<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Paul Ryan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/paul_ryan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 17:26:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>House GOPer: Romney was the kid who couldn&#8217;t explain his science project</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/house_goper_romney_was_the_kid_who_couldnt_explain_his_science_project/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/house_goper_romney_was_the_kid_who_couldnt_explain_his_science_project/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 21:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pete Sessions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13288073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rep. Pete Sessions has a theory about why Mitt Romney lost the election ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Pete Sessions, R-Texas, doesn't think that the Republican party really needs to rebrand - it just needs to pick better candidates. “We are winning when we have good candidates,” he told <a href="http://frontburner.dmagazine.com/2013/05/01/pete-sessions-likens-mitt-romney-to-a-kid-who-couldnt-explain-his-science-project/">D Magazine</a>. “We lose when we have bad candidates.”</p><p>He continued that Mitt Romney in particular was one of those bad candidates. “Mitt Romney appeared like a kid who showed up for his science project and the teacher said, ‘Explain it,’ and Mitt couldn’t do it,” Sessions said. “His ‘dad,’ Paul Ryan, explained it to him, but Mitt didn’t get it. … That’s why we lost the last election.”</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/house_goper_romney_was_the_kid_who_couldnt_explain_his_science_project/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/house_goper_romney_was_the_kid_who_couldnt_explain_his_science_project/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paul Ryan has change of heart, now supports gay adoption</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/paul_ryan_has_change_of_heart_now_supports_gay_adoption/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/paul_ryan_has_change_of_heart_now_supports_gay_adoption/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 17:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay adoption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13286846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Wisconsin Republican says he now supports adoption rights for gay couples, but continues to oppose gay marriage]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wisconsin Rep. and former vice-presidential candidate Paul Ryan has had a change of heart about gay couples adopting, and now believes that gay people can provide loving homes to children who need families. But the House Republican still adamantly opposes <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/the_new_nicer_anti_gay_marriage_debate/" target="_blank">equal marriage</a>, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/paul_ryan_to_gop_dont_abandon_abortion_fight/" target="_blank">reproductive rights</a> and safe access to abortion care, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/13/opinion/the-worst-of-paul-ryans-budgets.html?_r=0" target="_blank">Medicare</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/17/paul_ryans_budget_plan_would_literally_kill_thousands_of_americans_partner/" target="_blank">vital services</a> for low-income families, among <a href="http://votesmart.org/candidate/key-votes/26344/paul-ryan#.UYFORyvP3fM" target="_blank">other things</a>.</p><p>So, in effect, Ryan has made himself .001 percent less awful than he was before.</p><p>In response to a question about gay rights, Ryan chalked his 1999 vote to ban gay adoption in the District of Columbia to a freshman foible during his first term in Congress:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/paul_ryan_has_change_of_heart_now_supports_gay_adoption/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/paul_ryan_has_change_of_heart_now_supports_gay_adoption/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Austerity opposition goes mainstream</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/a_lesson_to_the_left_it_will_no_longer_do_to_simply_be_anti_austerity_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/a_lesson_to_the_left_it_will_no_longer_do_to_simply_be_anti_austerity_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacobin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austerity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13283171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bad data, dodgy assumptions and a basic inability to use Microsoft Excel may have doomed the economic movement]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jacobinmag.com"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/Jacobin.jpg" alt="Jacobin" /></a>Austerity is collecting a lot of high-flying enemies these days. In the past month the <a href="http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/6c023bdc-a93c-11e2-a096-00144feabdc0.html">manager of PIMCO</a>, the largest bond-buying firm in the world, top figures <a href="http://blogs.ft.com/the-a-list/2013/04/03/europe-needs-to-focus-more-on-reform-not-just-austerity/#axzz2RPkoZRrD">at Blackrock</a>, one of the most influential investment banks in the world, the President of the European Commission, <a href="http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/73f2aafe-ab65-11e2-ac71-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2RO82qRgs">Jose Manuel Barroso</a>, and <a href="http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/60b7a4ec-ab58-11e2-8c63-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2RO82qRgs">Martin Wolf</a>, world-renowned finance commentator for the <em>Financial Times</em>, have all come out vigorously against austerity.