<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Pacific Standard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/pacific_standard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 03:47:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Are millennials delusional?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/study_millennials_are_lazy_have_unrealistic_expectations_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/study_millennials_are_lazy_have_unrealistic_expectations_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 18:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[millennials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research suggests that members of "Generation Me" are warped by a profound sense of entitlement]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a>Young people coming of age over the past decade or so have been referred to as Millennials, or, in a nod to their individualistic nature, <a href="http://eubie.com/genme.pdf" target="_blank">Generation Me</a>.</p><p><a href="http://psp.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/05/01/0146167213484586.abstract" target="_blank">Newly published research</a> suggests they could also be called the generation with unrealistic expectations.</p><p>An analysis of the values and ambitions of American 12th graders finds “a growing discrepancy between the desire for material rewards and the willingness to do the work usually required to earn them.” Psychologists <a href="http://www.psychology.sdsu.edu/people/jean-twenge/" target="_blank">Jean Twenge</a> of San Diego State University and <a href="http://www.knox.edu/academics/faculty/kasser-tim.html" target="_blank">Tim Kasser</a> of Knox College report that, for high school seniors in 2005, 2006, and 2007, materialism remained at historically high levels, even as commitment to hard work declined.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/study_millennials_are_lazy_have_unrealistic_expectations_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/study_millennials_are_lazy_have_unrealistic_expectations_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>180</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do atheists secretly believe in God?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/do_atheists_secretly_believe_in_god_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/do_atheists_secretly_believe_in_god_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[God]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13283250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Finnish study suggests that non-believers become emotionally aroused when daring God to harm their loved ones]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a>The heads and hearts of atheists may not be on precisely the same page. That’s the implication of <a href="http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10508619.2013.771991" target="_blank">recently published research</a> from Finland, which finds avowed non-believers become emotionally aroused when daring God to do terrible things.</p><p>“The results imply that atheists’ attitudes toward God are ambivalent, in that their explicit beliefs conflict with their affective response,” concludes a research team led by University of Helsinki psychologist <a href="http://www.psyko.helsinki.fi/psyko/Psykolog.nsf/Personnel/LindemanMarjaana?OpenDocument" target="_blank">Marjaana Lindeman</a>. Its study is published in the <em>International Journal for the Psychology of Religion.</em></p><p>Lindeman and her colleagues describe two small-scale experiments. The first featured 17 Finns, recruited online, who expressed high levels of belief, or disbelief, in God. They read out loud a series of statements while skin conductance data was collected via electrodes placed on two of their fingers.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/do_atheists_secretly_believe_in_god_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/do_atheists_secretly_believe_in_god_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>213</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can yoga boost your immune system?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/can_yoga_boost_your_immune_system_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/can_yoga_boost_your_immune_system_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 16:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yoga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oslo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norway]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13282974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research suggests that practicing yoga produces internal changes on a genetic level]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> If we’re finished obsessing about <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2013/03/the-great-lululemon-panic-its-not-just-about-the-see-through-pants/274156/" target="_blank">yoga jeans</a>, perhaps it’s time to think about yoga and genes.</p><p><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0061910" target="_blank">Newly published research</a> from Norway suggests that a comprehensive yoga program rapidly produces internal changes on a genetic level. The results help explain the <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3193654/" target="_blank">well-documented health benefits</a> of this ancient practice.</p><p>“These data suggest that previously reported (therapeutic) effects of yoga practices have an integral physiological component at the molecular level, which is initiated immediately during practice,” writes a research team led by Fahri Saatcioglu of the University of Oslo. The team’s study is published in the online journal <em>PLOS ONE</em>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/can_yoga_boost_your_immune_system_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/can_yoga_boost_your_immune_system_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>End of the dollar menu?