<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Paul Ryan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/paul_ryan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 17:17:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Right-wing dreams of demented utopias</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/the_right_wing_dreams_of_demented_utopias/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/the_right_wing_dreams_of_demented_utopias/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 15:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Kristol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Kristol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13156163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It used to be liberals who wanted to remake society according to a theory. Now that's the looney dream of the right]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two decades have passed since I began my gradual and reluctant break with the conservative movement, in which I had been a protégé of the late William F. Buckley Jr. and an employee of the late Irving Kristol, as executive editor of The National Interest. Since then, I have been followed by, among others, Andrew Sullivan, Fareed Zakaria, Francis Fukuyama, David Frum and <a href="http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/revenge-of-the-reality-based-community/">Bruce Bartlett</a>, all of whom, for different reasons and at different times, have become estranged from the American right. Of the British Labour politician Tony Benn, a young conservative who moved leftward over time, Harold Wilson sneered, “He immatures with age.” Others may judge whether I have immatured with age. In thinking about my career, first on the right and then (to quote FDR) “slightly left of center,” I think I have been consistent in opposing utopianism in politics, something once characteristic of part of the left and now the defining quality of the contemporary American right.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/the_right_wing_dreams_of_demented_utopias/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/the_right_wing_dreams_of_demented_utopias/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>59</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Boehner: Can anyone govern the Crazy Caucus?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/john_boehner_can_anyone_govern_the_crazy_caucus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/john_boehner_can_anyone_govern_the_crazy_caucus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13152730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[House Speaker John Boehner looked ineffectual on Plan B -- but he just might be his party's only hope]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Boehner may not last much longer as speaker of the House – but I wouldn’t count him out. Despite having an impossible situation, he’s probably done about as well as anyone could, this week’s Plan B meltdown notwithstanding. He may, as Steve Kornacki <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/the_humiliation_of_john_boehner/">suggests</a>, simply decide he’s had it and walk away. But House Republicans, whether moderate or conservative, would be foolish to encourage it.</p><p>For most of the 20th century, speaker of the House wasn’t a particularly important job – powerful committee chairs ruled, and speakers could do little about it. A long process of reform, however, removed most of the clout of those barons and strengthened party leadership, making modern speakers far more powerful than their mid-century predecessors. Since the modern speakership emerged in the 1970s, there have been three basic models of how to handle the office:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/john_boehner_can_anyone_govern_the_crazy_caucus/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/john_boehner_can_anyone_govern_the_crazy_caucus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Boehner, failure</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/john_boehner_failure/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/john_boehner_failure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 18:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RobertReich.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grover Norquist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13152206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The collapse of his "Plan B" reveals that the GOP just isn't serious about reducing the deficit]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remarkably, John Boehner couldn’t get enough House Republicans to vote in favor of his proposal to keep the Bush tax cuts in place on the first million dollars of everyone’s income and apply the old Clinton rates only to dollars over and above a million.</p><p>What? Even Grover Norquist blessed Boehner’s proposal, saying it wasn’t really a tax increase. Even Paul Ryan supported it.</p><p>What does Boehner’s failure tell us about the modern Republican Party?</p><p>That it has become a party of hypocrisy masquerading as principled ideology. The GOP talks endlessly about the importance of reducing the budget deficit. But it isn’t even willing to raise revenues from the richest three-tenths of 1 percent of Americans to help with the task. We’re talking about 400,000 people, for crying out loud.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/john_boehner_failure/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/john_boehner_failure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>George Will and Mary Matalin attack Paul Krugman on &#8220;This Week&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/george_will_and_mary_matalin_attack_paul_krugman_on_this_week/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/george_will_and_mary_matalin_attack_paul_krugman_on_this_week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 01:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Krugman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mary Matalin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[george will]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13119952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Says Will: "I have yet to encounter someone who disagrees with you who you don't think is a knave or corrupt"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The clubby tone of the Sunday show roundtable was upended on "This Week" this morning when conservatives George Will and Mary Matalin <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/week-transcript-powerhouse-roundtables/story?id=17914264&amp;page=5#.UMUy7JPjk1c">made unusually personal attacks</a> on New York Times columnist Paul Krugman.