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/a_lesson_to_the_left_it_will_no_longer_do_to_simply_be_anti_austerity_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/a_lesson_to_the_left_it_will_no_longer_do_to_simply_be_anti_austerity_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Former Ryan campaign intern charged with nude picture blackmail scheme</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/former_ryan_campaign_intern_charged_with_nude_picture_blackmail_scheme/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/former_ryan_campaign_intern_charged_with_nude_picture_blackmail_scheme/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 13:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Savader]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13280652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adam Savader allegedly threatened to publish nude pictures of 15 women unless they sent him more pictures]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam Savader, a former campaign intern to Paul Ryan and Newt Gingrich, was arrested and charged with "Internet extortion and cyber stalking," for an alleged scheme to blackmail women with naked pictures of themselves.</p><p>From the FBI's <a href="http://www.fbi.gov/detroit/press-releases/2013/new-york-man-charged-with-internet-extortion-and-cyber-stalking">press release</a> on the arrest:</p><blockquote><p>According to the affidavit, from May 2012 through February 2013, Adam Paul Savader sent anonymous text messages using Google Voice numbers to 15 women stating that he had nude photographs of the women and threatening to distribute the nude photographs to the women’s friends and family members unless the women sent him more nude photographs of themselves. Savader sent some of the victims links to a photo-sharing website where nude pictures of the victims had been posted.</p></blockquote><p>From the <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/romney-campaign-intern-busted-nude-pics-blackmail-scheme-article-1.1325621">New York Daily News</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/former_ryan_campaign_intern_charged_with_nude_picture_blackmail_scheme/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/former_ryan_campaign_intern_charged_with_nude_picture_blackmail_scheme/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When wonks burn politicians</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/20/when_policy_wonks_burn_politicians_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/20/when_policy_wonks_burn_politicians_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacobin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reinhartt-Rogoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Yglesias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Konczal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13277017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Reinhart-Rogoff study should serve as a cautionary tale for pols relying on spreadsheets to dictate policy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jacobinmag.com"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/Jacobin.jpg" alt="Jacobin" /></a> The economics blogosphere is buzzing about the errors that were recently exposed in an <a href="http://qz.com/75117/how-influential-was-the-study-warning-high-debt-kills-growth/">influential</a> paper by Carmen Reinhart, Vincent Reinhart, and Kenneth Rogoff, which claimed that countries with high levels of debt tend to have slower economic growth. See <a href="http://www.nextnewdeal.net/rortybomb/researchers-finally-replicated-reinhart-rogoff-and-there-are-serious-problems">Mike Konczal</a> for the summary or <a href="http://www.peri.umass.edu/236/hash/31e2ff374b6377b2ddec04deaa6388b1/publication/566/">here</a> for the full paper by Thomas Herndon, Michael Ash, and Robert Pollin.</p><p>In short, the original Reinhart-Rogoff paper had three significant problems, ranging from cherry-picking data, to dubious weighting schemes, to —most embarrassing of all — an Excel spreadsheet error that accidentally left out several crucial data points.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/20/when_policy_wonks_burn_politicians_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/20/when_policy_wonks_burn_politicians_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Best of the Salon limerick contest</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/14/best_of_the_salon_limerick_contest_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/14/best_of_the_salon_limerick_contest_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2013 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poetry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers and Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salon limerick contest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manti Te'o]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R-Wis.