<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Pacific Standard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/pacific_standard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 11:56:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Hey, GOP: Mexican immigrants aren&#8217;t necessarily Democrats</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/take_note_gop_not_all_mexican_immigrants_are_democrats_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/take_note_gop_not_all_mexican_immigrants_are_democrats_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexican immigrants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13347672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research suggests they're all over the political spectrum -- and that right-wingers are more likely to vote]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> Once you get past all of the posturing, <a href="http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2013/06/immigration-reform" target="_blank">opposition to immigration reform</a> among congressional Republicans is at least partially based on self-preservation. There is a widespread belief that Mexican immigrants who become citizens are overwhelmingly disposed to vote Democratic.</p><p><a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261379413000802" target="_blank">Newly published research</a> suggests that’s a complete misreading of the facts. According to this analysis, politically engaged Mexicans who move to the U.S. fall all over the ideological spectrum, very much like native-born Americans.</p><p>What’s more, according to University of Nebraska-Lincoln political scientist <a href="http://polisci.unl.edu/dr-sergio-wals" target="_blank">Sergio Wals</a>, those on the right are more inclined to participate in the American electoral process than those on the left.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/take_note_gop_not_all_mexican_immigrants_are_democrats_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/take_note_gop_not_all_mexican_immigrants_are_democrats_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You are how you sneeze</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/30/you_are_how_you_sneeze_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/30/you_are_how_you_sneeze_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2013 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allergies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Hirsch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13340489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Chicago neurologist argues that the way we expel air is indicative of our underlying personality]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> Are you one of those people who just sneezes out into the open air and then goes about living your life like nothing disgusting just happened? If so, you are sick, and it needs to stop. It also tells me that you are a germ-spraying bio-warhead who either does not concern him/herself with the health of others or delights in the pleasure of other people’s immune systems breaking down.</p><p>But, what does your actual sneeze—the sound, the volume, the frequency—say about you? A Chicago neurologist is <a href="http://bodyodd.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/04/23/17813431-what-your-sneeze-says-about-your-personality" target="_blank">trying to figure that out</a>:</p><blockquote><p>“Sneezes are like laughter,” says Dr. Alan Hirsch, a neurologist, psychiatrist, and founder of the Smell &amp; Taste Treatment and Research Foundation in Chicago. “Some [laughs] are loud, some are soft. And it’s similar with sneezing. It will often be the same from youth onward in terms of what it sounds like.”</p> <p>Hirsch says he doesn’t know of any studies that have been conducted on various sneezing styles and what they might mean, but says he does believe the way we sneeze reflects some component of the personality.</p> <p>“It’s more of a psychological thing and represents the underlying personality or character structure,” he says.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/30/you_are_how_you_sneeze_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/30/you_are_how_you_sneeze_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Mozart helps you focus</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/study_mozart_helps_you_focus_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/study_mozart_helps_you_focus_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 18:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13337838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research shows people work better and faster when listening to the soothing sounds of his minuets]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a></p><p>Score another one for Wolfgang Amadeus. <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23778307" target="_blank">Researchers report</a> the soothing sounds of a Mozart minuet boosts the ability of children and seniors to focus on a task and ignore extraneous information.</p><p>Dissonant music has the opposite effect, according to <a href="http://community.frontiersin.org/people/_NobuoMasataka/11411" target="_blank">Nobuo Masataka</a> of Japan’s Kyoto University and <a href="http://www.leonid-perlovsky.com/" target="_blank">Leonard Perlovsky</a> of Harvard University. Their findings help make the case that music, sometimes thought of as a pleasant byproduct of evolution, has in fact played an active role in human development.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/study_mozart_helps_you_focus_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/study_mozart_helps_you_focus_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the South more racist than the North?