</p><p>Matalin suggested Krugman was more of a polemicist than an economist. And Will charged him with being unwilling to accept competing arguments.</p><p>Krugman asserted that Republicans have put nothing on the table to back up their talk about revenue, tax reform and entitlement cuts, calling their negotiating posture nothing but "big talk."</p><p>"So how is the president supposed to negotiate with people who say, "Here's my demands. By the way, I can't give you any specifics. Just make me happy," Krugman asked.</p><p>Matalin called Krugman "completely mendacious" and insisted that "Republicans have offered in theory and in specificity, for instance, to raise revenues, capping various deductions, not eliminating, but capping them, which the CBO says would raise $1.7 trillion over 10 years. They've been very specific."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/george_will_and_mary_matalin_attack_paul_krugman_on_this_week/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/george_will_and_mary_matalin_attack_paul_krugman_on_this_week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will the GOP ever get serious?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/will_the_gop_ever_get_serious/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/will_the_gop_ever_get_serious/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim DeMint]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13118984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Republicans' big-idea guys and policy wonks outlined their 2016 platforms this week. They sound a lot like 1980]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here we go again.</p><p>We just managed to get through a campaign in which the Republican candidate’s idea of innovation was to hold a convention themed around an out-of-context quote from his opponent. But we knew Mitt Romney was at his heart a manager, not a policy innovator. So maybe it will be better next time, with new candidates such as Bobby Jindal, Marco Rubio and Paul Ryan. Right?</p><p>Yeah, I didn’t think so.</p><p>Of course, there’s still plenty of time for innovative conservative ideas. Hey, don’t laugh. Ronald Reagan campaigned on a whole book full of policy options, and as recently as 2000, George W. Bush really did feature new ideas in his campaign.</p><p>But neither John McCain nor Mitt Romney had any interest in such things – and judging from the three proto-candidates who rolled out their “ideas” this week, it looks as if Republican politicians these days don’t even remember what actual policy ideas look like.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/will_the_gop_ever_get_serious/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/08/will_the_gop_ever_get_serious/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>64</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marco Rubio and Paul Ryan care about poor people now</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/marco_rubio_and_paul_ryan_care_about_poor_people_now/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/marco_rubio_and_paul_ryan_care_about_poor_people_now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 22:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13116359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The men who'd lead the GOP announce a rhetorical commitment to non-millionaires]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marco Rubio and Paul Ryan are "reinventing" themselves, along with the rest of their sorry party. They care about poor people now, everyone! So stop saying they don't. They're giving speeches and everything!</p><p>The Atlantic's headline is, "Are Republicans Getting Serious About Income Inequality?" As always, one is correct to silently add a "no" to the question posed in the headline. The Atlantic's David Graham is at least investigating the question rather than simply accepting the supposed Republican rebranding as important and genuine, <a href="http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=BF51F633-2353-4407-93C4-76D2147C81D4">as Politico does.</a> (The Politico piece is written by, you guessed it, Jim VandeHei and Mike Allen.)</p><p>At a dinner benefiting a foundation named for regressive taxation policy pioneer Jack Kemp, Rubio and Ryan <a href="http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2012/12/05/gop-stars-paul-ryan-marco-rubio-shine-at-kemp-award-dinner">both repeatedly paraphrased the lyrics to "We Take Care of Our Own" by Bruce Springsteen</a> in order to prove that Republicans do not explicitly support the feeding of the lumpenproletariat directly to wolves.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/marco_rubio_and_paul_ryan_care_about_poor_people_now/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/marco_rubio_and_paul_ryan_care_about_poor_people_now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Caption contest: Obama and Romney&#8217;s lunch date</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/caption_contest_obama_and_romneys_lunch_date/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/caption_contest_obama_and_romneys_lunch_date/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 20:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13110479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Romney and Obama met today and "pledged to stay in touch." But what else did they say? Tell us what you think!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>UPDATE: And the winner is...Gabriel Ortiz! Caption below:</strong></p><p><strong>"Well, I think it's important to regularly meet with the unemployed. Glad you could make it."</strong></p><p>What did Mitt Romney and Barack Obama talk about in their lunch meeting earlier today? Send your ideas to <a href="mailto:readermail@salon.com">readermail@salon.com</a>.