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne LaPierre]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13270425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part two: A roundup of some of our favorite poetic news items]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p id="internal-source-marker_0.39253279558081733" dir="ltr">The best limericks submitted by Salon readers since the election:</p><p dir="ltr">So we’ve come to this point, as a nation,</p><p dir="ltr">Where a white man with money and station,</p><p dir="ltr">Is no longer a shoe-in,</p><p dir="ltr">So the Right Wing’s now stewin’:</p><p dir="ltr">“’Tis the End of Civilization!”</p><p dir="ltr">Bruce F. Cole</p><p dir="ltr">Kamuela, Hawaii</p><p dir="ltr">From Delaware hails our VP,</p><p dir="ltr">A fiscal cliff jumper is he.</p><p dir="ltr">He'll work on your pecs,</p><p dir="ltr">Offer old ladies sex,</p><p dir="ltr">Won't someone please put this guy on TV?</p><p dir="ltr">Josh Klemons</p><p dir="ltr">Madison, Wis.</p><p dir="ltr">Where’s Obama’s diversity minder–</p><p dir="ltr">His “qualified female” staff finder?</p><p dir="ltr">He’s named white guys galore,</p><p dir="ltr">To positions top-drawer,</p><p dir="ltr">Perhaps he should borrow Mitt’s binder.</p><p dir="ltr"><a href="http://www.madkane.com/">Madeleine Begun Kane</a></p><p dir="ltr">Bayside, Queens</p><p dir="ltr">Did we have an assault weapons binge?</p><p dir="ltr">Just the thought should make all of us cringe.</p><p dir="ltr">Can we trust NRA,</p><p dir="ltr">To be honest when they,</p><p dir="ltr">Are the voice of a lunatic fringe?</p><p dir="ltr">Stephen Whitred</p><p dir="ltr">Barriere, B.C., Canada</p><p dir="ltr">In a tale of pro cycling woe,</p><p dir="ltr">Doping brought down a mighty hero.</p><p dir="ltr">But one detail I find,</p><p dir="ltr">Really frazzles my mind,</p><p dir="ltr">Who knew Oprah still had her own show?</p><p dir="ltr">Tom Foltz</p><p dir="ltr">Fort Wayne, Ind.</p><p dir="ltr">Although your new limerick contest is thrillin',</p><p dir="ltr">My brain appears not to be willin'</p><p dir="ltr">When every new verse</p><p dir="ltr">Than the last one is worse.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/14/best_of_the_salon_limerick_contest_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/14/best_of_the_salon_limerick_contest_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paul Ryan to GOP:  Don&#8217;t abandon abortion fight</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/paul_ryan_to_gop_dont_abandon_abortion_fight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/paul_ryan_to_gop_dont_abandon_abortion_fight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 14:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP Civil War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13268979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While the GOP tries to runs away from gay marriage, it shouldn't give up on abortion, the ex-V.P. candidate says]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/tony_perkins_stop_donating_to_the_gop/">ongoing war</a> within the conservative movement over whether the GOP should continue its fight on social issues, Rep. Paul Ryan becomes one of the highest-profile Republican officials to weigh in last night, telling an antiabortion group that the GOP must continue its fight against choice.</p><p>"Our critics say we should abandon our pro-life beliefs. But that would only demoralize our voters," the Hill <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/healthwatch/abortion/293499-paul-ryan-gop-must-stay-strong-on-abortion-to-win-elections-">reports</a> Ryan told the Susan B. Anthony List gala last night. "It’s an odd strategy, I think: the cynical ploy followed by the thumping defeat."</p><p>"Our task isn't to purge our ranks. It's to grow them," Ryan said at the event in Washington.</p><p>The congressman is known primarily as a budget wonk, but is well to the right of many Republicans on abortion, opposing it in all cases (including rape and incest) except for when the life of the mother is in danger.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/paul_ryan_to_gop_dont_abandon_abortion_fight/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/paul_ryan_to_gop_dont_abandon_abortion_fight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s entitlement plan was four years in the making</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/obamas_entitlement_plan_was_four_years_in_the_making/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/obamas_entitlement_plan_was_four_years_in_the_making/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cutting social security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicaid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13268016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President’s desire to cut Social Security was public before he even took office. Why did so many turn a blind eye?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While many Democrats are expressing shock and outrage that President Obama, a Democrat, would propose to cut Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, the truth is they shouldn’t be surprised. Obama’s desire to make these cuts dates back at least four years – since before his presidency, even -- and has been largely in plain view. We just chose to willfully ignore it, and pretend it wasn’t true.