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/symbolic_racism_may_be_taking_over_the_south_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/symbolic_racism_may_be_taking_over_the_south_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 21:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paula Deen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southerners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Symbolic racism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13336615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Study finds "Southerners are more likely than Northerners to use prejudice in making political decisions"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> The New York Times recently ran a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/23/us/in-the-south-many-are-willing-to-forgive-deens-racial-misstep.html?pagewanted=all&amp;_r=0">story</a> describing the Savannah, Ga., defenders of Paula Deen. Deen, of course, is the recently disgraced television chef who was fired by the Food Network due to her admissions of casually using racial slurs and planning an antebellum plantation-themed wedding for her brother. The Times<em>’ </em>story is laden with quotes from a number of white Southern patrons of Deen’s restaurant offering defenses of their region and some barbs for their Northern critics. For example,</p><blockquote><p>“Everybody in the South over 60 used the N-word at some time or the other in the past.”</p> <p>“I don’t understand why some people can use [the N-word] and others can’t.”</p> <p>“We have lived with each other and loved each other here for a long time. Sometimes I think there is more prejudice in the North than there is in the South.”</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/symbolic_racism_may_be_taking_over_the_south_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/symbolic_racism_may_be_taking_over_the_south_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>336</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why don&#8217;t we use condoms for oral sex?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/why_dont_we_use_condoms_for_oral_sex_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/why_dont_we_use_condoms_for_oral_sex_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Condoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oral sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HPV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Douglas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerome Groopman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13335549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We really should, but the numbers show that almost no one does]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> I remember my 27th birthday party better than I remember most parties, mostly because of a guy who wasn’t even there. That week’s <em>New Yorker</em> included a <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2012/10/01/121001fa_fact_groopman?currentPage=all" target="_blank">feature</a> by Jerome Groopman, who warned of a new antibiotic-resistant strain of gonorrhea colonizing the throats of hosts from Japan to Sweden: “the harbinger of a sexually transmitted global epidemic.” Everyone was talking about it. Couples clung tighter, singles tried to shrug it off, silently praying they could pair off before this latest nastiness hit our shores. The rueful consensus was that no one in attendance—no matter their gender, race, sexual proclivities, or relationship status—regularly used condoms for oral sex.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/why_dont_we_use_condoms_for_oral_sex_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/why_dont_we_use_condoms_for_oral_sex_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>108</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is obesity a disease?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/22/being_fat_is_a_disease_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/22/being_fat_is_a_disease_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jun 2013 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obesity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Medical Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BMI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13333092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The American Medical Association's new classification for the condition is the subject of heavy controversy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> <em>Disease: a disordered or incorrectly functioning organ, part, structure, or system of the body resulting from the effect of genetic or developmental errors, infection, poisons, nutritional deficiency or imbalance, toxicity, or unfavorable environmental factors; illness; sickness; ailment.</em></p><p>“Overweight and obesity are defined as abnormal or excessive fat accumulation that presents a risk to health,” according to both the <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/" target="_blank">Centers for Disease Control</a> and the <a href="http://www.who.int/en/" target="_blank">World Health Organization</a>. “A crude population measure of obesity is the body mass index (BMI), a person’s weight (in kilograms) divided by the square of his or her height (in meters). A person with a BMI of 30 or more is generally considered obese. A person with a BMI equal to or more than 25 is considered overweight.”</p><p>So is obesity a disease?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/22/being_fat_is_a_disease_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/22/being_fat_is_a_disease_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dim lighting sparks creativity</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/dim_lighting_sparks_creativity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/dim_lighting_sparks_creativity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 18:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lighting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13332107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New German research finds a darkened room encourages freedom of thought and inspires innovation]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> There are certain times when you want the lights turned way down low. One such time, according to <a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494413000261" target="_blank">recent research</a>, is when you need to think creatively.</p><p>“Darkness increases freedom from constraints, which in turn promotes creativity,” report  <a href="http://www.people-inside.de/index.php?&amp;page=816" target="_blank">Anna Steidle</a> of the University of Stuttgart and Lioba Werth of the University of Hohenheim. A dimly lit environment, they explain in the <em>Journal of Environmental Psychology,</em> “elicits a feeling of freedom, self-determination, and reduced inhibition,” all of which encourage innovative thinking.