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/fast_food_chains_might_do_away_with_dollar_menus_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/fast_food_chains_might_do_away_with_dollar_menus_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 20:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fast food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McDonalds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[burger kind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nutrition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13281916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Value meals aren't just bad for your cholesterol, they're taking a toll on their franchises' bottom lines   ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a>“Value menus” increasingly seem a bad physical deal for consumers—and now perhaps a bum fiscal deal for fast-food purveyors. The cheap chow, long a target for nutrition-focused researchers and  locavoring  advocates, has been criticized for all manner of bad outcomes, mostly <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2009/04/23/the-economics-of-eating.html" target="_blank">centered on obesity</a>. <a href="http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&amp;aid=8820430" target="_blank">Fast food in general is assailed</a> by these same sources, of course—the book is <em>Fast Food Nation</em>, after all, and not <em>Dollar Menu Dominion</em>—but value menus (and their late cousin “supersize”) are seen as particularly egregious in making fat-laden crappy food—despite all the <a href="http://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?collection=journals&amp;handle=hein.journals/lyclr23&amp;div=27&amp;id=&amp;page=" target="_blank">menu labeling</a>, <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0061081" target="_blank">soda shrinking</a>, <a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1038/oby.2004.64/full" target="_blank">portion bashing</a>, and <a href="http://www.psmag.com/health/big-soda-the-usda-and-school-food-4692/" target="_blank">bad mouthing</a> in the world— irresistibly cheap.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/fast_food_chains_might_do_away_with_dollar_menus_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/fast_food_chains_might_do_away_with_dollar_menus_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is mental health seasonal?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/21/study_depression_and_anxiety_may_be_more_seasonal_than_we_think_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/21/study_depression_and_anxiety_may_be_more_seasonal_than_we_think_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2013 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mental health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anxiety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seasonal affective disorder]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13276553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New Google-based research suggests that we're happier -- and saner -- in the summer months]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a>Spring has sprung, at least for most of us, which means sundresses, seersucker and boozy croquet parties on the front lawn. Goodbye happy lamp, hello mimosa.</p><p>But it’s not just champagne that’s lifting our spirits and banishing the wintertime blues. According to Google (and a team of researchers from the University of Southern California, Harvard and Johns Hopkins) mental illnesses — such as obsessive compulsive disorder, depression and anorexia — are far more seasonal than we think.</p><p>The epidemiologists, led by John Ayers, combed through every Google search performed in the United States and Australia between 2006 and 2010, looking for queries like “symptoms of” and “medications for” OCD, anxiety, ADHD, bipolar, depression, anorexia, bulimia and schizophrenia.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/21/study_depression_and_anxiety_may_be_more_seasonal_than_we_think_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/21/study_depression_and_anxiety_may_be_more_seasonal_than_we_think_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Men may not understand women after all</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/20/do_men_really_have_trouble_understanding_women_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/20/do_men_really_have_trouble_understanding_women_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2013 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13276591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new study reveals that men have trouble reading female facial expressions]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /> Ladies: Do you often feel misunderstood by men? Do they fail to pick up on fairly obvious nonverbal signals, such as expressions of fear or disgust? <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0060278" target="_blank">Newly published research</a> suggests your perception is entirely valid — but it’s not his fault.</p><p>A study from Germany finds that men do a much better job of interpreting one vital set of signals — the emotions conveyed by the eyes — when they’re communicating with another man, compared to another woman.</p><p>“The finding that men are superior in recognizing emotions/mental states of other men, as compared to women, might be surprising,” a research team led by psychiatrist <a href="http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Boris_Schiffer/" target="_blank">Boris Schiffer</a> reports in the journal PLOS ONE. They add, however, that it makes considerable sense in evolutionary terms.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/20/do_men_really_have_trouble_understanding_women_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/20/do_men_really_have_trouble_understanding_women_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How safe can a marathon be?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/how_safe_can_a_marathon_be_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/how_safe_can_a_marathon_be_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 18:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Marathon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Bombings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marathon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13272852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There have been eight at-marathon attacks since 1994 -- and all of them were likely unavoidable]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> The marathon-as-spectacle is, more than any other sporting event, built on the responsibility and rationality and general non-wickedness of other human beings. You’re at this long, winding, sweeping thing—<em>event </em>really is the best way to put it. It’s a stadium 26.2 miles long. And you’re allowed to be up close to the competitors—cheering them on, handing them water, <a href="http://www.boston.com/sports/blogs/shesgamesports/2013/03/where-are-they-now-rosie-ruiz-and-the-man-who-uncovered-her-ruse.html" target="_blank">sneaking onto the course and claiming you’ve won</a>—at any point.