</p><p>From the White House press release on the meeting:</p><blockquote><p>This afternoon, President Obama and Governor Romney visited for an hour over lunch in the Private Dining Room adjacent to the Oval Office.  Governor Romney congratulated the President for the success of his campaign and wished him well over the coming four years. The focus of their discussion was on America's leadership in the world and the importance of maintaining that leadership position in the future.  They pledged to stay in touch, particularly if opportunities to work together on shared interests arise in the future.  Their lunch menu included white turkey chili and Southwestern grilled chicken salad.</p></blockquote><p>Irin Carmon: "Could Romney's body language be any more awkward?"</p><p>Alex Seitz-Wald: "I love Obama's hand in the pocket. It seems a big FU to me, and an assertion of confidence, nonchalance."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/caption_contest_obama_and_romneys_lunch_date/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/caption_contest_obama_and_romneys_lunch_date/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Parks and Recreation&#8221;: Joe Biden&#8217;s sex appeal</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/parks_and_recreation_joe_bidens_sex_appeal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/parks_and_recreation_joe_bidens_sex_appeal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 18:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parks and Recreation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leslie knope]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13100607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Leslie Knope nearly makes a pass at her No. 1 crush. Will she ever overcome her awe to realize her big D.C. dreams?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Parks and Recreation” kicked off this season with a <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/21/leslie_knope_meets_john_mccain/">Washington D.C.-set episode and some political star power</a>. Sens. Olympia Snowe, Barbara Boxer and John McCain gamely appeared in the premiere, though they weren’t asked to do much. “Parks” was saving the higher degree of difficulty cameo for Vice President Joe Biden, Leslie’s longtime lust object, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/08/arts/television/joe-biden-to-appear-on-parks-and-recreation.html">who taped a top-secret scene for the show this past summer</a>. Because of regulations about candidates receiving equal airtime, “Parks” had to stay quiet about Biden’s role until after the election, lest they be forced to write a part for Paul Ryan, too. (I’m feeling a flash of regret for the Paul Ryan–Chris Traeger discussion of marathons that might have been.) The scene aired last night and Biden’s natural hamminess made him a perfect guest.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/parks_and_recreation_joe_bidens_sex_appeal/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/parks_and_recreation_joe_bidens_sex_appeal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The sore losers club</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/the_sore_losers_club_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/the_sore_losers_club_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 15:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13099010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan are already starting to channel the last guy who lost to Obama]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes, losing national candidates actually manage to enhance their reputations in defeat. The most famous example of this is probably Bob Dole, who growled his way through the 1996 campaign but then turned in a <a href="http://www2.ku.edu/~archon/cgi-bin/index.php?p=digitallibrary/digitalcontent&amp;id=1274">winning performance</a> on David Letterman’s “Late Show” a few days after the election, giving rise to something of a post-political career as a humorist. Al Gore knows something about this too; his <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GyKlcQ_HiD4">concession of the 2000 election</a> earned him respect that had eluded him throughout that campaign.</p><p>Based on their conduct since last week’s election, though, it’s safe to say that the two most recent national losers won’t be joining this company any time soon.</p><p>Mitt Romney has been publicly quiet since his brief remarks on election night, but he <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-romney-election-campaign-donors-20121114,0,5622330.story">told his top donors on a conference call</a> yesterday that Barack Obama had won by giving “very generous” freebies to key constituencies, including blacks, Hispanics and young people.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/the_sore_losers_club_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/the_sore_losers_club_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>81</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 glaring contradictions that sank the GOP</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/5_glaring_contradictions_that_sank_the_gop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/5_glaring_contradictions_that_sank_the_gop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 14:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Mourdock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13099193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republicans will point to the country's shifting demographics, but they ultimately have only themselves to blame]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Enough uplifting, all-purpose notions of why Obama and Democrats prevailed, some pertinent (like demographics), many laughable: it was Sandy the storm, tons of “stuff” Obama promised, or Democratic voter repression (right!). “No, no,” disbelievers shout, “Mitt was too moderate, or too extreme, his V.P. too fixated.” Or Obama was simply superior on the stump. Below such media noise rumbles a larger tectonic, thus my nomination for what made this election significant: a gang of rightwing contradictions reared up, then crashed and burned.