<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Peyton Manning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/peyton_manning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 19:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Can Tebow find salvation?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/21/can_tebow_find_salvation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/21/can_tebow_find_salvation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peyton Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Tebow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12709151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Updated: After losing his job in Denver,  evangelicals\' favorite jock faces an uncertain future in New York.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>[UPDATED BELOW]</strong></p><p>You don't need to be an evangelical Christian to care about the future of Tim Tebow. I’m a lapsed atheist myself. But with the <a href="http://aol.sportingnews.com/nfl/story/2012-03-20/peyton-manning-broncos-tim-tebow-john-elway-2012-nfl-free-agents">resurrection</a> of quarterback Peyton Manning in Denver, I wonder most about the future of the spiritual scrambler, who led the Broncos to the playoffs last year.</p><p>The Broncos signing Manning to replace Tebow is a no-brainer. He may be diminished by age and injury, but he is also the best quarterback of our time, not because he is a brilliant coach’s puppet (Tom Brady) or an on-field, off-field brute (Ben Roethlisberger) but by virtue of a fierce work ethic and a concentrated intelligence that is contagious and inspirational. Whatever is left at age 35 of him will make the Broncos better.</p><p>Through 14 years and two Super Bowls with the Indianapolis Colts, there was something reassuringly manly about Manning, his cool leadership, his laconic but friendly demeanor, his thoughtful professionalism, that evoked my role models on the Encore Westerns channel like Marshal Dillon and Wagonmaster Flint. (Something went out of American life when the legend of the western hero was replaced by the myth of the sports idol.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/21/can_tebow_find_salvation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/21/can_tebow_find_salvation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Peyton Manning, great enough to fail</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/08/peyton_manning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/08/peyton_manning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peyton Manning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/02/08/peyton_manning</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The quarterback is just as spectacular as he was before his unlikely loss to the Saints]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peyton Manning is on a different planet, an undiscovered dimension. He's a Chuck Norris joke told without irony, a quarterback so transcendent your grandkids will tell their grandkids about your retellings of Peyton feats. Like the Almighty, Manning lives on an untouchable plane that his powers of ubiquity (look up, he's staring at you from yet another commercial) cause to overlap with our humble sphere.&#160; If you haven't heard of him, you're probably going to hell.&#160;Way back on Sunday morning, the question wasn't whether or not&#160;Manning could carry the Super Bowl -- but <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=simmons/100205&amp;amp;sportCat=nfl">how</a> <a href="http://%20http://www.boston.com/sports/football/articles/2010/02/07/one_thing_not_up_for_debate_colts_will_win/?page=full">badly</a> <a href="http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/02/04/dungy-says-super-bowl-wont-be-close/">would he crush</a> the Saints?&#160;</p><p>     <em>[Cut to Bourbon Street looking like French Liberation meets "Girls Gone Wild."]</em>   </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/02/08/peyton_manning/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/08/peyton_manning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Census Bureau ad might save money</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/08/census_ad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/08/census_ad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Census]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peyton Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/02/08/census_ad</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Census pushes back on GOP complaints about an ad campaign for the 2010 survey]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was one ad during Sunday night's Super Bowl that drove a lot of Republicans completely crazy -- and no, it wasn't the one about the guy whose girlfriend <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/super_bowl/index.html?story=/ent/tv/review/2010/02/08/superbowl_commercials">removed his spine</a>, though it probably should have been. Between the Doritos and Bud Light spots, the U.S. Census Bureau dropped in for a visit with football fans. And as far as the GOP was concerned, that was among the dumbest things government has ever done. (Which, considering how many of today's Republicans view government, is saying quite a bit.)