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/how_safe_can_a_marathon_be_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/how_safe_can_a_marathon_be_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s a bird, it&#8217;s a plane, it&#8217;s a gay comic book superhero</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/its_a_bird_its_a_plane_its_a_gay_comic_book_superhero_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/its_a_bird_its_a_plane_its_a_gay_comic_book_superhero_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2013 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comic Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[superheroes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13269116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following reports of Apple blocking a gay-themed issue, we take a look at the history of same-sex love in comics]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple made more than a few new enemies yesterday — and this time the tech giant wasn’t the one that did something wrong.<br /> <a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a></p><p>On Tuesday, April 9, Brian K. Vaughan, creator of the popular comic book "Saga," released <a href="http://mattfraction.com/post/47563225751/from-brian-k-vaughan-re-saga-12-and-apple" target="_blank">a statement on Tumblr</a> claiming that the newest issue of his series was blocked from the App Store because of some potentially offensive imagery. “Fiona and I could always edit the images in question,” Vaughan wrote, referring to Fiona Staples, his co-creator, herself a popular comic book artist since the mid-2000s, “but everything we put into the book is there to advance our story, not (just) to shock or titillate, so we’re not changing shit.”</p><p>The images in question? Two postage-stamp-sized images of explicit (but not, by any means, erotic) gay sex.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/its_a_bird_its_a_plane_its_a_gay_comic_book_superhero_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/its_a_bird_its_a_plane_its_a_gay_comic_book_superhero_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: We&#8217;ll lose weight for dough</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/study_well_lose_weight_for_dough_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/study_well_lose_weight_for_dough_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weight Loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philadelphia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13267150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research suggests that cash incentives may be the best way to lose pounds -- and slow companies' health costs]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> Trying to hit the gym and shed that winter insulation? With bikini season just around the corner, weight loss seems to be—once again—the water-cooler topic <em>du jour</em>. And for employers and health insurers both, that’s good news.</p><p>Encouraging workers to get a little competitive on the elliptical by offering them cash incentives may be the best way to help them lose pounds—and to slow companies’ spiraling health care costs.</p><p>That’s what researchers from Michigan and Pennsylvania discovered when they implemented a dollars-for-dieters program among the medical staff at Philadelphia’s Children’s Hospital.</p><p>Each participant was given a monthly weight-loss goal, based on his or her body-mass index, and assigned to one of two cohorts.</p><p>Members of the “individual incentive” cohort were eligible to win 100 dollars for every month that they hit their goal; if they fell short, the hospital simply kept the money.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/study_well_lose_weight_for_dough_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/study_well_lose_weight_for_dough_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Down with the plastic lunch tray!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/down_with_the_plastic_lunch_tray_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/down_with_the_plastic_lunch_tray_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 18:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Old Chapel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13266038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Industry reports suggest that ditching the cafeteria mainstay may be one of the best ways to reduce food waste]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> When I was a sophomore in college, a near mutiny arose on campus after the administration announced that, forthwith, all plastic trays would be removed from our cafeterias. Not only did the trays encourage students to waste food, <a href="http://www.middlebury.edu/#story251598" target="_blank">Old Chapel</a> argued, but washing them all—in addition to the usual slew of plates, bowls, and flatware—consumed a needless amount of chemical detergent, hot water, and worker wages. (They also had a pesky habit of winding up on the sledding hill in winter.) This being rural Vermont, and with so little else to organize against—the Dow was above 14,000, Occupy Wall Street was a distant dream—we took our teenage entitlement and self-righteous anger out on poor Matthew Biette, the bow-tied director of college dining.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/down_with_the_plastic_lunch_tray_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/down_with_the_plastic_lunch_tray_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: &#8220;Working together&#8221; won&#8217;t fix climate change</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/study_working_together_wont_fix_climate_change_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/study_working_together_wont_fix_climate_change_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stanford university]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13262789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Researchers say the best way to encourage activism is by emphasizing individual, rather than collective, action]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to climate change, we’re all in this dilemma together, and forcefully addressing it will require collaboration and cooperation. A stirring sentiment, but if you’re looking to spur white Americans to action, <a href="http://pss.sagepub.com/content/24/2/189.abstract" target="_blank">it’s actually counterproductive</a>.