</p><p>Obama didn’t talk about it when he first campaigned for the job -- if he had, he surely wouldn’t have won the Democratic nomination, and may not even have beaten John McCain, since not even Republican presidential candidates publicly campaign to weaken what their party calls “entitlements.” Everyone sensibly had assumed that no Democrat would want to weaken or reduce the crowning achievements of Democratic Presidents Franklin Roosevelt and Lyndon Johnson, not to mention of the Democratic Party itself. But immediately after getting elected, Barack Obama admitted he wanted to do just that.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/obamas_entitlement_plan_was_four_years_in_the_making/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/obamas_entitlement_plan_was_four_years_in_the_making/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Best of the Salon limerick contest</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/best_of_the_salon_limerick_contest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/best_of_the_salon_limerick_contest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salon limerick contest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salon Limerick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poetry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers and Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seamus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seamus the dog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rafalca]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13263264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part 1: The election]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p dir="ltr">in the first compilation of the Salon limerick contest, here are the best reader submitted limericks from the election:</p><p dir="ltr">As travel arrangements were set,</p><p dir="ltr">Rafalca had reason to fret,</p><p dir="ltr">When Romney explained,</p><p dir="ltr">To get to the Games,</p><p dir="ltr">She'd be strapped to the roof of the jet!</p><p dir="ltr">Pete DeVriese</p><p dir="ltr">Oakland, Calif.</p><p><strong><strong><br /> </strong></strong></p><p dir="ltr">The Romney's were off with a start.</p><p dir="ltr">Regrettably, Seamus had farts.</p><p dir="ltr">So into the crate,</p><p dir="ltr">If he makes it that's great.</p><p dir="ltr">If not, Mitt will sell off the parts.</p><p dir="ltr">Michael Peterson</p><p dir="ltr">Willowbrook, Ill.</p><p><strong><strong><br /> </strong></strong></p><p dir="ltr">Mitt’s not vulgar, profane or salacious.</p><p dir="ltr">He would never offend! Good gracious!</p><p dir="ltr">But in unctuous perfection,</p><p dir="ltr">He seeks his election,</p><p dir="ltr">In a manner sublimely mendacious.</p><p dir="ltr">Quentin Sullivan</p><p dir="ltr">Haverhill, Mass.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p dir="ltr">Paul Ryan is sure that it's true.</p><p dir="ltr">All abortions are wicked to do.</p><p dir="ltr">Not for rape, or incest,</p><p dir="ltr">Even death - Paul knows best.</p><p dir="ltr">For a zygote's worth much more than you.</p><p dir="ltr">Paul Bamborough</p><p dir="ltr">Norway</p><p><strong><strong><br /> </strong></strong></p><p dir="ltr">RNC speakers begin to assemble,</p><p dir="ltr">And their rhetoric starts to dissemble.</p><p dir="ltr">From Rubio to Ryan.</p><p dir="ltr">There'll be no shortage of lyin'.</p><p dir="ltr">Causing fact-checkers all over to tremble.</p><p dir="ltr">Jim Brown</p><p dir="ltr">Scarsdale, N.Y.</p><p><strong><strong><br /> </strong></strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/best_of_the_salon_limerick_contest/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/best_of_the_salon_limerick_contest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Austerity&#8217;s forgotten victims: State universities</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/austeritys_forgotten_victim_state_universities_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/austeritys_forgotten_victim_state_universities_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 14:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austerity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[austerity economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13251095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Foolish economic policies are speeding America’s decline and placing terrible burdens on the next generation]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Wise men and politicians are telling us that the federal debt will burden our children and must be reduced. But the real burden on young people is educational debt fueled by wrong-headed austerity policies. Our children are graduating college with overwhelming debts of $100,000 or more, and even those who fail to graduate still leave college with ample college debts. College debt has surpassed credit-card debt, and the president and Congress have wrangled about the interest rate to charge.</p><p>How did we get into this situation?</p><p>The trail leads through federal-state interactions, like so much of American history. States were largely independent of the federal government until the 1960s. The federal government began at that time to provide resources for states to expand their activities in healthcare and then other activities as well. These grants have risen from well under $1 billion a year to around $500 billion in recent years. States rely on these funds to give grants to cities and for helping with many other expenses.