</p><p>"We spend a couple million dollars on irritable bowel syndrome, and we spend a couple of million dollars on an ad in the Super Bowl Sunday, and we continue the practices that infuriate our citizenry because they're hurting so badly," Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., told Fox News's Greta Van Susteren on Thursday. "They're having to tighten their belts. This is what feeds the tea parties. This is what feeds the anti-incumbency mood that's out there, an out-of-touch Congress and an out-of-touch administration." Smelling budget blood in the political water, other Republicans chimed in, as well. "Given the difficult economic times our nation is facing, I am very concerned with the amount of money spent by the Census Bureau for the production and airing of these commercials," Sen. Johnny Isakson, R-Ga., wrote Census officials last week, demanding a detailed explanation of just how much money the ad would be wasting and whether a similar campaign during the 2000 Census yielded any improvement in response rates.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/02/08/census_ad/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/08/census_ad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tim Tebow&#8217;s tempest in a TV spot</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/08/tebow_ad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/08/tebow_ad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 02:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peyton Manning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//feature/2010/02/07/tebow_ad</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Focus on the Family's benign Super Bowl ad]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you kidding me? That was what all the controversy was about? A poorly-written 30-second spot set to upbeat elevator music?&#160;I missed the Puppy Bowl for <em>that</em>?</p><p>Focus on the Family's <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet/feature/2010/02/03/tebow/index.html">highly</a> <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet/feature/2010/01/28/super_bowl_ad/index.html">anticipated</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet/feature/2010/01/26/abortion_ad_superbowl/index.html">controversial</a> Super Bowl ad was sure shocking -- but not for any of the expected reasons. Pam Tebow didn't tell the harrowing story of how she risked her life by refusing a medically-advised abortion while pregnant with her future Heisman Trophy-winner. Instead, she talked about her "miracle baby" without mentioning the particulars of his birth. She painted just the broad strokes of a heartwarming family tale:</p><blockquote> <p>He almost didn't make it into the world. I can remember so many times where I almost lost him. It was so hard. Well, he's all grown up now and I <em>still</em> worry about his health. You know, with all our family's been through, we have to be tough.</p> </blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/02/08/tebow_ad/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/08/tebow_ad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Super Bowl? Alternatives to the big game</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/07/super_bowl_alternatives/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/07/super_bowl_alternatives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 02:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I Like to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peyton Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/i_like_to_watch//2010/02/06/super_bowl_alternatives</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The anti-fan's TV survival guide to the most epic day in football]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of us will take part in any function, holiday or yearly tradition that involves melted cheese and requires sitting in one place for four to eight hours, moving only to retrieve refreshments and/or scold anyone blocking the television set.</p><p>Thankfully, even small children and needy house pets seem to have an intuitive grasp of the divine nature of the Super Bowl, during which adults reserve the right to distractedly mumble and gorge themselves all afternoon while staring at the TV.</p><p>Unfortunately, the game itself frequently sucks. But don't let that rob you of your one big chance to shut out the world and stare, slack-jawed, at a five-hour-long televisual sporting spectacle. Why, when the game gets dull, why not flip over to ...</p><p>     <strong>The Puppy Bowl</strong>   </p><p>Maybe the men in shiny white tights no longer seem like adequate visual eye candy to match your outsize libido, or maybe you're so old that what really makes your heartbeat race uncontrollably at this point is the sight of a 4-month old Chihuahua-pug mix, clumsily chasing a squeaky football toy across the goal line while a 3-month-old Lab-collie mix pounces on her own tail. Does this mean you're a sad shell of your former self, or does it simply mean that you're finally mature enough to acknowledge that nothing can make you lose sight of your own mortality quite as quickly as the sight of baby animals cavorting?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/02/07/super_bowl_alternatives/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/07/super_bowl_alternatives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The truth behind Tebow&#8217;s tale</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/28/super_bowl_ad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/28/super_bowl_ad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peyton Manning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//feature/2010/01/28/super_bowl_ad</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The star athlete's "pro-life" story has a dark underbelly]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For just a moment, forget the debate about <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet/feature/2010/01/26/abortion_ad_superbowl/index.html">whether advocacy ads belong</a> in the year's biggest night in sports. The Center for Reproductive Rights has taken an entirely different tack in fighting Focus on the Family's scheduled Super Bowl spot: Countering the personal anti-abortion tale Tim Tebow and his mother are expected to deliver with cold, hard facts.