolution_11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Congress can end the war without hurting the troops</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/04/02/feingold_reid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/04/02/feingold_reid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 15:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain, R-Ariz.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orrin Hatch, R-Utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Byrd, D-W.Va.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Somalia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2007/04/02/feingold_reid</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sen. Reid and I are introducing a bill that would require President Bush to begin redeployment and effectively end our military mission in Iraq by March 31, 2008.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many Americans remember the tragic deaths of U.S. troops in Somalia in the early 1990s, vividly portrayed in the movie "Blackhawk Down." Those 18 service members died in a misguided, poorly defined military mission that had dragged on without an end date and without the support of the American people. </p><p>As Congress debates the war in Iraq, the congressional debate over Somalia 14 years ago has some surprising parallels. Without question, Somalia in 1993 differs in many ways from Iraq in 2007, from the scope of the mission to the reason for that mission in the first place. What hasn't changed, however, is Congress' constitutional power to end a military mission, and its ability to use that power without endangering the safety of our brave troops. </p><p>That is exactly what Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/russ_feingold/">I</a> propose to do with legislation we will introduce when the Senate reconvenes next week. Our bill would require the president to begin safely redeploying U.S. troops out of Iraq in 120 days, with redeployment to be completed by March 31, 2008. After March, funding for the war in Iraq would be cut off, with three narrow exceptions -- targeted counterterrorism operations, protection of U.S. personnel and infrastructure, and training and equipping Iraqi forces. In other words, the current military mission in Iraq would be effectively ended. Sen. Reid has said he will work to make sure the Senate votes on our bill by the end of May. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/04/02/feingold_reid/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/04/02/feingold_reid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Hillary Clinton should have known</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/02/26/clinton_aumf/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/02/26/clinton_aumf/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orrin Hatch, R-Utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Byrd, D-W.Va.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Ritter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/02/26/clinton_aumf</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The presidential candidate claims that if she knew then what she knows now, she wouldn't have voted for war. But others knew.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Almost four years after the U.S. invasion of <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/iraq">Iraq,</a> the war there remains the single most important issue of the campaign for the 2008 presidential election. On the Democratic side, two of the front-runners -- <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/barack_obama">Sen. Barack Obama,</a> D-Ill., and former <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/john_edwards">Sen. John Edwards,</a> D-N.C. -- have managed to stake out positions as war opponents. Obama, who was still a state legislator at the time Congress voted to authorize the use of force, <a target="new" href="http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Barack_Obama's_Iraq_Speech">vehemently</a> opposed the war. And Edwards, who as a senator did vote for the war, has apologized for that action, which seems to have gotten him off the hook with many voters. Only <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/hillary_clinton">Sen. Hillary Clinton,</a> D-N.Y., remains resolute about her vote for the war, admitting she wouldn't do it again, but refusing to apologize for it. It's an issue that has, so far, dogged her with voters. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/02/26/clinton_aumf/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/02/26/clinton_aumf/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>114</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meanwhile, a word about impeachment</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/04/26/byrd_7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/04/26/byrd_7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 20:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orrin Hatch, R-Utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Byrd, D-W.Va.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2006/04/26/byrd</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robert Byrd wants the president to remember that the Senate "can send you home."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We've been locked into the <a href="/politics/war_room/2006/04/26/rove3/index.html">indictment watch</a> today, but there's always time for checking in on that other I-word. As lawmakers in <a target= "new" href="http://www.boston.com/news/local/vermont/articles/2006/04/26/vermont_lawmakers_introduce_impeachment_resolution/">Vermont and Illinois</a> mount from-the-ground-up efforts to impeach George W. Bush, <a target= "new" href="http://www.democrats.com/node/8720">Democrats.com</a> points us to this small nugget from <a target= "new" href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?r109:S24AP6-0011:">a speech</a> about the role of the Senate Robert Byrd gave upon returning to Washington Monday: </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/04/26/byrd_7/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/04/26/byrd_7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A third Democrat for Alito</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/01/26/byrd_6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/01/26/byrd_6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orrin Hatch, R-Utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Byrd, D-W.Va.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2006/01/26/byrd</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As progressives cling to hope for a filibuster, the AP says Robert Byrd will vote to confirm Bush's nominee.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Progressives are still <a target= "new" href="http://www.democrats.com/">clinging to hope</a> that Democrats will still rise up to filibuster the nomination of Samuel Alito, but the nominee just picked up the support of another Democrat: The <a target= "new" href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=1545105">Associated Press</a> is reporting that Robert Byrd will join Tim Johnson and Ben Nelson in voting to confirm.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/01/26/byrd_6/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/01/26/byrd_6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

