<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Peter King</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/peter_king/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 15:31:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Peter King: &#8220;I wouldn&#8217;t want to be involving New York with Ted Cruz&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/peter_king_i_wouldnt_want_to_be_involving_new_york_with_ted_cruz/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/peter_king_i_wouldnt_want_to_be_involving_new_york_with_ted_cruz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 13:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Cruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricane Sandy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["It's a little early to forgive and forget," King said of Cruz's vote against Hurricane Sandy aid]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Peter King doesn't think the New York GOP should have invited Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, to host its fundraiser this month, in light of his vote against Hurricane Sandy relief aid. "I wouldn't want to be involving New York with Ted Cruz," King said.</p><p>"He went out of his way to attack New York on the bill,” King, R-N.Y., added, the <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dc/2013/05/ny-gop-welcomes-ted-cruz-pete-king-does-not">New York Daily News</a> reports. "It's a little early to forgive and forget."</p><p>“It’s life and death,” King continued. “There were really false and phony charges made against the Sandy aid, and if Ted Cruz had prevailed, my constituents would be homeless."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/peter_king_i_wouldnt_want_to_be_involving_new_york_with_ted_cruz/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/peter_king_i_wouldnt_want_to_be_involving_new_york_with_ted_cruz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The importance of Keith Ellison</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/the_importance_of_keith_ellison/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/the_importance_of_keith_ellison/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keith Ellison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray Kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Bombing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim profiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13285248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At this time in history, the patriot who’s also a Muslim is our best defense against Islamic extremism and violence]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Progressives loved seeing <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/king_and_ellison_spar_over_surveilling_muslims/">Rep. Keith Ellison smack down his GOP congressional colleague Peter King</a> on "Meet the Press" Sunday, insisting that profiling Muslims in the wake of the Boston bombing is not only wrong but “ineffective law enforcement.” As Ellison warned: “Once you start saying, we’re going to dragnet or surveil a community, what you do is you ignore dangerous threats that are not in that community, and you go after people who don’t have anything to do with it.”</p><p>Of course right-wing bloggers hailed King as the winner in the debate – he wasn’t – and one sad sack even called Ellison <a href="http://patdollard.com/2013/04/muslim-ellison-and-peter-king-battle-over-whether-police-should-step-up-surveillance-of-muslim-community/">“the jihadi Democrat.”</a></p><p>The fact is, we need more Keith Ellisons in Congress. Not just because he’s a great progressive voice, supporting the president but challenging him strongly on his questionable austerity politics, but also because he’s a patriotic American who’s also a Muslim. He's crucial right now.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/the_importance_of_keith_ellison/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/the_importance_of_keith_ellison/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>101</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>King and Ellison spar over surveilling Muslims</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/king_and_ellison_spar_over_surveilling_muslims/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/king_and_ellison_spar_over_surveilling_muslims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 18:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keith Ellison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islamophobia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Bombings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13284202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["I think it's ineffective law enforcement to go after a particular community" said Ellison, who is Muslim]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Sunday's Meet The Press, Reps. Peter King, R-N.Y. and Keith Ellison, D-Minn., clashed over whether or not law enforcement should increase surveillance of Muslim communities in the wake of the attacks in Boston.</p><p>"Most Muslims are outstanding people, but the threat is coming from the Muslim community," said King, who was behind the House hearings on Muslim radicalization.</p><p>He continued: "And in previous times, when certain elements in a community are the ones responsible for crime, the police focus on it. For instance, in Boston, the F.B.I. never spoke to the Boston police about the older brother. And afterwards, there were no intelligence files in Boston on these type of people, these people inclined to terrorism. The F.B.I. never even got to examining him."</p><p><strong>"</strong>I think it's ineffective law enforcement to go after a particular community," said Ellison, who is Muslim. "Once you start saying, "We're going to dragnet or surveil a community," what you do is you ignore dangerous threats that are not in that community and you go after people who don't have anything to do with it."</p><p>Watch:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/king_and_ellison_spar_over_surveilling_muslims/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/king_and_ellison_spar_over_surveilling_muslims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rand Paul’s missing spine</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/rand_paul%e2%80%99s_missing_spine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/rand_paul%e2%80%99s_missing_spine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13280731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought he was a joke, but after he filibustered over drones, I wondered if I'd been wrong. Nope]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was on vacation when Rand Paul staged his filibuster to get more answers about drones from the Obama administration, or else I probably would have embarrassed myself by praising him. I’m concerned about drones and targeted assassinations and I think it’s a perfect place for a left-right alliance. So I was glad to see Paul’s filibuster.