&#160;</p><p>In case you haven't been reading Broadsheet lately -- for shame! -- and are unfamiliar with the particulars of Pam Tebow's story: While pregnant working as a missionary in the Philippines, she&#160;fell ill with amoebic dysentery and was treated with robust antibiotics, which she says doctors told her had caused fetal damage, but she refused their advice that she have an abortion for her own safety. Luckily, she gave birth to a healthy baby boy -- and to a perfect anti-abortion tale. Only, one detail has so far been excluded from Tebow's public tellings of the story: abortion was, and still is, illegal in&#160;the Philippines. There isn't even a single exception allowed for cases where the mother's life is in danger. In <a href="http://reproductiverights.org/sites/crr.civicactions.net/files/documents/Letter%20to%20CBS%20regarding%20Focus%20on%20the%20Family%20Ad.pdf">a letter to CBS</a> protesting the Super Bowl spot, CRR explains:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/28/super_bowl_ad/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/28/super_bowl_ad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>121</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Censoring the Super Bowl</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/26/abortion_ad_superbowl/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/26/abortion_ad_superbowl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peyton Manning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//feature/2010/01/26/abortion_ad_superbowl</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Should Focus on the Family's anti-choice message interrupt the biggest night in sports?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Super Bowl XLIV is still 12 days away, but&#160;a&#160;pre-game showdown has already begun between pro- and anti-choice activists.&#160;Focus on the Family, that paragon of "righteous" bigotry, has landed a coveted 30-second TV spot during the game that is expected to deliver an anti-abortion message,&#160;and the Women's Media Center, with the support of several reproductive rights organizations, has kicked off a campaign for CBS to ban the ad.</p><p>Here's what we know so far about the ad: It features star college quarterback Tim Tebow and his mother, Pam, sharing "a personal story centered on the theme of 'Celebrate Family, Celebrate Life,'" according to a Focus on the Family <a href="http://www2.focusonthefamily.com/press/pressreleases/a000001434.cfm">press release.</a> It's safe to assume the spot will&#160;tell the story of how Tebow's mom fell ill during her pregnancy but refused doctors' advice that she have an abortion for her own safety. Luckily enough, she gave birth to a healthy baby boy and future Heisman Trophy-winner.&#160;Tebow only confirmed suspicions that the ad takes this tack when the controversy was raised at a recent press conference: "I've always been very convicted of it" -- presumably his antiabortion view -- "because that's the reason I'm here, because my mom was a very courageous woman."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/26/abortion_ad_superbowl/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/26/abortion_ad_superbowl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Friday Night Lights&#8221; embraces the agony of defeat</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/28/friday_night_lights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/28/friday_night_lights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friday Night Lights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I Like to Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peyton Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/i_like_to_watch//2009/10/27/friday_night_lights</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Coach Taylor and his scrappy new team of losers are still cause for celebration during the show's fourth season]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Y'all look like a bunch of dumb-asses out there!"</p><p>Coach Taylor is at his wit's end. After a few triumphant seasons as head coach of the Dillon Panthers football team, he finds himself trying to rally together a brand-new team at a brand-new school, East Dillon High, after the town is redistricted. The field is brown and dusty. The players have never played football before. (Um, wouldn't a few of the good players have ended up at the new school?) Some of the players have criminal records. Others are unaccustomed to being yelled at, or unwilling to run grueling drills in the withering Texas heat.</p><p>Although Taylor (Kyle Chandler) may be facing a losing battle for the first time in his career, in its fourth season, <strong>"Friday Night Lights"</strong> (premieres 9 p.m. Wednesday, Oct. 28, on DirecTV, airing next year on NBC) is just as thoughtful and restrained as it's ever been, with its focus firmly planted on the small-town disappointments of ordinary people.