</p><p>Steidle and Werth describe six experiments which provide evidence for their thesis. The key one featured 114 German undergraduates, who were seated in groups of two or three in a small room designed to simulate an office.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/dim_lighting_sparks_creativity/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/dim_lighting_sparks_creativity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Millennials likely aren&#8217;t as conservative as they think</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/millennials_likely_arent_as_conservative_as_they_think_they_are_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/millennials_likely_arent_as_conservative_as_they_think_they_are_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 15:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[millennials]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13329596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research suggests a disconnect between how young people identify politically and their actual stances on issues]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> Conservatism the brand seems to be faring better than conservatism the philosophy. That’s the conclusion of <a href="http://spp.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/06/12/1948550613492825.abstract" target="_blank">new research</a> that finds a serious disconnect between the way people under 30 identify themselves politically, and their actual stances on the issues.</p><p>In three experiments described in the journal <em>Social Psychological and Personality Science,</em> researchers found “a systematic bias among young adults to perceive themselves as somewhat more conservative than they actually are.”</p><p>“Commentators have presumed that America is a ‘center-right’ nation,” write psychologists <a href="http://zell.socialpsychology.org/" target="_blank">Ethan Zell</a> of the University of North Carolina-Greensboro and <a href="http://www.abington.psu.edu/academics/faculty/dr-michael-bernstein" target="_blank">Michael Bernstein</a> of Pennsylvania State University-Abington. “The present findings challenge this assumption.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/millennials_likely_arent_as_conservative_as_they_think_they_are_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/millennials_likely_arent_as_conservative_as_they_think_they_are_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I failed a Mensa test &#8212; twice</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/im_not_smart_enough_for_mensa_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/im_not_smart_enough_for_mensa_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mensa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iq tests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13327162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I tried to become a member of the exclusive society, and all I got was a lousy number 2 pencil]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a>American Mensa, an organization that admits people with an IQ in the top two percent of the population, <a href="http://www.us.mensa.org/AML/assets/File/AML/MediaKit/MensaPressKit-ABOUT.pdf">claims nearly 60,000 members</a>, including more than 2,300 in the Greater New York area (and <a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2013/04/toddler-mensa-member-are-more-common-than-you-think/64562/">a bunch of toddlers</a>).</p><p>On a Saturday morning in late May, I went to see if I could become one of them.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/im_not_smart_enough_for_mensa_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/im_not_smart_enough_for_mensa_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Reading novels makes us better thinkers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/15/book_nerds_make_better_decisions_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/15/book_nerds_make_better_decisions_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[study]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13324327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research says reading literary fiction helps people embrace ambiguous ideas and avoid snap judgments]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a></p><p>Are you uncomfortable with ambiguity? It’s a common condition, but a highly problematic one. The compulsion to quell that unease can inspire snap judgments, rigid thinking, and bad decision-making.</p><p>Fortunately, <a href="http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10400419.2013.783735#preview" target="_blank">new research</a> suggests a simple anecdote for this affliction: Read more literary fiction.</p><p>A trio of University of Toronto scholars, led by psychologist <a href="http://www.rotman.utoronto.ca/FacultyAndResearch/Faculty/InstructorBios/Maja%20Djikic.aspx" target="_blank">Maja Djikic</a>, report that people who have just read a short story have less need for what psychologists call “cognitive closure.” Compared with peers who have just read an essay, they expressed more comfort with disorder and uncertainty—attitudes that allow for both sophisticated thinking and greater creativity.</p><p>“Exposure to literature,” the researchers write in the <em>Creativity Research Journal,</em> “may offer a (way for people) to become more likely to open their minds.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/15/book_nerds_make_better_decisions_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/15/book_nerds_make_better_decisions_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Could the Night Stalker have terrorized Los Angeles today?