</p><p>“I will speak as long as it takes, until the alarm is sounded from coast to coast that our Constitution is important,” Paul declared. “That your rights to trial by jury are precious, that no American should be killed by a drone on American soil without first being charged with a crime, without first being found to be guilty by a court.”</p><p>Even though I disagree with Paul on virtually every other issue and generally consider him to be kind of a joke, I’d have been happy to be proven wrong. Maybe he had a conscience. Maybe he would become a much needed civil liberties leader on the right.</p><p>Alas, I haven’t been proven wrong. Mr. Filibuster, the tribune of civil liberties, now says that drones should have been used against the Tsarnaev brothers in Boston – not only that, <a href="http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/04/23/rand-pauls-reversal-i-dont-care-if-a-drone-kills-a-liquor-store-robber-with-50-in-cash/">he told Fox’s Neal Cavuto</a> they should even be used against someone robbing a liquor store.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/rand_paul%e2%80%99s_missing_spine/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/rand_paul%e2%80%99s_missing_spine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>148</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Peter King calls for &#8220;increased surveillance&#8221; of Muslims after Boston</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/20/peter_king_calls_for_increased_surveillance_of_muslims_after_boston/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/20/peter_king_calls_for_increased_surveillance_of_muslims_after_boston/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2013 14:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islamophobia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Bombings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13277267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's "where the threat is coming from," the House Republican said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Peter King, the Chair of the House subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence and the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/06/19/congresss_worst_islamophobe/">mastermind</a> behind hearings on the radicalization of Muslim-Americans, argued Friday that in the wake of the Boston bombings, law enforcement should increase surveillance in Muslim communities.</p><p>“Police have to be in the community, they have to build up as many sources as they can, and they have to realize that the threat is coming from the Muslim community and increase surveillance there,” King, a New York Republican, told the <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/node/346125">National Review</a>.</p><p>“We can’t be bound by political correctness,” he continued. “I think we need more police and more surveillance in the communities where the threat is coming from, whether it’s the Irish community with the Westies [an Irish-American gang in New York City], or the Italian community with the mafia, or the Muslim community with the Islamic terrorists.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/20/peter_king_calls_for_increased_surveillance_of_muslims_after_boston/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/20/peter_king_calls_for_increased_surveillance_of_muslims_after_boston/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans split on gun control filibuster</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/republicans_split_on_gun_control_filibuster/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/republicans_split_on_gun_control_filibuster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 16:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Filibuster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13265661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sen. Johnny Isakson said he thinks gun control legislation should get a “vote up or down"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As more Republican senators, including Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, announce that they will support a filibuster of gun control legislation, a few outliers have said that they disagree with blocking a vote.</p><p>Most recently, Sen. Johnny Isakson, R-Ga., <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/04/republicans-gun-vote-89798.html">said he thinks</a> there should be a “vote up or down."</p><p>“I’ll speak for myself on that question,” he said on CBS’s “This Morning.” “There’s no ambivalence on the gun issue, I think everyone knows what the issues are. We have not seen the final draft of the legislation that was produced, I understand, last night, but I think it deserves a vote up or down.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/republicans_split_on_gun_control_filibuster/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/republicans_split_on_gun_control_filibuster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Peter King: U.S. could preemptively attack North Korea</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/peter_king_u_s_could_preemptively_attack_north_korea/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/peter_king_u_s_could_preemptively_attack_north_korea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 16:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13260039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["I believe we have the right to take preemptive action," he said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y, says that the U.S. could preemptively launch a strike on North Korea, if provoked. "If we have good reason to believe there's going to be an attack, I believe we have the right to take preemptive action to protect ourselves," he said on CNN.</p><p>"I don't think we have to wait until Americans are killed or wounded or injured in any way," King continued. "I'm not saying we should be rushing into war, don't get me wrong, but if we have solid evidence that North Korea's going to take action, then I think we have a moral obligation and an absolute right to defend ourselves."