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/austeritys_forgotten_victim_state_universities_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/austeritys_forgotten_victim_state_universities_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paul Ryan declares war on the poor</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/paul_ryan_declares_war_on_the_poor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/paul_ryan_declares_war_on_the_poor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nobel Prize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joseph Stiglitz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13248553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[His budget proposal would only exacerbate our country's glaring income inequality. How heartless can the GOP be?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to the Republican Party’s budget proposal that passed the U.S. House this week, I agree with those who find it strange that anyone sees the initiative as a serious attempt to “grow the economy,” as Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., claims. I also agree that the now-standard barrage of reports that accompany such an initiative render most non-political junkies confused, bored or both.</p><p>However, all of that doesn’t mean the proposal Ryan spearheaded is unimportant, nor does it mean that there are no worthwhile analyses to explain that significance. On the contrary, the proposal is quite important because it endorses an economic war waged by the upper class against everyone else. Two simple studies make this war painfully obvious.</p><p>To properly contextualize those studies, first keep in mind three facts: 1) According to Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz, “The upper 1 percent of Americans are now taking in nearly a quarter of the nation’s income every year” and control 40 percent of the nation’s total wealth, 2) the bottom 80 percent of Americans own just 7 percent of the nation’s wealth, and 3) Stiglitz notes that “while the top 1 percent have seen their incomes rise 18 percent over the past decade, those in the middle have actually seen their incomes fall.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/paul_ryan_declares_war_on_the_poor/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/paul_ryan_declares_war_on_the_poor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>106</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House expected to pass budget plan with deep cuts</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/house_expected_to_pass_budget_plan_with_deep_cuts_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/house_expected_to_pass_budget_plan_with_deep_cuts_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 12:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Winehouse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13247714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Senate, meanwhile, is working toward the passage of a rival budget measure]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — A familiar budget plan to sharply cut safety-net programs for the poor and clamp down on domestic agencies performing the nuts-and-bolts programs of the government is cruising to passage in the tea party-flavored House.</p><p>The Republican measure is advancing to the finish line in the House as the Senate starts a lengthy slog toward passage of a rival budget measure. It takes a sharply different view, restoring automatic cuts to agency budgets and increasing taxes by $1 trillion over the coming decade.</p><p>The dueling budget plans are anchored on opposite ends of the ideological spectrum in Washington, appealing to core partisans in the warring parties gridlocked over persistent budget deficits. President Barack Obama is exploring the chances of forging a middle path that blends new taxes and modest curbs to government benefits programs.</p><p>The sharp contrast over the 2014 budget and beyond came as the House is positioned to clear unfinished budget business — a sweeping, government-wide funding bill to keep Cabinet agencies running through the 2013 budget year, which ends Sept. 30.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/house_expected_to_pass_budget_plan_with_deep_cuts_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/house_expected_to_pass_budget_plan_with_deep_cuts_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Faith leaders descend on Washington, call for a &#8220;moral budget&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/faith_leaders_descend_on_washington_call_for_a_moral_budget/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/faith_leaders_descend_on_washington_call_for_a_moral_budget/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sister simone campbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rep. paul ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austerity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit hawks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13246777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Organizers of the Loaves and Fishes Day of Action will call on Congress to reject Rep. Ryan's "austerity gospel"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Faith leaders will descend on Washington for a Loaves and Fishes Day of Action on Wednesday. There message for Congress? Reject the Ryan austerity budget and stop "worshipping at the altar of deficit reduction."</p><p>In a <a href="http://www.networklobby.org/legislation/we-oppose-rep-ryans-new-budget-proposal" target="_blank">statement</a> from NETWORK, the Sister Simone Campbell-led social justice organization denounced Rep. Paul Ryan's (R-Wis.) budget as creating "untenable situations for those struggling to survive" through cuts to Medicaid and the social safety net.