<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Pacific Standard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/pacific_standard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 10:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Progressives don&#8217;t hold a monopoly on science</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/progressives_dont_hold_a_monopoly_on_science/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/progressives_dont_hold_a_monopoly_on_science/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 23:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Mooney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Left Behind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Republican Brain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The conservative co-author of a book on partisan science answers his critic from Pacific Standard]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> Any book that touches upon politics almost automatically angers half of the American public, regardless of what is written inside of it. It takes a special person—an objective, open-minded and self-critical one—to read and learn from a science book that criticizes people with whom the reader likes and agrees with politically.</p><p>Recently, <em>Pacific Standard</em> published a review (<a href="http://www.psmag.com/magazines/january-february-2013/republican-brain-science-left-behind-chris-mooney-alex-berezow-hank-campbell-50439/">“Red Science, Blue Science,”</a>January/February 2013) by Wray Herbert, a pop psychology writer,of political writer Chris Mooney’s book <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/The-Republican-Brain-Science-Science-/dp/1118094514/">The Republican Brain</a></em> and my new book, <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Science-Left-Behind-Feel-Good-Anti-Scientific/dp/1610391640/">Science Left Behind</a></em>, which I co-authored with Hank Campbell.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/progressives_dont_hold_a_monopoly_on_science/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/progressives_dont_hold_a_monopoly_on_science/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can evolution explain high heels?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/can_evolution_explain_high_heeled_shoes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/can_evolution_explain_high_heeled_shoes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Heels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Femininity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research offers an unexpected explanation for their allure -- one that has nothing to do with increased height]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> Fashions in dress come and go, but a peculiar one has stayed in style for many generations, and shows no sign of fading away. It’s the <a href="http://www.randomhistory.com/1-50/036heels.html" target="_blank">high-heeled shoe</a>, which first became a fashion statement in 16th-century France, and has been a part of the modern woman’s wardrobe since the mid-19thcentury.</p><p>Ask a woman why she endures the awkwardness and discomfort, and she’ll probably respond, “They make me look, and feel, more attractive.” <a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001225" target="_blank">Newly published research</a> suggests this perception is accurate, but perhaps not for the reason you’d expect.</p><p>It’s not the artificially increased height that turns heads. Rather, it’s how such footwear changes the mechanics of a woman’s gait.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/can_evolution_explain_high_heeled_shoes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/can_evolution_explain_high_heeled_shoes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>86</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is sugar the next tobacco?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/is_sugar_the_next_tobacco/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/is_sugar_the_next_tobacco/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Lustig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sugar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fat Chance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13157515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It will be if author Robert Lustig, the man behind the YouTube sensation "Sugar: The Bitter Truth," has his way]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> Among the least likely viral megahits on YouTube is <a href="http://youtu.be/dBnniua6-oM" target="_blank">a 90-minute lecture</a> by the food scold and pediatric endocrinologist Robert Lustig, entitled “Sugar: The Bitter Truth.” He delivers it in a windowless room at the Osher Center for Integrative Medicine at the University of California, San Francisco. The talk is simultaneously boring and powerful, combining the gravitas of a national health crisis, the thrill of conspiracy theory, and the tedium of PowerPoint slides. Midway through the talk he scans the hall for approval. “Am I debunking?”</p><p>The UCSF extension students mutter “yeah”—most of them, at least. Lustig has a way of seeking validation and pissing off people at the same time. His combined love of showmanship and need for approval led to acting in 12 musical-theater performances during his three years as an undergraduate at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. His greatest role yet may be as the loudest, most contrarian voice in the public-health debate over why we get fat and what we should do about it.