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/10/28/friday_night_lights/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/28/friday_night_lights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>As goes Tennessee football, so goes the GOP</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/14/lane_kiffin_and_sarah_palin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/14/lane_kiffin_and_sarah_palin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peyton Manning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2009/09/14/lane_kiffin_and_sarah_palin</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lane Kiffin, the new coach of the Volunteers, garners a Sarah Palin comparison. Get ready for a blowout loss]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who says sports and politics don't mix? On Thursday, ESPN broadcaster Tim Brando <a href="http://www.gatorsports.com/article/20090913/ARTICLES/909149993/1136?Title=Fulmer-Kiffin-needs-to-back-up-offseason-talk">reached back to last year's presidential campaign</a> to explain the current state of Tennessee football via a comparison between Lane Kiffin, the Volunteers' brash 34-year-old head coach, and Sarah Palin.</p><blockquote> <p>"And in my estimation, the thing Lane Kiffin, to this point, has done is energize the base," Brando told Gainesville Sun reporter Dwight Collins, "which right now in this economy is what big-time business and big-time college football is about."</p> <p>"It's sort of what Sarah Palin did for the Republican ticket. Maybe not get more votes, but energize the base of the Republican party. It doesn't mean that it's necessarily going to be successful, but if that's what (Tennessee) wanted to do when they hired Kiffin, that's what he was able to accomplish in the offseason. Now we'll see how much staying power he has, and how successful he can be."</p> </blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/09/14/lane_kiffin_and_sarah_palin/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/14/lane_kiffin_and_sarah_palin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should we forgive Michael Vick?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/17/vick_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/17/vick_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noble Beasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peyton Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/environment/feature/2009/08/17/vick</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Science says we'll be healthier if we do, but some argue there's room in a healthy life for a good grudge]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let's be clear: Michael Vick's involvement in the blood sport of dogfighting was beyond wrong. It was horrifying, senseless and inhumane. The Virginia-based Bad Newz Kennels, which Vick funded, was reported to have executed pit bulls deemed unfit to compete. This was as brutal as it gets.</p><p>Still, it's time to consider forgiveness for Michael Vick.</p><p>Last month, Vick completed a 23-month prison sentence. He has admitted to his mistakes, apologized to the National Football League, his fans and his former coaches and teammates with the Atlanta Falcons. He has pledged to reform his ways, including working with the Humane Society of the United States on anti-dogfighting campaigns.</p><p>Last month, NFL commissioner Roger Goodell reinstated Vick on a conditional basis, saying the 29-year-old quarterback, who last week signed a two-year deal with the Philadelphia Eagles, is free to take part in preseason practices, workouts and meetings, as well as to participate in two preseason games. News of Vick's acquisition by the Eagles prompted a harsh reaction from many, including People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, who condemned the signing and questioned what message it sends to young fans. Undoubtedly, the team will face a public-relations nightmare.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/08/17/vick_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/17/vick_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>219</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Best! Game! Ever! Played!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/02/26/greatest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/02/26/greatest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Basketball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peyton Manning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sports/kaufman/feature/2009/02/26/greatest</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The  trend in sports books is to claim that a single contest changed the course of history. Sure it did.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We seem to have a little trend going in the field of sports history. For all I know it reflects a broader movement in letters, but I don't get out much so I don't know. But it's clearly in vogue to identify a single ballgame and claim that the rush of history pivoted upon it. Or at least that the game in question was, without question, the greatest game ever.</p><p>Until it's time to write the next book, I guess.</p><p>So just in the last week or so the mail has brought "When March Went Mad: The Game That Transformed Basketball," Seth Davis' book about the Magic Johnson-Larry Bird NCAA title matchup in 1979, and "The Best Game Ever: Pirates 10, Yankees 9: October 13, 1960," Jim Reisler's tome about the World Series Game 7 that ended on Bill Mazeroski's home run.</p><p>Those have been tossed on the pile with "The Greatest Game: The Yankees, the Red Sox, and the Playoff of '78" by Richard Bradley and my DVD copy of ESPN's recent "Greatest Game Ever Played," about the 1958 NFL Championship Game between the Baltimore Colts and the New York Giants.