</p><p>In a multi-state, grassroots effort against austerity cuts, a coalition of faith leaders have organized events around the country on Wednesday, including <a href="http://arkansasmatters.com/fulltext?nxd_id=646992" target="_blank">delivering loaves and fishes</a> to members of the House of Representatives (a reference the Biblical story of having enough during a time of scarcity).</p><p>They've also released an animated message about "finding the political courage to pass a moral budget."</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/U3VQtSKR76Q" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/faith_leaders_descend_on_washington_call_for_a_moral_budget/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/faith_leaders_descend_on_washington_call_for_a_moral_budget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minimum wage critics are &#8220;hopelessly reactionary&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/minimum_wage_critics_are_hopelessly_reactionary_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/minimum_wage_critics_are_hopelessly_reactionary_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 17:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Next New Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minimum wage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Budget Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13245794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FDR had no patience for those opposed to guaranteeing American workers a livable wage, and neither should Obama]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nextnewdeal.net/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/05/next-new-deal-logo.png" alt="Next New Deal" /></a></p><blockquote><p>Our Nation so richly endowed with natural resources and with a capable and industrious population should be able to devise ways and means of insuring to all our able-bodied working men and women a fair day's pay for a fair day's work. A self-supporting and self-respecting democracy can plead no justification for the existence of child labor, no economic reason for chiseling workers' wages or stretching workers' hours.</p></blockquote><p>Enlightened business is learning that competition ought not to cause bad social consequences which inevitably react upon the profits of business itself. All but the hopelessly reactionary will agree that to conserve our primary resources of man power, government must have some control over maximum hours, minimum wages, the evil of child labor and the exploitation of unorganized labor. –<a href="http://publicpolicy.pepperdine.edu/faculty-research/new-deal/roosevelt-speeches/fr052437.htm" target="_blank">FDR, May 1937</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/minimum_wage_critics_are_hopelessly_reactionary_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/minimum_wage_critics_are_hopelessly_reactionary_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP Senate candidate: Paul Ryan too moderate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/paul_broun_op_ed_slams_paul_ryans_budget_plan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/paul_broun_op_ed_slams_paul_ryans_budget_plan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 15:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Broun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Showdown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13245650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rep. Paul Broun, who is running for Georgia's Senate seat, pens Op-Ed demanding more austerity and cuts]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an Op-Ed for the<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/19/opinion/paul-ryans-ax-isnt-sharp-enough.html?nl=todaysheadlines&amp;emc=edit_th_20130319&amp;_r=2&amp;"> New York Times</a>, Tea Party Rep. Paul Broun, R-Ga., slams Paul Ryan's Medicare voucherization plan as not austere enough, argues that the Education and Energy departments should be cut, and says that in general Ryan's "ax isn't sharp enough."</p><p>"We ought to get rid of certain federal departments and agencies, stopping only to shift the role of governing back to the states, where it belongs," Broun writes. "The Departments of Education and Energy, for example, are two bloated bureaucracies that we don’t need; their core functions would be absorbed by the states through block grants, saving taxpayers <a href="http://crfb.org/document/primary-numbers-gop-candidates-and-national-debt">at least $500 billion</a> over the next decade."</p><p>From the Op-Ed:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/paul_broun_op_ed_slams_paul_ryans_budget_plan/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/paul_broun_op_ed_slams_paul_ryans_budget_plan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Republicans really view Social Security</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/how_republicans_really_view_social_security/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/how_republicans_really_view_social_security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 18:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cutting social security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chained CPI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13243680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Democratic president controversially seeks to reduce benefits, and Republicans shrug. Why? A GOP insider explains]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democrats surprised or angered by President Obama’s apparent willingness to reduce Social Security benefits may wonder why his entreaty has elicited mostly a snooze from Republicans, who speak often of their interest in "entitlement reform." I worked on Capitol Hill as an economist for several Republican lawmakers, so let me explain.