<br /> <a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a></p><p>That’s the conclusion of a Stanford University research team, which found invoking the idea of interdependence undermined the motivation of European-American students to take a course in environmental sustainability.</p><p>The researchers, led by <a href="https://ccsre.stanford.edu/people-profiles/maryam-hamedani" target="_blank">MarYam Hamedani</a> of Stanford’s Center for Comparative Studies in Race and Ethnicity, argue that in mainstream European-American culture, independence functions as a “foundational schema” — that is, an underlying design or blueprint that guides behavior.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/study_working_together_wont_fix_climate_change_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/study_working_together_wont_fix_climate_change_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is my cellphone giving me hemorrhoids?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/is_my_cell_phone_giving_me_hemorrhoids_and_other_ridiculous_questions_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/is_my_cell_phone_giving_me_hemorrhoids_and_other_ridiculous_questions_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 16:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anniversaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13261559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To celebrate the mobile phone's 40th anniversary, we look back on the media's past concerns over its dangers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cellphones can be wonderful things. You might even be reading this <em>on</em> a cellphone. And <a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/technology/2013/04/first-cell-phone/63832/" target="_blank">today is the 40th birthday of the first mobile phone</a>. That phone—<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/17/magazine/who-made-that-cellphone.html?_r=1&amp;" target="_blank">look at how cute the antenna is!</a>—could call other people at a somewhat successful clip and not fit in your pocket, but that’s about it.<br /> <a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a></p><p>Over the last 40 years cellphones have developed the ability to do so many different non-phone-call things, making calling more of “feature” or, oh no, an “app,” rather than a vital method of communication upon which this device’s existence is based.</p><p>So, 40 years on, it’s time to take stock of and ask yourself—as others have already done—what Your Cellphone can actually do.</p><p>Is your cellphone…</p><p><a href="http://www.wnd.com/2012/12/is-your-beloved-cell-phone-killing-you/">Killing you</a>?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/is_my_cell_phone_giving_me_hemorrhoids_and_other_ridiculous_questions_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/is_my_cell_phone_giving_me_hemorrhoids_and_other_ridiculous_questions_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>There are no lone inventors</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/nikola_tesla_and_the_myth_of_the_lone_inventor_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/nikola_tesla_and_the_myth_of_the_lone_inventor_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inventions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engineering]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13260201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nikola Tesla's work on AC technology changed the world, but to pretend he was its sole developer is ludicrous]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a></p><p><em>This post is based on a talk I gave at South by Southwest and a version of it first appeared at <a href="http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20130322-tesla-and-the-lone-inventor-myth">BBC Future</a>.</em></p><p>Who invented the Internet?</p><p>To answer that seemingly simple question you basically have two options: you can go on for hours explaining the hundreds of people and institutions that contributed crucial advancements to the way that the Internet operates, or you can just say Vint Cerf. Or Leonard Kleinrock. Or Tim Berners-Lee.</p><p>People have been fighting for decades over who invented the net. Some will tell you that Vint Cerf’s work on its underlying protocols—TCP/IP—was its true beginning. Others will go back further in history and tell you that Leonard Kleinrock’s work on queuing theory was the real birth. Some may scoff at the idea of conflating the web and the Internet by suggesting Tim Berners-Lee, but in multiple-choice tests of the future the “right” answer will be determined by the next hundred years of how historians choose to tell that story.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/nikola_tesla_and_the_myth_of_the_lone_inventor_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/nikola_tesla_and_the_myth_of_the_lone_inventor_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High school dorks need not despair</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/high_school_dorks_need_not_despair_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/high_school_dorks_need_not_despair_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 19:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journal of Research on Adolescence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hooking Up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13258058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Research reveals that students who aren't romantically active often possess superior study skills to those who are]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a>  As someone who didn’t have, ahem, a wealth of opportunity to explore the high school dating scene, my interactions with female classmates came primarily in the form of AOL instant messages and orchestra bus trips. By senior year, I’d received the “let’s just be friends” talk so often that I knew it by heart.