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/is_sugar_the_next_tobacco/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/is_sugar_the_next_tobacco/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Polar bears just might outlive us all</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/polar_bears_just_might_outlive_us_all/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/polar_bears_just_might_outlive_us_all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polar bears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antarctica]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13157403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They've become the fuzzy face of climate change. But these animals are far more resilient than we like to think]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> <strong>On January 24, 2004, </strong>in the frigid moonscape of an Arctic winter, wildlife biologist Steven Amstrup rode in a helicopter flying low over the ice. Using an infrared heat detector, he hoped to find polar bears in their dens. When the gun recorded a hit, Amstrup circled around for a closer look. What confronted him was something he had never seen in 34 years of research. The mouth of the den was open, and a smear of bright-red blood stretched away for more than 200 feet. At the end of a long drag trail in the ice lay the still-warm body of a female polar bear. The air temperature was 20 degrees below zero; this bear could not have been dead for more than 12 hours.</p><p>Polar bears do not have enemies. A male can weigh 1,500 pounds, with paws a foot wide and savage teeth. They are the unchallenged master predators in the harshest environment on Earth. A full-grown bear slaughtered in her den is far outside the ordinary.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/polar_bears_just_might_outlive_us_all/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/polar_bears_just_might_outlive_us_all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are we born with a sense of fairness?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/are_we_born_with_a_sense_of_fairness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/are_we_born_with_a_sense_of_fairness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 16:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Babies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13154830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Evolutionary biologists are investigating whether it's a primal instinct dating back to hunter-gatherer societies]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> Evolutionary biologist Gordon Orians and I are working on a project to investigate the origins and evolution of the human sense of fairness, and the role it plays in modern social, economic, and political institutions. I recently gave a talk on the subject.</p><p>To begin the talk, I asked the audience members to recollect their first encounter with the concept of fairness. I had formed a fledgling hypothesis, and wanted to put it to the test.</p><p>As people raised their hands, I called on them to share their memories. A pattern quickly emerged:</p><ul> <li>“I had to take the rap for something my sister actually did!”</li> <li>“My parents gave my brother a puppy, and <em>I’m</em> the one who loved dogs. He didn’t even like them.”</li> <li>“I came from a family with nine siblings, and we had to fight each other for food.”</li> <li>“I was an only child, and I really wanted a brother – all my friends had brothers.”</li> <li>“I was foreign, and different, and all the other kids singled me out to pick on.”</li> </ul><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/are_we_born_with_a_sense_of_fairness/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/are_we_born_with_a_sense_of_fairness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Solo rock stars die young</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/study_solo_rock_stars_die_young/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/study_solo_rock_stars_die_young/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Winehouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rock and Roll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimi Hendrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pop]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13151665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research suggests that being part of a group can help protect musicians from self-destructive behavior]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> Do you dream of being a rock star? Do you hope to live a long life?</p><p>If so, you’d better start prioritizing—or, at the very least, join a band. Because from Elvis Presley to Amy Winehouse, solo pop superstars are disproportionately likely to die young (<a href="http://www.bmj.com/press-releases/2011/12/20/27-really-dangerous-age-famous-musicians-retrospective-cohort-study" target="_blank">although not necessarily at age 27</a>).</p><p>That’s one finding of a study just published in the British journal <em>BMJ Open,</em>which takes a close look at mortality among rock and pop icons of the past half-century. And just like the rest of us, it finds, famous musicians are more likely to die from substance abuse if they had troubled childhoods.</p><p>A team of researchers led by <a href="http://www.who.int/violenceprevention/about/participants/cph/en/" target="_blank">Mark Bellis</a>, director of the <a href="http://www.cph.org.uk/" target="_blank">Centre for Public Health</a> at Liverpool John Moores University, looked at the mortality rates and childhood experiences of 1,489 rock and pop stars who gained fame between 1956 and 2006. Comparisons were made across the decades, and between European and American musicians.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/study_solo_rock_stars_die_young/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/study_solo_rock_stars_die_young/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mass shootings are actually bad for gun control advocates</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/mass_shootings_are_actually_bad_for_gun_control_advocates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/mass_shootings_are_actually_bad_for_gun_control_advocates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 18:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Columbine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aurora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook Elementary Shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Violence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13147588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The horrifying truth is that massacres are difficult to prevent. More common gun crimes are another story entirely]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> The tragic <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/15/nyregion/shooting-reported-at-connecticut-elementary-school.html?hp" target="_blank">mass killings</a> at that Connecticut school will undoubtedly spur renewed calls for gun control. According to one criminologist, that would be a welcome but somewhat ironic development, since mass school shootings seldom provide compelling evidence in favor of more restrictions on weapons.