</p><p>Watch, via <a href="http://thehill.com/video/house/291579-rep-king-us-could-make-preemptive-strike-on-north-korea">The Hill</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/peter_king_u_s_could_preemptively_attack_north_korea/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/peter_king_u_s_could_preemptively_attack_north_korea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NY congressman Peter King to step into boxing ring</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/ny_congressman_peter_king_to_step_into_boxing_ring_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/ny_congressman_peter_king_to_step_into_boxing_ring_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 16:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13221764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Republican will fight a two-round exhibition against New York state kickboxing champion "Irish" Josh Foley]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — Rep. Peter King of New York is lacing up his boxing gloves for a fight that has nothing to do with budget cuts.</p><p>The 68-year-old Republican is known more for his bare-knuckle politics than his pugilistic skills. He said Wednesday he plans to step into the ring Saturday for a two-round exhibition bout against a New York state kickboxing champion, "Irish" Josh Foley, at a pub in Wantagh, N.Y.</p><p>"Some people have been comparing my bout with Foley to Tiger Woods playing golf with President Obama," King said in a telephone interview with The Associated Press. "If Foley goes all out, it will be a very quick fight."</p><p>The congressman said he weighs in at about 230 pounds and has been training for about nine years. The bout isn't for charity, he said.</p><p>"We'll be sparring," King said. "If anyone is going to get knocked out, it will be me. I can tell you that much."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/ny_congressman_peter_king_to_step_into_boxing_ring_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/ny_congressman_peter_king_to_step_into_boxing_ring_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Peter King: Rubio has some &#8220;balls&#8221; to fundraise in New York</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/28/peter_king_rubio_has_some_balls_to_fundraise_in_new_york/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/28/peter_king_rubio_has_some_balls_to_fundraise_in_new_york/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 21:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricane Sandy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13215019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Republican attacks Marco Rubio for voting against Hurricane Sandy aid]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Peter King of New York slammed fellow Republican Marco Rubio for fundraising in New York after voting against federal funding for victims of Hurricane Sandy.</p><p>"Being from New York we’re not supposed to be suckers,” King told the New York Observer's <a href="http://politicker.com/2013/02/pete-king-cant-believe-rubio-has-the-balls-to-fundraise-in-new-york/">Politicker</a> blog. “It’s bad enough that these guys voted against it, that’s inexcusable enough. But to have the balls to come in and say, ‘We screwed you, now make us president'?"</p><p>King said that New York donors should cut off Rubio and any other Republicans who “threw a knife in the back in New York” by opposing the bill. “[Republicans] are more and more taking on this anti-Northeast attitude,” he said. “We say fine, if you want to be anti-Northeast, then the Northeast is going to be anti-them."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/28/peter_king_rubio_has_some_balls_to_fundraise_in_new_york/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/28/peter_king_rubio_has_some_balls_to_fundraise_in_new_york/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FEMA: Flood money will run out without Congressional action</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/fema_flood_money_will_run_out_without_congressional_action/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/fema_flood_money_will_run_out_without_congressional_action/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 13:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FEMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricane Sandy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Grimm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter King]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ahead of a House vote on Hurricane Sandy relief funding, the agency warns that its insurance money is running low]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After pressure from East Coast Republicans, House Speaker John Boehner will hold a vote on Hurricane Sandy relief funding on Friday. According to FEMA, the vote will be just in time.</p><p>On Thursday, FEMA said that barring congressional action to raise the agency's borrowing limit, "funds available to pay claims will be exhausted sometime around the week of January 7, 2013."</p><p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/01/04/us-storm-sandy-aid-idUSBRE90001Q20130104">Reuters</a> reports:</p><blockquote><p>The FEMA program is essentially the only U.S. flood insurer for residences. It has a $20.8 billion ceiling for borrowing authority.</p> <p>FEMA estimated Sandy-related flood losses of $6 billion to $12 billion in November, far beyond its cash and $3 billion in untapped borrowing authority.</p></blockquote><p>Friday's vote will be on a $9.7 billion spending package for the National Flood Insurance Program, with another vote scheduled for January 15 on the other $51 billion of the Senate's Hurricane Sandy package.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/fema_flood_money_will_run_out_without_congressional_action/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/fema_flood_money_will_run_out_without_congressional_action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dems introduce high-capacity magazine ban in the House</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/dems_introduce_high_capacity_magazine_ban_in_the_house/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/dems_introduce_high_capacity_magazine_ban_in_the_house/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Flake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown school shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne LaPierre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dana DeGette]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rep. Diana DeGette represents the Colorado district that includes Columbine High School]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Diana DeGette, D-Colo., introduced a ban on high-capacity magazines in the House earlier today, the first day of the new session of Congress.