</p><p>I want to make it clear I'm not commenting on the quality of any of these things. I haven't read any of the books and haven't seen the movie.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/02/26/greatest/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/02/26/greatest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Favre retires &#8212; this is not a drill</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/02/11/favre_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/02/11/favre_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peyton Manning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sports/kaufman/2009/02/11/favre</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It appears the future Hall of Famer is going to keep trying until he gets it right.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>     <em>They say we're young and we don't know <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0107048/">...</a></em>   </p><p>OK, campers, rise and shine. It's the second annual Brett Favre Retirement Day and you don't want to miss a minute of it.</p><p>The great quarterback has told the New York Jets that he's retiring after his 18th season in the NFL, same thing he did after his 17th season. Brett Favre retires more often than a narcoleptic mattress tester, so rather than write a whole new postmortem, I'm just going to point you to <a href="http://www.salon.com/sports/col/kaufman/2008/03/05/wednesday/print.html">last year's version.</a></p><p>Let's see: Joke, transcended the game, people not believing he's really retiring, the Streak, lovable everyman image, annual diva routine, might change his mind but it looks like this is really it.</p><p>Yup, still good.</p><p>See you in a few weeks, Brett.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/02/11/favre_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/02/11/favre_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kurt Warner, Hall of Famer?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/02/04/letters_6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/02/04/letters_6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peyton Manning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sports/kaufman/feature/2009/02/04/letters</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the wake of his third fine Super Bowl performance, the readers write about that and other big-game subjects.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good conversation in the <a href="http://letters.salon.com/sports/kaufman/feature/2009/02/02/super_bowl/view/?show=all">letters section</a> of this column's <a href="http://www.salon.com/sports/kaufman/feature/2009/02/02/super_bowl/index.html">Super Bowl</a> piece Monday. The main recurring topic was Kurt Warner's Hall of Fame qualifications, though there were others.</p><p>Let's dig in, shall we?</p><p><strong><a href="http://letters.salon.com/sports/kaufman/feature/2009/02/02/super_bowl/permalink/05ba9296f6f23aa5ec48b3a087f2140a.html">Big Paulie</a>:</strong> Were the two TD drives by the Cardinals in the 4th Quarter enough to cement Kurt Warner as a Hall of Fame QB, in spite of the fact that they lost?</p><p>Up till that point, I'd say he had lost some of his HOF luster. But after the last score, he was looking like he belongs.</p><p><strong><a href="http://letters.salon.com/sports/kaufman/feature/2009/02/02/super_bowl/permalink/cdf6cca7e25c11d86627b75fda8f3ba7.html">The Brad</a>:</strong> Whether Warner deserves enshrinement ... Should not be decided by two drives in a Super Bowl.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/02/04/letters_6/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/02/04/letters_6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The party of prima donnas</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/02/03/super_bowl_5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/02/03/super_bowl_5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 11:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peyton Manning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//kamiya/2009/02/03/super_bowl</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama is trying to build a country that works together like a great football team. The Republicans want to take their ball and go home.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sunday's Super Bowl between the Arizona Cardinals and the Pittsburgh Steelers, watched by 100 million Amerians, was one of the best ever played. The taut, suspenseful game was not decided until the final 35 seconds, when Pittsburgh's Santonio Holmes made a catch for the ages in the end zone to give his team a thrilling comeback victory.</p><p>To watch that winning play, and the two had-to-score Arizona drives before it, was to see teamwork in magnificent action: Eleven athletes working together like parts of an intricate clock, each player's success dependent on his teammates', all joined together by a bond forged in the brutal two-a-day workouts in the dog days of August and over the course of the long, grinding season, all aiming at the same goal.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/02/03/super_bowl_5/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/02/03/super_bowl_5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Steelers rally beats Cardinals rally</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/02/02/super_bowl_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/02/02/super_bowl_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peyton Manning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sports/kaufman/feature/2009/02/02/super_bowl</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Super Bowl 43 looked like a grinding Pittsburgh win before the two teams started trading thrilling comebacks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did someone make sure the Arizona Cardinals realized the Super Bowl has ended? If not they're probably in an airport lounge somewhere trying to figure out how they're going to come back one more time against that tough Pittsburgh Steelers defense.