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/09/could_the_night_stalker_have_terrorized_los_angeles_today_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/09/could_the_night_stalker_have_terrorized_los_angeles_today_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2013 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[True crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Serial killers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Murders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[richard ramirez]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13320492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the 1980s, Angelenos lived in constant fear of serial killer Richard Ramirez. Since then, the city has changed]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a>News that Richard Ramirez died in prison today at age 53 will provoke reactions in anyone who lived in Los Angeles in the ’80s. What sort of reaction will vary. Ramirez, a serial killer the Southern California press dubbed the “Night Stalker,” carried off a string of particularly gruesome murders in 1985. The L.A. of that year was a city whose police chief, Daryl Gates, was a <a href="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/lapd/interviews/gates.html">deeply controversial</a> figure. Gates had come up through the ranks as a detective on the spectacular Manson Family and Hillside Strangler cases. He had become a fan of overtly military tactics, and, faced with the emergence of L.A.’s crack epidemic, found his metier. Charges of excessive force and racism dogged his administration (the Rodney King beating would happen on his watch).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/09/could_the_night_stalker_have_terrorized_los_angeles_today_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/09/could_the_night_stalker_have_terrorized_los_angeles_today_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Liberals, conservatives see mixed-race people differently</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/09/liberals_conservatives_see_mixed_race_people_differently_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/09/liberals_conservatives_see_mixed_race_people_differently_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[studies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13319847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Research suggests right-wingers are more likely to interpret racially ambiguous faces as black rather than white]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a>Did you notice that mixed-race gentleman who passed you on the sidewalk yesterday? During the split second as he walked by, did he register in your mind as black or white?</p><p><a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103113001054" target="_blank">Disturbing new research</a> suggests the answer to that question may depend on your political ideology.</p><p>In three experiments, “we found that conservatives were more likely than liberals to categorize a racially ambiguous person as black than white,” a research team led by New York University psychologist <a href="http://social-neuroscience.org/people/students" target="_blank">Amy Krosch</a> writes in the <em>Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.</em></p><p>Intriguingly, this dynamic disappeared when the study participants—white Americans—were told they were judging Canadian faces. The tendency for those on the right to more quickly categorize someone as “black” only occurred when they were evaluating their fellow countrymen.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/09/liberals_conservatives_see_mixed_race_people_differently_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/09/liberals_conservatives_see_mixed_race_people_differently_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samantha Power: I&#8217;m a &#8220;humanitarian hawk&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/06/samantha_power_im_a_humanitarian_hawk_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/06/samantha_power_im_a_humanitarian_hawk_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 12:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samantha Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13318663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The next ambassador to the UN reflects on the need to combat genocide and other human rights abuses]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> President Obama <a href="http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/06/05/18776098-samantha-power-white-houses-un-ambassador-nominee-has-seen-evil-at-its-worst?lite" target="_blank">nominated</a> Samantha Power to be the next American ambassador to the United Nations on Wednesday. As a journalist, academic, and sometime presidential advisor, she has consistently argued in favor of international action to prevent genocide and other abuses of human rights. She discussed her philosophy—and the role of the U.N.—in a 2008 interview with <em>Miller-McCune</em> magazine, the precursor to <em>Pacific Standard</em>, which we’ve reproduced below.</p><p>Samantha Power teaches at Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government, and it’s worth noting her official title: “Professor of Practice of Global Leadership and Public Policy.” As a teacher, Pulitzer Prize-winning writer and until recently a senior adviser to Barack Obama, she has focused on how leadership can be effectively exercised in an increasingly fragmented world.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/06/samantha_power_im_a_humanitarian_hawk_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/06/samantha_power_im_a_humanitarian_hawk_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why you should stop watching TV while you eat</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/04/distraction_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/04/distraction_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 20:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychological Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netherlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sugar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[junk food]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13317279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new study finds we're less satisfied by sweet, salty and sour treats when we're mentally distracted]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> Our eating habits have changed radically in recent decades, in at least two distinct ways. We increasingly multitask as we consume our meals, munching as we work at our desk or <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15000965?dopt=Abstract" target="_blank">watch television</a>. And, to the dismay of nutritionists, our food has higher concentrations of <a href="http://www.psmag.com/health/robert-lustig-sugar-obesity-diet-50948/" target="_blank">sugar</a> and <a href="http://www.psmag.com/health/stop-worrying-about-salt-reduction-58334/" target="_blank">salt</a>.