</p><p>According to the <a href="http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_22304452/degette-introduces-bill-ban-large-magazines">AP</a>, DeGette introduced the bill with Rep. Carolyn McCarthy, D-N.Y., whose husband was killed in a 1993 mass shooting on the Long Island Rail Road in New York. From the AP:</p><blockquote><p>[DeGette]'s district includes the site of the 1999 massacre at Columbine High School. It is also adjacent to last year's Aurora movie theater shooting site. In both of those attacks, the shooters' rifles were modified with high-capacity magazines. Those devices allow attackers to fire dozens of bullets without pausing to reload.</p></blockquote><p>Though it's still unclear whether a ban can pass the Republican-controlled House, there were some promising signs from at least one Republican earlier today.</p><p>Rep. Peter King, also from New York, <a href="http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/peter-king-i-really-dont-know-why-people">said</a> on "Morning Joe": "I voted for the assault weapon ban back in 1994. My father was a police officer. I really don't know why people need assault weapons."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/dems_introduce_high_capacity_magazine_ban_in_the_house/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/dems_introduce_high_capacity_magazine_ban_in_the_house/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rep. King says Boehner promises Sandy aid votes</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/rep_king_says_boehner_promises_sandy_aid_votes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/rep_king_says_boehner_promises_sandy_aid_votes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 21:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricane Sandy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Republican says the House Speaker has promised a vote by Jan. 15]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — A New York lawmaker says House Speaker John Boehner has promised votes to aid victims of Superstorm Sandy by Jan. 15.</p><p>Republican Rep. Peter King says the speaker will schedule a vote Friday for $9 billion in flood insurance and another on Jan. 15 for a remaining $51 billion in the package. The votes will be taken by the new Congress that will be sworn in Thursday.</p><p>Boehner's decision to cancel an expected vote Tuesday night had outraged lawmakers from New York, New Jersey and elsewhere, including many in his own party.</p><p>King said Boehner made the promise in a private meeting with lawmakers from affected states. King and others said they were now satisfied that the aid will be forthcoming.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/rep_king_says_boehner_promises_sandy_aid_votes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/rep_king_says_boehner_promises_sandy_aid_votes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans turn on House GOP leadership over Sandy aid</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/new_york_republicans_turn_on_house_gop_leadership_over_sandy_aid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/new_york_republicans_turn_on_house_gop_leadership_over_sandy_aid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 18:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricane Sandy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New York Rep. Peter King calls the House GOP's decision to adjourn before voting on Sandy relief "disgraceful"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans in states hit hardest by Hurricane Sandy are lining up against House Republican leadership for adjourning  before allowing a vote to fund relief efforts.</p><p>On Wednesday, Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., excoriated John Boehner and House Republicans, calling it "absolutely disgraceful" and saying that "my world turned upside down last night."</p><p>"People in my party, they wonder why they're becoming a minority party," King said on CNN. "They're writing off New York, they're writing off New Jersey. Well, they've written me off, and they're gonna have a hard time getting my vote, I can tell you that."</p><p>King added that "anyone from New York or New Jersey who contributes one penny to the Republican Congressional Campaign Committee should have their head examined."</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Y170mF1PuBc" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p>Rep. Michael Grimm, R-N.Y., said he was "utterly devastated" by the decision, and called it "beyond surprising" that the House adjourned without a vote. He said it was ultimately House Speaker John Boehner's call to adjourn without a vote, and that he had received signals from House Majority Leader Eric Cantor that the vote would happen.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/new_york_republicans_turn_on_house_gop_leadership_over_sandy_aid/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/new_york_republicans_turn_on_house_gop_leadership_over_sandy_aid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 Islam-bashing Republicans to watch in 2013</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/5_islam_bashing_republicans_to_watch_in_2013/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/5_islam_bashing_republicans_to_watch_in_2013/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Cantor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike McCaul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louie Gohmert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13157501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While some prominent haters were booted out of office, Islamophobia is still alive and well in American politics]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> When Muslim-American organizations and activists concerned with Islamophobia woke up the day after the election, on November 7, they were elated. Key members of what had been dubbed the House Republican <a href="http://ca.cair.com/sandiego/news/fate_of_the_congressional_anti_muslim_caucus">“Islamophobia caucus”</a>had been voted out of office. These Tea Party-affiliated Republicans included Joe Walsh (R-IL), who had warned in August that Islamists were “trying to kill Americans every week” and were lurking in the Chicago suburbs, and Allen West (R-FL), who linked the entire religion of Islam to terrorism.