</p><p>While this trend transcends any one folly, Romney was the ideal, fossilized Republican awash in a fantasy golden age when bountiful bosses generated jobs and pampered laborers. Likewise, what bizarre political deviance tabbed Paul Ryan as more than a shrill ideologue with zero national clout? For the first time, both misfits atop a national ticket lost their home states. Remarkably, even that matchless twosome, McCain-Palin, outpolled (and outwinked) the votes to Romney-Ryan.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/5_glaring_contradictions_that_sank_the_gop/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/5_glaring_contradictions_that_sank_the_gop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Must-see morning clip</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/must_see_morning_clip_65/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/must_see_morning_clip_65/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 12:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morning Clip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimmy Kimmel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jimmy kimmel live]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13072541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jimmy Kimmel interviews a man who tattooed his face with the Romney/Ryan campaign logo]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comedian Jimmy Kimmel interviews Eric Hartsburg, the man who received $15,000 for tattooing the Romney/Ryan campaign logo on his face. Hartsburg says he plans to keep the tattoo "for the rest of my life," and says that his forehead space is still for sale.</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/rji_dysPfWQ" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/must_see_morning_clip_65/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/must_see_morning_clip_65/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jason Biggs&#8217; vulgar tweets</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/jason_biggss_vulgar_tweets/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/jason_biggss_vulgar_tweets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ann Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Biggs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13071169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are the salvos that the "American Pie" star refused to apologize for]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>The "American Pie" star refused to apologize for the following tweets which he sent forth during the Republican Convention. WARNING, they are graphic and vulgar and may not be appropriate for some readers.</p><p><a href="https://twitter.com/JasonBiggs">Jason Biggs@<strong>JasonBiggs</strong></a></p><p>I’d totes dip a pinky or two in Paul Ryan’s wife’s bleached asshole (she obvs bleaches her asshole). <a href="https://twitter.com/search/?q=%23RNC"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;">#</span><strong>RNC</strong></a></p><p><a href="https://twitter.com/JasonBiggs/statuses/241008811027099648">29 Aug 12</a></p><p><a href="https://twitter.com/JasonBiggs">Jason Biggs@<strong>JasonBiggs</strong></a></p><p>I bet there’s footage somewhere of Paul Ryan jerking off to a close-up photo of his widow’s peak. <a href="https://twitter.com/search/?q=%23RNC"><span style="text-decoration: line-through;">#</span><strong>RNC</strong></a></p><p><a href="https://twitter.com/JasonBiggs/statuses/241008041162600449">29 Aug 12</a></p><p><a href="https://twitter.com/JasonBiggs">Jason Biggs@<strong>JasonBiggs</strong></a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/jason_biggss_vulgar_tweets/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/jason_biggss_vulgar_tweets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jason Biggs defends wildly vulgar tweets</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/jason_biggs_defends_tweeting_ways/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/jason_biggs_defends_tweeting_ways/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Biggs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/jason_biggs_defends_tweeting_ways/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The "American Pie" star stands up for himself]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NEW YORK (AP) — Jason Biggs is brushing off criticism he received during the recent election season for vulgar tweets that referenced the wives of both Republican Mitt Romney and his running mate in the presidential race, Paul Ryan.</p><p>The "American Pie" star took heat for off-color comments posted to his Twitter feed at the time of the Republican National Convention in August. The outpouring of criticism from parents groups, pundits and others led Nickelodeon to issue an apology for the actor's comments on the social media website. Biggs is providing one of the voices in the cable TV station's new animated series "Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles."</p><p>"I made a political tweet, so I got a little bit of heat from the right," he said.</p><p>With elections over, Biggs says he's moving on.</p><p>He appeared Monday night in New York at the annual 24 Hour Plays event, which was sponsored by luxury pen-maker Montblanc to benefit the Urban Arts Partnership. The benefit draws more than two dozen actors who write, rehearse, and perform one of six plays that they began working on the night before.</p><p>Biggs' tweets have also poked fun at the Kardashians, Amanda Bynes, Lindsay Lohan and the ABC show "The Bachelorette."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/jason_biggs_defends_tweeting_ways/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/jason_biggs_defends_tweeting_ways/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romney is rapidly losing Facebook friends</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/romney_is_rapidly_losing_facebook_friends/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/romney_is_rapidly_losing_facebook_friends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 18:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13068805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At a rate of 847 friends per hour]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another downside to losing an election: Say goodbye to your Facebook friends.