</p><p>The scholarly journal <em>American Behavioral Scientist</em> devoted two issues in 2009 to the 10<sup>th</sup> anniversary of the <a href="http://history1900s.about.com/od/famouscrimesscandals/a/columbine.htm" target="_blank">Columbine High School mass killings</a> and what, if anything, we have learned from them. <a href="http://www.criminology.fsu.edu/p/faculty-gary-kleck.php" target="_blank">Gary Kleck</a>, professor of criminology and criminal justice at Florida State University, contributed <a href="http://abs.sagepub.com/content/52/10/1447.abstract" target="_blank">an essay</a> in which he called mass school shootings “the worst possible case for gun control.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/mass_shootings_are_actually_bad_for_gun_control_advocates/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/mass_shootings_are_actually_bad_for_gun_control_advocates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will concussions kill football?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/15/will_concussions_kill_football/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/15/will_concussions_kill_football/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2012 14:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Concussions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13125711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New studies reveal the danger of on-field hits, leaving NFL executives scrambling for ways to repair their brand]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> Each year about four million young athletes play football. It’s estimated that between 11 and 15 percent of those children get a concussion or mild traumatic brain injury (TBI). According to a 2011 <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2011/p1006_TBI_Youth.html">study</a> by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, there has been a 60 percent increase in all youth athletes treated for TBI in the past decade.</p><p>To combat growing unease among parents and observers, USA Football, the official football development partner of the NFL, created Heads Up Football, a program designed to help reduce head injuries in high-school football. The program has a <a href="http://usafootball.com/#headsup">nice website</a>, videos, and a national advertising campaign. But the main component is making sure children are taught proper tackling technique.</p><p>The “better and safer tackle,” according to a USA Football <a href="http://videos.usafootball.com/video/The-Tackle-The-Heads-Up-Footbal">video tutorial</a>, is when an athlete begins from the proper stance, explodes from the hips, and leads with the chest—all with the intent of keeping the head up and out of the tackle.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/15/will_concussions_kill_football/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/15/will_concussions_kill_football/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Liberals stereotype more</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/study_liberals_stereotype_more_than_conservatives/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/study_liberals_stereotype_more_than_conservatives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 21:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Left]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Right]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13124156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research suggests that when it comes to moral values, the left is more prone than the right]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> Those conservatives are appalling: They couldn’t care less if people get hurt. And liberals? They think anything goes, and have no concept of the meaning of loyalty.</p><p>Caricatures? Absolutely. But such stereotypes are widely held among Americans, <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0050092" target="_blank">newly published research</a> confirms, with liberals particularly clueless about the concerns of conservatives.</p><p>Regarding issues of morality, “people overestimate how dramatically liberals and conservatives differ,” psychologists <a href="http://dornsife.usc.edu/cf/faculty-and-staff/faculty.cfm?pid=1032745" target="_blank">Jesse Graham</a>, Brian Nosek and <a href="http://www.psmag.com/politics/explaining-liberals-to-conservatives-and-vice-versa-39896/" target="_blank">Jonathan Haidt</a> write in the online journal <em>PLoS One</em>. Specifically, their research suggests those on the left unfairly assume their counterparts on the right are cold-hearted on issues involving harm and fairness.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/study_liberals_stereotype_more_than_conservatives/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/study_liberals_stereotype_more_than_conservatives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who&#8217;s most susceptible to PTSD?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/whos_most_susceptible_to_ptsd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/whos_most_susceptible_to_ptsd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 17:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PTSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denmark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13120395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A staggering number of returning soldiers are affected with the disorder, yet we still don't entirely understand it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> Franklin D. Roosevelt, the president who led the United States into the depths of total war and back out again, has a little-visited memorial on the far side of the Tidal Basin in Washington, D.C. It’s private and reflective, like the man himself, and chiseled into the rough stone are these words, from a <a href="http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=15097">Chautauqua speech</a> made three years before the German invasion of Poland: “I have seen war. I have seen war on land and sea. I have seen blood running from the wounded… I have seen the dead in the mud. I have seen cities destroyed… I have seen children starving. I have seen the agony of mothers and wives. I hate war.