</p><p>These fear-mongers won’t be able to spread their hysteria from the bully pulpit of a House seat any longer. But that doesn’t mean that the House Republican caucus has rid themselves of the scourge of anti-Muslim politicians who stoke that sentiment for political gain. On the contrary, the House Republican caucus remains the place where the ugly head of Islamophobia rests comfortably.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/5_islam_bashing_republicans_to_watch_in_2013/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/5_islam_bashing_republicans_to_watch_in_2013/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>78</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meet the new Peter King</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/01/meet_the_new_peter_king/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/01/meet_the_new_peter_king/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2012 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islamophobia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13112026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rep. Peter King is stepping down as chair of the Homeland Security Committee -- will his replacement be any better?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good news for people who are uneasy with New York Republican Rep. Peter King’s leadership of the House Homeland Security Committee: He’s stepping down thanks to term limits. But there's some potential bad news: His replacement may not be a whole lot better.</p><p>Texas Republican Rep. Mike McCaul edged out Michigan Rep. Candice Miller -- who was the <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/84293.html">GOP’s best hope</a> of getting a female major committee head -- and Mike Rodgers in a close private <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dailypolitics/2012/11/michael-mccaul-of-texas-tapped-to-replace-nys-peter-king-as-house-homeland-sec">vote</a> this week. King’s tenure as chairman drew controversy for the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/06/19/congresss_worst_islamophobe/">series of hearings</a> he held on the radicalization of Muslims in America. Critics didn’t discount the threat of homegrown terror but said King should have expanded the hearings to include all kinds of violent radicalism, including right-wing extremism.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/01/meet_the_new_peter_king/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/01/meet_the_new_peter_king/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.securefreedomradio.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/02222011_Seg3_McCaul_11min13.mp3" length="2695628" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Petraeus testimony changes no minds</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/petraeus_testimony_changes_no_minds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/petraeus_testimony_changes_no_minds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 22:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya embassy attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Petraeus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi attack]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13101060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former CIA chief testifies about Benghazi, and lawmakers hear what they want to hear]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">What happened at today’s much-hyped congressional hearings featuring disgraced former CIA director David Petraeus? It’s hard to say, since the hearings were classified and reporters were not even allowed to see Petraeus enter and leave, let alone listen to him speak.</p><p style="text-align: left;">To judge by what representatives of each party told the press after the hearing, you’d think they attended entirely different meetings. Republicans seem to think that Petraeus completely undercut the Obama administration’s account of the attacks on U.S. diplomats in Benghazi, Libya, while Democrats insist he backed up that account.</p><p>"The fact is, the reference to al-Qaida was taken out somewhere along the line by someone outside the intelligence community ... We need to find out who did it and why,” said Republican Rep. Peter King, the chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, who attended the first of two back-to-back hearings with Petraeus. (The second was with senators.) "The general was adamant there was no politicization of the process, no White House interference or political agenda ... He completely debunked that idea," said Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff of the very same meeting.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/petraeus_testimony_changes_no_minds/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/petraeus_testimony_changes_no_minds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sunday show roundup</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/sunday_show_roundup_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/sunday_show_roundup_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 17:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunday morning shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Petraeus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13068755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The pundits addressed pot and Petraeus]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On this week's Sunday shows, politicians and pundits addressed the resignation of CIA Director David Petraeus, as well as the looming showdown over the federal budget. Here are the highlights:</p><p>On Petraeus:</p><p>Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., was confused as to why the the FBI didn't alert President Obama to the affair until just last week. “The FBI should have had an obligation to tell the president,” King said on CNN's "State of the Union." “It just doesn’t add up.”</p><p>But Sen. Bob Menendez, D-N.J., also on CNN, said everything about the FBI's handling of the revelations appears proper: “I don’t see a conspiracy behind every curtain as some of my colleagues do."</p><p>On the budget negotiations in Congress:</p><p>Bill Kristol argued that the GOP should not "fall on its sword" defending lower taxes for millionaires. "Don't scream and yell when one person says, 'you know what, it won't kill the country if we raise taxes a little bit on millionaires.' It really won't, I don't think," he said on Fox News Sunday.