</p><p>The Cardinals got to Tampa by answering Philadelphia's second-half comeback in the <a href="http://www.salon.com/sports/kaufman/feature/2009/01/20/championship/">NFC Championship Game</a> with a magnificent game-winning touchdown drive. Sunday night they played the opposite role. Down 20-7 in the fourth quarter the Cardinals scored a touchdown and a safety before Larry Fitzgerald raced 64 yards for the go-ahead score with 2:37 to go. But that was enough time for Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger to collaborate with receiver Santonio Holmes on a trophy-winning drive.</p><p>Steelers 27, Cardinals 23. Super Bowl 43 was a beauty, not quite a match for the <a href="http://www.salon.com/sports/col/kaufman/2008/02/04/monday/">historically significant upset</a> of a year ago, but a similarly thrilling game at the end, the would-be winning score one-upped by the real winner.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/02/02/super_bowl_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/02/02/super_bowl_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>108</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Super Bowl 43 preview</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/01/30/super_bowl_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/01/30/super_bowl_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peyton Manning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sports/kaufman/feature/2009/01/30/super_bowl</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Steelers are defensive beasts with a pedigree and a quarterback. The Cardinals -- well, they have a quarterback too.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twenty-five random things about the Super Bowl.</p><p>1. <a href="http://www.nfl.com/superbowl/43">Sunday's game</a> is a classic matchup of a historically successful, old-school franchise with a chance to become the all-time leader in Super Bowl victories, the Pittsburgh Steelers, and ... the Arizona Cardinals.</p><p>2. The Cardinals can't win. The Steelers are better at everything it's possible for a football team to be better at, with one or two exceptions. The Steelers are favored by a touchdown, and that seems generous to our friends from the desert. Anyone who picks the Cardinals is just dreaming.</p><p>3. The Cardinals also couldn't win three straight playoff games to get to the Super Bowl. This was a team that only went 9-7 after being spotted a 6-0 record against its own pathetic division mates, the St. Louis Rams, San Francisco 49ers and Seattle Seahawks. The Cardinals lost four times by three touchdowns or more, and three of those came in the last five weeks of the season.</p><p>4. This column is picking the Cardinals. So, I'm dreaming.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/01/30/super_bowl_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/01/30/super_bowl_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Computer ties for Panel o&#8217; Experts title</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/01/29/panel_o_experts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/01/29/panel_o_experts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peyton Manning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sports/kaufman/feature/2009/01/29/panel_o_experts</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Accuscore, the electronic version of a dart-throwing monkey, ties Merril Hoge, also of ESPN, for the NFL game-picking championship.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This column's 2008 NFL Panel o' Experts ended in a tie. Merril Hoge of ESPN correctly picked the winner 171 times out of the 256 NFL games played this year, earning him the human championship and a share of the prize with Accuscore, ESPN's game-simulating computer, which also went 171-84-1.</p><p>It's the third year in a row the NFL Panel o' Experts has had co-winners, and the second year in a row the winners have had 171 wins, though this year's winning percentage of .670 is a slight improvement on last year's .668 by Mark Schlereth and Jeff Zillgitt because of the tie game. Last year's winners got 85 games wrong, not 84. The record for correct picks is 180, by Sean Salisbury in 2005.</p><p>But those other two ties were between two human beings. So Bush administration, don't you think? Now that we're in the <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2009/01/27/obama_facebook/">tech-savvy Obama age,</a> it's only fitting that our new computer overlords begin the takeover. I mean make their contribution to a better way of life.</p><p>Hoge and Accuscore continue the streak of ESPN representatives winning at least a share of the Panel o' Experts title every year since its inception in 2003.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/01/29/panel_o_experts/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/01/29/panel_o_experts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How super are the Arizona Cardinals?