</p><p>Was it any coincidence that I didn’t touch a drop of alcohol till my freshman year of college, and underlined my English texts with colored pencils and a ruler? According to a six-year longitudinal study that looks at teenagers’ dating patterns, partying habits, and study skills, the simple answer is: no.</p><p><a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jora.12029/abstract">The study, published online</a> last week by the <em>Journal of Research on Adolescence</em>, followed 620 students—half male, half female—from sixth grade through their senior year of high school. Once a year, researchers from the University of Georgia’s School of Public Health interviewed the students, asking them about their romantic lives, as well as their drug and alcohol use. From teachers, researchers collected academic evaluations — how organized and hard-working was the student? How often did they turn in their homework and complete the assigned reading?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/high_school_dorks_need_not_despair_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/high_school_dorks_need_not_despair_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Facebook is being used to spread racism</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/31/a_new_study_facebook_is_being_used_to_spread_recism_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/31/a_new_study_facebook_is_being_used_to_spread_recism_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Mar 2013 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shannon Rauch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kimberley Schanz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13255744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Frequent users are likely susceptible to negative messages ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Facebook a particularly powerful medium to spread racist messages? That’s the disturbing implication of a <a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563212003160" target="_blank">newly published study</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a><br /> “Frequent users are particularly disposed to be influenced by negative racial messages,” psychologists <a href="http://www.providence.edu/psychology/Pages/social-lab.aspx" target="_blank">Shannon Rauch</a> and <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/pub/kimberley-schanz/31/60b/357" target="_blank">Kimberley Schanz</a> write in the journal Computers in Human Behavior.</p><p>They argue these heavy users log onto the site in search of social inclusion rather than information — and as such, they’re prone to express agreement with the material they see without thinking about it too deeply. This combination of “a need to connect and an ethos of shallow processing” creates an atmosphere conducive to the spread of racist thoughts.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/31/a_new_study_facebook_is_being_used_to_spread_recism_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/31/a_new_study_facebook_is_being_used_to_spread_recism_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canada&#8217;s healthcare system is dysfunctional, too</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/canadas_health_care_system_is_dysfunctional_too_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/canadas_health_care_system_is_dysfunctional_too_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 17:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Medical Association Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Toronto]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13252361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research reveals that its healthcare providers tend to discriminate against the homeless]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Single-payer healthcare solves a lot of problems—dizzying insurance premiums, preexisting condition jeopardy—just not all of them.</p><p>Prejudice, like diabetes, is a condition for which no drug yet exists, and as <a href="http://www.cmaj.ca/content/early/2013/02/25/cmaj.121383" target="_blank">a new bit of research in the Canadian Medical Association Journal</a> demonstrates, even physicians working in a universal care system aren’t immune to its effects.</p><p><a href="http://www.stmichaelshospital.com/research/profile.php?id=hwang" target="_blank">Stephen Hwang</a>, an internist at the University of Toronto, wanted to know just how endemic socioeconomic discrimination was in local clinics. “I provide care for a number of people who are homeless and marginalized in society,” he says, “and they not infrequently mention to me that they feel that, in the past, they’ve been treated differently by certain health care providers. They feel that it was simply because they were poor or homeless.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/canadas_health_care_system_is_dysfunctional_too_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/canadas_health_care_system_is_dysfunctional_too_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does studying science make you a better person?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/23/does_studying_science_make_you_a_better_person_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/23/does_studying_science_make_you_a_better_person_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13249332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new study suggests that scientists are more likely to have a strong moral compass than those outside the field]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Want to be a better person? Spend more time thinking about science.<br /> <a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a></p><p>That’s the implication of <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0057989" target="_blank">newly published research</a>, which finds people who study science — or who are even momentarily exposed to the idea of scientific research — are more likely to condemn unethical behavior and more inclined to help others.</p><p>“Thinking about science leads individuals to endorse more stringent moral norms,” report psychologists <a href="http://christinemakellams.com/cv/" target="_blank">Christine Ma-Kellams</a> of Harvard University and <a href="http://www.psych.ucsb.edu/people/faculty/blascovich/" target="_blank">Jim Blascovich</a> of the University of California, Santa Barbara. Their research is published in the online journal PLOS One.</p><p>The researchers describe four experiments, all conducted at UCSB, that back up their surprising conclusion.