</p><p>At least, that's the case for Mitt Romney, who has lost an average of 847 Facebook friends per hour, <a href="http://mashable.com/2012/11/10/mitt-romney-is-losing-847-facebook-friends-per-hour/">Mashable</a> reports.</p><p>Three days after he conceded, Romney had already lost 50,000 "likes" on Facebook, though he was still gaining fans up until Tuesday.</p><p>From Mashable:</p><blockquote><p>"Soon after Romney conceded the election, though, his social media followers began dropping quickly. Since 11:30 on Tuesday, more than 55,025 users have unliked the Massachusetts Governor, at a rate of about 847 an hour.</p> <p>Romney’s actually gained 17,601 Twitter followers since he lost the election. That’s odd, and might be more evidence of bot activity more than human interest, considering he hasn’t tweeted since 5:55 on Election Day—a final relic of a message reads 'With your help, we will turn our country around and get America back on the path to prosperity. Please vote today.'"</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/romney_is_rapidly_losing_facebook_friends/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/romney_is_rapidly_losing_facebook_friends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Joe Biden&#8217;s new role: &#8220;Parks and Recreation&#8221; guest star</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/joe_bidens_new_role_parks_and_recreation_guest_star/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/joe_bidens_new_role_parks_and_recreation_guest_star/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 19:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leslie knope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Poehler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parks and Recreation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parks and Rec]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13066270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Knope finally meets the man of her dreams. Here's why the vice president is worthy of her (and our) love]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, life, thank you thank you thank you. In what sounds like the greatest pairing since that first pretzel got dipped in a jar of Nutella, it's been announced that Vice President and cantankerous, malarkey-calling uncle to an entire nation <a href="http://insidetv.ew.com/2012/11/07/parks-and-recreation-joe-biden/">Joe Biden is guest-starring on next week's episode of "Parks and Recreation."</a> What is there to say today but, "<em>Wheeeeeeeeee!</em>"</p><p>It helps, of course, especially for those of us here in the godless left-wing media in the Gotham full of sodomites, that Biden makes his appearance as a man heading into his second term. For Amy Poehler's city councilwoman Leslie Knope to have a brush with a guy who'd just lost to <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/paul_ryan_flaunts_his_political_muscles/ ">Mr. Backwards Baseball Cap</a> would have been a downer moment for the sitcom, a little hiss of air going out of the bit's tires. The scene, which was gently adjusted for two possible election outcomes, had to be kept top secret until after Nov. 6, lest <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/08/arts/television/joe-biden-to-appear-on-parks-and-recreation.html?_r=0">"some provision might have to be made to give the Republican vice-presidential nominee, Representative Paul Ryan, a similar cameo."</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/joe_bidens_new_role_parks_and_recreation_guest_star/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/joe_bidens_new_role_parks_and_recreation_guest_star/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>17 best excuses for Romney&#8217;s defeat</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/seventeen_best_excuses_romneys_defeat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/seventeen_best_excuses_romneys_defeat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 19:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Weeklings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Satire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Bird]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13066501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because the GOP will never admit it nominated a morally-bankrupt misogynist who made his living outsourcing jobs]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.theweeklings.com"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/TheWeeklings-1.jpg" alt="The Weeklings" align="left" /></a>  GOT SEVENTEEN EXCUSES for losing, but being a mendacious, flip-flopping, misogynistic, morally-bankrupt super-millionaire who made a fortune outsourcing American jobs, isn’t one of them.</p><p>What happened to the <em>Mittmentum</em>? <em>It’s Mitt-diculous!</em> Did Hurricane Sandy blow Benghazi out of the water? Was it the economy? Was it a case of Bin Laden-is-dead-and-Chevy-is-alive? Was it <em>Hell Hath No Fury Like A Woman Who Doesn’t Want the Government in her Vagina</em>?</p><p>Here are just a few of the excuses why, according to the GOP, Lord Mittens will not be the next president of the United States:</p><p><strong>1.</strong>  Someone forgot to block off the wheelchair ramps in Ohio.</p><p><strong>2.</strong>  It’s not Mitt Romney’s fault that racism just isn’t as <em>fashionable </em>as it used to be. What’s next? Petticoats? Butter churns? Blood-letting?</p><p><strong>3.</strong>  No one could have anticipated that single mothers (the ones whose children Mitt blames for all the gun violence in this country) owned shoes with such good arch support they could wait in line for <em>nine hours</em> to vote.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/seventeen_best_excuses_romneys_defeat/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/seventeen_best_excuses_romneys_defeat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Watch Mitt Romney&#8217;s concession speech</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/watch_mitt_romneys_concession_speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/watch_mitt_romneys_concession_speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 14:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 election]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13065266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Romney congratulated Obama and said that besides marriage, picking Paul Ryan was "the best choice I've ever made."