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/whos_most_susceptible_to_ptsd/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/whos_most_susceptible_to_ptsd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You&#8217;re being tricked into buying that awful sweater!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/christmas_commerce_has_its_own_sickly_sweet_smell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/christmas_commerce_has_its_own_sickly_sweet_smell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Friday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shopping Malls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Switzerland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13119101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research shows that simple scents like cookies and oranges can get consumers in the shopping spirit]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> While you’re out doing your holiday shopping this month, you might notice a certain scent in the air. No, it’s not the Spirit of Christmas (or not <em>just</em> that, anyway). It’s the smell of pine. Or orange. Or fresh-baked cookies.</p><p>There’s a reason for that.</p><p>Savvy retailers use all kinds of sensory information to convey their brand, welcome you in, and put you in a frame of mind that they hope will lead to more sales. Their displays are arranged just so. Their wall colors are carefully chosen. The music burbling through their speakers hits all the right notes.</p><p>That fresh-baked-cookie smell is part of the package. The use of scents to lure customers in is the latest frontier in sensory marketing, with an entire industry supplying retailers with just the right aroma for their business.</p><p>The problem is, the science isn’t always there.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/christmas_commerce_has_its_own_sickly_sweet_smell/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/christmas_commerce_has_its_own_sickly_sweet_smell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are you the next Mark Zuckerberg?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/are_you_the_next_mark_zuckerberg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/are_you_the_next_mark_zuckerberg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 17:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indonesia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entrepreneur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harvard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13117077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New tests are helping loan officers assess entrepreneurs -- and weed out the bad investment risks from the good]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> Bankers around the world know there are profits to be reaped by making loans to promising small businesses that fall just short of traditional definitions of “creditworthy.” Ever since Nobel Prize winner Muhammad Yunus’ <a href="http://www.grameenfoundation.org/" target="_blank">Grameen Bank</a> pioneered “microfinance” by making tiny loans to single mothers in Bangladesh, development policymakers also have believed that getting credit to small businesses—those too large for Grameen-style microloans but still lacking collateral or credit history—is not only possible, but the key to helping a nation’s economic growth. So how to figure out who’s a good risk for a loan—and who isn’t?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/are_you_the_next_mark_zuckerberg/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/are_you_the_next_mark_zuckerberg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: &#8220;Slut-shaming&#8221; won&#8217;t go away</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/study_slut_shaming_wont_go_away/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/study_slut_shaming_wont_go_away/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 19:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birth Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13114548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research reveals that 50 years after the introduction of the pill, sexual double standards are alive and well]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> For women, engaging in casual sex still carries a stigma, and the prospect of being judged dampens their interest in one-night stands.</p><p>That’s the key finding of a <a href="http://pwq.sagepub.com/content/early/2012/11/26/0361684312467169.abstract" target="_blank">newly published study</a> that suggests sexual mores remain stubbornly stable. It concludes that, more than a half-century after the <a href="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/pill/timeline/timeline2.html" target="_blank">introduction of the birth control pill</a>, the sexual double standard is alive and well and still influencing women’s everyday behavior.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/study_slut_shaming_wont_go_away/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/study_slut_shaming_wont_go_away/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A plan to drive conservatives wild</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/02/a_plan_to_drive_conservatives_wild/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/02/a_plan_to_drive_conservatives_wild/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2012 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plan B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmacies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birth Control]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13112386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The American Academy of Pediatrics says docs should pre-prescribe Plan B birth control to girls under 17]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> There’s no culture war like the contraception war. And whether you’re a Catholic churchgoer, a Planned Parenthood donor, a House Republican, or a Code Pink activist, there are few better ways to spoil holidays with the in-laws than to bring up birth control at the dinner table.