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/sunday_show_roundup_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/sunday_show_roundup_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FBI &#8220;stumbled&#8221; across Petraeus affair</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/fbi_stumbled_across_petraeus_affair/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/fbi_stumbled_across_petraeus_affair/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paula Broadwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Petraeus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dianne Feinstein]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13068732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest on the CIA Director's resignation]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paula Broadwell, David Petraeus’s biographer, inadvertently tipped off the FBI to her affair with David Petraeus after she sent "harassing" emails to another woman, according to FBI officials.</p><p>The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/11/us/fbi-said-to-have-stumbled-into-news-of-david-petraeus-affair.html?pagewanted=all">New York Times</a> reports that the FBI came across information about the affair after the woman, who knows Petraeus and Broadwell, complained:</p><blockquote><p>"When F.B.I. agents following up on the complaint began to examine Ms. Broadwell’s e-mails, they discovered exchanges between her and Mr. Petraeus that revealed that they were having an affair, said several officials who spoke of the investigation on the condition of anonymity. They also discovered that Ms. Broadwell possessed certain classified information, one official said, but apparently concluded that it was probably not Mr. Petraeus who had given it to her and that there had been no major breach of security. No leak charges are expected to be filed as a result of the investigation."</p></blockquote><p>A Congressional official who was briefed on the affair told the Times that the FBI said the investigation  “started with two women," but “it didn't start with Petraeus, but in the course of the investigation they stumbled across him."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/fbi_stumbled_across_petraeus_affair/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/fbi_stumbled_across_petraeus_affair/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should NFL players be forced to wear pink?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/09/should_the_nfl_players_be_forced_to_wear_pink/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/09/should_the_nfl_players_be_forced_to_wear_pink/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports Illustrated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan G. Komen for the Cure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pinkwashing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13034061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A writer gets flak for blasting the NFL's breast cancer campaign, but you can hate cancer and its commodification]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a sports writer, Peter King is undoubtedly used to getting flak for his opinions. So when he tweeted last week in despair at professional football's month-long, rosy-hued display of breast cancer awareness, <a href="https://twitter.com/SI_PeterKing/status/252960860639731712">"Please. Not pink for a month, NFL. A week, great. But a month?"</a> the response was predictably unfavorable. "You got a problem w/ cancer awareness?" wrote one of his Twitter critics, while another asked, "Really? Is it that serious? If it's raising money for cancer is it really worth complaining about?" and yet another declared, "Get over it for those we've lost and survived, we honor them in any way we can."</p><p>In the face of the retorts, though, King pressed on, musing, "Is breast cancer the only charity NFL should support?" To the person who asked, "What if each team could pick one week in October where they wear the pink?" he retorted, "Perfect. That'd be ideal." But over at ESPN's radio 104.5, Jay Sanin was appalled. <a href="http://1045theteam.com/sports-illustrateds-peter-king-complains-about-nfl-wearing-pink-for-entire-breast-cancer-awareness-month/">"ARE YOU SERIOUS?"</a> he demanded, suggesting, "Maybe instead of being an ignorant idiot about life-threatening diseases, Peter King should stick to being an ignorant idiot about the NFL."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/09/should_the_nfl_players_be_forced_to_wear_pink/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/09/should_the_nfl_players_be_forced_to_wear_pink/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Peter King: AP has &#8220;no moral integrity&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/31/peter_king_ap_has_no_moral_integrity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/31/peter_king_ap_has_no_moral_integrity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 20:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican National Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12998724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Long Island congressman attacks the reporters who exposed the NYPD's surveillance of Muslims]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TAMPA -- In order to enter the Republican National Convention, one had to pass through multiple layers of security, which involved so many different law enforcement agencies that I literally lost count. So police issues were on my mind on Wednesday when I spotted Rep. Peter King, the cranky <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/09/us/politics/09king.html">Irish Republican Army apologist</a> from Long Island. I asked if he thought there was any merit to arguments leveled -- by both the <a href="http://www.thenation.com/article/164501/paramilitary-policing-seattle-occupy-wall-street">left</a> and <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/radley-balko/police-militarization-use-of-force-swat-raids_b_1123848.html">right</a> alike -- that police departments across the country have been excessively federalized and/or militarized, with the Tampa security situation being a prime example.</p><p>"No," King stated plainly. "Obviously, we always have to be looking out at all times that the police maintain their proper role. But I think the Department of Homeland Security, and the police I deal with -- whether it's the FBI or the New York City Police Department -- no, I think civil liberties are being protected. Privacy is being protected. And considering the nature of the threat against us, I would say the police are remarkably restrained."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/31/peter_king_ap_has_no_moral_integrity/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/31/peter_king_ap_has_no_moral_integrity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>