</p><p><a href="http://pss.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/05/29/0956797612471953.abstract" target="_blank">New research</a> from the Netherlands suggests the two phenomena may be directly related.</p><p>A study just published in the journal <em>Psychological Science</em> finds people eating or drinking while mentally distracted require greater concentrations of sweetness, sourness, or saltiness to feel satisfied. A slightly sweet dish may be delicious when you’re concentrating on each bite, but it tastes bland if you’re eating while your attention is divided.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/04/distraction_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/04/distraction_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet addiction is just the next evolutionary step</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/internet_addiction_is_just_the_next_evolutionary_step_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/internet_addiction_is_just_the_next_evolutionary_step_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 15:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[addiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reddit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13313894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research reveals that the uncontrollable desire to click may be a part of our biological makeup]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> Having trouble shutting down your computer? Can’t stop refreshing your Facebook and Twitter streams? Did you close Reddit in your browser window … only to open Reddit right back up again? If you’re concerned that your Internet use is becoming a compulsion, you’re probably right: New research suggests that our uncontrollable desire to click may be deeply rooted in human evolution.</p><p>“The Internet is not <a href="http://www.livescience.com/28409-zap-a-cocaine-addiction-with-lasers.html">addictive</a> in the same way as pharmacological substances are,” cognitive scientist Tom Stafford at the University of Sheffield in the U.K. told Tia Ghose at <a href="http://www.livescience.com/34649-why-internet-is-addictive.html">LiveScience</a> “But it’s compulsive; it’s compelling; it’s distracting.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/internet_addiction_is_just_the_next_evolutionary_step_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/internet_addiction_is_just_the_next_evolutionary_step_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mass killers have always been heartthrobs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/mass_killers_have_always_been_heartthrobs_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/mass_killers_have_always_been_heartthrobs_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 22:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haymarket Bomber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Franz Ferdinand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dzhokhar Tsarnaev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tumblr]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13312304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Long before #freejahar, women swooned over the Haymarket bomber and Franz Ferdinand's assassin]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> Michelle Legro runs a website called <a href="http://mydaguerreotypeboyfriend.tumblr.com/">My Daguerreotype Boyfriend</a>, a Tumblr where readers can submit photos of really attractive and long dead men. One of the men featured is <a href="http://mydaguerreotypeboyfriend.tumblr.com/post/7264030400/louis-lingg-german-anarchist-arrested-in">this guy</a>.</p><p>That’s Louis Lingg, the German anarchist partially responsible for the 1886 Haymarket Bombing. Haymarket started as a labor demonstration. When the police came in to break up the demonstration someone threw a dynamite bomb at them. Seven police officers, and four other people, were killed in the event. Investigators later discovered dynamite bombs in Lingg’s apartment. He was arrested and tried with seven other anarchists.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/mass_killers_have_always_been_heartthrobs_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/mass_killers_have_always_been_heartthrobs_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Compassion is a trainable skill</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/28/compassion_is_a_trainable_learnable_skill_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/28/compassion_is_a_trainable_learnable_skill_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 20:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compassion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[altruism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Wisconsin-Madison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychological Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13311035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Study published in the journal Psychological Science shows that compassion and altruism are learnable   ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a><br /> Can people be taught to act more altruistically? <a href="http://pss.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/05/20/0956797612469537.abstract" target="_blank">Newly published research</a>, measuring both brain activity and behavior, suggests the answer just may be yes.</p><p>“Our findings support the possibility that compassion and altruism can be viewed as trainable skills rather than stable traits,” a research team led by <a href="http://psyphz.psych.wisc.edu/web/personnel/director.html" target="_blank">Richard J. Davidson</a>and <a href="http://psyphz.psych.wisc.edu/web/personnel/grads.html" target="_blank">Helen Weng</a> of the University of Wisconsin-Madison writes in the journal <em>Psychological Science</em>.</p><p>Specifically, they report that taking a course in compassion leads to increased engagement of certain neural systems, which prompts higher levels of altruistic behavior.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/28/compassion_is_a_trainable_learnable_skill_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/28/compassion_is_a_trainable_learnable_skill_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is salt really so bad for you?