</p><p>It was considerate of the American Academy of Pediatrics, then, to wait until after the Thanksgiving weekend to release <a href="http://www.aap.org/en-us/about-the-aap/aap-press-room/Pages/AAP-Recommends-Emergency-Contraception-Be-Available-to-Teens.aspx">a policy brief</a> recommending that physicians pre-prescribe emergency contraception—known as Plan B or Next Choice—to teenage patients, in order to ensure their ability to obtain it when needed. Onerous federal laws discourage teens from using so-called “morning-after pills,” despite the enormous human and financial costs of an unplanned pregnancy, and according to the AAP, physicians might remedy the problem by writing high schoolers a script for Plan B long before the morning after.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/02/a_plan_to_drive_conservatives_wild/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/02/a_plan_to_drive_conservatives_wild/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>American cities are dropping like flies</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/american_cities_are_dropping_like_flies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/american_cities_are_dropping_like_flies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stockton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposition 13]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jerry brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13109183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stockton, California is just the latest to file for bankruptcy. Why can't local governments catch a break?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> Cities are dropping like flies. In the last several months, a string of municipal governments in states from Alabama to Rhode Island have filed for bankruptcy. Even more are <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505263_162-57461537/economists-say-stockton-calif-wont-be-last-u.s-city-to-go-bankrupt/" target="_blank">likely to follow</a> within the next year as cities reel from an end to federal stimulus dollars.</p><p>What’s going on with local governments? Their troubles stem from multiple sources, but the critical factor is, yes, after all this time, still the housing bust. City finances are almost exclusively tied to property tax revenue—indeed, most locales have no other funding source. Despite all the focus on mismanagement and bloated pensions, few cities would be in these severe dire straits had housing prices not fallen by roughly 41 percent or even greater, in some places.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/american_cities_are_dropping_like_flies/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/american_cities_are_dropping_like_flies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Facebook promote safe sex?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/24/can_facebook_promote_safe_sex/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/24/can_facebook_promote_safe_sex/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2012 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teenagers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safe sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adolescents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13105396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research shows mixed results when high-risk teenagers are targeted with online public health initiatives ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> What exactly is Facebook good for, anyway? Investigating the college antics of the office intern, perhaps, or vetting your teenage daughter’s new boyfriend; sharing Instagrams of your toddler with the in-laws, or reminding exes how happy you are with your new man who, <em>ahem</em>, just surprised you with a trip to Turks and Caicos.</p><p>Public policy leaders have somewhat higher hopes, of course. They’d like to use Facebook to <a href="http://www.psmag.com/health/facebook-saving-lives-one-kidney-at-a-time-42266/">encourage organ donation</a>, <a href="https://www.facebook.com/DisasterRelief">charity in the wake of disaster</a>, even <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/09/facebook-knows-how-to-trick-you-into-voting/262363/">voter participation</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.ucdenver.edu/academics/colleges/PublicHealth/departments/CommunityBehavioralHealth/About/Faculty/Pages/BullS.aspx">Sheana Bull</a> would like to use it to promote safer sex.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/24/can_facebook_promote_safe_sex/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/24/can_facebook_promote_safe_sex/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Music gets you high</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/23/music_gets_you_high/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/23/music_gets_you_high/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Endorphins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13105421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research on endorphins finds people have higher pain thresholds immediately after singing, dancing and drumming]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> Jealous of the “runner’s high” serious athletes feel after an intense, vigorous workout? Well, newly published research reveals three alternative ways you can release those mood-enhancing endorphins:</p><p>Singing, dancing, and drumming.