</p><p>The first point to consider is that in reality, Obama and his fellow Democrats would only be persuaded to sign off on changes to Social Security as a part of a grand bargain, in which the Republicans gave up something major in return, like significant additional tax revenues. While suggestions by House leadership this weekend that the party would never accept additional revenue <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2013/03/17/a-moment-of-real-clarity-in-the-fiscal-debate/">under any circumstances</a> is just posturing, in my view, it's obviously still something conservatives have little reflexive enthusiasm for, having just swallowed them in January.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/how_republicans_really_view_social_security/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/how_republicans_really_view_social_security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP: We&#8217;ve been lying all along</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/boehners_debt_confession_reveals_gops_intentions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/boehners_debt_confession_reveals_gops_intentions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Krugman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bowles-Simpson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13244155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Boehner's admission that we don't really have a debt crisis reveals his party's ulterior, program-cutting motives]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never thought I'd write these words, but here goes: Thank you, John Boehner. Thank you, Mr. Speaker, for finally admitting on national television that all the fiscal cliffs, sequestrations and budget battles you've created are, indeed, artificially fabricated by ideologues and self-interested politicians and not the result of some imminent crisis that's out of our control.</p><p>America owes this debt of gratitude to Boehner after he finally came clean on yesterday's edition of <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2013/03/17/boehner_agrees_with_obama_we_do_not_have_an_immediate_debt_crisis.html">ABC's "This Week"</a> and admitted that "we do not have an immediate debt crisis." (His admission was followed up by Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan, who quickly echoed much the same sentiment on <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/paul-ryan-tells-cbs-bob-schieffer-we-do-not-have-a-debt-crisis/">CBS' "Face the Nation"</a>).</p><p>In offering up such a stunningly honest admission, the GOP leader has put himself on record as agreeing with President Obama, who has previously acknowledged that demonstrable reality. But the big news here isn't just about the politics of a Republican House speaker tacitly admitting they agree with a Democratic president. It is also about a bigger admission revealing the fact that the GOP's fiscal alarmism is not merely some natural reaction to reality, but a calculated means to other ideological ends.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/boehners_debt_confession_reveals_gops_intentions/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/boehners_debt_confession_reveals_gops_intentions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>102</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sunday shows haven&#8217;t learned</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/17/the_sunday_shows_learned_nothing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/17/the_sunday_shows_learned_nothing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Mar 2013 19:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunday morning shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunday show roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david gregory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13244007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week: Everyone agrees that we must get serious about Balancing the Budget, no one feels guilty about Iraq]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy tenth anniversary, Iraq War! To celebrate, America's Sunday Shows got you a Nearly Complete Absence of Any Sense of Responsibility or Indication That Any Lessons Were Learned. Here's what we got instead, today: Scaremongering about North Korea and Iran, great excitement about our new pope, and terribly unenlightening endless fact-free arguments about dueling federal budget proposals.