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><script type='text/javascript' src='http://pshared.5min.com/Scripts/PlayerSeed.js?sid=1236&amp;width=420&amp;height=280&amp;shuffle=0&amp;playList=517531130'></script></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/watch_mitt_romneys_concession_speech/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/watch_mitt_romneys_concession_speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The attacks on Romney that didn&#8217;t land</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/04/the_romney_attacks_that_didnt_land/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/04/the_romney_attacks_that_didnt_land/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2012 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seamus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romney's tax returns]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13061434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where are his tax returns, again? And more. . . ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitt Romney was never the most opposition research target-rich candidate for the Republican presidential nomination -- miss you, Newt -- with his cheerful moral rectitude and clean living. But there was plenty of material in his charmed life. And the press and the Obama campaign exploited some of it quite effectively, helpfully introducing Americans to Bain Capital and the practice of leveraged buyouts.</p><p>But Romney had some rather glaring weaknesses as a candidate that weren't successfully exploited. For an unprincipled flip-flopping weirdo plutocrat with no ability to connect with normal humans, he's polling quite decently! Here are some of the Romney attacks that for whatever reason, never quite connected.</p><p>(You know how conservatives still bitterly/crazily claim that Obama wasn't properly <em>vetted?</em> This is sort of like that, except my "things that weren't vetted" are based in reality and not insane conspiracy theories.)</p><p><strong>His Tax Returns</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/04/the_romney_attacks_that_didnt_land/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/04/the_romney_attacks_that_didnt_land/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tom Frank: Obama&#8217;s made left &#8220;futile and irrelevant&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/03/tom_frank_obamas_made_left_futile_and_irrelevant/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/03/tom_frank_obamas_made_left_futile_and_irrelevant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2012 15:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricane Sandy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nate Silver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Frank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pity the billionaire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13060794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama's the clear choice Tuesday. But the writer doubts progressives will find a louder voice in a second term]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There have been poetic, soaring odes written in support of President Obama's reelection in recent days.</p><p>The New Yorker <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/talk/comment/2012/10/29/121029taco_talk_editors">endorsed</a> him by noting "a run of ambitious legislative, social, and foreign-policy successes that relieved a large measure of the human suffering and national shame inflicted by the Bush Administration. Obama has renewed the honor of the office he holds."</p><p>Jonathan Chait of New York magazine, in a piece titled "Why He Is a Great President. Yes, Great," <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2012/10/barack-obama-is-a-great-president-yes-great.html">noted</a> that "what can be said without equivocation is that Obama has proven himself morally, intellectually, temperamentally, and strategically. In my lifetime, or my parents’, he is easily the best president."</p><p>And yet. It's possible to agree with them and still wince when the New Yorker ascribes disappointment in Obama, in part, to "a reflection of the fantastical expectations that are attached to him."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/03/tom_frank_obamas_made_left_futile_and_irrelevant/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/03/tom_frank_obamas_made_left_futile_and_irrelevant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>105</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ryan&#8217;s challenger campaigns against &#8230; no one</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/31/ryans_challenger_campaigns_against_no_one/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/31/ryans_challenger_campaigns_against_no_one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 18:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Zerban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://http://www.salon.com/2012/10/31/ryans_challenger_campaigns_against_no_one/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Democrat Rob Zerban has been running against an absent Paul Ryan in Wisconsin]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JANESVILLE, Wis. (AP) — Rob Zerban was ready for a brawl when he decided to run for Paul Ryan's congressional seat in southern Wisconsin. Mitt Romney changed all when he picked Ryan as his running mate.</p><p>Ryan is still running for the seat he's held for seven terms, but the national race has consumed him. Aside from a stream of generic television ads, Ryan hasn't campaigned for his seat since Romney tapped him.</p><p>Zerban has accused Ryan of abandoning his district. Last week the Kenosha Democrat launched a "Focus on the First" mini-campaign of volunteer work to play up that he cares about the locals. But Ryan's absence doesn't appear to have hurt him. Even Democrats aren't optimistic about Zerban's chances of winning.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/31/ryans_challenger_campaigns_against_no_one/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/31/ryans_challenger_campaigns_against_no_one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>