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/01/20/championship/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/01/20/championship/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peyton Manning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sports/kaufman/feature/2009/01/20/championship</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you believe the playoffs, very. But if you believe the regular season, they don't stand a chance against the punishing Steelers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two questions about the Arizona Cardinals: Are they the worst Super Bowl team of all time? And how badly are they going to beat the Pittsburgh Steelers?</p><p>Those queries neatly sum up the regular season and playoff run of your NFC champs, who beat the Philadelphia Eagles 32-25 in the Conference Championship Game, earning their first crack at the NFL title since 1948, when the Eagles beat them 7-0 in a snow storm in Philadelphia.</p><p>That was so long ago they didn't even have wi-fi in the helmets!</p><p>The Steelers outslugged the Baltimore Ravens 23-14 in an AFC Championship Game so brutal the teams didn't have huddles, they had triage.</p><p>The Steelers were quickly installed as roughly one-touchdown favorites in the Super Bowl, as well they should have been. They look like the best team in the NFL, a punishing defensive club with an offense that's solid average in just about every possible way. The Cardinals are merely that bunch in the desert with the crazy passing game and not much else.</p><p>Until the last three weeks.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/01/20/championship/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/01/20/championship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>They&#8217;re playing a title game where?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/01/16/conference_title/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/01/16/conference_title/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peyton Manning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sports/kaufman/feature/2009/01/16/conference_title</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Phoenix. Phoenix! And the Eagles are there too. It's nuts. The Ravens-Steelers slugfest in the AFC makes more sense. 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raise your hand if you had money down on the NFC Championship Game being played in Phoenix.</p><p>I don't mean this year. I mean ever.</p><p>The Arizona Cardinals host the Philadelphia Eagles -- you had them getting to within a game of the Super Bowl too, right? -- in the NFC game Sunday while the Baltimore Ravens visit the Pittsburgh Steelers to decide the AFC title.</p><p>That one was a little easier to see coming, though not too many of us had it written on the card once Tennessee got off to that 10-0 start. The Ravens and Steelers will meet for the third time this season. The Steelers won both regular-season games, but saying that makes it sound like there's a bigger spread between the division rivals than there is.</p><p><strong>NFC CHAMPIONSHIP GAME<br /> Philadelphia Eagles (9-6-1) at Arizona Cardinals (9-7)<br /> 3 p.m. EST, Fox</strong><br /> How improbable is this matchup? It's the first time since the NFL went to a 16-game schedule in 1977 that neither team in a Conference Championship Game has managed 10 wins in the regular season.</p><p>The winner of this game will be only the second nine-win team to make the Super Bowl since the schedule reached its current length. The other was the Los Angeles Rams, who went 9-7 in 1979.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/01/16/conference_title/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/01/16/conference_title/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The real national champion &#8212; and it isn&#8217;t Utah</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/01/06/utah_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/01/06/utah_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peyton Manning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sports/kaufman/feature/2009/01/06/utah</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The undefeated Utes, ineligible for the title, are this year's poster team for a playoff system. But one school has an even better claim.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here we go again. It's Utah this year, thanks to the Utes' upset win over Alabama in the Sugar Exhibition Game Friday night.</p><p>Utah is undefeated and beat four top-25 teams, including No. 4 Alabama and Oregon State, which wasn't in the top 25 at the time but will end up there after a thrilling 3-0 win over Pittsburgh in the Sun E.G. But the Utes have no chance at the national championship, because it's already been decided by a series of levers and pulleys that Florida and Oklahoma will play for that.</p><p>So Utah is this year's model of the idea that a significant number of teams in the so-called Bowl Subdivision, which used to be called Division I-A, have literally no chance at the national championship. There is nothing more that Utah could have done, but what it did wasn't enough to qualify for the title.</p><p>And it's not as if the Utes are in line behind other undefeated teams with tougher schedules. Florida and Oklahoma have both lost.</p><p>There's a word for that: "ineligible." Imagine a league in which some teams are simply ineligible for the championship. Wait, you don't have to do that. Just think about the Bowl Subdivision. About half of the teams are ineligible to win.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/01/06/utah_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/01/06/utah_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>60</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