</p><p>The big three Sunday Shows were all very budget-focused today, and on each of them everyone competed to be the most Serious about Balancing the Budget, which is obviously a self-evidently Good goal and not a totally unnecessary one. Not a single moderator came close to articulating the mainstream (in terms of economics, not politics) view that the government <em>doesn't have to</em> balance its budget. (It was not that long ago that the government was running a surplus and conservatives and economists kept saying on the TV that that was a bad thing, right?) Instead, they pressed their guests (usually one Democrat elected official and one Republican elected official) on how "serious" their party's proposals were, with "seriousness" measured in terms of how likely it was that a proposal would get passed by Congress and signed by the president. Alas, neither the Senate Democratic Budget nor the Ryan Budget came close to meeting the Seriousness standard. (Fun fact: The House Progressive Caucus budget <em>does not exist.</em> No one mentioned it on any of the three shows.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/17/the_sunday_shows_learned_nothing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/17/the_sunday_shows_learned_nothing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paul Ryan&#8217;s budget plan would literally kill thousands of Americans</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/17/paul_ryans_budget_plan_would_literally_kill_thousands_of_americans_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/17/paul_ryans_budget_plan_would_literally_kill_thousands_of_americans_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Mar 2013 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Next New Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicaid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13243078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It may sound hyperbolic, but the equation is simple: When more people lack health coverage, more people die]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nextnewdeal.net/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/05/next-new-deal-logo.png" alt="Next New Deal" /></a></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>I know you are not supposed to write in hyperbole, but sometimes the truth needs to be told. Paul Ryan’s budget, which kills Obamacare and cripples Medicare and Medicaid, would kill tens of thousands of people. Every year.</p><p>I have trouble with putting policy glosses on proposals that would deny health care coverage to millions of people and make care much more expensive to millions more. Because when more people lack health coverage, more people die. And when health costs prevent people from getting the care they need, they get more seriously ill.</p><p>How many people are we talking about? Estimates of the number of people who will die because they are uninsured vary, from about <a href="http://www.kaiserhealthnews.org/Daily-Reports/2012/June/21/mortality-and-the-uninsured.aspx">500</a> to <a href="http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2009/09/new-study-finds-45000-deaths-annually-linked-to-lack-of-health-coverage/">1,000</a> for every one million who lack coverage. Repealing Obamacare would block promised coverage for 32 million people, so that would mean somewhere from 16,000 to 32,000 each year who will die prematurely. Of course, since some Republican governors and legislatures are not implementing the expansion of Medicaid coverage in their states, some of those deaths are already on their hands.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/17/paul_ryans_budget_plan_would_literally_kill_thousands_of_americans_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/17/paul_ryans_budget_plan_would_literally_kill_thousands_of_americans_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why does anyone still take Paul Ryan seriously?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/why_is_paul_ryans_budget_being_taken_seriously_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/why_is_paul_ryans_budget_being_taken_seriously_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 22:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On the Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jared Bernstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13242831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[His failed V.P. bid may have made him a national figure, but his budget plan is hopelessly out of touch]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zipping across the land with a nice internet connection, so a good time to reflect a bit (looking down on clouds from above broadens the perspective a bit, I find).</p><p>So, I’m doing a radio interview last night, and moderately impressed with myself for being able to speak coherently about four different budgets: Ryan’s, Senate’s, POTUS (not out yet, but we can guess at the mix), and the <a href="http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/amidst-the-madness-lets-not-overlook-the-cdcs-budget/">CPC</a>.  Then I got asked a question which threw me a bit: why are Paul Ryan and his budget taken so seriously?</p><p>It wasn’t a snarky question.  It’s just that I’d been discussing the absolute non-reality of his proposal—how the numbers don’t begin to add up, the unrealistic budget cuts, the plethora of magic asterisks in the absence of actual proposals (the most egregious of which is: I’ll cuts taxes by $6-7 trillion over the next decade and offset the revenue losses with…um…sorry, gotta run).  And the interviewer was like, “OK…but if you’re right, why is his budget front page news such that he’s driving the debate?”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/why_is_paul_ryans_budget_being_taken_seriously_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/why_is_paul_ryans_budget_being_taken_seriously_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>