</p><p>That’s the conclusion of a <a href="http://www.epjournal.net/articles/performance-of-music-elevates-pain-threshold-and-positive-affect-implications-for-the-evolutionary-function-of-music/" target="_blank">study</a> by University of Oxford psychologist <a href="http://www.neuroscience.ox.ac.uk/directory/robin-i-m-dunbar/" target="_blank">Robin Dunbar</a>. He and his colleagues report people who have just been playing music have a higher tolerance for pain—an indication their bodies are producing <a href="http://www.vitaminstuff.com/articles/healthfitness/articles-healthfitness-1.html" target="_blank">endorphins</a>, which are sometimes referred to as natural opiates.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/23/music_gets_you_high/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/23/music_gets_you_high/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the metrosexual finally dead?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/is_the_metrosexual_finally_dead/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/is_the_metrosexual_finally_dead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 20:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metrosexual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Simpson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13105202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a manner of speaking. After a solid run in the aughts, the descriptor has finally become passé]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> There was a death announced last week, and whether it was untimely or not, or even genuine, can remain a topic for the cyber garrulous.</p><p>The passing was of the metrosexual.</p><p>The word is that British journalist <a href="http://www.marksimpson.com/here-come-the-mirror-men/" target="_blank">Mark Simpson coined “metrosexual” in 1994</a>, that being the word because Mark “The ‘Daddy’ of the Metrosexual, the Retrosexual &amp; Spawner of Sporno” Simpson tells us so. For a definition, I offer excerpts from the <a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=metrosexual">Urban Dictionary</a>, with charming stylistic peculiarities intact:</p><blockquote><p>A new name for something quite old. Men with taste &amp; style who know about fashion, art, and culture have always existed. In past centuries, these kinds of men were in the uppercrust of society (more leisure time). … An American Metrosexual is like your average European male. In France or Italy, men can be manly and work on cars and know about art and fashion at the same time. They are cool with that and don’t need some special name for the less “masculine” side.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/is_the_metrosexual_finally_dead/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/is_the_metrosexual_finally_dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are neuroscientists the next great architects?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/are_neuroscientists_the_next_great_architects/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/are_neuroscientists_the_next_great_architects/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13068237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Academy of Neuroscience for Architecture thinks so, and it's spending thousands of dollars to find out]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> <strong>ARCHITECTS HAVE BEEN</strong> talking for years about “biophilic” design, “evidence based” design, design informed by the work of psychologists. But last May, at the profession’s annual convention, John Zeisel and fellow panelists were trying to explain neuroscience to a packed ballroom.</p><p>The late-afternoon session pushed well past the end of the day; questions just kept coming. It was a scene, Zeisel marveled—all this interest in neuroscience—that would not have taken place just a few years earlier.</p><p>Zeisel is a sociologist and architect who has researched the design of facilities for Alzheimer’s patients. Architects, he explains, “understand about aesthetics; they know about psychology. The next depth to which they can go is understanding the brain and how it works<em> </em>and<em> why</em> do people feel more comfortable in one space than another?”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/are_neuroscientists_the_next_great_architects/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/are_neuroscientists_the_next_great_architects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>James Bond for the post-Romney era</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/10/james_bond_for_the_post_romney_era/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/10/james_bond_for_the_post_romney_era/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[james bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skyfall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel Craig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sam Mendes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13068196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In "Skyfall," Sam Mendes examines the fears and anxieties of old white men in the 21st century]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> “Every generation needs another James Bond,” says <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0005222/">director Sam Mendes</a>, addressing a roomful of journalists the day before the newest 007 film, “Skyfall,” hit American theaters today. And indeed, Daniel Craig as our diminished era’s favorite secret agent is <a href="http://www.psmag.com/culture/james-bond-the-least-interesting-man-in-the-world-48666/">as close to a real human being</a> as we’ve seen: a pint-sized 40-something who bleeds easily. But the key to Bond’s enduring popularity (the brand has produced 23 movies over half a century, more than the “Star Wars” and “Batman” franchises combined) is that every Bond, from the suave Sean Connery to the campy Roger Moore, makes the case for the very existence of Men.</p><p>And by “Men,” I mean clear-eyed humans (of either sex) unburdened by emotion, who make life-or-death decisions based on logic, experience, and duty alone. (Never mind that such people don’t really exist; that’s why it’s fiction.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/10/james_bond_for_the_post_romney_era/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/10/james_bond_for_the_post_romney_era/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>