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/27/is_salt_really_so_bad_for_your_health_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/27/is_salt_really_so_bad_for_your_health_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cardiovascular Morbidity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dietary Goals for the United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George McGovern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13308904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Decades of science show no conclusive evidence that cutting back on dietary sodium reduces cardiovascular morbidity]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> No salt, low salt, salt free, heart-healthy salt substitution–any added salt will hurt your constitution. It reads like some bizarre, Seussian tale. Excepting that we’ve heard it not from the good Dr. Geisel but from the medical community and public health advocates everywhere. We watch as celebrity chefs take the salt elimination cooking challenge to prepare an “improved healthy” cuisine. Self-anointed “experts” cadge, coax, and cajole us to decrease our salt, or, more specifically, sodium intake. If that doesn’t work then the specter of heart attacks and strokes is unleashed upon us, along with a dash of fire and brimstone for good measure. It is, after all, clearly in our best personal and the greater public interest.</p><p>The hypothesis is sound and the supporting data is impeccable, right?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/27/is_salt_really_so_bad_for_your_health_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/27/is_salt_really_so_bad_for_your_health_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You only hate grad school because you think you&#8217;re supposed to</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/26/you_only_hate_grad_school_because_you_think_youre_supposed_to_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/26/you_only_hate_grad_school_because_you_think_youre_supposed_to_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graduate School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New Yorker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13308432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So many publications are bashing the experience that dissatisfaction has almost become a self-fulfilling prophecy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> It’s almost impossible to miss. <a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/life/culturebox/2013/04/there_are_no_academic_jobs_and_getting_a_ph_d_will_make_you_into_a_horrible.html" target="_blank">So</a> <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/books/2013/04/graduate-school-advice-impossible-decision.html">much</a> <a href="http://orgtheory.wordpress.com/2013/04/18/seriously-dont-go-to-graduate-school/">gloom</a> <a href="http://100rsns.blogspot.com/">has</a> <a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/francesbridges/2012/02/17/why-you-shouldnt-go-to-grad-school/">been</a> <a href="http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2013/04/grad_school_may_not_be_the_best_way.html">cast</a> <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/today/post/article/20130510195922-5973711-don-t-go-to-grad-school">upon</a> <a href="http://sundial.csun.edu/2013/05/grad-school-may-not-be-for-everyone/">graduate</a> <a href="http://www.collegian.com/2013/04/30/keep-calm-and-dont-apply-to-graduate-school/">school</a> lately — and much of it is rooted in very real, very rational concerns about the bleak state of the academic job market. But I want to approach the topic of graduate school not from the cost-benefit standpoint of whether or not it will lead to academic employment. I don’t think it is possible to formulate any sort of useful blanket opinions on graduate school that do not take into account discipline-, institution- and person-specific idiosyncrasies. However, I do feel capable of conducting a thought experiment on some highly generalizable beliefs about the “grad school experience.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/26/you_only_hate_grad_school_because_you_think_youre_supposed_to_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/26/you_only_hate_grad_school_because_you_think_youre_supposed_to_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the Environmental Defense Fund ruining environmentalism?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/25/is_the_environmental_defense_fund_ruining_environmentalism_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/25/is_the_environmental_defense_fund_ruining_environmentalism_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13308509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sixty-eight grassroots groups are protesting the organization's decision to join a coalition of oil companies]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> The battle over hydraulic fracking of oil and natural gas has pitted land owners against each other. It has also created divides between neighboring states such as Pennsylvania, Ohio and New York. And now, after the Environmental Defense Fund joined a coalition of nonprofits and oil companies called the Center for Sustainable Shale Development, fracking is also <a href="http://stateimpact.npr.org/pennsylvania/2013/05/21/fractures-in-the-anti-fracking-movement/" target="_blank">splitting the environmental community</a>.</p><p>The Center for Shale Development advocates that oil and gas companies voluntarily adopt 15 performance standards. These cover wastewater disposal, fracking fluids, air pollution standards for drill engines, limits on gas flaring in the fields and more. But this week, 68 grassroots groups <a href="http://www.civilsocietyinstitute.org/frackingEDF/" target="_blank">protested</a> the Environmental Defense Fund’s move, arguing the big environmental advocacy organization had allowed itself to be “co-opted by industry interests,” and that it was engaged in “greenwashing.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/25/is_the_environmental_defense_fund_ruining_environmentalism_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/25/is_the_environmental_defense_fund_ruining_environmentalism_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>