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/23/does_studying_science_make_you_a_better_person_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/23/does_studying_science_make_you_a_better_person_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Literature isn&#8217;t as &#8220;moody&#8221; as it used to be</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/literature_isnt_as_moody_as_it_used_to_be_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/literature_isnt_as_moody_as_it_used_to_be_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 21:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Bristol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLOS One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alberto Acerbi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13248441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new study reveals that contemporary English-language books use less emotionally charged words than ever before]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> There’s a widespread perception that we’ve gotten more touchy-feely over the past couple of generations—increasingly willing to express our emotions.</p><p>If so, it’s not reflected in our writing.</p><p>A <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0059030" target="_blank">new study</a> finds that, in a large dataset of English-language books, the use of terms expressing six basic emotions steadily decreased over the course of the 20th century. “We believe the changes (in word usage) do reflect changes in culture,” writes the research team, led by anthropologist <a href="http://acerbialberto.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">Alberto Acerbi</a> of the University of Bristol.</p><p>Writing in the online journal <a href="http://www.plosone.org/home.action" target="_blank"><em>PLOS One</em></a>, they note that their findings mirror social conditions, with terms reflecting happy moods peaking in the 1920s and 1960s, and those suggesting sad moods reaching their apex in the war years of the 1940s.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/literature_isnt_as_moody_as_it_used_to_be_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/literature_isnt_as_moody_as_it_used_to_be_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America has stopped worrying, loves the bomb</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/america_has_stopped_worrying_loves_the_bomb_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/america_has_stopped_worrying_loves_the_bomb_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 18:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Warfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr. Strangelove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinatown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nagasaki]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13245944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new study reveals that more Americans support the use of nuclear warfare than originally thought]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> Nuclear war is unthinkable. At least, that’s <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/13/books/review/five-myths-about-nuclear-weapons-and-more.html" target="_blank">what we like to tell ourselves</a>. Given the mass death and devastation from an atomic strike, surely only a desperate despot would even consider such a strike.</p><div id="attachment_54073"> <p>Slim Pickens joyfully rides a nuclear bomb onto a Russian target in the classic satire, “Dr. Strangelove.”</p> </div><p>Well, think again. A new study finds that, among the American public, the taboo against the use of nukes is far weaker than you might imagine.</p><p>“When people are faced with scenarios they consider high-stakes, they end up supporting—or even preferring—actions that initially seem hard to imagine,” said <a href="http://www.dartmouth.edu/~dpress/about.htm" target="_blank">Daryl Press</a>, an associate professor at the Dartmouth College Department of Government.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/america_has_stopped_worrying_loves_the_bomb_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/america_has_stopped_worrying_loves_the_bomb_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Doulas can coach low-income women on childbirth</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/17/how_about_labor_coaches_for_low_income_childbirths_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/17/how_about_labor_coaches_for_low_income_childbirths_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Mar 2013 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Childbirth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicaid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Low-income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doulas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hospital care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13242468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Medicaid could save millions and reduce the risks of complicated births by providing doulas for struggling women]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a></p><p>Here’s a quick medical quiz: What’s the most common reason for hospitalization in the United States? Take a stab. Respiratory distress? Cardiac arrest?</p><p>Try childbirth. As researchers at the <a href="http://www.sph.umn.edu/" target="_blank">University of Minnesota’s School of Public Health</a> observe, more than four million babies are born in American hospitals every year, and from maternal checkups to newborn care, moms-to-be rack up more charges than any other patients. In 2009, those costs totaled nearly $30 billion.</p><p>Maternal health care is a big burden on Medicaid, which pays the expenses of low-income patients and annually foots the bill for 45 percent of all births. What’s more, low-income moms have disproportionately high rates of complication and Caesarean section. According to the Minnesota researchers, Medicaid mothers are more likely to give birth prematurely, or to low-weight babies, than more affluent women.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/17/how_about_labor_coaches_for_low_income_childbirths_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/17/how_about_labor_coaches_for_low_income_childbirths_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>